PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Surgical Stapling”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome.

PURPOSE: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy may be associated with less pain and faster recovery than conventional hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing hemorrhoids. Therefore, the outcome of stapled hemorrhoidectomy was compared with that of diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in a randomized, controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty patients with third-degree hemorrhoids were randomly assigned to stapled hemorrhoidectomy (n = 30) or to diathermy hemorrhoidectomy in a day-case setting. Visual analog scale was used for postoperative pain scoring. Surgical and functional outcome was assessed at six weeks and one year after surgery. RESULTS: Operation time was a median of 21 (range, 11-59) minutes in the stapled group. 22 (range, 14-40) minutes in the diathermy group. Day-case surgery was successful in 24 patients (80 percent) in the stapled group vs. 29 patients (97 percent) in the diathermy group. Average pain in the stapled group was significantly lower than in the diathermy group (median, 1.8 (0.1-4.8) vs. 4.3 (1.4-6.2), 95 percent confidence interval difference medians, 1.15-3.85, P = 0.0002, Mann-Whitney U test) as was the average pain expected by the patients (median -2.7 (-0.15-0.8) vs. 0.006 (-4.05-0.5) respectively, 95 percent confidence interval difference medians, 0.5-3.55, P = 0.0018, Mann-Whitney U test). Postoperative morbidity and time off work were not significantly different between the diathermy and stapled groups. Seven treatment failures in the stapled group and one in the diathermy group necessitated other treatments at a later date. Patient satisfaction scores in the stapled and diathermy group were similar. Symptoms attributed to difficult rectal evacuation decreased significantly after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a significantly less painful operation than diathermy hemorrhoidectomy, but does not seem to offer significant advantages in terms of hospital stay or symptom control in the long term. Hemorrhoidectomy may improve symptoms of difficult rectal evacuation.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: To compare open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. DESIGN: Multicentre, prospective randomised trial. SETTING: Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Borås County Hospital and Orebro University Hospital, Sweden. POPULATION: Women with genuine stress urinary incontinence or mixed incontinence with a predominantly stress component were included, and were randomised to either open colposuspension (n= 120) or laparoscopic colposuspension (n= 120). METHODS: Women were randomised to open colposuspension with sutures or laparoscopic colposuspension with polypropylene mesh and staples. Anaesthesia/operation time, blood loss, complications and other related surgical parameters were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Objective and subjective cure rates from 48-hour frequency-volume chart, a 48-hour pad test and a subjective assessment of the woman's incontinence and quality of life performed one year after surgery. RESULTS: Objective and subjective cure rates were higher after open compared with laparoscopic colposuspension (P < 0.001). Quality of life was improved following surgery in both groups (P < 0.0001) and the improvement was significantly greater in the open colposuspension group (P < 0.05) with regard to physical activity. Performing an open colposuspension was less time consuming (P < 0.0001), resulted in more blood loss (P < 0.0001), longer catheterisation time (P < 0.01), greater risk of urinary retention (P < 0.01) and a longer hospital stay (P < 0.0001) compared with performing a laparoscopic colposuspension. The rate of serious complications was low in both groups. CONCLUSION: Open colposuspension had a higher objective and subjective cure rate one year after surgery but with a greater blood loss, greater risk of urinary retention and a longer hospital stay than laparoscopic colposuspension.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Removal of staples.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Humans↗
PubMed2001

Persistent foreign body sensation and pharyngeal pain due to retention of staples: an interesting sequelae of endoscopic stapling procedure.

The surgical treatment of a pharyngeal pouch with endoscopic stapling diverticulotomy is a relatively new concept. Long-term results and complications are yet to be fully studied. We describe a patient who developed persistent pharyngeal pain and foreign body sensation due to retention of a clump of staples at the cricopharyngeal sphincter. This complication has not been reported before. This case highlights the need for repeat endoscopy rather than a barium swallow X-ray if the patients are symptomatic after stapling procedures.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Radiographic findings of post-operative double stapled trans anal rectal resection (STARR) in patient with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS).

Longo's procedure of double stapled trans anal rectal resection (STARR) has been evocated as surgical treatment of the obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) in patients with rectal mucosal prolapse. The aim of this study was to investigate the post-interventional findings of this technique, to help radiologist in knowledge of the changed morphology of the rectal lumen, also in attempt to recognize some potential related complications.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Skin and fascia staple closure.

Skin stapling is the fastest method of closure for long skin incisions. In addition, clean-contaminated wounds closed by staples have a greater resistance to infections than wounds closed with suture. It is important to realize that staples are a particular modality of suturing live tissues and if used properly they add speed and precision to wound closure. Many skin staplers are available to the veterinary surgeon and most perform satisfactorily. Stapling may be economically feasible when the reduced cost of surgical time and anesthesia is considered.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Feasibility and outcome of endoscopic staple-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy for Zenker's diverticulum.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Endoscopic staple-assisted esophagodiverticulostomy (ESED) is a newly described method of surgically correcting Zenker's diverticulum. Initial reports on the ease and success of the surgery have been quite enthusiastic, making it seem the procedure of choice. We initiated the procedure in an algorithm of treatment of Zenker's diverticulum, to further explore the feasibility and outcome of this new technique. STUDY DESIGN: This is a case series of 23 patients with Zenker's diverticulum who have undergone surgical repair. For each patient, an attempt at ESED was made. If unsuccessful, an open approach was then taken. RESULTS: Seven of 23 patients (30%) were unable to be treated with ESED because of inability to expose the diverticulum or unfavorable anatomy of the diverticulum itself. Of the remaining 16 patients, ESED was successful in resolving the symptoms of diverticulum in 14 (87%). Two patients (13%) were somewhat improved but had persistent dysphagia. No significant complications occurred. All patients resumed oral diet within the first 24 hours after surgery. CONCLUSION: Esophagodiverticulostomy is an excellent method of surgically correcting Zenker's diverticulum in many patients, but anatomical considerations may prevent its use, making open approaches of continued importance in a surgeon's armamentarium.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Preperitoneal laparoscopic retropubic colposuspension in the treatment of stress incontinence: the mesh and tacker technique].

UNLABELLED: The Burch procedure has enjoyed in the last decade a favourable status among open surgical repairs for stress urinary incontinence. In the last few years this technique was adapted for endoscopic application. This results in decreased recovery time and diminished postoperative patients discomfort. This endoscopic procedure was further simplified by means of extraperitoneal approach and through the use of Mesh & Tacker technique. This enables a high quality durable colposuspension in significantly shortened operational time. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of preliminary results and experiences of the above-mentioned new laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach in the treatment of stress incontinence. SETTING: Department of Gynaecology and minimally invasive surgery Na Homolce Hospital. DESIGN: Prospective pilot study. METHODS: The patients with stress incontinence proven clinically and by means of urodynamic investigation (cystometry, stress profilometry and uroflowmetry) were included in the study. The Retzius space was dissected laparoscopically via preperitoneal distention balloon (PDB, Origin Medsystems). Colpofixation to Coopers ligaments was achieved by means of Mesh & Tacker technique, e.g. polypropylen Mesh and aplicator of helicose spirals (Origin Medsystems). RESULTS: In this pilot study of initial 8 patients we may conclude that the above-mentioned method is promising. Of note is shortened operational time (35 min), easy performance without necessity of laparoscopic endosuturing and minimal tissue damage. The small amount of patients and short follow up period would not allow definite conclusions but all the patients are sofar fully continent.

Adult↗