PubMed1985
Intravenous digital subtraction angiography (IVDSA) was performed in 11 patients aged from 23 to 62 yr to visualize vascular disease that required to be treated without delay: 7 were in shock preceded by a cardiac arrest in 5 of them; 4 suffered from acute renal failure, 8 from acute respiratory failure and one from brain death. 5 pulmonary, 2 thoracic aortic, 3 abdominal aortic, 1 right subclavian and 1 renal arterial angiographies were carried out by this method. In all the cases described, we either confirmed the diagnosis (rupture of thoracic aorta, type I aortic dissection, aneurysm of abdominal aorta, complete occlusion of the distal abdominal aorta, pulmonary embolism) or set aside diagnosis (lesion of the subclavian vessels, pulmonary embolism) or visualized the renal vasculature before removing the organ. No incident was observed. Conventional angiography remained a reference method but it presented risks which were not to be neglected in critically ill patients. Despite the theoretical limits set by the technical demands (absolute motionlessness, apnoea) and few other restrictions found in the literature, IVDSA seemed to offer distinct advantages under such conditions. Only requiring an injection using a catheter placed in a peripheral vein, this method was fast, safe and easy; it gave a close enough approach to the diagnosis to be able to help decide on specific treatment or on orientation towards a specific hospital department.