PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Medical Waste Disposal”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

Nurses' infection-control practice: hand decontamination, the use of gloves and sharp instruments.

Infection is an acknowledged hospital problem. Micro-organisms are disseminated mainly via hands but there is evidence that hand decontamination, the most important means of prevention, is performed too seldom, and not always after activities likely to result in heavy contamination. Nurses themselves are exposed to risks of infection, chiefly through contact with blood and body fluids, yet it has also been reported that gloves are not always worn during contact with patients' secretions and that the handling and disposal of sharp instruments may be performed unsafely. The study reported in this paper documents nursing behaviour in relation to hand decontamination, the use of gloves and sharps, taking into consideration a number of variables which could influence practice: availability of the expertise afforded by an infection-control nurse, clinical setting, nursing workload, knowledge and the resources available to control infection. Hands were decontaminated after 28.78% of patient contacts. Hands were decontaminated after 49.85% of activities likely to result in heavy contamination. Performance was related to nursing workload and the availability of hand decontaminating agents, especially when the nurses became busy. Use of gloves when they were available also proved good, with little evidence of wasteful use. The handling and disposal of sharps were commendable for most subjects but a few grossly unsafe incidents were nevertheless witnessed, apparently not associated with any of the variables examined.

Analysis of Variance↗

An investigation of the disposal of hazardous wastes from New Zealand dental practices.

A national survey was conducted to investigate current procedures in New Zealand dental practices for disposal of clinical waste. A questionnaire was sent out to all dental practices in New Zealand, and non-returns were followed up by two further mailings. From three mailings 767 useable questionnaires were returned (71.3% of those sent out, 79.0% of those potentially valid). Responses indicated that 56.4% of dental practices disposed of bloody swabs into the waste paper bin, and 24.4% disposed of contaminated sharp items into the general household refuse collection. Qualitative interviews with dental practitioners revealed a lack of concern about disposal of contaminated waste into the general waste. The existence of legislation governing waste disposal was not sufficient to motivate many practitioners to comply with guidelines. In some areas there was no specialised waste disposal service available, but some dentists had rejected a specialised service on the grounds of cost or inconvenience. Substantial efforts were made to salvage amalgam waste to be sold for scrap.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Amalgam waste management.

Dental amalgam has been extensively used as a tooth filling material for many decades and has beyond doubt saved millions of teeth that otherwise would have needed to be extracted. The release of amalgam particles into dental office wastewater is a matter of particular concern as amalgam particles could then be discharged into the environment. Amalgam waste discharges contribute to mercury in the environment through direct wastewater discharge, incineration, land-filling and sewage sludge incineration, although the discharge from dentistry is probably responsible for less than 1% of the total mercury discharged annually into the environment as a result of human activities. Nevertheless, dentists, by being producers of amalgam waste, have a responsibility and a duty of care for the proper management of this waste within their practices. Appropriate measures should be taken to minimise the amount of waste where possible or take action to ensure that all generated waste is disposed of in accordance with environmental legislation.

American Dental Association↗

[Dental waste management in municipal health clinics in Belo Horizonte, Brazil].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether municipal health clinics in the city of Belo Horizonte, Brazil, comply with the legal requirements for managing dental wastes. METHOD: We collected information from 54 of the city's 105 municipal health clinics that provide dental care. At each clinic we interviewed the clinic manager, one dental assistant, and one general assistant. Based on the requirements outlined in the Belo Horizonte Health Waste Management Manual, we assessed characteristics in the following three areas: (1) technical and operational (waste classification and characterization, minimization, segregation, pretreatment, conditioning, collection and internal and external transportation, and external storage); (2) general and organizational (inspection, amount of clinic space, environmental permits, floor plan showing waste-generating areas, and whether the clinic had a technical specialist responsible for managing the health wastes); and (3) human resources (employee vaccination records and oversight, occupational safety and occupational medicine program, environmental risk prevention program, medical oversight and occupational health program, hospital (clinic) infection control committee, and training in health waste management). RESULTS: The clinics produced an average of 270 liters of solid waste per day. None of the clinics surveyed had a plan for managing health wastes. The only requirements with which all the clinics complied were: segregation of needles and mercury, adequately identified cardboard containers used for disposal of cutting and piercing items, and daily internal collection and transportation of wastes. CONCLUSIONS: When the risks associated with each class of waste have not been established, all the wastes should be considered potentially dangerous. Further, a law by itself does not guarantee that the public's health will be protected. Before public agencies impose legal requirements, it is necessary to know if the agencies themselves are capable of enforcing those requirements. Any proposed waste management legislation should be based on scientific research.

Brazil↗

Going green.

While citizens are being encouraged to become 'green' and recycle household and garden waste, the NHS is lagging far behind. Clinical waste has to be disposed of in a safe way, much 'domestic' waste could be recycled and save trusts money--as some hospitals in the United States have found.

Conservation of Natural Resources↗

Assessment of injection-related practices in a tribal community of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India.

A survey to assess injection related practices carried out among the Nicobarese, a mongoloid tribe of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. The survey was carried out using the rapid assessment and response guide of Safe Injection Global Network of the World Health Organization and included review of randomly selected prescriptions of patients attending outpatient clinic of district hospital, interview and observation of injection providers in the district hospital and sub-centres and interview of the general population. The findings of the survey showed that 18.8% of prescriptions included at least one injection. The per capita injection rate was 3 per year. Majority of injections were administered with disposable syringe and needle and in hospital setting. All the injection providers were aware about possibility of HIV transmission through unsafe injections. However, the awareness among the general population was low. More than half of the individuals had preference to injections. It is suggested that remedial measures, such as education of prescribers to reduce the number of injections to a bare minimum, maintaining regular supply of disposable injection equipment, provision of adequate sharps containers with safe disposal facilities and community education be undertaken to avoid future spread of blood-borne pathogens.

Blood-Borne Pathogens↗

Correlates of unsafe syringe acquisition and disposal among injection drug users in Baltimore, Maryland.

Because multi-person syringe use is the most common vehicle for HIV and hepatitis C virus transmission among injection drug users (IDUs), safe sources of sterile syringes and safe methods of disposal are necessary to curb these epidemics. We examined syringe acquisition and disposal in a cohort of IDUs in Baltimore. Between January 1, 1998 and December 31, 2001, 1034 participants reported on syringe acquisition at 3492 visits, and 953 reported on disposal at 2569 visits. Participants were 69.9% male, 93.9% African-American, and median age was 44. Syringes were acquired exclusively from unsafe sources at 32.3% of visits, while exclusively unsafe disposal was reported at 59.3% of visits. Significant correlates of unsafe acquisition were: attending shooting galleries, anonymous sex, sharing needles, smoking crack, and emergency room visits. Significant correlates of unsafe disposal were: injecting speedball, no methadone treatment, acquiring safely, and frequent injection. Having a primary source of medical care was associated with safe acquisition, but unsafe disposal. IDUs continue to acquire safely but dispose unsafely, especially among those with a primary source of care; this suggests that messages about safe disposal are not being disseminated as widely as those about acquisition. These data suggest the need for a more active program involving pharmacists, an expanded syringe access program, and better efforts to enhance safe disposal.

Adolescent↗

Situation analysis of TB microscopy centres in Ghana.

SETTING: Public health laboratories in Ghana performing tuberculosis (TB) microscopy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the situation of the laboratories in terms of staff strength, technical skills, documentation, biosafety practices, equipment, supplies and disposal systems. DESIGN: Methods used for data collection were interviews using a structured questionnaire, informal observation of laboratory registers, disposal systems and safety measures for sputum handling. RESULTS: Of 114 laboratories visited between 2000 and 2001, 102 (89.5%) were performing TB microscopy. Of the staff working in the laboratories, 9% were medical technologists, 24% laboratory technicians, 37% laboratory assistants and 30% orderlies. Average false-negative and -positive rates were respectively 13% and 14%. Although most of the centres (85.3%) were using the recommended TB laboratory register for recording, in most cases they were not filled in accurately or completely. The majority of the available microscopes had mechanical or optical faults. Availability of other materials for smear preparation and staining ranged from 44% to 82%. The main methods employed for disposal of laboratory waste were burning and burying, but conditions were poor in most of the facilities visited. CONCLUSION: Training of laboratory personnel in TB microscopy and establishment of a quality assurance system are needed in Ghana.

Bacteriological Techniques↗

Disposal of syringes, needles, and lancets used by diabetic patients in North East Essex.

To investigate community disposal of contaminated sharps by insulin-treated diabetes mellitus patients, we surveyed 144 patients. Twenty-three (16.0%) were non-contactable, leaving a study sample of 121, of whom 102 (84.3%) responded. Among the respondents 93.1% used lancets and 97.1% needles; 70.6% used lancets once or twice a day and 65.7% used needles twice a day. The majority said they had received no information on safe disposal of sharps. Of those recalling advice, most received it from diabetes nurse specialists. The majority of needle users used needle clippers and/or sharps bins for disposal. Most of the lancet users resorted to drinks cans/bottles or domestic waste. There were statistically significant differences in practices between patients receiving and not receiving advice on sharps disposal (odds ratio [OR] 6.36 [95% CI 2.04-23.28] p = 0.0007 for needle disposal and OR 15.41 [95% CI 3.57-90.12] p = 0.00001 for lancet disposal). There were also statistically significant differences among needle users using and not using needle clippers and/or sharps bins according to the interval since diagnosis and the frequency of needle use per day. This study identifies a need for a standardised approach to sharps disposal supported by an effective method of disseminating information, and a need for advice on auditing its impact.

Adolescent↗

Comparison of infectious waste management in European hospitals.

A research project sponsored by the EC-LIFE programme was conducted to compare waste management in five different European hospitals. A comparison of the regulations governing current waste management revealed different strategies for defining infectious hospital waste. The differences in the infrastructure were examined and the consequences for waste segregation and disposal were discussed under economic and ecological aspects. In this context the definition of infectious waste is very important.

Cross Infection↗

Fentanyl remaining in a transdermal system following three days of continuous use.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there was a sufficient amount of fentanyl remaining in a patch that had been used continuously for 3 days to warrant establishment of disposal policies to prevent diversion of fentanyl. DESIGN: Nine patches were applied and removed by hospice nurses after 3 days of continuous use on hospice patients with cancer. Patches were analyzed for the remaining fentanyl contents using the Coat-A-Count Fentanyl radioimmunoassay. Five 2.5-mg patches and four 10.0-mg patches were opened, solubilized with methanol, diluted with water, and analyzed in duplicate. An unused 2.5-mg patch also was analyzed as a control and showed a 94% recovery of fentanyl. A methanol blank was negative for fentanyl. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The study determined the amount of fentanyl in milligrams remaining in a used patch. Using pharmacokinetics principles, this quantity was compared with a potential lethal dose of fentanyl. RESULTS: Analysis showed 0.7-1.22 mg remaining in the 2.5-mg patches and 4.46-8.44 mg remaining in the 10.0-mg patches. These numbers represent 28-84.4% of the original contents. Using the pharmacokinetic values of the volume of distribution of 4L/kg and a potential lethal blood concentration of 3.7 micrograms/L, one can calculate the potential lethal dose for a 70-kg person to be 1036 micrograms. This is well within the amount remaining in the patch. This study also demonstrated that a wide patient variability exists in the absorption of fentanyl from the patch. CONCLUSIONS: There is a sufficient amount of fentanyl available for abuse and misuse after 3 days of therapeutic use. Adequate disposal policies currently are not established and need to be implemented.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

Biomedical solid waste management in an Indian hospital: a case study.

The objectives of this study were: (i) to assess the waste handling and treatment system of hospital bio-medical solid waste and its mandatory compliance with Regulatory Notifications for Bio-medical Waste (Management and Handling) Rules, 1998, under the Environment (Protection Act 1986), Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Govt. of India, at the chosen KLE Society's J. N. Hospital and Medical Research Center, Belgaum, India and (ii) to quantitatively estimate the amount of non-infectious and infectious waste generated in different wards/sections. During the study, it was observed that: (i) the personnel working under the occupier (who has control over the institution to take all steps to ensure biomedical waste is handled without any adverse effects to human health and the environment) were trained to take adequate precautionary measures in handling these bio-hazardous waste materials, (ii) the process of segregation, collection, transport, storage and final disposal of infectious waste was done in compliance with the Standard Procedures, (iii) the final disposal was by incineration in accordance to EPA Rules 1998, (iv) the non-infectious waste was collected separately in different containers and treated as general waste, and (v) on an average about 520 kg of non-infectious and 101 kg of infectious waste is generated per day (about 2.31 kg per day per bed, gross weight comprising both infectious and non-infectious waste). This hospital also extends its facility to the neighboring clinics and hospitals by treating their produced waste for incineration.

Guideline Adherence↗

Are Irish General Practitioners minimising infection risk from sharps?

A self administered postal questionnaire was sent to a computer randomised sample of 200 GPs registered with the Irish College of General Practitioners. The objective of this was to determine if Irish GPs are minimising infection risk from sharps, by observing current phlebotomy techniques, current sharps disposal methods and by availing of Hepatitis B vaccination. The response rate was 69% (n = 138). Phlebotomy technique: syringes and needles were used by 55% and the vacutainer system by 34% with 11% using both methods. Of note, 50% of G.P.s usually recapped needles and 57% never wore gloves. Only 48% of G.P.s had been vaccinated against Hepatitis B. More recently qualified G.P.s were more likely to be vaccinated. Many Irish G.P.s have unsafe phlebotomy practices. There is inadequate use of specifically designed impenetrable sharps boxes, with no standard method of either collection or disposal of used sharps. Uptake of Hepatitis B vaccination is low. Amongst Irish G.P.s, there is a gap between the perceived and the actual safety of sharps disposal methods in use. No protocol advising G.P.s on infection control exists. We recommend that guidelines regarding safe phlebotomy technique, sharps disposal and the importance of Hepatitis B vaccination be produced and strongly reinforced, and that within each health board there is a standard policy and procedure established for collection and disposal of used sharps. The above are essential for the health and safety for both G.P.s and the public.

Family Practice↗

The use of absorbent materials for the disposal of controlled drugs.

The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland's most recent publication on controlled drugs notes that the Environmental Protection Act (1992) does not permit the disposal of controlled drugs into the water sewerage system. The Association suggests that, in order to conform to the Misuse of Drugs Regulations (1985), controlled drugs may best be disposed of using some sort of absorbent material, for example a small amount of cat litter or wallpaper paste, in the bottom of a sharps bin. The absorbent capacity of three types of cat litter, wallpaper paste and a commercial absorbent material were tested. Both the commercial absorbent and wallpaper paste displayed limited absorbent qualities unless the container was agitated. The cat litter, Snowflake, absorbed more controlled drug than the others (one-way ANOVA, F2,12 = 250.85, p < 0.01). The use of absorbent materials in sharps bins for the disposal of controlled drugs in clinical areas has limitations and may not be suitable. It is concluded, therefore, that small volumes of controlled drugs should be disposed of directly into clinical waste and that large volumes should be dealt with using a commercial absorbent in its own container.

Absorption↗

Injection practices and sharp waste disposal by general practitioners of Murree, Pakistan.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the injection and sharp waste disposal practices of general practitioners of Murree, Pakistan. METHODOLOGY: In-depth interviews of all general practitioners available between 10th to 20th July 2000 were conducted. Practitioners were interviewed about injection administration and disposal of waste due to injections and other sharp material. RESULTS: Twenty general practitioners out of 25 were interviewed. All claimed using disposable syringes only once. None of them was disposing off syringes in sharp containers in the clinic. Of 20, 12 (60%) were throwing syringes at open places and 5 (25%) in municipal waste bins. Most of the injections by general practitioners were administered for fever, body aches, diarrhea and respiratory tract infection. CONCLUSION: Sharp waste disposal is not safe in Murree. Improper disposal of sharp waste needs development of cost effective methods that are applicable at a small scale. Larger studies are required to quantify the gravity of the problem.

Adult↗