PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Conditioning, Operant”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Effects of operantly conditioning the amplitude of the P200 peak of the SEP on pain sensitivity and the spinal nociceptive withdrawal reflex in humans.

This study attempted to replicate and extend earlier work that reported that the amplitude of the P200 peak of the human somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) can be increased and decreased when reward is made contingent upon change and that these changes are accompanied by alterations in pain sensitivity. Twenty-one subjects were able to make the amplitude of the P200 peak evoked by sural nerve stimulation larger during increased training (up-training) than during decreased training (down-training). There were no differences in the sural nerve compound action potential between up-training and down-training. This finding demonstrates that the change in P200 amplitude was not due to a change in stimulus efficacy, but rather to a change within the central nervous system. Subjective pain ratings and a nociceptive spinal reflex were the same in up-training as in down-training. Thus, conditioned changes in P200 amplitude do not alter pain sensitivity.

Action Potentials↗
PubMed1979

EEG operant conditioning for control of epilepsy.

We report the results of 23 severely epileptic patients who were given EEG feedback training. The paradigm reinforced the patients' 18 Hz activity over the scalp approximation of their focus while suppressing temporalis EMG and low frequency EEG activity. In contrast to other studies using EEG feedback, only 43% of patients showed significant changes in seizure occurrence and a lesser number were felt to have benefited clinically. None of our neuropsychological test parameters were helpful in identifying (prospectively or retrospectively) patients most likely to respond to this treatment. Although a few patients were significantly helped by this training, the mechanism for this effect is unclear.

Adolescent↗