SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Catheterization”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Total joint arthroplasty and incidence of postoperative bacteriuria with an indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterization with one-dose antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective randomized trial.

This study examined the difference in postoperative bacteriuria in total joint arthroplasty after use of either an indwelling catheter or intermittent catheterization. Previous studies showed a preference for an indwelling catheter over intermittent catheterization to resolve postoperative urinary retention in total joint arthroplasty, but these studies generally used 48 hours of antibiotic prophylaxis. Increasing awareness of costs and bacterial resistance to antibiotics have prompted many centers to reduce prophylaxis to only 1 preoperative dose A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was conducted in primary total hip and primary total knee arthroplasty patients. One dose of cefazolin, 1 g, was administered intravenously immediately preoperatively. Five of 13 (38%) men in the indwelling catheter group and 0 of 14 (0%) men in the intermittent catheterization group developed postoperative bacteriuria (P =.016), and 6 of 33 (18%) women in the indwelling catheter group and 3 of 39 (8%) women in the intermittent catheterization group developed postoperative bacteriuria (not significant). A total of 11 (24%) patients in the indwelling catheter group (n = 46) and 3 (6%) patients in the intermittent catheterization group (n = 53) developed postoperative bacteriuria (P =.018). In this setting with 1-dose antibiotic prophylaxis, intermittent catheterization resulted in a lower incidence of postoperative bacteriuria compared with an indwelling catheter. For men, this difference is significant.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

PubMed1988

A prospective randomized trial of outpatient versus inpatient cardiac catheterization.

To evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient cardiac catheterization, we conducted a randomized trial at three hospitals of outpatient (n = 192) as compared with inpatient (n = 189) cardiac catheterization in low-risk patients. Outpatients had the following complication rates as compared with inpatients: hematoma, 12 versus 8.5 percent; numbness or weakness of extremity, 0.5 versus 1.6 percent; cold or blue extremity, 1.6 versus 1.1 percent; and acute myocardial infarction, 1.6 versus 0.5 percent. None of these differences were statistically significant. No deaths or strokes occurred in either group. Twenty-three patients (12 percent) assigned to the outpatient group required hospitalization because of complications of catheterization. In the outpatient group, the relative risk for hematoma was 1.42 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 2.29), and the relative risk for myocardial infarction within one week was 2.95 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.3 to 28.1). There were no significant differences between the two groups in whether they resumed normal activities or in the rates of rehospitalization within one week of the procedure. Total catheterization-related charges per patient were $679 lower for outpatients, with a savings in total hospital charges (including charges for subsequent therapeutic procedures) of $885 per patient. We conclude that elective cardiac catheterization as an outpatient procedure for selected patients is feasible and safe. Given the small size of our sample, however, we urge caution in interpreting these findings, since they do not exclude a small increase in complication rates with outpatient cardiac catheterization.

Ambulatory Care↗

PubMed1993

The association between on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators.

BACKGROUND: During the past decade the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction has substantially increased. Among the possible contributing factors, the increasing availability of cardiac catheterization facilities was the focus of our investigation. METHODS: We investigated whether the availability of cardiac catheterization facilities at an admitting hospital was associated with the likelihood that a patient would undergo coronary angiography. After adjusting for age, sex, cardiac history, and cardiac complications during hospitalization, we evaluated this association in 5867 consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to 19 Seattle-area hospitals. We also assessed the association between the presence of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Patients admitted to hospitals with on-site cardiac catheterization facilities were far more likely to undergo coronary angiography (odds ratio, 3.21; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.81 to 3.67) than patients admitted to hospitals where transfer to another institution would be required to perform cardiac catheterization. Admission to a hospital with on-site facilities was more strongly associated with the use of coronary angiography than any characteristic of the patient. Although our study had limited power to detect differences in mortality, the availability of coronary angiography had no discernible association with in-hospital mortality rates (odds ratio for mortality among patients admitted to hospitals with on-site facilities vs. patients admitted to hospitals without such facilities, 0.88; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.71 to 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: In this community-wide study, the availability of on-site cardiac catheterization facilities was associated with a higher likelihood that a patient would undergo coronary angiography. However, admission to hospitals with these facilities did not appear to be associated with lower short-term mortality.

Aged↗

PubMed1994

Absence of sex bias in the referral of patients for cardiac catheterization.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that women with clinical evidence of coronary artery disease are less often referred for cardiac catheterization than are men. To determine whether there is sex-related bias in referral for cardiac catheterization, we prospectively studied a cohort of 410 symptomatic outpatients (280 men and 130 women) who were being evaluated with exercise testing for possible-coronary artery disease. METHODS: Before the patients underwent exercise testing, 15 cardiologists from an academic medical center were asked to predict the probability that the patients they saw in the cardiology clinic would have angiographic evidence of any obstructive coronary disease (stenosis of 75 percent or more); the probability of severe coronary disease (three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease); the probability of left main coronary artery disease; and the probability of survival one, three, and five years after the evaluation. Similar predictions were generated by previously validated statistical models with use of data collected before exercise testing from the history, physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiography with the patient at rest. RESULTS: Overall, women were referred for cardiac catheterization significantly less often than men (18 percent vs. 27 percent, P = 0.03). As compared with men, women had a significantly lower pretest probability of coronary disease (as estimated by their physicians) and a lower rate of positive exercise-test results. After accounting for differences in these two factors, sex was not an independent predictor of referral for catheterization. Comparing physicians' estimates of outcome with those generated by the statistical models revealed no evidence that the physicians were underestimating the risk of coronary disease in women. Furthermore, physicians' predictions did not underestimate the probability of any obstructive coronary disease in men and women who subsequently underwent catheterization. CONCLUSIONS: Academic cardiologists made appropriately lower pretest predictions of categories of disease in women with possible coronary artery disease than in men, and these assessments, along with women's lower rate of positive exercise tests, rather than bias based on sex, accounted for the lower rate of catheterization among women.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Racial differences in the use of cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that black patients are less likely than white patients to undergo cardiac catheterization after acute myocardial infarction. The role of the race of the physician in this pattern is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, a study of Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction in 1994 and 1995, to evaluate whether differences between black patients and white patients in the use of cardiac catheterization within 60 days after acute myocardial infarction varied according to the race of their attending physician. RESULTS: Our study cohort consisted of 35,676 white and 4039 black patients with acute myocardial infarction who were treated by 17,550 white and 588 black physicians. Black patients had lower rates of cardiac catheterization than white patients, regardless of whether their attending physician was white (rate of catheterization, 38.4 percent vs. 45.7 percent; P< 0.001) or black (38.2 percent vs. 49.6 percent, P<0.001). We did not find a significant interaction between the race of the patients and the race of the physicians in the use of cardiac catheterization. The adjusted mortality rate among black patients was lower than or similar to that among white patients for up to three years after the infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in the use of cardiac catheterization are similar among patients treated by white physicians and those treated by black physicians, suggesting that this pattern of care is independent of the race of the physician.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Impact of cardiac catheterization-percutaneous coronary intervention timing on inhospital mortality.

BACKGROUND: It is more convenient and less costly to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in the catheterization laboratory after catheterization, but there is some doubt as to whether it is harmful to patients. Other studies on this topic have been hampered by small sample sizes and an inability to separate patients who underwent PCI after catheterization in the same admission from patients who underwent PCI in a subsequent admission. METHODS: Data from New York's PCI registry were used to develop a statistical model that predicted inhospital mortality based on preprocedural patient characteristics and the timing of the PCI (at same time as catheterization [combined procedure] or in the same admission as catheterization, but not at the same time [staged procedure]). The difference in mortality for the timing options was compared after adjusting for patient risk factors. RESULTS: Patients undergoing combined catheterization and PCI were more likely to have undergone a previous PCI and less likely to have had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure, a history of congestive heart failure, carotid disease, or diabetes than patients who underwent a staged procedure. After adjustment for patient risk, there were no significant differences in mortality for the 2 timing options (OR 1.14, P =.38 for combined vs staged procedures). However, patients who underwent combined procedures who had congestive heart failure in the same admission or who had Canadian Cardiovascular Society class IV had odds ratios significantly higher than congestive heart failure patients who underwent staged procedures (OR = 1.59, P =.04 and OR = 1.64, P =.04, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Combined procedures appear to have mortality as low as staged procedures on average, but are less effective for some groups of high-risk patients.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

A comparison of echocardiography and pulmonary artery catheterization for evaluation of pulmonary artery pressures in pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to compare the accuracy of echocardiography versus pulmonary artery catheterization to estimate pulmonary artery pressures in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary hypertension. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective chart review was performed between January 1990 and February 2000 for all pregnant patients with cardiac disease. Patients with pulmonary artery pressure values estimated by cardiac catheterization and echocardiography during pregnancy were included. Pulmonary hypertension is defined as pulmonary artery systolic pressure >30 mm Hg. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included in the study. There was a significant overestimation of the mean pulmonary artery pressure with echocardiography compared with catheterization (55.4 vs 51.1 mm Hg; P <.005). Of the 20 patients, pulmonary artery pressure was significantly greater when estimated by echocardiography than when measured by catheterization (59.6 vs 54.8 mm Hg; P <.004). Thirty-two percent (8/25) of the patients had pulmonary hypertension when estimated by echocardiography but had normal pulmonary artery pressures on subsequent catheterization. CONCLUSION: Echocardiography significantly overestimated pulmonary artery pressures compared with catheterization in pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension. Patients with structural cardiac defects appear to have a significantly greater difference in pulmonary artery pressures. Thirty-two percent of pregnant patients with normal pulmonary artery pressures may be misclassified as having pulmonary artery hypertension when measured by echocardiography alone.

Blood Pressure Determination↗

PubMed2001

Surgical intervention for complications caused by femoral artery catheterization in pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the risk factors and surgical management of complications caused by femoral artery catheterization in pediatric patients. METHODS: From January 1986 to March 2001, the hospital records of all children who underwent operative repairs for complications caused by femoral artery catheterization were reviewed. A prospective cardiac data bank containing 1674 catheterization procedures during the study period was used as a means of determining risk factors associated with iatrogenic femoral artery injury. RESULTS: Thirty-six operations were performed in 34 patients (age range, 1 week-17.4 years) in whom iatrogenic complications developed after either diagnostic or therapeutic femoral artery catheterizations during the study period. Non-ischemic complications included femoral artery pseudoaneurysms (n = 4), arteriovenous fistulae (n = 5), uncontrollable bleeding, and expanding hematoma (n = 4). Operative repairs were performed successfully in all patients with non-ischemic iatrogenic femoral artery injuries. In contrast, ischemic complications occurred in 21 patients. Among them, 14 patients had acute femoral ischemia and underwent surgical interventions including femoral artery thrombectomy with primary closure (n = 6), saphenous vein patch angioplasty (n = 6), and resection with primary anastomosis (n = 2). Chronic femoral artery occlusion (> 30 days) occurred in seven patients, with symptoms including either severe claudication (n = 4) or gait disturbance or limb growth impairment (n = 3). Operative treatments in these patients included ileofemoral bypass grafting (n = 5), femorofemoral bypass grafting (n = 1), and femoral artery patch angioplasty (n = 1). During a mean follow-up period of 38 months, no instances of limb loss occurred, and 84% of children with ischemic complications eventually gained normal circulation. Factors that correlated with an increased risk of iatrogenic groin complications that necessitated surgical intervention included age younger than 3 years, therapeutic intervention, number of catheterizations (>or= 3), and use of 6F or larger guiding catheter. CONCLUSION: Although excellent operative results can be achieved in cases of non-ischemic complications, acute femoral occlusion in children younger than 2 years often leads to less satisfactory outcomes. Operative intervention can provide successful outcome in children with claudication caused by chronic limb ischemia. Variables that correlated with significant iatrogenic groin complications included a young age, therapeutic intervention, earlier catheterization, and the use of a large guiding catheter.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1989

Risk of right bundle-branch block and complete heart block during pulmonary artery catheterization.

The need for the prophylactic insertion of a pacemaker before pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with pre-existing left bundle-branch block (LBBB) is controversial. To determine the incidence of new right bundle-branch block (RBBB) and complete heart block during bedside pulmonary artery catheterization, 293 patients undergoing 307 pulmonary artery catheterizations were prospectively studied. Nine patients had pacemaker rhythms and 19 patients had an RBBB on their precatheterization ECGs and therefore were excluded from analysis. In the remaining 279 pulmonary artery catheterizations, eight (3%) were associated with the development of a new RBBB. None of the 14 patients with a pre-existing LBBB developed complete heart block. The incidence of complete heart block during pulmonary artery catheterization of patients with previous LBBB was not higher than the incidence of RBBB in patients without underlying conduction defects. Because of the rare but grave consequences of RBBB in patients with pre-existing LBBB, we recommend the use of standby external pacemakers and equipment for transvenous pacemaker insertion in these patients during pulmonary artery catheterization. We do not recommend prophylactic pacemaker insertion.

Bundle-Branch Block↗

PubMed1992

Evaluation of right heart catheterization in critically ill patients. Ontario Intensive Care Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To determine physicians' assessment of the therapeutic effect and patient benefit of data obtained from right heart catheterization. DESIGN: Before/after study. SETTING: One medical and one surgical academic ICU in two medical centers. PATIENTS: A total of 107 critically ill patients with uncertain hemodynamic status. DATA COLLECTION: Physicians looking after the patients were asked to evaluate the extent to which results of right heart catheterization resulted in changes in therapy and outcome. The same questions were asked of academic intensivists, two of whom reviewed each chart. RESULTS: Agreement regarding whether right heart catheterization had changed therapy was poor (chance corrected agreement [kappas] of -0.02 to 0.33). Treating physicians were more inclined than chart reviewers to conclude that management changes based on right heart catheterization improved outcome. Agreement on which patients benefited was poor (kappas of 0.03 to 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' assessment of the effect of right heart catheterization on treatment decisions and patient outcomes is not reliable. Credible information regarding the benefits of right heart catheterization will require randomized trials.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

PubMed1999

Concurrent improvements in ambulatory cardiac catheterization practices following inpatient interventions.

Questions have been increasingly raised about the value of performing right heart catheterization. A preliminary analysis done in 1992 revealed significant interhospital variation in the frequency of the procedure among Medicare Part A and Medicaid patients in New York State, and it also suggested that the procedure was being performed routinely in some hospitals. In 1993, IPRO initiated a cooperative health care quality improvement program involving the state's 53 catheterization laboratories. As a result of this educational intervention, the rate of bilateral catheterization among Medicare Part A patients fell from 89/100,000 beneficiaries in 1992 to 65/100,000 in 1996, and the overall percentage of catheterized Medicare patients undergoing bilateral catheterization fell from 30.5% in 1992 to 17.4%. A major question was whether a corresponding decrease had occurred among ambulatory patients (Medicare Part B). To determine the answer, the Medicare Part B database was analyzed for the identical period of time. It was found that the percentage of ambulatory Medicare patients who underwent bilateral catheterization at the 53 laboratories fell from 37.6% in 1992 to 17.0% in 1996, paralleling the decline observed among inpatients. The results of this quality improvement study show that an educational intervention directed at inpatient practice patterns can have a similar impact on outpatient patterns.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗

PubMed1995

Clean intermittent catheterization in spinal cord injury patients: long-term followup of a hydrophilic low friction technique.

Clean intermittent self-catheterization is an established option in bladder management of spinal cord injury patients. Several early and a small number of long-term studies have reported good preventive or therapeutic effects on hydronephrosis, vesicourethral reflux, urinary tract infection and incontinence. Most reports describe the use of small catheters and liberal use of jelly but urethral complications, such as strictures and false passages, seem to increase with the length of followup. All 30 spinal cord injury patients in this retrospective study had used disposable hydrophilic, low friction catheters from the early shock phase to a median of 7 years (range 5 to 9). There were 26 upper motor neuron and 4 lower motor neuron lesions. After tap water soaking, the surface layer of the catheter coating has a friction constant more than 10 times lower than that for a regular plastic catheter (Nélaton) with chlorhexidine jelly. There was no hydronephrosis, pyelonephritis or renal scarring. In 3 patients who had decreased the clean intermittent self-catheterization regimen, signs of upper tract dilatation developed but the excretory urogram returned to normal after correction of the regimen. Of 30 patients 12 (40%) maintained sterile urine, while 4 of the remaining 18 with bacteriuria had episodes of urinary sepsis and chronic infections. Two patients had epididymitis. Of 6 men with occasional insertion difficulties when the clean intermittent self-catheterization regimen started after the indwelling catheter had been removed 4 showed yielding signs of strictures during the subsequent clean intermittent self-catheterization regimen. In 1 patient 2 dilation attempts had failed but the patient can perform the clean intermittent self-catheterization regimen. One patient with Crohn's disease had advanced urethral changes in the acute phase but could perform clean intermittent self-catheterization with a small catheter. One patient has had recurrent modifications of the urethral wall but no development of a false passage. The study indicates that patients who use hydrophilic low friction low friction catheters do as well as or better than patients using conventional catheters. Above all, there is no increase in severe urethral complications with time after injury. Progression towards strictures after early urethral trauma seems to be preventable by the use of this catheter.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The role of selective salpingography and tubal catheterization in the management of the infertile couple.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review is intended to update the reader about recent developments in the field of selective salpingography and tubal catheterization, to offer an interpretation of the information presented and to suggest further research links. RECENT FINDINGS: The measurement of tubal perfusion pressures at selective salpingography and tubal catheterization has offered a new dimension in the evaluation of the fallopian tube. A classification of infertile women based on tubal perfusion pressures is presented, and this is correlated with the possibility of spontaneous fertility, thus giving selective salpingography and tubal catheterization a prognostic profile in addition to diagnostic and therapeutic functions. Experience derived from the use of the technique in unselected infertile women (i.e. not with proximal tubal blockage) is presented. The use of selective tube catheterization for sterilization purposes joins the mainstream with the publication of the encouraging results of a multinational trial. The debate on the validity of the diagnosis of proximal tubal blockage is enriched by the suggestion that simply rotating the patient during hysterosalpingography will resolve most cases of the condition. The fertility gain by single-tube recanalization in women with unilateral proximal tubal blockage is given further support. The use of oil-based media for selective salpingography and tubal catheterization is discussed. A hypothesis on the pathophysiology of proximal tubal blockage is presented. SUMMARY: The evidence clearly supports the use of selective salpingography and tubal catheterization for infertile women with proximal tubal blockage. The potential of the technique to play a wider role in the management of infertility is demonstrated by recent research.

Catheterization↗

PubMed2005

Recent advances in non-interventional pediatric cardiac catheterization.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The role of cardiac catheterization in pediatric cardiology has changed significantly in the past 10-15 years. As interventional procedures dominate the field, it is important to examine the recent advances in non-interventional pediatric cardiac catheterization. RECENT FINDINGS: Meaningful and accurate data must be acquired for the presurgical evaluation of patients with congenital heart disease to better guide clinical decisions. In particular, all patients with single- ventricle physiology currently undergo diagnostic catheterization before bidirectional Glenn and Fontan surgeries. Recent studies are beginning to identify a subset of these patients who may not need to undergo presurgical catheterization. As surgical techniques evolve, diagnostic catheterization has a role in the analysis of hemodynamic variables and clinical outcomes. This can be seen in recent papers that examine the Sano modification to the Norwood procedure.Recent papers demonstrate the continued development of new techniques, new technology, and a progression towards smaller equipment. The use of conductance catheters, Doppler flow wires, and smaller traditional catheters will allow the pediatric cardiologist to more accurately and safely evaluate hemodynamic parameters. SUMMARY: Non-interventional pediatric cardiac catheterization continues to have an important role in the assessment and treatment of patients with congenital heart disease.

Cardiac Catheterization↗

PubMed2004

Management of postoperative urinary retention: a randomized trial of in-out versus overnight catheterization.

BACKGROUND: There has been no consensus on the best catheterization strategy for the management of postoperative urinary retention. A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to establish the best practice guidelines for the management of postoperative urinary retention. The authors also evaluated the contemporary incidence of urinary retention following different categories of general surgery and examined risk factors associated with its occurrence. METHODS: All patients who underwent elective inpatient surgery between January 2002 and June 2003 were recruited into the study. Patients who developed postoperative urinary retention were randomized to either having in-out catheterization or placement of an indwelling catheter for 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 1448 patients was recruited. The overall incidence of urinary retention was 4.1% (n = 60). Significant risk factors associated with postoperative urinary retention included old age, anorectal procedures and use of spinal anaesthesia. Comparison of re-catheterization and urinary tract infection rates between patients who were treated with in-out versus overnight catheterization found no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative urinary retention should be managed by in-out catheterization. Indwelling catheterization for 24 h appeared to bestow no additional benefits. The incidence of urinary retention increases with age, anorectal procedures and the use of spinal anaesthesia.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1975

Serum CPK isoenzymes after cardiac catheterization.

Exclusion of acute myocardial infarction preoperatively, particularly in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, is an important requirement for optimal results following coronary revascularization. Unfortunately, activity of conventionally measured serum enzymes (AST, LDH, total CPK) is frequently raised because of enzyme released from non-cardiac sources during the catheterization procedure. however, serum activity of the MB CPK isoenzyme, an isoenzyme found primarily in heart muscle, appears to be more specific. Accordingly, in the present study, total CPK and MB CPK activities were determined in serum samples from 53 patients undergoing diagnostic catheterization, immediately before study and serially for 24 hours afterwards. A comprehensive range of catheterization procedures included selective coronary arteriography in 39 patients by brachial (17) or femoral (22) artery approaches. Myocardial infarction was excluded by clinical and electrocardiographic criteria in all patients before and after the procedure. MB CPK isoenzyme activity was also measured in serum samples from 50 patients with actue myocardial infarction documented electrocardiographically, and in 20 controls admitted to hospital but without cardiovascular disease. In patients with acute myocardial infarction, both total CPK and MB CPK isoenzyme levels were significantly raised (0.78 +/- 0.087 and 0.086 +/- 0.037 IU/ml, respectively), exceeding the upper limit of normal in all cases. MB CPK activity remained within normal limits (less than 0.004 IU/ml) in all 20 subjects without cardiovascular disease. Peak total serum CPK activity exceeded control levels in all patients undergoing catheterization (0.260 +/- 0.033). However, in each case, MB CPK isoenzyme activity remained within normal limits (less than .004). Thus, in contrast to an increase of activity of conventionally used serum enzymes, increased MB CPK isoenzyme activity is a reliable indicator of myocardial infarction, even in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Fetoscopic and open transumbilical fetal cardiac catheterization in sheep. Potential approaches for human fetal cardiac intervention.

BACKGROUND: Shortening the prenatal disease course of severe aortic and pulmonary stenoses by balloon valvuloplasty may diminish their postnatal expression. The purpose of this study in fetal sheep was to assess the feasibility of fetoscopic and open transumbilical fetal cardiac catheterization guided by fetal transesophageal echocardiography to provide alternative approaches for human fetal cardiac intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied a total of nine fetal sheep (95 to 103 days of gestation; term = 145 to 150 days) and performed transumbilical fetal cardiac catheterization by a minimally invasive fetoscopic (n = 6) or an open fetal surgical approach (n = 3). Monitored by fetal transesophageal echocardiography, with an 8F or 10F, 10-MHz intravascular ultrasound catheter we placed guidewires and interventional catheters via the umbilical arterial route into the fetal heart. In three of the fetuses, we created supravalvar pulmonary artery stenosis by open fetal cardiac surgery After fetal and maternal recovery, we exteriorized these fetuses and performed open transumbilical fetal cardiac catheterization with successful pulmonary arterial angioplasty in two. Three fetuses survived fetoscopic transumbilical catheterization for 1 or 2 days and died most likely of blood loss after sheath dislodgment (n = 1) or removal (n = 2). By securing the sheath insertion site with a suture, we prevented sheath dislodgment and minimized bleeding during sheath removal in three fetuses. These fetuses then survived fetoscopic transumbilical fetal cardiac catheterization for 1 to 2 weeks before being killed. CONCLUSIONS: This study in fetal sheep demonstrates that fetoscopic and open transumbilical fetal cardiac catheterization are feasible and, guided by fetal transesophageal echocardiography, provide potential alternative approaches for human fetal cardiac intervention.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗

PubMed2006

A randomized, controlled trial of sucrose analgesia in infants younger than 90 days of age who require bladder catheterization in the pediatric emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an oral sucrose solution improves pain response for infants undergoing bladder catheterization in an emergency department (ED) population. METHODS: A randomized, double-blinded study comparing the analgesic effects of a sucrose solution to placebo for infants < or = 90 days of age and requiring bladder catheterization. Infants with prior bladder catheterization, previous painful procedures that day, or neurological or genital abnormalities were excluded. Infants were assigned baseline pain scores and then given 2 mL of sucrose or water 2 minutes before catheterization. Trained pediatric ED nurses rated the infants for pain, presence of cry, and time to return to baseline. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were enrolled; 40 were randomized to sucrose, and 40, to placebo. Baseline pain scores were similar within each age group. Overall, sucrose did not produce a significant analgesic effect. In subgroup analysis, infants 1-30 days of age receiving sucrose showed a smaller change in pain scores (2.9 vs. 5.3, p = 0.035), were less likely to cry with catheterization (29% vs. 72%, p = 0.008), and returned to baseline more rapidly after catheter removal (10 seconds vs. 37 seconds, p = 0.04) compared with infants who received placebo. Infants older than 30 days of age who received sucrose did not show statistically significant differences in pain scores, crying, or time to return to baseline behavior. CONCLUSIONS: There was no overall treatment effect when using an oral sucrose solution before bladder catheterization in infants younger than 90 days of age. However, infants younger than or equal to 30 days of age who received sucrose had smaller increases in pain scores, less crying, and returned to baseline more rapidly than infants receiving placebo. Older infants did not show an improved pain response with oral sucrose.

Administration, Oral↗