PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Denture, Partial, Fixed”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

An in vitro study of dentin exposure during resin-bonded fixed partial denture preparation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate whether dentin is exposed during tooth preparation for resin-bonded fixed partial dentures and, if so, to quantify the amount of dentin exposure. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Twenty extracted premolars were prepared in the following manner: The palatolingual and proximal axial surfaces were reduced by 0.50 mm. Mesial and distal grooves, 1.00 mm in depth, and mesial and distal occlusal rest seats, measuring 2.00 mm buccolingually x 1.50 mm mesiodistally x 1.00 mm deep, were prepared. The specimens were stained with a modified van Gieson's stain to identify dentin exposure, mounted on a jig to allow standardization, and photographed after 30-degree rotation to create a panoramic image of each tooth. The image was modified and analyzed to measure the percentage of the preparation area that exhibited dentin exposure. RESULTS: Dentin exposure was noted in all specimens. The mean area of dentin exposure was 11.06 mm2 (16.15% of the preparation area). The minimum and maximum areas of dentin exposure were 4.07 mm2 (7.03%) and 19.73 mm2 (27.28%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Dentin is exposed during resin-bonded fixed partial denture preparation if current tooth preparation guidelines are followed, despite the commonly made recommendation that the preparation remain within enamel. The region of the grooves consistently exhibited exposed dentin; exposure at the cervical margin was variable.

Bicuspid↗
PubMed2002

Treatment of a juvenile patient with a maxillary all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial denture: a case report.

Treatment of juvenile patients with a missing maxillary incisor is difficult, because an implant cannot be placed until growth is completed. The other minimally invasive alternatives are also problematic: Removable dentures are rarely accepted by juvenile patients, and the conventional resin-bonded fixed partial denture often provides a poor esthetic result because the metal retainer causes the abutment teeth to lose their natural translucency and to become grayish. Moreover, the alveolar ridge defect makes it easy to identify the prosthesis in the pontic area. The present case report describes the prosthetic treatment of a juvenile patient who had lost a maxillary incisor to trauma. To avoid the disadvantages of conventional therapies, subepithelial connective tissue was grafted to reshape the alveolar ridge. The space was closed with an all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial denture.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Fixed partial dentures: all-ceramics, fibre-reinforced composites and experimental systems.

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the fracture strength of three-unit FPDs (fixed partial dentures) and three-unit inlay FPDs after a simulated 5-year oral wearing period. The restorations were made of a pressable all-ceramic (Empress 2) and two specially designed, experimentally fixed partial dentures combining ceramics with dental composite. Three-unit FPDs and inlay FPDs were manufactured and were adhesively luted onto human molars. After thermal cycling and mechanical loading in an artificial environment, the fracture strength was determined. Zircon-based milled ceramic (Lava) three-unit FPDs were used as a control. The zircon ceramic and the fibre-based ceramic three-unit FPDs showed median fracture values between 1000 and 1400 N. For composite veneered zircon FPDs a fracture strength of about 800 N and for all-ceramic Empress 2 of about 350 N could be determined. The results for the inlay FPDs were between 1300 N and 1400 N for FRC/ceramic, 1000 N for zircon/composite and 500 N for all-ceramic restorations. The all-ceramic showed higher fracture resistance applied as inlay FPDs. The described hybrid techniques combining ceramics and composites could represent an interesting procedure for further investigations and, eventually, clinical implication.

Aluminum Silicates↗
PubMed2004

A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years.

The present study was done to determine the long-term success and survival of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) and to evaluate the risks for failures due to specific biological and technical complications. A MEDLINE search (PubMed) from 1966 up to March 2004 was conducted, as well as hand searching of bibliographies from relevant articles. Nineteen studies from an initial yield of 3658 titles were finally selected and data were extracted independently by three reviewers. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies with a mean follow-up time of at least 5 years in which patients had been examined clinically at the follow-up visits were included in the meta-analysis. Publications only based on patients records, questionnaires or interviews were excluded. Survival of the FPDs was analyzed according to in situ and intact failure risks. Specific biological and technical complications such as caries, loss of vitality and periodontal disease recurrence as well as loss of retention, loss of vitality, tooth and material fractures were also analyzed. The 10-year probability of survival for fixed partial dentures was 89.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 81-93.8%) while the probability of success was 71.1% (95% CI: 47.7-85.2%). The 10-year risk for caries and periodontitis leading to FPD loss was 2.6% and 0.7%, respectively. The 10-year risk for loss of retention was 6.4%, for abutment fracture 2.1% and for material fractures 3.2%.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2004

Survival rates of resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures with a mean follow-up of 42 months: a pilot study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although short-term clinical data exist for resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures (FPDs), long-term data are needed. PURPOSE: The survival rates of 29 resin-bonded, glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures were evaluated in this clinical study for periods of up to 42 months. MATERIAL AND METHODS: FPDs were fabricated to replace 1 to 3 missing maxillary or mandibular teeth of 29 patients not able to be treated with conventional FPDs. Originally, there were 37 patients (the drop-out rate was 22%). The FPDs were retained with wings, inlays, complete coverage crowns, or combinations of these that were bonded to tooth structure. The FPD frameworks were made of continuous unidirectional E-glass fibers with a multiphase polymer matrix and light-polymerized particulate composite veneer. The patients were recalled for examinations, where a general dental examination was performed, 1 to 3 times per year for up to 63 months (minimum 24 months, mean 42 months). Partial or complete total debonding of the FPD or the framework fracture was considered a treatment failure. The data were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier survival test (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Two resin frameworks fractured, and 3 frameworks were debonded. Kaplan-Meier survival probability at 63 months was 75%. Three of the failed FPDs were rebonded or repaired in situ, producing a functional survival rate of 93% after rebonding or repairing (mean survival time was 55 months). CONCLUSION: The results of this clinical study of 29 prostheses suggest that glass fiber-reinforced FPDs may be a possible alternative to cast metal resin-bonded FPDs. These restorations were successfully used as multiple-unit prostheses that employed a variety of abutment tooth preparation designs.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1990

[Analysis of stresses in modified resin-bonded cast fixed partial dentures].

In 1973, ROCHETTE introduced a periodontal splinting method that involved bonding of cast perforated retainers to the acid etched lingual surfaces of anterior teeth, using a resin. Nowadays, there have been a number of reports on the clinical performance of the adhesive bridges. The objective of this investigation was to photoelastically evaluate the forces exerted on the supporting structures of abutment teeth by modified resin-bonded cast fixed partial dentures. Four modified designs were tested and a traditional fixed bridge used as a control design. This study indicated that the resin bonded cast fixed partial denture with the lingual chamfer margin and mesial rest was the design to be chosen.

Dental Abutments↗
PubMed2001

Marginal adaptation of inlay-retained adhesive fixed partial dentures after mechanical and thermal stress: an in vitro study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There are no studies that analyze the long-term durability of minimally invasive fixed partial dentures (FPDs) by comparing different methods of adhesive bonding. PURPOSE: This in vitro study examined the influence of cavity design and operative technique on the marginal adaptation of resin-bonded composite FPDs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Slot-inlay tooth preparations with cavity margins located in enamel were prepared in 18 maxillary canines and 18 maxillary first molars designated as abutments. The specimens were divided equally into 3 experimental groups. In all groups, butt joint tooth preparations were created in canines and molars. In group 2, canines were prepared additionally with a 1.5-mm wide palatal bevel in enamel. After pretests with modification spaces of 11 and 17 mm (length), 2 missing premolars were replaced by the ceromer Targis and reinforced with the glass-fiber material Vectris. The prostheses were inserted with Tetric Ceram with use of an ultrasonic-supported, high-viscosity technique. Restorations were selectively bonded to cavity finish lines in groups 1 and 2 ("selective bonding"). In group 3, restorations were bonded totally to the whole cavity surface ("total bonding"). The restorations were stressed in a computer-controlled masticator. Marginal quality was examined with an SEM at x 200. RESULTS: The percent area of optimal margins after thermomechanical loading between composite and enamel in each group was as follows: group 1, 86.2% +/- 12.3% for canines and 95.5% +/- 3.5% for molars; group 2, 95.3% +/- 2.1% for canines and 96.2% +/- 2.7% for molars; and group 3, 95% +/- 0.9% for canines and 86.4% +/- 3.2% for molars. The marginal quality for molars inserted with total bonding was significantly lower (P< or =.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the selective bonding technique for slot inlay-retained fixed partial dentures resulted in a negligible loss of marginal quality after extensive mechanical and thermal stress. The selective bonding technique is recommended for box-shaped cavity preparations.

Acid Etching, Dental↗
PubMed2005

Use of abutment-teeth vs. dental implants to support all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: an in-vitro study on fracture strength.

The aim of the present in-vitro study was to compare the fracture strength of all-ceramic Fixed Partial Dentures supported by tooth-analogues and periodontal membrane with the same supported by dental implants. As ceramics are highly brittle, they cannot withstand deformations of more than 0.1% without fracturing. Hence, when planning an all-ceramic FPD, it is essential to evaluate abutment support, as the fracture strength of all-ceramic constructions depends on the stability of the support to reduce strain in the beam of the prosthesis. The support provided by implants differs, however, from the support provided by natural teeth as the implants are anchored directly in the bone with no intermediate tissue. One question that arises is whether strain and stress in the prosthesis are lower when the prosthesis is loaded on implants compared to natural teeth and hence if all-ceramic FPDs benefit from implant support. Twenty-four three-unit all-ceramic FPDs-12 supported by two dental implants and 12 by two tooth-analogues serving as end abutments-were made. All FPDs were subjected to preloading in a preloading procedure and subsequently subjected to load until fracture occurred. Load at fracture were registered and comparisons between the two groups were made. The loads at fracture were statistically significant higher in the group supported by implants compared to the group supported by tooth-analogues (p = 0.003). Within the limitations of this in-vitro study, the following conclusions can be drawn: All-ceramic fixed partial dentures can be used in combination with dental implants. The solid support gained from implants might thus be beneficial for the outcome of such treatment due to decreased strain and stress levels in the prosthesis when loaded on implants compared to when loaded on natural teeth. Clinical studies are, however, needed to confirm these findings as there are more factors that influence the final clinical outcome.

Dental Abutments↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A systematic review of the scientific documentation of fixed partial dentures made from fiber-reinforced polymer to replace missing teeth.

PURPOSE: Many restorative systems have become commercially available that are based on fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) for production of fixed partial dentures. However, the clinical documentation of their use has not been systematically reviewed and critically appraised. This systematic review aimed to identify the scientific documentation of all commercially available products within this material group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE was searched for all clinical and laboratory studies on FRP, and papers were browsed to identify product names. Moreover, the Internet was searched to find manufacturers of FRP products. Also, several large trade exhibitions were visited to identify products and manufacturers. All papers that included any data from a clinical setting of an identifiable product were critically appraised. Each product was categorized according to the scientific clinical documentation of their intended clinical use. RESULTS: Eleven commercial products were identified. The scientific clinical documentation of these products varied markedly, but was generally poor. No randomized controlled trials have been carried out on FRPs versus, eg, conventional treatments, nor are any long-term cohort studies available. None of the products demonstrate good evidence for usage as a technical solution to permanently replace lost teeth. CONCLUSION: The use of FRP for fixed partial dentures must still be regarded as experimental.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1997

Cantilever fixed partial denture--a literature review.

In light of the increasing demand for fixed prosthetics by today's patients, the author felt the time was right for a review of an area of fixed prosthetics that is neither well understood nor well accepted. The cantilever fixed partial denture (FPD) requires more time to treatment plan and place than other comparable fixed prosthetics. However, if the necessary criteria are met, the final results can be very rewarding for the practitioner and the patient from both an esthetic and a functional standpoint. This article discusses various factors that impact on the practitioner's ability to place a cantilever FPD with the expectation of long-term success, as well as other related areas of treatment planning.

Bite Force↗
PubMed2005

Use of an alternative pontic foundation technique for a fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial denture: a clinical report.

This article describes the treatment of a patient for whom a fiber-composite laminate dowel and core and polyethylene fiber were used as a conservative alternative to provide a dowel-and-core and fixed partial denture foundation. The treatment plan included removing the existing restoration on the maxillary right first molar, placing a fiber-reinforced resin dowel and core for retention and reinforcement of the maxillary first premolar, and fabricating a definitive restoration using polyethylene fiber to reinforce the fixed partial denture.

Acrylic Resins↗
PubMed1996

A new design for all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures.

After 7 years of clinical experience, the alumina ceramic, In-Ceram, can be regarded as a well-proven material for all-ceramic crowns. Because of its high strength, this material can also be used for small all-ceramic fixed partial dentures. First attempts at using this material for resin-bonded prostheses revealed a high failure rate. The aim of this article is to present a new preparation design for all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures that allows fabrication of highly esthetic and also tooth-saving adhesive prostheses. Clinical results over a period of 4 years revealed that they are strong enough to replace anterior teeth. Nevertheless, positive long-term clinical results are necessary before a general recommendation can be given for this kind of prosthesis.

Aluminum Oxide↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Immediate loading of implants with 3-unit fixed partial dentures: a 12-month clinical study.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present clinical trial was to evaluate the 12-month success rate of titanium dental implants placed in the posterior mandible and immediately loaded with 3-unit fixed partial dentures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with missing mandibular premolars and molars were enrolled in this study. To be included in the study, the implants had to show good primary stability. Implant stability was measured with resonance frequency analysis using the Osstell device (Integration Diagnostics). Implants were included in the study when the stability quotient (ISQ) exceeded 62. Clinical measurements, such as width of keratinized tissue, ISQ, and radiographic assessment of peri-implant bone crest levels, were performed at baseline and at the 12-month follow-up. The comparison between the baseline and the 12-month visits was performed with the Student t test for paired data (statistically significant at a level of alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Forty implants with a sandblasted, large grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface (Straumann) were placed in 20 patients. At 12 months, only 1 implant had been lost because of an acute infection. The remaining 39 implants were successful, resulting in a 1-year success rate of 97.5%. Neither peri-implant bone levels, measured radiographically, nor implant stability changed significantly from baseline to the 12-month follow-up (P > .05). DISCUSSION: The immediate functional loading of implants placed in this case series study resulted in a satisfactory success rate. CONCLUSION: The findings from this clinical study showed that the placement of SLA transmucosal implants in the mandibular area and their immediate loading with 3-unit fixed partial dentures may be a safe and successful procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

Reactive force distributions for teeth when loaded singly and when used as fixed partial denture abutments.

1. A finite element model was devised to examine mechanical responses of the periodontium to loads applied to the model in vertical, oblique, and horizontal directions for an individual tooth having varied alveolar levels, splinted teeth, and a cantilever type of fixed partial denture. 2. Forces applied to the teeth are balanced by stresses generated within the periodontal membrane and alveolar bone. 3. It was substantiated that the teeth were evolved to carry axial types of loads, since stresses on the periodontium were smaller than those obtained for oblique or horizontal types of loads. Axial types of loads produce compressive stresses on the periodontium; oblique or horizontal types of loads produce zones of compressive and tensile stresses. 4. Mechanically, splinting teeth is a desirable procedure. 5. A cantilever type of fixed partial denture should have at least two abutments. It should not be used to replace more than one tooth.

Alveolar Process↗
PubMed1998

In vitro study of fracture strength and marginal adaptation of fibre-reinforced-composite versus all ceramic fixed partial dentures.

In this in vitro study fracture strength and marginal adaptation of adhesive-fixed three-unit posterior fixed partial dentures made with two different fabrication modifications--with and without the retainer material "Single"--of the new fibreglass system Vectris/Targis and from the metal-free Al2O3-ceramic In-Ceram were examined. The quality of the marginal adaptation was characterised using SEM evaluation and dye penetration techniques. In-Ceram and Vectris/Targis with "Single" showed good marginal adaptation, both statistically significantly better than the modification without "Single". After thermal cycling and mechanical loading the fibreglass reinforced systems showed a significantly higher fracture strength than the In-Ceram.

Aluminum Oxide↗
PubMed1990

[Fixed partial denture on osseointegrated screw implants].

There are many differences between full dentures on Brånemark implants and fixed partial dentures built on the same type of implants: due to some more critical anatomical conditions, the choice of number, position and length of the implants is more delicate; the need of an harmonious crown-gingival tissue relationship; higher occlusal forces than in edentalous cases; difficulty in satisfying aesthetic requirements and ease of hygiene. The surgical treatment plan, a pre-requesite to any surgery, permits to determine the length of implants, their number, their position, their long axis direction and the design of the surgical guide, which will indicate to the surgeon the location and the axis for drilling. If this axis is nearly parallel to the sagittal plane for mandibular implants, it will be angulated to that same plane for maxillary implants. In the latter cases, it is often necessary to use angulated transepithelial abutments in order to prevent the abutment screw from having an occlusal access. In order to perform the prosthetis, an impression should be taken with the transepithelial abutments. The final reconstruction can be preceded by a temporary prosthesis, then (or) transitory to await gingival stabilization and not overload the implant immediately after it has been connected with the abutment. The fixed partial denture can be secured with screws or cemented when it is of small size and it must satisfy the functional and aesthetic requirements of the patient. The choice of the material used on the occlusal surface is very important and varies depending on the case. Aesthetics should not be prevent an in easy hygiene. These objectives are not reached at the time the prosthesis is made but during the course of the surgical and prosthetic treatment. Single restorations are subjected to the rules pertaining to any fixed partial denture on implants, but have particular characteristics, such as the almost systematic elimination of the abutment and the absolute necessity of the correct placement of the implant. The single units are more easily subject to unscrewing for mechanical reasons. Although the use of implants is a valuable aid in cases of partial fixed restoration, it requires particular attention with regard to precision.

Dental Implantation, Endosseous↗
PubMed1991

A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures.

This study compared the marginal fit of complete-arch fixed prostheses under simulated clinical conditions. Prostheses were made on casts constructed from three commonly used impression materials; polyether, polyvinyl siloxane (medium-viscosity and putty-wash), and reversible hydrocolloid. A maxillary dentoform with four abutment teeth was used as the master cast and six impressions were made with each material. Individual castings for each abutment were made on the stone casts. The abutment castings were luted together on the casts to provide a complete-arch fixed partial denture using a ticonium framework and acrylic resin. The marginal fit of the abutment castings was measured on the master cast before and after the prostheses were luted together. The polyether and both addition silicone impression materials were significantly more accurate than the reversible hydrocolloid in both situations. All of the single castings were clinically acceptable, but the luted restorations made from reversible hydrocolloids were not.

Analysis of Variance↗