PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Signal Recognition Particle”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

Ffh and FtsY in a Mycoplasma mycoides signal-recognition particle pathway: SRP RNA and M domain of Ffh are not required for stimulation of GTPase activity in vitro.

Mycoplasma mycoides contains a signal-recognition particle (SRP) composed of an RNA molecule and an SRP54 homologue (Ffh). We have now identified a mycoplasma homologue to the alpha subunit of the mammalian SRP receptor and Escherichia coli FtsY. The protein (MmFtsY) was expressed in E. coli and purified to homogeneity. MmFtsY has a weak intrinsic GTPase activity but GTP hydrolysis was markedly stimulated when it was combined with mycoplasma Ffh (MmFfh) and SRP RNA. Also, in the absence of SRP RNA GTPase activity was significantly enhanced. Furthermore, GTP hydrolysis was stimulated when MmFtsY was combined with the N-terminal GTPase domain (N+G) of MmFfh. These findings indicate that basic features of the GTPase activation mechanism are independent of the C-terminal M domain of the MmFfh protein. We propose that the activation is mediated to a large extent by contacts between the GTPase domains of the mycoplasma Ffh and FtsY proteins and that the contribution of the M domain and SRP RNA in the activation mechanism is mainly for modifying the conformation of the MmFfh GTPase domain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The SRP9/14 subunit of the human signal recognition particle binds to a variety of Alu-like RNAs and with higher affinity than its mouse homolog.

The heterodimeric subunit, SRP9/14, of the signal recognition particle (SRP) has previously been found to bind to scAlu and scB1 RNAs in vitro and to exist in large excess over SRP in anthropoid cells. Here we show that human and mouse SRP9/14 bind with high affinities to other Alu-like RNAs of different evolutionary ages including the neuron-specific BC200 RNA. The relative dissociation constants of the different RNA-protein complexes are inversely proportional to the evolutionary distance between the Alu RNA species and 7SL RNA. In addition, the human SRP9/14 binds with higher affinity than mouse SRP9/14 to all RNAs analyzed and this difference is not explained by the additional C-terminal domain present in the anthropoid SRP14. The conservation of high affinity interactions between SRP9/14 and Alu-like RNAs strongly indicates that these Alu-like RNPs exist in vivo and that they have cellular functions. The observation that human SRP9/14 binds better than its mouse counterpart to distantly related Alu RNAs, such as recently transposed elements, suggests that the anthropoid-specific excess of SRP9/14 may have a role in controlling Alu amplification rather than in compensating a defect in SRP assembly and functions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Diversity of 7 SL RNA from the signal recognition particle of maize endosperm.

An 11 S ribonucleoprotein particle was isolated from maize endosperm and shown to be functionally and structurally equivalent to the mammalian signal recognition particle. However, unlike animal cells which apparently contain a single 7 SL RNA species, maize endosperm contains a heterogeneous population of 7 SL RNA. To investigate this diversity, we have cloned and sequenced a number of the maize endosperm 7 SL RNAs isolated from functionally active SRP preparations. Some maize 7 SL RNAs are strikingly similar, differing by single base changes or short deletions; surprisingly, others share less than 70 percent sequence homology. Despite differences in primary sequence, nearly identical secondary structures can be suggested for all maize 7 SL RNAs, consistent with a proposed functional role in protein translocation for each of these RNAs. The amount of new available sequence data enabled us to define two conserved regions of presumed functional importance: A conserved sequence -G-N-A-R- in the center of a variable region which forms a well defined stem-loop and possibly is involved in an interaction with the 19 kDa protein of the SRP. Secondly, three short nucleotide stretches located in the central domain of 7 SL RNA may form part of a dynamic RNA-switch structure.

Base Sequence↗

The DsbA signal sequence directs efficient, cotranslational export of passenger proteins to the Escherichia coli periplasm via the signal recognition particle pathway.

The Escherichia coli cytoplasmic protein thioredoxin 1 can be efficiently exported to the periplasmic space by the signal sequence of the DsbA protein (DsbAss) but not by the signal sequence of alkaline phosphatase (PhoA) or maltose binding protein (MBP). Using mutations of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway, we found that DsbAss directs thioredoxin 1 to the SRP export pathway. When DsbAss is fused to MBP, MBP also is directed to the SRP pathway. We show directly that the DsbAss-promoted export of MBP is largely cotranslational, in contrast to the mode of MBP export when the native signal sequence is utilized. However, both the export of thioredoxin 1 by DsbAss and the export of DsbA itself are quite sensitive to even the slight inhibition of SecA. These results suggest that SecA may be essential for both the slow posttranslational pathway and the SRP-dependent cotranslational pathway. Finally, probably because of its rapid folding in the cytoplasm, thioredoxin provides, along with gene fusion approaches, a sensitive assay system for signal sequences that utilize the SRP pathway.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

A mutation in the signal recognition particle 7S RNA of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica preferentially affects synthesis of the alkaline extracellular protease: in vivo evidence for translational arrest.

Replacement of the signal recognition particle (SRP) 7S gene (SCR1) on a replicating plasmid with scr1-1 (G to A at 129 and A to T at 131 in the consensus sequence -GNAR- in the loop of domain III) resulted in temperature sensitivity for growth of cells in which both chromosomal SRP 7S RNA genes were deleted. Pulse-chase immunoprecipitation experiments were done after a shift to non-permissive temperature using the major secreted protein the alkaline extracellular protease (AEP) as a reporter molecule. No untranslocated AEP precursor was detected in a strain with scr1-1 on a plasmid, but the amount of the largest AEP precursor (55 kD) immunoprecipitated as a percentage of total protein synthesized was reduced 68% compared to an isogenic strain with SCR1 on the plasmid. The possibility that an untranslocated precursor was synthesized but not detected because of instability was largely eliminated by detection of a 53-kD untranslocated precursor of a mutated AEP (P17M; methionine replaced proline in the second position of the pro-peptide) which chased to the 55-kD translocated AEP precursor. Thus, SRP has a role in the biosynthesis of AEP. Possibly, the scr1-1 mutation does not affect signal recognition or translational arrest but instead results in maintenance of translational arrest of AEP synthesis. The results also suggest that AEP can be translocated in vivo either co-translationally in which SRP is at least involved in biosynthesis or posttranslationally without SRP involvement.

Alleles↗

Role of Sec61alpha in the regulated transfer of the ribosome-nascent chain complex from the signal recognition particle to the translocation channel.

Targeting of ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the translocon in the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by the concerted action of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and the SRP receptor (SR). Ribosome-stripped microsomes were digested with proteases to sever cytoplasmic domains of SRalpha, SRbeta, TRAM, and the Sec61 complex. We characterized protein translocation intermediates that accumulate when Sec61alpha or SRbeta is inactivated by proteolysis. In the absence of a functional Sec61 complex, dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence is blocked. Experiments using SR proteoliposomes confirmed the assembly of a membrane-bound posttargeting intermediate. These results strongly suggest that the Sec61 complex regulates the GTP hydrolysis cycle of the SRP-SR complex at the stage of signal sequence dissociation from SRP54.

Animals↗

New prospects in studying the bacterial signal recognition particle pathway.

In vivo and in vitro studies have suggested that the bacterial version of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) system plays an essential and selective role in protein biogenesis. The bacterial SRP system consists of at least two proteins and an RNA molecule (termed Ffh, FtsY and 4.5S RNA, respectively, in Escherichia coli). Recent evidence suggests that other putative bacterial-specific SRP components may also exist. In vitro experiments confirmed the expected basic features of the bacterial SRP system by demonstrating interactions among the SRP components themselves, between them and ribosomes, ribosome-linked hydrophobic nascent polypeptides or inner membranes. The availability of a conserved (and essential) bacterial SRP version has facilitated the implementation of powerful genetic and biochemical approaches for studying the cascade of events during the SRP-mediated targeting process in vivo and in vitro as well as the three-dimensional structures and the properties of each SRP component and complex.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Signal recognition particle receptor is important for cell growth and protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In mammalian cells, the signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor is required for the targeting of nascent secretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. We have identified the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of the alpha-subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha) and characterized its function in vivo. S. cerevisiae SR alpha is a 69-kDa peripheral membrane protein that is 32% identical (54% chemically similar) to its mammalian homologue and, like mammalian SR alpha, is predicted to contain a GTP binding domain. Yeast cells that contain the SR alpha gene (SRP101) under control of the GAL1 promoter show impaired translocation of soluble and membrane proteins across the ER membrane after depletion of SR alpha. The degree of the translocation defect varies for different proteins. The defects are similar to those observed in SRP deficient cells. Disruption of the SRP101 gene results in an approximately sixfold reduction in the growth rate of the cells. Disruption of the gene encoding SRP RNA (SCR1) or both SCR1 and SRP101 resulted in an indistinguishable growth phenotype, indicating that SRP receptor and SRP function in the same pathway. Taken together, these results suggest that the components and the mechanism of the SRP-dependent protein targeting pathway are evolutionarily conserved yet not essential for cell growth. Surprisingly, cells that are grown for a prolonged time in the absence of SRP or SRP receptor no longer show pronounced protein translocation defects. This adaptation is a physiological process and is not due to the accumulation of a suppressor mutation. The degree of this adaptation is strain dependent.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Targeting proteins to membranes: structure of the signal recognition particle.

In all three kingdoms of life, co-translational targeting of secretory and membrane proteins to the prokaryotic plasma membrane or eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by a ribonucleoprotein complex, the signal recognition particle (SRP), and its membrane-associated receptor (SR). SRP binds to signal sequences of nascent proteins as they emerge from the exit tunnel of the ribosome. The resulting targeting complex, composed of the SRP and the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC), then docks with the SR in a GTP-dependent manner. Passing through a complex series of conformational states, SRP and SR deliver the RNC to the translocon, which in turn mediates protein translocation across or integration into the membrane. The core structural and mechanistic principles of SRP-dependent protein targeting are universally conserved. Recent structural investigations combining X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy have provided new insights into three essentials steps of the SRP-dependent protein targeting cycle: the assembly and interaction of the SRP ribonucleoprotein core, the GTP-dependent SRP-SR association, and the interaction between SRP and the ribosome.

Animals↗

Binding sites of the 19-kDa and 68/72-kDa signal recognition particle (SRP) proteins on SRP RNA as determined in protein-RNA "footprinting".

We have used the nuclease alpha-sarcin to map the binding sites of the 19-kDa and the 68/72-kDa proteins of signal recognition particle (SRP) on SRP RNA. We found that the regions of protection to nuclease afforded by the two proteins were distinct. p19 protected primarily the two tips in the RNA secondary structure. p68/72 protected a large region extending across the center of the particle and altered the nuclease pattern in the regions that p19 would bind, suggesting that these two proteins may be in close proximity in the particle. The protection afforded by the two proteins in combination was equal to the sum of the individual protections. We have not observed cooperativity in the binding of these two proteins as assessed by the protection assay; nor do we have any evidence that the structure becomes more compact as it assembles. The map derived from this "footprint" analysis places the signal recognition domain (p54 bound to the RNA via the 19-kDa protein) and the elongation arrest domain (associated with the Alu end of the particle) on opposite ends of the particle. Thus, it is possible that SRP recognizes signals by the direct interaction of p54 with the signal sequence at the nascent chain exit site and simultaneously blocks elongation by the entrance of p9/14 into the aminoacyl tRNA site 16 nm away.

Animals↗

Changes in 7SL RNA conformation during the signal recognition particle cycle.

The structure of 7SL RNA has been probed by chemical modification followed by primer extension, using four substrates: (i) naked 7SL RNA; (ii) free signal recognition particle (SRP); (iii) polysome bound SRP; and (iv) membrane bound SRP. Decreasing sensitivity to chemical modification between these different substrates suggests regions on 7SL RNA that: bind proteins associated with SRP might interact with ribosomes; and are protected by binding to membranes. Other areas increase in chemical sensitivity, exemplified by a tertiary interaction present in naked 7SL RNA but not in free SRP. Such changes suggest that 7SL RNA changes its conformation during the SRP cycle. These conformational changes could be a necessary component to move through the SRP cycle from one stage to the next.

Animals↗

SRH1 protein, the yeast homologue of the 54 kDa subunit of signal recognition particle, is involved in ER translocation of secretory proteins.

The function of the SRH1 product, the yeast homologue of the 54 kDa subunit of the mammalian signal recognition particle, has been analyzed using a galactose dependent mutant of the gene. SRH1 has been placed under control of the GAL1 promoter and introduced into a haploid cell that had its chromosomal SRH1 copy disrupted. This mutant grows normally on galactose medium but slows down the growth about 10 h after transfer to glucose medium. At the same time, precursor forms of secretory proteins, alpha-mating factor and invertase, accumulate in the cells. This result indicates that the SRH1 product is involved in translocation of precursors of secretory proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in yeast cells.

Base Sequence↗

The relationship between size of a presecretory protein and extent of signal-recognition-particle-mediated arrest of its translation.

Small eukaryotic presecretory proteins, such as preprocecropinA, prepromelittin, and prepropeptideGLa, are transported into mammalian microsomes both with the aid of ribosome and signal recognition particle (SRP) and independently of these ribonucleoprotein particles. Typically, synthetic extensions of these precursor proteins show the phenotype of naturally occurring large presecretory proteins. However, it was shown that small truncated forms of naturally occurring large presecretory proteins are not transport competent or transport competent only in the presence of the two ribonucleoprotein particles. In order to directly address this apparent paradox, we studied the sensitivities of nascent polypeptide chains, related to preprocecropinA and prepromelittin, to SRP-mediated arrest of elongation and compared them with synthetic extensions of various length.

Animals↗

Fluorescence-detected assembly of the signal recognition particle: binding of the two SRP protein heterodimers to SRP RNA is noncooperative.

Protein-RNA and protein-protein interactions involved in the assembly of the signal recognition particle (SRP) were examined using fluorescence spectroscopy. Fluorescein was covalently attached to the 3'-terminal ribose of SRP RNA following periodate oxidation, and the resulting SRP RNA-Fl was reconstituted into a fluorescent SRP species that was functional in promoting translocation of secretory proteins across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Each of the two protein heterodimers purified from SRP elicited a substantial change in fluorescein emission upon association with the modified RNA. The binding of SRP9/14 to singly-labeled SRP RNA-Fl increased fluorescein emission intensity by 41% at pH 7.5 and decreased its anisotropy from 0.18 to 0.16. The binding of SRP68/72 increased the fluorescein anisotropy from 0.18 to 0.23 but did not alter the emission intensity of SRP RNA-Fl. These fluorescence changes did not result from a direct interaction between the dye and protein because the fluorescein remained accessible to both iodide ions and fluorescein-specific antibodies in the complexes. The spectral changes were elicited by specific SRP RNA-protein interactions, since (i) the SRP9/14- and SRP68/72-dependent changes were unique, (ii) an excess of unlabeled SRP RNA, but not of tRNA, blocked the fluorescence changes, and (iii) no emission changes were observed when SRP RNA-Fl was titrated with other RNA-binding proteins. Each heterodimer bound tightly to the RNA, since the Kd values determined spectroscopically and at equilibrium for the SRP9/14 and the SRP68/72 complexes with SRP RNA-Fl were less than 0.1 and 7 +/- 3 nM, respectively. The binding affinity of SRP68/72 for SRP RNA-Fl was unaffected by the presence of SRP9/14, and hence the binding of the heterodimers to SRP RNA is noncooperative in the absence of SRP54 and SRP19. The SRP protein heterodimers therefore associate randomly and independently with SRP RNA to form domains in the particle that are distinct both structurally and functionally. Any cooperativity in SRP assembly would have to be mediated by SRP54 and/or SRP19.

Animals↗

Transient involvement of signal recognition particle and its receptor in the microsomal membrane prior to protein translocation.

We have shown that neither the signal recognition particle (SRP) nor the SRP receptor is directly involved in the maintenance of a ribosome-membrane junction for the translocation of secretory proteins. We found that the purified SRP receptor releases the signal-sequence-induced and SRP-mediated elongation arrest of synthesis by displacing SRP from the ribosome. This SRP displacement was not accompanied by binding of the SRP receptor to the ribosome. Using intact microsomal membranes as a source of the SRP receptor, we found that both SRP displacement and binding of the elongation-arrested ribosome to the membrane can occur at 0 degrees C, by a mechanism that is independent of chain elongation.

Animals↗

Visualizing induced fit in early assembly of the human signal recognition particle.

Assembly of almost all ribonucleoprotein complexes involves induced fit in the RNA and, thus, formation of one or more intermediate states. In assembly of the human signal recognition particle (SRP), we show that SRP19 binding to SRP RNA involves obligatory intermediates. An apparent discrepancy exists between the ratio of dissociation and association rate constants, determined in a partitioning experiment, and the equilibrium binding constant; this kinetic signature reflects formation of a stable intermediate in assembly of the ribonucleoprotein complex. Assembly intermediates were observed directly by time-resolved footprinting. SRP19 binds rapidly to SRP RNA to form an initial labile, but structurally specific, encounter complex involving both helices III and IV. Two subsequent steps of structural consolidation yield the native RNA-protein interface. SRP19 binding stabilizes helix IV in the region recognized by SRP54, consistent with protein-protein cooperativity mediated in part by mutual recognition of similar RNA structures. This mechanism illustrates principles general to ribonucleoprotein assembly reactions that rely on recruitment of architectural RNA binding proteins.

Allosteric Regulation↗

FtsY, the prokaryotic signal recognition particle receptor homologue, is essential for biogenesis of membrane proteins.

In mammalian cells, many secretory proteins are targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum co-translationally, by the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its receptor. In Escherichia coli, the targeting of secretory proteins to the inner membrane can be accomplished post-translationally. Unexpectedly, despite this variance, E. coli contains essential genes encoding Ffh and FtsY with a significant similarity to proteins of the eukaryotic SRP machinery. In this study, we investigated the possibility that the prokaryotic SRP-like machinery is involved in biogenesis of membrane proteins in E. coli. The data presented here demonstrate that the SRP-receptor homologue, FtsY, is indeed essential for expression of integral membrane proteins in E. coli, indicating that, in the case of this group of proteins, FtsY and the mammalian SRP receptor have similar functions.

Arabinose↗

Binding of signal recognition particle gives ribosome/nascent chain complexes a competitive advantage in endoplasmic reticulum membrane interaction.

Most secretory and membrane proteins are sorted by signal sequences to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane early during their synthesis. Targeting of the ribosome-nascent chain complex (RNC) involves the binding of the signal sequence to the signal recognition particle (SRP), followed by an interaction of ribosome-bound SRP with the SRP receptor. However, ribosomes can also independently bind to the ER translocation channel formed by the Sec61p complex. To explain the specificity of membrane targeting, it has therefore been proposed that nascent polypeptide-associated complex functions as a cytosolic inhibitor of signal sequence- and SRP-independent ribosome binding to the ER membrane. We report here that SRP-independent binding of RNCs to the ER membrane can occur in the presence of all cytosolic factors, including nascent polypeptide-associated complex. Nontranslating ribosomes competitively inhibit SRP-independent membrane binding of RNCs but have no effect when SRP is bound to the RNCs. The protective effect of SRP against ribosome competition depends on a functional signal sequence in the nascent chain and is also observed with reconstituted proteoliposomes containing only the Sec61p complex and the SRP receptor. We conclude that cytosolic factors do not prevent the membrane binding of ribosomes. Instead, specific ribosome targeting to the Sec61p complex is provided by the binding of SRP to RNCs, followed by an interaction with the SRP receptor, which gives RNC-SRP complexes a selective advantage in membrane targeting over nontranslating ribosomes.

Animals↗