PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Consensus Development Conference, NIH”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed1995

The NIH consensus development program.

The NIH CDCs are a highly visible, public forum to evaluate controversial medical technologies by synthesizing current medical science data. The consensus statements, although not intended as medical practice guidelines, may form part of the database preceding guideline formulation. It is difficult to assess the effect of the conferences on physician practice, in part reflecting the interference of the many other influences, medical and nonmedical, on physician behavior. Yet the program has had some success in influencing reimbursement policy for some technologies here and abroad and in influencing specialty organization policy, thereby indirectly affecting physician behavior. On the other hand, OMAR's dissemination activities have apparently been so successful that demand for CDC statements has more than doubled over the past five years, prompting OMAR to establish an information service (including fax and the Internet). And finally, the program has spawned consensus conferences throughout the world, including Canada, Western Europe, and Israel (Goodman & Baratz 1990).

Consensus Development Conferences, NIH as Topic↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of clinical treatment decisions with US National Institutes of Health consensus indications for lower third molar removal.

Treatment decisions about lower third molar surgery have important clinical and cost implications. Although indications for surgery have been the subject of a National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus conference at which several unambiguous criteria were agreed, no prospective investigations have been carried out to compare clinic treatment decisions with these consensus criteria. Treatment decisions made by six Hospital Service oral surgeons were therefore evaluated for 72 consecutive patients (28 men, 44 women) aged 15-44 years (mean age 25 years), referred for lower third molar assessment. The presence of local disease; recurrent pericoronitis; caries not amenable to restorative measures; follicular cyst formation; internal/external resorption and periodontal disease was recorded by an independent observer immediately after treatment planning had been completed. Of the 139 third molars present, 55 were unerupted, 79 partially erupted and 5 fully erupted. Thirty patients had been scheduled for surgery under general anaesthesia (GA), 36 under local anaesthesia and six patients had not been scheduled for surgery. A total of 42 teeth, according to NIH consensus criteria, had no indications for removal, of which 27 had been scheduled for surgery. These excluded disease-free contralateral teeth that had been scheduled for removal under GA. When a single episode of pericoronitis was excluded as a valid indication, 39 teeth did not meet criteria for removal but had been scheduled for surgery. It was concluded that two-thirds of lower third molars not meeting NIH consensus criteria for surgery had been scheduled for removal. The reasons for this, which may include inappropriate criteria, require further research.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Physical activity and cardiovascular health. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health.

OBJECTIVE: To provide physicians and the general public with a responsible assessment of the relationship between physical activity and cardiovascular health. PARTICIPANTS: A nonfederal, nonadvocate, 13-member panel representing the fields of cardiology, psychology, exercise physiology, nutrition, pediatrics, public health, and epidemiology. In addition, 27 experts in cardiology, psychology, epidemiology, exercise physiology, geriatrics, nutrition, pediatrics, public health, and sports medicine presented data to the panel and a conference audience of 600 during a 2-day public session. Questions and statements from conference attendees were considered during the open session. Closed deliberations by the panel occurred during the remainder of the second day and the morning of the third day. EVIDENCE: The literature was searched through MEDLINE and an extensive bibliography of references was provided to the panel and the conference audience. Experts prepared abstracts with relevant citations from the literature. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed their conclusions based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. CONSENSUS STATEMENT: The panel composed a draft statement that was read in its entirety and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. There-after, the panel resolved conflicting recommendations and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The panel finalized the revisions within a few weeks after the conference. CONCLUSIONS: All Americans should engage in regular physical activity at a level appropriate to their capacity, needs, and interest. Children and adults alike should set a goal of accumulating at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity physical activity on most, and preferably all, days of the week. Most Americans have little or no physical activity in their daily lives, and accumulating evidence indicates that physical inactivity is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, moderate levels of physical activity confer significant health benefits. Even those who currently meet these daily standards may derive additional health and fitness benefits by becoming more physically active or including more vigorous activity. For those with known cardiovascular disease, cardiac rehabilitation programs that combine physical activity with reduction in other risk factors should be more widely used.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the factors associated with prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of osteoporosis, and to present the most recent information available in these areas. PARTICIPANTS: From March 27-29, 2000, a nonfederal, nonadvocate, 13-member panel was convened, representing the fields of internal medicine, family and community medicine, endocrinology, epidemiology, orthopedic surgery, gerontology, rheumatology, obstetrics and gynecology, preventive medicine, and cell biology. Thirty-two experts from these fields presented data to the panel and an audience of 699. Primary sponsors were the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases and the National Institutes of Health Office of Medical Applications of Research. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE was searched for January 1995 through December 1999, and a bibliography of 2449 references provided to the panel. Experts prepared abstracts for presentations with relevant literature citations. Scientific evidence was given precedence over anecdotal experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel, answering predefined questions, developed conclusions based on evidence presented in open forum and the literature. The panel composed a draft statement, which was read and circulated to the experts and the audience for public discussion. The panel resolved conflicts and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The draft statement was posted on the Web on March 30, 2000, and updated with the panel's final revisions within a few weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Though prevalent in white postmenopausal women, osteoporosis occurs in all populations and at all ages and has significant physical, psychosocial, and financial consequences. Risks for osteoporosis (reflected by low bone mineral density [BMD]) and for fracture overlap but are not identical. More attention should be paid to skeletal health in persons with conditions associated with secondary osteoporosis. Clinical risk factors have an important but poorly validated role in determining who should have BMD measurement, in assessing fracture risk, and in determining who should be treated. Adequate calcium and vitamin D intake is crucial to develop optimal peak bone mass and to preserve bone mass throughout life. Supplementation with these 2 nutrients may be necessary in persons not achieving recommended dietary intake. Gonadal steroids are important determinants of peak and lifetime bone mass in men, women, and children. Regular exercise, especially resistance and high-impact activities, contributes to development of high peak bone mass and may reduce risk of falls in older persons. Assessment of bone mass, identification of fracture risk, and determination of who should be treated are the optimal goals when evaluating patients for osteoporosis. Fracture prevention is the primary treatment goal for patients with osteoporosis. Several treatments have been shown to reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures, including those that enhance bone mass and reduce the risk or consequences of falls. Adults with vertebral, rib, hip, or distal forearm fractures should be evaluated for osteoporosis and given appropriate therapy.

Adult↗