PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Drug Utilization”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources
PubMed1987

Psychotropic drug utilization and audit in two Italian psychiatric services.

The utilization of psychotropic drugs is a topic of increasing interest. This paper describes a study of psychotropic drug use in two acute psychiatric in-patient services in Cremona, northern Italy. Almost all patients surveyed received one or more psychotropic drugs, and there was evidence of a substantial level of polypharmacy. Women patients were prescribed more psychotropic drugs than the men, while the relationship between drug prescription and psychiatric diagnosis differed between the two services. During the second phase of the study, the medical staff were aware that their prescribing was being monitored. However, this knowledge appeared to have little effect on their patterns of prescribing. The findings of Barton (1978) are thus not supported.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Michigan drug utilization review and OBRA 90.

The DUR Board's role in the Medicaid DUR process is significant. With the requirements for membership on the DUR Board and the responsibilities directed by OBRA 90, the standards will ensure that they reflect the accepted medical practice and are clinically relevant to the geographical area represented. The DUR Board has the potential to improve drug utilization review and ultimately improve the quality of care. The approval of criteria for both patient retrospective and prospective DUR and the addition of education intervention will help us to improve the quality of care. DSS encourages your input and participation on the DUR regional committees. There are currently three committees that meet monthly and are located in: Detroit, Ann Arbor, Lansing.

Drug Utilization Review↗
PubMed1984

Drug utilization in paediatrics: non-medical factors affecting decision making by prescribers.

The study was done to show that in certain areas of paediatric pharmacotherapy unexpected discrepancies may arise between accepted therapeutic principles and the actual behaviour of a prescribing doctor. The first example was of a great reduction in penicillin use in a university teaching hospital after certain therapeutic accidents: in one year, there were 2 fatal cases of rhabdomyolysis due to use of procaine benzyl-penicillin. Other antimicrobial drugs inferior to penicillin, such as lincomycin and sulphonamides, replaced penicillins. The second example showed the inverse relationship between the use of antitussives and other drugs in symptomatic treatment of respiratory diseases in outpatients and inpatients; the pressure of unduly optimistic expectations of therapy imposes a high prescribing rate of these drugs in the outpatient population, in contrast to hospitalized patients, whose doctors, being spared such pressure, prescribe antitussives far less often. The third example demonstrates the possibility of inadequate education in the use of antimicrobial drugs. Although doctors from regional hospitals receive their training at an university hospital, they tend to prescribe chloramphenicol ten times more per bed-day than their colleagues in an university hospital. In terms of the cost/effectiveness ratio, a high prescribing rate of cephalosporins is not economically favourable in a university teaching hospital. It is also shown that studies of drug utilization in children are feasible if age--appropriate adaptation of the statistical value expressed as the defined daily dose is performed. The adaptation was evaluated by comparing pharmacy-based drug consumption data expressed in "paediatric defined daily doses", with actual days of treatment with particular drugs, i.e. data from patient records for 244 beds in the University Teaching Hospital.

Ambulatory Care↗
PubMed1998

Treatment of Medicaid patients with asthma: comparison with treatment guidelines using disease-based drug utilization review methodology.

OBJECTIVE: To compare asthma drug therapy in the Iowa Medicaid population with international treatment guideline recommendations and relate differences to patient outcomes. METHODS: Data on asthma drug therapy and respiratory-related medical services (clinic visits, emergency visits, hospital admissions) were abstracted from prescription claims and diagnostic codes of adult Iowa Medicaid patients with asthma (n = 1029). RESULTS: About two-thirds of the population received a prescription for a short-acting beta 2-agonist during the study period. Patients with greater daily use of short-acting beta 2-agonists had more clinic visits (p = 0.004), likely related to illness severity. Almost one-third (29.3%) of 58 patients receiving a prescription of salmeterol did not receive the recommended prescription of a short-acting beta 2-agonist inhaler in the 6-month period. About one-half of patients who should have been prescribed inhaled corticosteroids according to the international guidelines did not receive such a prescription in the 6-month study period. Increased use of inhaled corticosteroids was associated with fewer (p = 0.04) emergency visits. CONCLUSIONS: Suboptimal asthma treatment in the Iowa Medicaid population, especially in regard to the use of inhaled corticosteroids as preventive therapy, was evident after comparison with treatment guidelines. Increased daily use of inhaled corticosteroids was associated with positive patient outcomes in accordance with guideline recommendations. Educational efforts to improve closer adherence to international guidelines both in prescribing practices and patient compliance with medication for asthma management should be undertaken.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1990

[Parallels in drug utilization--II].

The author analyzes indicators of drug consumption at the regional level in the CSSR and the main towns. The analysis covers the period from 1971-1985 and pertains to the following indicators: A. Expenditure on drugs per day of treatment by functional types of health institutions. B. per capita expenditure on drugs and C. expenditure on drugs. From the indicators dynamic time series are elaborated and the analysis is focused on the development in the past. The author presents basic indices, mean coefficients of growth and parameters characterizing the development in a multiple way. Statistical testing of parallelisms between the obtained developmental parameters reveals factors which influence drug consumption in the investigated territories.

Czechoslovakia↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of alternative models of prescription drug utilization.

The two-part estimation technique has been advocated for estimating models using individual level health care utilization data characterised by a large proportion of non-consumption and small proportions of heavy users. This paper compares the two-part model to several other estimators, including the Poisson, negative binomial and 'zero altered' negative binomial models on the basis of within-sample forecasting accuracy and non-nested model selection tests. The empirical model estimates the differential effect of the removal of copayments for prescription medicines on the prescription drug utilization by older adults with differing levels of health status. The two-part estimator of this model is found to dominate the competitors. Results from this model indicate that utilization increases appear to be higher among individuals with lower levels of health status.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Construction of the Korea Elderly Pharmacoepidemiologic Cohort: drug utilization review of cephalosporins in geriatric inpatients.

We performed a cohort-based pharmacoepidemiologic study in order to evaluate the pattern of cephalosporin prescriptions in elderly inpatients in Korea. The Korea Elderly Pharmacoepidemiologic Cohort was composed of a geriatric population of beneficiaries of the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation residing in Busan in 1993. The cohort consisted of 23,649 members, comprising 15,221 women (64.4%) and 8428 men (35.6%). The study population for drug utilization review consisted of those cohort members who were admitted into hospitals during the period January 1993 through December 1994. The number of hospitalized patients was 4262, comprising 2631 women (61.7%) and 1681 men (38.3%). The trend of cephalosporin prescriptions over the 2-year period showed that the use of second and third generation cephalosporins increased relative to the use of first generation. The use of cephalosporins combined with other antibiotics was found to occur in 22.8% aminoglycosides (76.7%) and quinolones (17.1%) being the most common antibiotics combined with cephalosporins. Our result demonstrates an increase in the prescription of second and third generation cephalosporins in Korea, which has implications not only for the elderly population but also for the total population because of the impact on health care costs and the potential for the emergence of antimicrobial resistance.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1997

The potential for Simpson's paradox in drug utilization studies.

PURPOSE: Simpson's paradox is a type of severe confounding wherein a confounding variable changes the direction of an association. METHODS: This article demonstrates Simpson's paradox with three cohorts of naproxen users (new users, chronic users, and combined users) who were compared on the age/sex distribution of further naproxen use. Hypothetical new and chronic user populations were constructed with the same proportions for further naproxen use as their original counterparts. RESULTS: The hypothetical combined population showed an age/sex distribution opposite to that of the original combined population. CONCLUSIONS: This example of Simpson's paradox is a significant finding as many drug utilization studies do not distinguish between component populations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Impact of 3-tier pharmacy benefit design and increased consumer cost-sharing on drug utilization.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate responsiveness of prescription demand within 9 therapeutic classes to increased cost-sharing compared with constant cost-sharing. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective prescription claims analysis. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2001, 3 benefit plans changed from a 2-tier to a 3-tier design (cases); 1 plan kept a 2-tier design (controls). Study subjects needed 24 months of continuous coverage and a prescription filled < OR = 3 months before the benefit change for a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID), a cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitor, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, a calcium-channel blocker (CCB), an angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), a statin, or a triptan. Changes in use were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Elasticity of demand among cases was calculated. RESULTS: Generally, medication possession ratios decreased for cases and increased for controls between 1999 and 2000. Switch rates increased for cases and decreased for controls for all classes but CCBs. Switches to lower copayments for ACE inhibitors, statins, and triptans occurred more often for cases. Discontinuation-rate changes for cases were 2 to 8 times those for controls. Generic-substitution rates depended on availability and initial generic utilization. Elasticity of demand for drugs was generally low, -0.16 to -0.10, for asymptomatic conditions (ACE inhibitors, ARBs, CCBs, statins), and moderate, -0.60 to -0.24, for symptomatic conditions (COX-2 inhibitors, NSAIDs, triptans, SSRIs). CONCLUSION: Use of retail prescription medications within 9 specific therapeutic classes decreased as copayment increased. Demand for pharmaceuticals was relatively inelastic with these copayment increases.

Cost Sharing↗
PubMed2000

Drug utilization evaluation of nonprescription H2-receptor antagonists and alginate-containing preparations for dyspepsia.

AIMS: To evaluate the use, efficacy and adverse effects of nonprescription H2-receptor antagonists and alginate-containing preparations obtained from community pharmacies. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to customers from 39 pharmacies in Scotland and Wales. RESULTS: Of 767 customers recruited, 608 (79.3%) returned an initial questionnaire and 472 (61.5%) customers a second questionnaire. The vast majority of respondents (424, 69.7%) had suffered their symptoms on three or more occasions and 369 (60.7%) had previously tried medicines to relieve their symptoms. Referrals to a doctor were less frequent than recommended in guidelines and few of those who were referred actually saw a doctor. Over a quarter of those returning the second questionnaire claimed to be taking more than one product simultaneously for symptom control. Eight customers who were taking prescribed ulcer-healing drugs obtained H2-receptor antagonists. The majority of respondents (355/472, 75. 2%) obtained some or complete symptom relief using the product obtained and 369/472 (78.2%) were completely satisfied with their product. H2-receptor antagonists were more likely to produce complete relief of symptoms than alginate-containing preparations (P < 0.05). Only 14 respondents (3.0%) reported side-effects from the product used which were mostly gastro-intestinal. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated that drug utilization studies are feasible to carry out in a community pharmacy setting. While the results support published evidence of the efficacy and minimal toxicity of these products, they also highlight the possibility of H2-receptor antagonists being used outwith their licenced indications.

Adult↗