Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: will it help doctors pinpoint early prostate cancer?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Diagnosis, Differential↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Potential markers of aggressiveness in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
OBJECTIVE: High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) represents the most likely precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma. In this review, we discuss the utility of different techniques of interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in evaluating the genetic association between PIN and adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND RESULTS: Although the proportion of PIN and prostatic carcinoma foci that have chromosomal anomalies is similar, foci of carcinoma often have more alterations. This supports the hypothesis that PIN is a precursor of carcinoma. In some prostates, however, PIN foci have more alterations than matched carcinoma foci, suggesting that PIN foci can sometimes undergo more extensive chromosome evolution than carcinoma foci. Gain of chromosome 8 is the most common numerical alteration in prostatic carcinoma and PIN foci, and is associated with increasing cancer stage and grade. Thus, genes on chromosome 8 may play a role in the initiation and progression of prostatic carcinoma. One primary tumor focus usually shares chromosomal anomalies with associated lymph node metastases, implying that only one primary lesion acquires genetic alterations that allow it to escape the prostate. CONCLUSIONS: PIN and prostatic carcinoma have similar genetic changes. This supports the hypothesis that PIN is often a precursor of carcinoma. Genes on chromosome 8 may play a role in both initiation and progression of prostatic carcinoma.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is a risk factor for cancer.
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is now accepted as the most likely preinvasive stage of adenocarcinoma, a decade after its first formal description. PIN has a high predictive value as a marker for adenocarcinoma, and its identification warrants repeat biopsy for concurrent or subsequent invasive carcinoma. The only method of detection is biopsy; PIN does not significantly elevate serum PSA concentration or its derivatives and cannot be detected by ultrasonography. Most studies suggest that most patients with PIN will develop carcinoma within 10 years. PIN is associated with progressive abnormalities of phenotype and genotype, which are similar to cancer rather than normal prostatic epithelium, indicating impairment of cell differentiation with advancing stages of prostatic carcinogenesis. Androgen deprivation therapy decreases the prevalence and extent of PIN, suggesting that this form of treatment may play a role in chemoprevention.
Follow-Up Studies↗
Flutamide in men with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomized, placebo-controlled chemoprevention trial.
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) has been identified as a premalignant change in the prostate that indicates increased risk of the subsequent development of prostate adenocarcinoma. Prior studies have suggested that androgen deprivation therapy causes a regression of HGPIN. We therefore conducted a chemoprevention trial assessing the efficacy of flutamide in reducing the rate of prostate adenocarcinoma development in men with HGPIN. Men with biopsyproven HGPIN but no evidence of prostate adenocarcinoma were randomized in a double-blind manner to either flutamide 250 mg/d or a placebo. Treatment was continued for 1 year. Repeat biopsies were obtained at 12 and 24 months. Quality of life and toxicities related to treatment were also measured. Sixty patients were randomized and began therapy with either flutamide or placebo. At 1 year, 14% of men receiving flutamide and 10% of men receiving placebo had developed prostate adenocarcinoma. Flutamide-associated toxicities were mild to moderate in severity. Quality-of-life measures did not show any differences between the 2 groups. This study showed no evidence of benefit from flutamide as a chemoprevention agent in men with HGPIN.
Aged↗
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in mice expressing an androgen receptor transgene in prostate epithelium.
Prostate cancer (PCa) is an androgen dependent disease that can be treated by androgen ablation therapy, and clinical trials are under way to prevent PCa through the reduction of androgen receptor (AR) activity. However, there are no animal models of AR-mediated prostatic neoplasia, and it remains unclear whether the AR is a positive or negative regulator of cell growth in normal prostate secretory epithelium. To assess the direct effects of the AR in prostate epithelium, a murine AR transgene regulated by the rat probasin promoter (Pb) was used to generate transgenic mice expressing increased levels of AR protein in prostate secretory epithelium. The prostates in younger (<1 year) Pb-mAR transgenic mice were histologically normal, but Ki-67 immunostaining revealed marked increases in epithelial proliferation in ventral prostate and dorsolateral prostate. Older (>1 year) transgenic mice developed focal areas of intraepithelial neoplasia strongly resembling human high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), a precursor to PCa. These results demonstrate that the AR is a positive regulator of cell growth in normal prostate epithelium and provide a model system of AR-stimulated PIN that can be used for assessing preventative hormonal therapies and for identifying secondary transforming events relevant to human PCa.
Animals↗
Significance of apoptosis in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma.
This study was carried out to assess the significance of apoptosis in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and prostate cancer. A total of 120 prostatic specimens were studied in the department of Pathology [corrected] JNMC, Aligarh. The rate of apoptosis in PIN and prostate cancer was examined by quantifying the number of apoptotic bodies per hundred cells (apoptotic index) on haematoxylin and eosin stained histological sections [corrected] A significant correlation was noted between increasing apoptotic indices and increasing Gleason grades within a cancer.
Aged↗
The utility of Ki-67 expression in the differential diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and ductal adenocarcinoma.
Cribriform and/or papillary prostatic lesions observed on limited tissue, such as needle biopsy, can pose diagnostic dilemmas. One such area of difficulty is the distinction between papillary and/or cribriform prostatic high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PIN) and ductal adenocarcinoma. Over 48 months, we identified 17 cases of ductal adenocarcinoma and 17 cases of HG-PIN from radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. The HG-PIN lesions were in all cases associated with an acinar prostatic adenocarcinoma component. For each case, we evaluated the proliferative activity, assessed by Ki-67 immunohistochemistry. The majority (82%) of ductal adenocarcinomas were composed of mixed papillary and cribriform patterns, with the remaining demonstrating pure papillary or cribriform patterns. The HG-PIN lesions showed a papillary, cribriform, or mixed papillary/cribriform architecture. The proliferative activity, defined as Ki-67 labeling index, was statistically higher in ductal adenocarcinoma (mean 33%, range 21%-66%) as compared with HG-PIN (mean 6%, range 2%-15%), with no overlap in the Ki-67 indices (P = 0001). A combination of histological features and measurements of cellular proliferation may be helpful to distinguish HG-PIN from ductal adenocarcinoma in limited prostatic tissue samples.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Prevalence and distribution of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in salvage radical prostatectomy specimens after radiation therapy.
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of prostate cancer. The effect of radiation therapy (RT) on the prevalence of PIN is uncertain. We studied 86 patients who underwent salvage radical prostatectomy after irradiation failure at the Mayo Clinic. The prevalence, volume, multicentricity, spatial proximity to cancer, and architectural patterns of PIN were evaluated. High-grade PIN was identified in 53 (62%) of 86 prostatectomy specimens. Multiple architectural patterns were usually observed, including tufting in 87%, micropapillary in 66%, cribriform in 38%, and flat in 17%. The mean volume of PIN was 0.12 cm3 (range, 0.05-1.20 cm3). PIN was usually multicentric (70%), with a mean number of PIN foci of 2.5 (range, 1-10). Ninety-four percent of PIN foci were located within 2 mm of invasive cancer. There was no correlation between PIN and pathologic stage, surgical margin, tumor size, DNA ploidy, post-RT Gleason score, time interval from RT to biopsy-proven recurrence, postoperative prostate-specific antigen level, distant metastasis-free survival, or cancer-specific survival. Our examination of salvage radical prostatectomy specimens indicated that the prevalence and extent of PIN appeared to be reduced after RT compared to published studies of prostatectomies without prior RT.
Aged↗
Pathologic effects of neoadjuvant cyproterone acetate on nonneoplastic prostate, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma: a detailed analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens from a randomized trial.
Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT; androgen ablation) is used prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) in an attempt to pathologically "downstage" prostatic adenocarcinoma and ultimately to improve disease-free survival. This study describes the pathologic effects of NHT with the antiandrogen cyproterone acetate, 300 mg/day for 12 weeks, on the RP specimens from men with clinically localized (stage T1 or T2) prostatic adenocarcinoma. There were 101 men in the pretreatment group (CPA) and 91 men in a control group who were treated with surgery alone. The prevalence and extent of morphologic effects were recorded for the nonneoplastic prostate, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive adenocarcinoma. The commonest effects on the nonneoplastic prostate were atrophy and basal cell hyperplasia and prominence. High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia was more commonly identified in the surgery alone group than the CPA group (p <0.01). In the CPA group, flat and low tufted patterns of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia predominated. Following NHT, the adenocarcinoma showed characteristic morphologic alterations, including reduction in cytoplasmic quantity, cytoplasmic vacuolation, nuclear pyknosis, reduced gland diameter, and mucinous breakdown. In many cases there was prominence of collagenous stroma, obscuring malignant glands. Compared with the surgery alone group, the CPA group RP specimens had a significantly lower mean specimen weight (40.3 g vs 46.5 g, p = 0.025) and less tumor extent by several measures. Organ-confined tumor (stage pT2, margin negative) was found in 41.6% of the CPA group compared with 19.8% of the surgery alone group (p = 0.0017). The overall rate of margin positivity was lower in the CPA group (27.7% vs 64.8%, p = 0.001). We consider that the difference in margin positivity is the result of tumor shrinkage with a decreased likelihood of sampling in routine sections. There was no significant difference in the rate of extraprostatic extension between the two groups. There was elevation of the Gleason score in the RP specimens versus baseline biopsy in 60% of the CPA group compared with 33% of the surgery alone group (p = 0.02). The higher rate of elevation in the CPA group largely resulted from an increase in primary or secondary Gleason score 5 tumor, a morphologic artifact introduced by NHT. Because of this, we recommend not giving a Gleason grade to RP specimens following NHT. Monotherapy with CPA has similar pathologic effects on benign and malignant prostate tissue as does dual agent androgen blockade. Prolonged follow-up of these patients is required to determine if NHT with CPA leads to improved disease-free survival.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Elevated expression of estramustine binding protein (EMBP) in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) compared with malignant and benign prostatic epithelia.
The expression of estramustine-binding protein (EMBP) was studied immunohistochemically in whole-mount prostate sections. Specimens were taken from the prostates of 15 patients who had undergone total prostatectomy due to localized (TOd-T2 NO MO) prostatic cancer (PC). Almost all the examined whole-mount sections displayed areas with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). PIN is regarded as the main precursor of invasive PC. High- and low-grade PIN expressed EMBP. The average positively stained areas accounted for averages of 69.2% and 48.7%, respectively. High-grade PIN contained the highest EMBP levels of all the investigated (benign and malignant) epithelia, followed by moderately differentiated PC. With regard to areas with PC, the highest levels of EMBP expression (61.3%) were observed in moderately differentiated PC; poorly differentiated PC came second. Of all the examined epithelia, EMBP levels were lowest in well-differentiated PC (25.8%). Normal prostatic epithelia and hyperplasia were characterized by low EMBP expression, although somewhat higher than well-differentiated PC. A moderate expression (45%) was observed in the seminal vesicles. According to these results, EMBP was expressed mainly in the diseased peripheral zone (PZ), where PIN and prostatic cancer have their highest prevalence.
Aged↗
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Performance of Bayesian belief network for diagnosis and grading.
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) diagnosis and grading are affected by uncertainties which arise from the fact that almost all knowledge of PIN histopathology is expressed in concepts, descriptive linguistic terms, and words. A Bayesian belief network (BBN) was therefore used to reduce the problem of uncertainty in diagnostic clue assessment, while still considering the dependences between elements in the reasoning sequence. A shallow network was used with an open-tree topology, with eight first-level descendant nodes for the diagnostic clues (evidence nodes), each independently linked by a conditional probability matrix to a root node containing the diagnostic alternatives (decision node). One of the evidence nodes was based on the tissue architecture and the others were based on cell features. The system was designed to be interactive, in that the histopathologist entered evidence into the network in the form of likelihood ratios for outcomes at each evidence node. The efficiency of the network was tested on a series of 110 prostate specimens, subdivided as follows: 22 cases of non-neoplastic prostate or benign prostatic tissue (NP), 22 PINs of low grade (PINlow), 22 PINs of high grade (PINhigh), 22 prostatic adenocarcinomas with cribriform pattern (PACcri), and 22 prostatic adenocarcinomas with large acinar pattern (PAClgac). The results obtained in the benign and malignant categories showed that the belief for the diagnostic alternatives is very high, the values being in general more than 0.8 and often close to 1.0. When considering the PIN lesions, the network classified and graded most of the cases with high certainty. However, there were some cases which showed values less than 0.8 (13 cases out of 44), thus indicating that there are situations in which the feature changes are intermediate between contiguous categories or grades. Discrepancy between morphological grading and the BBN results was observed in four out of 44 PIN cases: one PINlow was classified as PINhigh and three PINhigh were classified as PINlow. In conclusion, the network can grade PIN lesions and differentiate them from other prostate lesions with certainty. In particular, it offers a descriptive classifier which is readily implemented and which allows the use of linguistic, fuzzy variables.
Adenocarcinoma↗
Current practice of diagnosis and reporting of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and glandular atypia among genitourinary pathologists.
The criteria for diagnosing prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and lesions suspicious for cancer are described in the literature. However, it is unknown how these are applied in practice by experts in genitourinary (GU) pathology. A questionnaire was sent to 93 GU pathologists in countries around the world with the purpose of surveying current practices. The response rate was 69% including 40 North American pathologists and 24 from other continents. For preneoplastic lesions, the term PIN was universally endorsed by the respondents. PIN was graded by 83%, usually as low/high-grade PIN (LGPIN/HGPIN) or as HGPIN only. Most respondents would usually not report lesions that may qualify for LGPIN. A majority (81%) did not specify architectural patterns of PIN. With both HGPIN and invasive cancer present, 69% would still mention HGPIN. Among the diagnostic criteria for HGPIN were any nucleoli visible (52%), or nucleoli seen in at least 10% of cells (33%). However, 56% would diagnose HGPIN in the absence of prominent nucleoli, most commonly based on prominent pleomorphism, marked hyperchromasia or mitotic figures. The number of cores involved with HGPIN was specified by 50%. Lesions suspicious for but not diagnostic of carcinoma were reported by 45% as atypia, atypical glands or suspicious for cancer and by 42% as atypical small acinar proliferation. The degree of suspicion was further defined by 41%. Our survey data may serve as a guideline to general pathologists on how to diagnose and report atypia and PIN in prostate biopsies.
Adult↗
Knowledge-guided histometry of the basal cell layer in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
OBJECTIVE: To define a procedure for the fully automated evaluation of histopathologic sections of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: The design is based on expert system-guided scene segmentation, the construction of a knowledge file and the defining of histometric measures for assessment of the basal cell layer. RESULTS: A knowledge file specifying a total of 263 entities was constructed. Of 73 multimegapixel-sized images of cribriform glands, 71 were correctly and completely processed. A histometric measure allowing precise indexing of the degree of lesion progression, based on the deterioration of the basal cell layer, was derived. CONCLUSION: The combination of image analytic and immunohistochemical procedures and fully automated processing provides a quantitative measure for evaluating prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia lesion progression and the effects of intervention.
Expert Systems↗
Conditional expression of human 15-lipoxygenase-1 in mouse prostate induces prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: the FLiMP mouse model.
The incidence and mortality of prostate cancer (PCa) vary greatly in different geographic regions, for which lifestyle factors, such as dietary fat intake, have been implicated. Human 15-lipoxygenase-1 (h15-LO-1), which metabolizes polyunsaturated fatty acids, is a highly regulated, tissue-specific, lipid-peroxidating enzyme that functions in physiological membrane remodeling and in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, inflammation, and carcinogenesis. We have shown that aberrant overexpression of 15-LO-1 occurs in human PCa, particularly high-grade PCa, and in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN), and that the murine orthologue is increased in SV40-based genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models of PCa, such as LADY and TRansgenic Adenocarcinoma of Mouse Prostate. To further define the role of 15-LO-1 in prostate carcinogenesis, we established a novel GEM model with targeted overexpression of h15-LO-1 in the prostate [human fifteen lipoxygenase-1 in mouse prostate (FLiMP)]. We used a Cre- mediated and a loxP-mediated recombination strategy to target h15-LO-1 specifically to the prostate of C57BL/6 mice. Wild-type (wt), FLiMP+/-, and FLiMP+/+ mice aged 7 to 21, 24 to 28, and 35 weeks were characterized by histopathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and DNA/RNA and enzyme analyses. Compared to wt mice, h15-LO-1 enzyme activity was increased similarly in both homozygous FLiMP+/+ and hemizygous FLiMP+/- prostates. Dorsolateral and ventral prostates of FLiMP mice showed focal and progressive epithelial hyperplasia with nuclear atypia, indicative of the definition of mouse prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (mPIN) according to the National Cancer Institute. These foci showed increased proliferation by Ki-67 IHC. No progression to invasive PCa was noted up to 35 weeks. By IHC, h15-LO-1 expression was limited to luminal epithelial cells, with increased expression in mPIN foci (similar to human HGPIN). In summary, targeted overexpression of h15-LO-1 (a gene overexpressed in human PCa and HGPIN) to mouse prostate is sufficient to promote epithelial proliferation and mPIN development. These results support 15-LO-1 as having a role in prostate tumor initiation and as an early target for dietary or other prevention strategies. The FLiMP mouse model should also be useful in crosses with other GEM models to further define the combinations of molecular alterations necessary for PCa progression.
Animals↗
Serum insulin-like growth factor-I levels and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a clue to the relationship between IGF-I physiology and prostate cancer risk.
Serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels at the higher end of the reference range have been associated with increased risk for the future development of prostate cancer. We determined whether high serum IGF-I levels are associated with precancerous lesions of the prostate. We conducted a case-control study to determine whether high serum IGF-I levels were associated with the presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) among patients who presented for prostate biopsy because of an abnormal serum prostate-specific antigen level or digital rectal exam. We measured serum IGF-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) prior to prostate biopsy and compared them between 103 men with HGPIN (cases) and 205 men with normal prostate histology (controls). The mean IGF-I level in patients with HGPIN (130.2 ng/mL) was significantly higher compared with controls (118.8 ng/mL, P = 0.01). The mean IGFBP-3 level in patients with HGPIN (2,393.9 ng/mL) was also higher compared with controls (2,276.0 ng/mL, P = 0.06). After adjusting for age, prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal examination, and ethnic background, the odds ratio for a HGPIN diagnosis among men in the highest relative to the lowest quartile of serum IGF-I level was 1.94 (95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.7; P = 0.04). The potential association between a high serum IGF-I level and the presence of HGPIN may represent an important clue to understanding the basis for the relationship between IGF-I physiology and prostate cancer risk. Larger studies will be required to confirm this relationship.
Aged↗
An investigation into the spatial relationship between prostate intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer.
The distribution of high grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and cancer was analysed in 18 separate areas from 89 radical prostatectomy specimens that had been sectioned and digitally imaged. When the occurrence of each type of pathology was summated a predilection was demonstrated for both pathologies in the apex of the prostate and a linear relationship was found between the frequency of cancer and high grade PIN (r(2)=0.744, P<0.05). This relationship was strongest at the apex (r(2)=0.621, P<0.005), lower in the midgland (r(2)=0.828, P<0.05) and bordered on significance at the base (r(2)=0.621, P<0.063). These results support the theory that cancer could obliterate high grade PIN as it over grows the areas once occupied by PIN.Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2001) 4, 97-100
Journal Article↗
Immunoreactive p53 protein in high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
p53 protein accumulation in the nuclei of prostatic carcinoma cells, as detected by immunohistochemistry, has been associated with increased cell proliferation rate, increased histologic grade and stage, androgen independence and decreased patient survival. Little is known, however, of p53 in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), the putative precursor proliferation for moderately to poorly differentiated peripheral zone carcinoma of the prostate. In this investigation, we utilized a panel of antibodies reactive with p53 protein to assess p53 protein accumulation in prostatic epithelial hyperplasia, PIN and prostatic carcinoma. Forty patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy were selected for study based on the presence of high grade PIN and carcinoma in the same prostate tissue block. Tissue sections were treated with microwave irradiation for antigen retrieval, and antibodies DO-7, PAb1801 and CM-1 were used for immunohistochemical analysis. An intense signal for immunoreactive p53 was identified in the nuclei of 7/40 (17.5%) clinically-localized prostatic carcinomas. In all 7 cases, high grade PIN also exhibited intense p53 immunoreactivity, whereas only one case of hyperplasia contained immunoreactive p53 protein. These findings support a close relationship between high grade PIN and carcinoma in a subset of primary prostatic carcinomas with high-level p53 protein accumulation.
Carcinoma↗
Epidemiology of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
This review summarizes published data dealing with the prevalence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in a variety of prostate tissue samples. Additionally, we have attempted to document the relationship between HGPIN and the pathological parameters of prostate cancer in autopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Studies reporting the prevalence of HGPIN in needle biopsies, transurethral resection specimens and radical prostatectomy specimens, and those documenting the lesion in postmortem settings are compared. We also summarize studies in which the distribution and/or extent of HGPIN was correlated with prostate cancer stage, grade and volume. There is significant variation in the reported frequency of HGPIN, particularly in needle biopsy specimens, with a range of 0.8-23.9%. The factors responsible for these discrepancies include the population studied, the limited sample size that needle biopsies represent, diagnostic inconsistencies and, possibly, tissue preparation/staining variables. Because of the important implications a diagnosis of HGPIN carries, there is a pressing need to achieve greater consistency in diagnosing and reporting the lesion. Better targeted educational efforts, including teaching courses, websites with illustrations and the possibility of teleconsultations, are among possible means to attain this goal. Better documentation of the evolution of HGPIN to cancer through clinical follow-up is also recommended.
Biopsy, Needle↗