PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

[Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of sore throat].

BACKGROUND: Available guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of sore throat give conflicting recommendations. Our aim was to develop evidence-based guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched The Cochrane Library, Medline and other sources for systematic reviews and other evidence that met explicit inclusion criteria for all of the relevant options and outcomes we identified. The validity of included studies was assessed. Draft recommendations based on assessment of this evidence were widely circulated and discussed in focus groups with patients and physician assistants. RESULTS: Throat infections are self-limiting and complications rare. Penicillin shortens the duration of symptoms in tonsillitis caused by beta-haemolytic streptococci and reduces the risk of complications. Penicillin has adverse effects and increases the risk of reinfections. Patients with sore throat should usually be treated without antibiotics. Visiting a physician is normally unnecessary. Antibiotics should be considered in serious cases or if the patient prefers this, but should only be prescribed for throat infections caused by beta-haemolytic streptococci. The diagnosis should be based on clinical criteria and a rapid antigen test in cases of doubt. INTERPRETATION: Benefits of antibiotics must be weighed against harms. Patients should be given good information and involved in decision-making if they want antibiotics.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in hematological diseases.

In the last decade large amounts of intravenous immunoglobulin (i.v.Ig) have been used worldwide. Doubts exist as to whether this increased use is paralleled by a comparable growth of reliable data on the therapeutic effectiveness of i.v.Ig. We performed a literature search using MEDLINE from January 1981 to January 1997 and analysed articles on the use of i.v.Ig in hematological disorders and searched for published guidelines. For most hematological disorders, evidence to use i.v.Ig as first line therapy is not very strong. For many disorders no controlled trials have been performed. In published guidelines, i.v.Ig is only recommended, with a few exceptions, when other treatments have failed or are contraindicated. Therefore the increase of consumption of i.v.Ig can not be explained by an increase in established indications in hematology.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents in the prevention of colorectal cancer.

Chemoprevention refers to the use of specific natural or synthetic chemical agents to reverse, suppress, or prevent the progression to invasive cancer. The ideal chemopreventive agent is safe and nontoxic over the long term. It should be easy to take and demonstrated to be effective in randomized trials in humans. Aspirin and NSAIDs meet many of the criteria for an ideal agent. The literature on aspirin and NSAIDs makes it clear that these agents can prevent colorectal cancer and precursor adenomas. That does not mean that we should make general recommendations for their use. First, we do not know the proper dose or duration. More important, these medications are accompanied by adverse effects that can be considerable. Indeed, the Medical Letter, an authoritative, unbiased publication on drugs and therapeutics, concluded that "for primary prevention in low-risk patients, more studies are required to establish whether the beneficial effect of aspirin is great enough to compensate for the possible increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke." These recommendations were directed at the use of these medications for prevention of myocardial infarction, but the same conclusions apply to colorectal cancer: although aspirin may prevent the disease, it may increase the risk of hemorrhagic strokes or cause other adverse effects. We must accurately balance the benefits and risks of these drugs, based on the results of ongoing randomized studies, before recommending aspirin for prevention of colorectal cancer. Is there anything that we can recommend to our patients for prevention of colorectal cancer? Based on observational epidemiologic studies, it is clear that individuals who consume a diet high in vegetables and natural fibers and low in fat have a reduced risk of colon cancer and polyps. Optimal nutrient intakes for the prevention of cancer might be more readily achieved via food fortification or supplementation, but this requires more research. Regular physical exercise and maintenance of normal body weight are also protective. Until the results of definitive studies of chemopreventive agents are available, we can recommend that our patients eat a sensible diet, exercise, and avoid obesity. Such an approach should protect them from cardiovascular disease, an even deadlier condition than colorectal cancer. In the future, we need randomized prevention trials that, for logistic reasons, may need to focus on the occurrence and progression of colorectal adenomas rather than carcinoma itself. Studies that test more than one compound at a time, using factorial designs, will be more efficient. We will need better information about duration and dose, adverse side effects, molecular mechanisms, and cellular sites of NSAID activity. Ultimately, we will need to know more about the biology and molecular biology of colorectal cancer and its precursors. That information will, perhaps, permit us to design agents to interrupt the pathway to cancer and to use intermediate markers more intelligently.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Clinical experiences with the use of indole-3-pyruvic acid.

In the last few years, Indol-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) has been subjected to 5 pilot clinical trials in volunteers and a phase II study on patients affected by anxiety, with or without sleep problems. Overall, results indicated a very good safety profile, relief from anxiety and a better quality of sleep in patients treated with IPA. Moreover, the drug showed no withdrawal signs, but positive effects on mood, improving feelings of relaxation, calmness and happiness. The mechanism of action of IPA, depending on increased turnover of some indoles in the CNS, appears clearly distinct from that of benzodiazepines, suggesting that the drug might be used in the treatment of symptoms of mild anxiety and stress experienced by busy and anxious people.

Anti-Anxiety Agents↗

Data-proof practice.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

Therapy of left ventricular dysfunction: implications of recent therapeutic trials and future directions for therapy.

The natural history of patients with heart failure has changed relatively little until recently. Several large randomized trials have however recently changed our approach to the patient with symptomatic as well as asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. Although the effect of digoxin on survival is still uncertain there is still good evidence from the Radiance study in which patients were randomly withdrawn from digoxin that patients who remain on digoxin have a significant improvement in exercise tolerance and well being. The Consensus trial in patients with class IV heart failure suggested that ACE inhibitors were effective in improving survival. This therapy has not however been widely adapted in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. The recent randomized SOLVD treatment trial in conjunction with the VHEFT II study clearly shows that ACE inhibitors should be the basis for therapy along with a diuretic and digoxin if necessary in all patients with symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction unless contraindicated or not tolerated. There is also evidence from the SOLVD prevention trial that ACE inhibitors can prevent the development of manifest heart failure and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction. The importance of ACE inhibitors in patients with asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction is confirmed by data from the SAVE trial which examine both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with left ventricular dysfunction 3-16 days post infarction. Of interest in both the SOLVD treatment and prevention trials as well as the SAVE trial was the finding that ACE inhibitors reduced the incidence of recurrent ischemic events.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

Pharmacologic agents for the treatment of acute bipolar mania.

The knowledge base regarding the medical treatment of acute bipolar mania is rapidly expanding. Information about agents with established antimanic properties is increasing, and more agents with putative antimanic properties are being identified. We first review the controlled studies supporting the efficacy of the established antimanic agents lithium, valproate, and carbamazepine and standard antipsychotics. We then review available research on two important classes of drugs that are emerging as potential treatments for acute mania: the novel antipsychotics, which include clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone, and the new antiepileptics, which include gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine, topiramate, and zonisamide. We conclude that although controlled data are accumulating to support the efficacy of several atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of acute bipolar mania, particularly olanzapine, ziprasidone, and risperidone, the novel antiepileptics need more extensive study before it can be concluded that any of them possess specific antimanic properties. We also conclude that as the medical options for acute bipolar mania expand, treatment guidelines must remain both evidence based and flexible, so that they represent cutting edge medical science yet can be tailored to the specific needs of individual patients.

Acute Disease↗

Severity of left ventricular remodeling defines outcomes and response to therapy in heart failure: Valsartan heart failure trial (Val-HeFT) echocardiographic data.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that the severity of left ventricular remodeling predicts the response to treatment and outcomes in chronic heart failure. BACKGROUND: Reversal of remodeling should produce the most favorable outcome in patients with the most severe remodeling. METHODS: In 5010 heart failure patients on background therapy and randomized to valsartan and placebo, serial recordings of left ventricular internal diastolic diameter (LVIDd) and ejection fraction (EF) were read at sites that had to meet qualifying standards before participating. Baseline LVIDd and EF were pooled across treatments and retrospectively grouped by quartiles Q1 to Q4, representing best to worst. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were obtained by the log-rank test. Q1 was compared with Q4 for mortality and combined mortality and morbidity (M + M) from Cox regression risk ratios (RRs). Valsartan versus placebo changes from baseline in LVIDd and EF were analyzed by quartiles from analysis of covariance. Valsartan and placebo were compared by RRs for M + M. RESULTS: Survival rates were greater in the better quartiles for LVIDd and EF (p < 0.00001). The RR for Q1 versus Q4 in events approached 0.5 for both LVIDd and EF (p < 0.0001). An LVIDd decrease and EF increase were quartile-dependent and greater with valsartan than placebo at virtually all time points. The RR for M + M outcomes favored valsartan in the worse quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Stratification by baseline severity of remodeling showed that patients with worse LVIDd and EF are at highest risk for an event, yet appear to gain the most anti-remodeling effect and clinical benefit with valsartan treatment.

Antihypertensive Agents↗

[Diet therapy in chronic inflammatory bowel disease: results from meta-analysis and randomized controlled trials].

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are chronic inflammatory bowel diseases of unknown etiology. Unspecific immunosuppressive therapy represents current standard treatment and is often associated with severe side effects. Several treatment regimens have been evaluated to identify alternative therapeutic options. Among these different diet therapies were investigated. Objective of this paper is to review the results of diet therapy in chronic inflammatory bowel disease on the basis of randomised controlled trials and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. METHODS: Medline and Cochrane Library were searched for meta-analysis and randomised controlled trials investigating this question. Additionally reference lists of identified articles and text books were checked for further trials. RESULTS: Four meta-analyses investigated the treatment of acute Crohn's disease with elemental-, semi-elemental-, and polymeric diets in comparison to corticosteroids or to another form of enteral diet. All meta-analyses show a superiority of corticosteroids and no difference in the effect of the compared enteral diets. Randomised controlled trials investigating diet therapy in ulcerative colitis have not been summarised in a meta-analysis yet. Eleven randomised trials were identified which evaluated diets in ulcerative colitis patients: Dietary supplementation with n-3-fatty acids (6 trials), elemental diet [2], dietary supplementation with dietary fiber [1], elimination diet [1], and dietary supplementation with olestra [1]. Only for the elimination diet a significant positive effect on the course of disease was found in one trial which investigated only 18 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral nutritional therapy of acute Crohn's disease is less effective than treatment with corticosteroids. In case of severe steroid induced side effects diet treatment can present a promising alternative. Superiority of one of the investigated different formulations was not found. Meta-analyses of randomised trials provide a clear and easy to understand presentation of the effect of this intervention. Eleven published trials investigating the effect of diets in ulcerative colitis show only for elimination diet a positive treatment effect. The trials do find a positive effect of one of the other interventions but the trials are very small and cannot exclude a treatment effect. Meta-analysis of these trials would be helpful for a better presentation and understanding of these results.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Is antiviral treatment (IFN alpha and/or ribavirin) justified in cirrhosis related to hepatitis C virus? Société Royale Belge de Gastro-entérologie.

AIM: To assess the benefit risk ratio of interferon and ribavirin in the treatment of patients with post hepatitis C cirrhosis we summarize the spontaneous over mortality of this disease, and made an overview of the randomized trials and of other controlled studies. RESULTS: In comparison to controls, patients with post hepatitis C cirrhosis have a 17 fold increase risk of dying from a liver disease that a control population, and a 6 fold increase from primary liver cancer. In France the hepatitis C epidemic which start in the sixties explains now the observed dramatic increase in mortality by primary liver cancer, both in men and women. Meta-analysis of randomized trials and controlled retrospective studies showed that interferon treatment is associated with a significant increase in ALT response at the end of the treatment, with a decrease in hepatocellular incidence as well as a decrease in mortality in comparison with controls. Very few data are published concerning ribavirin alone or in combination with interferon in patients with cirrhosis. Preliminary data suggest that this combination during 48 weeks permit to obtain in patients with compensated cirrhosis 20% of sustained virological response. The safety was acceptable but patients with low initial blood cells count must be carefully followed. In conclusion this overview clearly demonstrates a benefit-risk ratio in favor of treatment in patients with post hepatitis C cirrhosis by interferon.

Antiviral Agents↗

Recombinant activated factor VII for bleeding in patients without inherited bleeding disorders.

(1) Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is licensed in Canada for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in hemophiliacs, but it is increasingly used to control bleeding in non-hemophilic patients during surgery, or during treatment for severe trauma or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). (2) In one clinical trial, there was a significant reduction in mortality among patients with ICH treated with rFVIIa. In another trial, administration of rFVIIa significantly reduced the number of trauma patients needing massive blood transfusions although there was no significant difference in mortality. (3) Adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to clarify the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa for non-bleeding disorder indications. Phase III trials in ICH and trauma are underway. (4) There is potential for non-hemophilic use, particularly if clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness are established.

Canada↗

Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.

The objective was to review the current status of meta-analysis, the process of combining the results of similar investigations, which was described in 1976. It has evolved rapidly, and thousands have already been published. Meta-analysis may be performed in a narrative form or in the preferred statistical format, which is more rigorous and demanding. The criteria for designing and performing a meta-analysis of high quality are presented and discussed in detail, including selection criteria, quality, biases and heterogeneity, both of component studies and of results. Critical reviews of meta-analyses are presented. Examples are given from my own field--hepatology--and from my own research experience. Although meta-analysis is simple in concept, it is complex in execution. If performed with insufficient insight or attention to detail, it may give ambiguous or erroneous results.

Bias↗