SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Meropenem”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

PubMed2006

Prospective drug utilization evaluation of three broad-spectrum antimicrobials: cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem are among the broadest-spectrum and most expensive antimicrobials. AIM: To evaluate guidelines for appropriate use of these drugs. METHODS: We developed guidelines for use of these antibiotics, and conducted a two-phase drug utilization evaluation. We included all patients who received one of the study drugs during two 3-month periods, with an educational intervention in the intervening period. Appropriateness was determined for initiation of treatment, and for adaptation or continuation of established treatment. RESULTS: Overall, 205 patients received 271 courses with one of these antibiotics, for a total of 709 defined daily doses (DDD) of cefepime, 543 of piperacillin-tazobactam, and 680 of meropenem (8.3, 6.3 and 7.9 DDD/1000 admission days, respectively). Of these 271 courses, 234 were appropriate (86%). Treatment was continued for > or =5 days in 60%, of which 88% were appropriate (NS). Of the 271 courses, 210 (77%) were empirical (83% appropriate), while 61 (23%) were based on a relevant culture result (97% appropriate) (p < 0.001). Appropriateness differed significantly between departments (p < 0.001), and between the two phases (p < 0.001). The major difference between the two surveys was a decrease in meropenem usage (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: The vast majority of courses with cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem are empirically selected and continued, underlying the importance of an optimal initial choice. Antibiotic guidelines, in conjunction with formal infectious disease consultation, can contribute to more appropriate use of these drugs.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2003

Prophylaxis with meropenem of septic complications in acute pancreatitis: a randomized, controlled trial versus imipenem.

OBJECTIVES: Prophylactic antibiotics are helpful in decreasing the incidence of septic complications in acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of meropenem, a new carbapenem antibiotic, with that of imipenem, which is the standard prophylactic treatment in patients with severe acute pancreatitis. METHODS: One hundred seventy-six patients with necrotizing pancreatitis were prospectively randomized to prophylactic treatment with 0.5 g meropenem t.i.d. intravenously or 0.5 g imipenem q.i.d. intravenously. The occurrence of infection of pancreatic necrosis, rate of extrapancreatic infections, systemic and local complications, need for surgery, mortality rate, and length of hospitalization were recorded for each group. When a septic complication of pancreatic necrosis was suspected, fine needle aspiration with cultures of the sample was performed. Surgery was performed in cases of verified infected necrosis. CONCLUSION: No difference was observed between patients treated with meropenem and those treated with imipenem in terms of incidence of pancreatic infection (11.4% versus 13.6%) and extrapancreatic infections (21.6% versus 23.9%) and clinical outcome. Meropenem is as effective as imipenem in preventing septic complications of patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in preterm neonates.

The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the pharmacokinetics of meropenem in premature neonates, both after the first dose and during steady state at day 5, after a 1-minute intravenous administration to evaluate the possibility of twice-daily administration. Seven premature neonates received 15 mg/kg meropenem twice daily on clinical grounds as a 1-minute infusion. After the first dose and during steady state at day 5, serum levels of meropenem were measured for 12 hours after intravenous administration. Meropenem pharmacokinetics at the first dose were studied in seven children (mean birth weight 925 g, mean postnatal age 21 days). Serum concentration-time curves could be described with a one-compartment model. Mean total body clearance was 0.157 L/kg per hour, volume of distribution was 0.74 L/kg, and half-life was 3.4 hours. At day 5 at steady state, pharmacokinetic properties did not differ significantly. No side effects were noted. A 1-minute intravenous administration is feasible. Pharmacokinetic properties are comparable at day 5 compared with the first dose, and half-life is such that twice-daily administration of 15 mg/kg produces adequate serum concentrations.

Humans↗

PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetics and total elimination of meropenem and vancomycin in intensive care unit patients undergoing extended daily dialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Extended daily dialysis (EDD) combines the advantage of both intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy: excellent detoxification accompanied by cardiovascular tolerability. The aim of this study was to evaluate pharmacokinetics of meropenem and vancomycin in critically ill patients with renal failure undergoing EDD. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit in a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: We studied intensive care patients with anuric acute renal failure being treated with EDD and receiving meropenem (n = 10) or vancomycin (n = 10) therapy. INTERVENTIONS: The antibiotics were administered 6 hrs (1.0 g meropenem) or 12 hrs (1.0 g vancomycin) before EDD was started in order to study the pharmacokinetics before and during EDD. In addition to the application of different methods to calculate pharmacokinetic parameters, the total dialysate concentration of both drugs was measured. RESULTS: Based on the amount of the drug recovered from the collected spent dialysate, the fraction of drug removed by one dialysis treatment was 18% for meropenem and 26% for vancomycin. Dosing regimes for intermittent hemodialysis and continuous renal replacement therapy cannot be used for critically ill patients treated with EDD. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that patients treated with EDD by means of a high-flux dialyzer (polysulphone; surface area, 1.3 m; blood and dialysate flow, 160 mL/min; EDD time, 480 mins) and current dosing regimens run the risk of being significantly underdosed, which may have detrimental effects on critically ill patients with life-threatening infections. The exact dose has to be tailored according to weight and severity of illness as well as the current minimal inhibitory concentration against the incriminated bacteria. Whenever possible, therapeutic drug monitoring should be performed.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMed2026

Empirical Meropenem Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Critically Ill Adults With Sepsis: Feasibility of a Randomised Trial.

BACKGROUND: Meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam are commonly used empirical antibiotics in critically ill adults with sepsis, but whether one is superior to the other is uncertain. METHODS: The Empirical Meropenem versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam for Adult Patients with Sepsis (EMPRESS) trial is an ongoing investigator-initiated, randomised, open-label, adaptive clinical trial with an integrated feasibility phase comparing empirical treatment with meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill adults with sepsis. The integrated feasibility phase enrolled 200 participants across 10 intensive care units (ICUs) in Denmark between 28 June and 12 December 2025. Five pre-specified feasibility criteria were evaluated; if all feasibility criteria were met, the trial would proceed unaltered, whereas failure to meet one or more criteria would require intervention and re-evaluation. RESULTS: We randomised 200 of 284 screened patients (70.4%). The median age was 70 years (interquartile range (IQR): 60-77), 65.5% were males. At randomisation, 80.0% received vasopressors or inotropes, and 43.5% were on invasive mechanical ventilation. Four of five pre-specified feasibility criteria were met: time to completion of the feasibility phase (5.5 months vs. threshold < 12.0 months), recruitment proportion (70.4% vs. threshold ≥ 50.0%), proportion of participants without consent to the continued collection of data (2.5% vs. threshold < 5.0%) and protocol adherence (81.0% vs. threshold ≥ 75.0%). The proportion of participants with timely primary outcome data availability (30-day mortality) within 45 days was 85.5% and below the pre-specified threshold of ≥ 95.0%. The proportions were low in the first 3 months (33.3%, 22.2% and 30.8%, respectively), increasing to 95.8% in the last month of the feasibility phase. All-cause mortality at 30 days was 30.5%, and specific serious adverse reactions occurred in 4.0% of participants. CONCLUSIONS: In this integrated feasibility evaluation of the EMPRESS trial comparing empirical meropenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in critically ill adults with sepsis, four of five pre-specified feasibility criteria were met. The unmet criterion, timely primary outcome data availability, improved substantially during the feasibility phase. We consider the trial feasible and will proceed without modifications. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This feasibility study assessed recruitment, randomised allocation and data collection for the multicentre EMPRESS trial. For adaptive trials on trial platforms, careful interim checking of trial design functions is an important and necessary process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Information System EUCT number: 2023-509703-33-00; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06184659; Universal Trial Number: U1111-1301-6379.

Humans↗

PubMed1995

Determination of meropenem in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography and a microbiological method.

A rapid and selective high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method for the quantitative determination of meropenem in plasma is described. The drug was separated from plasma after plasma protein precipitation with 15% of trichloroacetic acid. The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile-water-glacial acetic acid (21.2, 78 and 0.8% v/v, respectively) delivered at a flow rate of 1.2 ml/min. Meropenem was quantified using ultraviolet detection at 296 nm. Meropenem and the internal standard (pheniramine) were well separated from plasma components. The drug could be assayed by the HPLC method in the presence of its analogue, imipenem. The detection limit in plasma was 25 ng/ml of meropenem. The results were compared with those of agar for a microbiological diffusion method using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 as the test organism. The sensitivity of the microbiological assay was less than 5 ng/ml, but this decreased at higher concentrations. Both methods were applied to the determination of the drug in aqueous solutions and in plasma.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2005

Meropenem susceptibility breakpoint for Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains hyperproducing mexB mRNA.

Twenty-five isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with different meropenem susceptibilities were subjected to quantitative RT-PCR for analysis of transcription levels of oprD, mexB and mexD, and, in selected isolates, PA3720, which is hyper-expressed in nalC efflux mutants. Regulator genes of efflux pump MexAB-OprM, mexR and PA3721 (putative) were sequenced in selected isolates. The potential for mathematical reconstruction of the ideal susceptible population using normalised resistance interpretation (NRI) was also studied. In three isolates with intermediate susceptibility to meropenem (according to Swedish breakpoints), a reduction in MIC from 4 to 2 mg/L was observed with efflux inhibitor MC-207,110. These isolates would be considered susceptible according to British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy and NCCLS breakpoints. These three isolates had between 4.6- and 5.0-fold increases in mexB transcription. None of these isolates had significant nalB mutations, but an Ala145-->Val mutation was observed in PA3721 in two of the isolates. However, these isolates had moderately increased production of PA3720 only. Single-strain regression analysis did not detect any major biological differences between the different groups. Using NRI, a disk-diffusion susceptibility breakpoint of >/= 28 mm was generated. Isolates with intermediate susceptibility to meropenem, which are considered fully susceptible in many countries, displayed possible low-grade meropenem resistance mechanisms, implying that the susceptibility breakpoint should be reconsidered. The increased transcription of mexB mRNA in such isolates seems unrelated to nalB or nalC mutations.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2006

Efficacies of caspofungin and a combination of caspofungin and meropenem in the treatment of murine disseminated candidiasis.

Disseminated candidiasis is relatively common in immunocompromised patients. The treatment protocol of these patients usually includes broad-spectrum antibiotics and also emprical antifungals initiated due to unresponsiveness to antibiotics. In this study the efficacies of caspofungin and meropenem - separately and together - in mice with disseminated candidiasis were studied. Immunocompetent mice were infected intravenously with 2x10(6) CFU of Candida albicans. At 24 h postinfection, intraperitoneal therapy was initiated and was continued for 7 days. Therapy groups included those given caspofungin (0.5, 1.25, 5 mg/kg/day), meropenem (20 mg/kg/day), and a combination of the two drugs. The outcome of therapy was evaluated by kidney tissue burden studies and histologic examination. In vitro, drug susceptibilities were tested by checkerboard analysis. Kidney CFU counts showed that mice that had received both drugs had lower residual burdens. Caspofungin was effective at doses of 0.5, 1.25, 5 mg/kg compared to infected untreated controls. In vitro, MICs of caspofungin and meropenem were <0.075 micro g/ml and >64 micro g/ml, respectively. Synergism was observed with the combination. Histopathology showed that the degree of inflammation was 25% less and tubular necrosis was more restricted in combined therapy than monotherapy. The results indicate that concurrent caspofungin and meropenem therapy may be beneficial.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Stability of meropenem and effect of 1 beta-methyl substitution on its stability in the presence of renal dehydropeptidase I.

The stability of meropenem in the presence of renal dehydropeptidase I (DHP-I) varied extremely with the animal source of the enzyme. Meropenem, compared with imipenem, was rather easily hydrolyzed by DHP-Is from mice, rabbits, and monkeys, while it showed a higher resistance to guinea pig and beagle dog DHP-Is. In addition, meropenem was four times more resistant than imipenem to human DHP-I. The 1 beta-methyl substituent on carbapenems, i.e., meropenem and 1 beta-methyl imipenem, made them considerably more resistant to mouse and swine DHP-Is than the 1-unsubstituted derivatives are.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Comparative in vitro killing activities of meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and ceftriaxone plus vancomycin at clinically achievable cerebrospinal fluid concentrations against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from children with meningitis.

The activities of meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin were evaluated against 80 penicillin-susceptible and -resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. Meropenem, imipenem, ceftriaxone, and vancomycin MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited were 0.5, 0.25, 1, and 0.25 microg/ml, respectively. Against penicillin-resistant strains, the best killing activity at cerebrospinal fluid concentrations was obtained with imipenem and ceftriaxone-vancomycin. However, while the killing activity of imipenem was significantly greater than that of meropenem, no significant difference was observed between the activities of meropenem and ceftriaxone-vancomycin.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2000

Efficacies of imipenem, meropenem, cefepime, and ceftazidime in rats with experimental pneumonia due to a carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase-producing strain of Enterobacter cloacae.

The antibacterial activities of imipenem-cilastatin, meropenem-cilastatin, cefepime and ceftazidime against Enterobacter cloacae NOR-1, which produces the carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase NmcA and a cephalosporinase, and against one of its in vitro-obtained ceftazidime-resistant mutant were compared by using an experimental model of pneumonia with immunocompetent rats. The MICs of the beta-lactams with an inoculum of 5 log(10) CFU/ml were as follows for E. cloacae NOR-1 and its ceftazidime-resistant mutant, respectively: imipenem, 16 and 128 microg/ml, meropenem, 4 and 32 microg/ml, cefepime, <0.03 and 1 microg/ml, and ceftazidime, 1 and 512 microg/ml. The chromosomally located cephalosporinase and carbapenem-hydrolyzing beta-lactamase NmcA were inducible by cefoxitin and meropenem in E. cloacae NOR-1, and both were stably overproduced in the ceftazidime-resistant mutant. Renal impairment was induced (uranyl nitrate, 1 mg/kg of body weight) in rats to simulate the human pharmacokinetic parameters for the beta-lactams studied. Animals were intratracheally inoculated with 8.5 log(10) CFU of E. cloacae, and therapy was initiated 3 h later. At that time, animal lungs showed bilateral pneumonia containing more than 6 log(10) CFU of E. cloacae per g of tissue. Despite the relative low MIC of meropenem for E. cloacae NOR-1, the carbapenem-treated rats had no decrease in bacterial counts in their lungs 60 h after therapy onset compared to the counts for the controls, regardless of whether E. cloacae NOR-1 or its ceftazidime-resistant mutant was inoculated. A significant decrease in bacterial titers was observed for the ceftazidime-treated rats infected with E. cloacae NOR-1 only. Cefepime was the only beta-lactam tested effective as treatment against infections due to E. cloacae NOR-1 or its ceftazidime-resistant mutant.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Plasmid-encoded metallo-beta-lactamase (IMP-6) conferring resistance to carbapenems, especially meropenem.

In 1996, Serratia marcescens KU3838 was isolated from the urine of a patient with a urinary tract infection at a hospital in northern Japan and was found to contain the plasmid pKU501. Previously, we determined that pKU501 carries bla(IMP) and the genes for TEM-1-type beta-lactamases as well as producing both types of beta-lactamases (H. Yano, A. Kuga, K. Irinoda, R. Okamoto, T. Kobayashi, and M. Inoue, J. Antibiot. 52:1135-1139, 1999). pKU502 is a recombinant plasmid that contains a 1.5-kb DNA fragment, including the metallo-beta-lactamase gene, and is obtained by PCR amplification of pKU501. The sequence of the metallo-beta-lactamase gene in pKU502 was determined and revealed that this metallo-beta-lactamase gene differed from the gene encoding IMP-1 by one point mutation, leading to one amino acid substitution: 640-A in the base sequence of the IMP-1 gene was replaced by G, and Ser-196 was replaced by Gly in the mature enzyme. This enzyme was designated IMP-6. The strains that produced IMP-6 were resistant to carbapenems. The MICs of panipenem and especially meropenem were higher than the MIC of imipenem for these strains. The k(cat)/K(m) value of IMP-6 was about sevenfold higher against meropenem than against imipenem, although the MIC of meropenem for KU1917, which produced IMP-1, was lower than that of imipenem, and the MIC of panipenem was equal to that of imipenem. These results support the hypothesis that IMP-6 has extended substrate profiles against carbapenems. However, the activity of IMP-6 was very low against penicillin G and piperacillin. These results suggest that IMP-6 acquired high activity against carbapenems, especially meropenem, via the point mutation but in the process lost activity against penicillins. Although IMP-6 has reduced activity against penicillins due to this point mutation, pKU501 confers resistance to a variety of antimicrobial agents because it also produces TEM-1-type enzyme.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2005

Evaluation by monte carlo simulation of the pharmacokinetics of two doses of meropenem administered intermittently or as a continuous infusion in healthy volunteers.

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibacterial agent. In order to optimize levels in plasma relative to the MICs, the ideal dose level and dosage regimen need to be determined. The pharmacokinetics of meropenem were studied in two groups, each comprising eight healthy volunteers who received the following doses: 500 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min three times a day (t.i.d.) versus a 250-mg loading dose followed by a 1,500 mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group A and 1,000 mg as an intravenous infusion over 30 min t.i.d. versus a 500-mg loading dose followed by a 3,000-mg continuous infusion over 24 h for group B. Meropenem concentrations in plasma and urine were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, respectively. Pharmacokinetic calculations were done by use of a two-compartment open model, and the data were extrapolated by Monte Carlo simulations for 10,000 simulated subjects for pharmacodynamic evaluation. There were no significant differences in total clearance and renal clearance between group A and group B or between the intermittent treatment and the continuous infusion. The analyses of the probability of target attainment by MIC for the high- and low-dose continuous infusions were robust up to MICs of 4 mg/liter and 2 mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding values for intermittent infusions were only 0.5 mg/liter and 0.25 mg/liter. When these observations were correlated with MICs obtained from the MYSTIC database, intermittent infusion results in adequate activity against two of the most common nosocomially acquired pathogens, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae. However, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the evaluation shows a clear advantage of high-dose therapy administered as a continuous infusion. We believe that in the empirical therapy situation, the continuous-infusion mode of administration is most worth the extra efforts. We conclude that clinical trials for evaluation of the continuous infusions of meropenem in critically ill patients are warranted.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

In vitro activities of meropenem and other antimicrobial agents against British meningococcal isolates.

The in vitro activity of meropenem was compared with those of penicillin, ampicillin, cefuroxime, cetriaxone, cefotaxime, rifampicin, chloramphenicol, sulphadiazine and ciprofloxacin against 121 British meningococcal isolates by a microdilution method in Mueller-Hinton broth and by the E test. All meningococcal strains were susceptible to the agents except for ampicillin (88.4%), penicillin (88.4%), sulphadiazine (57.9%) and rifampicin (95%). The emergence of resistance problems among meningococcal isolates stresses the need for their constant monitoring and of the development of new agents. In this study we have shown that meropenem is highly active in vitro against Neisseria meningitidis. Recent studies have indicated that meropenem is highly active clinically and bacteriologically in the treatment of bacterial meningitis. Thus, the potentials of meropenem as meningococcal prophylactic and therapeutic agent needs to be fully evaluated.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Effects of cefepime and meropenem on the gastrointestinal colonization of surgical patients by Candida albicans.

BACKGROUND: The study evaluated the effects of cefepime and meropenem on the gastrointestinal (GI) colonization of surgical patients by Candida albicans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty adult surgical patients who received intravenously either of these antibiotics as monotherapy for the treatment of an existing infection were studied prospectively. Ten patients received cefepime (2.0 g twice a day), and another ten meropenem (1.0 g every 8 h) for 7 days. Quantitative stool cultures for C. albicans were performed immediately before, at the end, and 1 week after the end of antibiotic treatment. RESULTS: Both antibiotics increased the GI colonization of patients by Candida. Meropenem caused a higher increase (2.0 log(10) CFU/g of stool) as compared to cefepime (1.7 log(10) CFU/g of stool). However, these increases were statistically not significant. CONCLUSION: Cefepime and meropenem when given to sensitive patients do not increase significantly the risk of Candida infection originating in the GI tract.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Postantibiotic effect of meropenem and ciprofloxacin in the presence of 5-fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: The postantibiotic effect (PAE) of meropenem and ciprofloxacin was studied in the presence of the antineoplastic agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the PAEs of the combinations differed from the PAEs of the antibiotics alone. METHODS: The PAEs of the combinations of 5-FU plus meropenem or ciprofloxacin were determined with viable counts against four reference strains of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and two clinical isolates of S. epidermidis. The results were compared with the PAEs of the antibiotics drugs and 5-FU alone. The gram-positive strains were tested for slime production, both alone and in the presence of 5-FU. RESULTS: Against two of the three tested strains of S. epidermidis, the combination of ciprofloxacin and 5-FU gave a synergistic prolongation of the PAE in comparison with the PAEs induced by the drugs alone. The combinations showed indifference against the other bacteria. The combination of meropenem and 5-FU had a synergistic PAE against one of the three tested strains of S. epidermidis and an additive effect against E. coli but showed indifference against the rest of the strains. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of 5-FU did not influence the PAEs of the antibiotics against most of the tested strains, but caused a synergistic prolongation of the PAEs induced by ciprofloxacin and meropenem against some of the tested strains of S. epidermidis. 5-FU inhibited slime production in the same S. epidermidis strains, which might have contributed to the longer PAE.

Anti-Infective Agents↗

PubMed2003

Correlation of meropenem plasma levels with pharmacodynamic requirements in critically ill patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration.

BACKGROUND: In patients with acute renal failure, the pharmacokinetics of meropenem depend on the operational characteristics of the renal replacement therapy. Dosage recommendations are based on the correlation of plasma levels with pharmacodynamic requirements. METHODS: Eight critically ill patients with acute renal failure were treated by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration with a filtrate flow of 1,600 ml/h and received 500 mg of meropenem every 12 h. Plasma and hemofiltrate concentrations of meropenem at steady state were determined by HPLC. RESULTS: Peak levels in plasma amounted to 39.5 +/- 10.5 mg/l (mean +/- SD) and trough levels were 2.4 +/- 1.5 mg/l. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for susceptible bacteria (4 mg/l) was covered for 40% of the dosing interval or longer in all patients. The MIC for intermediately susceptible organisms (8 mg/l) was covered for 33% in 6 of the 8 patients. The elimination half-life was prolonged to 3.63 +/- 0.77 h. The sieving coefficient of meropenem was 0.91 +/- 0.10 and the recovery in hemofiltrate amounted to 30.9 +/- 11.5% of the dose. CONCLUSIONS: A dosage of 500 mg twice daily provides appropriate serum levels for the treatment of infections caused by susceptible bacteria. A higher dosage is adequate for infections by intermediately susceptible bacteria or for renal replacement therapies with markedly higher filtrate flow rates.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMed2005

Derivation of meropenem dosage in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration based on pharmacodynamic target attainment.

BACKGROUND: Dosage recommendations for antibiotics in patients receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) should be based on pharmacodynamic requirements. For meropenem, this would be achieving appropriate time above the minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC). We employed Monte Carlo simulation to calculate the bactericidal target attainment for various dosing regimens of meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species. METHODS: Target attainment at 40% T > MIC was calculated for 5,000 simulated subjects receiving meropenem 1,000 mg every 12 and 8 h, and 500 mg every 12, 8 and 6 h. Pharmacokinetics were extrapolated from primary literature sources utilizing similar methods of CVVH. MIC data for P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species were derived from the US 2003 MYSTIC study. Target attainment at the breakpoint of 4 microg/ml was also calculated. RESULTS: Only regimens of 1,000 mg every 8 h and 500 mg every 6 h essentially achieve 100% target attainment at the breakpoint. However, due to higher peak concentrations, 1,000 mg every 8 h is able to attain improved target attainment against more resistant populations of P. aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species, thus providing the greatest probability of bactericidal exposure. CONCLUSION: Meropenem 1,000 mg every 8 h optimizes the pharmacodynamic profile in patients undergoing CVVH. Lower doses or increased dosing intervals should not be advocated for inpatients receiving this renal replacement technique. .

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug↗