SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Peroxisomal Targeting Signal 2 Receptor”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

269 records · Page 15Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Regulation of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation-dependent pathway by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha and kinases.

The first PPAR (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor) was cloned in 1990 by Issemann and Green (Nature 347:645-650). This nuclear receptor was so named since it is activated by peroxisome proliferators including several drugs of the fibrate family, plasticizers, and herbicides. This receptor belongs to the steroid receptor superfamily. After activation by a specific ligand, it binds to a DNA response element, PPRE (peroxisome proliferator response element), which is a DR-1 direct repeat of the consensus sequence TGACCT x TGACCT. This mechanism leads to the transcriptional activation of target genes (Motojima et al., J Biol Chem 273:16710-16714, 1998). After the first discovery, several isoforms were characterized in most of the vertebrates investigated. PPAR alpha, activated by hypolipidemic agents of the fibrate family or by leukotrienes; regulates lipid metabolism as well as the detoxifying enzyme-encoding genes. PPAR beta/delta, which is not very well known yet, appears to be more specifically activated by fatty acids. PPAR gamma (subisoforms 1, 2, 3) is activated by the prostaglandin PGJ2 or by antidiabetic thiazolidinediones (Vamecq and Latruffe, Lancet 354:411-418, 1999). This latter isoform is involved in adipogenesis. The level of PPAR expression is largely dependent on the tissue type. PPAR alpha is mainly expressed in liver and kidney, while PPAR beta/delta is almost constitutively expressed. In contrast, PPAR gamma is largely expressed in white adipose tissue. PPAR is a transcriptional factor that requires other nuclear proteins in order to function, i.e. RXRalpha (9-cis-retinoic acid receptor alpha) in all cases in addition to other regulatory proteins. Peroxisomes are specific organelles for very long-chain and polyunsaturated fatty acid catabolism. From our results and those of others, the inventory of the role of PPAR alpha in the regulation of peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation is presented. In relation to this, we showed that PPAR alpha activates peroxisomal beta-oxidation-encoding genes such as acyl-CoA oxidase, multifunctional protein, and thiolase (Bardot et al., FEBS Lett 360:183-186, 1995). Moreover, rat liver PPAR alpha regulatory activity is dependent on its phosphorylated state (Passilly et al., Biochem Pharmacol 58:1001-1008, 1999). On the other hand, some signal transduction pathways such as protein kinase C are modified by peroxisome proliferators that increase the phosphorylation level of some specific proteins (Passilly et al. Eur J Biochem 230:316-321, 1995). From all these findings, PPAR alpha and kinases appear to play an important role in lipid homeostasis.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Identification of the CREB-binding protein/p300-interacting protein CITED2 as a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha coregulator.

Like other nuclear receptors, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) use a wide variety of protein-protein interactions to properly regulate transcription of target genes. In an attempt to identify novel PPAR-interacting proteins, a cDNA expression library was screened with bacterially expressed PPARalpha. One of the genes identified as a PPARalpha-associated protein by interaction cloning was the CREB-binding protein/p300-interacting transactivator with ED-rich tail 2 (CITED2, also called p35srj/mrg1/msg1). This coactivator interacted directly with PPARalpha in the presence or absence of ligand predominantly via the ligand binding domain of the nuclear receptor. In transient transfection reporter assays, CITED2 acted as a dose-dependent coactivator of PPARalpha-dependent transcriptional regulation in the presence of several exogenous ligands. CITED2 also increased PPARgamma-dependent regulation of reporter genes but had no effect on PPARbeta activity. To determine whether CITED2 affects endogenous gene expression, this protein was stably overexpressed (CITED2+) or repressed by small inhibitor RNA (CITED2-) in immortalized mouse hepatocytes. Relative to the control stably transfected or CITED2-cells, CITED2+ cells had an increased rate of cell proliferation. Microarray analysis and real time PCR showed that several genes are differentially affected by PPARalpha ligands in CITED2+ versus CITED2-cells. Genes that were affected by PPARalpha ligands in a CITED2-modulatory manner include angiopoietin-like protein 4, forkhead C2, hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha, and MAPK phosphatase 1. Interestingly these genes share common functions in that they are known to promote vascularization and angiogenesis in response to hypoxia. The results described here suggest that CIT-ED2 is a coactivator of PPARalpha and that both proteins may participate in signaling cascades of hypoxic response and angiogenesis.

3T3-L1 Cells↗

PubMed2006

Mechanisms leading to COX-2 expression and COX-2 induced tumorigenesis: topical therapeutic strategies targeting COX-2 expression and activity.

The biological role of COX-2, the inducible form of cyclooxygenase, is to convert arachidonic acid into prostaglandins (PGs) and thromboxanes (TXs). Overexpressed in many tumors, COX-2 plays a crucial role in cancer through synthesis of PGs which stimulate PGs receptors with subsequent enhancement of cellular proliferation, promotion of angiogenesis, inhibition of apoptosis, stimulation of invasion/motility, and suppression of immune responses. Depending on the tissue specificity and the cell type, several signaling pathways (Kinases, Rho, cGMP and Wnt), and transcription factors such as AP1, NFAT or NF-kappaB, are involved in COX-2 expression. In this review, we will describe mechanisms required by COX-2 metabolites to promote cancer development, and also the signaling pathways leading to COX-2 expression. In order to counteract the negative effects of COX-2 in cancerogenesis, chemicals interfering with COX-2 activity and expression were designed. We will give in the last part of this article, an overview of these potent chemicals interfering with the COX-2 signaling pathways involved in its expression or with its activity.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗

PubMed1999

Pex19p interacts with Pex3p and Pex10p and is essential for peroxisome biogenesis in Pichia pastoris.

We report the cloning and characterization of Pichia pastoris PEX19 by complementation of a peroxisome-deficient mutant strain. Import of peroxisomal targeting signal 1- and 2-containing peroxisomal matrix proteins is defective in pex19 mutants. PEX19 encodes a hydrophilic 299-amino acid protein with sequence similarity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex19p and human and Chinese hamster PxF, all farnesylated proteins, as well as hypothetical proteins from Caenorhabditis elegans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The farnesylation consensus is conserved in PpPex19p but dispensable for function and appears unmodified under the conditions tested. Pex19p localizes predominantly to the cytosolic fraction. Biochemical and two-hybrid analyses confirmed that Pex19p interacts with Pex3p, as seen in S. cerevisiae, but unexpectedly also with Pex10p. Two-hybrid analysis demonstrated that the amino-terminal 42 amino acids of Pex19p interact with the carboxyl-terminal 335 amino acids of Pex3p. In addition, the extreme carboxyl terminus of Pex19p (67 amino acids) is required for interaction with the amino-terminal 380 amino acids of Pex10p. Biochemical and immunofluorescence microscopy analyses of pex19Delta cells identified the membrane protein Pex3p in peroxisome remnants that were not previously observed in S. cerevisiae. These small vesicular and tubular (early) remnants are morphologically distinct from other Pppex mutant (late) remnants, suggesting that Pex19p functions at an early stage of peroxisome biogenesis.

ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters↗

PubMed1999

Peroxisome targeting of porcine 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type IV/D-specific multifunctional protein 2 is mediated by its C-terminal tripeptide AKI.

The product of the porcine HSD17B4 gene is a peroxisomal 80 kDa polypeptide containing three functionally distinct domains. The N-terminal part reveals activities of 17beta-estradiol dehydrogenase type IV and D-specific 3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase, the central part shows D-specific hydratase activity with straight and 2-methyl-branched 2-enoyl-CoAs. The C-terminal part is similar to sterol carrier protein 2. The 80 kDa polypeptide chain ends with the tripeptide AKI, which resembles the motif SKL, the first identified peroxisome targeting signal PTS1. So far AKI, although being similar to the consensus sequence PTS1, has neither been reported to be present in mammalian peroxisomal proteins, nor has it been shown to be functional. We investigated whether the HSD17B4 gene product is targeted to peroxisomes by this C-terminal motif. Recombinant human PTS1 binding protein Pex5p interacted with the bacterially expressed C-terminal domain of the HSD17B4 gene product. Binding was competitively blocked by a SKL-containing peptide. Recombinant deletion mutants of the C-terminal domain lacking 3, 6, and 14 amino acids and presenting KDY, MIL, and IML, respectively, at their C-termini did not interact with Pex5p. The wild-type protein and mutants were also transiently expressed in the HEK 293 cells. Immunofluorescence analysis with polyclonal antibodies against the C-terminal domain showed a typical punctate peroxisomal staining pattern upon wild-type transfection, whereas all mutant proteins localized in the cytoplasm. Therefore, AKI is a functional PTS1 signal in mammals and the peroxisome targeting of the HSD17B4 gene product is mediated by Pex5p.

17-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases↗

PubMed2005

PPARgamma-mediated insulin sensitization: the importance of fat versus muscle.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARgamma) is a nuclear hormone receptor that functions as a transcriptional regulator in a variety of tissues. PPARgamma activation, e.g., through binding of the synthetic glitazones or thiazolidinediones (TZD), results in a marked improvement in type 2 diabetic patients of insulin and glucose parameters resulting from an improvement of whole body insulin sensitivity. The role of different metabolic tissues (fat, skeletal muscle, liver) in mediating PPARgamma function in glucose and insulin homeostasis is still unclear. Recently, the function of PPARgamma in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle has been intensively characterized by using targeted deletion of PPARgamma in those tissues. In those studies, adipose PPARgamma has been identified as an essential mediator for the maintainance of whole body insulin sensitivity. Two major mechanisms have been described. 1) Adipose PPARgamma protects nonadipose tissue against excessive lipid overload and maintains normal organ function (liver, skeletal muscle); and 2) adipose PPARgamma guarantees a balanced and adequate production of secretion from adipose tissue of adipocytokines such as adiponectin and leptin, which are important mediators of insulin action in peripheral tissues. In contrast to studies in adipose-specific PPARgamma-deficient mice, the data in muscle-specific PPARgamma(-/-) mice demonstrate that whole body insulin sensitivity is, at least in part, relying on an intact PPARgamma system in skeletal muscle. Finally, these early and elegant studies using tissue-specific PPARgamma knockout mouse models pinpoint adipose tissue as the major target of TZD-mediated improvement of hyperlipidemia and insulin sensitization.

Adipose Tissue↗

PubMed2006

Interaction with MEK causes nuclear export and downregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma.

The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) cascade plays a central role in intracellular signaling by many extracellular stimuli. One target of the ERK cascade is peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma), a nuclear receptor that promotes differentiation and apoptosis. It was previously demonstrated that PPARgamma activity is attenuated upon mitogenic stimulation due to phosphorylation of its Ser84 by ERKs. Here we show that stimulation by tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA) attenuates PPARgamma's activity in a MEK-dependent manner, even when Ser84 is mutated to Ala. To elucidate the mechanism of attenuation, we found that PPARgamma directly interacts with MEKs, which are the activators of ERKs, but not with ERKs themselves, both in vivo and in vitro. This interaction is facilitated by MEKs' phosphorylation and is mediated by the basic D domain of MEK1 and the AF2 domain of PPARgamma. Immunofluorescence microscopy and subcellular fractionation revealed that MEK1 exports PPARgamma from the nucleus, and this finding was supported by small interfering RNA knockdown of MEK1 and use of a cell-permeable interaction-blocking peptide, which prevented TPA-induced export of PPARgamma from the nucleus. Thus, we show here a novel mode of downregulation of PPARgamma by its MEK-dependent redistribution from the nucleus to the cytosol. This unanticipated role for the stimulation-induced nuclear shuttling of MEKs shows that MEKs can regulate additional signaling components besides the ERK cascade.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗

PubMed2003

Troglitazone antagonizes tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced reprogramming of adipocyte gene expression by inhibiting the transcriptional regulatory functions of NF-kappaB.

Troglitazone (TGZ), a member of the thiazolidinedione class of anti-diabetic compounds and a peroxisome proliferator activator receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma) agonist, restores systemic insulin sensitivity and improves the full insulin resistance syndrome in vivo. The mechanisms underlying its in vivo function are not understood. Here we investigated the potential functional interaction between PPAR-gamma and NF-kappaB in adipocytes. We show that TGZ selectively blocked tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced and NF-kappaB-dependent repression of multiple adipocyte-specific genes and induction of growth phase and other genes. This occurs without interfering with NF-kappaB expression, activation, nuclear translocation, or DNA binding and without suppressing NF-kappaB-dependent survival signals. Notably, the expressions of some tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced genes in adipocytes were unaffected by PPAR-gamma activation. In reporter gene assays in HeLa cells, ectopic expression of PPAR-gamma abolished induction of a NF-kappaB-responsive reporter gene by the p65 subunit (RelA) of NF-kappaB, and the inhibition was further enhanced in the presence of TGZ. Conversely, overexpression of p65 inhibited induction of a PPAR-gamma-responsive reporter gene by activated PPAR-gamma in a dose-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect was independent of the presence of NF-kappaB-binding sites in the promoter region. Other NF-kappaB family members, p50 and c-Rel as well as the S276A mutant of p65, blocked PPAR-gamma-mediated gene transcription less effectively. Thus, p65 antagonizes the transcriptional regulatory activity of PPAR-gamma in adipocytes, and PPAR-gamma activation can at least partially override the inhibitory effects of p65 on the expression of key adipocyte genes. Our data suggest that inhibition of NF-kappaB activity is a mechanism by which PPAR-gamma agonists improve insulin sensitivity in vivo and that adipocyte NF-kappaB is a potential therapeutic target for obesity-linked type 2 diabetes.

3T3 Cells↗

PubMed2005

Testosterone inhibits adipogenic differentiation in 3T3-L1 cells: nuclear translocation of androgen receptor complex with beta-catenin and T-cell factor 4 may bypass canonical Wnt signaling to down-regulate adipogenic transcription factors.

Testosterone supplementation in men decreases fat mass; however, the mechanisms by which it inhibits fat mass are unknown. We hypothesized that testosterone inhibits adipogenic differentiation of preadipocytes by activation of androgen receptor (AR)/beta-catenin interaction and subsequent translocation of this complex to the nucleus thereby bypassing canonical Wnt signaling. We tested this hypothesis in 3T3-L1 cells that differentiate to form fat cells in adipogenic medium. We found that these cells express AR and that testosterone and dihydrotestosterone dose-dependently inhibited adipogenic differentiation as analyzed by Oil Red O staining and down-regulation of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha and -delta and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma2 protein and mRNA. These inhibitory effects of androgens were partially blocked by flutamide or bicalutamide. Androgen treatment was associated with nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and AR. Immunoprecipitation studies demonstrated association of beta-catenin with AR and T-cell factor 4 (TCF4) in the presence of androgens. Transfection of TCF4 cDNA inhibited adipogenic differentiation, whereas a dominant negative TCF4 cDNA construct induced adipogenesis and blocked testosterone's inhibitory effects. Our gene array analysis indicates that testosterone treatment led to activation of some Wnt target genes. Expression of constitutively activated AR fused with VP-16 did not inhibit the expression of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha in the absence of androgens. Testosterone and dihydrotestosterone inhibit adipocyte differentiation in vitro through an AR-mediated nuclear translocation of beta-catenin and activation of downstream Wnt signaling. These data provide evidence for a regulatory role for androgens in inhibiting adipogenic differentiation and a mechanistic explanation consistent with the observed reduction in fat mass in men treated with androgens.

3T3 Cells↗

PubMed2006

Modes of action and species-specific effects of di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate in the liver.

The industrial plasticizer di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) is used in manufacturing of a wide variety of polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-containing medical and consumer products. DEHP belongs to a class of chemicals known as peroxisome proliferators (PPs). PPs are a structurally diverse group of compounds that share many (but perhaps not all) biological effects and are characterized as non-genotoxic rodent carcinogens. This review focuses on the effect of DEHP in liver, a primary target organ for the pleiotropic effects of DEHP and other PPs. Specifically, liver parenchymal cells, identified herein as hepatocytes, are a major cell type that are responsive to exposure to PPs, including DEHP; however, other cell types in the liver may also play a role. The PP-induced increase in the number and size of peroxisomes in hepatocytes, so called 'peroxisome proliferation' that results in elevation of fatty acid metabolism, is a hallmark response to these compounds in the liver. A link between peroxisome proliferation and tumor formation has been a predominant, albeit questioned, theory to explain the cause of a hepatocarcinogenic effect of PPs. Other molecular events, such as induction of cell proliferation, decreased apoptosis, oxidative DNA damage, and selective clonal expansion of the initiated cells have been also been proposed to be critically involved in PP-induced carcinogenesis in liver. Considerable differences in the metabolism and molecular changes induced by DEHP in the liver, most predominantly the activation of the nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha, have been identified between species. Both sexes of rats and mice develop adenomas and carcinomas after prolonged feeding with DEHP; however, limited DEHP-specific human data are available, even though exposure to DEHP and other phthalates is common in the general population. This likely constitutes the largest gap in our knowledge on the potential for DEHP to cause liver cancer in humans. Overall, it is believed that the sequence of key events that are relevant to DEHP-induced liver carcinogenesis in rodents involves the following events whereby the combination of the molecular signals and multiple pathways, rather than a single hallmark event (such as induction of PPARalpha and peroxisomal genes, or cell proliferation) contribute to the formation of tumors: (i) rapid metabolism of the parental compound to primary and secondary bioactive metabolites that are readily absorbed and distributed throughout the body; (ii) receptor-independent activation of hepatic macrophages and production of oxidants; (iii) activation of PPARalpha in hepatocytes and sustained increase in expression of peroxisomal and non-peroxisomal metabolism-related genes; (iv) enlargement of many hepatocellular organelles (peroxisomes, mitochondria, etc.); (v) rapid but transient increase in cell proliferation, and a decrease in apoptosis; (vi) sustained hepatomegaly; (vii) chronic low-level oxidative stress and accumulation of DNA damage; (viii) selective clonal expansion of the initiated cells; (ix) appearance of the pre-neoplastic nodules; (x) development of adenomas and carcinomas.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Hypoxia up-regulates expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma angiopoietin-related gene (PGAR) in cardiomyocytes: role of hypoxia inducible factor 1alpha.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR), especially the PPARalpha and PPARgamma, are associated with an extraordinary diverse spectrum of cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, angiogenesis, cardiac hypertrophy, and atherosclerosis. PGAR (for PPAR gamma angiopoietin-related gene) is a recently identified PPAR target gene which is associated with adipose differentiation, systemic lipid metabolism, energy homeostasis, and possibly angiogenesis. We report here that WY-14643, a selective PPARalpha ligand up-regulated PGAR expression in neonatal rat cardiomyocytes. In parallel to activating the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and glucose transporter-4, hypoxia increased PGAR mRNA levels. PGAR expression was also increased by desferrioxamine and CoCl(2), but not by sodium cyanide, results consistent with the pharmacological features of hypoxia-responsive genes. These studies are the first to demonstrate that hypoxia increases the mRNA levels of a PPAR target gene in cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, infection with adenoviral vectors encoding the wild-type or a hybrid form of HIF-1alpha highly increased PGAR mRNA levels. In contrast, neither hypoxia nor overexpression of HIF-1alpha affected the mRNA levels of PPARalpha, PPAR gamma, and muscle carnitine palmitoyltransferase, a known PPARalpha target gene. These results suggest that hypoxic activation of PGAR expression is likely mediated by HIF-1 but not the PPARalpha/RXR pathway.

Angiogenesis Inducing Agents↗

PubMed2002

Human immunodeficiency virus and host cell lipids. Interesting pathways in research for a new HIV therapy.

It has been reported in the literature that biological membranes arising from HIV-induced cell fusion, as well as syncytium formation between infected and non-infected cells and those involved in transduction, viral DNA nuclear import and virion budding from the host cell, are all made of proteins, a phospholipid (P) bilayer and cholesterol (C). However, the P/C molar ratio is higher in the retroviral envelope than in the plasma membrane where they originate, and higher than in the nuclear envelope. Mechanisms are described which elucidate this puzzling fact, as well as cholesterol-dependent leakage and pore formation during cell fusion. Fatty acylation of viral and host cell proteins is required to direct them to membranes. Detergent-insoluble microdomains enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids, termed either DIGs (detergent-insoluble glycolipid-enriched complexes), DRMs (detergent resistant membranes), TIFFs (Triton-insoluble floating fractions) or GEMs (glycolipid-enriched membranes), function as platforms for attachment of proteins in the process of signal transduction. HIV-SUgp120 (HIV-surface glycoprotein), T-cell receptor (TCR)-CD4+ and co-receptors promote aggregation of these lipid "rafts" which concentrate the Src family tyrosine kinases SFKs (PTK, Lyn, Fyn, Lck), GPI (glycosyl phosphatidylinositol)-anchored proteins, and phosphatidylinositol kinases PI(3)K and PI(4)K, inducing cell signalling. HIV-SUgp120 transduces the activation signal and provokes the formation of polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) metabolites, i.e. the prostaglandin PGE2 suppressor of immune function and inhibitor of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) proliferation, while PGB2 activates SFKs and increases mRNA expression, as well as NFkappaB (nuclear transcription factor) translocation to nucleus. HIV nuclear import, DNA integration, chromatin template capacity may be mediated by the lipid environment. The lipid-enriched microdomains from which HIV-1 buds, may explain the high level of cholesterol and sphingolipids in the viral envelope, since host cell rafts become a viral coat. HIV-1 infection induces alteration of cellular lipids: (1) shift in phospholipid synthesis to neutral lipids associated with the viral load, polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) peroxidation, and n-3 deficiency with deregulation of cytokines and PPAR-gamma (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma), and (2) alloimmune phospholipid antibody production in which antibodies to cardiolipin and to phosphatidylserine are most prevalent, due to the destruction of mitochondrial membranes and progression of lymphocyte apoptosis. The current highly active anti-retroviral therapy, including both viral reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors (NRTIs and NNRTIs, nucleoside and non-nucleoside RT inhibitors) and protease inhibitors (PIs), induces side-effects in the long term. Lipodystrophy (LD), consists of peripheral lipoatrophy associated with central fat accumulation (called "crixbelly" and "buffalo hump"), insulin resistance, elevation of very low density lipoproteins, decrease in high density lipoproteins and inhibition of adipocyte differentiation. LD syndrome appears to be induced by PIs that inhibit GLUT4, glucose transporter isoform, and by NRTIs which provoke mitochondrial failure. New therapeutic strategies assessed: (1) inhibition of the viral integrase and/or HIV entry into cells through natural products or their derivatives, (2) inhibition of HIV-1 entry into macrophages pretreated with Gram-negative bacterial lipopolysaccharide, (3) vaccination with multi-lipopeptides, i.e. sequences of HIV-1 peptides with CD4+ T-cell and B-cell epitopes, modified by adding a lipid tail to one end, which produce HIV-specific CTL and multispecific immune responses in most of the vaccinated subjects and (4) stimulation of antiviral drug activity with lipid-prodrugs targeting viral RT, polymerase, integrase, or aspartyl-protease.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed2006

Control of mitochondrial biogenesis during myogenesis.

We used expression and reporter gene analysis to understand how changes in transcription factors impinge on mitochondrial gene expression during myogenesis of cultured murine myoblasts (C2C12 and Sol8). The mRNA levels for nuclear respiratory factor-1 (NRF-1) and NRF-2alpha increased 60% by the third day of myogenesis, whereas NRF-1 and NRF-2 reporter gene activity increased by fivefold over the same period. Although peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPARalpha) mRNA levels increased almost 10-fold, the activity of a PPAR reporter was unchanged during myogenesis. The PPAR coactivator PPAR-gamma coactivator-1alpha (PGC1alpha), a master controller of mitochondrial biogenesis, was not expressed at detectable levels. However, the mRNA for both PGC1alpha-related coactivator and PGC1beta was abundant, with the latter increasing by 50% over 3 days of differentiation. We also conducted promoter analysis of the gene for citrate synthase (CS), a common mitochondrial marker enzyme. The proximal promoter ( approximately 2,100 bp) of the human CS lacks binding sites for PPAR, NRF-1, or NRF-2. Deletion mutants, a targeted mutation, and an Sp1 site-containing reporter construct suggest that changes in Sp1 regulation also participate in mitochondrial biogenesis during myogenesis. Because most mitochondrial genes are regulated by PPARs, NRF-1, and/or NRF-2, we conducted inhibitor studies to further support the existence of a distinct pathway for CS gene regulation in myogenesis. Although both LY-294002 (a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor) and SB-203580 (a p38-MAPK inhibitor) blocked myogenesis (as indicated by creatine phosphokinase activity), only SB-203580 prevented the myogenic increase in cytochrome oxidase activity, whereas only LY-294002 blocked the increase in CS (enzyme and reporter gene activities). Collectively, these studies help delineate the roles of some transcriptional regulators involved in mitochondrial biogenesis associated with myogenesis and underscore an import role for posttranscriptional regulation of transcription factor activity.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

A dominant negative human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR){alpha} is a constitutive transcriptional corepressor and inhibits signaling through all PPAR isoforms.

Several missense mutations in the ligand-binding domain of human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma have been described in subjects with dominantly inherited severe insulin resistance associated with partial lipodystrophy, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. These mutant receptors behave as dominant-negative inhibitors of PPARgamma signaling when studied in transfected cells. The extent to which such dominant-negative effects extend to signaling through other coexpressed PPAR isoforms has not been evaluated. To examine these issues further, we have created a PPARalpha mutant harboring twin substitutions, Leu459Ala and Glu462Ala, within the ligand binding domain (PPARalpha(mut)), examined its signaling properties, and compared the effects of dominant-negative PPARalpha and PPARgamma mutants on basal and ligand-induced gene transcription in adipocytes and hepatocytes. PPARalpha(mut) was transcriptionally inactive, repressed basal activity from a PPAR response element-containing promoter, inhibited the coactivator function of cotransfected PPAR-gamma coactivator 1alpha, and strongly inhibited the transcriptional response to cotransfected wild-type receptor. In contrast to PPARgamma, wild-type PPARalpha failed to recruit the transcriptional corepressors NCoR and SMRT. However, PPARalpha(mut) avidly recruited these corepressors in a ligand-dissociable manner. In hepatocytes and adipocytes, both PPARalpha(mut) and the corresponding PPARgamma mutant were capable of inhibiting the expression of genes primarily regulated by PPARalpha, -gamma, or -delta ligands, albeit with some differences in potency. Thus, dominant-negative forms of PPARalpha and PPARgamma are capable of interfering with PPAR signaling in a manner that is not wholly restricted to their cognate target genes. These findings may have implications for the pathogenesis of human syndromes resulting from mutations in this family of transcription factors.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2006

NF-kappaB/PPAR gamma and/or AP-1/PPAR gamma 'on/off' switches and induction of CBP in colon adenocarcinomas: correlation with COX-2 expression.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Several studies indicate that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) represses activator protein-1 (AP-1) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappaB) transcriptional activity and this negative cross-talk occupies an important role in carcinogenesis. The present study evaluated the differential expression profile of AP-1 constituents (c-FOS and phosphorylated-active pc-JUN), p-I kappaB-alpha (phosphorylated I kappaB-alpha, a signaling intermediate of NF-kappaB pathway), PPAR gamma, cyclic AMP-response element binding-binding protein (CBP, a known AP-1, NF-kappaB, and PPAR gamma transcriptional coactivator), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R), p53, and COX-2 in normal colonic epithelial cells and colon adenocarcinoma cells. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immunohistochemical methodology was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections from 60 patients with colon adenocarcinomas. A molecular profile was created for each patient and the induction or down-regulation of each pathway from normal to cancer cells was documented. Relationships between transcription factors and downstream molecular targets were evaluated by Spearman's rho correlation coefficient and validated by nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS/FINDINGS: P-I kappaB-alpha (P<0.001), CBP (P<0.001), c-FOS (P=0.047), pc-JUN (P=0.047), and EGF-R (P<0.001) were up-regulated in colon adenocarcinomas while PPAR gamma (P<0.001) was concomitantly down-regulated. p-I kappaB-alpha, CBP, pc-JUN, EGF-R, and p53 expression all correlated positively with COX-2 while PPAR gamma expression correlated inversely with COX-2. INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSION: NF-kappaB/PPAR gamma and/or AP-1/PPAR gamma expressional 'on/off' switches are common molecular events during colorectal carcinogenesis. Down-regulation of PPAR gamma and induction of the CBP transcriptional coactivator can augment NF-kappaB and AP-1 transcriptional activities leading to up-regulation of COX-2 expression in colon adenocarcinoma cells. p-I kappaB-alpha, pc-JUN, and CBP could potentially provide the basis for future molecular-targeted anticancer therapies.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2004

Transcriptional cofactors exhibit differential preference toward peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and delta in uterine cells.

We previously showed that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta (PPARdelta) is crucial for embryo implantation as a receptor for cyclooxygenase-2-derived prostacyclin in mice. PPARs belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily. They form heterodimer with a retinoid X receptor, recruit transcriptional cofactors, and bind to a specific recognition element for regulation of target genes. Although cofactors are generally shared by various nuclear receptors, some are involved in cell-specific events. The objective of this investigation was to examine interactions of transcriptional cofactors with PPARdelta in uterine cells for its effectiveness in regulating gene expression. We chose two uterine cellular systems: periimplantation mouse uterus and AN(3)CA human uterine cell line. As examined by in situ hybridization, steroid receptor coactivator (SRC)-2, SRC-3, PPAR-interacting protein, receptor-interacting protein 140 (RIP140), nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR), and silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid hormone receptor (SMRT) exhibit overlapping expression with that of PPARdelta in the periimplantation mouse uterus. Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays show that PPARdelta physically interacts with SRC 1-3, RIP140, PPAR-binding protein, N-CoR, and SMRT in the absence of ligands, suggesting their potent interactions with PPARdelta. Transient transfection assays in AN(3)CA cells show that among members of the SRC family, only SRC-2 serves as a true coactivator for PPARdelta, whereas all SRC members could enhance PPARalpha-induced transcriptional activation. Interestingly, N-CoR and SMRT potently repress PPARdelta-induced transcriptional activation but fail to repress PPARalpha activity. RIP140 is effective in repressing basal and PPAR-induced transcriptional activation. Collectively, the results suggest that gene regulation by PPARdelta in the uterine cells uniquely responds to SRC-2, N-CoR, SMRT, or RIP140, and these interactions may be operative during implantation when these cofactors are abundantly expressed.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

PubMed2002

Complexities in ETS-domain transcription factor function and regulation: lessons from the TCF (ternary complex factor) subfamily. The Colworth Medal Lecture.

The ETS-domain transcription factor family can be divided into a series of subfamilies. Elk-1 represents the founding member of the ternary complex factor (TCF) subfamily. By focusing on the TCF subfamily, we can demonstrate the complexities that exist in the function and regulation of ETS-domain transcription factors. This article focuses on Elk-1 in detail and summarizes the functions of other TCFs. The key themes covered include the domain structure of the TCFs, the mechanisms of complex formation with serum response factor, regulation of TCFs by mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades, and transcriptional regulatory properties of the TCFs. Finally, the emerging role of the TCFs in vivo is discussed. A picture is developing indicating that, while these proteins exhibit significant sequence and functional conservation, key differences in their structure and regulation are being identified which may relate to unique functions of these proteins in vivo.

Amino Acid Sequence↗