SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Meropenem”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Comparative in-vitro activity of meropenem against selected pathogens from hospitalized patients in The Netherlands. MASTIN Study Group.

Thirty laboratories evaluated the in-vitro activity of meropenem and 15 commonly used antibiotics against selected microorganisms isolated in 1994-95 from hospitalized patients with serious infections requiring antibacterial treatment. Isolates (2169) from blood, sputum, pus or CSF were included. MICs were determined with Etest and NCCLS breakpoints were used. In general, the MICs of meropenem for Gram-positive isolates were found to be one- to six-fold higher than those of imipenem, except for Enterococcus faecalis. The MIC90 of meropenem for E. faecalis was high (32 mg/L) and distinctly higher than the MIC90 of imipenem (2 mg/L). The MICs of meropenem for Gram-negative isolates were two- to 24-fold lower, with the exception of Acinetobacter spp. Gram-negative fermentative strains, Enterobacter spp. in particular, isolated from patients in intensive care units (ICU) were more resistant to the -lactam antibiotics than those isolated from patients in non-intensive care wards. However, all Enterobacteriaceae, with and without inducible -lactamases, isolated from ICU patients were susceptible to meropenem.

Enterobacteriaceae↗

PubMed1998

In-vitro selection of porin-deficient mutants of two strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem, but not to imipenem.

We have evaluated the ability of imipenem and meropenem to select, in vitro, resistant mutants of two clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing both SHV and TEM beta-lactamases. Only meropenem selected mutants of both isolates for which the MICs of meropenem, but not imipenem, were markedly higher than those for the parent strains; the MICs of several other beta-lactam antibiotics, including beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, for these mutants were also higher than those for the parent strains. In contrast, the MICs for the imipenem-selected mutants were the same as, or similar to, those for the parent strains. Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis revealed that an outer membrane protein in both parent strains was absent in the meropenem-selected mutants, but not in the imipenem-selected mutants. This protein is likely to be a porin, the absence of which is presumably associated with impaired beta-lactam permeability and, therefore, the reduced susceptibilities to these antibiotics exhibited by the mutant strains. We believe that this is the first report of the in-vitro selection of porin-deficient mutants of K. pneumoniae following exposure to meropenem.

Drug Resistance, Microbial↗

PubMed2001

In vitro and in vivo activities of meropenem and comparable antimicrobial agents against Haemophilus influenzae, including beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant strains.

The in vitro activity of ampicillin, cefotaxime, meropenem, panipenem, imipenem and biapenem was assayed using ampicillin-susceptible, beta-lactamase-positive and beta-lactamase-negative ampicillin-resistant (BLNAR) Haemophilus influenzae isolated recently in Japan. Against ampicillin-susceptible isolates, cefotaxime was the most potent (MIC(90) 0.016 mg/mL). Both cefotaxime and meropenem (MIC(90) of both, 0.5 mg/L) were the most potent against beta-lactamase-positive isolates. Against BLNAR isolates, meropenem (MIC(90) 0.5 mg/L) was the most potent. In murine bronchopneumonia caused by ampicillin-susceptible and BLNAR H. influenzae, cefotaxime showed the best efficacy, followed by meropenem. Our results indicate that meropenem could be a useful intravenous agent for infections caused by H. influenzae, including BLNAR strains.

Ampicillin Resistance↗

PubMed2005

Modelling time-kill studies to discern the pharmacodynamics of meropenem.

OBJECTIVES: Time-kill studies are commonly used in investigations of new antimicrobial agents. However, they typically provide descriptive information on pharmacodynamics. We developed a mathematical model to capture the relationship between microbial burden and antimicrobial agent concentrations. METHODS: Time-kill studies were performed with 10(8) cfu/mL of Pseudomonas aeruginosa at baseline. Meropenem at 0, 0.25, 1, 4, 16 and 64 x MIC was used (MIC = 1 mg/L). Serial samples were obtained to quantify bacterial burden over 24 h. The data were analysed by a population analysis using the non-parametric adaptive grid program. The rate of change of bacteria over time was expressed as the difference between linear bacterial growth rate and sigmoidal kill rate. Regrowth was attributed to adaptation, which was explicitly modelled as increase in C(50k) (concentration to achieve 50% maximal kill rate), using a saturable function of selective pressure (both meropenem concentration and time). RESULTS: The best-fit model consisted of eight parameters and the fit to the data was satisfactory. The r2 of maximum a-posteriori probability Bayesian predictions based on the mean parameter estimates was 0.984. Maximal killing rate at baseline was found to be 4.7 h(-1); C(90k) was achieved with meropenem at 5.0 mg/L. The model was validated by time-kill studies using 2x and 32x MIC of meropenem. CONCLUSIONS: Our model reasonably described and predicted the time course of P. aeruginosa in time-kill studies, and provided quantitative information on the pharmacodynamics of meropenem. The structural model appeared robust and could be used to provide a realistic expectation of the killing performance of antimicrobial agents.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2005

Activity of three {beta}-lactams (ertapenem, meropenem and ampicillin) against intraphagocytic Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the activity of three beta-lactams [ertapenem (a carbapenem with a prolonged half-life), meropenem and ampicillin] against intraphagocytic Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: Quantitative measurements of cfu changes in broth and in THP-1 macrophages (post-phagocytosis) over time (5 and 24 h) at concentrations spanning from sub-MICs to C(max) (maximal concentration typically observed in patients' serum upon administration of conventional doses); morphological studies using an electron microscope; evaluation of drug stability (HPLC), protein binding (equilibrium dialysis) and measurement of drug cellular accumulation (microbiological assay). RESULTS: Ertapenem was unable to control L. monocytogenes growth in THP-1 macrophages at all concentrations and times tested, even under conditions where ampicillin and meropenem were bactericidal. This behaviour could not be ascribed to drug instability, protein binding or lack of cell accumulation in comparison with ampicillin or meropenem. Ertapenem, ampicillin and meropenem were equally effective at reducing the post-phagocytosis inoculum of S. aureus ( approximately 1 log cfu), and caused conspicuous changes in the morphology of intracellular bacteria consistent with their lysis. These effects were obtained, however, only at large multiples (100-fold or more) of the MIC maintained over 24 h. Because of the high intrinsic antimicrobial potency of the beta-lactams studied, these concentrations were below the C(max). CONCLUSIONS: Ertapenem will probably be ineffective against intraphagocytic forms of L. monocytogenes for reasons that remain to be discovered. Conversely, ertapenem could be an alternative to ampicillin and meropenem against intraphagocytic S. aureus since its longer half-life may allow high concentrations to be maintained for more prolonged times.

Ampicillin↗

PubMed2000

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in intensive care unit patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an intravenous meropenem dosage regimen in adult intensive care patients with acute renal failure treated by continuous renal replacement therapy. DESIGN: A prospective, clinical study. SETTING: General intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Ten critically ill adult patients being treated with meropenem and receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (hemofiltration rates, 1-2 L/hr) (n = 5) or continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (hemofiltration rates, 1-1.5 L/hr; dialysis rates, 1-1.5 L/hr) (n = 5) via a polyacrylonitrile hollow fiber 0.9-m2 filter. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received a meropenem dose of 1 g iv every 12 hrs as a 5-min bolus. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Meropenem concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in serum taken at timed intervals and in ultrafiltrate/dialysate to determine serum concentration-time profiles, derive pharmacokinetic variable estimates, and determine sieving coefficients and filter clearances. The serum concentrations were examined to see whether they were above the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for pathogens that may be encountered in intensive care patients. Serum concentrations exceeded 4 mg/L (MIC90 for Pseudomonas aeruginosa) during 67% of the dosage period in all patients. Sub-MIC90 concentrations were obtained in three patients immediately before treatment and in one patient 12 hrs after treatment. Mean (SD) (n = 10) pharmacokinetic variable estimates were as follows: elimination half-life, 5.16 hrs (1.83 hrs); volume of distribution, 0.35 L/kg (0.10 L/kg); and total clearance, 4.30 L/hr (1.38 L/hr). A sieving coefficient of 0.93 (0.06) (n = 9) indicated free flow across the filter. The fraction cleared by the extracorporeal route was 48% (13%) (n = 9), which is clinically important. CONCLUSIONS: A meropenem dose of 1g iv every 12 hrs provides adequate serum concentrations in the majority of patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration or continuous venovenous hemofiltration with a 0.9-m2 polyacrylonitrile filter at combined ultrafiltrate/dialysate flow rates of up to 3 L/hr. A lower dose would not be sufficient for the empirical treatment of potentially life-threatening infections in all patients.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMed2002

Penetration of meropenem and cefepim into pancreatic tissue during the course of experimental acute pancreatitis.

INTRODUCTION: Recent data from experimental and clinical studies suggest that the antibiotics showing good penetration into the pancreas may reduce mortality by preventing pancreatic infection, which is the most important prognostic factor in acute pancreatitis. AIM: To determine and compare pancreatic tissue concentrations of meropenem and cefepime at different stages of acute necrotizing pancreatitis in an animal model that has been shown to closely mimic severe human pancreatitis. METHODOLOGY: Acute necrotizing pancreatitis was induced in rats by a standardized intraductal infusion of glycodeoxycholic acid and intravenous cerulein. Six hours (n = 30) and 48 hours (n = 30) after induction of pancreatitis, the rats were randomized to receive an intravenous 20 mg/kg injection of either meropenem or cefepime. Blood and the head of the pancreas were collected for determining antibiotic concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Meropenem concentrations in the pancreas at 6 hours of acute pancreatitis increased significantly and decreased at 48 hours of the disease, but were still higher than that in controls. Concentrations of cefepime in necrotic pancreatic tissue were significantly low either during the initial or later phase, but lower in latter, in which the necrosis was more evident. Tissue/serum concentration ratios of meropenem were significantly higher than those of cefepime. However, tissue concentrations of both antibiotics are much higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration values for the common microorganisms involved in pancreatic infections. CONCLUSION: Although both antibiotics penetrate into the necrotic tissue in sufficient therapeutic concentrations, penetration of meropenem is much better than cefepime. However, good tissue penetration may not solely indicate efficacy of that antibiotic. Therefore, further experimental and clinical studies are needed to determine the therapeutic and prognostic efficacy of these agents.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Epileptic seizures caused by low valproic acid levels from an interaction with meropenem.

A 55-year-old woman was diagnosed with pneumonia and was treated with meropenem; 5 days later she developed epileptic seizures. She had been treated with valproic acid for 16 years to control her epileptic seizures. Her serum valproic acid concentration was low during treatment with meropenem than previously recorded despite an increase of valproic dose. As soon as administration of meropenem was withdrawn, valproic acid concentration increased to previous levels and her seizures stopped. Meropenem decreases valproic acid concentration, and may promote the development of epileptic seizures in previously controlled epileptic patients. The acute lowering of serum valproate produced by meropenem probably precludes their concomitant use.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed1993

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in patients with various degrees of renal function, including patients with end-stage renal disease.

The pharmacokinetics of meropenem were studied after intravenous infusion in 13 patients grouped according to the impairment of their renal function. Creatinine clearance (CLCR) was greater than 50, 50 to 30, and less than 30 ml/min in groups I, II, and III, respectively. Two other groups, groups IV and V, each comprising four patients with end-stage renal disease (CLCR, < 5 ml/min), were also studied, the former on days off of hemodialysis and the latter on days of hemodialysis. The elimination half-lives of meropenem were 1.54 +/- 0.70 h in group I patients, 3.36 +/- 1.02 h in group II patients, and 5.00 +/- 1.05 h in group III patients. Cumulative urinary excretion accounted for 48.5% of the dose in group I patients and decreased progressively with a decline in renal function. Hemodialysis shortened the elimination half-life of meropenem from 7.0 h to 2.9 h. H-4295, the main metabolite of meropenem, had a peak level in plasma of 0.5 to 1.0 h in patients with renal failure. The level of H-4295 decreased with hemodialysis. The dosing interval of meropenem should be prolonged in a regular proportion to the decline in CLCR (12 h in group II patients and 24 h in group III patients). In patients receiving hemodialysis, dosing after each hemodialysis session is recommended.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in patients with intra-abdominal infections.

Noncompartmental and compartmental analyses of meropenem disposition in patients receiving 1-g intravenous intermittent infusions every 8 h were performed. Twelve patients (one woman and 11 men) participated in the meropenem pharmacokinetic analysis. Operative findings included perforated appendicitis (five patients), gangrenous appendicitis (five patients), peri-appendical abscess (one patient), and gunshot wound to the abdomen (one patient). The most common associated adverse drug reactions to meropenem were diarrhea and increased liver enzymes. The estimated noncompartmental pharmacokinetic parameters, mean +/- standard deviation, are as follows: maximum drug concentration in plasma, 47.58 +/- 17.59 micrograms/ml; half-life, 1.04 +/- 0.19 h; elimination rate constant, 0.68 +/- 0.12 h-1; area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity, 57.5 +/- 20.12 micrograms x ml/h; total plasma clearance, 315.40 +/- 71.94 ml/min; renal clearance, 136.7 +/- 89.20 ml/min; volume of distribution at steady state, 26.68 +/- 6.88 liters; and mean residence time, 1.47 +/- 0.28 h. The two-compartment model best described meropenem disposition in our patients. Our findings differed from estimates for healthy volunteers possibly because of the physiologic changes as a result of surgery. Our findings suggest that meropenem (1,000 mg) administered intravenously every 8 h provides adequate concentrations for most intra-abdominal infections.

Abdomen↗

PubMed1996

Comparative in vitro pharmacodynamics of imipenem and meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

MICs are commonly used to assess the in vitro activities of antimicrobial agents; however, they provide minimal information on the pattern of bacterial activities. Time-kill studies with extensive sampling allow assessment of both the rate and extent of bacterial killing and regrowth. We compared imipenem and meropenem by both MIC-MBC testing and a time-kill study with P. aeruginosa 27853. In the time-kill study, concentration/MIC ratios ranging from 0.0625 to 32 times the MIC were studied. The kill rate, time to 99.9% kill, doubling time of regrowth, and area under the bacterial killing curve (AUKC) were evaluated. Degradation during the testing procedure was accounted for by assessing actual drug exposure as determined by the area under the concentration-time curve. Pharmacodynamic parameters were compared by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The modal MIC and MBC for imipenem were 2 and 4 micrograms/ml, respectively, and those for meropenem were 0.25 and 0.5 microgram/ml, respectively. In the time-kill study, both agents displayed concentration-dependent activity over a range of 0.25 to 4 times the MIC. Initial killing (0 to 1 h) was faster with imipenem at the same concentration/MIC ratios (P = 0.0506). The time to 99.9% kill was approximately 5 h for both agents. When regrowth occurred, the doubling rate for imipenem, which was the same as that for the growth control, was twice as rapid as that for meropenem. At the same concentrations, the AUKCs over 24 h were lower for meropenem than for imipenem (P = 0.0280); however, when normalized by MIC, imipenem resulted in smaller AUKCs. Comparison of plots of area under the concentration-time curve versus AUKC, which accounted for drug degradation and actual drug exposure, revealed that meropenem was three times more active than imipenem, rather than the eightfold difference suggested by MICs. Time-kill curves with extensive sampling and measurement of actual drug exposure, rather than traditional MIC testing, may more accurately assess differences in the in vitro activities of antimicrobial agents.

Cell Division↗

PubMed1999

Comparative in vitro activities of meropenem, imipenem, temocillin, piperacillin, and ceftazidime in combination with tobramycin, rifampin, or ciprofloxacin against Burkholderia cepacia isolates from patients with cystic fibrosis.

We evaluated the activities of meropenem, imipenem, temocillin, piperacillin, and ceftazidime by determination of the MICs for 66 genotypically characterized Burkholderia cepacia isolates obtained from the sputum of cystic fibrosis patients. In vitro synergy assays, as performed by the time-kill methodology, of two- and three-drug combinations of the beta-lactams with tobramycin, rifampin, and/or ciprofloxacin were also performed with 10 strains susceptible, intermediate, or resistant to fluoroquinolones. On the basis of the MICs, meropenem and temocillin were the most active beta-lactam agents, with MICs at which 90% of isolates are inhibited of 8 and 32 micrograms/ml, respectively. The addition of ciprofloxacin significantly enhanced the killing activities of piperacillin, imipenem, and meropenem against the 10 strains tested (P < 0.05). The best killing activity was obtained with the combination of meropenem and ciprofloxacin, with bactericidal activity of 3.31 +/- 0.36 log10 CFU/ml (P < 0.05). Compared to the activity of the two-drug beta-lactam-ciprofloxacin combination, the addition of rifampin or tobramycin did not significantly increase the killing activity (P > 0.05). The three-drug combinations (with or without ciprofloxacin) significantly enhanced the killing activities of piperacillin, imipenem, and meropenem relative to the activities of the beta-lactams used alone (P < 0.05). The combination beta-lactam-ciprofloxacin-tobramycin was the combination with the most consistently synergistic effect.

Burkholderia Infections↗

PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem, administered at 500 milligrams every 8 hours, in plasma and cantharidin-induced skin blister fluid.

The pharmacokinetic disposition of meropenem, administered at 500 mg every 8 h, in plasma and cantharidin-induced blister fluid is described. Peak meropenem concentrations in blister fluid lagged behind peak meropenem concentrations in plasma, while a lower elimination rate from blister fluid was also noted. The mean penetration of meropenem into blister fluid was 67%. The pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem in blister fluid supports the utility of this dose in the management of skin and soft tissue infections.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of meropenem in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia following administration by 3-hour infusion or bolus injection.

The time that concentrations in serum are above the MIC (T>MIC) is the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter correlating with the therapeutic efficacy of beta-lactam antibiotics. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the T>MIC of meropenem when administered by a 3-h infusion compared with that when administered by bolus injection. The study was conducted with nine patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia. Each subject received meropenem in three regimens consecutively: (i) bolus injection of 1 g every 8 h for 24 h; (ii) 3-h infusion of 1 g every 8 h for 24 h; and (iii) 3-h infusion of 2 g every 8 h for 24 h. Following bolus injection, the percentages of the T>MICs of 16, 8, 4, and 1 microg/ml were 28.33% +/- 11.67%, 45.89% +/- 22.90%, 57.00% +/- 24.82%, and 74.67% +/- 17.94% of an 8-h interval, respectively. For the 3-h infusion of 1 g of meropenem, the percentages of the T>MICs of 16, 8, 4, and 1 microg/ml were 37.78% +/- 20.57%, 58.11% +/- 24.38%, 72.67% +/- 21.97%, and 93.56% +/- 6.84% of an 8-h interval, respectively. For the 3-h infusion of 2 g of meropenem, the percentages of the T>MICs of 16, 8, 4, and 1 microg/ml were 57.89% +/- 24.26%, 72.89% +/- 22.40%, 85.56% +/- 16.42%, and 98.56% +/- 3.28% of an 8-h interval, respectively. In conclusion, a 3-h infusion resulted in greater T>MICs than those after a bolus injection. For the treatment of infections caused by pathogens with intermediate resistance, a 3-h infusion of 2 g of meropenem every 8 h can provide concentrations in serum above the MIC of 16 microg/ml for almost 60% of an 8-h interval.

Acinetobacter↗

PubMed2000

Cost-effectiveness study of imipenem/cilastatin versus meropenem in intra-abdominal infections.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of two carbapenems, imipenem/cilastatin (I/C, 1.5 g daily) versus meropenem (3 g daily) in intra-abdominal infections was assessed in a recent multicenter randomized clinical trial. The aim of this article is to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis as in real-world practice according to the findings of this clinical trial. METHODS: A decision tree was used to estimate the clinical outcomes and direct costs of treating intra-abdominal infections using the two carbapenems from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (INHS) or a private insurance company (PIC). RESULTS: In a population of 30,000 patients with intra-abdominal infections in Italy, it was estimated that 97 potential deaths/year could be avoided if these patients were treated with I/C versus meropenem. In addition, from the perspective of INHS, the total costs of treatment were estimated as ITL 106,874 million and 134,042 million for I/C and meropenem, respectively. In favor of the PIC point of view, the total costs were estimated as ITL 110,500 million and 135,899 million for I/C and meropenem, respectively. CONCLUSION: The treatment of intra-abdominal infections with I/C is shown to be more effective (97 deaths avoided/year) and less costly than with meropenem (with a saving of ITL 27,168 and 25,399 million/year for INHS and PIC, respectively).

APACHE↗

PubMed2006

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of meropenem in pediatric patients.

Meropenem is a highly potent carbapenem antibiotic against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Meropenem plasma concentration data from 99 pediatric patients (aged 0.08-17.3 years) were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic model. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM with exponential interindividual variability and combinational residual error model. A 2-compartment model was found to fit the data best. Creatinine clearance and body weight were the most significant covariates explaining variabilities in meropenem pharmacokinetics among pediatric patients. The validated final model was used to predict meropenem plasma concentrations in 37 pediatric meningitis patients, receiving 40 mg/kg meropenem, who had minimum inhibitory concentration values of the causative pathogens and outcome available. Since the causative pathogens in all patients were eradicated, no break points for required exposure could be found. The microbiological outcomes indicate that the current clinical dosage regimen provides sufficient drug exposure to eradicate the pathogens commonly involved in pediatric meningitis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Population pharmacokinetic analysis and dosing regimen optimization of meropenem in adult patients.

The objectives of this study were to develop a meropenem population pharmacokinetic model using patient data and use it to explore alternative dosage regimens that could optimize the currently used dosing regimen to achieve higher likelihood of pharmacodynamic exposure against pathogenic bacteria. We gathered concentration data from 79 patients (ages 18-93 years) who received meropenem 0.5, 1, or 2 g over 0.5- or 3-hour infusion every 8 hours. Meropenem population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM program. A 2-compartment model fit the data best. Creatinine clearance, age, and body weight were the most significant covariates to affect meropenem pharmacokinetics. Monte Carlo simulation was applied to mimic the concentration-time profiles while 1 g meropenem was administrated via infusion over 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours. The 3-hour prolonged infusion improved the likelihood of obtaining both bacteriostatic and bactericidal exposures most notably at the current susceptibility breakpoints.

Abdominal Abscess↗

PubMed1995

Comparative in vitro killing activity of meropenem versus imipenem against multiresistant nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

In order to compare the in vitro killing activity of meropenem and imipenem against multiresistant P.aeruginosa 14 strains were used. All nosocomial isolates were susceptible to meropenem and imipenem minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC < or = 4 micrograms/ml) and resistant to at least two other antimicrobial agents of diverse chemical class with antipseudomonal activity. Forty-two killing curves were performed by exposing a 5 x 10(5) CFU/ml log-phase inoculum to 1x minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of each carbapenem. Meropenem was found to possess a slower killing rate than imipenem over the first 5 hours of P.aeruginosa exposure, but to be equally effective as imipenem after 24 hours of incubation. Forty percent and 11.1% of P.aeruginosa strains developed resistance to imipenem and meropenem respectively after a 24-hour exposure to carbapenem. The authors speculate about the underlying mechanisms explaining the higher rate of resistance development to imipenem than to meropenem.

Cross Infection↗