SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Oxycodone”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

PubMed1981

Postoperative analgesics for superficial surgery. Comparison of four analgesics.

The efficacy of mild analgesics after 160 various superficial operations was studied by comparing intravenous lysine-acetylsalicylate (LAS) 1.8 g, Litalgin 4 ml (metamizole = dipyrone 2.0 g+ pitophenone 8.0 mg) or paracetamol 0.5 g to oxycodone 4 mg. At 15 min postdrug, oxycodone 4 mg had the best peak effect but this significant (P less than 0.05) difference to mild analgesics disappeared at 30 min, and thereafter all test analgesics showed an equally low effect. Two-thirds of the patients anaesthetized without peroperative analgesics needed pain relief when recovering from superficial surgery. The need for pain relief was lowest after varicose vein operations 40% of the patients as compared to about 70% after other types of superficial surgery. In 42% of the patients requiring pain relief, the test analgesics alone gave sufficient pain relief. The rest needed an additional 5 mg of oxycodone, on average, to be comfortable. The combined use of mild analgesics and oxycodone for adequate pain relief did not seem to reduce the postdrug sedation as compared to oxycodone alone. The results indicate that in traditional clinical dosages LAS, dipyrone or paracetamol can substitute about 5 mg oxycodone but offer sufficient analgesia only in about 40% of the patients recovering from superficial surgery.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed2004

Therapy switching in patients receiving long-acting opioids.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of therapy switching in patients receiving long-acting opioids have not been well documented. OBJECTIVE: To compare therapy switching among patients beginning treatment with controlled-release (CR) oxycodone, transdermal fentanyl, or CR morphine sulfate. METHODS: Using a US healthcare claims database, we identified patients beginning treatment with CR oxycodone, transdermal fentanyl, or CR morphine sulfate between July 1, 1998, and December 31, 1999. We compiled claims for each patient for 6 months following therapy initiation and compared the incidence of therapy switching among the 3 groups. We also estimated total healthcare charges for patients who switched therapy versus those who did not. RESULTS: We identified 1931, 668, and 449 patients beginning therapy with CR oxycodone, transdermal fentanyl, and CR morphine sulfate, respectively; 16.7%, 25.0%, and 35.9%, respectively, had cancer. For patients without cancer, rates of therapy switching at 6 months were 10.6% (CR oxycodone), 19.0% (transdermal fentanyl), and 26.0% (CR morphine sulfate); for those with cancer, rates were 23.8%, 24.6%, and 29.8%, respectively. Multivariate hazard ratios (vs CR morphine sulfate) for therapy switching in patients without cancer were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.47) for CR oxycodone and 0.69 (0.51 to 0.94) for transdermal fentanyl; for those with cancer, corresponding hazard ratios were 0.72 (0.50 to 1.03) and 0.76 (0.50 to 1.16). Total healthcare charges were significantly (p < 0.01) higher for patients who switched therapy than those who did not (23,965 US dollars vs 14,299 US dollars in pts. without cancer; 58,259 US dollars vs 39,618 US dollars for those with cancer). CONCLUSIONS: Patients without cancer who receive CR oxycodone or transdermal fentanyl are less likely to switch therapy than those receiving CR morphine sulfate. Total healthcare charges are higher for patients who switch therapy.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed2006

Oxytrex minimizes physical dependence while providing effective analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in low back pain.

UNLABELLED: Physical dependence or withdrawal is an expected effect of prolonged opioid therapy. Oxytrex (oxycodone + ultralow-dose naltrexone) is an investigational drug shown here to minimize physical dependence while providing strong analgesia with twice-daily dosing. In this 719-patient, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled Phase III clinical trial in chronic low back pain, patients were randomized to receive placebo, oxycodone qid, or oxytrex qid or bid. Each oxytrex tablet contains 1 microg naltrexone; oxytrex bid and qid treatments provide 2 and 4 microg naltrexone/day, respectively. Following a washout, patients with pain >or=5 on a 0-10 scale were dose-escalated weekly from 10 up to 80 mg/day until reaching adequate pain relief (<or=2) or a tolerable level of side effects. Following titration, the dose was fixed for 12 weeks. Active treatment groups attained comparable analgesia despite significantly lower drug use (P = .03) by oxytrex patients. Patients taking oxytrex bid reported 55% less physical dependence than patients on oxycodone (P = .01) by the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale 24 h after treatment cessation. Oxytrex bid patients also reported decreased moderate-to-severe constipation (by 44%, P = .01), somnolence (by 33%, P = .03), and pruritus (by 51%, P < .001). This is the first large well controlled study to show strong analgesia with minimal withdrawal symptoms and better safety compared with oxycodone. PERSPECTIVE: Previous clinical data have shown ultralow-dose naltrexone enhances and prolongs oxycodone analgesia, and preclinical data also show a suppression of opioid tolerance and dependence. A cellular mechanism of action has been demonstrated to be the prevention of aberrant G protein signaling by mu opioid receptors caused by chronic opioid administration.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Antinociceptive and immunosuppressive effects of opiate drugs: a structure-related activity study.

1. Although it is well known that morphine induces significant immunosuppression, the potential immunosuppressive activity of morphine derived drugs commonly used in the treatment of pain (codeine, hydromorphone, oxycodone) has never been evaluated. 2. We evaluated in the mouse the effect of the natural opiates (morphine and codeine) and synthetic derivatives (hydromorphone, oxycodone, nalorphine, naloxone and naltrexone) on antinociceptive thresholds and immune parameters (splenocyte proliferation, Natural Killer (NK) cell activity and interleukin-2 (IL-2) production). 3. Morphine displayed a potent immunosuppressive effect that was not dose-related to the antinociceptive effect, codeine possessed a weak antinociceptive effect and limited immunosuppressive activity; nalorphine, a mu-antagonist and kappa-agonist, exerted a potent immunosuppressive effect, but had very weak antinociceptive activity. The pure kappa-antagonist nor-BNI antagonized the antinociceptive, but not the immunosuppressive effect of nalorphine. 4. Hydromorphone and oxycodone, potent antinociceptive drugs, were devoid of immunosuppressive effects. 5. The pure antagonists naloxone and naltrexone potentiated immune responses. 6. Our data indicate that the C6 carbonyl substitution, together with the presence of a C7-8 single bond potentiates the antinociceptive effect, but abolishes immunosuppression (hydromorphone and oxycodone). 7. The single substitution of an allyl on the piperidinic ring resulted in a molecule that antagonized the antinociceptive effect but maintained the immunosuppressive effect. 8. Molecules that carry modifications of C6, the C7-8 bond and C14, together with an allyl or caboxymethyl group on the piperidinic ring antagonized both the antinociceptive and the immunosuppressive effect of opiates and were themselves immunostimulants.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

I.v. ketoprofen for analgesia after tonsillectomy: comparison of pre- and post-operative administration.

We have evaluated the safety and efficacy of ketoprofen during tonsillectomy in 106 adults receiving standardized anaesthesia. Forty-one patients received ketoprofen 0.5 mg kg(-1) at induction ('pre' ketoprofen group) and 40 patients after surgery ('post' ketoprofen group), in both cases followed by a continuous ketoprofen infusion of 3 mg kg(-1) over 24 h; 25 patients received normal saline (placebo group). Oxycodone was used for rescue analgesia. Patients in the ketoprofen groups experienced less pain than those in the placebo group. There was no difference between the study groups in the proportion of patients who were given oxycodone during the first 4 h after surgery. However, during the next 20 h, significantly more patients in the placebo group (96%) received oxycodone compared with patients in the 'pre' ketoprofen group (66%) and the 'post' ketoprofen group (55%) (P=0.002). Patients in the placebo group received significantly more oxycodone doses than patients in the two ketoprofen groups (P=0.001). Two patients (5%) in the 'pre' ketoprofen group and one (3%) in the 'post' ketoprofen group had post-operative bleeding between 4 and 14 h. All three patients required electrocautery.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Morphine-induced cardiovascular stimulation: the effects of two doses on healthy subjects.

UNLABELLED: In humans, morphine induces hypotension, probably because of histamine liberation. Earlier animal studies have, however, suggested that morphine can induce immediate cardiovascular stimulation when given as a sole medication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the initial effects of morphine on circulation, oxygen consumption, and plasma histamine and catecholamine concentrations. Oxycodone was used as a reference drug. Eight healthy volunteers received, in a random, cross-over, double-blinded fashion: 0.07 mg/kg morphine (M1); 0.14 mg/kg morphine (M2); 0.14 mg/kg oxycodone (O); and placebo (P) as a 2-min IV injection for pain. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and oxygen consumption (VO(2)) were recorded. Plasma histamine and catecholamine concentrations were determined. Both M1 and M2 elicited an initial, but transient, increase in MAP from 84 +/- 5 to 96 +/- 9 mm Hg (P < 0.05) and from 83 +/- 8 to 100 +/- 10 mm Hg (P < 0.05), respectively. A parallel increase in HR was also seen after M1 (from 62 +/- 12 to 70 +/- 10 bpm, P < 0.05) and M2 (from 67 +/- 9 to 78 +/- 8 bpm, P < 0.05). After M2, this was accompanied by a simultaneous increase in VO(2) from 295 +/- 39 mL/min to 322 +/- 61 mL/min (P < 0.05). After O, as well as P, no increase in MAP or HR was detected. Plasma histamine and catecholamine concentrations were not clearly affected by any of the treatments. We conclude that the immediate effect of morphine on the hemodynamics of healthy volunteers was stimulation, not hypotension. This effect was not seen in conjunction with oxycodone, a morphine-like mu-receptor agonist. IMPLICATIONS: In this double-blinded, randomized study, we evaluated whether morphine could induce immediate cardiovascular stimulation, as seen previously in animal studies. In healthy volunteers, during a painful stimulus, morphine caused an initial, transient hemodynamic stimulation, accompanied by increased oxygen consumption, without detectable release of histamine or catecholamines into the plasma. Oxycodone caused only minor hemodynamic alterations.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Propacetamol as adjunctive treatment for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery.

UNLABELLED: Postoperative pain management after cardiac surgery has been mainly based on parenteral opioids. However, because opioids have numerous side effects, coadministration of non-opioid analgesics has been introduced as a method of reducing opioid dose. In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, we evaluated the efficacy of propacetamol, an IV administered prodrug of acetaminophen (paracetamol), as an adjunctive analgesic after cardiac surgery. Seventy-nine patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to receive either propacetamol 2 g (n = 40) or placebo (n = 39) IV in 6-h intervals for 72 h. From the time of extubation, patients had access to an opioid (oxycodone) via a patient-controlled analgesia device. Pain was evaluated on a visual analog scale four times daily, whereas respiratory function tests (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, peak expiratory flow, and arterial blood gas measurements) were performed once a day. The prespecified primary efficacy variable (cumulative oxycodone consumption at the end of the 72-h postoperative period) was 123.5 mg (51.3 mg) (mean [SD]) in the propacetamol group and 141.8 mg (57.5 mg) in the placebo group (difference in mean, 18.3 mg = 13%; 95% confidence interval, 6.1-42.7 mg; P = 0.15). Pain scores did not differ between the groups at rest (P = 0.65) or during a deep breath (P = 0.72). The groups were also similar in terms of pulmonary function tests, postoperative bleeding, and hepatic function tests, and no significant differences were noted in the incidences of adverse effects. After completion of the study, apost hoc analysis was also performed analyzing the first 24 h as split into 6-h intervals. This analysis showed a significantly (P = 0.036) smaller consumption of oxycodone in the propacetamol group at 24 h (47.1 mg [20.7 mg] versus 57.9 mg [23.9 mg]; difference in mean, 10.8 mg; 95% confidence interval, 0.7-20.9 mg). In conclusion, propacetamol did not enhance opioid-based analgesia in coronary artery bypass grafting patients, nor did it decrease cumulative opioid consumption or reduce adverse effects within 3 days after surgery. However, post hoc analysis showed that oxycodone requirement was reduced within the first 24 h in the propacetamol group. IMPLICATIONS: This is the first placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy of propacetamol as a complementary analgesic to opioids after cardiac surgery. Propacetamol did not enhance analgesia, nor did it decrease cumulative opioid consumption or reduce adverse effects in a dose of 2 g given every sixth hour for 3 days after surgery.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed1991

Effect of intravenously administered dexmedetomidine on pain after laparoscopic tubal ligation.

Ninety-six women undergoing laparoscopic tubal ligation were randomized to receive intravenously either 0.2 or 0.4 microgram/kg of dexmedetomidine, 60 micrograms/kg of oxycodone, or 250 micrograms/kg of diclofenac for postoperative pain in a double-blind study design. The study drugs were administered in the recovery room for moderate or severe pain and were repeated until pain subsided or disappeared. In the group receiving diclofenac, 83% of the patients required analgesic supplementation with morphine. This contrasted (P less than 0.01) with 33% of the patients receiving either oxycodone or the higher dose of dexmedetomidine. After the first dose of oxycodone was injected, the visual analogue scale for pain (0%-100%) was reduced from 58% to 33%, whereas corresponding pain relief was only achieved after the third injection of 0.4 microgram/kg of dexmedetomidine. Repeated doses of 0.2 microgram/kg of diclofenac or dexmedetomidine did not reduce the visual analogue scale value by more than 17%. More sedation was seen with the higher dose of dexmedetomidine than with either diclofenac or oxycodone (P less than 0.001). Both doses of dexmedetomidine decreased heart rate when compared with diclofenac (P less than 0.001). In the group given 0.4 microgram/kg of dexmedetomidine, 33% of the patients required atropine for bradycardia. The authors conclude that after laparoscopic tubal ligation, intravenously administered dexmedetomidine relieves pain and reduces opioid drug requirement but is attended by sedation and a high incidence of bradycardia.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

The analgesic efficacy of valdecoxib vs. oxycodone/acetaminophen after oral surgery.

BACKGROUND: The authors conducted two studies to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of the cyclooxygenase, or COX, -2-specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, with oxycodone/ acetaminophen in patients who have undergone oral surgery. METHODS: In total, 205 eligible subjects in Study A and 201 in Study B were randomized to receive a single oral dose of valdecoxib (20 or 40 milligrams), a combination of oxycodone 10 mg/acetaminophen 1,000 mg or placebo. Eligible subjects experienced moderate-to-severe pain within six hours of surgery during which two or more impacted third molars were extracted. Analgesic efficacy was assessed over 24 hours or until the patient required rescue analgesia. RESULTS: In both studies, subjects receiving either dose of valdecoxib experienced a rapid onset of analgesia and (among those who received valdecoxib 40 mg) a level of pain relief comparable with that of those who received oxycodone/ acetaminophen. Both valdecoxib doses had a significantly longer duration of analgesic effect than did oxycodone/acetaminophen. Pooled safety data demonstrated that each valdecoxib dose had a tolerability profile superior to that of oxycodone/ acetaminophen and similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Orally administered valdecoxib is as rapidly acting and effective as oxycodone/acetaminophen, and it has a superior duration of analgesic effect in patients after oral surgery. Valdecoxib has a tolerability profile superior to that of oxycodone/acetaminophen. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The current standard of care for alleviating acute pain after oral surgery has rested largely on conventional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioid/analgesic combination products. The studies reported here suggest that the COX-2-specific inhibitor valdecoxib offers an efficacious and safe alternative to other analgesics used to treat pain after oral surgery.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed1994

Interpleural analgesia for postoperative pain relief in renal surgery patients.

The feasibility of interpleural analgesia for postoperative pain relief after renal surgery using anterior intercostal incision was studied in 16 adult patients. 20 ml bupivacaine plain 5 mg/ml in ten patients, and the same dose of bupivacaine with epinephrine 5 micrograms/ml in six patients, was injected through epidural catheter into the pleural space of the operated side, maximally three times per 24 hours. As additional pain medication, oxycodone i.m. was given if needed. In ten control patients, oxycodone was the only pain medication. Postoperative pain relief in patients who received interpleural bupivacaine plain was excellent in four, moderate in four and poor in two cases. For supplemental pain relief the patients were given 2.1 +/- 1.1 (SEM) injections of oxycodone during the three days. Control patients received, respectively. 11.6 +/- 0.7 injections of oxycodone, and they considered the pain relief excellent in six and moderate in four cases. Median duration of interpleural analgesia was in bupivacaine plain cases 6 h (range 2-14 h) and in bupivacaine with epinephrine 7 h (range 4-15 h). The mean peak serum concentration of bupivacaine plain was 1868 +/- 168 ng/ml, and that of bupivacaine with epinephrine 1312 +/- 273 ng/ml. No complications were seen. The results suggest that interpleural analgesia obtained by 20 ml bupivacaine 5 mg/ml three times a day gives most patients good pain relief.

Bupivacaine↗

PubMed2004

Effectiveness and safety of oral extended-release oxymorphone for the treatment of cancer pain: a pilot study.

GOALS OF WORK: Inadequate analgesia and/or unmanageable adverse events frequently result in the need to rotate patients with cancer pain to a different opioid. The availability of a novel oral extended-release (ER) formulation of oxymorphone provides clinicians with another treatment option. In this study, we assessed the analgesic effectiveness and safety of the new oral ER formulation of oxymorphone following treatment with controlled-release (CR) morphine sulfate or oxycodone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with moderate to severe cancer pain were stabilized for > or =3 days on morphine CR or oxycodone CR, and then treated for 7 days at their stabilized dose. Drug selection was based upon patients' previous use or investigator preference. Patients were then crossed over for 7 days of treatment at an estimated equianalgesic dosage of oxymorphone ER. Pain was assessed using a visual analog scale, and adverse events were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 86 patients entered open-label treatment. Of 34 patients assigned to morphine CR and 52 assigned to oxycodone CR, 21 (61.8%) and 42 (80.8%) completed stabilization and began treatment with oxymorphone ER, respectively; 59 of 63 (93.7%) completed treatment with oxymorphone. There were no significant differences in daily pain intensity scores between oxymorphone ER and comparators (paired t -test). Rescue medication use, expressed as the percent of the daily dose of scheduled opioid, was greater during morphine CR treatment than after crossover to oxymorphone ER (25.2% vs 13.3%; P <0.05, Wilcoxon's test). The tolerability/safety profiles (e.g., nausea, drowsiness, somnolence) were similar for all opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients stabilized on morphine CR or oxycodone CR were safely and rapidly converted to a lower milligram dose of oxymorphone ER that provided adequate pain relief with comparable tolerability. These results justify additional trials with oxymorphone ER.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Trends in medical use and abuse of opioid analgesics.

CONTEXT: Pain often is inadequately treated due in part to reluctance about using opioid analgesics and fear that they will be abused. Although international and national expert groups have determined that opioid analgesics are essential for the relief of pain, little information has been available about the health consequences of the abuse of these drugs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the proportion of drug abuse related to opioid analgesics and the trends in medical use and abuse of 5 opioid analgesics used to treat severe pain: fentanyl, hydromorphone, meperidine, morphine, and oxycodone. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective survey of medical records from 1990 to 1996 stored in the databases of the Drug Abuse Warning Network (source of abuse data) and the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System (source of medical use data). PATIENTS: Nationally representative sample of hospital emergency department admissions resulting from drug abuse. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical use in grams and grams per 100,000 population and mentions of drug abuse by number and percentage of the population. RESULTS: From 1990 to 1996, there were increases in medical use of morphine (59%; 2.2 to 3.5 million g), fentanyl (1168%; 3263 to 41,371 g), oxycodone (23%; 1.6 to 2.0 million g), and hydromorphone (19%; 118,455 to 141,325 g), and a decrease in the medical use of meperidine (35%; 5.2 to 3.4 million g). During the same period, the total number of drug abuse mentions per year due to opioid analgesics increased from 32,430 to 34,563 (6.6%), although the proportion of mentions for opioid abuse relative to total drug abuse mentions decreased from 5.1% to 3.8%. Reports of abuse decreased for meperidine (39%; 1335 to 806), oxycodone (29%; 4526 to 3190), fentanyl (59%; 59 to 24), and hydromorphone (15%; 718 to 609), and increased for morphine (3%; 838 to 865). CONCLUSIONS: The trend of increasing medical use of opioid analgesics to treat pain does not appear to contribute to increases in the health consequences of opioid analgesic abuse.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Analgesic efficacy of zomepirac sodium in patients with pain due to cancer.

In a single-dose, a double-blind crossover study in 40 patients with chronic pain due to advanced cancer, zomepirac sodium (Zomax), a new, single-entity, non-narcotic analgesic, was compared to oxycodone with APC (Percodan) and placebo. Both a verbal and a curvilinear visual analog scale were used in the study, and the results obtained were comparable. Zomepirac sodium, 100 mg, provided analgesia equal to oxycodone with APC in all assessments of pain intensity and pain relief. The analgesic activity of zomepirac sodium was apparent by 1 hour, reached a peak between 3 and 4 hours after administration, and lasted at least 6 hours. Zomepirac sodium, 100 mg, appears to be an acceptable alternative to narcotic combinations such as oxycodone with APC in the management of moderate to severe cancer pain. The visual analog scale presented appears to be useful in the evaluation of analgesic efficacy and appears to be acceptable as an alternative to the more conventional verbal scale.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Intravenous ketorolac vs diclofenac for analgesia after maxillofacial surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of the non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), ketorolac and diclofenac in prevention of pain after maxillofacial surgery. METHODS: Sixty ASA I-II patients (30 in each group) received randomly, and double blindly either ketorolac 0.4 mg.kg-1 or diclofenac 1.0 mg.kg-1 iv after general anaesthesia induction, before surgical incision. In the ketorolac group, the same dose was repeated iv three times at six hour intervals. The diclofenac group patients received diclofenac 1.0 mg.kg-1 after 12 hr iv. Rescue analgesic medication consisting of oxycodone 0.03 mg.kg-1 iv, was administered by a patient controlled analgesia apparatus. RESULTS: Two patients in the ketorolac and three patients in the diclofenac group did not need oxycodone during the study period. On average, 12 and 11 doses of oxycodone were needed in the ketorolac and the diclofenac groups, respectively (NS). Side-effects were similar in both groups. All patients except one were satisfied with the pain therapy. CONCLUSION: Parenteral ketorolac (0.4 mg.kg-1 four times in 24 hr) and diclofenac (1 mg.kg-1 twice in 24 hr) were similar, but insufficient alone, for analgesia after maxillofacial surgery.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Oral analgesia compared with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether oral analgesia with oxycodone-acetaminophen or a patient-controlled analgesia device with morphine provides superior analgesia after cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: Ninety-three patients with scheduled cesarean delivery were assigned randomly to receive either oral analgesia with oxycodone-acetaminophen or a morphine patient-controlled analgesia device. At 6 and 24 hours after the procedure, pain was assessed on a visual analog pain scale of 0 to 10. Nausea, sedation, pruritus, ambulation, emesis, and oral fluid intake were also assessed. RESULTS: Patients who used oral analgesia without a patient-controlled analgesia device experienced less pain at 6 and 24 hours after cesarean delivery. They also had less nausea and drowsiness at 6 hours but slightly more nausea at 24 hours. CONCLUSION: Oral analgesia with oxycodone-acetaminophen may offer superior pain control after cesarean delivery with fewer side-effects as compared with morphine patient-controlled analgesia. Consideration should be given to expanding the use of oral analgesia in patients immediately after cesarean delivery.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed2005

Trends in abuse of Oxycontin and other opioid analgesics in the United States: 2002-2004.

UNLABELLED: OxyContin (Purdue Pharma L.P., Stamford, Conn) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1995 as a sustained-release preparation of oxycodone hydrochloride and was thought to have much lower abuse potential than immediate-release oxycodone because of its slow-release properties. However, beginning in 2000, widespread reports of OxyContin abuse surfaced. In response, Purdue Pharma L.P. sponsored the development of a proactive abuse surveillance program, named the Researched Abuse, Diversion and Addiction-Related Surveillance (RADARS) system. In this paper, we describe results obtained from one aspect of RADARS--the use of drug abuse experts (ie, key informants)--as a source of data on the prevalence and magnitude of abuse of prescription drugs. The results indicate that prescription drug abuse has become prevalent, with cases reported in 60% of the zip codes surveyed. The prevalence of abuse was rank ordered as follows: OxyContin >or= hydrocodone > other oxycodone > methadone > morphine > hydromorphone > fentanyl > buprenorphine. In terms of the magnitude of abuse (>or=5 cases/100,000 persons in a 3-digit zip code), modest growth was seen with all analgesics over the 10 calendar quarters we monitored, but was most pronounced with OxyContin and hydrocodone. These results indicate that OxyContin abuse is a pervasive problem in this country, but that it needs to be considered in the context of a general pattern of increasing prescription drug abuse. PERSPECTIVE: Over the past 5 years, there have been reports, frequently anecdotal, that opioid analgesic abuse has evolved into a national epidemic. In this study, we report systematic data to indicate that opioid analgesic abuse has in fact increased among street and recreational drug users, with OxyContin and hydrocodone products the most frequently abused. Steps need to be taken to reduce prescription drug abuse, but very great care needs to be exercised in the nature of these actions so the legitimate and appropriate use of these drugs in the treatment of pain is not compromised as a result.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Safety and efficacy of diclofenac ophthalmic solution in the treatment of corneal abrasions.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of diclofenac ophthalmic solution is a safe and effective analgesic in the treatment of traumatic corneal abrasions in the emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Consenting consecutive patients with corneal abrasions who presented to a community-based ED from August through February 1998 were randomly assigned to receive either diclofenac or control vehicle drops. Pain relief was measured using a visual Numeric Pain Intensity Scale (NPIS) before and after treatment. Exclusion criteria were as follows: age younger than 18 years, pregnancy, history of glaucoma, ocular infection, recent eye surgery, other signs of ocular trauma, narcotics within 6 hours, minimal pain (NPIS score <3), and any allergy to diclofenac or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Patients were discharged with study drug or control vehicle solution, a topical antibiotic, oxycodone-acetaminophen as a rescue analgesic, and a pain diary. The outcome measurements were improvement in NPIS score 2 hours after treatment, use of oxycodone-acetaminophen, and occurrence of any adverse effects. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were enrolled in the study; 25 received diclofenac and 24 received control vehicle drops. Both groups were similar in gender, age, pretreatment pain duration, NPIS score, and analgesic use. There was significantly greater improvement in the 2-hour NPIS score in the diclofenac group (3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3 to 4) compared with the control group (1.0; 95% CI 0.1 to 2.0). The difference between the 2 groups was 2.1+/-1.3 (95% CI 0.8 to 3.4). There was a trend toward fewer patients taking rescue oxycodone-acetaminophen in the diclofenac group (20%; 95% CI 4% to 36%) versus the control group (42%; 95% CI 22% to 62%). Other than transient mild stinging, there were no complications associated with diclofenac use. CONCLUSION: Diclofenac ophthalmic solution appears to be a safe and effective analgesic in the treatment of traumatic corneal abrasions in the ED.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed2002

Comparison of the opioid-sparing efficacy of diclofenac and ketoprofen for 3 days after knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Comparative postoperative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) studies in orthopedic patients have usually been restricted in time to the first postoperative day. The opioid-sparing effect of NSAIDs may be beneficial postoperatively as long as pain otherwise restricts ambulation and rehabilitation. We therefore compared the analgesic efficacy of the maximum recommended doses of diclofenac and ketoprofen for 3 days after knee arthroplasty. METHODS: We studied 64 knee arthroplasty patients, operated on under spinal anesthesia. In a randomized, double-blind and placebo-controlled fashion, the patients received either i.v. diclofenac 75 mg (n = 24), ketoprofen 100 mg (n = 24) or saline (n = 16) in the recovery room, followed by oral diclofenac 150 mg/day, ketoprofen 300 mg/day or placebo, respectively, for 3 days, supplemented by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. oxycodone. RESULTS: The mean consumption of oxycodone during the first, second and third study days was 45.3, 22.3 and 15.2 mg in the diclofenac group, 43.5, 37.5 and 21.8 mg in the ketoprofen group, and 61.2, 45.9 and 36.1 mg, respectively, in the placebo group. Oxycodone consumption was significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the ketoprofen group than in the placebo group in the postoperative period 13-24 h and 61-72 h. Diclofenac was superior to placebo in the postoperative period 25-48 h (P < 0.01), 49-60 h (P < 0.05) and to ketoprofen at 49-60 h (P < 0.05). During administration of diclofenac on days 1-3 and ketoprofen on day 2, the mean pain scores (VAS) were lower than in the placebo group (P < 0.05). Six patients had difficulties in operating the PCA device. There were no differences in blood loss. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in the first day after knee arthroplasty (13-24 h), ketoprofen exerted an opioid-sparing effect. After day 1 (25-60 h), with the doses used, diclofenac proved to be better than placebo, whereas ketoprofen was not.

Adult↗