PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.

This study compared the accuracy of one-step putty wash with two-step putty wash impression techniques. Five addition silicone impression materials-Mirror 3 (MR), Mirror 3 Extrude (ME), Express (E), Permagum (P), and Absolute(A)--were tested. A stainless steel model containing two full-crown abutment preparations was used as the positive control. Five replications for one-step and two-step putty wash impressions of the master model were made for each test material. Accuracy of the materials was assessed by measuring six dimensions on stone dies poured from impressions of the master model. Accuracy of addition silicone impression material is affected more by material than technique. Accuracy of the putty wash one-step impression technique was not different from the putty wash two-step impression technique except at one of the six dimensions where one-step was more accurate than two-step. Mirror 3 putty wash two-step impression presented less distortion than Mirror 3 Extrude putty wash one-step or two-step impression.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1993

Effect of loading and syringing on void formation in automixed addition silicone elastomers.

The effect of loading and syringing on void formation in five automixed addition silicones was evaluated by determining the voids created in the first and second halves of material loaded and dispensed from a metal syringe. Impressions were made of a model with six stainless-steel cylinders. The voids were counted at a predetermined site on 3 separate days using a binocular microscope at x 7 magnification. Automixed addition silicones did not confirm the 'last out-fewer bubbles' phenomenon and specific loading and syringing technique did not appear to have a consistent effect on void formation in automixed elastomers.

Dental Impression Materials↗
PubMed1996

A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays.

Clinical success of fixed prosthodontic procedures is dependent in part upon the dimensional accuracy of elastomeric impression materials and impression procedures. Three elastomeric impression materials were used in custom and stock trays to determine the accuracy of impressions taken from an experimental stainless steel model representing premolar and molar bridge abutment preparations. Horizontal and vertical individual abutment and interabutment dimensions were measured on die stone replicas, and the measurements compared with those obtained from stainless steel master models. The results of this study demonstrate polysulphide is the least accurate impression material for both vertical and horizontal individual abutment dimensions. However, for interabutment horizontal dimensions, no statistical differences were noted between impression material types when using a custom tray. Stock trays produced unreliable results for all the materials tested.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1992

Effect of operator variability on void formation in impressions made with an automixed addition silicone.

This study examined voids produced in impressions of an automixed addition-reaction silicone. Two operators took the impressions using material dispensed from either intra-oral tips or an impression syringe. The material was also hand-mixed for comparison. There were no differences in the number of voids in the automixed material dispensed using the intra-oral tip or impression syringe. Automixing produced substantially fewer voids than hand-mixing. There was a significant difference in the number of voids in the impressions made by the two operators.

Dental Impression Materials↗
PubMed1991

Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.

The effect of the relatively high thermal contraction of addition silicones (polyvinylsiloxane) on the accuracy of stone casts was evaluated using the putty/wash relining impression technique and acrylic resin trays. Impressions were made at 37 degrees C and were divided into two groups. One group was poured at room temperature (22 degrees +/- 2 degrees C) and another group was reheated to 37 degrees C before pouring. Measurement of the dimensional changes failed to reveal improved accuracy of the stone casts poured at the same temperature as that reached during impression making. On the basis of this limited sample, it can be concluded that reheating the impression using the putty/wash relining technique did not improve the accuracy of the stone cast.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the deformation of a metallic framework connected to 15 stone casts fabricated using 3 transfer techniques to determine the most accurate impression procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five stone casts were made from polyether impressions of an epoxy resin master model for each transfer technique. Group 1 samples were created by the direct splinted technique (square transfer copings splinted with carbon steel pins and autopolymerizing acrylic resin, custom tray); group 2 samples were made by the direct nonsplinted technique (square transfer copings, custom tray); and group 3 samples were fabricated using the indirect technique (tapered transfer copings, custom tray). Sixteen strain gauges were fixed on the framework to measure the degree of framework deformation for each stone cast. Pairs of strain gauges placed opposite each other constituted 1 channel to read deformation (half Wheatstone bridge). Deformation readings were collected at the 4 segments between abutments in 4 directions (anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior). Deformation data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Tukey test at the .05 and .01 levels of significance. RESULTS: Group 1 samples allowed the most accurate reproduction of analog position compared to the samples made using the other techniques. No significant difference was found between the direct nonsplinted (group 2) and indirect (group 3) techniques. DISCUSSION: Although some studies have evaluated transfer techniques with similar methodology, this study demonstrated the most suitable strain gauge setup to record framework deformations in all directions and simultaneously offset the effects of temperature variation. CONCLUSIONS: The direct splinted technique was the most accurate transfer method for multiple abutments compared to direct nonsplinted and indirect techniques.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of measurement site on the dimensional accuracy of die-forming materials and techniques.

To date, the comparisons of dimensional accuracy of various die materials has been investigated primarily by using a one-dimensional measurement on one die. However, a single measurement may not adequately represent the complex preparations that are encountered frequently in clinical dentistry. This investigation utilized a standardized model with two identical dies to measure die accuracy at four sites, using five different die-forming materials/techniques.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Educational material of dental anatomy applied to study the morphology of permanent teeth.

The purpose of this report is to present educational material that would allow the dental student to learn to easily identify the morphologic characteristics of permanent teeth, and how they fit together (occlusion). In order to do this, macro models of permanent teeth with no attrition were carved in wax and later molded with alginate. These molds were filled with plaster, dental stone and/or cold-cured acrylic resin. The large individual dental stone tooth models were mounted on a wax base, thus obtaining maxillary and mandibular arches which were occluded. These dental arches were molded with plaster or dental stone. The authors suggest that these types of macro models allow an excellent visualization of the morphologic characteristics of permanent teeth and occlusion. Dental students are able to carve the permanent dentition in wax with great facility when they can observe macro models.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Adhesion of restorations to impression materials.

Three impression materials, Impregum, Permadyne, and Reprosil, were tested with three restorative materials, Lodestar, Dispersalloy, and Concise. Polished cylindrical samples of each restorative material with and without a collar design were used for impression retention testing. A pullout test using an Instron machine was used to test the samples that were individually submerged in the impression materials until set. Results show similar behavior for Lodestar and Dispersalloy with and without a collar. Permadyne and Impregum were significantly more retentive with resin composite than was Reprosil. Resin composite was significantly more retentive than the metals. Impression materials may bond with restorative materials, significantly increasing resistance to impression removal.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMed1993

Three-dimensional investigation of the accuracy of impression materials after disinfection.

The influence of the two new disinfection systems Hygojet/MD 520 and Impresept on the accuracy of eight impression materials was evaluated with a clinically relevant abutment arrangement. In addition, an "aseptic" irreversible hydrocolloid was tested under the same test conditions but without the disinfection procedure. The dimensional changes of all eight impression materials related to the disinfection procedures were small. Although statistically significant interactions of the impression materials and the disinfection systems were found, the influence of the two tested disinfection systems on the dimensional accuracy of the impressions does not seem to be clinically relevant. From the standpoint of impression accuracy, both tested disinfection systems and the tested "aseptic" irreversible hydrocolloid can be recommended for clinical and laboratory use.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2005

Reproducibility of sterilized rubber impressions.

Impressions, dentures and other dental appliances may be contaminated with oral micro-flora or other organisms of varying pathogenicity from patient's saliva and blood. Several approaches have been tried to control the transmission of infectious organisms via dental impressions and because disinfection is less effective and has several drawbacks for impression characterization, several sterilization methods have been suggested. This study evaluated the reproducibility of rubber impressions after sterilization by different methods. Dimensional accuracy and wettability of two rubber impression materials (vinyl polysiloxane and polyether) were evaluated after sterilization by each of three well-known methods (immersion in 2% glutaraldehyde for 10 h, autoclaving and microwave radiation). Non-sterilized impressions served as control. The effect of the tray material on impression accuracy and the effect of topical surfactant on the wettability were also evaluated. One-way ANOVA with Dunnett's method was used for statistical analysis. All sterilizing methods reduced the reproducibility of rubber impressions, although not always significantly. Microwave sterilization had a small effect on both accuracy and wettability. The greater effects of the other methods could usually be overcome by using ceramic trays and by spraying impression surfaces with surfactant before pouring the gypsum mix. There was one exception: glutaraldehyde still degraded dimensional accuracy even with ceramic trays and surfactant. We conclude that a) sterilization of rubber impressions made on acrylic trays was usually associated with a degree of dimensional change; b) microwave energy seems to be a suitable technique for sterilizing rubber impressions; c) topical surfactant application helped restore wettability of sterilized impressions.

Ceramics↗
PubMed1998

The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.

While being shipped to a laboratory, impressions can be exposed to excessive temperatures. This study compared the effects of different time and temperature storage conditions, including temperature extremes of 66 C and -10 C, on the accuracy of addition silicone and polyether impressions. The greatest distortion generally occurred as a result of the 66 C temperature extreme. The authors recommend that impressions be poured in stone according to manufacturers' specifications before being shipped to a dental laboratory.

Calcium Sulfate↗
PubMed1991

[Impressions].

The less hydrophobic addition reaction silicones and polyethers are preferable in taking elastomeric impressions for cast restorations. Hydrocolloid is the material of choice in case of a large number of preparations. An accurate impression requires a solid tray. A metal stock tray is money-saving compared to the expensive custom tray. Automix dispensing guns offer a number of practical advantages. Success in impression making rather depends on making proper preparations and correct processing than on impression techniques and the quality of the impression material. Crossinfection via impressions can be prevented by immersion in a sodium hypochlorite solution for ten minutes.

Dental Impression Materials↗
PubMed2006

Applicable research in practice: understanding the hydrophilic and flow property measurements of impression materials.

The flow properties and hydrophilicity of an impression material are key factors that affect its performance. This article details in vitro studies comparing these properties in 1 polyether and several vinyl polysiloxane light-body impression materials. The first series of studies examined the materials' flow properties used in a "shark fin" measurement procedure to determine which exhibited superior flow characteristics. The second series of studies reviewed the hydrophilic properties of the materials. Video analysis was used to record contact angle measurements at the early- and late-stage working times. Results showed 1 polyether material to be more hydrophilic. Applying this knowledge to practice, the authors present a clinical case in which a polyether's superior flow and quality of detail were used to make impressions for a patient receiving 8 single-unit zirconia crowns.

Crowns↗