PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Manipulation, Spinal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

Risk factors and precipitating neck movements causing vertebrobasilar artery dissection after cervical trauma and spinal manipulation.

STUDY DESIGN: Potential precipitating events and risk factors for vertebrobasilar artery dissection were reviewed in an analysis of the English language literature published before 1993. OBJECTIVES: To assess the literature pertaining to precipitating neck movements and risk factors for vertebrobasilar artery dissection in an attempt to determine whether the incidence of these complications can be minimized. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebrobasilar artery dissection and occlusion leading to brain stem and cerebellar ischemia and infarction are rare but often devastating complications of cervical, manipulation and neck trauma. Although various investigators have suggested potential risk factors and precipitating events, the basis for these suggestions remains unclear. METHODS: A detailed search of the literature using three computerized bibliographic databases was performed to identify English language articles from 1966 to 1993. Literature before 1966 was identified through a hand search of Index Medicus. References of articles obtained by database search were reviewed to identify additional relevant articles. Data presented in all articles meeting the inclusion criteria were summarized. RESULTS: The 367 case reports included in this study describe 160 cases of spontaneous onset, 115 cases of onset after spinal manipulation, 58 cases associated with trivial trauma, and 37 cases caused by major trauma (3 cases were classified in two categories). The nature of the precipitating trauma, neck movement, or type of manipulation that was performed was poorly defined in the literature, and it was not possible to identify a specific neck movement or trauma that would be considered the offending activity in the majority of cases. There were 208 (57%) men and 158 (43%) women (gender data not reported in one case) with an average age of 39.3 +/- 12.9 years. There was an overall prevalence of 13.4% hypertension, 6.5% migraines, 18% use of oral contraception (percent of female patients), and 4.9% smoking. In only isolated cases was specific vascular disease such as fibromuscular hyperplasia noted. CONCLUSIONS: The literature does not assist in the identification of the offending mechanical trauma, neck movement, or type of manipulation precipitating vertebrobasilar artery dissection or the identification of the patient at risk. Thus, given the current status of the literature, it is impossible to advise patients or physicians about how to avoid vertebrobasilar artery dissection when considering cervical manipulation or about specific sports or exercises that result in neck movement or trauma.

Aortic Dissection↗

Three-dimensional vertebral motions produced by mechanical force spinal manipulation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the 3-dimensional intersegmental motion responses produced by 3 commonly used chiropractic adjusting instruments. METHODS: Six adolescent Merino sheep were examined at the Institute for Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, Australia. In all animals, triaxial accelerometers were attached to intraosseous pins rigidly fixed to the L1 and L2 spinous processes under fluoroscopic guidance. Three handheld mechanical force chiropractic adjusting instruments (Chiropractic Adjusting Tool [CAT], Activator Adjusting Instrument IV [Activator IV], and the Impulse Adjusting Instrument [Impulse]) were used to randomly apply posteroanterior (PA) spinal manipulative thrusts to the spinous process of T12. Three force settings (low, medium, and high) and a fourth setting (Activator IV only) were applied in a randomized repeated measures design. Acceleration responses in adjacent segments (L1 and L2) were recorded at 5 kHz. The multiaxial intersegmental (L1-L2) acceleration and displacement response at each force setting was computed and compared among the 3 devices using a repeated measures analysis of variance (alpha = .05). RESULTS: For all devices, intersegmental motion responses were greatest for axial, followed by PA and medial-lateral (ML) measurement axes for the data examined. Displacements ranged from 0.11 mm (ML axis, Activator IV low setting) to 1.76 mm (PA axis, Impulse high setting). Compared with the mechanical (spring) adjusting instruments (CAT, Activator IV), the electromechanical Impulse produced the most linear increase in both force and intersegmental motion response and resulted in the greatest acceleration and displacement responses (high setting). Significantly larger magnitude intersegmental motion responses were observed for Activator IV vs CAT at the medium and high settings (P < .05). Significantly larger-magnitude PA intersegmental acceleration and displacement responses were consistently observed for Impulse compared with Activator IV and CAT for the high force setting (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Larger-magnitude, 3D intersegmental displacement and acceleration responses were observed for spinal manipulative thrusts delivered with Impulse at most force settings and always at the high force setting. Our results indicate that the force-time characteristics of impulsive-type adjusting instruments significantly affects spinal motion and suggests that instruments can and should be tuned to provide optimal force delivery.

Acceleration↗

Improvement of lower extremity electrodiagnostic findings following a trial of spinal manipulation and motion-based therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar disc herniation is a problem frequently encountered in manual medicine. While manual therapy has shown reasonable success in symptomatic management of these cases, little information is known how manual therapy may affect the structure and function of the lumbar disc itself. In cases where lumbar disc herniation is accompanied by radicular symptoms, electrodiagnostic testing has been used to provide objective clinical information on nerve function. This report examines the treatment rendered for a patient with lower extremity neurological deficit, as diagnosed on electrodiagnostic testing. Patient was treated using spinal manipulation and exercises performed on a Pettibon Wobble Chair, using electrodiagnostic testing as the primary outcome assessment. CASE PRESENTATION: An elderly male patient presented to a private spine clinic with right-sided foot drop. He had been prescribed an ankle-foot orthosis for this condition. All sensory, motor, and reflex findings in the right leg and foot were absent. This was validated on prior electromyography and nerve conduction velocity testing, performed by a board certified neurologist. Patient was treated using spinal manipulation twice-weekly and wobble chair exercises three times daily for 90 days total. Following this treatment, the patient was referred for follow-up electrodiagnostic studies. Significant improvements were made in these studies as well as self-rated daily function. CONCLUSION: Motion-based therapies, as part of a comprehensive rehabilitation program, may contribute to the restoration of daily function and the reversal of neurological insult as detected by electrodiagnostic testing. Electrodiagnostic testing may be a useful clinical tool to evaluate the progress of chiropractic patients with lumbar disc herniation and radicular pain syndromes.

Journal Article↗

Spinal manipulation reduces pain and hyperalgesia after lumbar intervertebral foramen inflammation in the rat.

OBJECTIVE: To document potential mediating effects of the Activator-assisted spinal manipulative therapy (ASMT) on pain and hyperalgesia after acute intervertebral foramen (IVF) inflammation. METHODS: The IVF inflammation was mimicked by in vivo delivery of inflammatory soup directly into the L5 IVF in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats. Thermal hyperalgesia and mechanical allodynia were determined by the shortened latency of foot withdrawal to radiant heat and von Frey filament stimulation to the hind paw, respectively. Intracellular recordings were obtained in vitro from L5 dorsal root ganglion (DRG) somata. DRG inflammation was examined by observation of the appearance and hematoxylin and eosin staining. ASMT was applied to the spinous process of L4, L5, and L6. A series of 10 adjustments were initiated 24 hours after surgery and subsequently applied daily for 7 consecutive days and every other day during the second week. RESULTS: (1) ASMT applied on L5, L6, or L5 and L6 spinous process significantly reduced the severity and duration of thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia produced by the IVF inflammation. However, ASMT applied on L4 did not affect the response in rats with IVF inflammation or the controls; (2) electrophysiological studies showed that hyperexcitability of the DRG neurons produced by IVF inflammation was significantly reduced by ASMT; (3) pathological studies showed that manifestations of the DRG inflammation, such as the increased vascularization and satellitosis, were significantly reduced 2 to 3 weeks after ASMT. CONCLUSIONS: These studies show that ASMT can significantly reduce the severity and shorten the duration of pain and hyperalgesia caused by lumbar IVF inflammation. This effect may result from ASMT-induced faster elimination of the inflammation and recovery of excitability of the inflamed DRG neurons by improving blood and nutrition supplement to the DRG within the affected IVF. Manipulation of a specific spinal segment may play an important role in optimizing recovery from lesions involving IVF inflammation.

Animals↗

Chiropractic manipulation in the treatment of acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion: a randomized double-blind clinical trial of active and simulated spinal manipulations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Acute back pain and sciatica are major sources of disability. Many medical interventions are available, including manipulations, with conflicting results. PURPOSE: To assess the short- and long-term effects of spinal manipulations on acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Randomized double-blind trial comparing active and simulated manipulations in rehabilitation medical centers in Rome and suburbs. PATIENT SAMPLE: 102 ambulatory patients with at least moderate pain on a visual analog scale for local pain (VAS1) and/or radiating pain (VAS2). OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain-free patients at end of treatment; treatment failure (proportion of patients stopping the assigned treatment for lack of effect on pain); number of days with no, mild, moderate, or severe pain; quality of life; number of days on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; number of drug prescriptions; VAS1 and VAS2 scores; quality of life and psychosocial findings; and reduction of disc protrusion on magnetic resonance imaging. METHODS: Manipulations or simulated manipulations were done 5 days per week by experienced chiropractors, with a number of sessions which depended on pain relief or up to a maximum of 20, using a rapid thrust technique. Patients were assessed at admission and at 15, 30, 45, 90, and 180 days. At each visit, all indicators of pain relief were used. RESULTS: A total of 64 men and 38 women aged 19-63 years were randomized to manipulations (53) or simulated manipulations (49). Manipulations appeared more effective on the basis of the percentage of pain-free cases (local pain 28 vs. 6%; p<.005; radiating pain 55 vs. 20%; p<.0001), number of days with pain (23.6 vs. 27.4; p<.005), and number of days with moderate or severe pain (13.9 vs. 17.9; p<.05). Patients receiving manipulations had lower mean VAS1 (p<.0001) and VAS2 scores (p<.001). A significant interaction was found between therapeutic arm and time. There were no significant differences in quality of life and psychosocial scores. There were only two treatment failures (manipulation 1; simulated manipulation 1) and no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Active manipulations have more effect than simulated manipulations on pain relief for acute back pain and sciatica with disc protrusion.

Acute Disease↗

A risk/benefit analysis of spinal manipulation therapy for relief of lumbar or cervical pain.

Approximately 12 million Americans undergo spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) every year. Renewed interest in this method requires an analysis of its reported risks and possible benefits. This review describes two patients with spinal cord injuries associated with SMT and establishes the risk/benefit ratios for patients with lumbar or cervical pain. The first case is a man who underwent SMT for recurrent sciatica 4 years after chemonucleolysis. During therapy, he developed bilateral sciatica with urinary hesitancy. After self-referral, myelography demonstrated a total block; he underwent urgent discectomy with an excellent result 3 months after surgery. The second patient with an indwelling Broviac catheter and a history of lumbar osteomyelitis underwent SMT for neck pain. Therapy continued for 3 weeks despite the development of severe quadriparesis. After self-referral, he underwent an urgent anterior cervical decompression and removal of necrotic bone and an epidural abscess with partial neurological recovery. An analysis of these cases and 138 cases reported in the literature demonstrates six risk factors associated with complications of SMT. These include misdiagnosis, failure to recognize the onset or progression of neurological signs or symptoms, improper technique, SMT performed in the presence of a coagulation disorder or herniated nucleus pulposus, and manipulation of the cervical spine. Clinical trials of SMT have been summarized in several recent articles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

Equations of motion for the "Flopping Doctor" model of spinal manipulative therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To rigorously develop the physics and mathematics of the model of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) consisting of a damped linear oscillator representing the vertebra impacted by a spring system representing the doctor, to interpret the results and to compare and contrast them with an earlier similar study originally developed in approximation. DESIGN: Mathematical physics analysis. RESULTS: Careful consideration of the exact equations and their meaning leads one to eliminate as unnecessary the picture of the doctor as a spring system, replacing it with the force function, which represents the applied SMT thrust as a function of time. Thus, with correct application of the principles of physics to the original model, one is led directly to a linear harmonic oscillator model for the vertebral system, with a forcing function for the SMT thrust and possible preload. The details of the application of such a model are developed elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: The distraction resultant from an SMT thrust is shown to be a function of the momentum transfer, not, as asserted by the originator of the model, the velocity. The quickness of the application of the SMT thrust must be measured relative to normal mode frequencies of the spine. Further detailed examination of the physics of the model leads one to modify or contradict several other conclusions of the model's originator. Most importantly, the fact that the details of the physics of this model can be worked out analytically (as opposed to having to employ numerical methods) holds out the promise of additional insights to be gained by further development of this approach.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

High loading rate during spinal manipulation produces unique facet joint capsule strain patterns compared with axial rotations.

PURPOSE: Lumbar spinal manipulation (SM) is a popular, effective treatment for low back pain but the physiological mechanisms remain elusive. During SM, mechanoreceptors innervating the facet joint capsule (FJC) may receive a novel stimulus, contributing to the neurophysiological benefits of SM. The biomechanics of SM and physiological axial rotations were compared to determine whether speed or loading site affected FJC strain magnitudes or patterns. METHODS: Human lumbar spine specimens were tested during physiological rotations and simulated SM while measuring applied torque, vertebral motion, and FJC strain. During physiological rotations, specimens were actuated at T12 to 20 degrees left and right axial rotation at 2 degrees to 125 degrees per second. During SM simulations, a 7-mm impulse displacement was applied to L3, L4, or L5 at 5 to 50 mm per second. RESULTS: Physiological rotations. Increasing displacement rate resulted in significantly larger torque magnitudes (P < .001), whereas vertebral kinematics and FJC strain magnitudes were unchanged (P > .05). Physiological rotations vs SM. Applied torque and vertebral rotation magnitudes were similar across speed and vertebral level. Total vertebral translations were slightly larger during physiological rotations vs SM at a given loading rate (P < .05). Patterns of vertebral motions and FJC strain during SM and physiological rotations varied significantly with loading rate (P < .05) but not with actuation site (P > .15). CONCLUSIONS: The similar patterns observed in vertebral motion and FJC strain across actuation sites during SM and physiological rotations suggest that site specificity of SM may have minimal clinical relevance. High loading rates during lumbar SM resulted in unique patterns in FJC strain, which may result in unique patterns of FJC mechanoreceptor response.

Aged↗

A comparison of the effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain patients with and without spondylolisthesis.

The effectiveness of spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain is compared between two groups of patients: a small group (25) of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and a larger group (260) of patients without spondylolisthesis. This data, which was collected from a previously published study on the effectiveness of manipulation for chronic low back pain, shows that the results of manipulative treatment are not significantly different in those patients with or without lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Adolescent↗

A randomized controlled trial of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of cervicogenic headache.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the isolated intervention of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation in the cervical spine has any effect on cervicogenic headache. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with a blind observer. SETTING: Ambulatory outpatient facility in an independent NHS-funded chiropractic research institution. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-nine subjects suffering from frequent headaches who fulfilled the IHS criteria for cervicogenic headache (excluding radiological criteria). These subjects were recruited from among some 400 headache sufferers who responded to newspaper advertisements. INTERVENTION: Half of the group received high-velocity, low-amplitude cervical manipulation twice/wk for 3 wk. The other half received low-level laser in the upper cervical region and deep friction massage (including trigger points) in the lower cervical/upper thoracic region, also twice/wk for 3 wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The change from week 2 to week 6 in analgesics use per day, headache intensity per episode and number of headache hr per day. RESULTS: Despite a significant reduction in the manipulation group on all three outcome measures, differences between the two treatment groups failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The results suggest a possible effect of manipulation on cervicogenic headache, but because of methodological problems, such an effect could not be unequivocally demonstrated.

Adult↗

The assessment of cervical intersegmental mobility before and after spinal manipulative therapy.

The objective of this study is to assess the changes in cervical intersegmental spinal mobility before and after the use of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Two systems of mensuration are utilized in 58 case studies. The results are then compared to previously defined normal values and the efficacy of SMT is objectively assessed. Of the 58 case studies presented, results reveal that post-SMT mobility is significantly (p less than .05) greater than the pre-SMT data, with exception of the C1 segment of both the male and female treatment groups utilizing the Henderson et al. mensuration method. Although both systems displayed improved post-SMT scores, one system appeared to be a more sensitive form of mensuration, while the other is more inclusive, not depending on radiographic findings alone.

Adult↗

The effects of spinal manipulation on cervical kinesthesia in patients with chronic neck pain: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether spinal manipulation as an isolated intervention has any effect on proprioception-dependent performance of subjects with chronic neck pain, compared with effects achieved through stretching exercises. DESIGN: Matched, nonrandomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Private chiropractic clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty subjects with chronic (daily, > or = 4 months) neck pain. Volunteers were recruited from a pool of patients visiting the clinic or from those referred by informed clinicians. INTERVENTION: Half of the subjects received six sessions of high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation to the cervical and upper thoracic regions during a 3-4 wk period. The other half were instructed in stretching exercises for the cervicothoracic muscles, to be performed in two unsupervised sessions daily over the same time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain levels were assessed at baseline and at each of six follow-up sessions using a 100-mm visual analogue scale. The abilities of the blindfolded subjects to reproduce a neutral head position after moving the head and neck through various planes of motion was the method used to estimate proprioceptive acuity. This was done with the use of a laser pointer affixed to the top of an adjustable cap. Points were marked and measured on a target before and after head movement and repositioning. RESULTS: Subjects receiving manipulation demonstrated a mean reduction in visual analogue scores of 44%, along with a 41% improvement in mean scores for the head repositioning skill. In comparison, a 9% mean reduction in visual analogue scores and a 12% improvement in head repositioning scores was observed for the stretching group. The difference in the outcomes of the head repositioning skill scores was significant (p < or = .05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest a possible effect of manipulation on proprioception in subjects with chronic neck pain. The small sample size, lack of true randomization and lack of blinding of the examiner are factors that weaken these findings. Larger, more controlled studies are needed to determine what specific effects manipulation may have on the function of proprioception.

Adult↗

Oscillations of the vertebrae in spinal manipulative therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the general nature of the biomechanical response of the vertebrae to small forces, such as spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). DESIGN: Perturbation theoretical methods of physics and mechanical energy considerations are used to derive the equations of motion of the vertebral bodies moving under the combined influences of ligamentous and discogenic forces, applied forces and dissipative forces attributable to surrounding tissues. RESULTS: The allowable solutions to the equations of motion determine that the mechanical response of any vertebra to SMT should consist of a superposition of damped oscillations. This is based on the most general assumptions about the spine that are consistent with clinical observations, namely, that patients can lie stably motionless, and is independent of the specifics of any spinal model. DISCUSSION: The extant data are shown to be consistent with this theory. The implications for future research and clinical practice are explored. CONCLUSIONS: Vertebral motion in response to SMT seems to occur in two distinct phases: an initial, (passive) oscillatory response to the SMT thrust, governed by ligamentous and discogenic forces, and a later, less regular motion, probably caused by muscular reflex contractions. Evidence of this includes direct measurement of oscillations, surface electromyogram measurements of muscle responses and detection of multiple spinal resonances. Further research on the muscular reflex responses to SMT is necessary. Most SMT should initiate some of the normal-mode oscillations of the vertebrae. There may be up to 144 different frequencies of vertebral oscillatory motion in each individual in any posture; those frequencies detected thus far are consistent with the predicted relationship between frequencies, vertebral body masses and coefficients of stiffness. Further data are needed to confirm the detailed validity of this theory.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Chronic pediatric asthma and chiropractic spinal manipulation: a prospective clinical series and randomized clinical pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: The first objective was to determine if chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) in addition to optimal medical management resulted in clinically important changes in asthma-related outcomes in children. The second objective was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale, randomized clinical trial in terms of recruitment, evaluation, treatment, and ability to deliver a sham SMT procedure. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical case series combined with an observer-blinded, pilot randomized clinical trial with a 1-year follow-up period. SETTING: Primary contact, college outpatient clinic, and a pediatric hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 36 patients aged 6 to 17 years with mild and moderate persistent asthma were admitted to the study. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulmonary function tests; patient- and parent- or guardian-rated asthma-specific quality of life, asthma severity, and improvement; am and pm peak expiratory flow rates; and diary-based day and nighttime symptoms. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty chiropractic treatment sessions were scheduled during the 3-month intervention phase. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either active SMT or sham SMT in addition to their standardized ongoing medical management. RESULTS: It is possible to blind the participants to the nature of the SMT intervention, and a full-scale trial with the described design is feasible to conduct. At the end of the 12-week intervention phase, objective lung function tests and patient-rated day and nighttime symptoms based on diary recordings showed little or no change. Of the patient-rated measures, a reduction of approximately 20% in beta(2) bronchodilator use was seen (P =.10). The quality of life scores improved by 10% to 28% (P <.01), with the activity scale showing the most change. Asthma severity ratings showed a reduction of 39% (P <.001), and there was an overall improvement rating corresponding to 50% to 75%. The pulmonologist-rated improvement was small. Similarly, the improvements in parent- or guardian-rated outcomes were mostly small and not statistically significant. The changes in patient-rated severity and the improvement rating remained unchanged at 12-month posttreatment follow-up as assessed by a brief postal questionnaire. CONCLUSION: After 3 months of combining chiropractic SMT with optimal medical management for pediatric asthma, the children rated their quality of life substantially higher and their asthma severity substantially lower. These improvements were maintained at the 1-year follow-up assessment. There were no important changes in lung function or hyperresponsiveness at any time. The observed improvements are unlikely as a result of the specific effects of chiropractic SMT alone, but other aspects of the clinical encounter that should not be dismissed readily. Further research is needed to assess which components of the chiropractic encounter are responsible for important improvements in patient-oriented outcomes so that they may be incorporated into the care of all patients with asthma.

Adolescent↗

Intracranial hypotension following chiropractic spinal manipulation.

We report a case of intracranial hypotension caused by chiropractic manipulation which, in contrast to previously reported cases, documents the location of the cerebrospinal fluid leak by radionuclide cisternography. Cervical spinal manipulation produced a remote lumbar dural tear in our patient. Spinal magnetic resonance imaging may falsely localize the dural tear in this condition. Although conservative management is often sufficient, precise localization is required for more invasive therapies.

Adult↗

Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a single spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) on the in vitro production of inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin (IL) 1beta, in relation to the systemic (in vivo) levels of neurotransmitter substance P (SP). METHODS: Sixty-four asymptomatic subjects were assigned to SMT, sham manipulation, or venipuncture control group. SMT subjects received a single adjustment in the thoracic spine. Blood and serum samples were obtained from subjects before and then at 20 minutes and 2 hours after intervention. Whole-blood cultures were activated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 24 hours. Cytokine production in culture supernatants and serum SP levels were assessed by specific immunoassays. RESULTS: Over the study period, a significant proportion (P </= .05) of sham and control subjects demonstrated progressive increases in the synthesis of tumor necrosis factor alpha and IL-1beta. Conversely, in a comparable proportion of cultures from SMT-derived subjects, the production of both cytokines decreased gradually. Normalization of the observed alterations to reflect the changes relative to self-baselines demonstrated that, within 2 hours after intervention, the production of both cytokines increased significantly (P < .001 to .05) in both controls. In contrast, a significant (P < .001 to .05) reduction of proinflammatory cytokine secretion was observed in cultures from SMT-receiving subjects. In all study groups, serum levels of SP remained unaltered within 2 hours after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: SMT-treated subjects show a time-dependent attenuation of LPS-induced production of the inflammatory cytokines unrelated to systemic levels of SP. This suggests SMT-related down-regulation of inflammatory-type responses via a central yet unknown mechanism.

Adult↗

Psychological factors in the treatment of back pain by spinal manipulation.

Ninety patients with low back pain completed a short form of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and, subsequently, received spinal manipulative therapy. Most (84%) of the patients reported immediate relief following manipulation but the extent of that relief was not correlated with any psychological measure. However, several days after treatment, the percentage of patients reporting improvement was much lower (55%) and lack of improvement was associated with elevated scores on hypochondriasis (Hs), and functional low back pain (Lb). Unimproved patients also tended to report longer durations of back pain prior to treatment. Multiple regression analyses indicated that pain duration and the psychological factors were independent predictors of the response to treatment. It is suggested that, although a single manipulative treatment will often relieve the immediate cause of back pain, underlying psychosomatic factors may predispose the condition to recur.

Adult↗

Arterial tonometry and assessment of cardiovascular alterations with chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To (a) introduce arterial tonometry, which may offer a greater opportunity to detect alterations of the cardiovascular system with spinal manipulative therapy, (b) discuss the limitations of standard blood pressure measurements and (c) discuss factors that govern the contour of arterial pressure pulses. DATA SOURCES: Information was obtained from peer-reviewed medical and chiropractic journal articles and medical textbooks written in English (mainly from 1980 to 1995). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial tonometry is a noninvasive method to continuously measure the contour of arterial pressure pulses. Pulses can be simultaneously measured from several arterial sites because vessel occlusion is not required. Arterial tonometry supplements standard blood pressure measurements that measure only the systolic and diastolic pressures by permitting the investigation of additional parameters of cardiovascular functions. Changes in large artery function can be inferred through alterations of pulse contour, wave velocity and harmonic transmission ratios. Analysis of the beat-to-beat fluctuations of arterial pressure and heart rate can be used to determine whether SMT alters the autonomic nervous system. Reductions of arterial pressure in central vessels may not be apparent from standard blood pressure measurements at peripheral vessels. The contour of a pressure pulse depends on the magnitude and timing between incident and reflected pressure waves from the upper and lower body, body shape and size, the duration and pattern of ventricular systole, and dispersion and attenuation. Therefore, arterial tonometry may improve the ability to detect alterations of the cardiovascular system in chiropractic research.

Arteries↗