SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cancer Genes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Results of retroviral and adenoviral approaches to cancer gene therapy.

Genetic modification for cancer treatment has involved the introduction of chemotherapy protection and sensitization genes into normal and tumor cells, respectively, for the purpose of improving the outcome of conventional approaches to the treatment of solid tumor neoplasms. This paper will review the use of multidrug resistance-1 retroviral vectors and cytosine deaminase adenoviral prodrug activation vectors for this purpose.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed2026

Syncytium-forming HSV-1 in cancer gene therapy: From molecular mechanisms to clinical translation.

Gene therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for cancer treatment, yet challenges in efficient gene delivery remain a major barrier. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), as an oncolytic virus, has garnered attention for its potential in cancer therapy due to its replicative capacity, large genomic payload, and relatively low toxicity. Notably, syncytium-forming HSV-1 (SF-HSV-1) not only exhibits enhanced and sustained antitumor efficacy but also triggers profound immune responses. However, the exact molecular mechanisms orchestrating HSV-1-induced syncytium formation, its resulting cytotoxicity, and its precise role in immune modulation remain incompletely understood. This review aims to provide an in-depth exploration of the mechanisms underlying HSV-1 syncytium formation and its therapeutic implications in cancer gene therapy.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Tumor-targeting of viral vectors for cancer gene therapy by using antibodies or their genes against tumor-associated antigens.

Gene therapy is a promising modality for the treatment of malignant tumors for which conventional therapies are often inadequate. Various therapeutic genes have shown promise for tumor cell killing. However, successful gene therapy depends on the development of efficient and targeted gene transfer vectors. The aim of this review is to summarize the tumor-targeting viral vectors for cancer gene therapy by utilizing antibodies or genes against tumor-associated antigens.

Adenoviridae↗

PubMed2004

An overview of current delivery systems in cancer gene therapy.

The main objective in gene therapy is the development of efficient, non-toxic gene carriers that can encapsulate and deliver foreign genetic materials into specific cell types such as cancerous cells. During the past two decades, enormous research in the area of gene delivery has been conducted worldwide, in particular for cancer gene therapy application. Viral vectors are biological systems derived from naturally evolved viruses capable of transferring their genetic materials into the host cells. Many viruses including retrovirus, adenovirus, herpes simplex virus (HSV), adeno-associated virus (AAV) and pox virus have been modified to eliminate their toxicity and maintain their high gene transfer capability. The limitations associated with viral vectors, however, in terms of their safety, particularly immunogenicity, and in terms of their limited capacity of transgenic materials, have encouraged researchers to increasingly focus on non-viral vectors as an alternative to viral vectors. Non-viral vectors are generally cationic in nature. They include cationic polymers such as poly(ethylenimine) (PEI) and poly(L-lysine) (PLL), cationic peptides and cationic liposomes. The newly described liposomal preparation LPD (liposomes/protamine/DNA), for example, has shown superiority over conventional liposomes/DNA complexes (lipoplexes). Although non-viral vectors are less efficient than viral ones, they have the advantages of safety, simplicity of preparation and high gene encapsulation capability. This article reviews the most recent studies highlighting the advantages and the limitations of various types of gene delivery systems used in cancer gene therapy.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Cancer gene and immunotherapy: recent developments.

Gene and immunotherapeutic approaches to treat human malignant tumors are reviewed. Special attention is given to the different strategies of cancer gene therapy and to recent aspects of cytokine-supported tumor immunotherapy or tumor-specific vaccination. The limitations of these therapy approaches are critically discussed especially with respect to immune escape mechanisms.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Nitroreductase: a prodrug-activating enzyme for cancer gene therapy.

1. The prodrug CB1954 (5-(aziridin-1-yl)-2,4-dinitrobenzamide) is activated by Escherichia coli nitroreductase (NTR) to a potent DNA-crosslinking agent. 2. Virus-mediated expression of NTR in tumour cells sensitizes them to CB1954 in vitro and in vivo, providing the basis for a strategy of cancer gene therapy. 3. A phase I trial of CB1954 in cancer patients has been completed, documenting the pharmacokinetics and establishing an acceptable dose. Subsequent trials of the replication-defective adenovirus CTL102 in patients with resectable tumours have documented expression of NTR in injected colorectal liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, head and neck cancer and prostate cancer. Trials combining CTL102 and CB1954 are underway. 4. An oncolytic (replication-competent) adenovirus vector allowed increased expression of NTR in vitro and in a mouse tumour model, resulting in a greater reduction in tumour growth when combined with CB1954 treatment. 5. Alternative prodrugs may eventually prove superior to CB1954; a nitroaryl phosphoramide mustard prodrug activated by NTR shows a greater therapeutic index than CB1954 in a human ovarian carcinoma. 6. The crystal structure of NTR provided the basis for site-directed mutagenesis, which has identified a number of mutants with improved kinetics of CB1954 activation. These can provide improved cell sensitization to CB1954. Combinations of these are being tested. 7. The basis for a positive selection for improved NTR variants has been demonstrated.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Prostate cancer gene therapy: herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene transduction followed by ganciclovir in mouse and human prostate cancer models.

Prostate cancer is the most common internal malignancy in men in the United States. Most cancers are diagnosed when they are locally advanced or metastatic and there is no effective treatment. In this study we evaluated the effectiveness of cytotoxic gene therapy in human PC-3 and DU145 prostate cancer cell lines and in a rodent cell line, RM-1, derived from the mouse prostate reconstitution model system. The cell lines were efficiently transduced in vitro by a replicative-defective recombinant adenovirus (ADV) carrying the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene (HSV-tk). A virus titer-dependent sensitivity to ganciclovir (GCV) was observed. To determine a target therapeutic viral dose in vivo, subcutaneous tumors were generated by injection of RM-1 cells in syngeneic male hosts and injected with escalating doses of HSV-tk virus (5 x 10(7) to 1 x 10(9) pfu). The mice received GCV twice daily for 6 days and were sacrificed when tumor volumes exceeded 2.5 cm3 or when they appeared to be in distress. Because the two highest doses were equally as effective, further controlled studies were performed with the lower dose of 5 x 10(8) pfu with ADV/RSV-tk or a control virus containing the beta-galactosidase gene (ADV/RSV-beta-Gal) and treated with GCV or saline (PBS). The mean tumor volume in the treated animals was 16% that of control animals at 13 days. Histologically, treated tumors demonstrated necrosis and had a significantly higher apoptotic index. Survival data indicated that the treatment animals lived 7 days (21 in total) longer than the control animals, with 1 treatment animal being totally free of tumor. These results demonstrate that HSV-tk + GCV cytotoxic gene therapy can inhibit the growth of mouse and human prostate cancer cells in vitro and interrupt tumor growth of an aggressive mouse prostate cancer cell line in vivo.

Adenoviridae↗

PubMed2005

Conservation of cancer genes in the marine invertebrate Mytilus edulis.

Mussels are susceptible to a wide range of environmental toxicants, including carcinogens, and thus are often employed as bioindicator species. To elucidate the molecular aetiology of such neoplastic damage, we have cloned Mytilus edulis homologues of the vertebrate ras proto-oncogene, and p53 tumor suppressor gene. The M. edulis ras cDNA encodes a predicted protein of 184 amino acids. The DNA sequence analysis with vertebrate ras sequences demonstrates that the M. edulis ras cDNA is highly conserved in regions of functional importance, including mutational hot spots. The partial p53 sequence also demonstrates that M. edulis p53 is highly conserved in two regions of functional importance and that these regions also include four of the five mutational hot spots for this gene. In contrast, the M. edulis p53 sequence shows little similarity to the other published invertebrate p53-like sequences. The cancer gene sequences characterized herein will allow development of specific biomarkers of genotoxic damage.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1998

Cancer gene therapy: connecting basic research with clinical inquiry.

Molecular genetics has spawned an impressive outpouring of insights into the biology of neoplastic transformation and the host-tumor relationship. This deeper understanding of cancer pathogenesis presents a rich opportunity to develop novel therapeutic agents with improved selectivity for cancer cells. One promising approach involves gene therapy, which is the introduction of genetic material into a patient's tissues with the intent to achieve therapeutic benefit. A number of gene transfer systems have been designed that enable the genetic modification of relevant target cells, albeit with varying strengths and limitations. Several strategies to exploit gene transfer as a tool to target specific molecular defects intrinsic to cancer cells, enhance tumor chemosensitivity, and augment tumor immunogenicity are under intensive investigation. A number of these approaches have entered initial clinical testing and already provide intriguing new information about the biology of cancer in patients. In this review, I will highlight the critical issues and controversies that underscore preclinical experiments in cancer gene therapy, discuss some of the preliminary findings from the first wave of clinical trials, and speculate about the prospects that cancer gene therapy will change the way that cancer medicine is practiced.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2000

Cancer gene therapy: hard lessons and new courses.

Gene therapy for the treatment of cancer was initiated with high levels of optimism and enthusiasm. Recently, this perception has had to be tempered by the realisation that efficiency and accuracy of gene delivery remain the most significant barriers to its success. So far, there has been a disappointing inability to reach target cells with sufficient efficacy to generate high enough levels of direct killing and this has necessitated the invocation of bystander effects in order for any potential strategy to be convincing. At least in the foreseeable future, clinical advance will come from co-operation with other more established disciplines - such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy and immunotherapy. This is inevitable - and necessary - in order to prove that gene therapy can have efficacy as part of a combinatorial therapy, before hoping to move clinical mountains alone. In addition, there will have to be a thorough understanding of the clinical situations in which gene therapy will be used in order both to understand its own limitations, and to exploit its full potential. This will enable it to find the appropriate clinical niche in which its abilities will be optimally useful. Finally, anyone wishing to practise clinical cancer gene therapy will rapidly have to learn the ways of the free market and be able to juggle commercial necessities with ideological purity. Gene Therapy (2000) 7, 2-8.

Gene Targeting↗

PubMed2006

A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets.

Small noncoding microRNAs (miRNAs) can contribute to cancer development and progression and are differentially expressed in normal tissues and cancers. From a large-scale miRnome analysis on 540 samples including lung, breast, stomach, prostate, colon, and pancreatic tumors, we identified a solid cancer miRNA signature composed by a large portion of overexpressed miRNAs. Among these miRNAs are some with well characterized cancer association, such as miR-17-5p, miR-20a, miR-21, miR-92, miR-106a, and miR-155. The predicted targets for the differentially expressed miRNAs are significantly enriched for protein-coding tumor suppressors and oncogenes (P < 0.0001). A number of the predicted targets, including the tumor suppressors RB1 (Retinoblastoma 1) and TGFBR2 (transforming growth factor, beta receptor II) genes were confirmed experimentally. Our results indicate that miRNAs are extensively involved in cancer pathogenesis of solid tumors and support their function as either dominant or recessive cancer genes.

Gene Expression Profiling↗

PubMed2002

Cancer gene therapy with tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs).

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are of crucial importance for the invasive behavior of primary tumors and their metastases. MMP activity is regulated by the four naturally occurring tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs). It has been shown that overexpression of TIMPs in tumors of various origins leads to reduced tumor growth and formation of metastases. More recently, antitumor efficacy by in vivo gene transfer of TIMPs has been reported in several clinically relevant animal models. This review analyses the therapeutic potential of the TIMPs from a cancer gene therapeutic point of view with particular emphasis on cell culture and in vivo data.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

[Review of cancer gene therapy].

Since the first introduction of gene-marking technology to the clinical field in 1989 by Rosenberg et al, more than 4,000 patients have participated gene therapy clinical trials worldwide. Most of those patients had malignancies. Nearly 90% of clinical trials, however, are still in phase I-II stage, and only 3 protocols are in the phase III stage in early 2000. As current clinical gene therapy protocols are intended essentially to examine the safety and feasibility of the new strategy, more careful and steady steps may be required before these clinical trials really produce clinical benefits. Focused on cancer gene therapy, direct and indirect approaches are undertaken. In the direct approach, HSV-TK, HLA-B7, or p53 tumor suppressor gene therapies are the three major approaches historically. In for the indirect approach, cytokine or adhesion molecule gene-transferred tumor cells or immunocompetent cells are considered to be promising to enhance patients' antitumor immunity. In particular, we have concentrated on developing immuno gene therapy using GM-CSF-transduced autologous tumor cells. We have already recruited three patients with stage IV renal cell cancer. In all patients, peripheral blood T cells were mobilized after vaccination with GM-CSF-transduced tumor cells, and two of the three patients showed the persistence of cytotoxic T cells against autologous tumor cells. Clinically, one patient has been followed up with stable disease for more than one year since the start of vaccination. Further clinical studies are required to obtain conclusive results.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗

PubMed2004

Drug insight: Cancer cell immortality-telomerase as a target for novel cancer gene therapies.

Rapid advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of cancer development and progression over the past three decades have led to the design of new potential cancer therapies. High throughput target validation and expression studies are expected to yield a powerful arsenal of new cancer treatments, but untangling the complex pathways underlying the major cancer phenotypes remains a significant challenge. A considerable body of evidence in recent years implicates deregulated expression of a single multi-component enzyme, telomerase, as a causative factor at the heart of immortalization in the vast majority of human tumors. This review highlights the potential of telomerase as a target for novel cancer therapies. The potential of exploiting the selectivity of the telomerase family of genes within cancer cells to develop gene therapy strategies is discussed, and the progress towards translating these novel therapeutics from the laboratory to the clinic is reviewed.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗

PubMed2004

Application of a miniature biochip using the molecular beacon probe in breast cancer gene BRCA1 detection.

We report for the first time the application of a biochip using the molecular beacon (MB) detection scheme. The usability of this biochip novel detection system for the analysis of the breast cancer gene BRCA1 is demonstrated using molecular beacon probes. The MB is designed for the BRCA1 gene and a miniature biochip system is used for detection. The performance of the biochip-MB detection system is evaluated. The optimum conditions for the MB system for highest fluorescence detection sensitivity are investigated for the detection system. The detection of BRCA1 gene is successfully demonstrated in solution and the limit of detection (LOD) is estimated as 70 nM.

Biosensing Techniques↗

PubMed2006

Polyamine depletion and cell cycle manipulation in combination with HSV thymidine kinase/ganciclovir cancer gene therapy.

We have shown earlier that polyamine biosynthesis inhibition is accompanied by cell cycle alterations that can be utilized to enhance the efficacy of herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase - ganciclovir (HSV-TK/GCV) cancer gene therapy. In the present study, we asked 1) can the activated polyamine catabolism instead of biosynthesis inhibition be utilized to enhance the efficacy of HSV-TK/GCV gene therapy, and 2) can other known cell cycle inhibitors be used to make tumor cells more sensitive to this form of gene therapy? We show, using rat (9L) and human (U251-MG) glioma cell populations with 15% of HSV-TK-positive cells that DENSPM-induced activation of polyamine catabolism caused a profound polyamine deprivation in U251-MG cells, but there were no associated cell cycle effects in these cells. Consequently, we did not see any enhancement of the HSV-TK/GCV system. Aphidicolin, hydroxyurea, mimosine and resveratrol, but not lovastatin induced an apparent cell cycle arrest, followed by an intense but transient increase of the S phase cells after removal of the drug. This effect was shown to potentiate the HSV-TK/GCV cytotoxicity to some extent, especially in 9L cells and when the GCV treatment was started 0-24 h before the drug treatment. However, the enhancement was weaker than observed earlier with DFMO-induced cell cycle arrest and a considerable degree of the effect appeared to result from the growth-inhibitory actions of the drugs. In summary, we demonstrate that polyamine deprivation via DENSPM action is not associated with cell cycle effects and is not sufficient to cause enhancement of the HSV-TK/GCV system. Also, drugs with a rapid effect to the cell cycle are weak boosters of the HSVTK/GCV gene therapy, thus being less useful than DFMO for enhancement of this gene therapy form in animal studies and clinical trials.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Frequent, moderate-dose cyclophosphamide administration improves the efficacy of cytochrome P-450/cytochrome P-450 reductase-based cancer gene therapy.

Transduction of tumor cells with a cyclophosphamide (CPA)-activating cytochrome P-450 (P450) gene provides the capacity for localized prodrug activation and greatly sensitizes solid tumors to CPA treatment in vivo. The therapeutic impact of this P450-based cancer gene therapy strategy can be substantially enhanced by cotransduction of P450 reductase, a rate-limiting component of P450-dependent intratumoral CPA activation. The present study examined the possibility of further improving P450/P450 reductase-based gene therapy by using a novel schedule of CPA administration, involving repeated CPA injection every 6 days and previously shown to have an antiangiogenic component. 9L gliosarcoma cells transduced with the CPA-activating enzyme couple P450 2B6/P450 reductase and grown s.c. in immunodeficient severe combined immunodeficient (scid) mice were repeatedly challenged with 140 mg/kg CPA every 6 days. Full tumor regression leading to eradication of six of eight tumors was observed when the tumor size at the time of initial drug treatment was approximately 400 mm(3) (approximately 1.5% of body weight). Little or no overt toxicity of the repeated CPA treatment regimen was observed. The same CPA schedule was much less effective in inducing regression of 9L tumors that were not transduced with P450/P450 reductase. Repeated CPA treatment of mice bearing large, late-stage P450/P450 reductase-transduced tumors (approximately 9-16% of body weight) resulted in major (> or =95%) regression in 15 of 16 tumors, with tumor eradication observed in 2 cases. Although CPA resistance was found to emerge in the population of P450/P450 reductase-transduced tumors, this resistance primarily involved a loss of expression of the transduced P450 and/or P450 reductase gene, rather than development of intrinsic cellular resistance to the activated form of CPA. These findings demonstrate that repeated CPA treatment on a 6 day schedule can be highly effective when combined with P450/P450 reductase gene therapy and suggest that repeated transduction of tumors with prodrug-activation genes may be necessary to achieve tumor eradication and a sustained therapeutic response.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Cancer gene therapy: fringe or cutting edge?

Direct targeting of cancer cells with gene therapy has the potential to treat cancer on the basis of its molecular characteristics. But although laboratory results have been extremely encouraging, many practical obstacles need to be overcome before gene therapy can fulfil its goals in the clinic. These issues are not trivial, but seem less formidable than the challenge of killing cancers selectively and rationally--a challenge that has been successfully addressed.

Animals↗