PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Snacks”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Snack facts.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Snacks and caries.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dental Caries↗
PubMed1988

Snacks and caries.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dental Caries↗
PubMed2006

Report card on school snack food policies among the United States' largest school districts in 2004-2005: room for improvement.

BACKGROUND: Federal nutritional guidelines apply to school foods provided through the national school lunch and breakfast programs, but few federal regulations apply to other foods and drinks sold in schools (labeled "competitive foods"), which are often high in calories, fat and sugar. Competitive food policies among school districts are increasingly viewed as an important modifiable factor in the school nutrition environment, particularly to address rising rates of childhood overweight. Congress passed legislation in 2004 requiring all school districts to develop a Wellness Policy that includes nutrition guidelines for competitive foods starting in 2006-2007. In addition, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) recently published recommendations for schools to address childhood obesity. METHODS: Representatives of school districts with the largest student enrollment in each state and D.C. (N = 51) were interviewed in October-November 2004 about each school district's nutrition policies on "competitive foods." District policies were examined and compared to the Institute of Medicine's recommendations for schools to address childhood obesity. Information about state competitive food policies was accessed via the Internet, and through state and district contacts. RESULTS: The 51 districts accounted for 5.9 million students, representing 11% of US students. Nineteen of the 51 districts (39%) had competitive food policies beyond state or federal requirements. The majority of these district policies (79%) were adopted since 2002. School district policies varied in scope and requirements. Ten districts (53%) set different standards by grade level. Most district policies had criteria for food and beverage content (74%) and prohibited the sale of soda in all schools (63%); fewer policies restricted portion size of foods (53%) or beverages (47%). Restrictions more often applied to vending machines (95%), cafeteria à la carte (79%), and student stores (79%) than fundraising activities (47%). Most of the policies did not address more comprehensive approaches to the school nutrition environment, such as nutrition education (32%) or advertising to students (26%), nor did they include guidelines on physical education (11%). In addition, few policies addressed monitoring (32%) or consequences for non-compliance (11%). No policy restricted foods sold for after-school fundraising or required monitoring physical health indicators (e.g. BMI). CONCLUSION: When compared to the Institute of Medicine's recommendations for schools' role in preventing obesity, none of the nutrition policies among each state's largest school district had addressed all the recommendations by 2004-2005. Nutritionists, nurses, pediatricians, parents, and others concerned about child health have an unprecedented opportunity to help shape and implement more comprehensive school district nutrition policies as part of the Congressional requirement for a "Wellness Policy" by 2006-2007.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1984

The cariogenic potential of several snack foods.

The use of the animal model and the Konig-Hofer program-feeding machine is a valuable tool in the research effort to identify the factors contributing to dental caries. As this methodology provides uniform host, microflora, and frequency components, the food is the variable being evaluated. The relative cariogenicity of food is dependent on variations in the composition, texture, solubility, retentiveness, and ability to stimulate saliva flow. The results of these experiments indicated the equal importance of all food-related parameters on dental caries formation. If the composition of foods was solely responsible for dental caries formation, all three of the granola bars should have had similar relative cariogenicity values. This was not true. Granola bar no. 3, which was crispier in texture and less moist, had a third the relative cariogenicity value of granola bars nos. 1 and 2. As reported by other dental researchers, the production of dental caries is food related, but not simplistic in nature. Dental caries is the outcome of complicated interactions, all of which are equally important in the progress of this disease.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Isn't this just bedtime snacking? The potential adverse effects of night-eating symptoms on treatment adherence and outcomes in patients with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Night-eating syndrome is characterized by excessive eating in the evening and nocturnal awakening with ingestion of food. Psychosocial variables and emotional triggers may be associated with these behaviors. In patients with diabetes, such behaviors may lead to glucose dysregulation and contribute to obesity and complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 714 tertiary care patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes, we determined the proportion of patients reporting eating >25% of their daily food intake after regular suppertime. We also screened patients for major depression, childhood maltreatment histories, nonsecure attachment styles, and emotional eating triggers. We examined whether patients reporting night-eating behaviors had greater psychosocial distress, higher HbA(1c) (A1C) levels, more obesity, and more diabetes complications compared with patients without night-eating behaviors. RESULTS: Night-eating behaviors were reported in 9.7% of patients. Compared with patients without night-eating behaviors, those with these behaviors were less adherent with diet, exercise, and glucose monitoring and more likely to be depressed, to report childhood maltreatment histories, to have nonsecure attachment styles, and to report eating in response to anger, sadness, loneliness, worry, and being upset. Controlling for age, sex, race, and major depression, patients with night-eating behaviors, compared with patients without night-eating behaviors, were more likely to be obese (odds ratio 2.6 [95% CI 1.5-4.5]), to have A1C values >7% (2.2 [1.1-4.1]) and to have two or more diabetes complications (2.6 [1.5-4.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Night-eating behaviors are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with diabetes. Use of clinical screening tools may help identify patients with night-eating behaviors.

Adolescent↗