PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Signal Recognition Particle”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 217 records · Page 12Linked to original sources

The E. coli signal recognition particle is required for the insertion of a subset of inner membrane proteins.

E. coli homologs of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor are essential for viability, but their role in protein export is unclear. To elucidate their function, we devised a genome-wide screen to identify genes that encode SRP substrates. Inhibition of the SRP pathway sharply blocked the membrane insertion of several polytopic inner membrane proteins (IMPs) that were predicted to be SRP substrates, but had a smaller effect on the insertion of other IMPs and no significant effect on preprotein translocation. Our results suggest that whereas most E. coli preproteins and some IMPs can utilize SRP-independent targeting pathways effectively, the structural features of a subset of IMPs have required the conservation of an SRP-based targeting machinery.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Prediction of signal recognition particle RNA genes.

We describe a method for prediction of genes that encode the RNA component of the signal recognition particle (SRP). A heuristic search for the strongly conserved helix 8 motif of SRP RNA is combined with covariance models that are based on previously known SRP RNA sequences. By screening available genomic sequences we have identified a large number of novel SRP RNA genes and we can account for at least one gene in every genome that has been completely sequenced. Novel bacterial RNAs include that of Thermotoga maritima, which, unlike all other non-gram-positive eubacteria, is predicted to have an Alu domain. We have also found the RNAs of Lactococcus lactis and Staphylococcus to have an unusual UGAC tetraloop in helix 8 instead of the normal GNRA sequence. An investigation of yeast RNAs reveals conserved sequence elements of the Alu domain that aid in the analysis of these RNAs. Analysis of the human genome reveals only two likely genes, both on chromosome 14. Our method for SRP RNA gene prediction is the first convenient tool for this task and should be useful in genome annotation.

Alu Elements↗

Assembly of the human signal recognition particle (SRP): overlap of regions required for binding of protein SRP54 and assembly control.

Assembly of the human signal recognition particle (SRP) entails the incorporation of protein SRP54, mediated by a protein SRP1 9-induced conformational change in SRP RNA. To localize the region that controls this crucial step in the assembly of human SRP RNA, four chimeras, Ch-1 to Ch-4, composed of portions of human and Methanococcus jannashii SRP RNAs, were generated by PCR site-directed mutagenesis from a larger precursor. Protein-binding activities of the hybrid RNAs were determined using purified human SRP19 and a polypeptide (SRP54M) that corresponded to the methionine-rich domain of human SRP54. Mutant Ch-1 containing the large domain of M. jannashii SRP RNA, as well as mutant Ch-2 RNA in which helices 6 and 8 were replaced, bound SRP54M independently of SRP19. Mutant Ch-3 RNA, which contained M. jannashii helix 6, required SRP19 for binding of SRP54M, but mutant Ch-4 RNA, which possessed M. jannashii helix 8, bound SRP54M without SRP19. We concluded that the formation of a stable ternary complex did not rely on extensive conformational changes that might take place throughout the large domain of SRP, but was controlled by a smaller region encompassing certain RNA residues at positions 177 to 221. Five chimeric RNAs altered within helix 8 were used to investigate the potential role of a significant AA-to-U change and to determine the boundaries of the assembly control region. Reduced protein-binding activities of these chimeras demonstrated a considerable overlap of regions required for SRP54 binding and assembly control.

Base Sequence↗

Post-transcriptional adenylation of signal recognition particle RNA is carried out by an enzyme different from mRNA Poly(A) polymerase.

A fraction of the signal recognition particle (SRP) RNA from human, rat, Xenopus, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells contains a single post-transcriptionally added adenylic acid residue on its 3'-end; in the case of human SRP RNA, over 60% of the SRP RNA molecules contain a nontemplated adenylic acid residue on their 3'-ends (Sinha, K. M., Gu, J., Chen, Y., and Reddy, R. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 6853-6859). In this study, we investigated the enzyme that is involved in this 3'-end adenylation of SRP RNA. A U1A protein peptide conjugated to albumin completely inhibited the polyadenylation of a SV40 mRNA by HeLa cell nuclear extract in vitro; however, the 3'-end adenylation of human SRP RNA or Alu RNA, which corresponds to 5' and 3'-ends of SRP RNA, was not affected by this U1A peptide conjugate. SRP RNA from mutant strains of S. cerevisiae with a temperature-sensitive mRNA poly(A) polymerase grown at a restrictive temperature of 37 degrees C also contained a post-transcriptionally added adenylic acid residue just like SRP RNA from wild-type cells and mutant cells grown at permissive temperature of 23 degrees C. In addition, binding of SRP 9/14-kDa protein heterodimer was required for adenylation of Alu RNA in vitro. These lines of evidence, along with other data, show that post-transcriptional adenylation of SRP and Alu RNAs is carried out by a novel enzyme that is distinct from the mRNA poly(A) polymerase, CCA-adding enzyme, and nonspecific terminal transferase.

Alu Elements↗

Identification of an RNA-binding-loop in the N-terminal region of signal-recognition-particle protein SRP19.

Protein SRP19 is a 144-amino-acid polypeptide that associates intimately with the signal-recognition particle RNA (SRP RNA) and serves as an important structural and functional component of the SRP. We investigated the structure and RNA-binding activity of the human SRP19 protein by the use of comparative sequence analysis, high-stringency structure prediction, proteolytic susceptibility, and site-directed mutagenesis. SRP19 was found to consist of two distinct regions (called N-terminal and C-terminal regions) that are separated by a boundary of approximately 12-15 amino acid residues. Both regions contain an alpha-helix and several beta-strands that are connected by loops or turns. In agreement with the hypothetical model, proteolytic susceptibility demonstrated the predominant accessibility of two sites: one in a surface loop of the N-terminal region (YLNNKKTIAEGR33), and another site in the C-terminal tail at residues L129 and E133. The RNA-binding activities of mutant polypeptides with changes of conserved lysines and arginines (mutants K27Q, R33Q and R34Q) demonstrated that the proteolytically accessible loop of the N-terminal region is in direct contact with the SRP RNA. In contrast, alteration of a certain basic amino acid residues in the C-terminal region (R83, K116 and R118), as well as a deletion of four amino acid residues located at the boundary between the two regions, had no effect on the RNA-binding ability. The structural model that emerges from our data is thematically similar to that of ribosomal protein S5, the N-domain of which contains a loop motif believed to interact with double-stranded RNA. The presence of a similar structural feature in protein SRP19 has significant implications for the structure and function of the SRP19-RNA complex.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Signal sequence recognition and targeting of ribosomes to the endoplasmic reticulum by the signal recognition particle do not require GTP.

The identification of GTP-binding sites in the 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and in both the alpha and beta subunits of the SRP receptor has complicated the task of defining the step in the protein translocation reaction that is controlled by the GTP-binding site in the SRP. Ribonucleotide binding assays show that the purified SRP can bind GDP or GTP. However, crosslinking experiments show that SRP54 can recognize the signal sequence of a nascent polypeptide in the absence of GTP. Targeting of SRP-ribosome-nascent polypeptide complexes, formed in the absence of GTP, to microsomal membranes likewise proceeds normally. To separate the GTPase cycles of SRP54 and the alpha subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha), we employed an SR alpha mutant that displays a markedly reduced affinity for GTP. We observed that the dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the translocation site could only occur when GTP binding to SR alpha was permitted. These data suggest that the GTP binding and hydrolysis cycles of both SRP54 and SR alpha are initiated upon formation of the SRP-SRP receptor complex.

Animals↗

SEC65 gene product is a subunit of the yeast signal recognition particle required for its integrity.

Protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in mammalian cells is catalysed by the signal recognition particle (SRP), which consists of six protein subunits and an RNA subunit. Saccharomyces cerevisiae SRP is a 16S particle, of which only two subunits have been identified: a protein subunit, SRP54p, which is homologous to the mammalian SRP54 subunit, and an RNA subunit, scR1 (ref. 3). The sec65-1 mutant yeast cells are temperature-sensitive for growth and defective in the translocation of several secreted and membrane-bound proteins. The DNA sequence of the SEC65 gene suggests that its product is related to mammalian SRP19 subunit and may have a similar function. Here we show that SEC65p is a subunit of the S. cerevisiae SRP and that it is required for the stable association of another subunit, SRP54p, with SRP. Overexpression of SRP54p suppresses both growth and protein translocation defects in sec65-1 mutant cells.

Biological Transport, Active↗

A large presecretory protein translocates both cotranslationally, using signal recognition particle and ribosome, and post-translationally, without these ribonucleoparticles, when synthesized in the presence of mammalian microsomes.

Translocation of large presecretory proteins into the mammalian endoplasmic reticulum requires the ribonucleoparticles, signal recognition particle, and ribosome and is tightly coupled to ongoing protein synthesis. We have shown previously that small presecretory proteins can translocate post-translationally in a reaction that does not require these ribonucleoparticles. We now report that one large protein, a synthetic hybrid between preprocecropin A and dihydrofolate reductase, translocates both cotranslationally (with the aid of signal recognition particle and ribosome) and post-translationally (without the involvement of these ribonucleoparticles) during its in vitro synthesis in the presence of dog pancreas microsomes. The distinction between these two modes of translocation was made possible by adding methotrexate to the translocation reaction. Methotrexate can only form a tight complex with those preprocecropin A-dihydrofolate reductase hybrid chains that have completed their synthesis and folded, but in forming this tight complex, this drug prevents translocation of the dihydrofolate reductase domain across the membrane.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Site-directed mutagenesis of signal-recognition particle RNA. Identification of the nucleotides in helix 8 required for interaction with protein SRP19.

The RNA component of signal recognition particle (SRP) consists of eight helices which form a functional unit with the proteins of the SRP. The primary binding site of the 19-kDa protein of SRP (SRP19) is a tetranucleotide loop (tetraloop) in helix 6 of the SRP RNA, but additional determinants are located in helix 8, which might play important roles in the assembly and the function of the particle. To determine the structural features in helix 8 essential for interaction with SRP19, we altered helix 8 systematically by site-directed mutagenesis, and determined the ability of protein SRP19 to interact with the various mutant SRP RNAs. Binding of SRP19 was affected by base changes introduced into the 5' portion (192A, 193G, 194G in the human SRP RNA), but not into the 3' portion (205 A, 206G, 207C) of the distally located conserved internal loop of helix 8. Of the three bases at positions 192-194, only a pyrimidine at position 192 impaired the association with SPR19. An important feature of the SRP19-RNA interaction were the three base pairs U195-G204, C196-G203 and G197-C202 which shape the helix-8 tetraloop. Some base-specific features in the base pairs were also recognized. The tetraloop bases of helix 8 were dispensable for the interaction with SRP19.

Base Composition↗

The signal recognition particle and related small cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles.

Recently, a number of novel small cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particles have been identified that comprise RNA and protein subunits related to the signal recognition particle (SRP). Here we discuss the latest results on the structure and functions of SRP together with the structures and putative functions of the novel SRP-related ribonucleoprotein particles.

Animals↗

The 72-kDa component of signal recognition particle is cleaved during apoptosis.

Proteins cleaved by apoptotic caspases are commonly recognized by autoantibodies found in the serum of patients with rheumatic disease. We report that the 72-kDa signal recognition particle (SRP) protein, a rare target of autoantibodies found in the serum of patients with dermatomyositis and systemic lupus erythematosus, is rapidly cleaved in Jurkat T cells treated with apoptotic (i.e. Fas ligation, treatment with gamma or ultraviolet radiation, or co-culture with anisomycin or staurosporine) but not proliferative (CD3 cross-linking) stimuli. Cleavage of SRP 72 produces a 66-kDa amino-terminal fragment and a 6-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment that is selectively phosphorylated on serine residues. Cleavage of SRP 72 is prevented by chemical and peptide caspase inhibitors, and by overexpression of bcl-2, an inhibitor of apoptotic cell death. Analysis of the carboxyl terminus of SRP 72 has identified a putative cleavage site (SELD/A) for group III caspases, and carboxyl-terminal serine residues that are highly conserved in phylogeny. Both serine phosphorylation and caspase cleavage of SRP 72 are observed in cells derived from human, dog, rat, and mouse. Canine SRP 72 is cleaved in vitro by recombinant caspase 3 but retains the ability to mediate transport of a signal peptide-containing protein into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen. The 72-kDa component of the SRP joins a growing list of autoantigens that undergo post-translational modifications during programmed cell death.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The Alu domain homolog of the yeast signal recognition particle consists of an Srp14p homodimer and a yeast-specific RNA structure.

The mammalian Alu domain of the signal recognition particle (SRP) consists of a heterodimeric protein SRP9/14 and the Alu portion of 7SL RNA and comprises the elongation arrest function of the particle. To define the domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae SRP that is homologous to the mammalian Alu domain [Alu domain homolog in yeast (Adhy)], we examined the assembly of a yeast protein homologous to mammalian SRP14 (Srp14p) and scR1 RNA. Srp14p binds as a homodimeric complex to the 5' sequences of scR1 RNA. Its minimal binding site consists of 99 nt. (Adhy RNA), comprising a short hairpin structure followed by an extended stem. As in mammalian SRP9/14, the motif UGUAAU present in most SRP RNAs is part of the Srp14p binding sites as shown by footprint and mutagenesis studies. In addition, certain basic amino acid residues conserved between mammalian SRP14 and Srp14p are essential for RNA binding in both proteins. These findings confirm the common ancestry of the yeast and the mammalian components and indicate that Srp14p together with Adhy RNA represents the Alu domain homolog in yeast SRP that may comprise its elongation arrest function. Despite the similarities, Srp14p selectively recognizes only scR1 RNA, revealing substantial changes in RNA-protein recognition as well as in the overall structure of the complex. The alignment of the three yeast SRP RNAs known to date suggests a common structure for the putative elongation arrest domain of all three organisms.

Alu Elements↗

Dual recognition of the ribosome and the signal recognition particle by the SRP receptor during protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum.

We have analyzed the interactions between the signal recognition particle (SRP), the SRP receptor (SR), and the ribosome using GTPase assays, biosensor experiments, and ribosome binding assays. Possible mechanisms that could contribute to an enhanced affinity between the SR and the SRP-ribosome nascent chain complex to promote protein translocation under physiological ionic strength conditions have been explored. Ribosomes or 60S large ribosomal subunits activate the GTPase cycle of SRP54 and SRalpha by providing a platform for assembly of the SRP-SR complex. Biosensor experiments revealed high-affinity, saturable binding of ribosomes or large ribosomal subunits to the SR. Remarkably, the SR has a 100-fold higher affinity for the ribosome than for SRP. Proteoliposomes that contain the SR bind nontranslating ribosomes with an affinity comparable to that shown by the Sec61 complex. An NH2-terminal 319-residue segment of SRalpha is necessary and sufficient for binding of SR to the ribosome. We propose that the ribosome-SR interaction accelerates targeting of the ribosome nascent chain complex to the RER, while the SRP-SR interaction is crucial for maintaining the fidelity of the targeting reaction.

Animals↗

Small ribonucleoproteins in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica homologous to signal recognition particle.

We have partially purified ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica with properties resembling those of mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP). In both species of yeast we have identified a single major RNA species in the size range of SRP RNA (256 nucleotides in S. pombe and 270 nucleotides in Y. lipolytica) present in postribosomal salt extracts of the cytoplasm. The RNPs containing these RNAs sediment in sucrose gradients at 11 S and 10 S for S. pombe and Y. lipolytica, respectively. Analysis of genomic clones of these RNAs has revealed that (i) they are encoded by single copy genes; (ii) they share two short conserved sequences that match the A and B boxes defined for polymerase III promoters; (iii) they can be folded into secondary structures that closely match that defined by phylogenetic analysis of higher eukaryotic SRP RNAs; and (iv) they show primary sequence conservation in short regions predicted to be single stranded. Both of the yeast RNAs bind under stringent conditions to canine SRP proteins. Most importantly, RNase protection of the S. pombe RNA by the individual canine SRP proteins, p19 and p68/72, shows that the proteins recognize homologous elements of the mammalian and yeast RNA. Taken together these data suggest strongly that we have identified yeast SRP homologues.

Animals↗

Entamoeba histolytica contains a gene encoding a homologue to the 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle.

We have determined the nucleotide sequence and predicted amino acid sequence of the 54 kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP54) from the amitochondrial protist Entamoeba histolytica. The SRP54 gene was isolated from a genomic library using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) probe. Nucleotide sequence analysis of a 2.3 kb fragment, derived from a 7 kb genomic clone, revealed an open reading frame encoding a protein of 487 amino acids (MW 53.8 kDa). The identities of the predicted amino acid sequence with its homologues from other species were between 24 and 47%. Functional domains previously defined for the SRP54-type proteins were present in the entamoebal sequence, such as the amino-terminal GTP binding domain (G domain) and the carboxy-terminal methionine rich domain (M domain). SRP54 mRNA contains an extra G residue at the 5' end, suggesting that capping of poly-A(+) transcripts is present in E. histolytica. Evolutionary analysis of the SRP54 based on phylogenetic inference placed the E. histolytica sequence as an early divergence of the eukaryotic tree. Although the function of the entamoebal homologue remains to be elucidated, the identification of the SRP54 gene constitutes the first evidence for SRP related proteins in protozoans.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Localization of translocation complex components in Bacillus subtilis: enrichment of the signal recognition particle receptor at early sporulation septa.

We here demonstrate that in Bacillus subtilis, the signal recognition particle receptor, FtsY, transiently localizes to early sporulation septa, whereas three SecYEG translocase-associated membrane proteins (SecDF, SpoIIIJ, and YqjG) are uniformly distributed. These results suggest FtsY delivers secreted proteins to SecYEG at the septum, consistent with initial septal localization of forespore membrane proteins.

Bacillus subtilis↗

Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the signal recognition particle SRPphi14-9 fusion protein.

The SRPphi14-9 fusion protein, which can functionally replace the SRP9/14 heterodimer in the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP), has been crystallized using the vapor diffusion method. Four different crystal forms were grown. SRPphi14-9 form IV crystals belong to the space group P4(1)22/ P4(3)22 with cell parameters a = b = 69.7 Angstroms, c = 95.7 Angstroms, alpha = beta = gamma = 90 degrees. A complete data set to 2.8 Angstroms resolution with an Rsym on intensities of 7.0% was collected on a single flash-frozen crystal.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Co-translational protein targeting catalyzed by the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle and its receptor.

The Ffh-4.5S ribonucleoprotein particle (RNP) and FtsY from Escherichia coli are homologous to essential components of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) and SRP receptor, respectively. The ability of these E. coli components to function in a bona fide co-translational targeting pathway remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that the Ffh-4.5S RNP and FtsY can efficiently replace their mammalian counterparts in targeting nascent secretory proteins to microsomal membranes in vitro. Targeting in the heterologous system requires a hydrophobic signal sequence, utilizes GTP and, moreover, occurs co-translationally. Unlike mammalian SRP, however, the Ffh-4.5S RNP is unable to arrest translational elongation, which results in a narrow time window for the ribosome nascent chain to interact productively with the membrane-bound translocation machinery. The highly negatively charged N-terminal domain of FtsY, which is a conserved feature among prokaryotic SRP receptor homologs, is important for translocation and acts to localize the protein to the membrane. Our data illustrate the extreme functional conservation between prokaryotic and eukaryotic SRP and SRP receptors and suggest that the basic mechanism of co-translational protein targeting is conserved between bacteria and mammals.

Animals↗