SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Genes, cdc”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Small molecule modulation of the human chromatid decatenation checkpoint.

After chromosome replication, the intertwined sister chromatids are disentangled by topoisomerases. The integrity of this process is monitored by the chromatid decatenation checkpoint. Here, we describe small molecule modulators of the human chromatid decatenation checkpoint identified using a cell-based, chemical genetic modifier screen. Similar to 1,2,7-trimethylyxanthine (caffeine), these small molecules suppress the G(2)-phase arrest caused by ICRF-193, a small molecule inhibitor of the enzymatic activity of topoisomerase II. Analysis of specific suppressors, here named suptopins for suppressor of Topoisomerase II inhibition, revealed distinct effects on cell cycle progression, microtubule stability, nucleocytoplasmic transport of cyclin B1, and no effect on the chromatin deacetylation checkpoint induced by trichostatin A. The suptopins provide new molecular tools for dissecting the role of topoisomerases in maintaining genomic stability and determining whether inhibiting the chromatid decatenation checkpoint sensitizes tumor cells to chemotherapeutics.

Acetylation↗

PubMed2003

Spindle checkpoint component Mad2 contributes to biorientation of homologous chromosomes.

Cell cycle checkpoints sense defects in chromosome metabolism, halt the cell cycle, and activate pathways that repair the defects. The spindle checkpoint arrests the cell cycle in response to defects in the interaction between microtubules and kinetochores (the proteinaceous complex assembled on centromeric DNA), but no repair function has been demonstrated for this checkpoint. We show that the roles of two spindle checkpoint components, Mad2 and Mad3, differ in meiosis I. In the absence of Mad2, meiosis I nondisjunction occurs at a high frequency and can be corrected by delaying the onset of anaphase. The absence of Mad3 does not induce nondisjunction, even though mad3Delta cells cannot arrest the cell cycle in response to kinetochores that lack either microtubules or tension on the linkage between chromosomes and microtubules. The two proteins have different roles in chromosome alignment. Compared to wild type and mad3Delta cells, mad2Delta mutants are slower to attach homologous chromosomes to opposite poles of the spindle. This observation suggests that Mad2 plays a role in reorienting chromosomes that are incorrectly attached to the spindle as well as delaying the cell cycle, whereas Mad3 is needed for the cell cycle delay, but not for chromosome reorientation.

Carrier Proteins↗

PubMed2004

A potential tension-sensing mechanism that ensures timely anaphase onset upon metaphase spindle orientation.

The spindle orientation checkpoint (SOC) in fission yeast has been proposed to delay metaphase-to-anaphase transition when the spindle poles are misaligned with respect to the long axis of the cell. This checkpoint is activated in the absence of either an actomyosin division ring or astral microtubules. Although the SOC could be overridden in the absence of the transcription factor Atf1p, its mechanistic nature remained unclear. Here, we show that the SOC-triggered metaphase delay depends on a subset of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) components Mph1p and Bub1p. Based on this finding and a detailed imaging of the spindle orientation process, we hypothesized that the spindle pole might contain proteins capable of sensing the achievement of spindle alignment. We identified the kendrin-like spindle pole body resident Pcp1p as a candidate molecule. A targeted mutation in its central domain specifically triggered the SOC in spite of the presence of oriented spindles, causing a metaphase delay that could be relieved in the absence of Mph1p, Bub1p, and Atf1p. Thus, Pcp1p might provide a link between the mechanical process of spindle alignment and the signal transduction that initiates anaphase.

Cell Cycle↗

PubMed2004

Dynamics of centromere and kinetochore proteins; implications for checkpoint signaling and silencing.

BACKGROUND: The mitotic checkpoint prevents the onset of anaphase before all chromosomes are attached to spindle microtubules. The checkpoint is thought to act by the catalytic generation at unattached kinetochores of a diffusible "wait signal" that prevents anaphase. Mad2 and Cdc20, two candidate proteins for components of a diffusible wait signal, have previously been shown to be recruited to and rapidly released from unattached kinetochores. RESULTS: Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching demonstrated that Mad1, Bub1, and a portion of Mad2, all essential mitotic-checkpoint components, are stably bound elements of unattached kinetochores (as are structural centromere components such as Centromere protein C [CENP-C]). After microtubule attachment, Mad1 and Mad2 are released from kinetochores and relocalize to spindle poles, whereas Bub1 remains at kinetochores. CONCLUSIONS: A long residence time at kinetochores identifies Bub1, Mad1, and a portion of Mad2 as part of a catalytic platform that recruits, activates, and releases a diffusible wait signal that is partly composed of the rapidly exchanging portion of Mad2. The release of Mad1 and Mad2, but not Bub1, from kinetochores upon attachment separates the elements of this "catalytic platform" and thereby silences generation of the anaphase inhibitor despite continued rapid cycling of Mad2 at spindle poles.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Comparative analysis of cytokinesis in budding yeast, fission yeast and animal cells.

Cytokinesis is a temporally and spatially regulated process through which the cellular constituents of the mother cell are partitioned into two daughter cells, permitting an increase in cell number. When cytokinesis occurs in a polarized cell it can create daughters with distinct fates. In eukaryotes, cytokinesis is carried out by the coordinated action of a cortical actomyosin contractile ring and targeted membrane deposition. Recent use of model organisms with facile genetics and improved light-microscopy methods has led to the identification and functional characterization of many proteins involved in cytokinesis. To date, this analysis indicates that some of the basic components involved in cytokinesis are conserved from yeast to humans, although their organization into functional machinery that drives cytokinesis and the associated regulatory mechanisms bear species-specific features. Here, we briefly review the current status of knowledge of cytokinesis in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe and animal cells, in an attempt to highlight both the common and the unique features. Although these organisms diverged from a common ancestor about a billion years ago, there are eukaryotes that are far more divergent. To evaluate the overall evolutionary conservation of cytokinesis, it will be necessary to include representatives of these divergent branches. Nevertheless, the three species discussed here provide substantial mechanistic diversity.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Spindle regulation: Mps1 flies into new areas.

Analysis of a mutation in the Drosophila Mps1 ortholog further demonstrates the universality of Mps1 function in the spindle checkpoint, but suggests Mps1 function in centrosome duplication might not be so conserved. The work also contributes new additions to a list of Mps1 functions that continues to grow with each new study.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

A phylogenomic inventory of meiotic genes; evidence for sex in Giardia and an early eukaryotic origin of meiosis.

Sexual reproduction in eukaryotes is accomplished by meiosis, a complex and specialized process of cell division that results in haploid cells (e.g., gametes). The stereotypical reductive division in meiosis is a major evolutionary innovation in eukaryotic cells, and delineating its history is key to understanding the evolution of sex. Meiosis arose early in eukaryotic evolution, but when and how meiosis arose and whether all eukaryotes have meiosis remain open questions. The known phylogenetic distribution of meiosis comprises plants, animals, fungi, and numerous protists. Diplomonads including Giardia intestinalis (syn. G. lamblia) are not known to have a sexual cycle; these protists may be an early-diverging lineage and could represent a premeiotic stage in eukaryotic evolution. We surveyed the ongoing G. intestinalis genome project data and have identified, verified, and analyzed a core set of putative meiotic genes-including five meiosis-specific genes-that are widely present among sexual eukaryotes. The presence of these genes indicates that: (1) Giardia is capable of meiosis and, thus, sexual reproduction, (2) the evolution of meiosis occurred early in eukaryotic evolution, and (3) the conserved meiotic machinery comprises a large set of genes that encode a variety of component proteins, including those involved in meiotic recombination.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

The Mad1/Mad2 complex as a template for Mad2 activation in the spindle assembly checkpoint.

BACKGROUND: The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) imparts fidelity to chromosome segregation by delaying anaphase until all sister chromatid pairs have become bipolarly attached. Mad2 is a component of the SAC effector complex that sequesters Cdc20 to halt anaphase. In prometaphase, Mad2 is recruited to kinetochores with the help of Mad1, and it is activated to bind Cdc20. These events are linked to the existence of two distinct conformers of Mad2: a closed conformer bound to its kinetochore receptor Mad1 or its target in the checkpoint Cdc20 and an open conformer unbound to these ligands. RESULTS: We investigated the mechanism of Mad2 recruitment to the kinetochore during checkpoint activation and subsequent transfer to Cdc20. We report that a closed conformer of Mad2 constitutively bound to Mad1, rather than Mad1 itself, is the kinetochore receptor for cytosolic open Mad2 and show that the interaction of open and closed Mad2 conformers is essential to sustain the SAC. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that closed Mad2 bound to Mad1 represents a template for the conversion of open Mad2 into closed Mad2 bound to Cdc20. This simple model, which we have named the "Mad2 template" model, predicts a mechanism for cytosolic propagation of the spindle checkpoint signal away from kinetochores.

Calcium-Binding Proteins↗

PubMed2005

Checkpoint signalling: Mad2 conformers and signal propagation.

The spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 has a tendency to form multimers and adopts at least two structural conformations. New work highlights the importance of the Mad2-Mad2 interaction, and suggests how spindle checkpoint signals are propagated away from kinetochores.

Calcium-Binding Proteins↗

PubMed2005

A large-scale screen in S. pombe identifies seven novel genes required for critical meiotic events.

Meiosis is a specialized form of cell division by which sexually reproducing diploid organisms generate haploid gametes. During a long prophase, telomeres cluster into the bouquet configuration to aid chromosome pairing, and DNA replication is followed by high levels of recombination between homologous chromosomes (homologs). This recombination is important for the reductional segregation of homologs at the first meiotic division; without further replication, a second meiotic division yields haploid nuclei. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, we have deleted 175 meiotically upregulated genes and found seven genes not previously reported to be critical for meiotic events. Three mutants (rec24, rec25, and rec27) had strongly reduced meiosis-specific DNA double-strand breakage and recombination. One mutant (tht2) was deficient in karyogamy, and two (bqt1 and bqt2) were deficient in telomere clustering, explaining their defects in recombination and segregation. The moa1 mutant was delayed in premeiotic S phase progression and nuclear divisions. Further analysis of these mutants will help elucidate the complex machinery governing the special behavior of meiotic chromosomes.

Chromosome Segregation↗

PubMed2006

Continuous ERK activation downregulates antiproliferative genes throughout G1 phase to allow cell-cycle progression.

BACKGROUND: The ERK family of MAP kinase plays a critical role in growth factor-stimulated cell-cycle progression from G0/G1 to S phase. It has been suggested that sustained activation, but not transient activation, of ERK is necessary for inducing S phase entry. Although the essential role of ERK MAP kinase in growth factor-stimulated gene expression, especially expression of immediate-early genes, is well established, it has remained unclear how ERK activity duration affects the promotion of G1 phase progression to S phase. RESULTS: We have found that inhibition of ERK activation by the MEK inhibitor or dominant-negative MEK1 even immediately before the onset of S phase leads to the cessation of S phase entry. Our analyses reveal that there are ERK-dependent downregulated genes, whose expression levels return to their original levels rapidly after ERK inactivation, and that their downregulation mostly requires AP-1 activity. Remarkably, microinjection experiments demonstrate that many of the downregulated genes act as antiproliferative genes during G1 phase and that their forced expression to the levels before growth factor stimulation even in late G1 phase blocks S phase entry. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, continuous ERK activation downregulates antiproliferative genes until the onset of S phase to allow successful G1 phase progression. This mechanism may also work as a fail-safe mechanism, which prevents inappropriate stimuli that induce transient ERK activation from causing S phase entry.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Checkpoint activation: don't get mad too much.

The Mad2 protein is required to delay sister chromatid separation until all chromosomes have been aligned on the mitotic spindle. Two recent studies provide new insights into how Mad2 contributes to this remarkable task.

Calcium-Binding Proteins↗

PubMed2006

Tumor formation via loss of a molecular motor protein.

Aneuploidy has long been suggested to be causal in tumor formation. Direct testing of this hypothesis has been difficult because of the absence of methods to specifically induce aneuploidy. The chromosome-associated kinesin motor KIF4 plays multiple roles in mitosis, and its loss leads to multiple mitotic defects including aneuploidy. Here, we have taken advantage of the direct formation of aneuploidy in the absence of KIF4 to determine whether loss of a molecular motor and generation of aneuploidy during mitosis can trigger tumorigenesis. We find that embryonic stem cells genetically depleted of KIF4 support anchorage-independent growth and form tumors in nude mice. In cells lacking KIF4, mitotic spindle checkpoints and DNA-damage response pathways are activated. Down regulation or loss of KIF4 is physiologically relevant because reduced KIF4 levels are present in 35% of human cancers from several tissues. Our results support the notion that loss of a molecular motor leads to tumor formation and that aneuploidy can act as a primary trigger of tumorigenesis.

Aneuploidy↗

PubMed2006

Telomere and telomerase modulation by the mammalian Rad9/Rad1/Hus1 DNA-damage-checkpoint complex.

Telomeres, the termini of linear chromosomes, are exceptional in that they are DNA ends that do not normally trigger a DNA-damage response (DDR) and are compatible with normal cellular proliferation. Mammalian telomeres are nevertheless a physiological substrate of the DDR apparatus, as shown by the fact that the inactivation of genes encoding certain DDR factors results in telomere dysfunction. However, how DDR factors are integrated with telomere physiology, including telomere length regulation by the specialized reverse transcriptase telomerase, is still largely unclear. Here we report that the mammalian Rad9/Rad1/Hus1 (911) checkpoint complex, which localizes to sites of genome damage and promotes DDR signaling, is an integral component of the telomere in human and mouse cells. By the use of quantitative telomere-length measurements, we demonstrate severe telomeric shortening in both Hus1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts and thymocytes from conditional Hus1-knockout mice. We also show that 911 is found in association with catalytically competent telomerase in cell lysates and is a positive regulator of its DNA polymerase activity. These findings identify an unanticipated function for the 911 checkpoint complex at telomeres in mammals and provide a mechanistic link between the activity of DNA-damage-checkpoint proteins and the telomere-maintenance machinery.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Timing and checkpoints in the regulation of mitotic progression.

Accurate chromosome segregation relies on the precise regulation of mitotic progression. Regulation involves control over the timing of mitosis and a spindle assembly checkpoint that links anaphase onset to the completion of chromosome-microtubule attachment. In this paper, we combine live-cell imaging of HeLa cells and protein depletion by RNA interference to examine the functions of the Mad, Bub, and kinetochore proteins in mitotic timing and checkpoint control. We show that the depletion of any one of these proteins abolishes the mitotic arrest provoked by depolymerizing microtubules or blocking chromosome-microtubule attachment with RNAi. However, the normal progress of mitosis is accelerated only when Mad2 or BubR1, but not other Mad and Bub proteins, are inactivated. Moreover, whereas checkpoint control requires kinetochores, the regulation of mitotic timing by Mad2 and BubR1 is kinetochore-independent in fashion. We propose that cytosolic Mad2-BubR1 is essential to restrain anaphase onset early in mitosis when kinetochores are still assembling.

Anaphase↗

PubMed2005

Do telomeres ask checkpoint proteins: "gimme shelter-in"?

Telomeres are complicated structures designed to allow one thing and avoid another. They allow replication of chromosome ends, an issue mostly about telomerase, which we seem to understand (though details of its regulation are works in progress). Telomeres must also avoid being detected as DNA breaks. This is important for two reasons: DNA breaks activate checkpoints that cause arrest of cell division, and DNA breaks engage repair machinery. Clearly, normal telomeres neither activate cell cycle arrest nor allow themselves to be repaired; arrest blocks cell division, and repair fuses chromosomes.

DNA Damage↗

PubMed2006

Contribution of DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint arrest to the maintenance of genomic stability.

DNA damage response mechanisms encompass pathways of DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoint arrest and apoptosis. Together, these mechanisms function to maintain genomic stability in the face of exogenous and endogenous DNA damage. ATM is activated in response to double strand breaks and initiates cell cycle checkpoint arrest. Recent studies in human fibroblasts have shown that ATM also regulates a mechanism of end-processing that is required for a component of double strand break repair. Human fibroblasts rarely undergo apoptosis after ionising radiation and, therefore, apoptosis is not considered in our review. The dual function of ATM raises the question as to how the two processes, DNA repair and checkpoint arrest, interplay to maintain genomic stability. In this review, we consider the impact of ATM's repair and checkpoint functions to the maintenance of genomic stability following irradiation in G2. We discuss evidence that ATM's repair function plays little role in the maintenance of genomic stability following exposure to ionising radiation. ATM's checkpoint function has a bigger impact on genomic stability but strikingly the two damage response pathways co-operate in a more than additive manner. In contrast, ATM's repair function is important for survival post irradiation.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗

PubMed2005

The fission yeast MO25 protein functions in polar growth and cell separation.

Proteins of the MO25 family are widely conserved but their function has not been characterized in detail. Human MO25 is a cofactor of LKB1, a conserved protein kinase with roles in cell polarity in nematodes, flies and mammalian cells. Furthermore, the budding yeast MO25 homologue, Hym1, is important for cell separation and morphogenesis. We have characterized Pmo25p, the MO25 homologue in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Pmo25p is an essential protein required for polar growth; in its absence the actin cytoskeleton becomes depolarized and cells adopt a round morphology. In addition, pmo25 mutants are defective in cell separation. Both functions of Pmo25p appear to be mediated by the Orb6p-Mob2p kinase complex. Pmo25p shows no distinct localization during interphase, but it is recruited to one of the two spindle pole bodies during anaphase and to the division site during cytokinesis. The septation initiation network (SIN) regulates the localization of Pmo25p, suggesting that it regulates Pmo25p function during cell division.

Anaphase↗