From the Editor's desk European conscience.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The World Health Organization's (WHO) Global Programme for Vaccines and Immunization has three linked aims. The first is to give the so-called Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) vaccines to as many of the 125 million children who are born into the world each year as possible. The second is to ensure for the world an adequate supply of vaccines, and to safeguard vaccine quality. The third is in the field of vaccine research and development, not only coordinating the worldwide effort for new and improved vaccines but also preparing the way for their introduction into the EPI and continually to seek ways to simplify vaccination schedules. Enormous effort has gone into the polio eradication campaign. Following brilliant progress in both India and Africa, the goal of eradication by the year 2000 or shortly thereafter now seems achievable. Although a decision has not yet been taken, an attempt at measles eradication may well be the next huge challenge. The Global Programme for Vaccines and Immunization (GPV) is closely tied up with the Children's Vaccine Initiative (CVI) which is the name given to an umbrella organization which seeks to unite all the forces in the world promoting widespread use of vaccines. The chief functions of CVI are to be a strategic think tank, particularly as regards priorities; and to be a strong, consistent and effective advocacy group. Previously there had been some misunderstanding of the respective roles of WHO and CVI. These have now been cleared up by a dual stratagem--one single person, Dr JW Lee, as the administrative head of both Programmes; and one single Scientific Advisory Group of Experts or SAGE to guide the scientific aspects of both Programmes. The author has the honour of being Chairman of SAGE. It is apparent, however, that resource constraints are looming large in the affairs of both GPV and CVI. Clearly, the newer vaccines will be more expensive than the traditional ones, and the world must grope for new mechanisms to bring the fruits of the current upsurge of interest in vaccine development to all the countries of the world, not just the affluent ones.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Science-based performance standards offer a viable means of reducing regulatory burden while ensuring that research animal welfare and high-quality research data are realized. Unlike rigid regulations, science-based performance standards evolve as new information becomes available, thereby allowing new discoveries to be implemented in a timely manner and in a way that more effectively benefits the animals and the science. The implementation of performance standards requires a well-coordinated institutional team composed of the administration, research staff, the institutional animal care and use committee, professional and technical animal care personnel, occupational health and safety staff, and physical plant staff. This animal program team is best supported in an institutional environment that reflects a culture of care, compliance, and responsibility. In such a culture, the professional judgment exercised by the team is well grounded in meeting the diverse needs of the program's customers, who include the animals, the researchers, and research stakeholders such as the public. The institutional culture of care, compliance, and responsibility fosters workplace integrity, an ethics-based decision-making paradigm, sound understanding of institutional expectations through good communication and clear lines of authority, the hiring and retention of trained and well-qualified individuals, and a system for continuous development and improvement of the program.