PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Neuronal localization of cannabinoid receptors in the basal ganglia of the rat.

Cannabinoid receptors have recently been characterized and localized using a high-affinity radiolabeled cannabinoid analog in section binding assays. In rat brain, the highest receptor densities are in the globus pallidus and substantia nigra pars reticulata. Receptors are also dense in the caudate-putamen. In order to determine the neuronal localization of these receptors, selective lesions of key striatal afferent and efferent systems were made. Striatal neurons and efferent projections were selectively destroyed by unilateral infusion of ibotenic acid into the caudate-putamen. The nigrostriatal pathway was selectively destroyed in another set of animals by infusion of 6-hydroxydopamine into the medial forebrain bundle. After 2- or 4-week survivals, slide-mounted brain sections were incubated with ligands selective for cannabinoid ([3H]CP 55,940), dopamine D1 3H]SCH-23390) and D2 ([3H]raclopride) receptors, and dopamine uptake sites ([3H]GBR-12935). Slides were exposed to 3H-sensitive film. The resulting autoradiography showed ibotenate-induced losses of cannabinoid, D1 and D2 receptors in the caudate-putamen and topographic losses of cannabinoid and D1 receptors in the globus pallidus, entopeduncular nucleus, and substantia nigra pars reticulata at both survivals. Four weeks after medial forebrain bundle lesions (which resulted in amphetamine-induced rotations), there was loss of dopamine uptake sites in the striatum and substantia nigra pars compacta but no change in cannabinoid receptor binding. The data show that cannabinoid receptors in the basal ganglia are neuronally located on striatal projection neurons, including their axons and terminals. Cannabinoid receptors may be co-localized with D1 receptors on striatonigral neurons. Cannabinoid receptors are not localized on dopaminergic nigrostriatal cell bodies or terminals.

Animals↗

Decrease in prostaglandin level is a prerequisite for the expression of cannabinoid withdrawal: a quasi abstinence approach.

Cannabinoid withdrawal has been indicated in both human and animal subjects. One of pathways proposed to facilitate cannabinoid action is the arachidonic acid cascade. Previously, we have shown that prostaglandin attenuated the expression of withdrawal signs in tetrahydrocannabinol-dependent mice. It follows that the cascade might participate in the expression of cannabinoid withdrawal. We utilized a quasi abstinence approach (the induction of a state of cannabinoid withdrawal without giving any cannabinoid substances in a naïve animal) to describe the relationship between the change in prostaglandin level, an end product of the arachidonic acid cascade, and the expression of cannabinoid withdrawal. Administration of 10 mg/kg diclofenac, a prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor, i.p. 30 min before SR 141716A induced cannabinoid withdrawal signs in naïve mice, which were comparable to the true abstinence in cannabinoid-tolerant mice. In turn, 10 mg/kg Delta(8)-THC i.p., given 15 min prior to SR 141716A, blocked the expression of these signs. These results suggested that the decrease in prostaglandin level is a prerequisite for the expression of cannabinoid withdrawal.

Animals↗

Species comparison and pharmacological characterization of rat and human CB2 cannabinoid receptors.

Pharmacological effects of cannabinoid ligands are thought to be mediated through cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor subtypes. Sequence analysis revealed that rat and human cannabinoid CB2 receptors are divergent and share 81% amino acid homology. Pharmacological analysis of the possible species differences between rat and human cannabinoid CB2 receptors was performed using radioligand binding and functional assays. Pronounced species selectivity at the rat cannabinoid CB2 receptor (50- to 140-fold) was observed with AM-1710 (3-(1,1-Dimethyl-heptyl)-1-hydroxy-9-methoxy-benzo[c]chromen-6-one) and AM-1714 (3-(1,1-Dimethyl-heptyl)-1-9-dihydroxy-benzo[c]chromen-6-one). In contrast, JWH-015 ((2-Methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-napthalen-1-yl-methanone) was 3- to 10-fold selective at the human cannabinoid CB2 receptor. Endocannabinoid ligands were more human receptor selective. Cannabinoid CB2 receptor antagonist, AM-630 ((6-Iodo-2-methyl-1-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-methanone) was more potent at the rat receptor in radioligand binding and functional assays than that of the human receptor. The findings of the pharmacological differences between the human and rat cannabinoid CB2 receptors in this study provide critical information for characterizing cannabinoid ligands in in vivo rodent models for drug discovery purpose.

Animals↗

Peripheral nerve injury induces cannabinoid receptor 2 protein expression in rat sensory neurons.

We have localized cannabinoid receptor 2 protein in rat and mouse somatic sensory nervous system, using an antibody that recognizes mouse cannabinoid receptor 2. Little or no cannabinoid receptor 2 immunoreactivity was found in sections of naive rat or mouse dorsal root ganglia or spinal cord. This was in accord with the lack of detectable cannabinoid receptor 2 mRNA in (dorsal root ganglion) neurons by in situ hybridization experiments described in the literature. However, we could detect cannabinoid receptor 2 immunoreactivity following unilateral nerve damage-either by sciatic nerve section, or by spinal nerve ligation. It was localized to the superficial laminae of the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, ipsilateral to the nerve damage, coincident with the area of termination of damaged afferents which was marked by loss of isolectin B4 binding. This upregulation was not seen in cannabinoid receptor 2 null mice. The cannabinoid receptor 2 protein in spinal cord appeared to be expressed on sensory neuron afferent terminals as it colocalized with two markers of damaged afferents, namely growth associated protein-43 and the neuropeptide galanin. Moreover, it did not colocalize with markers of activated microglial cells (OX-42) or astroglial cells (glial fibrillary acidic protein) in rat spinal cord. In the peripheral nerve, accumulation of cannabinoid receptor 2 immunoreactivity was seen in nerve sections proximal, but not distal, to the ligation site, suggesting transport down the nerve from the cell bodies. Although convincing cannabinoid receptor 2 immunoreactivity was seen in neither uninjured nor injured dorsal root ganglion neuron cell bodies in tissue sections, expression was detectable in isolated, cultured neurons that had received a prior axotomy in vivo. This clear demonstration of CB(2) receptors on sensory neurons suggests an additional cellular target for CB(2) agonist induced analgesia, at least in neuropathic models.

Animals↗

Independence of, and interactions between, cannabinoid and opioid signal transduction pathways in N18TG2 cells.

N18TG2 neuroblastoma cells co-express delta-opioid and CB1-cannabinoid receptors. Both receptors are negatively coupled to adenylyl cyclase through pertussis toxin-sensitive GTP-binding proteins. In the present study, we confirmed the independent activity of opioid and cannabinoid agonists, and investigated chronic interactions between the two signal transduction pathways in these cells. Opioid and cannabinoid agonists stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) binding to N18TG2 membranes. When the opioid agonist etorphine and the cannabinoid agonist desacetyllevonantradol (DALN) were applied together, the stimulation was similar to the arithmetic sum of the two separate effects. This additivity existed even after partial ablation of the G-proteins reservoir with a low concentration of pertussis toxin, indicating that opioid and cannabinoid receptors activate different pools of G-proteins in N18TG2 cells. Chronic treatment of the cells with either opioid or cannabinoid agonists induced desensitization to the respective drug. In addition, asymmetric cross-desensitization was found: while long-term exposure to DALN induced homologous desensitization, and did not reduce the effect of etorphine, long-term exposure to etorphine attenuated the cannabinoid activation of G-proteins. Chronic exposure to either DALN or etorphine not only induced desensitization, but also elevated the basal activity of G-proteins in the exposed cells. The combination of the two drugs did not yield an additive activation, suggesting that chronic exposure of N18TG2 cultures to cannabinoid and opioid agonists modified a common responding element within the cells. This work presents the N18TG2 neuroblastoma as a suitable experimental model to study the molecular mechanism(s) underlying chronic interactions between opioid and cannabinoid drugs.

Adenylate Cyclase Toxin↗

The anti-inflammatory activities of cannabinoid receptor ligands in mouse peritonitis models.

In this report, we describe experiments in which cannabinoid receptor ligands were evaluated for effects on the development of a peritoneal inflammation when elicited in mice with thioglycollate broth or staphylococcus enterotoxin A. The cannabinoid receptor agonists [(-)-11-hydoxy-Delta(8) tetrahydrocannabinol-dimethylheptyl] (HU-210) and [(R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(4-morpholinyl)methyl[pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl](1-naphthalenyl) methanone] (WIN 55212-2) blocked the migration of neutrophils into the peritoneal cavity in response to these inflammatory stimuli. This effect was caused by a delay in the production of the neutrophil chemoattractants, KC and macrophage inflammatory protein-2. HU-210 and WIN 55212-2 blocked neutrophil chemokines and neutrophil migration whether administered subcutaneously (s.c.) or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.). Their modulatory effects on the inflammation were antagonized by centrally administered [N-(piperdin-1-yl)-5-(4-chloropheny)-1-(2,4-dichloropheny)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride] (SR141716A), a selective cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist. This latter observation, and the ability of the cannabinoid receptor agonists to suppress the peritoneal inflammation at relatively low doses when administered i.c.v., indicated a role for central cannabinoid CB(1) receptors in the anti-inflammatory activities of HU-210 and WIN 55212-2. The cannabinoid receptor agonists had no effect on monocyte migration elicited by thioglycollate, despite their ability to suppress monocyte chemotactic protein-1 levels in lavage fluids. The cannabinoid CB(2) receptor antagonist, [N-[(1S)-endo-1,3,3-trimethylbicyclo[2.2.1]heptan-2-yl]5-(4-choro-3 methylphenyl)-1-(4-methylbenzyl)pyrazole-3-carboxamide] (SR144528) inhibited the peritoneal inflammation in a manner analogous to that of HU-210 and WIN 55212-2 when administered i.c.v., but it did not appear to act through central cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. The present results add to the body of literature indicating that cannabinoid receptor ligands have diverse anti-inflammatory properties.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid pharmacological properties common to other centrally acting drugs.

Cannabinoids produce a characteristic profile of in vivo effects in mice, including suppression of spontaneous activity, antinociception, hypothermia, and catalepsy. Measurement of these four properties, commonly referred to as the tetrad test, has played a key role in establishing the structure-activity relationship of cannabinoids acting at cannabinoid CB(1) receptors. The purpose of this study was to determine whether drugs acting at noncannabinoid CB(1) receptors produced a similar pharmacological profile. Mice were tested in this paradigm after being injected with Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol and selected drugs from other drug classes. Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol dose-dependently produced all four effects with reversal by the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide hydrochloride (SR 141716A). Amphetamine, scopolamine, morphine, desipramine, pimozide, pentobarbital, ethanol, and diazepam were not fully active in at least one of the tests. Antipsychotics showed the greatest similarity to those of cannabinoids in the tetrad tests, although there were also distinct differences. Clozapine, haloperidol, thioridazine, and chlorpromazine (but not pimozide) were fully active in all four tests; however, unlike with Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol, their effects were not blocked by SR 141716A. Further, whereas antipsychotics produced nearly 100% catalepsy, maximal catalepsy produced by Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol was 60%. The mechanism through which antipsychotics produce these effects in mice is uncertain, but it differs from cannabinoid CB(1) receptor activation that mediates the effects of cannabinoids. While results of previous research suggest that the tetrad tests are a useful tool in examination of structure-activity relationships of cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists, the present results suggest that they must be used cautiously in the search for novel cannabinoid receptors.

Animals↗

Effects of cannabinoids on energy metabolism.

The present review summarizes the recent work carried out by our group on the link between signal transduction pathways and metabolic regulation systems as affected by cannabinoids. In cells such as astrocytes and lymphocytes, which express cannabinoid receptors, physiologically relevant doses of cannabinoids induce a remarkable metabolic stimulation as determined e.g. by enhanced glucose utilization. Studies performed in astrocytes show that the cannabinoid-evoked stimulation of glucose metabolism is independent of adenylyl cyclase inhibition, and seems to rely on the cascade CB1 cannabinoid receptor --> Sphingomyelin breakdown --> Ceramide --> Raf-1 --> Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) --> Glucose utilization. A role for phosphoinositide 3'-kinase in the stimulation of glucose utilization by cannabinoids is also put forward. In addition, ceramide generated upon CB1 cannabinoid receptor activation may enhance ketone body production by astrocytes independently of MAPK. Anandamide has also been shown to exert metabolic effects in hepatocytes, cells that do not express cannabinoid receptors. The biological role of cannabinoids as modulators of metabolism is as yet unclear.

Animals↗

The effects of cannabinoids on the brain.

Cannabinoids have a long history of consumption for recreational and medical reasons. The primary active constituent of the hemp plant Cannabis sativa is delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC). In humans, psychoactive cannabinoids produce euphoria, enhancement of sensory perception, tachycardia, antinociception, difficulties in concentration and impairment of memory. The cognitive deficiencies seem to persist after withdrawal. The toxicity of marijuana has been underestimated for a long time, since recent findings revealed delta9-THC-induced cell death with shrinkage of neurons and DNA fragmentation in the hippocampus. The acute effects of cannabinoids as well as the development of tolerance are mediated by G protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors. The CB1 receptor and its splice variant CB1A, are found predominantly in the brain with highest densities in the hippocampus, cerebellum and striatum. The CB2 receptor is found predominantly in the spleen and in haemopoietic cells and has only 44% overall nucleotide sequence identity with the CB1 receptor. The existence of this receptor provided the molecular basis for the immunosuppressive actions of marijuana. The CB1 receptor mediates inhibition of adenylate cyclase, inhibition of N- and P/Q-type calcium channels, stimulation of potassium channels, and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. The CB2 receptor mediates inhibition of adenylate cyclase and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. The discovery of endogenous cannabinoid receptor ligands, anandamide (N-arachidonylethanolamine) and 2-arachidonylglycerol made the notion of a central cannabinoid neuromodulatory system plausible. Anandamide is released from neurons upon depolarization through a mechanism that requires calcium-dependent cleavage from a phospholipid precursor in neuronal membranes. The release of anandamide is followed by rapid uptake into the plasma and hydrolysis by fatty-acid amidohydrolase. The psychoactive cannabinoids increase the activity of dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area-mesolimbic pathway. Since these dopaminergic circuits are known to play a pivotal role in mediating the reinforcing (rewarding) effects of the most drugs of abuse, the enhanced dopaminergic drive elicited by the cannabinoids is thought to underlie the reinforcing and abuse properties of marijuana. Thus, cannabinoids share a final common neuronal action with other major drugs of abuse such as morphine, ethanol and nicotine in producing facilitation of the mesolimbic dopamine system.

Animals↗

Cannabinoids reduce hyperalgesia and inflammation via interaction with peripheral CB1 receptors.

Central antinociceptive effects of cannabinoids have been well documented. However, relatively little is known about the peripheral effects of the cannabinoids on inflammation. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of peripherally administered cannabinoids on three indices of inflammation: carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia, carrageenan-induced edema, and capsaicin-induced plasma extravasation. In addition, we determined the effect of cannabinoids on capsaicin-evoked neuropeptide release from isolated rat hindpaw skin. Our results indicate that cannabinoids produce antihyperalgesia via interaction with a peripheral CB1 receptor. Peripheral, but not systemic, administration of 0.01 ng anandamide inhibited the induction of hyperalgesia. Peripheral administration of anandamide also attenuated hyperalgesia after its development via interaction with the CB1 cannabinoid receptor subtype as indicated by its reversal with the CB1 receptor antagonist SR 141716A. Additionally, peripheral, but not systemic, administration of 0.01 ng anandamide inhibited edema. Peripherally administered cannabinoids also interacted with CB1 receptors to inhibit capsaicin-evoked plasma extravasation into the hindpaw. One potential mechanism for the anti-inflammatory actions of the cannabinoids is the inhibition of neurosecretion from the peripheral terminals of nociceptive primary afferent fibers. This hypothesis is supported by the finding that anandamide inhibited capsaicin-evoked release of calcitonin gene-related peptide from isolated hindpaw skin. Collectively, these results indicate that cannabinoids reduce inflammation via interaction with a peripheral CB1 receptor. A potential mechanism for this effect is the inhibition of neurosecretion from capsaicin-sensitive primary afferent fibers.

Animals↗

Inhibition of GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents by cannabinoids in rat corpus striatum.

Electrophysiological consequences of activation of cannabinoid receptors have been mostly investigated on neuronal cell lines and on cells transfected with cannabinoid receptors. The aim of the present experiments was to study cannabinoid effects on identified neurons in situ. Electrically-evoked postsynaptic currents and voltage-dependent calcium currents were investigated in the principal neurons of the corpus striatum, the medium spiny neurons, with the patch-clamp method for brain slices. These neurons were chosen because they produce messenger RNA for cannabinoid receptors and because the density of cannabinoid binding sites in the striatum is high. Activation of muscarinic receptors by carbachol (10(-5) M) reduced inhibitory postsynaptic current amplitude by 67%. The synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist R(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-[(morpholinyl)methyl]pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4- benzoxazin-yl]-(1-naphtalenyl)methanone (WIN55212-2; 10(-8) to 10(-5) M) dose-dependently reduced striatal inhibitory postsynaptic currents; the maximum effect, inhibition by 52%, was observed at 10(-6) M. Another cannabinoid agonist, (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydr oxypropyl)cyclohexanol (CP55940; 10(-6) M), also reduced inhibitory postsynaptic currents, by 50%. The CB1 cannnabinoid receptor antagonist N-piperidino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)4-methyl-3-pyra zolecarboxamide (SR141716A; 10(-6) M) had no effect when given alone but abolished the effect of WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M). WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M) did not change the current evoked by the GABA(A)-receptor agonist muscimol (10(-6) M). Activation of muscarinic receptors by carbachol (10(-5) M) inhibited voltage-dependent calcium currents by 21%, but the cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 (10(-6) M) was without effect. The results show that activation of CB1 cannabinoid receptors reduces GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents in medium spiny neurons of the corpus striatum: the likely mechanism is presynaptic inhibition of GABA release from terminals of recurrent axons of the medium spiny neurons themselves.

Animals↗

Cannabinoids and cancer: causation, remediation, and palliation.

This review discusses three different associations between cannabinoids and cancer. First, it assesses evidence that smoking of cannabis preparations may cause cancers of the aerodigestive and respiratory system. There have been case reports of upper-respiratory-tract cancers in young adults who smoke cannabis, but evidence from a few epidemiological cohort studies and case-control studies is inconsistent. Second, there is mixed evidence on the effects of THC and other cannabinoids on cancers: in some in vitro and in vivo studies THC and some synthetic cannabinoids have had antineoplastic effects, but in other studies THC seems to impair the immune response to cancer. As yet there is no evidence that THC or other cannabinoids have anticancer effects in humans. Third, Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) may treat the symptoms and side-effects of cancer, and there is evidence that it and other cannabinoids may be useful adjuvant treatments that improve appetite, reduce nausea and vomiting, and alleviate moderate neuropathic pain in patients with cancer. The main challenge for the medical use of cannabinoids is the development of safe and effective methods of use that lead to therapeutic effects but that avoid adverse psychoactive effects. Furthermore, medical, legal, and regulatory obstacles hinder the smoking of cannabis for medical purposes. These very different uses of cannabinoids are in danger of being confused in public debate, especially in the USA where some advocates for the medical use of cannabinoids have argued for smoked cannabis rather than pharmaceutical cannabinoids. We review the available evidence on these three issues and consider their implications for policy.

Analgesics↗

Cannabinoids protect astrocytes from ceramide-induced apoptosis through the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway.

Cannabinoids, the active components of marijuana and their endogenous counterparts, exert many of their actions on the central nervous system by binding to the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor. Different studies have shown that cannabinoids can protect neural cells from different insults. However, those studies have been performed in neurons, whereas no attention has been focused on glial cells. Here we used the pro-apoptotic lipid ceramide to induce apoptosis in astrocytes, and we studied the protective effect exerted by cannabinoids. Results show the following: (i) cannabinoids rescue primary astrocytes from C(2)-ceramide-induced apoptosis in a dose- and time-dependent manner; (ii) triggering of this anti-apoptotic signal depends on the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway; (iii) ERK and its downstream target p90 ribosomal S6 kinase might be also involved in the protective effect of cannabinoids; and (iv) cannabinoids protect astrocytes from the cytotoxic effects of focal C(2)-ceramide administration in vivo. In summary, results show that cannabinoids protect astrocytes from ceramide-induced apoptosis via stimulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway. These findings constitute the first evidence for an "astroprotective" role of cannabinoids.

Adenoviridae↗

Cannabinoid receptor type 2 agonists induce transcription of the mu-opioid receptor gene in Jurkat T cells.

Opioids and cannabinoids are both associated with analgetic, psychotropic, and immunomodulatory effects. It has been suggested that both systems interact on multiple levels. We hypothesized that cannabinoids induce opioid receptors and investigated cannabinoid-dependent expression of the mu-opioid receptor subtype in a human T cell model. We report that activation of the peripheral cannabinoid receptor type 2 leads to a de novo induction of mu-opioid receptor transcription in Jurkat E6.1 cells. We show that interleukin-4 is transcriptionally induced in response to cannabinoids and that an interleukin-4 receptor antagonist blocks cannabinoid-dependent induction of mu-opioid receptors, indicating that induced expression of interleukin-4 is required in this process. Induction of interleukin-4 is blocked by decoy oligonucleotides directed against STAT5, indicating the requirement of this transcription factor. In addition, we show cannabinoid-dependent phosphorylation of STAT5. Further experiments demonstrate that interleukin-4 then induces phosphorylation of STAT6, which directly transactivates the mu-opioid receptor gene. In addition, STAT6 induces expression of the transcription factor GATA3, which also contributes to mu-opioid receptor gene transcription. The responsive promoter region of the human mu-opioid receptor gene with the binding sites for both factors was mapped to nt -1001 to -950. To demonstrate functional mu-opioid receptor proteins, morphine-mediated phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase was investigated. We show that phosphorylation of mitogen-activated protein kinase occurs only in cannabinoid-prestimulated Jurkat E6.1 cells and that it is blocked by the mu-opioid receptor antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH2. In summary, these findings provide a first example for cannabinoid-opioid-interactions in cells of the immune system.

Base Sequence↗

Microbiological transformations of nabilone, a synthetic cannabinoid.

A screening program was conducted to find microorganisms that modify the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone. After purification, the products from three cultures were analyzed by spectral methods to determine their chemical structures. An optically active 9S-hydroxy-6aR,10aR-trans cannabinoid was isolated from a culture of an unidentified soil bacterium designated A24007. From Bacillus cereus cultures were isolated a 9S,6'-dihydroxy-6aR,10aR-trans cannabinoid, a 9S-hydroxy-6'-keto-6aR,10aR-trans cannabinoid, a 9-keto-6'-hydroxy-6aS,10aS-trans cannabinoid, and a 6',9-diketo-6aS,10aS-trans cannabinoid. All of these products were optically active, as was a 9S-hydroxy-6aS,10AS-trans cannabinoid also isolated from B. cereus cultures. A series of acidic products were isolated from cultures of Nocardia salmonicolor. All of these products contained a carboxylic acid group at the terminal end of three-position alkyl side chains having varying numbers of carbon atoms. Two of the acidic products contained a 9-keto group, whereas all other carboxylic acid products were 9-hydroxy cannabinoids. The array of products obtained from incubation of nabilone indicates the usefulness of microbial transformations in the preparation of new cannabinoids.

Actinomycetales↗

Cannabinoid suppression of noxious heat-evoked activity in wide dynamic range neurons in the lumbar dorsal horn of the rat.

The effects of cannabinoid agonists on noxious heat-evoked firing of 62 spinal wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons were examined in urethan-anesthetized rats (1 cell/animal). Noxious thermal stimulation was applied with a Peltier device to the receptive fields in the ipsilateral hindpaw of isolated WDR neurons. To assess the site of action, cannabinoids were administered systemically in intact and spinally transected rats and intraventricularly. Both the aminoalkylindole cannabinoid WIN55,212-2 (125 microg/kg iv) and the bicyclic cannabinoid CP55,940 (125 microg/kg iv) suppressed noxious heat-evoked activity. Responses evoked by mild pressure in nonnociceptive neurons were not altered by CP55,940 (125 microg/kg iv), consistent with previous observations with another cannabinoid agonist, WIN55,212-2. The cannabinoid induced-suppression of noxious heat-evoked activity was blocked by pretreatment with SR141716A (1 mg/kg iv), a competitive antagonist for central cannabinoid CB1 receptors. By contrast, intravenous administration of either vehicle or the receptor-inactive enantiomer WIN55,212-3 (125 microg/kg) failed to alter noxious heat-evoked activity. The suppression of noxious heat-evoked activity induced by WIN55,212-2 in the lumbar dorsal horn of intact animals was markedly attenuated in spinal rats. Moreover, intraventricular administration of WIN55,212-2 suppressed noxious heat-evoked activity in spinal WDR neurons. By contrast, both vehicle and enantiomer were inactive. These findings suggest that cannabinoids selectively modulate the activity of nociceptive neurons in the spinal dorsal horn by actions at CB1 receptors. This modulation represents a suppression of pain neurotransmission because the inhibitory effects are selective for pain-sensitive neurons and are observed with different modalities of noxious stimulation. The data also provide converging lines of evidence for a role for descending antinociceptive mechanisms in cannabinoid modulation of spinal nociceptive processing.

Analgesics↗

Protective effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists against cocaine and other convulsant-induced toxic behavioural symptoms.

Based on the previously reported co-localization and relationship between cannabinoid and dopamine receptors, the effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists against cocaine-induced toxic behavioural symptoms, including convulsive seizures, were examined in mice. The anticonvulsant effect of several cannabimimetics against seizures induced by other convulsants was also compared. The cannabinoid receptor agonists CP 55940 ((-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)-cyclohexanol) and WIN 55212-2 ((R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl)pyrrolo[1,2,3-de]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenylmethanone), and the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide were co-administered intraperitoneally with cocaine (75 mg kg(-1)) or other convulsants such as bicuculline, methyl 6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-carboxylate (DMCM), L-glutamic acid and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA). CP 55940 (2.5 mg kg(-1)) and anandamide (15 mg kg(-1)) significantly antagonized cocaine-induced lethality, and CP 55940 and WIN 55212-2 (2.5 mg kg(-1)) significantly attenuated the severity of cocaine-induced convulsive seizures. Furthermore, ataxic hyperactivity, which was observed only in the cocaine-treated group of mice and could be evaluated by their activity counts, was also depressed in the groups of mice co-treated with each of the three cannabinoid agonists. However, none of these agonists protected against bicuculline- or DMCM-induced lethality or convulsive seizures. In contrast, all of the cannabinoid agonists, most notably anandamide, antagonized both L-glutamic acid (2 g kg(-1))- and NMDA (200 mg kg(-1))-induced convulsive seizures. These data support the previously reported close correlation between dopamine and cannabinoid receptors, and between cannabinoid agonists, especially anandamide, and glutamate (NMDA) receptors. Furthermore, these results suggest a potential therapeutic role for cannabinoid agonists against cocaine- and other-convulsant-induced toxicities.

Animals↗

Cannabinoids, immune system and cytokine network.

How cannabinoids influence immune function has been examined extensively in the last 30 years. Studies on drug-abusing humans and animals, as well as in vitro models employing immune cell cultures, have shown that marijuana, natural and endogenous cannabinoid compounds are immunomodulators. These substances modulate host resistance to bacterial, protozoan and viral infections as well as they can profoundly affect the Th1/Th2 response. Recently, two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, have been discovered. While CB1 is expressed primarily in the brain, CB2 is peculiar of the immune cells. Cannabinoid receptors have been shown to be involved in some but not all of immune effects. Nevertheless, their identification provides a specific mechanism of action in the attempting to find out how exogenous cannabinoids and endogenous cannabinoid system affect the immune apparatus, strengthen the hypothesis of cannabinoids as immunomodulators. As support to this theory, enough evidence exists to suggest that the cannabinoid system significantly affects almost every component of the immune response machinery and impacts the functioning also of the cytokine network. The evaluation of the biological consequences of these drug-induced cytokine changes has also dramatically become important considering not only the impact of cytokines on immune system per se but also envisaging their influence in cancer, inflammation, autoimmune disease, brain injury, hematopoietic colony formation in which cannabinoids have demonstrated a clear role as important modulators.

Animals↗