[Immunostimulation].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Drug alergy is always a risk in Therapeutics. Penicillin allergy although less frequent than usually though, is very important because sometimes is life threatening. Penicillin allergy is an immunological phenomenon, it is possible to use in vitro and in vivo procedures able to demonstrate individual ability to develop allergical reaction, in particular to predict such severe reactions like anaphilaxis. This paper review current concepts regarding immune mechanisms for Penicillin allergy and immunological testing useful in its study.
In the group of 50 patients suffering from grass pollen allergy and successfully treated with SIT for three consecutive years, we observed in 5 persons after the end of this treatment the induction of allergy to new allergens (to weeds, mites or tree) manifested by the change of the symptoms season. The induction of the new kind of allergy was confirmed by revealing of the positive skin prick tests to new allergens and by an increase of the specific IgE serum level to them. Despite disappearance of the symptoms of the illness during grass pollen season in all 5 patients we noted the higher total IgE as well as specific to grasses IgE serum level, in comparison to the value at the start of SIT. In the paper the possible mechanisms of this phenomenon are discussed, which seems to be not connected with the natural development of allergy and which confirms once more that during SIT individual changes in humoral and cellular immunity of the patient take place, sometimes very difficult to be predicted. They may among others switch clinical profile of allergy, what indicates that patient during SIT should be under the careful immunological supervision.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Allergic diseases are common problems affecting 20% to 30% of the US population. Mast cells and basophils are the primary effector cells mediating allergic inflammation through the triggering of membrane immunoglobulin E receptors (FceRI) with antigen. Allergen immunotherapy is used as one treatment for allergic disease and results in the inhibition of mast cell and basophil responses through unknown mechanisms. In this review, we examine potential mechanisms that could result in blunted human mast cell/basophil functional responses, strategies aimed at using these mechanisms to develop new immunologically based therapies, and recent findings that have broad implications toward our understanding of how mast cells/basophils become desensitized.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Despite its clinical effectiveness, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains controversial because serious systemic reactions can occur during its administration. Most of the studies on the safety of AIT are retrospective and use different methods, which frequently depart from daily clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine risk factors for adverse reactions, especially systemic adverse reactions, produced during routine AIT administration. METHODS: We registered 5,768 consecutive doses of standardized extracts administered to 273 patients in conventional schedules, following the recommendations on safety and data collection of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology. Of the 273 patients, 236 were asthmatics, 28 had rhinitis and 9 received immunotherapy due to Hymenoptera anaphylaxis. RESULTS: We examined 143 local reactions (2.48 % of the doses) and 145 systemic reactions (78 immediate and 67 delayed). Risk factors for developing an immediate systemic reaction were asthma severity, sensitization to molds, the most concentrated vials and a fall in peak expiratory flow of more than 15 % or an immediate systemic reaction in the previous dose. Late systemic reactions were significantly more frequent with less concentrated vials and in patients with late local reactions in the previous dose. No serious reactions were registered. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that AIT is reliable when used with strict safety protocols and administered by specialized staff. Risk factors for adverse reactions to this type of treatment can be identified and reduced by systematic data collection.
BACKGROUND: Allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) leads to long-term amelioration of T-helper type 2 (Th2)-mediated allergic symptoms and is therefore recommended as a first line therapy for allergies. The major disadvantage of SIT is its low efficiency, requiring treatment over years. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we evaluated the potential of Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands to facilitate Th1-type immune responses. METHODS: The immunogenicity and therapeutic potential of the major bee venom allergen phospholipase A2 (PLA2) combined with various TLR ligands were tested in mice and compared with immune responses induced by conventional aluminium-based preparations. RESULTS: Regarding total IgG against PLA2, TLR2/4-binding lipopolysaccharide and TLR3-binding polyriboinosinic polyribocytidylic (PolyI:C) were the superior adjuvants for prophylactic vaccination. However, TLR9-binding phosphorothioate-modified cytosine-guanosine-rich oligonucleotide (CpG), TLR-3-binding PolyI:C, and TLR2/6-binding peptidoglycan skewed the immune responses more towards IgG2a isotype and Th1 cytokines. Furthermore, in a therapeutic approach, CpG, PolyI:C and TLR7/8-binding 3M003 had immune modulating properties as they suppressed established IgE titres. CONCLUSION: The potential of TLR ligands to adjuvate the immunogenicity of bee venom PLA2 and to skew the Th1-Th2 balance proved very heterogeneous. With respect to SIT, CpG, PolyI:C, and 3M003 were very promising. Hence, TLR ligands should be considered as adjuvants or immune modulators in SIT in human as to improve its efficiency regarding the Th1-Th2 balance of the immune response with a likely effect on therapy duration.