PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

Pharmacological actions of cannabinoids.

Mammalian tissues express at least two types of cannabinoid receptor, CB1 and CB2, both G protein coupled. CB1 receptors are expressed predominantly at nerve terminals where they mediate inhibition of transmitter release. CB2 receptors are found mainly on immune cells, one of their roles being to modulate cytokine release. Endogenous ligands for these receptors (endocannabinoids) also exist. These are all eicosanoids; prominent examples include arachidonoylethanolamide (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol. These discoveries have led to the development of CB1- and CB2-selective agonists and antagonists and of bioassays for characterizing such ligands. Cannabinoid receptor antagonists include the CB1-selective SR141716A, AM251, AM281 and LY320135, and the CB2-selective SR144528 and AM630. These all behave as inverse agonists, one indication that CB1 and CB2 receptors can exist in a constitutively active state. Neutral cannabinoid receptor antagonists that seem to lack inverse agonist properties have recently also been developed. As well as acting on CB1 and CB2 receptors, there is convincing evidence that anandamide can activate transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) receptors. Certain cannabinoids also appear to have non-CB1, non-CB2, non-TRPV1 targets, for example CB2-like receptors that can mediate antinociception and "abnormal-cannabidiol" receptors that mediate vasorelaxation and promote microglial cell migration. There is evidence too for TRPV1-like receptors on glutamatergic neurons, for alpha2-adrenoceptor-like (imidazoline) receptors at sympathetic nerve terminals, for novel G protein-coupled receptors for R-(+)-WIN55212 and anandamide in the brain and spinal cord, for novel receptors for delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabinol on perivascular sensory nerves and for novel anandamide receptors in the gastro-intestinal tract. The presence of allosteric sites for cannabinoids on various ion channels and non-cannabinoid receptors has also been proposed. In addition, more information is beginning to emerge about the pharmacological actions of the non-psychoactive plant cannabinoid, cannabidiol. These recent advances in cannabinoid pharmacology are all discussed in this review.

Animals↗

Inhibitory effect of cannabinoid agonists on gastric emptying in the rat.

We have studied the effect of WIN 55,212-2 (a psychoactive cannabinoid agonist), cannabinol (a nonpsychoactive cannabinoid agonist), SR141716A, a cannabinoid CB1 antagonist, and SR144528, a cannabinoid CB2 antagonist, on gastric emptying in the rat. WIN 55,212-2 (0.1-5 mg/kg, i.p.) and cannabinol (0.1-25 mg/kg, i.p.) dose-dependently delayed gastric emptying while SR141716A (1 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg) and SR144528 (1 mg/kg) were without effect. SR141716A (1 mg/kg), but not SR144528 (1 mg/kg), counteracted the inhibitory effect of the two cannabinoid agonists. These results suggest that cannabinoid agonists delay gastric emptying through activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors, while the endogenous cannabinoid system does not seem to modulate gastric motility.

Analgesics↗

Role of lipids and lipid signaling in the development of cannabinoid tolerance.

Cannabinoid agonists such as Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) produce a wide range of pharmacological effects both in the central nervous system and in the periphery. One of the most striking features of cannabinoids such as THC is the magnitude to tolerance that can be produced upon repetitive administration of this substance to animals. Relatively modest dosing regimens are capable of producing significant tolerance, whereas greater than 100-fold tolerance can be obtained with aggressive treatments. While cannabinoid tolerance has been studied quite extensively to establish its relevance to the health consequences of marijuana use, it has also proven to be a valuable strategy in understanding the mechanism of action of cannabinoids. The discovery of the endocannabinoid system that contains two receptor subtypes, CB1 and CB2, associated signaling pathways, endocannabinoids (anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol) and their synthetic and degradative pathways has provided a means of systematically evaluating the mechanism of cannabinoid tolerance. It is well known that the CB1 cannabinoid receptor is down-regulated in states of cannabinoid tolerance along with uncoupling from its second messenger systems. Endocannabinoid levels are also altered in selected brain regions during the development of tolerance. While it is reasonable to speculate that a likely relationship exists between receptor and endocannabinoid levels, at present, little is known regarding the biological signal that leads to alterations in endocannabinoid levels. It is also unknown to what degree synthetic and degradative pathways for the endocannabinoids are altered in states of tolerance. The discovery that the brain is abundant in fatty acid amides and glycerols raises the question as to what roles these lipids contribute to the endocannabinoid system. Some of these lipids also utilize the endocannabinoid metabolic pathways, produce similar pharmacological effects, and are capable of modulating the actions of anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol. In addition, there are dopamine, glycine, and serotonin conjugates of arachidonic acid that may also contribute to the actions of endocannabinoids. A systematic examination of these lipids in cannabinoid tolerance might shed light on their physiological relevance to the endocannabinoid system.

Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators↗

Detection of cannabinoid agonist evoked increase in BOLD contrast in rats using functional magnetic resonance imaging.

BOLD-contrast functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to investigate the effects of the synthetic cannabinoid agonist HU210 on the rat brain in order to determine potential CNS sites of action for the functional effects of cannabinoids. After obtaining basal data, rats (n=8) were given the cannabinoid agonist HU210 (10 microg/kg i.v.) and volume data sets collected for 85 mins. Significant increases in functional BOLD activity were observed in specific brain regions including those important in pain (PAG), reward (VTA and accumbens) and motor function (striatum). In order to confirm cannabinoid receptor involvement in the HU210 evoked functional BOLD activity, rats (n=8) were pre-treated with the CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (100 microg/kg i.v.) prior to HU210. Pretreatment with SR141716A abolished all significant evoked HU210 functional BOLD activity. To exclude the involvement of potential systemic effects induced by the cannabinoid agonist administration on the observed evoked functional BOLD activity a separate experiment investigated the effect of HU210 (10 microg/kg i.v.) on mean arterial pressure and showed that HU210 had no significant effect on pressure under chloral hydrate anaesthesia. In summary, this study demonstrates that the cannabinoid agonist HU210 evokes a significant increase in BOLD functional activity in specific regions and that this was cannabinoid receptor mediated. Furthermore the study indicates the potential value of fMRI in rodents to delineate pharmacologically induced changes in regional brain function.

Animals↗

Cannabinoids augment the release of neuropeptide Y in the rat hypothalamus.

Little is known about the mechanism of action behind the orexigenic activity of cannabinoids. Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most potent orexigenic factors and is a key mediator in the hypothalamic control of food intake. We examined the effect of cannabinoids on NPY release using a rat hypothalamic explant model. The cannabinoid agonists anandamide (AEA) and CP55,940 both significantly augmented resting and KCl-evoked NPY release. AM251, a cannabinoid receptor antagonist, blocked the augmentation of NPY release elicited by AEA and CP55,940. Additionally, AM251 administered alone, in the absence of exogenous cannabinoid agonists, inhibited NPY release demonstrating the role of endogenous cannabinoids in NPY release. Combined, these findings demonstrate that cannabinoids augment NPY release in the hypothalamus and that this may be a potential mechanism behind the orexigenic activity of cannabinoids.

Analgesics↗

Cannabinoids inhibit pre- and postjunctionally sympathetic neurotransmission in rat mesenteric arteries.

The effects of cannabinoids on sympathetic neurotransmission in the rat isolated perfused mesenteric arterial bed, were investigated. Electrically evoked sympathetic neurogenic vasocontraction was inhibited by the cannabinoid receptor agonists 11-hydroxy-dimethylheptyl-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol (HU210), (-)-cis-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]trans-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)-cyclohexanol (CP55,940) and methanandamide, and by (+)-11-hydroxy-Delta(8)-tetrahydrocannabinol (HU211), a (+)-stereoisomer of HU210. The inhibition was unaffected by cannabinoid CB(1) and CB(2) receptor antagonists. Electrically evoked release of endogenous noradrenaline from sympathetic nerves was inhibited by HU210, but not by HU211. Inhibition was blocked by a cannabinoid CB(1), but not a CB(2), receptor antagonist. HU210 attenuated contractions to noradrenaline, and all of the cannabinoids blocked contractions to KCl. Capsaicin pre-treatment had no significant effect on HU210- and CP55,940-mediated inhibition of sympathetic neurogenic contraction, but partly blocked inhibition mediated by methanandamide. These data show that cannabinoids can inhibit, by distinct pre- and postjunctional actions, sympathetic neurotransmission in the rat mesenteric arterial bed. The pre-junctional action is mediated by a cannabinoid CB(1)-like receptor, but the postjunctional action does not appear to involve either cannabinoid CB(1) or CB(2) receptors.

Adrenergic Fibers↗

Molecular biology of cannabinoid receptors.

During the last decade, research on the molecular biology and genetics of cannabinoid receptors has led to a remarkable progress in understanding of the endogenous cannabinoid system, which functions in a plethora of physiological processes in the animal. At present, two types of cannabinoid receptors have been cloned from many vertebrates, and three endogenous ligands (the endocannabinoids arachidonoyl ethanolamide, 2-arachidonoyl glycerol and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol ether) have been characterized. Cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB(1)) is expressed predominantly in the central and peripheral nervous system, while cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB(2)) is present almost exclusively in immune cells. Cannabinoid receptors have not yet been cloned from invertebrates, but binding proteins for endocannabinoids, endocannabinoids and metabolic enzyme activity have been described in a variety of invertebrates except for molting invertebrates such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila. In the central nervous system of mammals, there is strong evidence emerging that the CB(1) and its ligands comprise a neuromodulatory system functionally interacting with other neurotransmitter systems. Furthermore, the presynaptic localization of CB(1) together with the results obtained from electrophysiological experiments strengthen the notion that in cerebellum and hippocampus and possibly in other regions of the central nervous system, endocannabinoids may act as retrograde messengers to suppress neurotransmitter release at the presynaptic site. Many recent studies using genetically modified mouse lines which lack CB(1) and/or CB(2) finally could show the importance of cannabinoid receptors in animal physiology and will contribute to unravel the full complexity of the cannabinoid system.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Cannabinoids induce glioma stem-like cell differentiation and inhibit gliomagenesis.

Glioma stem-like cells constitute one of the potential origins of gliomas, and therefore, their elimination is an essential factor for the development of efficient therapeutic strategies. Cannabinoids are known to exert an antitumoral action on gliomas that relies on at least two mechanisms: induction of apoptosis of transformed cells and inhibition of tumor angiogenesis. However, whether cannabinoids target human glioma stem cells and their potential impact in gliomagenesis are unknown. Here, we show that glioma stem-like cells derived from glioblastoma multiforme biopsies and the glioma cell lines U87MG and U373MG express cannabinoid type 1 (CB(1)) and type 2 (CB(2)) receptors and other elements of the endocannabinoid system. In gene array experiments, CB receptor activation altered the expression of genes involved in the regulation of stem cell proliferation and differentiation. The cannabinoid agonists HU-210 and JWH-133 promoted glial differentiation in a CB receptor-dependent manner as shown by the increased number of S-100beta- and glial fibrillary acidic protein-expressing cells. In parallel, cannabinoids decreased the cell population expressing the neuroepithelial progenitor marker nestin. Moreover, cannabinoid challenge decreased the efficiency of glioma stem-like cells to initiate glioma formation in vivo, a finding that correlated with decreased neurosphere formation and cell proliferation in secondary xenografts. Gliomas derived from cannabinoid-treated cancer stem-like cells were characterized with a panel of neural markers and evidenced a more differentiated phenotype and a concomitant decrease in nestin expression. Overall, our results demonstrate that cannabinoids target glioma stem-like cells, promote their differentiation, and inhibit gliomagenesis, thus giving further support to their potential use in the management of malignant gliomas.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid receptor ligands: clinical and neuropharmacological considerations, relevant to future drug discovery and development.

This review highlights some important advances that have taken place in cannabinoid research over the last four years. It focuses on novel ligands that are of interest either as experimental tools or as lead compounds for therapeutic agents and possible clinical applications for some of these ligands. The molecular targets for these compounds are various components of the system of endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids) and receptors that together constitute the 'endocannabinoid system'. These are CB(1) cannabinoid receptors that are present mainly on central and peripheral neurones, CB(2) cannabinoid receptors that are expressed predominantly by immune cells, the biochemical mechanisms responsible for the tissue uptake or metabolism of endocannabinoids and vanilloid receptors. Other cannabinoid receptor types may also exist. Recently developed ligands include potent and selective agonists for CB(1) and CB(2) receptors, a potent CB(2)-selective antagonist/inverse agonist and inhibitors of endocannabinoid uptake or metabolism. Future research should be directed at characterising the endocannabinoid system more completely and at obtaining more conclusive clinical data about the possible beneficial effects of cannabinoids as well as their adverse effects. There is also a need for improved cannabinoid formulations/modes of administration in the clinic and advances in this area should be facilitated by the recent development of a potent water-soluble CB(1)/CB(2) receptor agonist. A growing number of strategies for separating sought-after therapeutic effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists from the unwanted consequences of CB(1) receptor activation are now emerging and these are discussed at the end of this review.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid receptor systems: therapeutic targets for tumour intervention.

The past decade has witnessed a rapid expansion of our understanding of the biological roles of cannabinoids and their cognate receptors. It is now certain that Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the principle psychoactive component of the Cannabis sativa plant, binds and activates membrane receptors of the 7-transmembrane domain, G-protein-coupled superfamily. Several putative endocannabinoids have since been identified, including anandamide, 2-arachidonyl glycerol and noladin ether. Synthesis of numerous cannabinomimetics has also greatly expanded the repertoire of cannabinoid receptor ligands with the pharmacodynamic properties of agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists. Collectively, these ligands have proven to be powerful tools both for the molecular characterisation of cannabinoid receptors and the delineation of their intrinsic signalling pathways. Much of our understanding of the signalling mechanisms activated by cannabinoids is derived from studies of receptors expressed by tumour cells; hence, this review provides a succinct summary of the molecular pharmacology of cannabinoid receptors and their roles in tumour cell biology. Moreover, there is now a genuine expectation that the manipulation of cannabinoid receptor systems may have therapeutic potential for a diverse range of human diseases. Thus, this review also summarises the demonstrated antitumour actions of cannabinoids and indicates possible avenues for the future development of cannabinoids as antitumour agents.

Animals↗

Glycine receptors in CNS neurons as a target for nonretrograde action of cannabinoids.

At many central synapses, endocannabinoids released by postsynaptic cells act retrogradely on presynaptic G-protein-coupled cannabinoid receptors to inhibit neurotransmitter release. Here, we demonstrate that cannabinoids may directly affect the functioning of inhibitory glycine receptor (GlyR) channels. In isolated hippocampal pyramidal and Purkinje cerebellar neurons, endogenous cannabinoids anandamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol, applied at physiological concentrations, inhibited the amplitude and altered the kinetics of rise time, desensitization, and deactivation of the glycine-activated current (I(Gly)) in a concentration-dependent manner. These effects of cannabinoids were observed in the presence of cannabinoid CB1/CB3, vanilloid receptor 1 antagonists, and the G-protein inhibitor GDPbetaS, suggesting a direct action of cannabinoids on GlyRs. The effect of cannabinoids on I(Gly) desensitization was strongly voltage dependent. We also demonstrate that, in the presence of a GABA(A) receptor antagonist, GlyRs may contribute to the generation of seizure-like activity induced by short bursts (seven stimuli) of high-frequency stimulation of inputs to hippocampal CA1 region, because this activity was diminished by selective GlyR antagonists (strychnine and ginkgolides B and J). The GlyR-mediated rhythmic activity was also reduced by cannabinoids (anandamide) in the presence of a CB1 receptor antagonist. These results suggest that the direct inhibition of GlyRs by endocannabinoids can modulate the hippocampal network activity.

Animals↗

[Cardiovascular effects of cannabinoids].

The psychoactive properties of cannabinoids, the biologically active constituents of the marijuana plant, have long been recognized. Recent research has revealed that cannabinoids elicit not only neurobehavioral, and immunological, but also profound cardiovascular effects. Similar effects can be elicited by the endogenous ligand arachidonyl ethanolamine (anandamide) and 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol. The biological effects of cannabinoids are mediated by specific receptors. Two cannabinoid receptors have been identified so far: CB1-receptors are expressed by different cells of the brain and in peripheral tissues, while CB2-receptors were found almost exclusively in immune cells. Through the use of a selective CB1 receptor antagonist and CB1 receptor-knockout mice the hypotensive and bradycardic effects of cannabinoids in rodents could be attributed to activation of peripheral CB1 receptors. In hemodynamic studies using the radioactive microsphere technique in anesthetized rats, cannabinoids were found to be potent CB1-receptor dependent vasodilators in the coronary and cerebrovascular beds. Recent findings implicate the endogenous cannabinoid system in the pathomechanism of haemorrhagic, endotoxic and cardiogenic shock. Finally, there is evidence that the extreme mesenteric vasodilation, portal hypertension and systemic hypotension present in advanced liver cirrhosis are also mediated by the endocannabinoid system. These exciting, recent research developments indicate that the endogenous cannabinoid system plays an important role in cardiovascular regulation, and pharmacological manipulation of this system may offer novel therapeutic approaches in a variety of pathological conditions.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid withdrawal is dependent upon PKA activation in the cerebellum.

Region-specific up-regulation of the cyclic AMP pathway is considered an important molecular mechanism in the origin of the somatic manifestations of the withdrawal syndrome to known drugs of abuse. Nevertheless, the existence of a withdrawal syndrome after prolonged cannabinoid administration has long been a controversial issue. Recent studies, in different species, have shown that withdrawal to prolonged cannabinoid exposure precipitated by the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A is characterized by physical signs underlying impairment of motor coordination. Interestingly, cannabinoid withdrawal is accompanied by an increase of adenylyl cyclase activity in the cerebellum. Here, we investigate the functional role of the cyclic AMP pathway in the cerebellum in the establishment of cannabinoid withdrawal. We show that after SR141716A precipitation of cannabinoid withdrawal, basal and calcium-calmodulin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities as well as active PKA in the cerebellum increase in a transient manner with a temporal profile which matches that of the somatic expression of abstinence. Selectively blocking the up-regulation of the cyclic AMP pathway in the cerebellum, by microinfusing the cyclic AMP blocker Rp-8Br-cAMPS in this region, markedly reduced both PKA activation and the somatic expression of cannabinoid withdrawal. Our results (i) directly link the behavioural manifestations of cannabinoid withdrawal with the up-regulation of the cyclic AMP pathway in the cerebellum, pointing towards common molecular adaptive mechanisms for dependence and withdrawal to most drugs of abuse; (ii) suggest a particular role for the cerebellum as a major neurobiological substrate for cannabinoid withdrawal.

8-Bromo Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Psychoactive cannabinoids increase mortality and alter acute phase cytokine responses in mice sublethally infected with Legionella pneumophila.

Marijuana contains both psychoactive and nonpsychoactive cannabinoids which have varying effects on the immune response system. Previous studies with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the major psychoactive component of marijuana, showed that this substance augmented the susceptibility of mice to infection with the opportunistic pathogen Legionella pneumophila. The present study compared the enhancement of Legionella-induced mortality in mice due to two other major of marijuana components, cannabinol and cannabidiol, as well as the synthetic psychoactive cannabinoid CP 55,940. Inbred BALB/c mice, relatively resistant to infection with Legionella, were given the marijuana component 1 day before and 1 day after a sublethal intravenous infection with Legionella. Unlike the effect of THC, an 8 mg/kg dose of either cannabinol or cannabidiol did not affect mortality of the mice sublethally infected with Legionella. Mice given a 16 mg/kg dose of these components of marijuana, however, showed a slight to moderately increased mortality following the sublethal infection with Legionella. In contrast, a dose of 6 mg/kg of the synthetic psychoactive cannabinoid CP 55,940 given 1 day before and 1 day after infection with Legionella resulted in about 50% of the animals dying, the same level of augmentation of lethality induced by THC. Liver, spleen, and lung tissues were removed from the surviving mice 24 hr after the second THC injection and tested for the presence of viable Legionella using a standard CFU assay. The mice injected with THC before and after infection showed significantly higher levels of bacteria in their lung than mice that were not given any cannabinoid but were infected sublethally with the Legionella. Mice injected with the other cannabinoids, including the synthetic cannabinoid, showed a much smaller increase in the number of Legionella in their lung when infected with Legionella and treated with the drug. The number of bacteria recovered from the kidney and liver of the mice regardless of treatment with a cannabinoid, including with THC, did not show significant changes. RNA isolated from the spleen of the THC- and Legionella-treated animals was examined to determine at the molecular level whether acute phase pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-1, IL-6 and TNF-alpha) were altered following drug treatment and infection, since previous studies had shown there were increased serum levels of these cytokines in the mice. It was found that the mRNA levels for IL-1 remained generally constant regardless of whether the infected animals were treated with a cannabinoid. However, the mRNA level for IL-6 was markedly increased following treatment of the infected animals with THC, suggesting the possible involvement of this pro-inflammatory cytokine in increased mortality. The mRNA level for TNF-alpha was generally low and not significantly altered in the drug treated animals. Mice given other cannabinoids, including cannabinol and cannabidiol, as well as the synthetic CP 55,940, showed no significant change in the level of mRNA for any of the cytokines tested.

Acute-Phase Proteins↗

Role of CB1 and CB2 receptors in the inhibitory effects of cannabinoids on lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide release in astrocyte cultures.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the central cannabinoid receptor (CB(1)) in mediating the actions of the endogenous cannabinoid agonist anandamide and the synthetic cannabinoid CP-55940. Activation of primary mouse astrocyte cultures by exposure to bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) caused a marked (approximately tenfold) increase in nitric oxide (NO) release. Coincubation with the cannabinoid agonists anandamide or CP-55940 markedly inhibited release of NO (-12% to -55%). This effect was abolished by SR-141716A (1 microM), a CB1 receptor antagonist. SR-141716A alone also significantly increased NO release in response to LPS, suggesting that endogenous cannabinoids modify inflammatory responses. In contrast, coincubation with the CB2 receptor antagonist SR-144528 (1 microM) abolished the inhibitory effects of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide on LPS-induced NO release, although this may reflect nonspecific effects of this ligand or cannabinoid actions through atypical receptors of anandamide. We also showed that endogenous or synthetic cannabinoids inhibit LPS-induced inducible NO synthase expression (mRNA and protein) in astrocyte cultures. These results indicate that CB1 receptors may promote antiinflammatory responses in astrocytes.

Analgesics↗

Analysis of the effect of cannabinoids on GABAergic neurotransmission in the substantia nigra pars reticulata.

The CB(1) cannabinoid receptor is widely distributed in the central nervous system. The substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) belongs to the brain regions with the highest density of CB(1) receptors. According to anatomical studies, most of the CB(1) receptors in the SNR are localized on terminals of striatonigral GABAergic neurons. The aim of the present study was to clarify the function of these receptors.Electrophysiological properties of SNR neurons were studied in brain slices with the patch-clamp technique. Inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) were elicited in parasagittal slices by electrical stimulation in the internal capsule. The mixed CB(1)/CB(2) cannabinoid receptor agonist WIN55212-2 (1 microM and 10 microM) concentration dependently decreased the amplitude of IPSCs. CP55940, another mixed CB(1)/CB(2) cannabinoid receptor agonist, also lowered IPSC amplitude. Superfused alone, the CB(1)-selective antagonist SR141716A (1 microM) increased the amplitude of IPSCs. In interaction experiments, SR141716A (1 microM) prevented the inhibition produced by WIN55212-2 (1 microM). WIN55212-2 (1 microM) had no effect on GABAergic currents elicited by ejection of muscimol (1 mM) to the surface of the slices. WIN55212-2 (10 microM) did not influence the frequency and amplitude of spontaneously occurring IPSCs (sIPSCs) and the firing rate of SNR neurons. The results show that activation of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors inhibits GABAergic neurotransmission in the SNR. The likely mechanism is presynaptic inhibition of GABA release, since cannabinoids had no effects on currents evoked by direct stimulation of GABA(A) receptors by muscimol and on the amplitude of sIPSCs. The enhancement of IPSCs by the cannabinoid antagonist probably reflects continuous inhibition of GABAergic neurotransmission by an endogenous cannabinoid. SNR neurons receive GABAergic input from three sources: from the corpus striatum, the globus pallidus and from neighbouring SNR neurons. The observed inhibition of GABAergic neurotransmission was probably due to depression of the transmission between striatonigral axons and SNR neurons. No direct actions of cannabinoids on SNR neurons were observed in addition to this synaptic effect.

Animals↗

Cannabinoid modulation of the reinforcing and motivational properties of heroin and heroin-associated cues in rats.

RATIONALE: Recently, we provided evidence for a cannabinoid mechanism in relapse to cocaine seeking in rats. There is also increasing evidence for functional cross-talk between cannabinoid and opioid systems in several physiological processes. OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate whether the cannabinoid system plays a role in mediating the reinforcing and motivational effects of heroin and heroin-paired stimuli. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were trained to self-administer heroin (50 microg/kg per infusion) on fixed (FR5) or progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement in the presence of a discriminative and discrete heroin-associated cue. The selective cannabinoid CB1 antagonist SR141716A was given 30 min before the session to determine its effect on responding for heroin. Separate groups of rats were subjected to extinction training during which heroin-associated cues were absent and no heroin was delivered. During subsequent reinstatement tests, the effects of the cannabinoid agonist HU210 and the antagonist SR141716A on reinstatement of heroin seeking were evaluated. RESULTS: The cannabinoid antagonist dose-dependently reduced responding for heroin on the FR5 schedule and to a greater extent on the progressive ratio schedule. HU210 (20 microg/kg) reinstated heroin seeking behaviour following a 2-week extinction period, whereas SR141716A dose-dependently attenuated heroin seeking that was provoked by a priming injection of heroin (0.25 mg/kg) and heroin seeking that was triggered by re-exposure to heroin paired stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the reinforcing and motivational effects of heroin and heroin-paired stimuli are mediated, at least in part, by activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Therefore, the present study provides a rationale for the use of cannabinoid antagonists in the treatment of opiate addiction.

Animals↗

Identification of cannabinoid receptors in cultures of rat cerebellar granule cells.

G protein-linked cannabinoid receptors are present in high density in cerebellum, where they inhibit adenylyl cyclase. This study explored whether cannabinoid receptors are co-localized with GABAB receptors on cerebellar granule cells. In rat cerebellar membranes, receptor-coupled G protein function was assayed by agonist stimulation of low Km GTPase as well as agonist-inhibited adenylyl cyclase. Addition of cannabinoid agonists together with the GABAB agonist, baclofen, produced additive responses with stimulation of low Km GTPase but only partially additive responses with inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. In Weaver and Staggerer but not Nervous mutant mice, cannabinoid-inhibited adenylyl cyclase was significantly decreased in cerebellar but not striatal membranes compared to littermate controls. In primary cultures of rat cerebellar granule cells, cannabinoids inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels, with IC50 values ranging from 0.1 to 2.0 microM. Cannabinoid inhibition of intracellular cAMP levels was blocked by pretreatment of cell cultures with pertussis toxin. Addition of baclofen and cannabinoid agonists together in cultured granule cells produced no additivity in response for inhibition of intracellular cAMP levels. These data confirm that G protein-linked cannabinoid receptors are present in cerebellar granule cells and may share adenylyl cyclase catalytic units with GABAB receptors.

Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose↗