PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nerve Block”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Femoral nerve block and ketorolac in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The primary objective was to evaluate the analgesic effectiveness of femoral nerve block and ketorolac following ACL reconstruction. The secondary objective was to examine their effects on recovery milestones. METHODS: Prior to standard general anesthesia, 90 patients were randomized into three groups of preoperative treatment: 1) femoral nerve block (15 mL bupivacaine 0.5%) and 1 mL normal saline i.v. (FNB group); 2) placebo femoral nerve block (15 mL normal saline) and 30 mg (1 mL) ketorolac i.v. (KT group); 3) placebo femoral nerve block (15 mL normal saline) and 1 mL normal saline i.v. (PL group). Postoperatively, pain was assessed by visual analogue score, demand and consumption of morphine via patient-controlled analgesia pump. The times for patients to tolerate oral fluid, food, sit up, ambulate and void were also noted. RESULTS: Morphine consumption within one hour, three hours and until POD 1 in the FNB group was lower than the PL group (7 +/- 6, 11 +/- 9, 27 +/- 23 mg vs 13 +/- 5, 20 +/- 9, 49 +/- 28 mg respectively), whereas only that within one hour in the KT group was lower than the PL group. Pain score was lower in FNB and KT groups in the first postoperative hour than in the PL group (P < 0.05). There were no differences among the three groups in the times to meet recovery milestone and discharge criteria. CONCLUSION: Femoral nerve block provides superior analgesia than placebo for ACL reconstruction but was insufficient to facilitate early recovery.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

CT-guided obturator nerve block via the posterior approach.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique of obturator nerve block under CT guidance via the posterior approach, and to evaluate the efficacy of the procedure in the short-term and mid-term relief of chronic hip pain. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Consecutive patients referred for obturator nerve block were prospectively enrolled in this study. Under CT-guidance, via a posterior approach through the pelvis, local anaesthetic and steroid were infiltrated around the obturator nerve using a 22G spinal needle. Fifty-one patients (19 male, 32 female), mean age 54 years, with hip pain refractory to conventional therapy underwent the procedure. Visual Analogue Scale pain scores were recorded before the procedure and at 30 minutes, 24 hours, 1 week and 3 months thereafter. RESULTS: Pain scores within 30 minutes showed a decrease from a mean +/- SD score of 8.41+/-1.22 pre-procedure to 2.86+/-2.1, p<0.001. At 24 hours, the mean pain score was 2.06+/-1.76, a decrease of 76% from pre-procedural score, p<0.001. Sustained pain relief at 1 week and 3 months was attained in 92% (mean pain score 2.41+/-2.2, p<0.001) and 82% (mean pain score 3.80+/-2.94, p<0.001) of cases respectively. Follow-up data was complete for all 51 patients. No serious side-effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with hip pain refractory to conventional pain control measures, CT-guided obturator nerve block can provide relief from pain in the short to medium term. The posterior approach offers safe, reliable and effective access to the nerve, in a procedure which is well-tolerated by the patient.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed1999

Anatomical landmarks for femoral nerve block: a comparison of four needle insertion sites.

UNLABELLED: The site for needle insertion in femoral nerve block varies significantly among various descriptions of the technique. To determine the site with the highest likelihood of needle-femoral nerve contact, femoral nerve block was simulated in a human cadaver model (17 femoral triangles from 9 adult cadavers). Four 20-gauge 50-mm-long styletted catheters were inserted at four frequently suggested insertion sites for femoral nerve block. At the levels of inguinal ligament and the inguinal crease, the catheters were inserted adjacent to the lateral border of the femoral artery and 2 cm lateral to the femoral artery. During anatomical dissection, we studied the number of catheter-nerve contacts for each of the four insertion sites, and relationships between the femoral nerve and other anatomical structures of relevance to femoral nerve block. Insertion of the needle at the level of the inguinal crease, next to the lateral border of the femoral artery resulted in the highest frequency of needle-femoral nerve contacts (71%). Of note, the femoral nerve was significantly wider (14.0 vs 9.8 mm) and closer to the fascia lata (6.8 vs 26.4 mm) at the inguinal crease than at the inguinal ligament level. We conclude that needle insertion at the inguinal crease level immediately adjacent to the femoral artery produced the highest rate of needle-femoral nerve contacts. The main factors influencing this result include the greater width of the femoral nerve and the more predictable femoral artery-femoral nerve relationship at the inguinal crease level, compared with the inguinal ligament level. IMPLICATIONS: Insertion of a needle at the inguinal crease level and immediately adjacent to the lateral border of the femoral artery results in a high rate of needle-femoral nerve contact.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

For outpatient rotator cuff surgery, nerve block anesthesia provides superior same-day recovery over general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Both general and nerve block anesthesia are effective for shoulder surgery. For outpatient surgery, it is important to determine which technique provides more efficient recovery. The authors' goal was to compare nerve block with general anesthesia with respect to recovery profile and patient satisfaction after rotator cuff surgery. METHODS: In this clinical trial, 50 consenting outpatients (aged 18-70 yr) were randomly assigned to receive either fast-track general anesthesia followed by bupivacaine (0.25%) wound infiltration or interscalene brachial plexus block (0.75% ropivacaine), each under standardized protocols. Blinded recovery room nurses assessed the need for pain treatment and rated patient eligibility for bypass of the phase 1 postanesthesia care unit and for discharge home. Patients were followed up for 2 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome measures were postanesthesia care unit bypass and same-day discharge. Other same-day recovery outcomes included severity of and treatment for pain and time to ambulation. Postoperative outcomes at home included satisfaction with the anesthesia technique and absence of complications (at 2 weeks). RESULTS: Patients who received nerve block (vs. general anesthesia) bypassed the postanesthesia care unit more frequently (76 vs. 16%; P < 0.001), reported less pain, ambulated earlier, were ready for home discharge sooner (123 vs. 286 min; P < 0.001), had no unplanned hospital admissions (vs. 4 of 25 patients who underwent general anesthesia; P = 0.05), and were more satisfied with their care. No complications were reported in either treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: Nerve block anesthesia for outpatient rotator cuff surgery provides several same-day recovery advantages over general anesthesia.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Percutaneous maxillary nerve block anesthesia in maxillofacial surgery].

BACKGROUND: Personal experience in percutaneous maxillary nerve block anesthesia in association with transmucosal anesthesia of the sphenopalatine ganglion in oral and maxillofacial surgery, is presented. METHODS: Six Caldwell-Luc, 9 anthrotomies and biopsies of maxillary sinus, 8 removals of extensive odontogenic cysts and 12 surgical maxillary expansions were performed from 1994 to 1996 at our Department. Maxillary transcutaneous nerve block in association with transmucosal anesthesia of the sphenopalatine ganglion were performed. Carbocaine without adrenaline in association with NaCO3 1/10 for maxillary nerve block anesthesia and lidocaineoprilocaine cream (EMLA) for transmucosal anesthesia were employed. Intra- and post-operative pain were evaluated by visual analogue scale in all the patients. RESULTS: Anesthesiological procedures revealed to be effective in all surgical interventions and postoperative analgesia allowed easier pain control. CONCLUSIONS: The simplicity of execution, the effective pre- and postoperative anesthesia and the absence of side effects make this procedure particularly indicated in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Anesthesia, Dental↗
PubMed2002

Continuous mandibular nerve block for pain relief. A report of two cases.

PURPOSE: Mandibular nerve block allows surgery to be performed on the mandible. However, pain in the postoperative period needs to be treated with opioids or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents which have undesirable side effects. We examine the feasibility of continuous mandibular nerve block with 0.25% bupivacaine top-ups using a catheter for intraoperative and postoperative pain relief in two patients with a fracture of the mandible. METHODS: Using the lateral extraoral approach, the mandibular nerve was approached with an 18-gauge indwelling iv cannula in two patients undergoing repair of a fractured mandible under general anesthesia. After removing the needle, an 18-gauge epidural catheter was inserted into the cannula which was then removed. The catheter was tunnelled subcutaneously to emerge at the lateral aspect of the forehead. Two to 4 mL bupivacaine 0.25% were injected on a 12-hr basis and the catheter was kept in place for seven days. RESULTS: Both patients had excellent pain relief and no parenteral or oral analgesics were required throughout the postoperative period. No side effects were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous mandibular nerve block with 2-4 mL 0.25% bupivacaine top-ups injected twice a day through a catheter provides excellent pain relief in patients with a fracture of the mandible. This method may have implications for the management of pain of other etiology in the mandibular region.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Continuous peripheral nerve block for ambulatory surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB) can provide surgical anesthesia, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and acceptable side effects. Despite these advantages, CPNB is not in widespread use. Recently a new CPNB catheter system (Contiplex, B. Braun, Bethlehem, PA) was developed based on an insulated Tuohy needle, which allows for injection of local anesthetic and catheter insertion without disconnection or needle movement. At present, no clinical studies exist describing this system. METHODS: Data were prospectively gathered for 1 year from 228 patients in an ambulatory surgery center. All CPNB were performed using the Contiplex system to provide anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. CPNB were performed using 5 upper and lower extremity techniques. Postsurgery local anesthetic was infused and at 24 hours, a rebolus of local anesthetic was performed. The CPNB catheter was removed and patients were examined for loss of sensation. Patients were then discharged. RESULTS: Initial peripheral block was successful in 94% of patients. Failed nerve block requiring general anesthesia occurred in 6%. The catheter was patent and functional in 90% of patients at 24 hours, and 8% of patients required more than 10 mg of intravenous morphine by 24 hours postsurgery. In the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), only 4 patients (1.7%) required treatment for nausea. At 24 hours and 7 days postsurgery, no patient reported a dysesthesia. CONCLUSIONS: CPNB using the insulated Tuohy catheter system offered acceptable anesthesia and prolonged pain relief postsurgery. There were few side effects. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001;26:209-214.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Perioperative pain management of a complex orthopedic surgical procedure with double continuous nerve blocks in a burned child.

UNLABELLED: The use of catheters for continuous nerve blocks has been established in children, although in most series only one catheter was used. We report a case of a 3-yr-old child who underwent a toe-to-finger transfer managed with 2 regional catheters: axillary and sciatic. A pain score of 0 was noted during the entire study period. The total dose of bupivacaine was limited to an acceptable range, and the child recovered completely. This report adds to growing evidence in favor of the safety and efficacy of continuous peripheral nerve blocks in pediatric patients. IMPLICATIONS: Double continuous nerve blocks allow optimal analgesia in burned children after complex orthopedic surgery without major adverse events. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine remained small during the study period.

Bupivacaine↗
PubMed1993

Local anaesthesia for eye surgery without a facial nerve block.

Traditionally, local anaesthesia for cataract surgery requires retrobulbar blockade to be supplemented with a facial nerve block in order to prevent blepharospasm. In this study retrobulbar block using a larger volume of local anaesthetic without facial nerve block is compared with the combined technique in 50 patients. The adequacy of the two techniques was assessed by the surgeon according to eye motility (in four different planes), lid motility and eye softness and an overall surgical assessment was made at the end of the procedure. Blepharospasm did not occur. The operating conditions were equally good in both groups (p > 0.05). These results suggest that good operating conditions for cataract operations can be provided by retrobulbar block alone without supplementary facial nerve block.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Regional nerve block of the upper eyelid in oculoplastic surgery.

PURPOSE: To establish the efficacy of a regional nerve block of the upper eyelid and its effect on levator motor function. METHODS: Forty-one patients underwent surgery on 54 upper eyelids by one surgeon, after administration of a regional nerve block at the supraorbital notch. The amount of pain experienced by patients due to the local anesthetic injection and surgery was determined by using visual analogue scores. The effect of the local anesthetic injection on levator function was determined by comparing the measured levator function prior to and following administration. Any complications attributable to the regional sensory nerve block were recorded. RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of patients found the injection painless, and the rest reported negligible pain. The mean pain score for the injection was 2 (SD 1.3, range 0-6). The mean pain score for the surgery was 0.3 (SD 0.6, range 0-3). No significant difference was found in levator function prior to and following the injection (pre-function: 14.4 mm, post-function: 13.4 mm, p=0.01). One patient had hematoma formation at the site of injection. CONCLUSIONS: A regional nerve block of the upper eyelid achieves effective sensory anesthesia,without compromising motor function. This helps in an accurate assessment of intraoperative height during upper lid surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Intercostal nerve block with flank incision.

We studied the postoperative course of 20 consecutive patients with T10 to 12 flank incisions, half of whom had intraoperative bupivacaine intercostal nerve blocks. The nerve block patients required less pain medication (p less than 0.001), ambulated 3 days earlier (p less than 0.001) and took a regular diet 2 days sooner (p less than 0.01) than the control patients.

Abdomen↗
PubMed2003

Sciatic nerve block in a child: a sonographic approach.

UNLABELLED: Ultrasound technology can facilitate peripheral nerve blocks in clinical practice. In this case report, ultrasound imaging was used to identify the sciatic nerve and guide local anesthetic injection in the subgluteal region of a child undergoing Achilles tendon lengthening. Sonographic guidance may be especially useful for peripheral nerve blocks in children because the neural imaging is often excellent and reference landmarks are variable. IMPLICATIONS: In this case report, ultrasound was used to identify the sciatic nerve and guide local anesthetic injection in the subgluteal region of a child. Sonographic guidance may be especially useful for peripheral nerve blocks in children because the neural imaging is often excellent and reference landmarks are variable.

Achilles Tendon↗
PubMed2002

Postoperative analgesia with continuous sciatic nerve block after foot surgery: a prospective, randomized comparison between the popliteal and subgluteal approaches.

UNLABELLED: To compare the posterior popliteal and subgluteal continuous sciatic nerve block for anesthesia and acute postoperative pain management after foot surgery, 60 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing elective orthopedic foot surgery were randomly assigned to either a Subgluteal group (n = 30) or Popliteal group (n = 30). Before surgery and after performing a femoral nerve block with 15 mL of 2% mepivacaine, we performed the sciatic nerve block with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine using either a subgluteal or posterior popliteal approach, and the placement of a catheter came afterward. In the recovery room, the catheter was connected to a patient-controlled analgesia pump to infuse 0.2% ropivacaine (basal infusion rate of 5 mL/h, incremental bolus of 10 mL, and a lockout time of 60 min). There were no technical problems in catheter placement. Intraoperative efficacy of nerve block was similar in the two groups. Postoperative catheter displacement and occlusion were recorded in four patients in the Popliteal group and two patients in the Subgluteal group (P = 0.67). Both approaches provided similar postoperative analgesia. We conclude that the subgluteal approach is as effective and safe as the previously described posterior popliteal approach for continuous sciatic block and can be considered a useful alternative to anesthesia and acute postoperative analgesia after foot procedures. IMPLICATIONS: Comparing two different approaches for continuous sciatic nerve block after orthopedic foot surgery, this prospective, randomized study demonstrated that the subgluteal approach is as effective and safe as the previously described posterior popliteal approach, and can be considered a useful alternative to anesthesia and acute postoperative analgesia after foot procedures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Postoperative analgesia with "3-in-1" femoral nerve block after prosthetic hip surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a single shot "3-in-1" femoral nerve block for prosthetic hip surgery in association with general anaesthesia on post-operative analgesia. METHODS: Forty patients, ASA 1 to 3, received sham block or "3-in-1" femoral nerve block, following Winnie's landmarks with a nerve stimulator, and 40 ml bupivacaine 0.5% with epinephrine were injected after induction of anaesthesia. Vecuronium, 0.1 mg.kg-1, was added after performing the block and anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane, oxygen 40% and nitrous oxide 60%. Fentanyl, 1.5 microgram.kg-1, was administered before incision to all patients. Heart rate, blood pressure, fentanyl requirements and FETiso were measured throughout surgery. During the post-operative period, 75 mg diclofenac i.m. and/or 0.1 mg.kg-1 morphine s.c. were administered when pain score was > 3/10 and repeated when necessary. Pain scores at first analgesic intervention, at 24 hr and 48 hr as well as diclofenac and morphine requirements after surgery were recorded. RESULTS: There was no difference in anaesthetic requirements during surgery. The time from performance of sham or "3-in-1" femoral nerve block to the first analgesic intervention (261 +/- 49 min versus 492 +/- 40 min, P < 0.05) and time from extubation to the first analgesic intervention (61 +/- 44 min vs 298 +/- 39 min, P < 0.05) were prolonged in the study group. However, pain scores and the analgesic requirements in the postoperative periods (24 and 48 hr) were similar. CONCLUSION: There is a short-term benefit during the first few postoperative hours in using a single shot "3-in-1" femoral nerve block to complement general anaesthesia for elective hip surgery.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed1996

The effect of diagnostic regional nerve blocks in the fore limb on the locomotion of clinically sound horses.

The practice of applying diagnostic nerve blocks relies on the assumption that the blocks in themselves do not alter the horse's gait. This assumption has recently been challenged. In the present paper a series of sequential nerve blocks (low palmar digital block, abaxial sesamoid block, high palmar block) was applied to clinically sound horses. Before and after each block the gait was clinically scored and Ground Reaction Forces (GRF) were measured. Clinical scoring did not change after any of the nerve blocks. None of the GRF variables changed significantly except for a slight alteration of the time at which the longitudinal GRF changed from a decelerative to a propulsive force. It is concluded that the basic assumption that diagnostic nerve blocks do not essentially alter the gait of a sound horse is correct.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Contralateral effect of amitriptyline and bupivacaine for sciatic nerve block in an animal model of inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Using a carrageenan inflammation rat model, we evaluated two experimental approaches to prolong sciatic nerve block on contralateral hyperalgesia. Method. We performed ipsilateral sciatic nerve block on the inflamed hind paw with bupivacaine-loaded microspheres suspended in dexamethasone (bupivacaine 12.5 mg) and with amitriptyline (6.25 and 12.5 mg) as ultralong-acting local anaesthetics. Bupivacaine (1.25 mg) was used as long-acting local anaesthetic and saline was used as a control. The sixth group received amitriptyline 6.25 mg intraperitoneally (n=10 for each group). RESULTS: The duration of ipsilateral nerve block was 2 h for bupivacaine, 7 h for amitriptyline 6.25 mg, 11 h for amitriptyline 12.5 mg and 21 h for bupivacaine-loaded microspheres in suspension with dexamethasone. Whereas contralateral hyperalgesia was not observed during block produced by bupivacaine-loaded microspheres, contralateral hyperalgesia was observed with sciatic nerve block using amitriptyline. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the differential effect observed on the contralateral side, the mechanism underlying the prolongation of ipsilateral block with amitriptyline may not result only from a prolonged Na(+) channel blockade but might be explained by a local toxic effect or lack of systemic actions.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed2006

[Acute pain management in proximal femoral fractures: femoral nerve block (catheter technique) vs. systemic pain therapy using a clinic internal organisation model].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of catheter-mediated femoral nerve block analgesia with systemic pain therapy in patients with proximal femoral fractures in the pre-operative and post-operative setting using a protocol for coordinating pain management. METHODS: In a prospective randomised trial of patients attending the emergency department, 100 individuals were selected with a clinically diagnosed proximal femoral fracture. Patients were divided into two equal groups A and B. Group A (n=50) received a catheter-mediated femoral nerve block with 1% prilocaine (40 ml) and post-operatively 0.2% ropivacaine (30 ml) 6 hourly. Group B (n=50) initially received intravenous metamizol (1 g) and a fixed combination of oral tilidine (100 mg) + naloxone (8 mg). Patients aged 90 years or more received a reduced dose (tilidine 75 mg + naloxone 6 mg). In the post-operative period regular oral ibuprofen (400 mg, 8 hourly) in addition to oral tilidine (50 mg) + naloxone (4 mg) was given as required for break through pain. Pain intensity was measured using a verbal rating scale (VRS) from 1 to 5: pain free (=1), mild pain (=2), moderate pain (=3), severe pain (=4), excruciating pain (=5). Pain scores were recorded at rest (R), during passive anteflection (30 degrees) of the hip (PA) on arrival and at 15 and 30 min after initial administration of analgesia. Thereafter, recordings were made 4 times a day up to the third post-operative day. RESULTS: Pain scores were comparable for both groups on admission (VRS in R 2.50 vs. 2.46; VRS during PA 4.30 vs. 4.34). Significant pain relief was achieved in both groups following initial administration of analgesia, but the total pain scores in group A were significantly lower than in group B (VRS in R 1.22 vs. 1.58, p<0.01 and VRS during PA 2.66 vs. 3.26; p<0.001). No difference was noted between the two groups during the first 3 post-operative days. No severe complications occurred as a result of analgesia, however, the catheter was dislodged in 20% of patients in group A resulting in the need for systemically administered analgesia. CONCLUSION: All patients presenting with proximal femoral fractures should receive adequate analgesia within the emergency department even prior to radiographic imaging. Femoral nerve block should be considered as the method of choice. The insertion of a femoral nerve block catheter has the dual advantage of early analgesia permitting repeated clinical examination in addition to continued post-operative pain management. The cumbersome logistics inherent in this technique within the clinical setting limits its practical application. An initial single-shot regional nerve block followed by a systemic post-operative analgesia protocol was considered an appropriate alternative. The execution of safe, consistent and appropriate regional nerve block anaesthesia is reliant on formal guidelines and protocols as agreed by the multidisciplinary teams involved with patient-directed pain management and good clinical practice.

Acute Disease↗