PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Procedural Sedation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Flumazenil reversal of midazolam sedation for dental procedures.

The efficacy of flumazenil in the reversal of midazolam sedation was assessed in double-blind placebo controlled study. Thirty patients undergoing oral surgical procedures were included. Flumazenil administration was followed by immediate rise of the CNS functions scores to almost the baseline awake values. Compared to control group, patients were significantly more oriented and had better comprehension up to 15 minutes, more alert for 30 minutes and had better memory function up to 60 minutes. Peripheral oxygen saturation was significantly higher up to 15 minutes. Flumazenil allows better utilization and higher turn over rate where space and nursing resources are scarce.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Ketamine sedation for pediatric critical care procedures.

OBJECTIVES: To describe our experience using ketamine sedation to facilitate pediatric critical care procedures, and to document the safety profile of ketamine in this setting. DESIGN: Retrospective consecutive case series. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary children's hospital. PATIENTS: Children receiving ketamine for procedural sedation over a 5-year period. INTERVENTIONS: We reviewed patient records to determine indication, dosing, adverse events, inadequate sedation, and recovery time for each sedation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive features of sedation including adverse events. RESULTS: During the study period, children in our pediatric intensive care unit received ketamine at total of 442 times to facilitate a wide variety of critical care procedures, most commonly central line placement, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and wound debridement. Most study children had substantial underlying illness (ASA > or = 3 in 88%; ASA > or = 4 in 39%). Inadequate sedation was noted in only nine (2%) procedures. Adverse effects included transient laryngospasm (n = 9), transient partial airway obstruction (n = 5), apnea with bradycardia (n = 1), emesis during the procedure (n = 2), emesis during recovery (n = 9), mild recovery agitation (n = 10), moderate-to-severe recovery agitation (n = 1), and excessive salivation (n = 4). There were no adverse outcomes attributable to ketamine. CONCLUSION: Pediatric intensivists skilled in ketamine administration can safely and effectively administer this drug to facilitate critical care procedures. Despite the ill nature of our patient sample, adverse effects were uncommon.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Safety of propofol for conscious sedation during endoscopic procedures in high-risk patients-a prospective, controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Propofol, a rapidly-acting hypnotic agent, is increasingly being used for endoscopic sedation. Serious adverse effects, including respiratory and cardiovascular depression, make many endoscopists reluctant to use propofol in critically ill patients. This study characterizes propofol's safety profile in consecutive high-risk patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists [ASA] classes III and IV) compared with matched subjects (ASA classes I and II). METHODS: During a 19-month period, 1370 at risk-patients were sedated with propofol, of whom 47% (614 ASA III, 28 ASA IV) were age matched with 642 consecutive patients of the same gender and age assigned to ASA classes I and II and undergoing the same endoscopic procedures (395 gastroscopies, 201 colonoscopies, 14 combined). Registered nurses performed all sedations by propofol dose titration while carefully monitoring arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, and blood pressure. RESULTS: No major complications occurred among the critically ill patients. There was, however, an increased risk for a short relevant oxygen desaturation (<90%) of 3.6% for ASA III and IV versus 1.7% for ASA I and II (p = 0.036). In four versus one case, short mask ventilation was necessary. Also, a greater proportion of patients showed a > or =5% oxygen saturation decrease. There was no pronounced influence on arterial pressure or heart rate and no perforations in 336 colonoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: With careful monitoring, propofol sedation during GI endoscopies is safe, even for high-risk patients. Considering their higher comorbidity and tendency toward oxygen desaturation, they need particularly careful monitoring, and the required dose is, on mean, 10-20% lower than in ASA classes I and II.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Sedation for pediatric procedures, using ketamine and midazolam, in a primarily adult intensive care unit: a retrospective evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pediatric procedures performed by adult critical care practitioners, using the combination of ketamine and midazolam for anesthesia and sedation. DESIGN: A retrospective case series. SETTING: The intensive care unit (ICU) of a 325-bed tertiary research hospital. PATIENTS: Individuals from 1 to 18 yrs of age who had intravenous midazolam sedation and ketamine anesthesia administered while undergoing lumbar puncture, bone biopsy, central venous catheter placement, liver biopsy, thoracentesis, or bone marrow aspirate/biopsy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A retrospective chart review was performed. The dosages of medications used were tabulated, and milligram per kilogram dosages were calculated. The procedures performed, their durations, and any complications of the anesthesia and sedation were noted. These complications included: oxygen desaturations <90%, vital sign alterations requiring intervention, rashes, subjective complaints of dizziness by the patient, and emergence reactions to ketamine. A total of 127 pediatric patients were admitted to the ICU sedation area for a total of 295 procedures. All patients received ketamine and midazolam intravenously in divided doses and titrated to effect. A total of nine complications were observed. These complications included oxygen desaturation <90% (n = 1), vital sign alterations requiring treatment (n = 3), rash (n = 2), dizziness (n = 1), wheezing (n = 1), and emergence reaction (n = 1). No patient required admission to the ICU because of a complication. There were no episodes of bradycardia or other cardiopulmonary compromise. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric anesthesia and sedation, using ketamine and midazolam, can be performed in a designated monitored setting, outside of the operating room, by experienced personnel, including nonpediatricians. This therapeutic combination allows painful procedures to be performed with less anxiety and discomfort. In experienced hands, a limited number of side effects occur.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Endoscopist controlled administration of propofol: an effective and safe method of sedation in endoscopic procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Propofol is a short-acting, hypnotic agent that is increasingly being used for gastrointestinal endoscopic sedation. There are concerns about the use of propofol by non anesthesiologists due to its potential for respiratory and cardiovascular depression. This report describes our experience concerning effectiveness and safety of propofol administered in endoscopic procedures by the endoscopist and the assistant nurse. METHODS: In this prospective study, a total of 102 consecutive endoscopies (60 colonoscopies and 42 upper endoscopies) performed under sedation with propofol were included. In 27 (26.47%) endoscopies propofol was administered alone and in 75 endoscopies (73.53%) it was combined with benzodiazepines and/or opioids. Seventy-six (74.51%) endoscopies were performed in patients under 65 years of age and 26 (25.49%) in patients over 65 years of age. Ninety-one (89.22%) endoscopies were performed in patients with low surgical risk (ASA I-II) and 11 (10.78%) in patients with high surgical risk. The medication was administered by the endoscopist that performed the procedure and the assistant nurse. RESULTS: The mean dose of propofol used was 72.14 mg for gastroscopies and 71.33 for colonoscopies (p = 0.92). The mean dose of propofol when infused alone was 84.81 mg whereas in combination with benzodiazepines/opioids was 66.93 mg (p = 0.06). The doses of propofol required were lower for those colonoscopies in which midazolam and/or meperidine was combined and in patients over 65 years of age (p = 0.006 y p = 0.001, respectively). Eleven (10.8%) minor complications were reported, and managed by the own endoscopist. Patients had no memories of the procedure. The tolerance rated by the endoscopist was excellent-good, fair, bad-very bad in 83, 5 and 12% of the gastroscopies and in 79, 8 and 13% of the colonoscopies respectively. Nevertheless bad tolerance did not hinder the completion of the procedure in any case. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of propofol by the endoscopist and the assistant nurse, is an effective and safe method of sedation in patients of low and high-risk as well as in elderly patients. The doses of propofol required for an adequate sedation were lower in patients over 65 years of age and for colonoscopies in which medication was combined.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1990

Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: Part 2, Review and implications.

Ketamine produces rapid and consistent pediatric sedation with a predictable onset and recovery time. A wide margin of safety is afforded without the respiratory and cardiovascular depression commonly seen with alternative agents. The efficacy of ketamine is well established in anesthesia and dentistry and has extensive applications in other specialties. Ketamine sedation facilitates superior technical and cosmetic results while minimizing emotional trauma to distraught children. The much-feared complications of aspiration and laryngospasm are extremely rare when ketamine is used with proper precautions. Ketamine deserves increased use in the ED, and we advocate additional clinical investigation in this setting.

Child↗
PubMed2006

Guidelines for monitoring and management of pediatric patients during and after sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures: an update.

The safe sedation of children for procedures requires a systematic approach that includes the following: no administration of sedating medication without the safety net of medical supervision; careful presedation evaluation for underlying medical or surgical conditions that would place the child at increased risk from sedating medications; appropriate fasting for elective procedures and a balance between depth of sedation and risk for those who are unable to fast because of the urgent nature of the procedure; a focused airway examination for large tonsils or anatomic airway abnormalities that might increase the potential for airway obstruction; a clear understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of the medications used for sedation, as well as an appreciation for drug interactions; appropriate training and skills in airway management to allow rescue of the patient; age- and size-appropriate equipment for airway management and venous access; appropriate medications and reversal agents; sufficient numbers of people to carry out the procedure and monitor the patient; appropriate physiologic monitoring during and after the procedure; a properly equipped and staffed recovery area; recovery to presedation level of consciousness before discharge from medical supervision; and appropriate discharge instructions. This report was developed through a collaborative effort of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry to offer pediatric providers updated information and guidance in delivering safe sedation to children.

Child↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A premix of 50% nitrous oxide - 50% oxygen for sedation during dental procedures.

The use of a premixed source of 50% N(2)O and 50% O(2) diluted with room air was evaluated in a series of 32 patients undergoing a routine dental procedure. Dependent variables observed were the flow rates of gas necessary to achieve adequate sedation, patient acceptance of the administration method and clinical signs of hypoxia. The median flow rate observed when patients were sedated was 3 liters per minute (range 1 to 5 liters per minute). Twenty-four patients tolerated the dental procedure without need to alter the initial dose, 6 required an increased dose and 2 required less of the gas mixture. No clinical signs of diffusion hypoxia were noted in this small sample. The results of this open clinical evaluation suggest that use of a premixture of 50% N(2)O and 50% O(2) results in adequate sedation, is well tolerated by patients and dose not result in any clinically obvious signs of hypoxia.

Adolescent↗