SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Chagas' disease is endemic in South America, affecting several million people. Megacolon, the commonest intestinal manifestation, causes severe constipation and usually requires surgery. We report a case which was treated by restorative proctocolectomy. We believe this to be a useful new technique in the treatment of this condition.
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to compare functional results, complications, preoperative durations of disease, and rates of dysplasia and neoplasia between older and younger chronic ulcerative colitis patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with mucosectomy. METHODS: A total of 392 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of chronic ulcerative colitis underwent elective RPC with mucosection and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis. Pathologic reports were reviewed, with specific reference to findings of dysplasia or cancer. Functional results concerning the number of bowel movements per 24 hour period and the incidence of fecal soilage were obtained by direct or telephone patient interview. FINDINGS: Group I consisted of 326 patients aged 5 to 49 (mean, 30.9) years and 160 women. Group II comprised 66 patients aged 50 to 74 (mean, 56.9) years and 29 women. Duration of disease was significantly longer in the older group (6.2 vs. 15.6 years; P < 0.001). The older group had significantly higher rates of dysplasia (29/326 vs. 19/66; P < 0.0001) and malignancy (14/326 vs. 9/66; P = 0.003). Rates of complication, hospital days following RPC, and total hospital days for all causes were comparable between groups. Perfect day-time continence was observed in 81.6 percent of Group I and 80 percent of Group II patients (213/261 vs. 40/50; P = 0.79). Perfect continence during sleep was observed in 65.1 percent of Group I and 62 percent of Group II patients (170/261 vs. 31/50; P = 0.67). Mean number of bowel movements per 24 hour period for Group I was 6.3 +/- 0.2 and for Group II was 7.4 +/- 0.5. Mean difference, one movement per 24 hours, was not significant (95 percent confidence interval, -0.02 to 2.1; t = 1.95, P = 0.055). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that patients older than 50 years are suitable candidates for RPC with mucosectomy. Functional results and complication rates are similar to those observed among younger patients. Patients older than 50 years have a significantly higher rate of concurrent dysplasia and malignant degeneration than younger patients, most probably because of a longer duration of disease. RPC with mucosal excision potentially lowers this risk by elimination of all colorectal mucosa.
The development of stapling instruments has obviated the need to perform anal mucosectomy for ulcerative colitis, but the potential exists for continued inflammation and, perhaps, malignant change. We reviewed the pathology specimens of patients who had had restorative proctocolectomy, to determine the incidence and severity of inflammation in the anal mucosa.
PURPOSE: The rectoanal inhibitory reflex has an important role in fecal sampling and discrimination of rectal contents. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of rectoanal inhibitory reflex after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for mucosal ulcerative colitis. METHODS: The medical records of 345 patients who underwent ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from September 1988 to May 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred patients who underwent double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and had anorectal physiology testing within 3 months before surgery as well as after ileostomy closure (mean, 23.1; range, 3-77 months) were analyzed. Anorectal physiology testing included detecting the presence of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, sensory threshold volume, and rectal or pouch capacity and compliance. Parameters to determine incontinence included daytime and nocturnal bowel movement frequency, nocturnal spotting, status of continence for solid or liquid stool, gas, use of pads, and lifestyle alteration were surveyed in 62 of the 100 patients at a mean of 3.9 (range, 1-9.1) years to determine the incontinence score. RESULTS: Whereas the rectoanal inhibitory reflex was noted in 96 (96 percent) patients before surgery, it was found in only 53 (53 percent) after ileostomy closure (P < 0.0001). Incontinence status data was available in only 62 of the 100 patients (32 RAIR-positive; 30 RAIR-negative). There were no significant differences between the rectoanal inhibitory reflex-positive and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex-negative groups relative to the interval between surgery and manometry (22 vs 25 months), postoperative threshold sensation volume (32 vs 31 ml), postoperative compliance (19 vs 12 cm H(2)O/ml), postoperative capacity (85 66 ml), daytime/nighttime stool frequency (6.2/2 vs 5.5/1.5), or postoperative incontinence score (3.9 vs 1.8). However, there were significant differences relative to the incidence of nocturnal soiling (12/30 (40 percent) 23/32 (72 percent), P = 0.0012) favoring the presence of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex. CONCLUSION: Preservation of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex correlated with a decrease in the incidence of nocturnal soiling after double-stapled ileoanal reservoir construction.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to consider whether adenomas in the resection margins could represent a risk factor for pouch polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients. METHODS: We reviewed 46 patients treated by restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for FAP: 9 hand-sewn and 37 stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). We analyzed the presence of polyps in the doughnuts from stapled anastomosis and in the resection margins from hand-sewn anastomosis. The presence of polyps in the IPAA was then assessed in 30 patients (6 hand-sewn and 24 stapled IPAA): 4 from the histology of the excised pouch and 26 by endoscopy (range 4 months to 12 years after operation, mean 6 years). RESULTS: Surprisingly, pouch adenomas were found in only 2 of 30 (7%) of patients, 1 of 6 hand-sewn and 1 of 24 stapled anastomosis (P > 0.1), 9 and 11 years, respectively, after operation. However, there were 6 patients with inflammatory (3), fibroepithelial (2), or lymphoid (1) polyps. The risk of pouch adenomas after 8 years was 20% (P < 0.05). Pouch adenomas were found in 1 of 11 patients having adenomas in the margins or in the doughnuts (9%) and in 1 of 19 with no adenomas at the margins (5%; P > 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of pouch adenomas was low. There was no correlation between adenomas in the resection margins and the development of pouch adenomas.
A 32-year-old man with ulcerative colitis had a colectomy for toxic colitis. Later, a rectal mucosectomy was performed along with the creation of a pelvic pouch. In 1998, approximately 10 years after this staged restorative proctocolectomy was completed, endoscopic examination of the pelvic pouch detected a small mucosal polypoid mass lesion. Although the lesion had the macroscopic appearance of an inflammatory polyp, microscopic sections of the resected lesion revealed dysplastic changes. Endoscopic polypectomy was performed to remove the lesion, and further histological surveillance examinations of the pelvic pouch have not detected additional dysplastic mucosal changes.
Surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is still controversial. From 1984 we carried out a prospective evaluation of total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) and restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) to determine differences in postoperative complications, functional results, occurrence of desmoids, and recurrence of polyps in the rectal stump. IRA was performed below the peritoneal reflection and was indicated in the absence of rectal cancer and in the presence of fewer than 10 polyps or minute polyposis in the last 10 cm of the rectal mucosa. IRA patients underwent a regular endoscopic follow-up and prolonged sulindac administration (100 mg twice daily). When criteria for IRA were absent, IPAA was performed adopting a manual anastomosis at the pectinate line. Fourteen patients were operated with IRA and 24 with IPAA. There was no difference in sex and age between the two groups of patients. The number of rectal polyps was significantly different in the two groups. Immediate postoperative complications were observed in only five IPAA patients, three of whom (12%) required reoperation. Late postoperative complications occurred more frequently in IRA patients (14%) than in IPAA patients (4%). Desmoids developed in both groups (five in the IRA group and four in IPAA group). The number of bowel movements was similar in both groups, but 25% of IPAA patients complained of nocturnal fecal soiling. Fulguration or polypectomy for recurrent polyps was necessary in all but two IRA patients at follow-up. The rectal stump was easily eradicated by polyps in all but four patients with minute polyps at surgery. In the latter patients a diffuse or carpeting rectal polyposis occurred. IPAA can give optimum control of colorectal polyposis in FAP patients with an acceptable incidence of postoperative complications and satisfactory functional results. This type of surgical procedure is indicated in most FAP patients, and IRA should be reserved for patients without polyps or with fewer than 10 polyps in the rectal stump; otherwise growth of polyps cannot be adequately controlled.
PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the value of MRI in diagnosing pouch-related fistulas in patients with ulcerative colitis and to compare pulse sequences with and without contrast enhancement in their performance of visualization. METHOD: Forty-four patients with pelvic symptoms after restorative proctocolectomy underwent MRI. All 26 patients with pouch-related fistulas were treated surgically; 18 patients with pouchitis were treated conservatively. MRI was performed at 1.0 T with T1-weighted FLASH sequences before and after administration of Gd-DTPA, T2-weighted and proton density-weighted turbo SE sequences, and a T2-weighted fat saturation sequence. Images were analyzed for the presence of fistula; pulse sequences were additionally compared for best visualization on a four point scale of diagnostic confidence. RESULTS: MRI detected 23 of 26 cases of fistulas; there were no false-positive diagnoses. Surgery revealed fistulas in three cases in which no pathology was found on MRI. Two patients had a short sinus tract at the pouch-anal anastomosis, and a third patient had a pouch-vaginal fistula. The Gd-enhanced FLASH sequence obtained the highest score, and second best was the T2-weighted fat saturation technique. CONCLUSION: MRI is a valuable technique for diagnosing pouch-related fistulas, However, there are limitations in detection of short sinus tracts and pouch-vaginal fistulas. Highest diagnostic confidence is obtained with a Gd-enhanced FLASH sequence, which might be helpful after pelvic surgery or if the fact saturation technique is equivocal.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We evaluated the incidence of dysplasia in the mucosectomy area using resected specimens to determine preoperative risk factors for the occurrence of dysplasia in this area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied a consecutive series of 137 patients, each of whom underwent a restorative proctocolectomy with a mucosectomy and hand-sewn ileal J-pouch anal anastomosis between January 2003 and December 2004. Sections from the anal transitional zone mucosa were taken from the dentate line to 2.5 cm above the resected line and stained with hematoxylin and eosin then characterized as indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, and high-grade dysplasia based on the criteria of an international working group for rectal mucosal atypia. RESULTS: Dysplasia of the mucosectomy area was present in six (4.4%) of the patients, including one with low-grade and five with high-grade dysplasia. A multivariate analysis showed relations between age at time of surgery (>or=40 years) and duration of disease (>or=10 years) with a risk for development of mucosectomy area dysplasia. CONCLUSION: The incidence of dysplasia of the mucosectomy area was 4.4%, and preoperative risk factors were shown to be duration of disease and age at time of surgery.
BACKGROUND: The clinical syndrome of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), diagnosed in about 5% of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), has been shown to be associated with pouchitis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether UC patients with cholangitis on liver biopsy at proctocolectomy, with or without the clinical syndrome of PSC, have an increased risk of inflammatory changes in the ileal reservoir mucosa and clinical pouchitis. METHODS: Of the consecutive 81 UC patients treated with restorative proctocolectomy with ileal J reservoir at Tampere University Hospital between 1985 and 1991, 73 with peroperative liver biopsy were included. A peroperative liver biopsy was obtained during proctocolectomy. After a median follow up of 64 months, pouch biopsy specimens were obtained. Periods of clinical pouchitis were diagnosed by means of clinical criteria alone or by clinical criteria combined with the results of previous pouch endoscopies in all patients. RESULTS: Ten patients (14%) showed histologic features consistent with small-duct PSC on liver biopsy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography had previously been performed on four of these patients, and all four had large-duct PSC. Patients with cholangitis had significantly more severe chronic, but not acute, inflammation in the pouch mucosa than patients without cholangitis. At least one episode of pouchitis occurred in 30% of the patients without cholangitis as compared with 90% of the patients with cholangitis. Chronic pouchitis was more frequent in the group with cholangitis than in the group without it (70% versus 11%). CONCLUSIONS: The only means of detecting all UC patients with cholangitis is a liver biopsy. Cholangitis, either with the clinical syndrome of PSC or found on liver biopsy, seems to be a risk factor for chronic-type inflammatory changes in the pouch mucosa and for the development of pouchitis.
BACKGROUND: Chronic distal colitis may cause troublesome symptoms and alter quality of life. When medical treatment fails to control symptoms, patients and doctors are often reluctant to consider surgical resection because of the relatively small portion of the large bowel affected by the disease. AIM: To assess the outcome of restorative proctocolectomy (RP) in patients with distal colitis who required surgery for chronic debilitating symptoms and failed medical management. PATIENTS/METHODS: From 1986 to 1996, of 263 patients receiving RP for ulcerative colitis, 27 (16 men) were operated on for distal ulcerative colitis limited to the rectum and sigmoid colon. Bowel function and quality of life were compared before and one year after RP. RESULTS: The mean (SD) duration of ulcerative colitis was 11 (6) years. RP was performed at a mean age of 46 (10) years. All the pouches were J-shaped, and a diverting loop ileostomy was always performed. Mean (SD) hospital stay was 25 (10) days. Seven complications occurred in six patients. Previously unknown severe dysplasia was discovered on the colectomy specimen in two patients. After RP there was a significant decrease in mean (SD) daytime stool frequency (8.2 (4) v 4.7 (2), p<0.05), night-time stool frequency (2 (2) v 1 (1), p = 0.05), and the number of patients with urgency to defecate (26/27 v 1/27, p<0.001). Sex life was improved in eight patients, social life in 26, and professional life in eight. Twenty six patients were satisfied with the results, and 25 wished that they had received surgery earlier in the course of their disease. CONCLUSION: RP can improve bowel function and quality of life in patients with disabling chronic symptoms of distal ulcerative colitis.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The reported risk of small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after major abdominal surgery varies. The aim of this study was to study frequency and risk factors of SBO after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Review of the medical records of 188 patients operated with restorative proctocolectomy between 1985 and 1997. All admissions to the hospital were registered and symptoms and X-ray findings consistent with ileus were analysed in relation to preoperative and operative data. RESULTS: SBO was the dominating cause of hospitalization. Forty-eight patients (25.5%) had developed SBO after a median of 76 (range 6-196) months of follow-up, of whom 26 were operated on. The cause of obstruction was adhesion in all but one patient. Early obstruction events were common and accounted for 27% of all operations. Twenty-five of 26 patients who were operated on had a diverting loop-ileostomy compared to 111/162 in the not-operated-on group (p < 0.01). In total, 696 days were spent at the hospital because of SBO. CONCLUSION: SBO is common following pouch surgery and is the dominating cause of hospitalization postoperatively. About 25% of patients developed SBO and half of them needed surgery. The use of a diverting loop-ileostomy was related to an increased risk of surgery for SBO.
BACKGROUND: Epidural anesthesia as a perioperative adjunct has been shown to provide superior pain control and has been implicated in more rapid ileus resolution after major abdominal surgery, possibly through a sympatholytic mechanism. Studies suggest that the vertebral level of epidural administration influences these parameters. METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine patients (120 male, 59 female; average age, 36 years) underwent restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis between 1989 and 1995. Patients were grouped according to type of anesthesia. Group THO (n = 53) received thoracic (T6 to T10) epidurals. Group LUM (n = 51) received lumbar (L2 to L4) epidurals, and group PCA (n = 75) received patient-controlled intravenous narcotic analgesia. Patients were compared for complications, perioperative risk factors, postoperative pain, and ileus resolution. RESULTS: Epidural narcotics, alone or combined with local anesthetics, were administered for an average of 2 (LUM) to 4 (THO) days without significant complications. Infrequent problems related to the epidural catheters included self-limited headaches or back pain (four) and site infections (two). Epidural failure, as measured by conversion to PCA for inadequate pain control, was not significantly greater for LUM (25%) than THO (23%). Average pain scores, rated daily on a visual analog scale, were significantly higher (indicating more pain) for PCA patients (4.2) during postoperative days 1 through 5 than for LUM (3.5) (p < 0.05) and for THO (2.4) (p < 0.05). Ileus resolution, as determined by stool output and return of bowel sounds, was significantly faster in THO than in LUM or PCA (p < 0.05). Resolution of ileus was not significantly different between PCA and LUM (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Thoracic epidural analgesia has distinct advantages over both lumbar epidural or traditional patient-controlled analgesia in shortening parameters measuring postoperative ileus and in reducing surgical pain. The procedure is safe and associated with low morbidity. Thoracic epidural anesthesia is also economically justifiable and may prove to impact significantly on future postoperative management by reducing length of hospitalization. Our data and those of others are most striking in these regards for patients with thoracic catheters, indicating the importance of vertebral level in epidural drug administration.
This is a case report on FAP in a 41-year-old woman in which preoperative examination showed a giant tubulovillous adenoma of the descending duodenum surrounding the papilla of Vater, in addition to pancolon adenomatous polyposis, and isolated adenomas in the gastric antrum and corpus. As it was impossible to remove the giant villous adenoma in the duodenum endoscopically, prophylactic surgical treatment was chosen consisting of restorative proctocolectomy and additional pancreaticoduodenectomy. Flat tubulovillous adenomas in the gastric corpus were successfully removed by total snare biopsies before operation. FAP coli patients treated by prophylactic surgery are now known to be at risk of developing adenomas anywhere in the intestine and many affected patients later die from upper gastrointestinal tumors. In this single case report, the simultaneous occurrence of FAP coli and giant villous adenoma of the duodenum indicates the frequent outcome of this genetic alteration requiring lifelong surveillance. This rare case report includes a short survey of the relevant literature.
UNLABELLED: Severe acute ulcerative colitis unresponsive to medical management is characterized by multiple associated risk factors including anemia, hypoproteinemia, and high steroid requirements when urgent surgery is required. Current surgical options include use of primary ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) vs. historic trends favoring colectomy with ileostomy. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of primary IPAA in patients with severe colitis, we reviewed our own experience in 20 patients with this condition. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary restorative proctocolectomy included 13 males and 7 females (mean age, 30.5 +/- 2.4 years). Exclusion criteria for primary reconstruction included septic patients and patients with associated medical conditions such as pulmonary or cardiovascular disease. History of ulcerative colitis averaged 3.1 +/- 1.1 years (range, 1 month to 19 years). Preoperative mean total serum protein concentration was 5.0 +/- 0.2 g/dl, and mean albumin concentration was 2.1 +/- 0.2 g/dl, reflecting disease severity. The average daily steroid requirement at the time of urgent colectomy was 58.0 +/- 4.4 mg of prednisone (or intravenous equivalent). Primary IPAA included 18 "W" reservoirs, 1 "S" reservoir, and 1 "J" reservoir. RESULTS: Major surgical complications included mild pancreatitis (10 percent), anastomotic leak (5 percent), adrenal insufficiency (15 percent), an upper gastrointestinal bleed (5 percent), and small bowel obstruction (15 percent). There were no deaths, and no patients developed pelvic sepsis or required IPAA removal. At three and twelve months, 24-hr stool frequency averaged 7.3 +/- 0.4 and 4.9 +/- 0.3, respectively. Overall day and night continence was excellent and not different from patients who underwent elective IPAA procedures for ulcerative colitis. CONCLUSIONS: Improved options such as primary IPAA may be safely used in selected patients requiring urgent surgery for severe or fulminant ulcerative colitis. Medical management should be abbreviated when disease control cannot be promptly achieved.
One case of pouch ileitis after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis is described. Diagnosis was made by endoscopy, histology and electron microscopy. The most prominent feature was intense inflammation of the mucosa and submucosa, with atrophy of the villi, and colonic metaplasia, occurring before closure of the loop ileostomy. The patient improved after a course of metronidazole therapy, but ileostomy closure was postponed. It appears that the ileum mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis is highly prone to the development of inflammation and careful, regular follow-up is recommended.
Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a genetic disorder leading to the early development of numerous polyps of the entire colorectum. First polyps usually emerge in puberty and cause symptoms in the third and fourth decade of life when a malignant transformation of the adenomas via an adenoma-carcinoma-sequence has often already occurred. Extracolonic manifestations and age of onset of the disease show a wide range of variability rendering the establishment of unequivocal standards for the timing of diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic modalities difficult. We report the cases of two unrelated children who presented with severe symptomatic, pancolonic polyposis already at the age of 3. Molecular diagnostics revealed a 'new mutation' in one case, the other child had a family history for FAP. Rapid progression of the disease with anemia and slight growth retardation were the indications for prophylactic surgery at the age of 7. The operative procedure performed was restorative proctocolectomy followed by an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Both children developed small bowel adhesions that forced us to perform an early closure of the protective ileostomy 3 weeks postoperatively. The subsequent course was uneventful. The children are now thriving and lead a normal social life. After only 3 months their stool frequency ranged between 2 and 5 times daily.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Pouchitis is one of the most common and debilitating complications of a restorative proctocolectomy. We aimed to analyze the features of pouchitis after restorative proctocolecomy and to determine the risk factors related to its development. METHODS: A study was undertaken in 169 patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis between July 1989 and December 2003. Pouchitis was defined as change of bowel habit, change in stool consistency, hematochezia or abdominal pain, febrile sensation and/or low-grade fever improved by metronidazole or ciprofloxacin without evidence of infectious disease and sphincter damage. RESULTS: Among the 169 patients, patients with ulcerative colitis were 64, familial and attenuated adenomatous polyposis 44, Crohn's disease 2, and synchronous or hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer were 59 cases. Overall, pouchitis occurred in 15.9% of the patients. The incidence was 37.5% in ulcerative colitis, 1% in non-ulcerative colitis, and 50% in Crohn's disease. In ulcerative colitis group, most of the pouchitis (60.9%) occurred within 6 months after the operation and the remainder experienced the first attack within 1 year after operation. Three patients progressed to chronic pouchitis. There was no association between pouchitis rate and sex, history of smoking, steroid use, temporary ileostomy construction, involvement of appendix or proximal colon, and evidence of indeterminate colitis. Only age was significantly related to the occurrence of pouchitis. CONCLUSIONS: Pouchitis developed exclusively in ulcerative colitis than other disease groups. Pouchitis occurred most frequently within 6 months after the operation, therefore, it is important to investigate carefully during one year after the operation in patients with ulcerative colitis.