SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

PubMed1989

Which one first? Barium enema or colonoscopy.

Barium enema and colonoscopy share common problems, including patient preparation and cooperation, technical difficulties in reaching the cecum, and variables relating to the expertise of the person performing the procedure. On the other hand, it has been well documented that colonoscopy has the advantage of detecting a larger number of lesions and smaller lesions, and the ability to be therapeutic as well as diagnostic. Colonoscopy also guides the surgeon in doing proper resections, based on tissue diagnoses, in cases when there are several lesions in different locations in colon. When colon lesions are suspected, barium enema as the first diagnostic procedure means that the patient must undergo a second bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy. Thus, instead of using colonoscopy to confirm or rule out the findings, the most logical approach is to do colonoscopy first, which avoids the repetition of bowel preparation and the cost of barium enema. If colonoscopy cannot be performed, or cannot be completed to the cecum, then the next best choice is to proceed to double contrast barium enema.

Adult↗

PubMed1984

Colonoscopy in childhood.

A review was made of 139 fiberoptic colonoscopies performed between 1975 and 1982 on 113 patients aged 1 month to 20 years. General anesthesia was used in four procedures. All others were done under sedation with meperidine (mean dose 2.9 mg/kg) and diazepam (mean dose 0.5 mg/kg). Indications were rectal bleeding in 52 patients; assessment and surveillance of known inflammatory bowel disease in 33 patients; and diagnostic evaluation of abdominal pain, diarrhea, and/or fever in 28 patients. The cecum was reached in 84% of diagnostic examinations. Comparison of findings on colonoscopy with barium enema in 75 patients showed agreement in 46, colonoscopic superiority in 25, and barium enema superiority in four. Bleeding sufficient to cause anemia was seen in 10/26 patients with polyps. Five minor complications and no major complications occurred. Flexible fiberoptic colonoscopy and polypectomy may be done usefully in childhood by physicians well versed and experienced with these procedures. Colonoscopy and biopsy changed the radiographic diagnosis from ulcerative colitis to Crohn's disease in several cases and indicated greater extent of colonic disease in several cases of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Colonoscopy is usually the most sensitive and accurate diagnostic tool for the evaluation of colonic disease, but barium enema and colonoscopy are complementary tests and barium enema should usually precede colonoscopy, with certain exceptions.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1995

A study of the safety and clinical efficacy of flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy after recent colonic surgery in 52 patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the safety of lower endoscopy after colonic surgery, which has been unstudied and unknown. Endoscopy could promote suture breakdown at sites of colonic anastomoses, ostia, or repair by colonic abrasion or stretch from endoscopic intubation, torque, and insufflation. METHODS: Risks versus benefits of lower endoscopy performed within 3 wk of colonic surgery were retrospectively analyzed at five medical centers in 36 patients undergoing sigmoidoscopy and 72 age-and-sex-matched controls, and in 16 patients undergoing colonoscopy and 32 age-and-sex-matched controls. RESULTS: Sigmoidoscopy indications included rectal bleeding in 14, distal colonic obstruction in 12, and other in 10. Sigmoidoscopy provided the diagnosis in 18 (54%) of 33 cases (excluding three therapeutic sigmoidoscopies, control rate = 30%, p < 0.01, X2, including colon cancer in six and benign stricture in five. Sigmoidoscopy led to colonic surgery in nine and medical therapy changes in four. Colonoscopy indications included colonic bleeding in seven, colonic obstruction in five, and other in four. Colonoscopy provided the diagnosis in nine (56%, control rate = 56%, NS, X2). Colonoscopy led to colonic surgery in three and chemotherapy in one. Two endoscopic complications, unrelated to suture breakdown, occurred: An acutely ill patient developed hypotension during sigmoidoscopy which resolved with intravenous fluid resuscitation. A contained sigmoid diverticular perforation became a free perforation (requiring laparotomy) after colonoscopy. Both control groups had no endoscopic complications (NS, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: In this study, the benefits outweighed the risks of postoperative sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. Clinicians should use discretion and perform colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy after colonic surgery, particularly bowel anastomosis, only for clinically important indications. Endoscopy is contraindicated when colonic wound dehiscence or bowel perforation is suspected.

Colon↗

PubMed1994

Safety of surveillance colonoscopy in long-standing ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: Because of the increased risk of colorectal cancer in patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis, colonoscopic surveillance for the detection of dysplasia is currently recommended as a method of identifying high-risk patients. However, the hazard of colonoscopy with multiple biopsies in such patients is not well known. Our objective was to assess the safety of surveillance colonoscopy in patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis. METHODS: To accomplish our objective, we conducted a retrospective analysis of results and follow-up of surveillance colonoscopies. RESULTS: A total of 6,727 biopsies were obtained during 384 colonoscopies, with a median of 17 biopsies per colonoscopy. Nineteen studies were performed in a setting of underlying stricture. A single complication of a silent perforation occurred in a patient with an underlying stricture. No instances of bleeding, infection, respiratory distress, myocardial infarction, or death resulted from the procedure. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that surveillance colonoscopy with multiple biopsies is a relatively safe procedure. Given increasing evidence of the survival benefit derived from the procedure, we believe these results render further support for the current practice of surveillance colonoscopy in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Clues to patient dissatisfaction with conscious sedation for colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Most colonoscopy is performed using conscious sedation to facilitate the procedure. However, little is known about which patients are dissatisfied with sedation and why. The goal of this study was to examine whether certain patient- and procedure-specific variables are associated with patient dissatisfaction. METHODS: A total of 403 consecutive outpatients underwent colonoscopy during a 4-month study period. Of 342 patients who met entrance criteria, 328 completed the initial questionnaire and were enrolled. Subjects received standard conscious sedation; after colonoscopy, the primary endoscopist and nurse recorded the level of sedation as adequate or inadequate. Twenty-four to 72 hr after the procedure, an independent observer contacted the subjects by telephone and asked whether they were satisfied with the level of sedation achieved during the colonoscopy. A number of patient- (age, gender, anxiety level, and educational background) and procedure-specific variables (waiting time and procedure type, difficulty, and duration) were analyzed to determine their association with patient dissatisfaction. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (15%) were dissatisfied with sedation. Univariable analysis showed that females, anxiety, higher education (at least 1 yr of college), procedure duration > or = 60 min, and procedure difficulty were all associated with the dissatisfaction with sedation (p < 0.05). Multivariable analysis revealed that only higher education (p = 0.009) and longer procedure duration (p = 0.018) were associated with patient dissatisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Highly educated patients and those who underwent longer procedures were more likely to be dissatisfied with conscious sedation used for colonoscopy. A thorough discussion of expectations and/or patient-controlled sedation might improve satisfaction with colonoscopy in educated patients. Regular supplementation of sedation, termination of a lengthy procedure with the offer of a further attempt at a later date, and referral to a more experienced endoscopist when appropriate might all improve patient satisfaction with colonoscopy.

Anxiety↗

PubMed1994

Two-year incidence of colon adenomas developing after tandem colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: We attempted to determine an accurate frequency of new polyp growth in a cohort of veteran male patients who were initially cleared of polyps by tandem colonoscopy. METHODS: Followup colonoscopy was performed 2 yr after tandem colonoscopy. A polyp was categorized as "new" if it was not located in a segment of the colon or rectum that had harbored a neoplastic polyp of the same histology at tandem colonoscopy, in contradistinction to lesions designated as "same-segment" polyps. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 90 patients who had tandem colonoscopy as a part of a previous study were available for follow-up colonoscopy for 2 yr. Ninety-one percent had a history of benign neoplastic polyps or cancer. Neoplastic polyps were documented in 52% (95% CI, 45-74%) of patients at followup, and 38% (95% CI, 26-52%) were found to have a total of 31 "new" lesions. All new lesions were tubular adenomas. The largest number of new polyps in an individual patient was four, and the largest new lesion was 20 mm in size with a flat, linear configuration. Most (25/31) new polyps were < or = 5 mm, and the number of neoplastic polyps per patient at follow-up was less than at tandem colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-half of older, male patients with a history of neoplastic polyps will demonstrate neoplastic polyps at 2 yr. In at least one-third of patients, these appear to be new lesions. In some patients, de novo neoplastic polyps can grow to > or = 1 cm within 2 yr.

Adenoma↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Colonoscopy in the elderly: a study of 200 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate tolerance and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in elderly patients. METHODS: We studied retrospectively 200 consecutive colonoscopies performed in patients older than 80 years (mean age: 83.5 +/- 3.1). We analyzed the following factors: indication, type and tolerance of the preparation, analgesia, tolerance of the procedure, information provided by the examination and therapeutic consequences. RESULTS: The indications were: anaemia in 81 cases, change in bowel habits in 58 cases, rectal bleeding in 26 cases and others in 35 cases. Preparation (4.2 +/- 1.3 L Polyethylene-glycol) was good 150 times (75%), moderate 27 times and poor 23 times. It was tolerated well 122 times (61%) and poorly 78 times (39%). Sixty-six colonoscopies were performed without any analgesia, diazanalgesia was used in 108 cases, general anesthesia in 8 and diazepam and/or antispasmodics in 18. Tolerance of colonoscopy was good in 140 cases (70%), moderate in 37 cases and poor in 23 cases. Tolerance was better with analgesia than without (p < 0.001). The caecum was reached in 167 cases (83.5%). Colonoscopy was normal in 68 cases (34%). The lesions discovered were: 40 polyps larger than 10 mm, 41 diverticulosis, 29 cancers, 7 ischaemic colitis, 5 angiodysplasias, 5 sigmoiditis, 3 villous adenomas, 1 Bothriocephalus and 1 thermometric ulceration. A lesion responsible for the symptoms was diagnosed in 80 cases (40%). Diagnostic yield was better when indication was anaemia (52%) than change in bowel habits (24%) (p < 0.001). The lesions were treated endoscopically in 41 cases (38 polypectomies, 3 electrocoagulations) and surgically in 22 cases. Colonoscopy as well as its preparation were well tolerated in 93 cases (46.5%). CONCLUSION: In a selected elderly population, colonoscopy was better tolerated with analgesia; large bowel preparation was often difficult. The diagnostic yield was relatively good. A multicentric prospective study is underway in order to determine the predictive criterias allowing an improvement of colonoscopic yield in the elderly.

Aged↗

PubMed1995

[Colonic perforations complicating colonoscopy. Apropos of 15 consecutive cases observed over 16 years].

OBJECTIVES: Our study was undertaken to better assess the circumstances of perforation during colonoscopy. METHODS: All cases observed in our department between 1978 and 1994 were computer recorded. During this period, 5,822 colonoscopies were performed, including 872 with at least one polypectomy. RESULTS: All perforations occurred during colonoscopies performed under anaesthesia (n = 3,373 vs 2,449 without anaesthesia). There were a total of 15 observations of colonic perforations, 1 perforation in 388 colonoscopies. Ten perforations occurred during diagnostic colonoscopies (0.20%), 5 after polypectomy (0.57%). Eight of 10 perforations complicating diagnostic colonoscopies occurred below an impassable stricture. Two patients died from this complication (0.03% of all colonoscopies). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that endoscopic exploration of colonic stricture, in addition to anaesthesia, increases the risk of colonic perforation.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Clinical variables associated with colorectal cancer on colonoscopy: a prediction model.

OBJECTIVES: We prospectively evaluated the ability of various indications for colonoscopy to predict colorectal cancer. METHODS: Indications and findings were prospectively recorded for 1223 consecutive colonoscopies performed during an 18-month period at a University Hospital. Colonoscopies performed on 981 patients for indications which included colorectal cancer in the differential diagnosis were included in the study. A group of 653 patients was randomly selected to derive a model predictive of colorectal cancer at colonoscopy; the remaining 328 patients were used to validate the model. RESULTS: Colorectal cancer was found in 44/981 patients (4.5%). Univariate analysis of the derivation set showed that age > 55, occult bleed, anemia, iron deficiency, weight loss, and abnormal CT scan were associated with finding colorectal cancer at colonoscopy in the derivation set, p < 0.05. History of polyps was negatively associated with finding colorectal cancer. Stepwise selection was used to develop a predictive model by using three independent variables-age > 55, iron deficiency, and weight loss. Assigning a score of 1 to each variable, cancer was present in 0% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 0-0.6%], 5.3% (95% CI, 2.3-8.3%), and 17.9% (95% CI, 4.8-31%) of patients in the validation sample with a score of 0, 1, and > or = 2, respectively (p < 0.001 by chi2 for trend). The model was predictive of finding colorectal cancer at colonoscopy, independent of the location or stage of the cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Age, iron deficiency, and weight loss are important independent predictors of colorectal cancer in patients referred for colonoscopy.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of the barium-enema examination and colonoscopy in diagnosis of colonic cancer.

The diagnostic value of colonoscopy was investigated in 123 patients with certain or questionable cancer of the colon as demonstrated by an ordinary barium-enema examination. The diagnosis was revised by laparotomy or clinical follow-up studies in cases of patients having no operation. The following conclusions were deduced: 1) The number of unnecessary laparotomies may be reduced by doing colonoscopy in patients with certain or questionable cancer of the colon as demonstrated by ordinary barium-enema studies. 2) The gain in diagnostic value of adding a colonoscopy to a barium-enema examination is more pronounced in patients with questionable than in those with certain cancer as visualized by the barium-enema studies. 3) The risk of missing a cancer of the colon during colonoscopy is very small if an experienced examiner looking for cancer performs the colonoscopy. 4) Colonoscopy is of little diagnostic value in cases of patients who have radiologic evidence of stenosis of the sigmoid colon. 5) The number of patients selected for colonoscopy on the basis of radiologic evidence suggesting cancer probably can be reduced by refinement of the barium-enema examination.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy.

PURPOSE: Reports of virtual colonoscopy demonstrate sensitivity similar to that of conventional colonoscopy for polyps 5 mm or larger, suggesting the validity of its use for colorectal cancer screening. Critical to the success of either procedure is the ability to evaluate the entire colon. Cecal intubation rates during diagnostic or screening colonoscopies vary from 53 to 99 percent. We describe the added value of using a gastroscope to perform a colonoscopic examination that would otherwise result in an incomplete colonoscopy. METHODS: From January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2002 a total of 1,979 colonoscopies were performed. A gastroscope was used in 1.3 percent (n = 26) of these colonoscopies in an effort to complete the index examination initially started with a standard or pediatric colonoscope. The success rate was defined as intubating proximal to the initial area of impasse and entering the cecum. RESULTS: Cecal intubation was achieved in 62 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy, the gastroscope can usually advance through the initial area of impasse with a cecal intubation rate of 62 percent.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact?

BACKGROUND & AIMS: When optimized, virtual colonoscopy may be highly sensitive for colorectal neoplasia. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of virtual colonoscopy screening (VC) vs. colonoscopy screening (COLO) and the potential impact at the national level. METHODS: Using a Markov model, we estimated the clinical and economic consequences of VC and COLO from ages 50 to 80 years. Using census data, we made projections to the national level. RESULTS: In the best case considered (95%, 94%, and 87% sensitivity for colorectal cancer [CRC], polyps > or =10 mm, and polyps <10 mm), VC was nearly as effective as COLO. However, if test costs were equal, total cost per person was 15% greater for VC than COLO, making COLO dominant. When test cost for VC was < or =60% of test cost for COLO, the small benefit of COLO vs. VC cost >200,000 US dollars/incremental life-year. The greater the likelihood of being referred for colonoscopy after VC, the greater the advantage of COLO. With 75% screening adherence in the United States, VC and COLO could decrease CRC incidence by 46%-54%, with COLO requiring 6.9 million colonoscopies/yr, and VC, 3.2 million colonoscopies/yr, plus 5.4 million virtual colonoscopies/yr with VC. CONCLUSIONS: Even if screening test sensitivities were similar, COLO is likely to be preferred over VC unless virtual colonoscopy costs significantly less than colonoscopy. VC may be most appropriate in persons unlikely to need colonoscopy, such as those at low CRC risk. If VC were substituted for COLO, the demand on resources would shift from endoscopic to radiologic services, but would not diminish.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine the current opinions regarding the performance, interpretation, reporting, and clinical role of virtual colonoscopy among a group of selected experts to develop a consensus statement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 33 selected experts in virtual colonoscopy. Responses were tabulated and results were used to develop a consensus statement. The results of the questionnaire and consensus statement were sent to respondents for comment and approval. RESULTS: Thirty-one (93.9%) of 33 surveys were returned. Eighty-seven percent (27/31) of respondents believe virtual colonoscopy is a credible screening method. Oral sodium phosphate solution is the laxative preferred by more than 66% (18/27), whereas 62% (13/21) do not believe fecal tagging is necessary. All respondents (25/25) think that both prone and supine imaging is required, with most (81%, 21/26) believing IV contrast material is not necessary. The routine use of spasmolytics is suggested by only 15% (4/26). The largest acceptable slice thickness of 3 mm is agreed on by 88% (22/25). All respondents believe screening virtual colonoscopy should be performed at a lower dose per slice than conventional CT. Most (80%, 20/25) believe the optimum method of interpreting virtual colonoscopy should be primary axial review, with 3D used for problem solving. All but one respondent (96%, 26/27) agree there is a threshold size below which polyps are not clinically important. When reporting virtual colonoscopy results, 59% (16/27) believe polyps less than 4 mm need not be reported. CONCLUSION: A consensus is developing among experts as to the appropriate manner in which virtual colonoscopy should be performed, interpreted, and reported.

Colonography, Computed Tomographic↗

PubMed2002

Risk factors associated with changes in oxygenation and pulse rate during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although hypoxemia is a relatively common complication of colonoscoy, the possible predictive factors of oxygen desaturation and tachycardia in patients undergoing this procedure are not well known. In this study, the possible predictive factors of severe oxygen desaturation (SaO2<90%) and tachycardia in patients with undergoing colonoscopy were investigated. METHODS: A total of 79 consecutive patients were evaluated in the study (46 men and 33 women). Significant oxygen desaturation was considered to be a reduction of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) to less than 90%. Tachycardia was defined as a heart rate above 100/min. Patients with inadequate colonoscopy were excluded from the study. The incidence of arterial hemoglobin oxygen desaturation and changes of heart rate during colonoscopy were evaluated and clinical factors in relation to these findings were assessed. RESULTS: The SaO2 during colonoscopy fell below 90% in 19 of the 79 patients (24.1%). The risk factors for desaturation were advanced (>60yr) age (OR: 6.03; 95% CI, 1.35-26.99), receiving sedation (OR: 11.42; 95% CI, 2.05-63.49), chronic lung disease (OR: 4.54; 95% CI and 1.40-11.68), and obesity (OR: 8.95; 95% CI, 1.17-68.55). The presence of hypertension and anemia, a history of cigarette smoking and duration of the colonoscopy had no significant effect on arterial oxygen desaturation (p>0.05). The pulse rate was raised above 100/min during colonoscopy in 26 of 79 patients (32.9%). lncrease in heart rate was found to be related to arterial oxygen desaturation (OR: 13.72; 95% CI, 2.67-70.32), anemia (OR:6.17; 95% CI, 1.15-32.91) and advanced (>60 yr) age (OR: 6.08; 95% CI, 1.62-22.81). Gender, sedation, obesity, hypertension, chronic lung disease and smoking did not affect the heart rate (p>0.05). Two patients had transitional bradyarrythmia, which had no relationship with the parameters studied. There was no incidence of significant hypoxia or change in heart rate which might have caused termination of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Benign and transient arterial oxygen desaturation and tachycardia may occur during colonoscopy procedure. Sedation, obesity, advanced age and chronic lung disease might contribute to these adverse events.

Journal Article↗

PubMed1986

Colonoscopy as a primary diagnostic procedure in chronic gastrointestinal tract bleeding.

We compared the use of barium enema (BE) and colonoscopy in evaluating patients with chronic gastrointestinal tract bleeding by dividing into three groups 329 consecutive colonoscopies and 207 consecutive BE examinations done with chronic gastrointestinal tract bleeding as an indication. In the first group, of 96 patients with negative results of BE studies, subsequent colonoscopy showed carcinoma of the colon in 16%, polyps larger than 1 cm in 21%, and other causes in 20%. In 43% the colonoscopy gave negative results or was incomplete. In the other two groups we directly compared findings of the 207 BE and the 233 remaining colonoscopies when each was used as a primary diagnostic test. Colonoscopy was found to have fewer negative results (74% vs 43%), fewer inconclusive examinations requiring repeat (19% vs 3%), and more positive correct findings to explain the cause of bleeding (54% vs 5%).

Barium Sulfate↗

PubMed2006

Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients: prevalence of neoplasia and estimated impact on life expectancy.

CONTEXT: Current guidelines do not include an upper age cutoff for colorectal cancer screening with colonoscopy. Although the prevalence of colonic neoplasia increases with age, life expectancy decreases. Thus, the benefit of screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients may be limited. OBJECTIVE: To compare estimated life-years saved with screening colonoscopy in very elderly vs younger persons. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study conducted among 1244 asymptomatic individuals in 3 age groups (50-54 years [n = 1034], 75-79 years [n = 147], and > or =80 years [n = 63]) who underwent screening colonoscopy at a US teaching hospital and clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of various types of colon neoplasia; estimated gain in life expectancy, calculated as life expectancy--(life expectancy during polyp lag time + life expectancy after colorectal cancer diagnosis); and comparison of mean gain in life expectancy across the 3 groups. Life expectancy and mortality data were derived from life tables, previous studies, and national databases. RESULTS: The prevalence of neoplasia was 13.8% in the 50- to 54-year-old group, 26.5% in the 75- to 79-year-old group, and 28.6% in the group aged 80 years or older. Despite higher prevalence of neoplasia in elderly patients, mean extension in life expectancy was much lower in the group aged 80 years or older than in the 50- to 54-year-old group (0.13 vs 0.85 years). In sensitivity analysis, with longer polyp lag times the mean extension in life expectancy decreased more in the elderly than in the younger patients; alternatively, if it was assumed that a smaller proportion of adenomas progress to colorectal cancer, the mean extension in life expectancy decreased less in the elderly than in the younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: Even though prevalence of neoplasia increases with age, screening colonoscopy in very elderly persons (aged > or =80 years) results in only 15% of the expected gain in life expectancy in younger patients. Screening colonoscopy in very elderly patients should be performed only after careful consideration of potential benefits, risks, and patient preferences.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Colonoscopy for intermittent rectal bleeding: impact on patient management.

Rectal bleeding is a frequent presenting symptom of a number of benign anorectal disorders. However, it may also be a warning sign of more significant gastrointestinal pathology. For this reason, full colonic evaluation has been recommended in patients with intermittent bright red rectal bleeding. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the utility of colonoscopy in this setting. Data were prospectively collected on 125 colonoscopies performed on the surgical service at the Cleveland Wade Park Veterans Administration Medical Center during a two year period. During this period 33 patients underwent colonoscopy for the evaluation of intermittent bright red rectal bleeding. Fourteen patients had abnormal rectal exams, including hemorrhoids in 9, mass lesions in 3, prolapse in 1, and fistula in ano in 1. Colonoscopy was normal in only 7 (21%) of the 33 patients examined. Findings in the remaining 26 included 31 polyps in 14 patients, cancer in 3, AVM in 1, diverticula in 9, hemorrhoids in 4, and other benign lesions in 5. Positive findings on rectal examination had no relationship to findings at endoscopy, with abnormal findings in 52% of patients with normal rectal exams and in 27% of patients with abnormal rectal exams (P = 0.187, NS). Findings at colonoscopy resulted in a change in management in 16 (48%) of patients examined. In patients with intermittent rectal bleeding, the entire colon should be evaluated regardless of findings on rectal examination, as a significant number of patients will have concomitant findings. Colonoscopy is an excellent method for colonic evaluation in this setting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1988

Conceptual developments through colonoscopy.

Fiberoptic colonoscopy is 25 years old this year. Improvement in instruments led rapidly to wide acceptance of colonoscopy in diagnosis and therapy of colorectal diseases. The diagnosis of benign and malignant neoplasms was revolutionized by colonoscopy. The differential diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, assessment of its extent and severity, response to treatment, and potential for development of cancer are all made easier by colonoscopy. Colonoscopy has improved the diagnosis of diverticular disease, rectal bleeding, identification of ischemia, and other problems. Therapeutic colonoscopy has radically changed the management of colonic polyps, and colonoscopic polypectomy is now the standard form of treatment for most of these lesions. Treatment of bleeding lesions, decompression of obstruction, and removal of foreign bodies are other examples of therapeutic colonoscopic procedures.

Colonic Diseases↗