PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Insurance Coverage”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Health insurance coverage and the job market in California.

This Special Report examines why the uninsured rate is so much higher in California than it is in the rest of the United States; it focuses on labor market and demographic characteristics that may explain the differential in health insurance coverage. California has the third-highest rate of uninsured for the nonelderly population in the United States, accounting for 16.6 percent of the total U.S. uninsured population. In 1998, 24.4 percent of the nonelderly population in California (both workers and nonworkers under age 65) was uninsured, compared with 18.4 percent uninsured in the United States as a whole. Only Arizona (with 27.2 percent) and Texas (with 27.0 percent) had higher uninsured rates than California. Among California workers ages 18-64, nearly 24 percent (or 3.8 million workers) were uninsured in 1998. Eleven years earlier, in 1987, 19.3 percent (or 2.7 million workers) were uninsured. During the decade 1987-1997, the percentage of California workers with employment-based health insurance declined from 68.5 percent to 64.2 percent. But more recently, between 1997 and 1998, the percentage of workers with employment-based coverage increased slightly from 64.2 percent to 65.5 percent. Fifty-three percent of California workers employed in the agriculture sector were uninsured in 1998. Overall, agriculture accounts for 4 percent of the jobs in California; however, agricultural workers accounted for 8 percent of the uninsured. Demographics are a key factor affecting California's rate of uninsured. Twenty-seven percent of California workers are Hispanic, more than three times the proportion in the rest of the United States. Compared with the rest of the country, California has fewer workers who are white (54 percent vs. 76 percent) or black (6 percent vs. 12 percent), and more workers who are Asian (12 percent vs. 3 percent). More than 43 percent of Hispanic workers in California were uninsured in 1998, compared with 14 percent of white workers, 24 percent of black workers, and 21 percent of Asian workers. California workers--and Hispanic workers in particular--are more likely to be employed by small firms, which are significantly less likely to offer health benefits than large firms. Forty-four percent of the California work force was employed by firms with fewer than 100 employees, or was self-employed, compared with 40 percent of the work force in the rest of the United States. Sixteen percent of all workers in California did not graduate from high school. Among Hispanic workers, 44 percent did not graduate from high school; among white workers, 13 percent did not graduate. In comparison, 18 percent of Asian workers and 7 percent of black workers did not graduate from high school. In California, 60 percent of Hispanics earning less than $7 per hour were uninsured in 1998. In contrast, 26 percent of whites, 46 percent of blacks, and 41 percent of Asians earning less than $7 per hour were uninsured.

Adolescent↗

New medical entities and delivery sites require specialized insurance coverage.

The addition of mid-level providers to the health care continuum and the development of off-site delivery has created new insurance coverage problems. Fran O'Connell, R.N., vice president of Shand Morahan & Company Inc., explains what to look for in coverage based on the level of care provided and the variety of care centers in use.

Group Practice↗

Knowledge of health insurance coverage by adolescents and young adults attending a hospital-based clinic.

PURPOSE: To describe adolescents' and young adults' knowledge about their health insurance, and to identify factors associated with correct knowledge of health insurance in this population. METHODS: Data were analyzed from a confidential questionnaire administered to 830 patients at a hospital-based adolescent medicine clinic. The questionnaire contained items pertaining to insurance type, demographics, health status, and health-risk behaviors. Actual health insurance data and information regarding utilization of health services were obtained from the hospital billing data-base. Predictors of health insurance knowledge were determined through bivariate analyses followed by stepwise logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 50.7% of respondents correctly identified their type of health insurance. Those who correctly identified their insurance had a higher mean age. Only 48.5% of participants who were 11-18 years old could identify their insurance type, versus 53.1% of 19-21-year-olds and 64.7% of 22-24-year-olds (p = 0.02). Sixty-five percent of Medicaid patients and 76.3% of hospital free care patients knew how their medical bills were paid, versus 17.9% of self-pay patients and 47.3% of patients with private insurance (p < 0.01). Greater utilization of health services was associated with increased rates of insurance knowledge among 19-24-year-olds on bivariate analysis; however, this factor was not significant when controlling for other factors. Regression analysis revealed that older age and insurance type other than self-payment were independent predictors of health insurance knowledge in adolescents (11-18 years old), while female gender and insurance type other than self-payment were independent predictors of insurance knowledge in young adults (19-24 years old). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of adolescents and young adults do not know how their medical bills are paid. Validation of self-reported insurance data is, therefore, critical both in clinical practice and health services research.

Adolescent↗

Trends in private insurance coverage for mental illness.

The authors analyzed data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Level of Benefits Surveys for the period 1979-1984 to examine coverage for psychiatric disorders in the private sector. While the overall number of employees with psychiatric benefits has increased, a greater percentage have more restrictions on those benefits. The extent of coverage is wide ranging, but there is little depth and the majority of psychiatric care expenses are not insured. Although the figures do not suggest a dramatic cutback in insurance coverage, the trends toward increased reductions in benefits for all health care threaten the more vulnerable psychiatric benefits.

Alcoholism↗

Changes in health insurance coverage during the economic downturn: 2000-2002.

Using Current Population Survey data from 2000-2002, this paper documents the changes that led the uninsured population to grow by 3.8 million during that time period. All of the increase in the uninsured occurred among adults, and two-thirds was among low-income adults. The extent to which the loss of employer coverage resulted in people becoming uninsured depended on their access to public programs: Children were more likely than adults to gain public coverage; women more likely than men; and parents more likely than nonparents. Middle- and higher-income Americans were also affected because many lost income and because rates of employer coverage were lower.

Adult↗

The association between socioeconomic status, health insurance coverage, and quality of life in men with prostate cancer.

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of socioeconomic status and insurance status on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes in men with prostate cancer. The design was a retrospective cohort study using multiple sites, including both academic and private practice settings. A cohort of 860 men with newly diagnosed, biopsy-proven prostate cancer of any stage was identified within CaPSURE, a longitudinal disease registry of prostate cancer patients. HRQOL was assessed with validated instruments, including the RAND 36-item Health Survey (SF-36) and the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index. Covariates included insurance status, education level, annual income, age, stage, comorbidity, Gleason grade, baseline PSA, marital status, ethnicity and primary treatment. HRQOL measurements were taken at 3-6-month intervals. Analysis of covariance was used to determine the effect of SES and insurance status on the HRQOL domains at baseline and over time. Patients with lower annual income had significantly lower baseline HRQOL scores in the all of the domains of the SF-36 and four of eight disease-specific HRQOL domains. No relationship was seen between annual income and HRQOL outcomes over time. Conversely, health insurance status was associated with HRQOL over time, but not at baseline. Health insurance status appears to have a unique effect on general HRQOL outcomes in men after treatment for prostate cancer. This study confirms the commonly held belief that patients of lower SES tend to have worse quality of life at baseline and following treatment for their disease. These findings have important ramifications for clinicians, researchers and policy makers.

Activities of Daily Living↗