PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Decision Making”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

The impact of genetic screening on surgical decision-making in breast cancer.

For centuries, clinicians have recognized that a segment of their patient population is at increased risk to develop breast cancer based on their family history of the disease. Due to the absence of molecular information, it was not uncommon for women and their surgeons to make decisions regarding management of prophylactic surgery based solely on their family history, without specific information about the patient's personal risk to develop the disease. It has been only within the past 7 years that linkage for the breast cancer (BRCA) susceptibility genes has been established, and within the past 3 years that the genes have been cloned. Although clinical testing for the BRCA genes has been available for less than 2 years, it is already apparent that the implications for surgeons and their patients are significant.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology.

Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are computational methodologies that perform multifactorial analyses, inspired by networks of biological neurons. Like neural networks, ANNs contain layers of simple points (nodes) of data that interract through carefully weighted connection lines. ANNs are "trained" and balanced by having been previously fed data, which the ANN uses as the means for adjusting its interconnections. Studies have shown that novel and highly accurate ANNs significantly enhance the ability to detect prostate cancer early (high sensitivity) while avoiding a greater number of unnecessary tissue samplings (high specificity). The use of ANNs in prostate cancer is ideal because of 1) multiple predicting factors that influence outcome; 2) the desire to offer individual consulting based on various tests; 3) the fact that prior logistic regression analysis results have had serious limitations in application; and 4) the need for an up-to-date tool that can apply easily to everyone. An ANN should be seen as an important tool that is complementary to the physician's personal knowledge and judgment in making decisions.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1993

Decision making in social work: a review.

Decision making is a core practice activity for all social workers. They make decisions about career and professional relationships, about clients and interventions and they must react to the decisions of others. This article provides an overview of decision making theory and research, beginning with the wider realm of decision making literature taken from other disciplines and moving on to specific applications within the field of social work. Areas for continued research on decision making in social work are noted.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2004

Influence of bodily harm on neural correlates of semantic and moral decision-making.

Moral decision-making is central to everyday social life because the evaluation of the actions of another agent or our own actions made with respect to the norms and values guides our behavior in a community. There is previous evidence that the presence of bodily harm--even if irrelevant for a decision--may affect the decision-making process. While recent neuroimaging studies found a common neural substrate of moral decision-making, the role of bodily harm has not been systematically studied so far. Here we used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate how behavioral and neural correlates of semantic and moral decision-making processes are modulated by the presence of direct bodily harm or violence in the stimuli. Twelve participants made moral and semantic decisions about sentences describing actions of agents that either contained bodily harm or not and that could easily be judged as being good or bad or correct/incorrect, respectively. During moral and semantic decision-making, the presence of bodily harm resulted in faster response times (RT) and weaker activity in the temporal poles relative to trials devoid of bodily harm/violence, indicating a processing advantage and reduced processing depth for violence-related linguistic stimuli. Notably, there was no increase in activity in the amygdala and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) in response to trials containing bodily harm. These findings might be a correlate of limited generation of the semantic and emotional context in the anterior temporal poles during the evaluation of actions of another agent related to violence that is made with respect to the norms and values guiding our behavior in a community.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Clinical decision making--an art or a science? Part V: Patient preferences and their influence on decision making.

Part IV of this series introduced the idea that the value a patient places on an outcome has an important influence on the decision making process. This article considers this concept further. It argues that dentists should assess a patient's preferences and consider these before deciding on a treatment option. The article explains that by enumerating all the treatment options and possible outcomes, it is possible to assess the value placed on each result. Similarly an assessment is crucial if the dentist aims to achieve the optimum treatment result--one which is regarded as the most favourable outcome by the patient.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed2005

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex affects strategic decision-making.

Although decision-making is typically seen as a rational process, emotions play a role in tasks that include unfairness. Recently, activation in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during offers experienced as unfair in the Ultimatum Game was suggested to subserve goal maintenance in this task. This is restricted to correlational evidence, however, and it remains unclear whether the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is crucial for strategic decision-making. The present study used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in order to investigate the causal role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in strategic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. The results showed that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex resulted in an altered decision-making strategy compared with sham stimulation. We conclude that the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is causally implicated in strategic decision-making in healthy human study participants.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Superior temporal gyrus and insula provide response and outcome-dependent information during assessment and action selection in a decision-making situation.

Decision-making is a complex process that comprises the assessment of a situation, the selection of an action, and the evaluation of an outcome. Distinct neural systems may contribute differentially during various stages within a decision-making situation. This study investigated whether neural activation during assessment or action selection is critically dependent on previous outcomes or actions. Twelve healthy, right-handed subjects (6 females) played a Rock Paper Scissors (RPS) computer game during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Bilateral insula and medial prefrontal cortex (including the anterior cingulate) were specifically engaged during the assessment and action selection stages of decision-making, whereas bilateral superior frontal gyrus and right inferior parietal lobule activated more during the outcome. Two regions of activation within the bilateral superior temporal gyrus activated only when the previous outcome was a win. Moreover, right insula and superior temporal gyrus were active more when the subject switched responses relative to staying with the same choice made on the previous trial. These findings support the hypothesis that distinct neural systems underlie different stages of the decision-making process. Furthermore, the superior temporal gyrus may play an important role in integrating previous actions and successful outcomes into one's decision-making strategy.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Economic aspects of clinical decision making: applications of clinical decision analysis.

Clinical decision analysis as a basic tool for decision making is described, and potential applications of decision analysis in six areas of clinical practice are identified. Clinical decision analysis is a systematic method of describing clinical problems in a quantitative fashion, identifying possible courses of action, assessing the probability and value of outcomes, and then making a calculation to select the ultimate course of action. Clinical decision analysis provides a structure for clinical decision problems, helps clarify medical controversies, and encourages decision makers to speak a common language. Applications of clinical decision analysis in the areas of diagnostic testing, patient management, product and program selection, research and education, patient preferences, and health-care-policy evaluation are described. Decision analysis offers health professionals a tool for making quantifiable, cost-effective clinical decisions, especially in terms of clinical outcomes.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1993

Decision analysis in formulary decision making.

Although decision making about what drugs to include in an institutional formulary appears to lend itself readily to quantitative techniques such as decision analysis and cost-benefit analysis, a review of the literature reveals that very little has been published in this area. Several of the published decision analyses use non-standard techniques that are, at best, of unproved validity, and may seriously distort the underlying issues through covert under-counting or double-counting of various drug attributes. Well executed decision analyses have contributed to establishing that drug acquisition costs are not an adequate measure of the total economic impact of formulary decisions and that costs of labour and materials associated with drug administration must be calculated on an institution-specific basis to reflect unique staffing patterns, bulk purchasing practices, and the availability of surplus capacity within the institution which might be mobilised at little marginal cost. Clinical studies of newly introduced drugs frequently fail to answer the questions that weigh most heavily on the structuring of a formal assessment of a proposed formulary acquisition. Studies comparing a full spectrum of therapeutically equivalent drugs are rarely done, and individual studies of particular pairs of drugs can rarely be used together because of differences in methodology or patient populations studied. Gathering of institution-specific economic and clinical data is a daunting, labour-intensive task. In many institutions, incentive and reward structures discourage behaviour that takes the broad institutional perspective that is intrinsic to a good decision analysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗
PubMed1996

Bioethics for clinicians: 5. Substitute decision-making.

Substitute decision-making is a means of making health care decisions on behalf of people who are incapable of making these decisions for themselves. It is based on the ethical principle of respect for autonomy. Substitute decision-making poses two main questions: Who-should make the decision for the incapable person, and, How should the decision be made? Because the applicable statutory and common law varies across Canada, clinicians should become familiar with the legal requirements of their own province or territory.

AIDS Dementia Complex↗
PubMed2006

Behavioral inhibition and prefrontal cortex in decision-making.

Every day we make innumerable decisions; some require no effort at all whereas others require considerable deliberation and weighing of various options. Despite the importance of decision-making in our lives and increased research interest, the specific neural mechanisms underlying decision-making remain unclear. We propose that the brain has at least two cortical pathways that independently generate a decision about appropriate behavior in given circumstances. These two pathways are extensions of the dorsal and ventral streams of the visual processing pathways. The parieto-premotor (extended dorsal) pathway makes decisions about motor actions in a largely autonomous and automatic fashion whereas the temporo-ventrolateral prefrontal (extended ventral) pathway is involved primarily in deliberate decisions and inhibitory control over behavior through the inhibitory function of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Animals↗
PubMedDate not supplied

RN and RPN decision making across settings.

Nursing decision making was a focus of the Province-Wide Nursing Project (PWNP), a 3-year project to promote best nursing practice. In much of the growing literature on nursing decision making, it is assumed that there are differences in the way RNs and RPNs make decisions. However, there is little scientific evidence to support this assumption. The RN and RPN decision making across settings questionnaire was completed by nurses employed in the 23 agencies of the 4 Participating Complexes taking part in the project. The survey questions were subjected to factor analysis and reduced to five factors. Results revealed measurable differences between the way that RNs and RPNs made decisions. Both RNs and RPNs reported making decisions frequently and experiencing little difficulty in making them. However, there were statistically significant differences in the frequency with which RNs and RPNs perceived they made decisions and the difficulty they found in making them. To plan effective health care, it is important to take account of the strengths of different health care workers. There is a need for further research to investigate the reasons behind the differences revealed in these findings.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Doctor-patient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making.

The traditional paternalistic model of medical decision-making, in which doctors make decisions on behalf of their patients, has increasingly come to be seen as outdated. Moreover, the role of the patient in the consultation has been emphasised, notably through the adoption of 'patient-centred' strategies. Models that promote patients' active involvement in the decision-making process about treatment have been developed. We examine one particular model of shared decision making [Charles, C., Gafni, A., Whelan, T, 1997. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Science & Medicine 44, 681-692.]. The model has four main characteristics. These are that (1) both the patient and the doctor are involved, (2) both parties share information, (3) both parties take steps to build a consensus about the preferred treatment and (4) an agreement is reached on the treatment to implement. Focusing on the first two of the four characteristics of the model, we use the findings from a study of 62 consultations, together with interviews conducted with patients and general practitioners, to consider participation in the consultation in terms of sharing information about, and views of, medicines. We found little evidence that doctors and patients both participate in the consultation in this way. As a consequence there was no basis upon which to build a consensus about the preferred treatment and reach an agreement on which treatment to implement. Thus even the first two of the four conditions said to be necessary for shared decision making were not generally present in the consultations we studied. These findings were presented in feedback sessions with participating GPs, who identified a number of barriers to shared decision making, as well as expressing an interest in developing strategies to overcome these barriers.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2004

[Shared decision making (SDM) with chronic pain patients. The patient as a partner in the medical decision making process].

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is an exemplary condition of chronic widespread pain that is difficult to control and often leads to frustration and resignation on the part of both the patient and the doctor. Shared decision making (SDM) could be a means to facilitate doctor-patient interaction and might therefore influence therapeutic decisions taken. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the effects of SDM with FMS patients. We developed a communication train-ing program for physicians and a computer-based information tool on FMS for patients. The study included 133 FMS patients. Intervention group I (IG I) was treated by communication-trained doctors and had access to a computer-based information tool on FMS,intervention group II (IG II) was treated by standard doctors and received the information tool, and the control group (CG) was treated by standard doctors and got no additional information. All three groups we-re offered the same evidence-based treatment options for FMS. Patients of the IGs were more willing to become involved in exercise, to enroll in integrated group therapy for FMS patients (IGTF), and to take analgesics. Patients of the CG preferred anti-depressants. More patients from IG II and CG opted for relaxation techniques. Patients in IG I and IG II choose significantly more therapeutic options than patients in the CG. SDM is one means to increase FMS patients' readiness for treatment. Especially the element of providing sufficient medical information seems to account for this effect. The readiness to enroll in physical activities, to take analgesics, and to participate in psychotherapeutic elements was most likely to be raised through SDM.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.

While there is an increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and shared decision making, evidence suggests that many patients do not wish to be involved in decisions about their own care. Previous research has found patient preferences for involvement in decision making to vary with age, socioeconomic status, illness experience, and the gravity of the decision. Furthermore, there is evidence that certain patients may experience disutility from being involved in decision making about the treatment of their health problems. We discuss the implications of these findings for the use of decision support tools and the difficulties of targeting their use towards those patients most likely to benefit. We argue that patients may be ill informed about what participation in decision making actually entails and unaware of the benefits they stand to gain by articulating their preferences to their clinician. Furthermore, clinicians are not good at accurately assessing patients' preferences, while patients may have unrealistic expectations about their clinician's ability to "know what is best" for them. Further research is required to understand variations in patients' preferences for information and involvement in decision making, and the factors that influence them.

Communication↗
PubMed2005

The dark side of emotion in decision-making: when individuals with decreased emotional reactions make more advantageous decisions.

Can dysfunction in neural systems subserving emotion lead, under certain circumstances, to more advantageous decisions? To answer this question, we investigated how individuals with substance dependence (ISD), patients with stable focal lesions in brain regions related to emotion (lesion patients), and normal participants (normal controls) made 20 rounds of investment decisions. Like lesion patients, ISD made more advantageous decisions and ultimately earned more money from their investments than the normal controls. When normal controls either won or lost money on an investment round, they adopted a conservative strategy and became more reluctant to invest on the subsequent round, suggesting that they were more affected than lesion patients and ISD by the outcomes of decisions made in the previous rounds.

Alcoholism↗
PubMed1979

Decision making.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Decision Making↗