SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources

PubMed2007

Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Both advancing age and male gender are known predictors of adenomas and large adenomas at colonoscopy. However, the importance of endoscopist compared with both age and gender as predictors of adenomas is not known. In this study, we assessed the adenoma detection rates of nine endoscopists performing colonoscopy and the effects of endoscopist on adenoma detection compared with the established predictors of advancing age and male gender. METHODS: Consecutive colonoscopy reports by nine attending gastroenterologists at Indiana University Hospital between January 1999 and January 2004 were obtained. Patients with indications for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), inherited colon cancer syndromes, or who were referred for polypectomy were excluded. RESULTS: There were 10,034 included colonoscopies. The overall mean age (yr) +/- SD for the entire cohort was 56.0 +/- 13.5, range 14-93 yr. Multivariate analysis indicated that both advancing age and male gender were powerful predictors of adenomas, both for the overall cohort and in those >or=50 of age (P or=50 yr of age, the range of detection of at least one adenoma per colonoscopy by nine colonoscopists was 15.5-41.1%, at least two adenomas was 4.9-20.0%, at least three adenomas was 0.8-10.8%, and at least one adenoma >or=1.0 cm was 1.7-6.2%, and the range of adenomas detected per colonoscopy was 0.21-0.86. Differences between endoscopists were significant (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Who performs the procedure can be more important than age and gender in predicting adenomas at colonoscopy. Our results underscore the need to measure adenoma detection rates in the continuous quality improvement process and to report them to endoscopists. Additional data are needed to determine whether corrective measures can reduce variation in adenoma detection rates.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2004

Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study.

PROBLEM: A large audit of colonoscopy in the United Kingdom showed that the unadjusted completion rate was 57% when stringent criteria for identifying the caecum were applied. The caecum should be reached 90% of the time. Little information is available on what units or operators need to do to improve to acceptable levels. DESIGN: Quality improvement programme using two completed cycles of audit. SETTING: Endoscopy department in a university linked general hospital in northeast England. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Colonoscopy completion rate. STRATEGY FOR CHANGE: Two audit cycles were completed between 1999 and 2002. Changes to practice were based on results of audit and took into account the opinions of relevant staff. Lack of time for each colonoscopy, poor bowel preparation, especially in frail patients, and a mismatch between number of colonoscopies done and completion rate for individual operators were responsible for failed colonoscopies. Appropriate changes were made. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: The initial crude colonoscopy completion rate was 60%, improving to 71% after the first round of audit and 88% after the second round, which approximates to the agreed audit standard of 90%. The final adjusted completion rate was 94%. LESSONS LEARNT: Achievement of the national targets in a UK general hospital is possible by lengthening appointments, admitting frail patients for bowel preparation to one ward, and allocating colonoscopies to the most successful operators.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed2005

Interval faecal occult blood testing in a colonoscopy based screening programme detects additional pathology.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopic based surveillance is recommended for patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer. The appropriate interval between surveillance colonoscopies remains in debate, as is the "miss rate" for colorectal cancer within such screening programmes. AIMS: The main aim of this study was to determine whether a one-off interval faecal occult blood test (FOBT) facilitates the detection of significant neoplasia within a colonoscopic based surveillance programme. Secondary aims were to determine if invitees were interested in participating in interval screening, and to determine whether interval lesions were missed or whether they developed rapidly since the previous colonoscopy PATIENTS: Patients enrolled in a colonoscopic based screening programme due to a personal history of colorectal neoplasia or a significant family history. METHODS: Patients within the screening programme were invited to perform an immunochemical FOBT (Inform). A positive result was followed by colonoscopy; significant neoplasia was defined as colorectal cancer, adenomas either > or =10 mm or with a villous component, high grade dysplasia, or multiplicity (>/=3 adenomas). Participation rates were determined for age, sex, and socioeconomic subgroups. Colonoscopy recall databases were examined to determine the interval between previous colonoscopy and FOBT offer, and correlations between lesion characteristics and interval time were determined. RESULTS: A total of 785 of 1641 patients invited (47.8%) completed an Inform kit. A positive result was recorded for 57 (7.3%). Fifty two of the 57 test positive patients completed colonoscopy; 14 (1.8% of those completing the FOBT) had a significant neoplastic lesion. These consisted of six colorectal cancers and eight significant adenomas. CONCLUSIONS: A one off immunochemical faecal occult blood test within a colonoscopy based surveillance programme had a participation rate of nearly 50% and appeared to detect additional pathology, especially in patients with a past history of colonic neoplasia.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: Discrimination between neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions is crucial in colorectal cancer screening. Application of narrow-band imaging (NBI) in colonoscopy visualises mucosal vascular networks in neoplastic lesions and may improve diagnostic accuracy. AIM: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of NBI in differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions with diagnostic efficacies of standard modalities, conventional colonoscopy, and chromoendoscopy. METHODS: In this prospective study, 180 colorectal lesions from 133 patients were observed with conventional colonoscopy, and under low-magnification and high-magnification NBI and chromoendoscopy. Lesions were resected for histopathological analysis. Endoscopic images were stored electronically and randomly allocated to two readers for evaluation. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of each endoscopic modality were assessed by reference to histopathology. RESULTS: NBI and chromoendoscopy scored better under high magnification than under low magnification in comparison with conventional colonoscopy. The diagnostic accuracy of NBI with low or high magnification was significantly higher than that of conventional colonoscopy (low magnification: p = 0.0434 for reader 1 and p = 0.004 for reader 2; high magnification: p<0.001 for both readers) and was comparable to that of chromoendoscopy. CONCLUSION: Both low-magnification and high-magnification NBI were capable of distinguishing neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions; the diagnostic accuracy of NBI was better than that of conventional colonoscopy and equivalent to that of chromoendoscopy. The role of NBI in screening colonoscopy needs further evaluation.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1987

Screening by colonoscopy for colonic epithelial dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease.

We report the results of a prospective study of screening for colorectal epithelial dysplasia by regular colonoscopy in patients with longstanding, extensive colitis (DET group: 112 patients, 366 colonoscopies) together with the findings in all other patients with colitis who have undergone colonoscopy in our unit (non-DET group: 77 patients, 196 colonoscopies). Thirty six DET patients had dysplasia on at least one examination: two patients with high grade dysplasia (HGD) were colonoscoped on suspicion of carcinoma, one asymptomatic patient had HGD at first colonoscopy and one patient had HGD on his sixth colonoscopy, all having carcinomas resected at surgery; the remainder had low grade dysplasia (LGD). Of the DET patients, 100 constituted an ongoing surveillance group (354 colonoscopies) in which LGD was common, being seen on at least one occasion in 33% of patients (16.4% of examinations), but HGD was noted only once with a Dukes A cancer found at surgery. Six non-DET patients had dysplasia diagnosed, this being LGD in all. Even in a carefully selected group of colitics the incidence of HGD is low, but its detection may enable the removal of a colorectal carcinoma at an early and curable stage.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate short- and midterm patient preference of computed tomographic (CT) colonography relative to colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer and to elucidate determinants of preference. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer underwent CT colonography prior to scheduled colonoscopy. Patient experience and preference were assessed both directly after the examinations and 5 weeks after the examinations. Differences in pain, embarrassment, discomfort, and preference were assessed with the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test or a binomial test. Potential determinants of preference were investigated with logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Data for 249 patients were included. Fewer patients experienced severe or extreme pain during CT colonography (seven [3%] of 245) than during colonoscopy (81 [34%] of 241) (P < .001). Directly after both examinations, 168 (71%) of 236 patients preferred CT colonography; 5 weeks later, 141 (61%) of 233 patients preferred CT colonography (P < .001). Initially, a painful colonoscopy examination (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08, 0.38) was a determinant of CT colonography preference. Similarly, a painful (odds ratio, 3.70; 95% CI: 1.54, 8.92) or an embarrassing (odds ratio, 4.46; 95% CI: 1.18, 16.88) CT colonography examination was a determinant of colonoscopy preference. After 5 weeks, the presence of polyps emerged as a determinant of colonoscopy preference (odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI: 1.02, 3.70), while the role of experiences waned. CONCLUSION: Patients preferred CT colonography to colonoscopy; however, this preference decreased in time, while outcome considerations gradually replaced temporary experiences of inconvenience.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

Trends in use of barium enema examination, colonoscopy, and sigmoidoscopy: is use commensurate with risk of disease?

PURPOSE: To assess replacement of barium enema examination with colonoscopy in relation to age- and sex-related risk factors, place of service, physician specialty, and cost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1985 and 1992, 894,777 insurance claims for barium enema examination and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy were retrospectively examined. Changes in use were investigated. Use of proctosigmoidoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy, two office-based endoscopic procedures, was also examined. RESULTS: Use of diagnostic colonoscopy increased from 191 to 406 services per 100,000 persons; colonoscopy with biopsy, from 77 to 183 services; and colonoscopy with lesion removal, from 77 to 202 services. Barium enema examination use declined from 929 to 511 services per 100,000 persons; diagnostic proctosigmoidoscopy, from 854 to 193 services; and diagnostic flexible sigmoidoscopy, from 656 to 620 services. Increases in use of colonoscopy in patients aged younger than 40 years were greater than overall increases. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy has been replacing barium enema examination as the initial colorectal examination since 1985. Increased use of colonoscopy in patients with lower risk of neoplasia suggests that indications have become overly broad.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

[Diagnostic value of fecal calprotectin in predicting an abnormal colonoscopy].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Abdominal pain and diarrhoea are common symptoms in the general population. The colonoscopy is the gold standard method of detecting an organic pathology in the colon. However, it is invasive; it can not be repeated frecuently; it is expensive; and the system is overloaded. Fecal calprotectin (FCP) is a marker that may detect organic pathologies of the colon. The aims of this study were to analyze the usefulness of FCP to predict an abnormal colonoscopy and to correlate the levels of FCP with the degree of activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). PATIENTS AND METHOD: 190 people were included in the study. All of them underwent a colonoscopy and a stool sample. People were divided in: normal colonoscopy: 117 people, and 28 colon adenomas, 20 colorectal cancer (CRC) and 25 IBD. RESULTS: The mean (SD) FCP concentration was 2,171.1 (2,133.6) mg/kgin patients with IBD and 726.6 mg/kg (533) in CRC. Both results were significantly elevated compared with those of healthy controls [114 (113)] mg/kg In patients with IBD, their levels correlated directly with the activity of the inflammation. 217 mg/kg was the best cut-off for discriminating patients with organic colon disorders. The sensibility was 85% and NPV was 93%. NSAIDs use was a clinical variable which was connected with a high FCP concentration in patients with normal colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: The higher levels of FCP were found in people with IBD and CRC. The measurement of FCP is a non-invasive, inexpensive, reliable and easily measured test. Among people with abdominal pain and diarrhoea, testing for FCP allows us to select those who must undergo a colonoscopy. NSAIDs can raise the levels of FCP in people with normal colonoscopies.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Analysis of urgent colonoscopy for lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Three hundred and forty-five patients who underwent urgent colonoscopy for acute hematochezia during the past 20 years (from 1976 to 1995) were retrospectively analyzed. METHODS: Urgent colonoscopy was defined as endoscopy performed within 24 h after a bleeding episode. Preparation was initially minimal with a water or glycerine enema. Recently, however, polyethylene glycol is used. RESULTS: The overall diagnostic accuracy for bleeding site detection was 89.1% (307 cases). Successful insertion was made to the ileocecal region in 193 cases (55.9%). The disease most frequently discoverd by urgent colonoscopy was transient ischemic colitis (62 cases). Negative urgent colonoscopy specimens (18 cases) were later diagnosed by other methods as being small intestinal bleeding foci. In 10 cases, initial colonoscopy failed to detect the bleeding foci. Endoscopic hemostasis was performed in 48 cases. Permanent hemostasis succeeded in 32 cases (66.7%). Complications of urgent colonoscopy were fever after the examination (22 cases) and hypotension during endoscopy (7 cases). CONCLUSION: Urgent colonoscopy is considered to be a safe and useful examination for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding and hemostasis.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2001

Validation of virtual colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps and masses: rationale for proper study design.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer, the second-leading cause of cancer-related mortality, is a preventable malignancy in many cases. Despite the availability of several screening modalities, compliance with screening recommendations remains unacceptably low. Virtual colonoscopy is a novel, minimally-invasive technique with the potential to increase colorectal cancer screening rates, but its effectiveness must first be validated. Published studies comparing virtual colonoscopy to conventional colonoscopy have reported varying results. These discrepancies may be attributed to differences in bowel preparation and scanning techniques, as well as errors in endoscopic lesion measurement, endoscopic colonic segmental localization, and the ability of conventional colonoscopy to actually detect lesions. These methodological issues can affect scientific results and ultimately affect the public's perception of this emerging technique. AIM: The goal of this report is to expose existing methodological shortcomings and propose solutions incorporated in this study design. This article describes the rationale, study design, and outcome definitions of a single-center, blinded, direct comparative trial aiming at assessing the ability of virtual colonoscopy to detect colorectal polyps and masses relative to the criterion standard, conventional colonoscopy. DESIGN FEATURES: Bowel preparation was standardized using oral sodium phosphate lavage, orally administered iodinated contrast, and controlled colonic insufflation. Segmental unblinding allowed a second-look when results were discrepant and polyp matching was performed using an algorithm based on segmental localization and lesion size determination. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology could be applied to other studies assessing the accuracy of virtual colonoscopy in order to have uniformity of results.

Colonic Polyps↗

PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness of computerized tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening.

BACKGROUND: Computerized tomographic (CT) colonography is a potential alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Its main advantage, a better safety profile, may be offset by its limitations: lower sensitivity, need for colonoscopy in cases where results are positive, and expense. METHODS: We performed an economic evaluation, using decision analysis, to compare CT colonography with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in patients over 50 years of age. Three-year outcomes included number of colonoscopies, perforations and adenomas removed; deaths from perforation and from colorectal cancer from missed adenomas; and direct health care costs. The expected prevalence of adenomas, test performance characteristics of CT colonography and colonoscopy, and probability of colonoscopy complications and cancer from missed adenomas were derived from the literature. Costs were determined in detail locally. RESULTS: Using the base-case assumptions, a strategy of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening would cost 2.27 million dollars extra per 100,000 patients screened; 3.78 perforation-related deaths would be avoided, but 4.11 extra deaths would occur from missed adenomas. Because screening with CT colonography would cost more and result in more deaths overall compared with colonoscopy, the latter remained the dominant strategy. Our results were sensitive to CT colonography's test performance characteristics, the malignant risk of missed adenomas, the risk of perforation and related death, the procedural costs and differences in screening adherence. INTERPRETATION: At present, CT colonography cannot be recommended as a primary means of population-based colorectal cancer screening in Canada.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Applying evidence-based guidelines improves use of colonoscopy resources in patients with a moderate risk of colorectal neoplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether applying National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines for colorectal cancer prevention would reduce the number of follow-up colonoscopies. DESIGN: A prospective audit of colonoscopic surveillance decisions before and after the intervention. SETTING: The endoscopy suite at a metropolitan tertiary hospital three months before and after January 2000. INTERVENTION: Dissemination of NHMRC guidelines, and supervision of application of the guidelines by a nurse coordinator. SUBJECTS: We compared colonoscopic surveillance decisions before and after the intervention in two groups of 100 consecutive patients after polypectomy and in two groups of 50 consecutive patients with a family history of colorectal cancer after a normal colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in concordance of decisions with NHMRC guidelines; and effect on number of follow-up colonoscopies. RESULTS: After the intervention, the proportion of postpolypectomy surveillance decisions matching the guidelines increased from 37% to 96% (P < 0.05). The mean time to repeat colonoscopy after polypectomy increased from 2.7 to 3.5 years (P < 0.005) (ie, a 23% reduction in the number of postpolypectomy surveillance colonoscopies performed per year). Likewise, the proportion of family-history surveillance decisions matching the guidelines increased from 63% to 96%. Adhering to the guidelines resulted in a 17% reduction in colonoscopies performed on the basis of a family history of colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised application of evidence-based guidelines to a colorectal cancer surveillance program significantly reduces the number of surveillance colonoscopies performed.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1999

[Colonoscopy with computed tomography with volume reconstruction. The results and a comparison with endoscopy and surgery].

PURPOSE: Virtual CT colonoscopy is a novel technique whose diagnostic accuracy and clinical yield are currently investigated. Several studies have shown its capabilities in detecting colon and rectal cancers. We report the results of a preliminary experience with the volume rendering technique and compare CT colonoscopy with endoscopy and surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series consisted of 25 patients with colon cancer confirmed at endoscopy and/or surgery. All examinations were carried out with a spiral CT scanner Philips Tomoscan AVE1. Intestinal preparation was adequate in all patients, consisting in gas insufflated immediately before acquisition, after the injection of 100 mL iodinated contrast agent. All examination were performed in prone position using axial 5 mm slices with 5 mm table feed (pitch 1) and 2 mm reconstruction index; 120 kV and 200-250 mA were used. Images were transferred to a workstation (Easy Vision, Philips, release 4.2.1.1) for processing. We acquired multiplanar (MPR) and virtual endoscopic images with volume rendering; the selected threshold was -250 to -600 Hounsfield Units. Virtual endoscopic images could be obtained in 23 of 25 cases. The results of the radiological study were compared with endoscopic and surgical findings in 25 and 17 cases, respectively. RESULTS: Endoscopy and surgery detected 46 lesions: 29 were malignant and 17 benign. Axial CT and MPR alone detected 35 lesions (76%), 29 of them malignant and 6 benign. The 11 benign lesions missed by axial CT ranged 6-8 mm in diameter. There were no false positives. CT colonoscopy alone detected 66 lesions, but 22 of them were false positive due to residual stool in the colon (21 cases) and to residual barium in the colon (1 case). Combining CT colonoscopy and axial and MPR images enabled to correct the false positive diagnoses made by CT colonoscopy alone and to decrease the false negative ratio of axial and MPR images. Forty-one of 44 lesions (93%) were detected. Thirty-seven lesions were found in the 17 surgical patients; 34 of them were correctly identified combining CT colonoscopy and axial and MPR findings, while endoscopy detected only 31 lesions. Thus, CT had 92% sensitivity, versus 83% of fiberoptic endoscopy. CONCLUSION: In this preliminary experience volume rendering CT colonoscopy exhibited high sensitivity in detecting colon cancers, but their correct evaluation and characterization can be obtained if axial and MPR studies are combined. Further investigation and technological developments are necessary to define the yield of this new technique.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2003

[Appropiateness of colonoscopy in a gastrointestinal unit in 2001: a prospective study using criteria established by a European panel of experts].

UNLABELLED: Criteria for appropriateness of colonoscopy have been elaborated by an European Panel (EPAGE). OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the feasibility of EPAGE criteria in clinical practice, 2) to assess colonoscopy appropriateness using EPAGE criteria, 3) to compare colonoscopy appropriateness and findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred and six consecutive examinations were included. The referral indication was judged using a scoring system on the basis of the EPAGE criteria. RESULTS: Appropriateness could be assessed in 94% of the colonoscopies. Fifty-four percent were appropriate, 40% equivocal, and 6% inappropriate. Rate of abnormal colonoscopy was not different between the 3 groups, however endoscopic findings were more severe when the indication was appropriate. In the appropriate group, adenomatous polyps were more frequent (24%) than in the two other groups (13% and 12%; P<0.05) and tended to be larger in size. In the inappropriate group, patients were significantly younger, and no cancer was found. There were 5 colonic cancers in the inappropriate group and 12 in the appropriate group. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy is generally not overused according to EPAGE guidelines. However, on an individual basis it could be rather difficult to determine colonoscopy appropriateness using a scoring system. Indeed, a third of the indications was judged equivocal and the endoscopic findings were no different whether indication was appropriate or equivocal.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Abdominal tuberculosis: diagnosis by laparoscopy and colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Histopathological confirmation in abdominal tuberculosis is difficult due to suboptimal noninvasive access to the involved area. Peritoneoscopy and colonoscopy provide semi-invasive access to the peritoneum, large intestine and ileocecal area. Information on the diagnostic yield of these two investigation in abdominal tuberculosis is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of laparoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and July 2001, 34 patients were diagnosed to have abdominal tuberculosis on the basis of laparoscopy or colonoscopy. The case records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed to assess the usefulness of laparoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. RESULTS: Laparoscopy was performed in 23 patients. Peritoneal tuberculosis was diagnosed in 19 of them, characterized by presence of ascites, multiple whitish tubercles, fibrous bands and adhesions, hyperaemic edematous bowel loops or dense adhesions without ascites. Multiple jejunoileal hyperemic short segments with serosal neovascularization was noticed in three patients. One patient had cecal mass with pericecal inflammatory adhesions. In three patients, laparoscopy was converted to open laparotomy due to bowel injury, extensive adhesions, and difficulty in assessing lymph nodal mass in one patient each. Peritoneal biopsy confirmed the diagnosis in 10 of the 15 (67%) patients. In one patient pericecal tissue biopsy confirmed the diagnosis. The remaining patients received therapeutic trial with anti tuberculosis treatment. All patients showed good response. Thus laparoscopy provided positive diagnosis of tuberculosis in 20/23 (87%) and positive histology in 10 of the 15 (67%) patients with peritoneal lesions. Thirteen patients underwent colonoscopy. Mucosal lesions involving terminal ileum, cecum and colon was noted in 11 patients. Colonoscopic biopsy confirmed the diagnosis in six of the 11 patients (54%). Non of these patients had any complication related to colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy was safe and helped in the diagnosis of peritoneal as well as intestinal tuberculosis in 87% of patients. Colonoscopy is useful for colonic and terminal ileal lesion with a positive diagnostic yield of 54%.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Remifentanil/midazolam versus tramadol/midazolam use for colonoscopy.

One of the most commonly performed outpatient procedure is colonoscopy. The pain and anxiety is frequently associated with colonoscopy. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of remifentanil/midazolam, and tramadol/midazolam for iv sedation and analgesia during colonoscopy. Twentysix patients (age range 18-65 years) scheduled for ambulatory colonoscopy were included to study. All patients received midazolam 1 mg intravenous. After two minutes in Group R (remifentanil/midazolam, n=18) remifentanil bolus (10 microg) and infusion 0.03 microg kg(-1) min(-1) were administered until adequate sedation level was achieved. In Group T (tramadol/midazolam, n=18) iv tramadol 50 mg was given concurrently. During procedure 2 L/min oxygen was supplemented via face mask to all patients. Haemodynamic variables, respiratory depression, level of sedation, postoperative recovery, patient and gastroenterologist satisfaction were surveyed. Patients were asked to verbally rate their level of pain, on an 10-point numerical rating scale (1=no pain, 10=severe pain). Chi-square, student t test, and mann whitney U test were used for statistical analysis. Colonoscopy was carried out successfully in all patients. There were no episodes of desaturation or airway compromise. Haemodynamic parameters were similar in both groups. Sistolic arterial and diastolic arterial pressures were increased at 10 and 15 minutes in all patients (P<0.05). There were no significant changes in heart rate in both groups. The level of sedation in group R was higher than group T during colonoscopy. The patients in group T had higher pain scores. Gastroenterologist satisfaction and patient satisfaction were similar in both groups. Our results suggests that, sedoanalgesia with midazolam/remifentanil may be an alternative to sedoanalgesia with midazolam/tramadol for colonoscopy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Colonoscopy procedures at a small rural hospital.

BACKGROUND: Screening for colon cancer by colonoscopy is increasingly recommended in the medical literature. There are few, if any, reports in the medical literature regarding the provision of colonoscopy services in small rural hospitals by non-specialist endoscopists. OBJECTIVE: This study, carried out in a small rural hospital in northern Ontario, tracks the development of a colonoscopy service provided by a general practitioner with some basic colonoscopy training. It compares the GP's past and present level of expertise with literature-derived benchmarks and gauges the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 616 colonoscopies performed by this GP between April 1992 and September 2003. RESULTS: The results of the study support the idea that colonoscopy in a rural setting can be provided safely and effectively. CONCLUSION: Colonoscopy has a high safety profile when provided by general practitioners, and training in the procedure should be available to interested family practitioners and family practice residents.

Aged↗

PubMed1990

Diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma--is colonoscopy superior to barium enema?

From January 1984 to December 1987, 520 pathologically proved cases of colorectal carcinomas were treated in Mackay Memorial Hospital - 272 (52.5%) were male and 248 (47.7%) were female. The distribution of carcinomas in the colorectum were caecum 27 (5%), ascending colon 49 (9.1%), transverse colon 70 (13%), descending colon 41 (7.6%), sigmoid colon 93 (17.3%), rectosigmoid colon 19 (3.5%) and rectum 239 (44.4%). Fourteen cases (3.3%) had double carcinomas. When 334 barium enema examinations (210 single contrast, 124 double contrast) and 207 colonoscopies were done, false negative results were found in 31 (14.76%) single contrast barium enema (BaE-S) and eight (6.45%) in double contrast barium enema (BaE-D) examinations, and 7 (3.38%) colonoscopic examinations failed to demonstrate cancer lesions because of incomplete examinations from technical problems. False negative in BaE were mostly due to failure to recognize or misinterpret the lesions especially in the rectum. Colonoscopy is significantly more accurate than BaE-S but not with BaE-D. BaE especially BaE-D can be complementary to colonoscopy in a nearly obstructing colon. Direct biopsy of the lesion makes colonoscopy more useful than BaE. Complete removal of a malignant polyp turns colonoscopy into a therapeutic modality. However, a well-trained endoscopist is essential in making colonoscopy a less suffering and more accurate examination. In a symptomatic patient, a confirmatory examination is always needed after positive BaE finding. Sometimes this can be avoided by having colonoscopy done first.

Adult↗