PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “CPT codes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Accuracy of CPT evaluation and management coding by family physicians.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on physicians' accuracy in coding for their services. The purpose of this study was to determine the current procedural terminology (CPT) evaluation and management coding accuracy of family physicians and define demographic variables associated with coding accuracy. METHODS: Six hundred randomly selected active members of the Illinois Academy of Family Physicians were sent six hypothetical progress notes of office visits along with a demographic survey. The study group assigned CPT evaluation and management codes to each of the progress notes and completed the demographic survey. Five expert coders also assigned codes to each of the cases. The accuracy of family physicians in determining CPT E/M codes was determined relative to that of expert coders. RESULTS: Family physicians agreed with the experts' CPT evaluation and management codes for 52% of established patient progress notes, the most common error being undercoding. In contrast, for new patient progress notes, family physicians agreed with the experts only 17% of the time, the predominant error being overcoding. No surveyed demographic variable was associated with coding accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The error rate for physician CPT coding is substantial and occurs more commonly with new patients. The complexity of the CPT coding guidelines, along with limited physician training in CPT coding, likely account for these results.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed2000

CPT 2000: interventional pain management coding in the new millennium.

UNLABELLED: Current Procedural Terminology is a systematic listing and coding of procedures and services performed by physicians and other providers. The CPT is the most widely accepted nomenclature for the reporting of procedures by physicians and other providers for health-care services provided by the government, and private health-insurance programs. It is most widely accepted for claim processing, and for the development of guidelines for medical care review, and it provides the uniform language applicable to medical education, research, and utilization. The CPT 2000 includes a multitude of changes. Those of most important interest to interventional pain management specialists include neural blockade where the codes used in pain management have been totally revamped. The entire section of neural blockade codes has been substantially altered, either by deletion, modification, or addition of a new code. Various deleted codes include 62274 to 62279, 62288, 62289, 62298, and 64440 to 64445. The definitions for CPT codes 62273, 62280, 62281, 62282, 62287, 62291, 62350, 64622, 64623, and 72285 have been modified and changed. Multiple new codes not only include replacement codes for epidurals, but also creation of codes for sacroiliac-joint injection, sacroiliac-joint arthrography, percutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions, facet-joint injections at the cervical and thoracic levels, neurolytic facet-joint neural blockade for cervical and thoracic levels, transforaminal injection codes for cervical/thoracic and lumbar/sacral, epidurography and radiological examination. The several advantages and disadvantages of new codes and future directions in CPT coding are described. KEYWORDS: Interventional pain management, CPT 1999, CPT 2000, epidural injections, facet-joint.

Journal Article↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Infrainguinal bypass conduit: autogenous or synthetic--a national perspective.

Numerous studies have compared autogenous versus synthetic grafts for infrainguinal bypasses. Synthetic grafts are associated with shorter operating times, comparable reimbursement, and despite inferior patency rates, remain in frequent use. Therefore, this study was undertaken in an effort to characterize, from a national perspective, the practice patterns and the drivers of practice variation in the use of synthetic grafts for infrainguinal bypass. Two data sets were obtained: 1) Medicare billings of infrainguinal bypasses in 49 states, years 1995 through 1997 (number of procedures, 254,677). Procedures were defined by nine CPT billing codes. 2) Hospitals over 150 beds in six states (CA, CO, CT, IA, MN, MS) were asked for volume statistics on the same CPT codes. Data were received from 27 institutions, comprising 1,063 procedures. Variations in graft use were analyzed by hospital type (teaching versus non-teaching) and correlated with the prevalence of diabetes mellitus and smoking. Nationwide, 41% of infrainguinal bypasses in 1997 were performed using synthetic grafts. Interstate synthetic conduit use ranged from 27% to 80%. These differences were similar for bypasses to popliteal or infrapopliteal vessels. Admission to a teaching hospital was associated with a lower use of synthetic grafts (21% vs 51%, odds ratio 0.26, p<0.0001). No correlation was seen between the prevalence of diabetes mellitus or smoking, and synthetic graft use. Synthetic graft use was significantly lower at teaching hospitals, and there was substantial interstate and intrastate variations. These findings suggest that there is wide variation in practice patterns. Further studies appear warranted to define the role of patient demographics and physician preference in explaining these differences.

Blood Vessel Prosthesis↗
PubMed1988

Medical psychotherapy. Clinical application in an inpatient setting.

Under the prevailing Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) billing codes, the function of the inpatient psychiatrist is defined in terms of providing "psychotherapy." Various third-party auditors have raised the implication of fraud when this has not been provided in a standardized fashion. In response, revisions in the CPT codes have been proposed aimed at legitimizing the true responsibilities of the attending psychiatrist. As an alternative solution, I have attempted to briefly summarize the concept of "medical psychotherapy," clarify how this approach would apply in an acute inpatient setting, and outline how it differs from the more classically defined outpatient psychotherapy models.

Humans↗
PubMed1990

Variations in coding practices among Connecticut urologists for the Medicare population.

As health care costs continue to rise, alternatives to the traditional fee for service system of physician reimbursement are being explored. Recently a resource-based relative-value system was enacted by Congress to correct some of the perceived inequities of Medicare reimbursement. Since reimbursement for evaluation and management services, also known as cognitive services, are based on Current Procedural Terminology (CPT-4) codes, we reviewed Medicare claims data for fiscal year 1986-87 to identify the coding habits of Connecticut urologists. We found that Connecticut urologist file 99% of their claims for cognitive services in one of six categories. Furthermore, we found that within these broad categories an average of 82% of the claims were filed under one primary practice specific code. The particular code selected, however, varied markedly between practices. Our data suggest that Connecticut urologists have adopted different standards for using CPT-4 codes and have adjusted for these differences through their fee schedules. These findings highlight the need for increased precision in CPT code definitions for cognitive services before they can be adapted to a reimbursement system based upon relative-value scales.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed2001

Medicare program; revisions to payment policies and five-year review of and adjustments to the relative value units under the physician fee schedule for calendar year 2002. Final rule with comment period.

This final rule with comment period makes several changes affecting Medicare Part B payment. The changes affect: refinement of resource-based practice expense relative value units (RVUs); services and supplies incident to a physician's professional service;anesthesia base unit variations;recognition of CPT tracking codes; and nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists performing screening sigmoidoscopies. It also addresses comments received on the June 8, 2001 proposed notice for the 5-year review of work RVUs and finalizes these work RVUs. In addition,we acknowledge comments received on our request for information on our policy for CPT modifier 62 that is used to report the work of co-surgeons. The rule also updates the list of certain services subject to the physician self-referral prohibitions to reflect changes to CPT codes and Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes effective January 1, 2002. These refinements and changes will ensure that our payment systems are updated to reflect changes in medical practice and the relative value of services. The Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 modernizes the mammography screening benefit and authorizes payment under the physician fee schedule effective January 1, 2002; provides for biennial screening pelvic examinations for certain beneficiaries effective July 1, 2001; provides for annual glaucoma screenings for high-risk beneficiaries effective January 1,2002; expands coverage for screening colonoscopies to all beneficiaries effective July 1, 2001; establishes coverage for medical nutrition therapy services for certain beneficiaries effective January 1, 2002; expands payment for telehealth services effective October 1, 2001; requires certain Indian Health Service providers to be paid for some services under the physician fee schedule effective July 1, 2001; and revises the payment for certain physician pathology services effective January 1, 2001. This final rule will conform our regulations to reflect these statutory provisions. In addition, we are finalizing the calendar year (CY) 2001 interim RVUs and are issuing interim RVUs for new and revised procedure codes for calendar year (CY) 2002. As required by the statute, we are announcing that the physician fee schedule update for CY2002 is -4.8 percent, the initial estimate of the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) for CY 2002 is 5.6 percent, and the conversion factor for CY 2002 is $36.1992.

Fee Schedules↗
PubMed2002

Reliability of assigning correct current procedural terminology-4 E/M codes.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We determine the degree of interagency and intra-agency agreement on Current Procedural Terminology-4 (CPT-4) coding levels for emergency department medical records. We hypothesized that the level of agreement among coding agencies would be poor, but the distribution of codes would be similar and not significantly different. METHODS: We performed a prospective observational study consisting of 3 separate randomized, blinded trials: 2 interagency comparisons and 1 intra-agency comparison. The setting was 2 suburban academic EDs. In the 2 interagency audits, 4 coding agencies were used. In the intra-agency comparison, we used 5 individual coders from within our own internal agency. The main outcome measures were the level of agreement not due to chance estimated with the multiple-rater weighted kappa statistic and the Kendall tau-b. We measured the distribution of codes by agency or by individual coders with the chi(2) test. RESULTS: Our sample for the 2 interagency audits consisted of 194 and 195 records, respectively. We observed poor agreement in the level of coding assigned to individual charts among the 4 coding agencies, with kappa values of 0.28 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.275 to 0.285) and 0.287 (95% CI 0.283 to 0.291). Our intra-agency comparison consisted of 100 records. The agreement in the intra-agency review was significantly better but still fair (kappa=0.436; 95% CI 0.428 to 0.444). The distribution of CPT-4 codes was significantly different for all 3 comparisons (P <.001). CONCLUSION: For our patient population, group of physicians, and methods of documentation, we identified poor-to-fair agreement in coding of emergency charts between coding agencies. Only fair agreement was measured in the intra-agency sample. The distribution of assigned CPT-4 codes was significantly different in each comparison. These findings have important financial and legal implications regarding the reliability of coding methods.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗
PubMed2002

Valuing neurosurgery services: part I. The historical development and interrelationships of current procedural terminology and the medicare fee schedule.

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) standardizes medical procedure coding for billing and reimbursement. Since adoption of CPT coding as the basis for the Medicare Fee Schedule (MFS) in 1992, CPT coding policies and policy changes have been influenced not only by medical necessity and customary practice, but also increasingly by Medicare payment policies. The MFS created regulatory price control in the United States medical market based on widespread adoption of modified MFS by private payers and benchmark MFS fees governed by federal budget limitations and set annually by government agency (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services).

Fee Schedules↗
PubMed2002

Using Medicare data to estimate the prevalence of breast cancer screening in older women: comparison of different methods to identify screening mammograms.

OBJECTIVES: To compare different methods for defining screening mammograms with Medicare claims and their impact on estimates of breast cancer screening rates. METHODS: Medicare outpatient facility and physician claims for 61,962 women in 1993 and 59,652 women in 1998 were reviewed for evidence of receipt of screening mammography. We compared the estimates of screening mammography use derived from CPT (Current Procedure Terminology) codes to categorize mammograms as screening or diagnostic versus using an algorithm that uses CPT codes plus breast-related diagnoses in the prior two years. We also compared estimates obtained from review of physician claims alone, facility claims alone, or the combination of the two sources of claims. RESULTS: Use of physician claims alone produced estimates of screening rates similar to rates calculated from use of both physician and outpatient (facility) claims. In 1993, the CPT code for screening mammography underestimated the rate of screening compared to estimates generated by using the algorithm (8.3 percent versus 18.0 percent prevalence, p<0.001). By 1998, the screening prevalence rate generated from using the CPT code for screening mammography more closely approximated the rate generated by the algorithm (23.0 percent versus 25.1 percent). By all methods of estimating screening mammography with Medicare claims, its prevalence increased substantially between 1993 and 1998. CONCLUSION: Providers increased their use of the screening mammography code in their charges to Medicare during the 1990s. This has improved the claims' ability to distinguish screening from diagnostic mammograms, but screening rates computed with claims continue to fall below those generated from self-reports of mammography use among general populations of older women.

Aged↗
PubMed1983

A system for reporting gynecologic procedures. A linguistic-logical approach.

A system was developed for reporting gynecologic procedures at Chicago Lying-In Hospital. The system is designed to report procedures and treatments performed during both inpatient stays and outpatient visits. Key features of the system are (1) the automatic encoding of all gynecologic procedures in both the ICD (International Classification of Diseases) and CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) coding systems, (2) the use of an independent program to maintain and update a multiply referenced network of operative procedures and (3) the use of a cross-indexing system that allows each procedure to be accessed in several ways and according to several patterns of keys (billing code number, CPT category, common abbreviation and/or linguistic feature).

Computers↗
PubMed1989

Current procedural terminology codes for psychiatric services.

Physicians' Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) is the system most commonly recognized by third-party payers for describing medical services in numerical codes for subsequent reimbursement. Adequate description of psychiatric services using CPT codes is an ongoing challenge. Psychiatrists have responded to the demands of third-party payers and peer review organizations for documentation and accountability by billing for specific services rather than by designating all care as psychotherapy. The authors present guidelines for using CPT codes to describe inpatient and outpatient psychiatric services and consultation. They also discuss continuing controversies, including regional diversity in the interpretation of codes by third-party payers, the risks of "gaming" the coding process, and the use of CPT codes by non-physician providers and the consequent mixing of data on service charges.

Abstracting and Indexing↗