PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Histone Code”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Cancer and epigenesis: a developmental perspective.

Traditionally, molecular geneticists have studied the genome, that is, DNA. This has included its sequencing, with identification of promoters, enhancers, introns, exons, and mutations. During the last 10 to 15 years, it has become clear that this study of "naked" DNA imposed major limitations on our understanding of gene regulation, and that DNA must be studied in conjunction with its protein backbone (chromatin). This new vision has shown that chromatin is a very dynamic molecule, and that changes in DNA methylation, in histones leg, their localization, density, and whether they are acetylated, methylated, phosphorylated and/or ubiquitinated), and in the Polycomb-Trithorax equilibrium are all crucial for the control of gene expression. Furthermore, it was found that like DNA, chromatin-related proteins and DNA methylation are generally passed on unchanged from one cell to its daughters. Thus, gene expression is partly controlled through chromatin modifications that are transmitted from one cell to all its descendants. Such a control is referred to as "epigenetic," as the DNA sequence is not altered. Hence, these epigenetic "marks" can be erased in the early embryo, rendering these cells totipotent. This chapter presents a basic overview of epigenesis in the control of normal embryonal cell differentiation, including imprinting. Similarities between embryonal and cancer cells are highlighted, and the potential impact of chemotherapy aimed at epigenetic mechanisms is reviewed.

Alleles↗
PubMed2000

Core histones of the amitochondriate protist, Giardia lamblia.

Genes coding for the core histones H2a, H2b, H3, and H4 of Giardia lamblia were sequenced. A conserved organism- and gene-specific element, GRGCGCAGATTTVGG, was found upstream of the coding region in all core histone genes. The derived amino acid sequences of all four histones were similar to their homologs in other eukaryotes, although they were among the most divergent members of this protein family. Comparative protein structure modeling combined with energy evaluation of the resulting models indicated that the G. lamblia core histones individually and together can assume the same three-dimensional structures that were established by X-ray crystallography for Xenopus laevis histones and the nucleosome core particle. Since G. lamblia represents one of the earliest-diverging eukaryotes in many different molecular trees, the structure of its histones is potentially of relevance to understanding histone evolution. The G. lamblia proteins do not represent an intermediate stage between archaeal and eukaryotic histones.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2003

Genetic control of developmental changes induced by disruption of Arabidopsis histone deacetylase 1 (AtHD1) expression.

Little is known about the role of genetic and epigenetic control in the spatial and temporal regulation of plant development. Overexpressing antisense Arabidopsis thaliana HD1 (AtHD1) encoding a putative major histone deacetylase induces pleiotropic effects on plant growth and development. It is unclear whether the developmental abnormalities are caused by a defective AtHD1 or related homologs and are heritable in selfing progeny. We isolated a stable antisense AtHD1 (CASH) transgenic line and a T-DNA insertion line in exon 2 of AtHD1, resulting in a null allele (athd1-t1). Both athd1-t1 and CASH lines display increased levels of histone acetylation and similar developmental abnormalities, which are heritable in the presence of antisense AtHD1 or in the progeny of homozygous (athd1-t1/athd1-t1) plants. Furthermore, when the athd1-t1/athd1-t1 plants are crossed to wild-type plants, the pleiotropic developmental abnormalities are immediately restored in the F(1) hybrids, which correlates with AtHD1 expression and reduction of histone H4 Lys12 acetylation. Unlike the situation with the stable code of DNA and histone methylation, developmental changes induced by histone deacetylase defects are immediately reversible, probably through the restoration of a reversible histone acetylation code needed for the normal control of gene regulation and development.

Arabidopsis↗
PubMed2025

Post-translational modifications of the nucleoid protein H-NS: sites, mechanisms, and regulatory cues.

Histone-like nucleoid structuring protein H-NS plays a pivotal role in orchestrating bacterial chromatin and regulating horizontal gene transfer (HGT) elements. In response to environmental signals, H-NS undergoes dynamic post-translational modifications (PTMs) that resemble the epigenetic codes of eukaryotic histones. This review explores how environmental cues regulate PTMs at specific sites within distinct domains of H-NS, thereby modulating its oligomerization and DNA-binding capabilities to reprogram bacterial responses. Notably, HGT elements commonly encode counter-silencing factors, including PTM-modifying enzymes, that counteract H-NS repression. We propose that combinatorial PTM patterns on H-NS form the bacterial histone-like epigenetic code, regulating the expression of HGT elements. Collectively, these interactions establish a sophisticated network of silencing and counter-silencing mechanisms that drive bacterial genome evolution.

Protein Processing, Post-Translational↗
PubMed2025

Prediction of gene expression using histone modification patterns extracted by Particle Swarm Optimization.

MOTIVATION: Histone modifications play an important role in transcription regulation. Although the general importance of some histone modifications for transcription regulation has been previously established, the relevance of others and their interaction is subject to ongoing research. By training Machine Learning models to predict a gene's expression and explaining their decision making process, we can get hints on how histone modifications affect transcription. In previous studies, trained models were either hardly explainable or the models were trained solely on the abundance of histone modifications. Based on other studies, which used histone modification patterns, rather than their abundance, to identify potential regulatory elements, we hypothesize the histone modification pattern in a gene's promoter to be more predictive for gene expression. We used an optimization algorithm to extract predictive histone modification profiles. RESULTS: Our algorithm called PatternChrome achieved an average area under curve (AUC) score of 0.9029 over 56 samples for binary classification, outperforming all previous algorithms for the same task. We explained the models decisions to deduce the effect of specific features, certain histone modifications or promoter positions on transcription regulation. Although the predictive histone modification patterns were extracted for each sample separately, they can be used to predict gene expression in other samples, implying that the created patterns are largely generalizable. Interestingly, the impact of histone modifications on gene regulation appears predominantly indifferent to cellular specificity. Through explanation of the classifier's decisions, we substantiate established literature knowledge while concurrently revealing novel insights into the intricate landscape of transcriptional regulation via histone modification. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code for the PatternChrome algorithm, the scripts for the analyses and the required data can be found at (https://gitlab.gwdg.de/MedBioinf/generegulation/patternchrome).

Humans↗
PubMed1990

Isolation and characterization of a Drosophila hydei histone DNA repeat unit.

Histone genes in D. hydei are organized in tandemly repeated clusters., accomodating in total 120-140 repeat units. We cloned one of the repeat units and analysed the nucleotide sequence. The repeat unit has a size of 5.1 x 10(3) base-pairs and contains one copy of each of the genes coding for the core histones and one copy coding for the histone H1. In the promoter regions of the genes we identified the presumptive cap sites and TATA boxes. Two additional sequence elements are shared by all five Drosophila hydei histone genes in the cluster. The sequence CCCTCT/G1 is found in the region upstream of the presumptive CAP sites. The sequence element AGTGAA occurs downstream of the presumptive cap sites and is, in contrast to the promoter element, also seen in the histone genes of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell-cycle dependent regulation of transcription of the Drosophila histone genes may be different from that in other eukaryotes since sequence elements involved in the regulation of cell-cycle dependent transcription are absent. Also other regulatory elements for transcription differ from those of other genes. The highly conserved H1-specific promoter sequence AAACACA and the H2B specific promoter sequence ATTTGCAT, which are involved in the cell-cycle dependent transcription of those histone genes in eukaryotes, are missing in the Drosophila genes. However at the 3' end of the genes the palindrome and the purine-rich region, both conserved sequence elements in histone genes of eukaryotes, are present. The spacer regions show a simple sequence organization. The silent site substitution rate between the coding regions of the D. hydei and D. melanogaster histone genes is at least 1.5 times higher for Drosophila than for sea urchin histone genes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1979

Nonallelic histone gene clusters of individual sea urchins (Lytechinus pictus): mapping of homologies in coding and spacer DNA.

The linear arrangement and lengths of the spacers and coding regions in the two nonallelic histone gene variant clusters of L. pictus are remarkably homologous by R loop analysis and are similar in general topography to the histone gene repeat units of other sea urchins examined to date. No interventing sequences were detected. The coding regions of these two histone gene variants share considerable sequence homology; however, there are areas of nonhomology in every spacer region and the lengths of the nonhomologous spacers between the H2A and H1 genes are not the same for the two repeat unit classes (inter-gene heterogeneity). Combining length measurements obtained with both R loops and heteroduplexes suggests that the DNA sequences of the analogous leader regions for the two H1 mRNAs are nonhomologous. Similar observations were made for the H4 leader sequences, as well as the trailer region on H2B. S. purpuratus spacer DNA segments share little sequence homology with L. pictus; however, the analgous coding (and possibly flanking) regions have conserved their sequences. The various coding and spacer regions within a repeat unit do not share DNA sequences. Thus certain areas in the sea urchin histone gene repeat units have been highly conserved during evolution, while other areas have been allowed to undergo considerable sequence change not only between species but within a species.

Animals↗