PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DERMATITIS, CONTACT”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Allergic contact dermatitis from natural latex without contact urticaria.

During the last decade, there have been many reports of immediate-type hypersensitivity to natural latex, resulting in contact urticaria, generalized allergic reactions such as urticaria and Quincke's edema, and asthmatic or anaphylactic reactions. Moreover, delayed-type hypersensitivity to rubber additives such as thiuram and carbamate derivatives is acknowledged to be the main cause of dermatitis in patients working with rubber gloves. We here report on a patient who developed severe dermatitis on his hands and forearms 3 months after he had started working with rubber gloves. Patch tests with rubber additives, skin prick tests and RAST to natural latex were negative. However, a delayed type of hypersensitivity to latex could be shown by a positive patch test. To our knowledge this is the 1st case reported of an isolated contact dermatitis from natural latex without contact urticaria to latex or hypersensitivity to rubber additives. We therefore propose that not only patch tests with rubber additives, but also skin prick and patch tests with latex should be performed in contact dermatitis patients working with rubber gloves.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Chromium induced contact dermatitis and indices for diagnosis.

Chromium exposure plays an important role in development of contact dermatitis. The prevalence of contact dermatitis among tannery workers and cement-exposed workers is high. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of contact dermatitis among some Egyptian workers exposed to chromium and to investigate the role of patch test and IgE immunoassay in diagnosis of contact dermatitis. Eighty-three male workers who were exposed to chromium were selected after application of certain exclusion criteria to be the target population of this study. Forty male workers away from exposure to chromium were taken to be the controls. All the exposed and non exposed workers were investigated through an interview questionnaire, clinical examination, patch test and determination of blood and urine chromium levels, absolute eosinophilic count and total IgE level. The results showed that there was no significant difference between exposed workers with clinically diagnosed contact dermatitis and the clinically free exposed workers regarding age and work duration. 7.7% of exposed workers with positive patch test suffered from contact dermatitis while 31.6% of exposed workers with negative patch test suffered from contact dermatitis. There was no statistically significant difference between clinically diagnosed contact dermatitis workers and clinically free workers regarding blood and urine chromium levels. IgE level and absolute eosinophilic count were statistically higher among exposed workers with contact dermatitis than among clinically free exposed workers. According to the results of this study, it is concluded that the diagnosis of skin hypersensitivity to chromium should depend upon the history of chromium exposure, clinical examination and a battery of investigations including IgE level, eosinophilic count and patch test.

Air Pollutants, Occupational↗
PubMed2001

Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in Singapore.

Singapore has a resident population of 3,000,000 and a workforce of 1,780,000. Most are employed in manufacturing, services and commerce (245,000). From 1996 to 1998, 3472 cases were notified to the Ministry of Manpower and confirmed as occupational diseases. Noise-induced hearing loss accounted for 82% of cases, while only 11% of cases were industrial dermatitis. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis was not common, comprising approximately one third of the 369 cases of industrial dermatitis that were notified. However, we believe that the majority of cases are not notified to the authorities. The main occupational contact allergens were chromates, nickel, rubber chemicals, cutting fluids and resins. Most affected workers were from the construction, electronics and metalworking industries. Case series of occupational dermatoses among electronics and metal workers have been published. Of the cases of occupational dermatoses among electronics workers seen at a tertiary dermatological centre, 41% of 149 had allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). The commonest allergens were nickel, resins and rubber chemicals. In another case series of 252 metalworkers seen at the same dermatological centre, 23% suffered from ACD. The common allergens were metals and cutting fluids. Besides the common causes of ACD, unusual allergens have also been described. One example is ACD to grasses, which is seen mainly among military personnel. Population studies have been conducted in several industries. A survey of 2567 electronics workers revealed a 2% point prevalence of ACD. Of the occupationally relevant cases, 46 were nickel sensitive, 7 reacted to colophony, and 1 case to epoxy resin. A study of 272 prefabrication construction workers showed a 14% prevalence rate of occupational dermatitis. Of the 38 cases, 42% were ACD to chromates and rubber chemicals. Occupational ACD in Singapore is not as uncommon as the reported statistics suggest. Population-based reports, which overcome the problem of under-notification, show that the prevalence is variable in different industries.

Chemical Industry↗
PubMed2003

Experimental systemic contact dermatitis from nickel: a dose-response study.

Systemic contact dermatitis is usually seen as flare-up of previous dermatitis or de novo dermatitis similar to allergic contact dermatitis. Although systemic contact dermatitis from medicaments is a well-established entity, the existence of clinically relevant systemic reactions to oral nickel exposure, in particular systemic reactions to nickel in the daily diet, remains controversial. Several studies have shown that oral exposure to nickel can induce systemic contact dermatitis in nickel-sensitive individuals. In most of these studies, however, the exposure dose of nickel used has been considerably higher than the nickel content in the normal daily diet. The aim of the current investigation was to study dose-response dependency of oral exposure to nickel. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled oral exposure trial, 40 nickel-sensitive persons and 20 healthy (non-nickel-sensitive) controls were given nickel sulfate hexahydrate in doses similar to and greater than the amount of nickel ingested in the normal Danish daily diet. The nickel content in urine and serum before and after oral exposure was measured to determine nickel uptake and excretion. The influence of the amount of nickel ingested on the clinical reactions to oral exposure and on nickel concentrations in serum and urine was evaluated. Among nickel-sensitive individuals, a definite dose-response dependency was seen, following oral exposure to nickel. 7 of 10 nickel-sensitive individuals had cutaneous reactions to oral exposure to 4.0 mg nickel, an amount approximately 10 times greater than the estimated normal daily dietary intake of nickel. 4 of 10 nickel-sensitive individuals had cutaneous reactions to 1.0 mg nickel, a dose which is close to the estimated maximum amount of nickel contained in the daily diet. 4 of 10 nickel-sensitive individuals reacted to 0.3 mg nickel or to the amount equivalent to that contained in a normal daily diet, and 1 of 10 reacted to a placebo. None of the 20 healthy controls had cutaneous reactions to 4.0 mg nickel or to a placebo. Prior to oral exposure, there was no measurable difference in the amount of nickel in the urine or serum of nickel-sensitive persons and healthy controls. Following the oral challenge, the nickel content in the urine and serum of both nickel-sensitive and healthy control individuals was directly related to the dose of nickel ingested.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1983

Contact dermatitis to Synthaderm.

Allergic contact dermatitis is described in 2 patients treated with Synthaderm, a polyurethane covering for leg ulcers. One of the patients was patch tested with 3 extractions made from Synthaderm as well as with 5 isocyanate compounds. Her patch tests were negative to both extractions and isocyanates, but positive to Synthaderm samples with different batch numbers and years of production.

Aged↗
PubMed1987

Contact dermatitis in Nigeria. (IV). Dermatitis of the feet.

Contact dermatitis of the feet is common in Nigeria. 136 patients with dermatitis of the feet were investigated; 83 had positive patch tests. 59 to chemicals in shoes; 22 reacted to rubber chemicals and 16 to chromate, 53 had negative patch tests. The causal mechanisms and treatment methods are described.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1985

Contact dermatitis in cystic fibrosis.

Contact dermatitis has not been previously reported in association with cystic fibrosis. We present the case of a 19-year-old nonatopic patient with cystic fibrosis who experienced erythema and vesicles in an area exposed to nickel.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

The leukocyte migration test in nickel contact dermatitis.

Ten patients with contact dermatitis to nickel, confirmed by patch testing, were investigated by the leukocyte migration test. Specific inhibition of leukocyte migration was obtained with nickel protein complexes. Bovine albumin, human albumin and human epidermis protein were used as carrier proteins in the complexes. Specific inhibition of leukocytes from patients with positive patch test to nickel could not be demonstrated with the hapten alone.

Antigens↗
PubMed1977

[Cytotoxic effect of lymphocytes on peritoneal macrophages of mice in contact dermatitis induced by dinitrochlorbenzene].

Contact dermatitis was induced in BALB/c mice by means of cutaneous application of dinitrochlorbenzol (DNCB) solution. Peritoneal macrophages from DNCB-sensitized and intact mice were cultivated in flat tubes for 48 hours after the 20th day of the experiment, when the DNCB cutaneous test became positive. A suspension of the peripheral lymph node lymphocytes was added to this culture. The lymphocytes fromthe DNCB-sensitized mice had a cytotoxic effect (CTE) on the target cells (peritoneal macrophages) during the co-incubation; the STE was tested with trypane blue in 48 hours. No macrophage lysis was observed in combined incubation of cells from the intact mice.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Shoe contact dermatitis.

In the context of contact dermatitis of a none professional character, the shoe allergic contact dermatitis has been mentioned in the literature for many years, in spite of not being frequent. During the last 15 years, our Department of Dermatology has accumulated a certain experience (225 cases) of this. The results have shown that the incriminated allergens have changed during this time.

Allergens↗
PubMed2003

Occupational issues of irritant contact dermatitis.

Occupational irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), a non-immunological cutaneous inflammatory response to a workplace substance, comprises a major portion of occupational dermatoses in industrialized societies, resulting in considerable social and economic implications. The sheer morphological variety of ICD presents a diagnostic and classification challenge; ideotypes identified to date include acute, chronic and cumulative irritant dermatitis, delayed acute irritant dermatitis, irritant reaction, pustular irritant dermatitis, suberythematous irritation, sensory irritation, friction dermatitis and airborne dermatitis. Hand dermatitis is the most frequent manifestation of occupational ICD. This article reviews the various types of ICD, the epidemiological data available to date, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of ICD, emphasizing occupational issues.

Dermatitis, Irritant↗
PubMed2002

Natural vegetable fats in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis.

Chronic irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) is one of the most pressing problems in occupational medicine and is common in the food processing industry. To date, protective creams that fulfil the special requirements in the foodstuffs industry have not been available. Therefore, we studied the efficacy of pre-exposure application of natural vegetable fats in the prevention of experimentally induced ICD. A panel of 20 healthy volunteers was tested with a repetitive irritation test using sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) as a standard irritant in a randomized study. Application sites were assessed clinically and by the use of bioengineering techniques (evaporimetry, chromametry, and corneometry). Rape seed and palm fats showed significant protective potential. Gas-chromatographic analysis revealed differences in the fatty acid composition of the vegetable. Higher content of linoleic acid and lower content of oleic acid was associated with beneficial effects. Our results are a new approach in the prevention of ICD and towards the development of new protective preparations for workplaces in the foodstuffs industry.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Clues to an accurate diagnosis of contact dermatitis.

An accurate diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis can be achieved by a combination of historical, morphologic, and diagnostic steps. Clues in the history and physical examination can point to an irritant as the source of contact dermatitis. While irritants and allergens share many common features both immunologically and clinically, there are grounds for the distinction. Knowledge of occupational factors is necessary to assess the source of contact dermatitis. A common pitfall is the failure to appreciate the role of endogenous factors in the clinical presentation and overall care of the dermatitis patient. A comprehensive assessment of the patient's environment will lead to appropriate patch tests being applied and a correct diagnosis being reached.

Allergens↗
PubMed2002

Irritant contact dermatitis: is there an immunologic component?

Irritant contact dermatitis (ICD) describes a multifactorial disease resulting from exposure to occupational irritants. Though often characterized as a localized reaction, there are at least 10 forms of ICD, several of which possess systemic involvement. The exact mode of irritant action in ICD is not completely understood, but recent literature suggests that an immunologic-like component may be present. The correlation between the morphology, clinical manifestations and chemokines involved in allergic contact dermatitis and irritant contact dermatitis will be discussed and studies indicating an irritant "immunologic-like" response will be reviewed and analyzed.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

[Histamine reactivity of affected and unaffected skin in endogenous eczema and in chronic allergic contact dermatitis].

In 30 patients with atopic dermatitis and 40 with allergic contact dermatitis in the chronic stage intracutaneous tests were performed with 0.1 ml histamine 1:10,000 in affected and non-affected skin. The erythematous and wheal reactions were compared with 40 age- and sex-matched controls. The diameters of the erythema and wheals were significantly reduced in affected and non-affected skin of the atopic dermatitis (p less than 0.01). In allergic contact dermatitis only the erythema of the affected and non-affected skin was reduced (p less than 0.05), but not the wheal reaction. The erythematous reaction was, however, less reduced in non-affected skin than in the affected one of the allergic contact dermatitis (p less than 0.05). The reduced histamine reactivity seems to be a typical basic mechanism in atopic dermatitis. It is suggested to be due to the histamine mediated immune modulation and the increased release from mast cells, leading to a refractory behaviour of histamine receptors of the blood vessels like in tachyphylaxis. It is interpreted as a secondary phenomenon in allergic contact dermatitis. Although the histamine reaction shows differences for the groups of patients, it is not suitable to discriminate single cases.

Dermatitis↗
PubMed2005

Cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin modulate dendritic cell function in the elicitation phase of allergic contact dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Cilomilast and tacrolimus as well as rapamycin are potential drugs for the treatment of allergic skin diseases like atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: To compare the in vitro and in vivo immunomodulatory effects of the phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor cilomilast with those of tacrolimus and rapamycin. METHODS: The in vitro action of cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin were tested in a mixed leucocyte reaction (MLR). In vivo, the inhibitory action of the immunomodulatory drugs was compared in the toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI)-induced allergic inflammatory response with particular focus on dendritic cell (DC) function. RESULTS: Cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin were all able to inhibit DC-mediated T-cell activation in a MLR. But it was demonstrated for cilomilast that the target cells are T cells rather than DC. In vivo, a combination of systemic and topical administration of each of these three substances significantly inhibited swelling in the murine ear 16 h after TDI challenge. There was also a reduction in the weight of the draining auricular lymph node, in lymphocyte cell count, and in the number of emigrated DC. The density of Langerhans cells in the epidermis was correspondingly higher in mice treated with cilomilast, tacrolimus and rapamycin than in those treated with vehicle. All three substances were found to inhibit DC migration ex vivo in a skin DC migration assay performed on ear tissue after TDI challenge. CONCLUSIONS: DC migration into the draining lymph node also takes place in the elicitation phase of allergic contact dermatitis and this migration can be influenced by tacrolimus and rapamycin, and, to a lesser extent, by cilomilast.

Animals↗
PubMed1982

Experimental photoallergic contact dermatitis: a mouse model.

We have induced photoallergic contact dermatitis in mice to 3,3',4',5 tetrachlorosalicylanilide (TCSA), chlorpromazine and 6-methylcoumarin. These compounds are known to produce photoallergic contact dermatitis in humans. The photoallergic contact dermatitis reaction in the mouse is immunologically specific viz. mice photosensitized to TCSA react, by photochallenge, to that compound and not to chlorpromazine, and conversely. The reaction requires UVA at both sensitization and challenge. It appears to be T-cell mediated in that it can be passively transferred to syngeneic mice by lymph node cells from actively sensitized mice, the histology of the reactions resembles that of classic allergic contact dermatitis in mice, challenge reactions are seen at 24 but not at 4 hr, and photoallergic contact dermatitis can be induced in B-cell deficient mice. The availability of a mouse model for the study of photo-ACD will facilitate the identification of pertinent control mechanisms and may aid in the management of the disease. It is likely that a bioassay for photoallergens of humans can be based on this mouse model.

Animals↗