SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Dissection”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

PubMed1994

Recurrent spontaneous cervical-artery dissection.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous dissection of the internal carotid and vertebral arteries is increasingly recognized as a cause of ischemic stroke in young people. An underlying arteriopathy is often suspected in the pathogenesis of such dissection, but the frequency of recurrent dissection is unknown. METHODS: We describe the long-term follow-up of 200 consecutive patients (104 women and 96 men) with spontaneous cervical-artery dissections evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1970 and 1990. All diagnoses were confirmed by angiography. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 44.9 years (range, 16 to 76). Internal carotid arteries were affected in 150 patients, vertebral arteries in 37, and both in 13. Multivessel dissections were present in 28 percent of the patients. The mean follow-up was 7.4 years. Recurrent dissection occurred only in arteries not previously involved by dissection. A recurrent arterial dissection developed in 16 patients (8 percent)--within a month after the initial dissection in 4 patients (2 percent) and between 1.4 and 8.6 years later in 12 patients (a rate of 1 percent per year). The cumulative rate of recurrent dissection among patients followed for 10 years was 11.9 percent. Younger patients had a greater risk of recurrent dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Although dissections in multiple cervical vessels are common at presentation, after the first month the risk of recurrent dissection is only about 1 percent per year.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Aorta and aortic valve morphologies predisposing to aortic dissection. An in vivo assessment with transoesophageal echocardiography.

Predisposing factors for aortic dissection are well known from necropsy series. To evaluate the frequency of aortic and aortic valve disease in aortic dissection in vivo, 139 patients with acute aortic dissection (96 men, 43 women, mean age 60.5 +/- 15.7 years) were studied by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) using 3.5 and 5.0 MHz transducers. Left ventricular hypertrophy by TEE, defined as an end-diastolic wall thickness of the left ventricular septal wall over 1.5 cm, was found in 42 (67.7%) of 62 patients with type I, in 10 (58.8%) of 17 patients with type II and in 46 (76.7%) of 60 patients with type III dissection. The mean value for the aortic root diameter was 3.2 +/- 1.3 cm.m-2 in type I dissection and 2.8 +/- 0.9 cm.m-2(ns) in type II dissection. In the patient group with type III dissection this diameter was significantly smaller (1.8 +/- 0.9 cm.m-2; P < 0.001). Thickening of aortic valve leaflets was demonstrated in six (9.7%) of 62 patients with aortic dissection type I (two of them with mild aortic stenosis), in two (11.8%) of 17 patients with aortic dissection type II and in 15 (25.0%) of 60 patients with aortic dissection type III. A bicuspid aortic valve was diagnosed in five (6.3%) of 79 patients with aortic dissection types I and II and in one (1.7%) of 60 patients with type III dissection. By colour coded Doppler echocardiography, aortic regurgitation was found in 46 (74.2%) of 62 patients with type I, 13 (76.5%) of 17 patients with type II and 23 (38.3%) of 60 patients with type III dissection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Planned neck dissection after concomitant radiochemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Since 1998, at our academic, multidisciplinary head and neck cancer treatment center, it has been our policy to treat appropriate patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with concomitant radiochemotherapy followed within 6 weeks by planned neck dissection(s). Our objective was to investigate the oncologic efficacy of planned neck dissection, to date, in this patient population with a focus on outcomes in the neck. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a cumulative patient database. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent planned neck dissection(s) after concomitant radiochemotherapy for locoregionally advanced SCCHN at Beth Israel Medical Center and The Institute for Head and Neck Cancer in New York City were reviewed. For each patient, preradiochemotherapy primary and neck stage, postradiochemotherapy/preneck dissection clinical and radiographic neck status, type of neck dissection(s) performed, pathologic status of the neck dissection specimen(s), length of follow-up (after planned neck dissection), disease status at last follow-up, and site(s) of recurrence were recorded. Local, regional, and distant disease control rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Fifty-one planned neck dissections were performed on 39 radiochemotherapy patients (12 patients had bilateral operations) between early 1998 and October, 2003. Thirty-two (82%) patients had N2 or greater neck disease, with 29 (74%) having T3/T4 disease at various upper aerodigestive tract primary sites. Patients received an average of 6,700 cGy and 6,000 cGy external beam radiation therapy to primary disease sites and involved cervical lymphatics respectively, concomitant with one of three platinum-based chemotherapy schedules. At a mean follow-up time of 24 (range 8-57) months for the entire study population, there has been only one neck recurrence (N2A neck). No patient with N2B (n = 11), N2C (n = 13, with majority of heminecks staged N2B), or N3 (n = 5) disease has recurred in the neck. No recurrences have occurred in the 41 heminecks (in 33 patients) where modified neck dissection (including 24 selective procedures) was performed despite the presence of residual carcinoma in 13 (32%) of these heminecks on pathologic review. Among all heminecks with residual carcinoma present (n = 18) in the neck dissection specimen, there has been only one neck recurrence. There have been no recurrences in the 26 heminecks (in 19 patients) with incomplete clinical response after radiochemotherapy despite the presence of residual carcinoma in 14 (54%) of these necks on pathologic review. The clinical and radiographic absence of residual disease after radiochemotherapy did not always predict a complete pathologic response. Surgical complications have been limited (1 chyle leak, 1 wound breakdown). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of planned neck dissection into the multidisciplinary management of patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN is highly effective in controlling cervical metastatic disease. Modified and selective neck dissection procedures can be performed in the majority of patients, regardless of the response in the neck subsequent to concomitant radiochemotherapy. We recommend a planned neck dissection(s) in all patients staged (pretreatment) with N2 or greater neck disease and in select N1 cases.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed1987

Detection of aortic dissection by transoesophageal echocardiography.

The diagnostic value of a combination of transoesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography was evaluated in 21 patients with dissection of the aorta. The results were compared with those of computed tomography, aortography, and with findings at operation or necropsy or both. Transthoracic echocardiography identified three of the four patients with type I dissection, two of the five patients with type II dissection, and one of the 12 patients with type III dissection. When transoesophageal echocardiography was used as well the degree of aortic dissection was identified correctly in all 21 patients. In one patient with type I and in eight patients with type III dissection spontaneous echocardiographic contrast with a mural thrombus within the false lumen could be detected. Computed tomography was unable to demonstrate an intimal flap in one of two patients studied with type I dissection, in two of three patients with type II dissection, and in one of nine patients with type III dissection. Aortography was negative in one of two patients studied with type I dissection, two of four patients with type II dissection, and in one of eight patients with type II dissection. The whole thoracic aorta can be imaged by a combination of transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography. The addition of transoesophageal echocardiography to transthoracic echocardiography improves the recognition of aortic dissection. Furthermore, this examination can be performed at the bedside and the findings can be used as a basis for treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Extracranial and intracranial vertebrobasilar dissections: diagnosis and prognosis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnosis and prognosis of extracranial versus intracranial vertebral artery dissections without intracerebral haemorrhage. METHODS: Twenty two vertebral artery dissections were defined by intra-arterial angiography and classified in two groups: group 1, nine extracranial dissections (seven patients) and group 2, 13 intracranial dissections (nine patients), involving the basilar artery in five cases. Bilateral dissections were found in 38% of the population. Before angiography, all the patients had been investigated by continuous wave Doppler, colour coded Doppler, and transcranial Doppler. Mean follow up was 44 months. RESULTS: The two most important symptoms of both dissections (81% of patients) were unbearable pain preceding stroke and progressive onset of stroke within a few hours. Severe ultrasonic abnormalities were present in 94% of the patients whereas specific ultrasonic signs (segmental dilation with eccentric channel) were rare (19%) in both groups. Major strokes and brainstem strokes represented respectively 67% and 78% in intracranial versus 43% and 29% in extracranial dissections. Severe sequelae (permanent disabling motor or cerebellar deficit) were more often associated with intracranial (44%) than with extracranial dissections (14%). No recurrence of dissection and no cerebral haemorrhage were found under heparin. Significant factors of poor outcome (P< 0.05) were the initial severity of the stroke and the bilateral location of dissections. CONCLUSION: The combination of a pain and a progressive onset of the stroke, corroborated by ultrasonic findings, could have helped to recognise most of these types of dissections. Intracranial dissections have a poorer prognosis than extracranial dissections.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

QT interval changes following neck dissection. A stratified prospective study.

Studies from Europe have suggested that neck dissection, especially right radical neck dissection, causes a dangerous prolongation of the QT interval. Sudden cardiac arrest due to QT prolongation has been reported following right radical neck dissection. We investigated the prevalence of QT interval prolongation following neck dissection. Electrocardiogram tracings from 45 patients who underwent different combinations of neck dissection were studied. Preoperative and postoperative tracings were interpreted by a cardiologist blinded to the patient identification of each tracing. There were 28 unilateral neck dissection patients and 17 bilateral neck dissection patients eligible for analysis. There were 7 patients in the classic right radical neck dissection group, and only 3 of these had no neck dissection on the left. Comparisons of preoperative versus postoperative corrected QT interval for all subjects did not indicate a significant change. Stratification by neck dissection type (radical, modified or selective, and carotid artery resection) or by side dissected (left, right, or both) also showed no significant differences. No malignant arrhythmias were encountered. Thus, in contrast to the European experience, our findings show no significant predictable change in the QT interval after any of the combinations of neck dissection. Head and neck surgeons should be aware of the possibility of postoperative QT interval prolongation following neck dissection, although in the absence of other risk factors it appears to be a rare occurrence.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1983

[Surgery of recurrent aortic dissection. Apropos of 6 cases].

The authors report a series of 6 cases of recurrent dissection, 4 of which were treated surgically, out of a total of 64 acute dissections of the aorta referred to the CMC Foch, between January 1969 and October 1981. Three types of recurrent dissection were identified: --"de novo" recurrent dissection: a new dissection occurring in part of the aorta previously unaffected with a new intimal tear; --recurrent dissection due to extension of the previous dissection; --"in situ" recurrent dissection. Surgery is the treatment of choice because of the poor prognosis. Extensive resection (sometimes carried out in several stages) and deep hypothermia are valuable techniques when part of the aorta giving off arteries to vital organs has to be replaced. The use of GRF biological glue in the treatment of the original acute dissection has been a significant advance in the prophylaxis of recurrent dissection as it ensures better repair of the distal false lumen (27% persistent false lumens). With respect to an extensive replacement of the dissected vessel, the authors advise operation in several stages, especially in young subjects with Marfan's syndrome who are at high risk of recurrent dissection. All cases of acute dissection of the aorta, operated or not, should be followed up indefinitely with clinical and radiological examination, completed, when necessary, by an angioscan and an aortography.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Postoperative tonsillectomy pain in pediatric patients: electrocautery (hot) vs cold dissection and snare tonsillectomy--a randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the method of tonsillectomy on postoperative pain in pediatric patients. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: A university pediatric hospital in Aberdeen, Scotland. PATIENTS: A volunteer sample of 54 children, aged 3 to 12 years, with recurrent tonsillitis or symptomatic adenotonsillar hypertrophy. Two patients withdrew consent. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-six children underwent a nonelectrical (ie, cold) dissection tonsillectomy with cold steel instruments, 5 of whom also had adenoidectomy by curettage. Monopolar diathermy forceps were used for tonsillar bed hemostasis. Twenty-four children had electrocautery (ie, hot) dissection tonsillectomy, 7 of whom underwent adenoidectomy by curettage without a suction coagulator. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative analgesic consumption, time to regain normal diet and activity levels, and complications. RESULTS: Patients who underwent hot dissection tonsillectomy showed no difference in time to first drink or analgesic use within the first 24 postoperative hours compared with children undergoing cold nonelectrical dissection tonsillectomy. The hot dissection tonsillectomy group took 7.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1-14.1) more doses of analgesics than the cold dissection group over the next 12 days (P<.05). The hot dissection tonsillectomy group took 2.5 more days than the cold dissection tonsillectomy group to regain normal diet (P<.05). Thirteen children (54%; 95% CI, 34-74) in the hot dissection tonsillectomy group and 6 (23%; 95% CI, 7-39) in the cold dissection tonsillectomy group sought outpatient care for throat pain, otalgia, poor diet, pyrexia, and/or bleeding (P<.05). Throat pain delayed in onset or of prolonged duration affected 9 children (38%; 95% CI, 19-57) in the hot dissection tonsillectomy group as opposed to 3 children (12%; 95% CI, 0-24) in the cold dissection tonsillectomy group (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Hot dissection tonsillectomy increases morbidity in pediatric patients in the recovery period following hospital discharge.

Adenoidectomy↗

PubMed2002

Development and validation of the neck dissection impairment index: a quality of life measure.

OBJECTIVES: To validate a health-related quality-of-life (QOL) instrument for patients following neck dissection and to identify the factors that affect QOL following neck dissection. DESIGN: Cross-sectional validation study. SETTING: The outpatient clinic of a tertiary care cancer center. PATIENTS: Convenience sample of 54 patients previously treated for head and neck cancer who underwent a selective neck dissection or modified radical neck dissection (64 total neck dissections). Patients had a minimum postoperative convalescence of 11 months. Thirty-two underwent accessory nerve-sparing modified radical neck dissection, and 32 underwent selective neck dissection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A 10-item, self-report instrument, the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII), was developed and validated. Reliability was evaluated with test-retest correlation and internal consistency using the Cronbach alpha coefficient. Convergent validity was assessed using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Constant Shoulder Scale, a shoulder function test. Multiple variable regression was used to determine variables that most affected QOL following neck dissection RESULTS: The 10-item NDII test-retest correlation was 0.91 (P<.001) with an internal consistency Cronbach alpha coefficient of.95. The NDII correlated with the Constant Shoulder Scale (r = 0.85, P<.001) and with the SF-36 physical functioning (r = 0.50, P<.001) and role-physical functioning (r = 0.60, P<.001) domains. Using multiple variable regression, the variables that contributed most to QOL score were patient's age and weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type. CONCLUSIONS: The NDII is a valid, reliable instrument for assessing neck dissection impairment. Patient's age, weight, radiation treatment, and neck dissection type were important factors that affect QOL following neck dissection.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Randomized prospective evaluation of extended versus limited lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The low rate of pelvic node metastasis in most contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate has been attributed to earlier and better patient selection than historical series. Alternatively, it has been suggested that the limited dissection commonly performed misses nodal metastasis in a substantial number of patients. To assess the value of an extended node dissection in detecting nodal metastasis, we performed a randomized prospective study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 123 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were randomized to an extended node dissection on the right versus the left side of the pelvis with the other side being a limited dissection. The extended dissection included removal of all external iliac nodes to a point above the bifurcation of the common iliac artery, the obturator nodes and the presacral nodes. The limited dissection included only the nodes along the external iliac vein and obturator nerve. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 61 years. Clinical stage was T1c in 88 patients (72%), T2a in 26 (21%), T2b in 7 (6%) and T3 in 2 (1%). Mean preoperative prostate specific antigen was 7.4 ng./ml. Pelvic lymph node metastasis was histologically confirmed in 8 patients (6.5%). Positive nodes were found on the side of the extended dissection in 4 patients, on the side of the limited dissection in 3 and on both sides in 1. Complications possibly attributable to the node dissection included lymphocele in 4 patients, lower extremity edema in 5, deep venous thrombosis in 2, ureteral injury in 1 and pelvic abscess in 1. These complications occurred 3 times more often on the side of the extended dissection (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Extended node dissection in contemporary series of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy identifies few with nodal metastases not found by a more limited dissection. A trend toward an increased risk of complications attributable to the lymphadenectomy occurs with an extended dissection.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Safety of a paraaortic node dissection for selected advanced gastric cancer patients.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Comprehensive evaluations of a superextended (D3) dissection concerning its benefits as well as potential disadvantages have been scanty in the English literature. METHODOLOGY: The patient selection criteria for a D3 dissection were pre- and intraoperatively > or = T3 and/or > or = N2 diseases, no paraaortic node involvement, no distant or peritoneal metastases, and a negative peritoneal lavage cytology. A D3 dissection involved a node clearance up to the third tier including the middle paraaortic region. Twenty-seven patients were entered into our D3 dissection strategy in a prospective manner between 1997 and 2000, and were divided into 2 groups: pathologically meeting the D3 criteria (D3 criteria fit; 12 patients) and pathologically proved to have less advanced disease (less advanced/D3; 15 patients). Data from age-matched 53 patients who underwent a D2 dissection between 1991 and 1996 were collected and also divided according to the current D3 criteria. Surgical invasiveness, morbidity and mortality, nutritional parameters, and survival were compared between D2 and D3 patients. Additionally, positive paraaortic node patients with a D3 dissection (4 patients) were used for preliminary survival comparison. RESULTS: A D3 dissection resulted in longer surgery and more blood loss, but morbidity and mortality, and nutritional impairment were similar to those of a D2 dissection. A more promising survival rate by a D3 dissection over a D2 dissection was observed only in the D3 fit patients but not in the less advanced disease patients. On the contrary, survivals of the positive paraaortic node patients were pessimistic despite the R0 resection. CONCLUSIONS: A D3 dissection is an invasive procedure but can be performed as safely as a D2 dissection. Our results provide a starting point for a D3 challenge; however, paraaortic node positive patients should be excluded from a D3 dissection.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗

PubMed1997

[Spinal accessory nerve and lymphatic neck dissection].

Radical neck dissection was the golden standard of treatment for cervical nodes in head and neck tumors. From the seventies, the preservation of the spinal accessory nerve has become increasingly popular in order to improve the functional result of the neck dissections. The aim of this study was to assess the degree of functional disability associated with each type of neck dissection and the value of anatomical references for dissection of the spinal accessory nerve. One hundred twenty seven patients were evaluated 1 month and 1 year after radical, functional or supraomohyoid neck dissection with a questionnaire and a physical examination. Anatomical measurements of the spinal accessory nerve were performed in 20 patients. We found considerable or severe shoulder dysfunction in 7%, 34% and 51% respectively of patients in whom supraomohyoid, functional and radical neck dissections were performed. Furthermore 49% of patients having undergone a radical neck dissection had little or no symptoms. Sacrifice of the spinal accessory nerve in radical neck dissection may lead to shoulder dysfunction. A functional disability may also be associated, although in a less extent, with any neck dissection in which the spinal accessory nerve is dissected and placed in traction. There is a large variation in the degree of functional disability and pain in patients with similar neck dissections. The course of the spinal accessory nerve in the neck makes it particularly vulnerable to injury during the dissection near the sternocleidomastoid muscle and in the posterior cervical triangle.

Accessory Nerve↗

PubMed2000

Clinical prediction of acute aortic dissection.

BACKGROUND: Clinical criteria for aortic dissection are poorly defined. Thus, 35% of aortic dissections remain unsuspected in vivo, and 99% of suspected cases can be refuted. OBJECTIVE: To identify independent predictors of acute aortic dissection and create a prediction model for facilitated estimation of the individual risk of dissection. METHODS: Two hundred fifty patients with acute chest pain, back pain, or both; absence of an established differential diagnosis of the pain syndrome; and clinical suspicion of acute aortic dissection were evaluated for the presence of 26 clinical variables in a prospective, observational study. Multivariate analysis was performed to create a prediction model of aortic dissection. RESULTS: Aortic pain with immediate onset, a tearing or ripping character, or both; mediastinal widening, aortic widening, or both on chest radiography; and pulse differentials, blood pressure differentials, or both (P<.001 for all) were identified as independent predictors of acute aortic dissection. Probability of dissection was low with absence of all 3 variables (7%), intermediate with isolated findings of aortic pain or mediastinal widening (31% and 39%, respectively), and high with isolated pulse or blood pressure differentials or any combination of the 3 variables (> or = 83%). Accordingly, 4% of all dissections were assigned to the low-probability group, 19% to the intermediate-probability group, and 77% to the high-probability group of aortic dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of 3 clinical variables permitted identification of 96% of the acute aortic dissections and stratification into high-, intermediate-, and low-probability groupings of disease. With better selection for prompt diagnostic imaging, this prediction model can be used as an aid to improve patient care in aortic dissection. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2977-2982

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Selective vs modified radical neck dissection and postoperative radiotherapy vs observation in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the role of selective neck dissection in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oral tongue with advanced nodal disease, and to assess the role of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with SCC of the oral tongue with pathologically N1 necks. DESIGN: Retrospective study of the medical records of all patients who underwent neck dissection for SCC of the oral tongue from January 1, 1980, to December 31, 1995. Median follow-up was 5.7 years. SETTING: The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, a tertiary care cancer hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 220 patients with SCC of the oral tongue who received surgical treatment of both the primary tumor and the neck and who had an identifiable type of neck dissection, no synchronous or metachronous lesions, and no evidence of local recurrence. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent resection of the primary tumor and neck dissection. The extent of neck dissection was determined by surgeon preference. Some patients received radiotherapy to the neck as well. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and pathological nodal status, type of neck dissection, and use of radiotherapy. The end points evaluated included the regional control rates. RESULTS: For clinically N+ patients, 5 of 45 treated with selective neck dissection and 1 of 19 treated with radical or modified radical neck dissection had recurrences in the ipsilateral neck. If only patients with significant tumor burden on final pathological examination (clinically N+/pathologically N2) are considered, 4 (25.0%) of 16 patients undergoing selective neck dissection had recurrences in the neck, while none of the 14 patients treated with radical or modified radical neck dissection had recurrences in the ipsilateral neck (P = .07). Of the 50 patients who had pathologically N1 disease, 25 received postoperative radiotherapy and 25 did not. Of the latter, 2 had recurrences in the neck, while none of the 25 patients who received radiotherapy had recurrences in the neck (P = .24). CONCLUSIONS: Selective neck dissection may be sufficient for many N+ patients with SCC of the oral tongue, but some patients with extensive nodal disease may benefit from more aggressive treatment of the neck. Radiotherapy may be beneficial for all of the node-positive patients, but further studies are needed. Prospective, randomized clinical trials will be useful in further defining the role of selective neck dissection in the clinically N2 neck and radiotherapy in the N1 neck for patients with SCC of the oral tongue.

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell↗

PubMed2006

Examining the need for neck dissection in the era of chemoradiation therapy for advanced head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) determine clinical factors that predict pathologic complete response (pCR) on neck dissection after sequential chemoradiotherapy (SCRT) for advanced head and neck cancer and (2) compare survival parameters between those who underwent neck dissection and those who did not among those patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) in the neck after SCRT, thus assessing the benefit of neck dissection in patients with a cCR in the neck. DESIGN: Retrospective review with a mean follow-up of 3.5 years. SETTING: Regional cancer center. PATIENTS: The study population comprised 55 patients undergoing SCRT for advanced head and neck cancer with N2 or N3 neck disease. Three patients developed progressive disease and were excluded, and 28 patients underwent neck dissection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assessed by physical examination and radiographically after SCRT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical examination and radiographic assessments of residual neck disease were compared with pathologic findings in those patients who underwent neck dissection. Survival comparisons were made between patients with a cCR in the neck who underwent neck dissection and those who did not. RESULTS: Of 28 patients who underwent neck dissection, 8 had persistent pathologically positive nodal disease: 5 (45%) of 11 had N3 and 3 (18%) of 17 had N2 disease. Individual clinical neck assessments after SCRT were fairly predictive of a negative pathologic finding at neck dissection. The negative predictive values were physical examination (75%), computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging (71%), and positron emission tomography (75%). However, when physical examination, imaging studies, and positron emission tomography all indicated a complete response, this accurately predicted a pCR on neck dissection. There appeared to be no improvement in survival parameters when a neck dissection was performed on patients with a cCR in the neck. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with N3 disease are at high risk for residual neck metastasis after SCRT. Patients with N2 disease can be assessed with physical examination, imaging studies, and positron emission tomography. If these all indicate a cCR, then neck dissection is likely not needed. Neck dissection did not appear to further improve survival parameters for patients with a cCR in the neck.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Quality of life after neck dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of modifications to radical neck dissection on postoperative quality of life. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a self-administered neck dissection questionnaire and an arm abduction test. SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kobe University Hospital. PATIENTS: Seventy-four patients who had undergone neck dissection for the treatment of head and neck cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Arm abduction test results and responses to questions on quality of life related to neck dissection. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent bilateral neck dissections, and 33 patients underwent unilateral neck dissection. Level V nodes were dissected in 74 necks. Among them, the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) was resected in 29 necks. Patients who had neck dissections that spared the SAN had better shoulder function. When the SAN was preserved, patients without dissection of level IV and V nodes had better scores on measures of pain and constriction of the neck. Sacrifice of the sternocleidomastoid muscle and/or the SAN had a significant effect on daily activities, work, and leisure. The arm abduction test scores and answers to questions regarding shoulder function were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Modifications to radical neck dissection contribute to improvements in the postoperative quality of life after neck dissection. A multicenter study using the arm abduction test and questionnaire used in this study is currently in progress to further evaluate the impact of modifications to radical neck dissection on quality of life after surgery.

Accessory Nerve↗

PubMed1999

ILEAD--ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection: the isolated presentation.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Lower extremity symptoms accompanying dissecting hematomas of the aorta are well described. Isolated lower extremity ischemia as the presenting syndrome of aortic dissection is rare and frequently misinterpreted so that the diagnosis of aortic dissection is delayed or missed, often with catastrophic results. This study was undertaken to determine its common characteristics and to reinforce recognition of this life-threatening phenomenon. METHODS: After the first patient in our series presented with isolated lower extremity ischemia due to aortic dissection, a prospective search for similar presentations was undertaken over 2 years. We also conducted a retrospective search for all aortic dissections at our hospital for the past 10 years and a MEDLINE search for all reported aortic dissections in the literature of the past 20 years, as well as for all reports of isolated ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection. RESULTS: Three patients with isolated ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection were found prospectively after the index case. Over 10 years, 40 patients with acute aortic dissection were diagnosed at our hospital. The MEDLINE search revealed 1,751 aortic dissections of which 10% had lower extremity symptoms. Only 10 cases of aortic dissection were reported as lower extremity ischemia with symptoms isolated to one or both lower extremities. Smoking, hypertension, male gender, hypercholesterolemia, and recent history of coronary artery bypass grafting were common predisposing risk factors for this rare presentation. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic isolated ischemia of the lower extremities due to aortic dissection is rare and often missed. Awareness of its characteristics, aided by the acronym ILEAD, made it possible to suspect the true origin of this misleading syndrome.

Aortic Dissection↗

PubMed1986

The complementary role of magnetic resonance imaging, Doppler echocardiography, and computed tomography in the diagnosis of dissecting thoracic aneurysms.

Non-ECG gated MRI was compared with 2DE and/or CT scans in 10 patients with dissecting aneurysms proven by angiography and/or surgery. Patient ages ranged from 48 to 85 years (mean 69.6). Six had DeBakey type I dissections and four had DeBakey type III dissections. MRI was diagnostic for aortic dissection in nine cases and suggestive in the tenth. 2DE was diagnostic in six out of nine patients, suggestive in two patients, and nondiagnostic in one patient. CT was diagnostic in the three cases in which it was employed. MRI demonstrated a dilated ascending aorta with thickened walls in all type I dissections as well as an intimal flap and slow flow in the false channel in four patients. In the other two patients with type I dissection, MRI detected the intimal flap in the descending aorta but not in the ascending aorta, whereas 2DE revealed the ascending aortic intimal flap in both of these patients and CT showed it in one of them. In the type III dissections, MRI demonstrated a thickened wall and thrombus in the lumen in all four cases, and the intimal flap in three out of the four. 2DE excluded ascending aortic involvement in all three type III dissections. Six other patients with fusiform dilated ascending aortas had no evidence of dissection by MRI, 2DE, and aortography. Thus, non-ECG gated MRI alone or in combination with 2DE and/or CT is useful in the diagnosis of dissecting thoracic aneurysm and in assessing the extent of the dissection. In addition, the differentiation of dissecting aneurysms of the aorta from fusiform dilatation of the aorta is made possible by these noninvasive techniques.

Aged↗