PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Practice Guidelines as Topic”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 271 records · Page 15Linked to original sources

National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, Expert Panel Report. II: Overview and application to primary care.

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program is housed in the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health. To help health professionals care for people with asthma, the NHLBI convened panels of experts twice to prepare guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. The first Expert Panel Report was released in 1991. The new 1997 guidelines are an evolutionary update of the initial 1991 report and are based on an improved understanding of the mechanisms of the disease and newer approaches to treatment. The recommendations are based on a review of more than 6000 scientific articles reviewed by the Expert Panel over the last 2 years. Four essential components of asthma management are described with new classifications of asthma severity and new guidelines for step therapy. The role of patient education in asthma management is emphasized in the report as well as the role of the primary care clinician and the expert consultant.

Anti-Asthmatic Agents↗

[Developing an evidence based clinical guideline on cardiac rehabilitation--Phase 2: comparative analysis of the present level of service provision in cardiac rehabilitation based on the KTL statistics].

BACKGROUND: This project aims to develop an evidence based clinical guideline for the rehabilitation of cardiac patients considering recent scientific literature (stage 1), procedures received by cardiac patients undergoing rehabilitation carried by the German Federal Insurance Institute for Salaried Employees (BfA) based on the Classification of Therapeutic Procedures (KTL) (stage 2), and expert agreement of the professionals involved (stage 3). This study presents the results of stage 2. The analysis of the KTL-statistics was carried out to determine whether it is essentially necessary to implement a guideline and to define "critical" aspects, i. e. aspects that require high priority implementation. The project is part of a research programme funded by the BfA. METHODS: 317 out of the 840 possible KTL-codes were attributed to one of twelve therapeutic modules that--according to the results of stage 1--are characteristics of cardiac rehabilitation. For these modules the number of people having received therapeutic procedures belonging to the respective module the duration per patient and per week were calculated. The influence of concomitant factors such as age, gender and indication were analysed multivariately. Furthermore, the hospitals involved were compared. The analyses are based on approximately 87,400 KTL-entries from 5,494 patients (indication: "myocardial infarction" or "coronary artery bypass surgery") treated in 2000. RESULTS: On average the patients receive therapeutic procedures "stemming" from 5.5 modules. More than 90 % receive procedures assigned to the modules "endurance training" or "motivation", respectively, and almost 70 % from "nutrition training". The other modules are rendered not consistently and occasionally to a relatively small degree. Younger patients following a myocardial infarction receive therapeutic procedures more frequently and longer while older patients after bypass surgery are treated less frequently and for a shorter duration. There is substantial variability between individual clinics. DISCUSSION: It appears to be necessary to implement clinical practice guidelines in all evaluated therapeutic modules but "endurance training" and "motivation". An evidence based clinical practice guideline for the rehabilitation of cardiac patients should detail the kind and extent of procedure(s) required. It should also inform about the lack of evidence for variations in treatment with respect to age, gender, or indication. To facilitate monitoring of the degree of implementation of the guideline precise instructions for the documentation using the KTL should be developed and implemented. As a next step towards an evidence based, empirically proven and acceptable guideline this project's results will be discussed with experts from science and clinical practice.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

Case management guideline: Alzheimer disease and other dementias.

Case management guidelines are an integration of information obtained from research, observations, clinical experience, and judgments of expert clinicians, scientists, and clients. This guideline integrates information from multiple practice guidelines in order to guide the case manager in managing clients with Alzheimer disease and other dementias. The guideline provides direction in recognition of symptoms or triggers, risk factors, possible complications, case management outcomes, barriers to effective outcomes, goals, providers/practitioners, treatment options, location of treatment, estimated cost of treatment, psychosocial issues, life planning and long-term planning, vocational issues and teaching protocols. In addition, resource contacts and sources for major instruments used in measuring Alzheimer disease and dementia are presented.

Aged↗

Inappropriate discharge instructions for youth athletes hospitalized for concussion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the medical care, especially the discharge instructions regarding return to participation, received by youth athletes hospitalized for a closed head injury. METHODS: We examined the records of all patients admitted over a 5-year period (1987 through 1991) to The Children's Hospital of Alabama for a sports-related closed head injury. Descriptive information was recorded and discharge instructions reviewed. Injury severity was graded according to guidelines current during the study period, as well as those outlined most recently by the Colorado Medical Society, which have been endorsed by a number of organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics. Discharge instructions recorded for each patient were then compared with those recommended in the guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 33 patients with sports-related closed head injuries. Grade 1 concussions (least severe) occurred in 8 patients (24.2%), grade 2 in 10 (30.3%), and grade 3 (most severe) in 15 (45.4%). Overall, discharge instructions were appropriate for only 10 patients (30.3%), including all with grade 1 concussions, but only 2 with a grade 2 (20.0%) and none with a grade 3 concussion. CONCLUSION: All who care for youth athletes must become familiar with the guidelines for management of concussion to provide appropriate care and counseling and to avoid a tragic outcome.

Adolescent↗

Variations in experience in obtaining local ethical approval for participation in a multi-centre study.

BACKGROUND: The Department of Health recently issued guidance on how Local Research Ethics Committees (LRECs) should handle an Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee (MREC)-approved application. This process is intended as a rapid standardized approval process, facilitating the execution of clinical trials. AIM: To evaluate if this guidance had led to an efficient process for obtaining local ethical approval. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent by post to Local Investigators of the 56 centres who had obtained LREC approval for the Multi-centre Intrapleural Streptokinase Trial. RESULTS: Replies were received from 51 centres (91%). A total of 25 296 pieces of paper and 62 h of photocopying time were required to meet the 51 LRECs' requirements. LREC meetings ranged from weekly to bimonthly, with only 24 (47%) having a 'fast track' system in place. Applications took a median of 27 (1-90) days from submission to first being considered, with local investigators spending 3.27 (0.5-15) h on each submission. Nineteen (37%) of the local investigators felt the LREC/MREC interface did not work well and 17 (33%) were at least partly deterred from participating in future trials. DISCUSSION: The guidelines do not seem to have been implemented by all LREC committees, leading to wide variation in local experience.

Ethical Review↗

Factorial design provides evidence to guide practice of anaesthesia.

Many scientific articles are written merely to get something published, neglecting the clinician who would like the medical literature to guide their practice. Evidence-based medicine is expected to help in clinical decision-making. Systematic reviews of the literature followed by a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials (RCT) have claimed to represent the highest strength of evidence. However, the results published in meta-analyses have not always been confirmed in subsequent large RCTs. An analysis of 12 large RCTs and 19 meta-analyses addressing the same questions found that the outcomes of these large RCTs were not predicted accurately 35% of the time by previously published meta-analyses. Therefore, meta-analyses of several small RCTs do not obviate the need for large, multicentre RCTs, which can still be considered as a gold standard for the development of clinical guidelines or practice plans. Moreover, large RCTs using a factorial design can be highly efficient because they can answer several clinical questions at the same time and offer the only systematic approach to investigate an interaction of combinations in multimodal approaches.

Anesthesia↗

Safety considerations and safe handling of oral chemotherapy agents.

As a class of drugs, chemotherapy agents have two unique features. They have low therapeutic indexes, which places patients at an increased risk for medication errors, and they are considered hazardous drugs, which places patients and nurses at risk for environmental exposure. Policies and procedures for handling and administering oral chemotherapy agents are essential to promoting patients' and nurses' safety. Risk-reduction measures for administering oral chemotherapy in nontraditional healthcare settings, such as the home, require instituting a two-person dose-verification system, educating everyone who will administer and handle these agents, and developing procedures for securely and appropriately storing oral chemotherapy agents. Currently, no standardized guidelines exist for handling oral chemotherapy agents, and institutions must develop their own policies and procedures. This article discusses oral chemotherapy safety considerations, including safe handling of these agents, and offers recommendations for practice.

Administration, Oral↗

Activity restrictions as part of the discharge management for children with a traumatic head injury.

This article describes a proactive management strategy that is currently part of the discharge protocol for children seeking care for a head injury (HI) at a pediatric and adolescent trauma center. The strategy consists of setting activity restrictions for children hospitalized and those seen in the emergency department after a HI that may or not have been sports related. It was developed based on extensive clinical experience with families of children with a HI and existing guidelines for returning athletes to sports. Possible merits and pitfalls of the strategy are discussed.

Activities of Daily Living↗

[Scandinavian guidelines for management of head injuries. Evidence-based management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries].

The Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee (SNC) was created by the Scandinavian Neurosurgical Society in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for improved care of neurotrauma patients. A MEDLINE search identified 475 papers dealing with the management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries. Forty-two studies presenting Class II evidence on the initial management of such injuries were reviewed, and management guidelines were developed. Implementation of the Head Injury Severity Scale is advocated. Patients with Minimal injuries (no loss of consciousness [LOC], Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 15) can be safely discharged. Routine early computerized tomography [CT] scan is recommended in cases with Mild injuries (history of LOC, GCS 14-15) and patients with normal scans may be discharged. CT scan and admission is mandatory in Moderate injuries (GCS 9-13). All patients with additional risk factors should be scanned and admitted. A flow-chart for clinical decision making and a Head Injury Instruction card is introduced. The SNC suggests guidelines that should be safe and cost-effective for the initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries.

Consciousness↗

[Recommendations for the management of asthma].

Recommendations for the management of asthma have been proposed for the last 15 years around the world. These recommendations have been internationalised and the latest one, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) is a World Health Organisation--National Institutes of Health initiative. Asthma recommendations were initially based on opinion of experts but the newest will be evidence-based. The GINA guidelines concern diagnosis, assessment of severity and treatment of asthma. They include all parts of asthma treatment: allergen avoidance, immunotherapy, pharmacotherapy and education. These guidelines are applied in over 100 countries worldwide, and, in countries where they are applied, morbidity and mortality due to asthma have decreased.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents↗

New therapeutic options in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common, costly, and undertreated disorder in the United States, and dyslipidemia is one of its most important modifiable risk factors. Recently, the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) published updated guidelines for the treatment of lipid disorders, greatly expanding the number of patients eligible for therapy. In the new recommendations, several significant changes have been made in the identification and management of patients at risk for CHD. Although ATP III maintains that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol should be the primary target of lipid-lowering therapy, it identifies non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (total cholesterol minus HDL cholesterol) as a secondary target in patients with elevated triglycerides. Patients with > or = 2 CHD risk factors should now be assessed for 10-year absolute CHD risk based on the Framingham Point Scale to identify those who require more aggressive treatment. The guidelines also designate a new category, CHD risk equivalent, which recognizes that certain patients have the same high risk as those with established CHD. Diabetes is now identified as a CHD risk equivalent, as are other forms of atherosclerotic disease and multiple risk factors comprising a CHD 10-year risk of > 20%. New lipoprotein classifications are given, and increased emphasis is placed on the metabolic syndrome, a constellation of metabolic risk factors, as a marker for CHD risk. Since adherence poses a major challenge in the management of patients with or at risk for CHD, the new guidelines provide physicians with several strategies for increasing patient compliance. The new guidelines should help physicians better identify and manage patients at risk for CHD, help more patients reach their lipid goals, and thereby decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Adult↗

Communication on end-of-life decisions with patients wishing to die at home: the making of a guideline for GPs in Flanders, Belgium.

BACKGROUND: Communication with patients on end-of-life decisions is a delicate topic for which there is little guidance. AIM: To describe the development of a guideline for GPs on end-of-life communication with patients who wish to die at home, in a context where patient autonomy and euthanasia are legally regulated. DESIGN OF STUDY: A three-phase process (generation, elaboration and validation). In the generation phase, literature findings were structured and then prioritised in a focus group with GPs of a palliative care consultation network. In the elaboration phase, qualitative data on patients' and caregivers' perspectives were gathered through a focus group with next-of-kin, in-depth interviews with terminal patients, and four quality circle sessions with representatives of all constituencies. In the validation phase, the acceptability of the draft guideline was reviewed in bipolar focus groups (GPs-nurses and GPs-specialists). Finally, comments were solicited from experts by mail. SETTING: Primary home care in Belgium. SUBJECTS: Participants in this study were terminal patients (n = 17), next-of-kin of terminal patients (n = 17), GPs (n = 25), specialists (n = 3), nurses (n = 8), other caregivers (n = 2) and experts (n = 41). RESULTS: Caregivers and patients expressed a need for a comprehensive guideline on communication in end-of-life decisions. Four major communication themes were prioritised: truth telling; exploration of the patient's wishes regarding the end of life; dealing with disproportionate interventions; and dealing with requests for euthanasia in the terminal phase of life. Additional themes required special attention in the guideline: continuity of care by the GP; communication on foregoing food and fluid; and technical aspects of euthanasia. CONCLUSION: It was feasible to develop a guideline by combining the three cornerstones of evidence-based medicine: literature search, patient values and professional experience.

Advance Directives↗

Assisting with tobacco cessation.

Tobacco use is the primary preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States today. The consequences of smoking are well documented, and it is the responsibility of every health care provider to routinely screen and offer treatment to their patients who smoke. Nurses are no exception; we are uniquely qualified to provide practical skills training to our patients. Irrefutable data exist that even 3 minutes of counseling can have a positive influence that moves the patient who smokes further along the continuum toward quitting. The treatment recommendations and strategies that will be discussed are found in the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research guideline entitled "Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence." The algorithm will be broken down into practical interview questions and activities that every nurse can implement with his or her patients, regardless of practice setting.

Algorithms↗

Asthma management at Christchurch Hospital: compliance with guidelines.

AIM: To audit compliance with guidelines for the assessment and management of adult patients admitted to Christchurch Hospital with acute asthma. METHODS: An asthma admission form and management guidelines, based on international consensus statements, were designed for use by resident staff at Christchurch Hospital. Compliance with these guidelines was audited during the winter of 1994 by means of retrospective case record review. RESULTS: One hundred and forty three admissions were screened. The form was used in 99 patients (69%), of which 97 had records available for audit. Sixty two patients were admitted under general medical services and 35 under respiratory specialist services. The median age was 34 years (range 14-84) and 77% were female. The history including interval status was adequately documented in over 95% of cases. Peak flow rate was recorded on admission in 93 patients (96%) and spirometry in 62 (64%). During the acute phase of treatment 528 items were prescribed, of which 382 (72%) were appropriate according to the guidelines. The major area (55%) of nonguideline prescribing was the use of nebulised ipratropium in addition to salbutamol for mild or moderate asthma. Written evidence of asthma education was present in 42 (43%). In 34 patients (35%) there was specific reference to the introduction of an asthma action plan. Of the 33 smokers only 17 appeared to have been given smoking cessation advice. Discharge prescribing complied with the guidelines in 71%. The most common variation from the guidelines for discharge therapy related to the manner of prednisone dose reduction. The readmission rate at 1 month was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of an asthma admission form enhanced the quality of clinical data gathering by junior staff. Compliance with management guidelines was adequate. Specific sections pertaining to the use of chest radiographs, arterial blood gases and the prescribing of ipratropium and prednisone will be reviewed in updated guidelines.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of quality of care by specialist and generalist physicians as usual source of asthma care for children.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether care for children was more consistent with national asthma guidelines when a specialist rather than a generalist was the usual source of asthma care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Two large managed care organizations in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 260 parents of children with asthma. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Parent reports of the physician primarily responsible for asthma care (specialist, generalist, or both equally) and whom they would call (specialist or generalist) for questions about asthma care were used to define usual source of care. We assessed consistency of care with 1997 National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines using 11 indicators in 4 domains of asthma care: patient education, control of factors contributing to asthma symptoms, periodic physiologic assessment and monitoring, and proper use of medications. RESULTS: In all 4 domains, care was more likely to be consistent with guidelines when specialists were the usual source of care. These differences remained after adjustment for symptom severity, recent care encounters, and parent demographics. Greatest differences for specialist versus generalist management were for use of controller medications (odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5-30.4), ever having a pulmonary function test (OR 6.5; 95% CI: 2.4-18.1), and having been told about asthma triggers and how to avoid them (OR 5.9; 95% CI: 1.3-26.2). CONCLUSIONS: In these managed care organizations, asthma care in children was more likely to be consistent with national guidelines when a specialist was the primary provider. Greater use of specialists or altering generalist physicians' care may improve the degree to which the care of children with asthma is consistent with national guidelines.

Adolescent↗

Guidelines abstracted from the Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense clinical practice guideline for the management of stroke rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: To assist facilities in identifying those evidence-based processes of poststroke care that enhance measurable patient outcomes. The guideline(s) should be used by facilities (hospitals, subacute-care units and providers of long-term care) to implement a structured approach to improve rehabilitative practices and by clinicians to determine best interventions to achieve improved patient outcomes. OPTIONS: The guideline considers five elements of poststroke rehabilitation care: interdisciplinary teams; use of standardized assessments; intensity, timing, and duration of therapy; involvement of patients' families and caregivers in decision-making; and educational interventions for patients, families, and caregivers. Evidence, benefits, harms, and recommendations for each of the five designated elements and specific annotated recommendations for poststroke managements are presented separately. OUTCOMES: The overall guideline considers improvement in functional status measures as the primary outcome. Achieving community-dwelling status and preventing complications, death, and rehospitalization are also important outcomes. Costs are not specifically addressed. PARTICIPANTS: The Department of Veterans Affairs/Department of Defense (VA/DoD) Stroke Rehabilitation Working Group consisted of 28, largely VA and military hospital, representatives of medical and allied professions concerned with stroke diagnosis, management, and rehabilitation. Nine additional members with similar credentials served as the editorial committee. Technical consultation was contracted from ACS Federal Health Care, Inc., and the Center for Evidence-Based Practice, State University of New York-Upstate Medical University, Department of Family Medicine conducted evidence appraisal. Consensus was achieved over several years of facilitated group discussion and iterative evaluation of draft documents and supporting evidence. SPONSOR: The guideline was prepared under the auspices of the VA/DoD. No other source of support was identified in the document, or supporting documents.

Early Diagnosis↗