PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Making Difficult Health Care Decisions”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 235 records · Page 13Linked to original sources

Lessons for health care rationing from the case of child B.

More details have emerged about the child B leukaemia case with the publication of the All England Law Report on the Appeal Court decision. At the time the view was widely held that the controversy might have been avoided if the responsible health authority had consulted the public. The law report reveals, however, that the courts adopted a moral language widely at variance with that of the patient's doctor. The courts were concerned to support a utilitarian decision procedure based on calculations of the greatest overall good; the doctor was concerned with the best interests of a sick child. The doctor-patient relationship may be damaged when public consideration transforms the issue in this way. Also, the Appeal Court supported a decision which claimed to have "weighed" opposing evaluations, but it excused the health authority from describing how that weighing took place. One of the main criticisms of the utilitarian approach, however, is that weighing of this type is extremely difficult to justify. By its ruling the court has made legal challenge on the grounds of inadequate consultation virtually impossible to substantiate.

Child↗

End-of-life decisions and advance directives in palliative care: a cross-cultural survey of patients and health-care professionals.

In order to explore possible differences in the scope of end-of-life decisions and attitudes toward advance directives (AD) in palliative care, we conducted a survey of 159 patients in palliative care institutions and 93 health-care professionals experienced in palliative care in the United States, Germany, and Japan. Giving an AD in this clinical setting was considered important by patients and professionals. The prevalence of a formal written AD was 79% in the United States, 18% in Germany, and 9% in Japan. In Japan, there was a high prevalence of entrusting all decisions to the family (known as omakase). More than 80% of the patients had negative feelings toward their future decisions in the United States and Germany, in contrast to only 45% in Japan. Although favored by the professionals, there were no specific instruments for obtaining ADs. In Germany and Japan, some patients had given an informal AD. As a pilot content validity step, survey results were used to derive a checklist for content and procedural aspects in end-of-life decision-making. This checklist may provide the basis for developing an instrument to guide physicians, especially non-palliative care specialists, in communication with their patients and their families in this difficult clinical situation.

Advance Directives↗

Guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: T-scores vs fractures.

The development of bone mineral densitimometry methodologies, especially central dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) methods have allowed this quantitative tool to be used to diagnose osteoporosis before the first fragility fracture has occurred. The World Health Organization osteoporosis working group set the stage for the BMD cut-off criteria development. The wide application of DXA has brought the treatment of osteoporosis to the primary care level, a very necessary step if this increasingly prevalent disease is to have a decline in its incidence. The most difficult osteoporosis cases, for which there are many and their associated difficult DXA results and interpretation will always require specialists' involvement. In particular, the embracement of the WHO absolute fracture risk validated project will take DXA to a much greater level of value in making management decisions. In particular, the WHO absolute risk data will allow physicians, health-economic policy makers, and payors of medical services to come closer together to decide which patients are at a level of unacceptable fracture risk that justifies treatment intervention. The implementation of this validated project will also remove the unacceptable subjective computer printouts on DXA reports that often lead to the over-treatment of low risk patients and at times the under-treatment of high risk patients. The evolution of the clinical interpretation of bone densitometry has been a work in progress. Challenges in the clinical measurement of bone strength remain and will also evolve. The field of osteoporosis has grown with the use of DXA and will continue to embrace this technology as other technologies to measure fracture risk become applied in clinical practice.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

Similarities and differences in choosing health plans.

BACKGROUND: Increasingly, consumers have multiple health insurance options. New information is being developed to help consumers with these choices. OBJECTIVES: To study similarities and differences in how the publicly and privately insured choose health plans. To explore the effect of traditional enrollment materials and reports developed by the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) on consumers' perceptions and decision-making. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using data from eight CAHPS demonstrations, we tested for significant differences across consumers with employer-sponsored insurance, Medicaid, and Medicare. SUBJECTS: Approximately 10,000 consumers with employer-sponsored, Medicaid, and Medicare health plans. MEASURES: Perceptions of the health plan selection process, use of information sources, and reactions to and use of traditional enrollment materials and CAHPS reports. RESULTS: Most consumers with all types of insurance thought that choosing a health plan was important and obtained information from multiple sources. Choosing a plan was more difficult for Medicare and Medicaid recipients than for the privately insured. When choosing a plan, Medicaid recipients cared most about convenience and access, whereas the privately insured emphasized providers and costs. The percentage of consumers who looked at and remembered the CAHPS report varied widely from 24% to 77%. In all but one of the demonstration sites, most consumers spent less than 30 minutes looking at the CAHPS report. CONCLUSIONS: Group sponsors and the developers of information interventions such as CAHPS may need to invest in developing and testing different reporting approaches for Medicare, Medicaid, and privately insured consumers.

Consumer Advocacy↗

Evaluation of medical practices.

Evaluation of the efficacy of a medical intervention requires valid measurements of both its benefits and risks as compared to those of alternative forms of management. The requisite measurements are more difficult to make than this simple description suggests, and the accumulation of information is further inhibited by certain characteristics of our pattern of health care. These features include, for example, discontinuous care by a variety of unrelated providers, inadequate records, the autonomy of physicians as decision-makers, financial disincentives, ambiguities in what we mean by "experimental" and "accepted" forms of therapy, and failure to see continuing evaluation as a necessary component of the cost of providing good medical care. Although no single change will solve all the problems of evaluation, several offer promise of improving our ability to choose from among medical interventions those most likely to be useful.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗

Ethics committees in critical care.

Ethics committees have emerged as a way for institutions to evaluate and resolve some of the difficult decisions facing critical care medicine. This article examines their origin, scope, function, and potential problems.

Critical Care↗

Psychological impact of the diagnosis of breast cancer on the patient and her family.

The diagnosis of breast cancer creates emotional distress for patients as well as family members. This article reviews studies on the psychological adjustment of women and their family members during the diagnosis, hospitalization, and early convalescence from breast surgery. Studies indicate that the diagnostic phase is an extremely stressful time for women, marked by high anxiety, uncertainty, and difficulty making decisions. The hospital phase is especially difficult for spouses, who must juggle work responsibilities with added home responsibilities and also spend time at the hospital supporting their wives. In the convalescent phase, patients and family members need to adjust to changes in family roles, cope with fears about recurrence, and learn to balance the needs of all family members. In order to provide high quality health care to breast cancer patients and their family members, physicians and nurses need to address the emotional as well as the physical aspects of recovery.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

The psychosocial impact on parents of tube feeding their child.

A review of 13 papers investigating parents' experience of long-term tube feeding in disabled children and young people identified a significant impact on parents and families related to oral feeding, decision making and tube feeding itself. Mixed messages and pressure from health professionals and relatives made decision making about tube feeding more difficult for parents. Making the decision to tube feed or proceed to gastrostomy was described in terms of 'giving in'. Parents expressed a need for consistent, accurate information. Once tube feeding was established there is a positive impact on the lives of the child and family - although some parents reported reduced support and continued feelings of inadequacy. The significance parents attach to oral feeding and their information and respite care needs when tube feeding must be recognised and further explored.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

An updated systematic review of interventions to improve health professionals' management of obesity.

The objective of this article was twofold (1) to determine the existence and effectiveness of interventions to improve health professionals' management of obesity or the organization of care for overweight and obese people; and (2) to update a previous systematic review on this topic with new or additional studies. The study design was a systematic review of intervention studies, undertaken according to standard methods developed by the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care (EPOC) Group. Participants were trained health care professionals and overweight and obese patients. The measurements were objective measures of health professionals' practice and behaviours, and patient outcomes including satisfaction, behaviour, psychological factors, disease status, risk factors and measures of body weight, fat, or body mass index (BMI). Twelve studies were included in the original review. A further six were included in this update. Six of the 18 studies were randomized controlled trials of health professional-oriented interventions (such as the use of reminders and training) and one was a controlled before-and-after study to improve collaboration between a hospital clinic and general practitioners (GPs). Ten randomized controlled trials and two controlled clinical trials of interventions comparing either the deliverer of weight-loss interventions or the setting of the delivery of the intervention, were identified. The heterogeneity and generally limited quality of identified studies make it difficult to provide recommendations for improving health professionals' obesity management. To conclude, at present, there are few solid leads about improving obesity management, although reminder systems, brief training interventions, shared care, inpatient care and dietitian-led treatments may all be worth further investigation. Therefore, decisions for the improvement of provision of services must be based on the existing evidence on interventions with patients and good clinical judgement. Further research is needed to identify cost-effective strategies for improving the management of obesity. A full version of this review (including detailed descriptions of the included studies and their methodological quality, and results and excluded studies tables) is available in the Cochrane Library. The Cochrane Library is a database of systematic review and other evidence on the effects of health care, continuously updated as new information emerges. It is available on CD ROM from Update Software. For further information see: http://www.update-software.com/cochrane.

Clinical Competence↗

Medical resource allocation: rationing and ethical considerations--Part I.

The United States' system of high-quality but expensive and poorly distributed medical care is in trouble. Dramatic advances in medical knowledge and procedures, combined with soaring demands created by growing public awareness, the cost of private hospital and medical insurance, and Medicare and Medicaid, are burdening the medical care delivery systems. The costs of medical care have reached levels that can no longer be sustained. Government officials, insurance planners, labor leaders responsible for union health care benefits, and ordinary citizens are questioning whether it is acceptable to limit health care based on economic considerations. If health care is deemed a social good, the method of allocation must be addressed. Unless society decides that other priorities of the infrastructure are to be subjugated to health service delivery, difficult decisions will be forced upon us, consciously or by default. The discussion in this two-part article explores the ethical considerations of the more formalized approaches to resource allocation that presently exist in our society.

Aged↗

Ethics in nursing homes: experience and casuistry.

The purpose of the study was to further explore the methods that nurses use to solve ethically difficult care situations in nursing homes while the aim of this article was to present a model for nursing practice in such situations. Fourteen nurses from three nursing homes in Norway were observed and interviewed in order to discern the strategies they used to deal with ethically difficult care situations. To analyse this information, we used a constant comparative method until a grounded theory emerged. The nurses' principal strategy was to apply earlier experiences while striving for the best outcome for the elderly patients. This article discusses this strategy and compares it to a theory of ethics called casuistry. We suggest that by using the method of experiences combined with casuistry in a more systematic way, nurses can develop acceptable solutions for difficult care situations in nursing homes.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Early management and decision making for the treatment of myelomeningocele.

A program for early selection and treatment of the infant with myelomeningocele was developed at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center in 1977. Over a 5-year period, 69 babies were evaluated, 36 babies were recommended for early vigorous treatment. Of the 33 babies for whom only supportive care was recommended, five were initially treated at the parents' request, two underwent delayed vigorous treatment, one was subsequently treated by "crisis management," one moved and did not return for follow-up, and 24 received only supportive care. All 24 babies died between 1 to 189 days of age (mean 37 days). The involvement of several physicians and paramedical support personnel is considered essential for this approach of early selection and treatment. Continued support and regular follow-up is necessary for any baby who receives only supportive care. Parents retain legal custody. Although ethical concerns make any approach difficult, the method presented is considered to be the best alternative available at this time.

Child, Preschool↗

Involving patients in decisions regarding preventive health interventions using the analytic hierarchy process.

Practice guidelines that recommend active patient involvement in decisions about preventive health interventions are becoming increasingly common. These decisions frequently involve difficult trade-offs between competing risks and benefits that require easily accessible information about the expected outcomes, superb doctor-patient communication, and effective integration of objective outcome data with individual values and preferences. Successful implementation of recommendations for shared decision-making in preventive health care will require the development of efficient methods for making these complex decisions in busy practice settings. This article describes how the analytic hierarchy process, a multiple criteria decision-making method, could facilitate successful implementation of shared decision-making regarding preventive health care in clinical practice. The method is illustrated using recent guidelines for colorectal cancer screening for average risk patients issued by the American Gastroenterological Association.

Journal Article↗

The remote practice network: new concept in health care delivery.

It is widely acknowledged that a trend toward greater competition is creating dramatic changes in the way that health care is provided in the United States. Physicians and hospitals, in particular, face a difficult period of adjustment as the nation's health care system increasingly turns toward the competitive model. Physicians, particularly those in leadership positions, must meet the challenge of competition by developing and implementing effective coping strategies. Medical directors and other physicians in key leadership and decision-making positions have a responsibility to their institutions, their patients, and indeed their own careers to recognize and understand the implications of current trends in health care delivery. This article discusses an innovative approach to competition in today's challenging health care marketplace.

Computer Communication Networks↗

Better cooperation and less measurement.

Baker and Norton offer an analysis for tackling medical error that, while not wrong, is very traditional in the policy solutions it recommends. The research priority should not be better measurement of error, but instead increased international cooperation to find solutions to existing problems. For instance, rather than developing new databases for mapping errors, existing databases should be utilized to create a learning culture that addresses existing problems. Within this, understanding errors in primary care is essential,and thus research should not restrict the study of errors to clinical situations. Changing the culture of medicine is difficult. A model of governance that emphasizes quality and accountability may be a mechanism for developing a culture within medicine that reduces error and improves patient safety.

Canada↗

Protocolized weaning from mechanical ventilation: ICU physicians' views.

BACKGROUND: The use of protocols during weaning from mechanical ventilation is uncommon in the UK, despite research pointing to their potential benefits. This may be because the research evidence is considered not to apply in different settings. Intensive care unit consultant physicians are the major decision-makers in weaning in the UK and any attempt to introduce protocolized weaning will require consideration of their views. AIM: The aim of this paper is to report a study exploring intensive care physicians' views on (i) weaning from mechanical ventilation, (ii) the utility of weaning protocols and (iii) nurses' roles in the weaning process. A specific goal was to identify potential aids and barriers to developing weaning protocols and their introduction into clinical practice. METHODS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 10 consultant physicians in two intensive care units in Northern Ireland and subjected to content analysis. FINDINGS: The primary themes identified were (i) information required for weaning decisions and clinical judgement, (ii) professional boundaries, (iii) protocol issues and (iv) timing of weaning. Three types of information were deemed to be required for weaning decisions - empirical objective, empirical subjective and abstract - and interviewees considered that it would be challenging to incorporate all into a protocol. They were divided on whether protocols were useful when nursing experience was limited. Some groups of patients were thought more suitable than others for protocolized weaning. CONCLUSIONS: Although local physicians were supportive in theory, introduction of protocolized weaning is likely to be difficult because of the breadth of information required for successful decision-making. Consultant views in this study were not consistent with American findings that physicians' caution may unnecessarily prolong weaning.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Maternal identity change as a consequence of antenatal hospitalization.

Despite low fertility rates in Western countries, maternity remains one of the major goals of women from various socioeconomic backgrounds. While most women will have low-risk pregnancies, common serious disorders of pregnancy, such as preeclampsia, premature rupture of the membranes, placenta previa, or fetal growth restriction, may compromise maternal and infant outcomes. The experiences of urban and rural women in Australia who have had difficulties in maintaining their pregnancies are analyzed in this article. We study the impact of individual and social factors that facilitate or impede women's adjustment to the risks associated with these disorders. The analysis of in-depth interviews with 27 women hospitalized antenatally indicates that most women were unfamiliar with the diagnoses and acted as passive "decision takers," complying with medical advice to remain in the hospital. Admission to a tertiary hospital ward that provided care to women with pregnancy disorders promoted the formation of a new identity, that of a woman whose pregnancy did not follow the expected path. Further, hospitalization offered women the opportunity to interact with others in similar difficult situations and, hence, feel less isolated.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

Can our health services be saved by technology evaluation? The Quebec experience.

The finances to support our health services at their present level are lacking, and much of the shortage is due to new health technologies. Through the utilisation of technology assessment (TA), it is hoped that we may be able to eliminate useless technologies and that the money so saved will allow us to maintain our health care services intact. Such hopes are exaggerated. The uses and limitations of TA are reviewed in the light of recent experience gained with the Conseil d'évaluation des technologies du Québec. Technology assessment has only limited value in exposing ineffective technologies. More often, it can illuminate inappropriate use of technologies. However, its real value lies elsewhere, namely in making difficult choices between different technologies. An example is the choice between expensive, low osmolar contrast media in radiology and the cheaper, high osmolar material which causes more frequent reactions. Credible estimates of how much benefit will result from the commitment of how many extra dollars can facilitate such decisions. However, the user must clearly understand the limitations of cost-effectiveness estimates, which should never be used for policy purposes without full knowledge of all the qualifiers on which the estimates depend.

Canada↗