Local recurrence and rectal cancer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Estrogen and progesterone receptor status in breast cancer can determine therapeutic options and may provide prognostic information. The purpose of this study is to compare the concordance of the primary breast cancer steroid hormone receptor status to that of the recurrent breast cancer and to determine whether the type of second lesion (local recurrence, second primary, or metastatic lesion) and adjuvant therapy received changed the receptor concordance. The records of eighty-three patients with estrogen receptor (ER) analysis available for primary (p) and recurrent (r) breast cancer for 1976-1990 were reviewed. In addition, 32 of these patients also had available progesterone receptor (PR) values for primary and recurrent breast cancers. Statistical evaluation was performed by chi-square, Student's t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ER concordance (primary/recurrent, p/r) was identified in 59/83 (71%) patients; PR concordance was identified in 18/32 (56%) patients. Whether the second lesion was a local recurrence, second primary, or a metastatic lesion did not affect ER concordance or PR concordance. Adjuvant chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or radiation therapy, either alone or in combination, did not affect ER or PR concordance. The disease-free survival (DFS) for patients with ER (p+)/(r-) (primary receptor positive/recurrent receptor negative) was significantly shorter than those with ER (p-)/(r+)(27.6 +/- 7.4 months versus 50.6 +/- 7.6 mo, P = 0.04). The DFS for PR (p+)/(r-) patients was 28.8 +/- 7.9 months compared to the DFS of 46.8 +/- 11.8 months for PR (p-)/(r+) patients (P = NS). A significantly shorter DFS for ER (p+)/(r-) patients compared to ER (p-)/(r+) patients and a trend towards a shorter DFS for PR (p+)/(r-) patients compared to PR (p-)/(r+) patients may reflect a loss of hormonal regulation or an increase in cancer aggressiveness.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The Authors report their experience on the incidence of anastomotic recurrence in 122 patients surgically treated with colorectal resection for cancer. The number of local recurrences (3 cases, that is 2.5%) is in the inferior range of what reported in Literature. Parameters that influence the local failure are: depth of tumor invasion, extension to adjacent organs and structures, presence of lymph node metastases (valuable with Dukes' modified staging). Type of operation and histologic grade do not seem to influence local recurrence. The Authors report the therapeutic choices adopted in the cases considered.
We have been using endoluminal ultrasonography since 1988 as part of the follow-up procedure after colorectal surgery. A total of 106 patients with anterior resection of the rectum or the sigmoid colon were involved in 1988. The follow-up period for these patients ranged from 1 to 56 months after surgery (23.1 +/- 15.1 months after anterior resection of the rectum; 25.7 +/- 22 months after anterior resection of the sigmoid). During the observation period 7 patients developed recurrence after anterior resection of the rectum and 5 after anterior resection of the sigmoid. The primary stages for these patients had been 7 cases of Dukes' B, 3 of Dukes' C1 and 2 of Dukes' D. Raised serum CEA levels were found in 5 cases. In 3 other cases, we found pathological changes in the anastomotic region by means of endoscopy. In these the endorectal ultrasonic scan showed hypodense masses as a sign of recurrence. In 2 of these 3 cases, the serum CEA level was normal. In 4 cases endoluminal rectal ultrasonography alone was suspicious. This led to further diagnostic procedures and finally to radical excision. All suspicious ultrasonic images were monitored 2 to 4 weeks later. In cases of suspicion, endoscopic, needle or surgical transrectal biopsies were taken from all patients. In all cases, histological analysis confirmed the ultrasonic diagnosis of local recurrence.
Local recurrence of rectal adenocarcinoma is mainly due to failure to remove all the tumour. A method is described for the routine detection of involvement of the circumferential (lateral) resection margin. Current definitions of the length of the rectum are inadequate for the assessment of the risk of local recurrence as the rectum frequently extends higher than 15 cm. Use of the term recto-sigmoid should be replaced clinically by sigmoidoscopic measurement of the height of a tumour and pathologically by its anatomical relationship to the level of peritoneal reflection, i.e. lower or upper segment of the rectum or the sigmoid colon. Tumours above the peritoneal reflection (upper segment) are at risk of circumferential resection margin involvement due to their retroperitoneal component. The amount of tissue excised varies considerably from surgeon to surgeon. Meticulous attention to the clearance of the tumour at the circumferential resection margin is essential if local recurrence rates are to be reduced. A trial of postoperative radiotherapy should be instigated based on the pathologist's identification of patients at high risk of local recurrence.
BACKGROUND: One of the key issues in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma is the efficacy of repeat resection of local recurrence and metastatic disease in affected patients. Options in the treatment of locally recurrent or metastatic disease are limited because chemotherapy and radiotherapy generally do not provide any significant prolongation in survival in treated patients. METHODS: A series of 113 patients who presented to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center for treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma are presented. RESULTS: The median overall survival for all 113 patients was 38 months (5-year survival, 37%). Patients presenting with early stage I or II disease (n = 57) had a median survival of 101 months (5-year survival, 60%), whereas those with late stage III or IV disease (n = 56) had a median survival of 15 months (5-year survival, 10%). Patients who had complete primary resection (n = 68) had a median survival of 74 months (5-year survival, 55%), whereas those with incomplete primary resection (n = 45) had a median survival of 12 months (5-year survival, 5%). Resection of locally recurrent or distant metastatic disease was performed in 47 of these patients. Patients who had a complete second resection had a median survival of 74 months (5-year survival, 57%), whereas those with incomplete second resection had a median survival of 16 months (5-year survival, 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Improved survival is seen in patients who present with early stage and have complete primary resection. Patients who undergo complete repeat resection of local recurrence or distant metastasis also have improved survival. Complete repeat resection was more readily accomplished in discrete distant metastatic lesions compared with bulky local recurrences.
Twenty-nine cases of primary carcinoma of the vagina were reviewed. Vaginal carcinoma produced symptoms in 26 cases and postmenopausal bleeding was the most frequently observed symptom. Squamous carcinoma was the dominating histologic type (83%). Twelve patients had previously been treated for invasive or preinvasive cervical disease. Six patients had previously received pelvic irradiation. The median time from cervical carcinoma to vaginal carcinoma was 20 years, and from pelvic irradiation to vaginal carcinoma, 25 years. Two factors significantly influenced the results of treatment: the mode of delivery of radiation therapy and the total tumor dose. Clinical staging did not significantly influence the results of treatment although stage I patients did better than stage II-IV patients. Combination of external pelvic irradiation and brachytherapy, with a total tumor dose of 7000 R or more, was necessary to prevent local recurrence.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic value of the posttreatment TNM stage as a predictor of outcome in locally advanced rectal cancers treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1993 and 2000, 128 patients with tethered (103) or fixed (25) rectal cancers were treated with 50 Gy preoperative pelvic radiotherapy and two cycles of concurrent 5-fluorouracil infusion (20 mg/kg/d) and leucovorin (200 mg/m(2)/d) chemotherapy on Days 1-4 and 22-25 and a single bolus mitomycin C injection (8 mg/m(2)) on Day 1. Of the 128 patients, 111 had Stage T3 and 17 Stage T4 according to the rectal ultrasound or CT findings and clinical evaluation. All 128 patients underwent surgery 8 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. Postoperatively, the disease stage was determined according to the surgical and pathologic findings using the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients, 32 had postchemoradiotherapy (pCR) Stage 0 (T0N0M0), 37 pCR Stage I, 26 pCR Stage II, 28 pCR Stage III, and 5 pCR Stage IV disease. Of the 128 patients, 79 had pCR Stage T0-T2, 35 pCR Stage T3, and 14 pCR Stage T4. The rate of T stage downstaging was 66% (84 of 128). Of the 128 patients, 25% achieved a pathologic complete response, and 31 (24%) had positive nodal disease. Lymphovascular or perineural invasion was found in 13 patients (10%). The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 97% for pCR Stage 0, 88% for pCR Stage I, 74% for pCR Stage II, 44% for pCR Stage III, and 0% for pCR Stage IV (p = 0.0000059). The 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 97% for pCR Stage 0, 80% for pCR Stage I, 72% for pCR Stage II, 42% for pCR Stage III, and 0% for pCR Stage IV (p < 0.000001). In univariate analysis, the pretreatment tumor status (fixed vs. tethered tumors), the pCR TNM stage, T stage downstaging, pathologic T4 tumors, node-positive disease after chemoradiotherapy, and lymphovascular or perineural invasion were statistically significant prognosticators of disease-specific survival and relapse-free survival. pCR Stage T4 disease was a strong predictor of local recurrence. The 5-year local control rate was 98% for pCR T0-T2, 89% for pCR T3, and 65% for pCR T4 disease (p = 0.00044). In multivariate analysis, the pCR TNM stage was the most statistically significant independent predictor of survival (p = 0.003) and relapse-free survival (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer, the pCR TNM stage was a strong prognosticator of recurrence and survival. It can be used to identify high-risk patients for additional postoperative therapy.
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence and metastatic pattern of multifocal renal cell carcinoma in radical nephrectomy specimens and to use these findings to guide the choice of operative procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pathology reports for 161 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy at Walter Reed Army Medical Center between 1980 and 1995 were reviewed to evaluate tumor size, stage, and incidence of multifocal tumors. RESULTS: Multicentric neoplasms occurred in 16 of 161 (9.9%) radical nephrectomy specimens from the same institution. Thirteen of the 16 multifocal tumors had cross-sectional diameters > or = 3.5 cm. Of the 16 multifocal carcinomas, 11 were noted in stage I tumors. Multifocal neoplasms were not identified with primary tumors of < 2 cm. CONCLUSION: Our data support previous reports that the incidence of multicentric renal malignancy is low and suggest that patients with small, unilateral masses (< 2 cm) can undergo kidney-sparing surgery with little risk of local recurrence.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Mutations at codons 12, 13, and 61 of the ras genes have been found in a variety of human tumors and may have prognostic significance. K-ras mutations have been shown in 40%-50% of colorectal cancers. METHODS: Using a simple nonradioactive polymerase chain reaction-based technique, we have investigated the possible prognostic significance of point mutations of the K-ras gene in patients with human colorectal carcinomas. The prevalence and the type of ras mutations were compared between a group of 35 patients having recurrent disease within 5 years and a group of 64 patients who were disease free 5 years following surgery. RESULTS: First, we found that the overall prevalence of mutations within codons 12 and 13 of the K-ras gene was 25% in the nonrecurring group vs. 71% in the patients with recurrent disease (P < 0.0001) and, second, that mutations other than GGT to GAT occurred, with one exception, exclusively in recurring tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In Dukes' B and C primary tumors, mutations other than GGT to GAT identify patients at very high risk for recurrence. Our results indicate that determining the K-ras mutations provides a good prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of this study is to determinate incidence and risk factors for loco regional failure (LRR) (breast, supraclavicular, axillary and internal mammary nodes) and indications for nodal irradiation. From January 1980 to December 2001, 4,185 patients with T1-T2 breast cancer were treated with conservative surgery and whole breast radiotherapy without nodal irradiation at the University of Florence. The median age was 55 years (range 19-86). All patients were followed for a median of eight years (range 3 months to 20 years). Multivariate analysis showed as independent prognostic factors for isolated nodal relapse (NR) the presence of more than three positive lymph nodes (PAN) (p = 0.001), angiolymphatic invasion (p = 0.002) and pT2 (p = 0.02). However, only 4.8% of patients with more than three PAN developed NR as the only site of recurrence. Having one to three PAN was not associated with an increased risk of NR. We believe that it is not necessary to prescribe nodal irradiation to patients with negative or one to three PAN. Regarding patients with more than three PAN, the number of isolated NR is also small to routinely justify a node irradiation.