SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “RNA Editing”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Mitochondrial RNA editing is sequence specific and independent of transcript abundance in Sorghum bicolor.

The DNA sequence which encodes the amino-terminal extension to the conserved core of the atp6-1 gene found in line IS1112C is absent from Tx398. Sequences further upstream are present in Tx398, but at a different genomic location. The atp6-2 genes are present in similar copy numbers in IS1112C and A3Tx398, a near-isogenic line carrying the IS1112C cytoplasm in a Tx398 background. However, transcript abundance of atp6-2 in these lines is about ten-times higher than that of atp6-1. RNA editing of atp6-1 transcripts is identical to that of atp6-2 and therefore sequence specific. A single non-silent editing site in the unique atp6-1 pre-piece sequence may indicate mitochondrial-guided RNA editing. While in Petunia the abundance and RNA editing of a transcript are correlated, we show here that RNA editing is independent of transcript abundance and is sequence specific in Sorghum.

DNA, Complementary↗

PubMed2001

Heterologous, splicing-dependent RNA editing in chloroplasts: allotetraploidy provides trans-factors.

RNA editing is unique among post-transcriptional processes in plastids, as it exhibits extraordinary phylogenetic dynamics leading to species-specific editing site patterns. The evolutionary loss of a site is considered to entail the loss of the corresponding nuclear-encoded site-specific factor, which prevents the editing of foreign, i.e. heterologous, sites. We investigated the editing of short 'spliced' and 'unspliced' ndhA gene fragments from spinach in Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco) in vivo using biolistic transformation. Surprisingly, it turned out that the spinach site is edited in the heterologous nuclear background. Furthermore, only exon-exon fusions were edited, whereas intron-containing messages remained unprocessed. A homologue of the spinach site was found to be present and edited in Nicotiana tomentosiformis, representing the paternal parent, but absent from Nicotiana sylvestris, representing the maternal parent of tobacco. Our data show that: (i) the cis-determinants for ndhA editing are split by an intron; (ii) the editing capacity cannot be deduced from editing sites; and (iii) allopolyploidization can increase the editing capacity, which implies that it can influence speciation processes in evolution.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2003

Substrate analogues for an RNA-editing adenosine deaminase: mechanistic investigation and inhibitor design.

ADARs are adenosine deaminases that act on RNA and are responsible for RNA-editing reactions that occur in eukaryotic mRNAs, including the mRNAs of glutamate and serotonin receptors. ADARs capable of editing biologically relevant RNA substrates have been identified. In addition, the consequence of the RNA-editing reaction on the function of the gene product is known in several cases. However, our understanding of the chemical mechanism of the ADAR-catalyzed adenosine deamination in RNA is lagging. By studying analogues of a naturally occurring substrate for ADAR2, we infer features of the enzyme's active site and reaction mechanism. 8-Aza substitution at adenosine in various RNA substrates accelerates the rate of deamination at these sites by ADAR2 (2.8-17-fold). The magnitude of this "aza effect" depends on the RNA structural context of the reacting nucleotide. N(6)-Methyladenosine in RNA is a slow substrate for ADAR2 (rate is 2% that of adenosine), with no product observed with N(6)-ethyladenosine, suggesting a limited size of the leaving group pocket. 2,6-Diaminopurine ribonucleoside in RNA is not a substrate for ADAR, in contrast to adenosine deaminase (ADA), which catalyzes a similar reaction on nucleosides. This and other results indicate that ADAR2 uses a base recognition strategy different from that of ADA. Consistent with the large 8-aza effect observed for the ADAR2 reaction, we find that 8-azanebularine, as the free nucleoside, inhibits the ADAR2 reaction (IC(50) = 15 +/- 3 mM) with no inhibition observed with nebularine or coformycin.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2004

High resolution crystal structure of a key editosome enzyme from Trypanosoma brucei: RNA editing ligase 1.

Trypanosomatids are causative agents of several devastating tropical diseases such as African sleeping sickness, Chagas' disease and leishmaniasis. There are no effective vaccines available to date for treatment of these protozoan diseases, while current drugs have limited efficacy, significant toxicity and suffer from increasing resistance. Trypanosomatids have several remarkable and unique metabolic and structural features that are of great interest for developing new anti-protozoan therapeutics. One such feature is "RNA editing", an essential process in these pathogenic protozoa. Transcripts for key trypanosomatid mitochondrial proteins undergo extensive post-transcriptional RNA editing by specifically inserting or deleting uridylates from pre-mature mRNA in order to create mature mRNAs that encode functional proteins. The RNA editing process is carried out in a approximately 1.6 MDa multi-protein complex, the editosome. In Trypanosoma brucei, one of the editosome's core enzymes, the RNA editing ligase 1 (TbREL1), has been shown to be essential for survival of both insect and bloodstream forms of the parasite. We report here the crystal structure of the catalytic domain of TbREL1 at 1.2 A resolution, in complex with ATP and magnesium. The magnesium ion interacts with the beta and gamma-phosphate groups and is almost perfectly octahedrally coordinated by six phosphate and water oxygen atoms. ATP makes extensive direct and indirect interactions with the ligase via essentially all its atoms while extending its base into a deep pocket. In addition, the ATP makes numerous interactions with residues that are conserved in the editing ligases only. Further away from the active site, TbREL1 contains a unique loop containing several hydrophobic residues that are highly conserved among trypanosomatid RNA editing ligases which may play a role in protein-protein interactions in the editosome. The distinct characteristics of the adenine-binding pocket, and the absence of any close homolog in the human genome, bode well for the design of selective inhibitors that will block the essential RNA ligase function in a number of major protozoan pathogens.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed2003

Kinetoplastid RNA editing ligases: complex association, characterization, and substrate requirements.

RNA editing processes kinetoplastid mitochondrial transcripts post-transcriptionally by inserting and deleting uridylates (Us) to produce functional mRNAs. The activities of the RNA ligases in the multienzyme complex (the editosome) that catalyzes editing and of the recombinant proteins were characterized and found to be similar. Ligation of two RNA fragments was enhanced when bridged by a complementary RNA or DNA, which left no gaps or overhangs. An acceptor nucleotide preference of G>U>C>A was observed in the absence of exogenous ATP but U was preferred upon addition of ATP and ligase activity was increased. The substrate specificity and catalytic characteristics indicate that RNA ligase activity contributes to the accuracy of RNA editing.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Selective RNA editing and subunit assembly of native glutamate receptors.

RNA editing and subunit assembly of ionotropic glutamate receptors (GluRs) were examined in an oligodendrocyte progenitor cell line, CG4, which expresses GluR2-GluR4, GluR6, GluR7, KA1, and KA2. AMPA-evoked currents rapidly desensitize, whereas kainate-evoked currents contain a steady-state component with a nearly linear current-voltage relation and a fast desensitizing component that is inwardly rectifying. The Q/R site is edited > 95% to the arginine codon in GluR2(Q607) mRNA, and < 5% in GluR6(Q621) mRNA. Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrate that GluR6 and/or GluR7 subunits assemble with KA2, but not with GluR2-GluR4. These results indicate that oligodendrocyte progenitor cells selectively edit and assemble glutamate receptors into at least two functionally and structurally distinct heteromeric channels.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

A systematic search for RNA editing sites in pea chloroplasts: an editing event causes diversification from the evolutionarily conserved amino acid sequence.

RNA editing in higher plant chloroplasts involves C-to-U conversion at specific sites in the transcripts. To examine whether pea shares editing sites with other angiosperms, a systematic search for editing sites in pea chloroplast transcripts was performed. Based on amino acid sequence alignment, 451 RNA editing sites were predicted from 60 transcripts. Sequence analysis of amplified cDNAs for these potential editing sites revealed 19 true editing sites from 13 transcripts. Together with those reported previously, the total number of editing sites is 27 from 16 transcripts in pea chloroplasts. Twenty-two sites are conserved among other plant species, whereas five sites are unique to pea. Among the 27 editing sites, seven are partially edited. The most interesting is the ndhG site 1, which has led to the diversification of the evolutionarily conserved amino acid sequence. This observation suggests that some of the editing events cause the diversity of amino acid sequences, and hence, that prediction of editing sites based on amino acid sequence alignment has its own limitations.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1995

RNA editing in wheat mitochondria proceeds by a deamination mechanism.

Most if not all mitochondrial messenger RNAs from seed plants undergo a post-transcriptional modification (RNA editing) involving the conversion of some cytidine residues to uridine. Using a molecular hybridization approach, an in vitro RNA editing system, able to faithfully reproduce the in vivo observed C to U changes of subunit 9 (atp9) of wheat mitochondrial ATP synthase mRNA, has been described [Araya et al. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1040-1044]. In this work we extend these studies to better understand the biochemical mechanism of this process. RNA editing was analysed by P1 nuclease digestion of the reaction product followed by thin layer chromatography. Experiments performed with unedited [3H]RNA labelled on the base and with unedited [32P]RNA labelled at the alpha-phosphate of cytidine residues, indicate that plant mitochondrial RNA editing operates through a deamination mechanism.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed1996

Structural requirements for RNA editing in glutamate receptor pre-mRNAs by recombinant double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase.

Pre-mRNAs for brain-expressed ionotropic glutamate receptor subunits undergo RNA editing by site-specific adenosine deamination, which alters codons for molecular determinants of channel function. This nuclear process requires double-stranded RNA structures formed by exonic and intronic sequences in the pre-mRNA and is likely to be catalyzed by an adenosine deaminase that recognizes these structures as a substrate. DRADA, a double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase, is a candidate enzyme for L-glutamate-activated receptor channel (GluR) pre-mRNA editing. We show here that DRADA indeed edits GluR pre-mRNAs, but that it displays selectivity for certain editing sites. Recombinantly expressed DRADA, both in its full-length form and in an N-terminally truncated version, edited the Q/R site in GluR6 pre-mRNA and the R/G site but not the Q/R site of GluR-B pre-mRNA. This substrate selectivity correlated with the base pairing status and sequence environment of the editing-targeted adenosines. The Q/R site of GluR-B pre-mRNA was edited by an activity partially purified from HeLa cells and thus differently structured editing sites in GluR pre-mRNAs appear to be substrates for different enzymatic activities.

Adenosine↗

PubMed2001

RNA editing of the ribosomal protein S13 transcripts in magnolia and sunflower mitochondria.

To obtain information on ribosomal protein gene content and RNA editing in plant mitochondria, we investigated the conservation of the gene for ribosomal protein S13 (rps13) in the mitochondrial genomes of Magnolia spp. and Helianthus annuus. A complete rps13 open reading frame was identified in the mitochondrial genome of Magnolia and Helianthus. Comparison of genomic and cDNA sequences revealed that transcripts from the mitochondrial rps13 locus in both Magnolia and Helianthus undergo RNA editing suggesting the functionality of the related gene. Six and four editing events in the rps13 transcript population of Magnolia and Helianthus mitochondria, respectively, cause critical changes of codons and, consequently, induce 5 and 3.4% amino acid modifications in the respective genomically-encoded S13 polypeptides. Both editing pattern and efficiency of RNA editing differ in the reverse transcription (RT)-PCR-derived cDNA populations from the rps13 locus from the analyzed plant species with only the Magnolia rps13 being fully edited.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

The effect of RNA interference Down-regulation of RNA editing 3'-terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) 1 on mitochondrial de novo protein synthesis and stability of respiratory complexes in Trypanosoma brucei.

Inhibition of RNA editing by down-regulation of expression of the mitochondrial RNA editing TUTase 1 by RNA interference had profound effects on kinetoplast biogenesis in Trypanosoma brucei procyclic cells. De novo synthesis of the apocytochrome b and cytochrome oxidase subunit I proteins was no longer detectable after 3 days of RNAi. The effect on protein synthesis correlated with a decline in the levels of the assembled mitochondrial respiratory complexes III and IV, and also cyanide-sensitive oxygen uptake. The steady-state levels of nuclear-encoded subunits of complexes III and IV were also significantly decreased. Because the levels of the corresponding mRNAs were not affected, the observed effect was likely due to an increased turnover of these imported mitochondrial proteins. This induced protein degradation was selective for components of complexes III and IV, because little effect was observed on components of the F(1).F(0)-ATPase complex and on several other mitochondrial proteins.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

RNA editing activity is associated with splicing factors in lnRNP particles: The nuclear pre-mRNA processing machinery.

Multiple members of the ADAR (adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) gene family are involved in A-to-I RNA editing. It has been speculated that they may form a large multicomponent protein complex. Possible candidates for such complexes are large nuclear ribonucleoprotein (lnRNP) particles. The lnRNP particles consist mainly of four spliceosomal subunits that assemble together with the pre-mRNA to form a large particle and thus are viewed as the naturally assembled pre-mRNA processing machinery. Here we investigated the presence of ADARs in lnRNP particles by Western blot analysis using anti-ADAR antibodies and by indirect immunoprecipitation. Both ADAR1 and ADAR2 were found associated with the spliceosomal components Sm and SR proteins within the lnRNP particles. The two ADARs, associated with lnRNP particles, were enzymatically active in site-selective A-to-I RNA editing. We demonstrate the association of ADAR RNA editing enzymes with physiological supramolecular complexes, the lnRNP particles.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed1998

Assays for investigating RNA editing in plant mitochondria.

In plant organelles transcripts are modified posttranscriptionally by RNA editing. This modification process changes almost every protein-coding RNA at specific cytidine and uridine positions. Therefore, mitochondrially encoded protein sequences differ from the genomically fixed information and show, after editing, a higher conservation. To investigate this unusual processing step in plant mitochondria, several assays have been developed. However, compared with the progress made in other RNA editing fields, knowledge about the factors involved in plant mitochondrial editing is limited. One reason for this is the lack of a reliable in vitro system for mitochondria. To reveal the biochemical nature of the RNA editing reaction in plant mitochondria, we developed an in vitro system by which we were able to show that cytidine is specifically modified to uridine by a deamination or transamination process. Here we describe the development of a pea in vitro system and discuss assays to follow the editing process.

Genetic Techniques↗

PubMed2006

RNA editing by ADAR2 is metabolically regulated in pancreatic islets and beta-cells.

RNA editing via the conversion of adenosine (A) to inosine (I) is catalyzed by two major families of adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs), ADAR1 and ADAR2. This genetic recoding process is known to play essential roles in the brain, due in part to changes in functional activities of edited neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels. Little is known, however, about the physiological regulation and function of A to I RNA editing in peripheral tissues and other biological processes. Here, we report that both ADAR1 and ADAR2 are expressed in the murine pancreatic islets, and ADAR2 is primarily localized in the islet endocrine cells. In contrast to ADAR1, ADAR2 transcripts in the pancreatic islets exhibit a nearly 2-fold increase in insulin-resistant mice chronically fed a high fat diet. Concurrent with this diet-induced metabolic stress, RNA editing in the islets is dramatically enhanced for the RNA transcripts encoding the ionotropic glutamate receptor subunit B. Moreover, ADAR2 protein expression is repressed in the islets under fuel deficiency condition during fasting, and this repression can be completely reversed by refeeding. We also show that, specifically in pancreatic beta-cell lines, not only the expression of ADAR2 but also the glutamate receptor subunit B editing and ADAR2 self-editing are markedly augmented in response to glucose at the physiological concentration for insulin secretion stimulation. Thus, RNA editing by ADAR2 in pancreatic islets and beta-cells is metabolically regulated by nutritional and energy status, suggesting that A to I RNA editing is most likely involved in the modulation of pancreatic islet and beta-cell function.

Adenosine Deaminase↗

PubMed1994

RNA editing in mitochondria of cultured trypanosomatids: translatable mRNAs for NADH-dehydrogenase subunits are missing.

RNA editing in mitochondria of kinetoplastid protozoa involves the posttranscriptional insertion and deletion of uridylate residues in protein encoding regions of pre-mRNAs. Editing is required to remove gene-encoded translational defects or to convert a nonsense sequence into a sense message. In cultured trypanosomatids, however, translationally defective pre-mRNAs for a number of NADH-dehydrogenase subunits are not converted into functional mRNAs by editing. In this report, the available data are discussed in the context of current models for RNA editing.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Identification of RNA editing sites in the SNP database.

The relationship between human inherited genomic variations and phenotypic differences has been the focus of much research effort in recent years. These studies benefit from millions of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) records available in public databases, such as dbSNP. The importance of identifying false dbSNP records increases with the growing role played by SNPs in linkage analysis for disease traits. In particular, the emerging understanding of the abundance of DNA and RNA editing calls for a careful distinction between inherited SNPs and somatic DNA and RNA modifications. In order to demonstrate that some of the SNP database records are actually somatic modification, we focus on one type of these modifications, namely A-to-I RNA editing, and present evidence for hundreds of dbSNP records that are actually editing sites. We provide a list of 102 RNA editing sites previously annotated in dbSNP database as SNPs, and experimentally validate seven of these. Interestingly, we show how dbSNP can serve as a starting point to look for new editing sites. Our results, for this particular type of RNA editing, demonstrate the need for a careful analysis of SNP databases in light of the increasing recognition of the significance of somatic sequence modifications.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Varied assembly and RNA editing efficiencies between genotypes I and II hepatitis D virus and their implications.

The mechanisms that link genotypes of hepatitis D virus (HDV) with clinical outcomes have not yet been elucidated. Genotypic variations are unevenly distributed along the sequences of hepatitis delta antigens (HDAgs). Of these variations, the packaging signal at the C-terminus has a divergence of 74% between genotypes I and II. In this report, we address the issue of whether these high variations between genotypes affect assembly efficiency of HDV particles and editing efficiency of RNA. Viral package systems of transfection with expression plasmids of hepatitis B surface antigen and HDAgs or whole genomes of HDV consistently indicate that the package efficiency of genotype I HDV is higher than that of genotype II. Segment swapping of large-form HDAg indicates that the C-terminal 19-residue region plays a key role for the varied assembly efficiencies. Also, the editing efficiency of genotype I HDV is higher than that of genotype II. The nucleotide and structural changes surrounding the editing site may explain why genotype II HDV has a low RNA editing efficiency. The findings of in vitro assembly systems were further supported by the observations that patients infected with genotype II had significantly lower alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, more favorable outcomes (P <.05), and a trend to have lower serum HDV RNA levels as compared with those infected with genotype I HDV (P =.094). In conclusion, genotype II HDV secretes fewer viral particles than genotype I HDV does, which in turn may reduce the extent of infection of hepatocytes and result in less severe hepatic inflammation.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

RNA editing of the human serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C receptor silences constitutive activity.

RNA transcripts encoding the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine 2C (5-HT2C) receptor (5-HT2CR) undergo adenosine-to-inosine RNA editing events at up to five specific sites. Compared with rat brain, human brain samples expressed higher levels of RNA transcripts encoding the amino acids valine-serine-valine (5-HT2C-VSV) and valine-glycine-valine (5-HT2C-VGV) at positions 156, 158, and 160, respectively. Agonist stimulation of the nonedited human receptor (5-HT2C-INI) and the edited 5-HT2C-VSV and 5-HT2C-VGV receptor variants stably expressed in NIH-3T3 fibroblasts demonstrated that serotonergic agonists were less potent at the edited receptors. Competition binding experiments revealed a guanine nucleotide-sensitive serotonin high affinity state only for the 5-HT2C-INI receptor; the loss of high affinity agonist binding to the edited receptor demonstrates that RNA editing generates unique 5-HT2CRs that couple less efficiently to G proteins. This reduced G protein coupling for the edited isoforms is primarily due to silencing of the constitutive activity of the nonedited 5-HT2CR. The distinctions in agonist potency and constitutive activity suggest that different edited 5-HT2CRs exhibit distinct responses to serotonergic ligands and further imply that RNA editing represents a novel mechanism for controlling physiological signaling at serotonergic synapses.

3T3 Cells↗