SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Visual Fields”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 289 records · Page 16Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population.

PURPOSE: Visual field assessment is extremely important in glaucoma management, but interpretation is affected by the quality of the patient's performance. The authors have investigated the reliability of visual field performance by a randomly selected sample of the chronic glaucoma population at an urban tertiary care practice. METHODS: Patient reliability in Humphrey automated visual field testing was studied in 106 randomly selected chronic open-angle glaucoma patient charts, which provided 768 tests (mean, 7.2 +/- 4.8 fields; range, 2-18 fields). Reliability criteria were established as less than 20% fixation losses, less than 33% false-negative error, and less than 33% false-positive error, as recommended by Humphrey Instruments, Inc (San Leandro, CA). RESULTS: Patients performed reliably in 61% of right eye fields, 58% of left eye fields, and 59.5% overall. Of the 106 patients, only 35 (33%) were always reliable in both eyes, whereas 8 (7.5%) were always unreliable in both eyes. The most common cause of unreliability was fixation loss (39%), whereas false-positive error (5%) and false-negative error (9%) were less frequent. A more severely depressed mean deviation correlated significantly with poorer performance on the three reliability indices, with false-negative error having the greatest correlation, followed by fixation loss and false-positive error. Corrected pattern standard deviation correlated closely only with false-negative error. Prolonged test time also correlated with all three reliability indices. Age was a significant factor for fixation loss but not for false-negative or false-positive error. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that fewer than two thirds of the Humphrey visual fields were reliable with the authors' urban tertiary care population of patients with glaucoma. Relaxing the fixation loss criterion to less than 33% improved the rate of reliability to approximately 75%. The severity of glaucomatous visual field defects, test time, and age were identified as factors influencing the reliability of the Humphrey visual fields.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

[Study of visual field and vigabatrin treatment in children].

INTRODUCTION: Concentric visual field defects have been described in association with vigabatrin, a GABA mimetic antiepileptic agent. Few cases have been reported in children. METHODS: A systematic ophthalmological examination was performed in 14 children treated with vigabatrin for seizures. A manual kinetic perimetry test (Goldmann) was done in 11 cases. The ERG was recorded in the 3 cases where perimetry could not be done. RESULTS: All children were asymptomatic. The mean age was 9.6 years. The mean duration of vigabatrin treatment was 41 months. The visual field was abnormal when central and peripheral fields were constricted. A visual field defect was discovered in 6 cases: 4 were severe, 2 were mild. When vigabatrin treatment was stopped, 1 case became worse, 1 case was slightly better, and 1 case remained stationary. A disturbed ERG was found in 3 children (depressed b-wave, raised a/b ratio). CONCLUSION: The visual field defects discovered in children treated with vigabatrin are similar to those described in adults. The incidence and progression of visual field constriction in children with and after vigabatrin treatment are not yet well known. Children treated with vigabatrin should therefore have systematic and regular ophthalmological perimetry, and ERG examinations.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

The relationship between visual disability and visual field in patients with glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between visual disability and the remaining visual field in glaucoma patients. DESIGN: Prospective noncomparative survey. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-seven Japanese patients with glaucoma were examined. METHODS: Using a previously developed questionnaire, we assessed the relationship between visual disability indices and both the visual field examined using program 30-2 of the Humphrey Field Analyzer and visual acuity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pearson's correlation coefficients between visual disability indices and the 22 visual field and 2 visual acuity measurements were calculated. Multiple regression analysis with stepwise variable selection identified factors significantly contributing to visual disability. RESULTS: We identified a significant correlation between visual disability and both the visual field and visual acuity measurements collected. Of the factors examined, retinal sensitivity in the lower hemifield within 5 degrees of the fixation and visual acuity in the better eye significantly contributed to all the item and total disability indices (DIs), measurements of the degree of visual disability as evaluated by the questionnaire; visual acuity in the worse eye contributed to two of the seven item DIs, as well as the total DI. The R value for total DI (R = 0.87, P < 0.0001) indicated that approximately 76% of the visual disability could be explained by these factors. CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese glaucoma patients' visual disability is explained primarily by retinal sensitivity in the lower hemifield within 5 degrees of the fixation and visual acuity in the better eye and secondarily by visual acuity in the worse eye.

Adult↗

PubMed1988

[Hemianopic visual field defects--methods of study and localization problems].

In a survey of methods for determining hemianopic visual field defects, a distinction is made between gross visual field screening and actual visual field examination with kinetic and automatic static perimetry. These methods may be arranged according to increasing the concentration required as well as to ability to cooperate, as follows: hand-movement stimulation of shifts of gaze, finger-counting with repetition by the patient, brightness and color comparison among the respective halves and quadrants of the visual field, then kinetic perimetry with the Goldmann perimeter, and, most exacting of all, automated perimetry. The advantages of kinetic perimetry in cases of incipient bitemporal visual field defects are discussed. For visual field examination with automated static perimeters, test programs are chosen which have their test-point pattern shifted with respect to the principal meridian. The diagnostic situations in which visual field testing may and must not be limited to 30 degrees are presented in tabular form. Guidelines and criteria for localizing lesions have been developed, i.e., the vertical and horizontal limits of the major axes which pass through the fixation point and the temporal crescent. Consideration of the course of the nerve fibers in the retina and of the fact that exact separation between superior and inferior may only be found temporal to the foveola with corresponding nasal defects enables horizontally limited visual field defects originating within the eye to be distinguished clearly from those originating in the visual cortex. Vertical limits due to semidecussation at the chiasma permit a differentiation between prechiasmic and postchiasmic lesions. In homonymous defects, consideration of further simple anatomic features of the visual pathway, namely the knee of Wilbrand and that portion of the optic radiation which extends anteriorly to the temporal lobes and which represents the inferior retinal halves with characteristic defects, also enables lesions in the visual pathway to be localized more accurately.

Brain Mapping↗

PubMed2000

Effect of infusion air pressure on visual field defects after macular hole surgery.

PURPOSE: A defect in the visual field is one of the serious complications of macular hole surgery. We investigated the relationship between the occurrence of visual field defect and the location of infusion cannula and air pressure during fluid-air exchange. METHODS: We studied 100 eyes from 90 patients with macular holes. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative visual field testing. Vitreous surgery was performed in a standard three-port fashion, with surgically induced posterior vitreous detachment, fluid-air exchange, and sulfur hexafluoride gas injection. We analyzed differences in surgical methods in three groups. In group A, the infusion cannula was placed inferotemporally, and the air pressure was set at 50 mm Hg. In group B, the infusion cannula was placed inferonasally, and the air pressure was set at 50 mm Hg. In group C, the infusion cannula was placed inferotemporally, and the air pressure was set at 30 mm Hg. RESULTS: Eighteen eyes (18%) showed visual field defects after vitrectomy. The defect was always located contralateral to the infusion cannula. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of visual field defects in groups A and B. Decreased air pressure reduced the occurrence of visual field defects significantly (24% in group A versus 4% in group C, P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: The location of the visual field defect correlated with the location of the infusion cannula. The incidence of this visual field defect was influenced strongly by the infusion air pressure. The visual field defect may be caused by the mechanical damage of air infusion.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

[Visual field defects due to antiepileptic drugs].

Within the last years several reports concerning visual field defects, associated with antiepileptic drugs, have been published. In addition to antiepileptic drugs several other causes (e.g. retinopathy or chloroquine, phenothiazine etc.) may induce visual field disturbances. Visual field defects have been observed during vigabatrine, tiagabine, gabapentine, diazepam, phenytoine, and carbamazepine treatment. In 13 to 46% visual field defects are reported to be linked with epilepsies. In addition to general population based studies concerning visual field defects and prospective etiological studies in epilepsies, preclinical studies for the examination of the pathomechanism of visual field defects are necessary.

Acetates↗

PubMed2002

The representation of the visual field in three extrastriate areas of the ferret (Mustela putorius) and the relationship of retinotopy and field boundaries to callosal connectivity.

We describe representations of the visual field in areas 18, 19 and 21 of the ferret using standard microelectrode mapping techniques. In all areas the azimuths are represented as islands of peripheral visual field surrounded by central visual field representation. The zero meridian was found at the 17/18 and 19/21 borders; at the 18/19 and anterior border of 21 the relative periphery of the visual field was found. In areas 18 and 19, elevations are represented in a smooth medio-lateral progression from lower to upper visual field. In several cases the elevations in area 21 evidenced a similar medio-lateral progression; however, in others the elevations exhibited a split representation of the horizontal meridian. Anatomically determined callosal connections coincided with the representation of azimuths near the zero meridian. Medio-lateral bands of callosal connectivity that straddle the 17/18 and 19/21 borders are connected by bridges of callosally projecting cells. Acallosal cortical islands corresponded to the peripheral visual field and were found straddling the 18/19 border and the anterior border of area 21. The results are discussed in relation to callosal connectivity and retinotopy in extrastriate visual cortex and to proposed homologies of carnivore and primate visual cortex.

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Patterns of visual field progression in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to determine whether distinct patterns of visual field progression are present in patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and to evaluate the correlation between these patterns, if present, and different genetic subtypes of RP. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of patterns of visual field progression in RP was performed. PARTICIPANTS: Visual fields of 162 patients with RP, including 55 with type 2 Usher syndrome, who had at least 3 Goldmann visual field examinations during a period of at least 3 years were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Goldmann visual fields. RESULTS: Visual fields of 86 patients could be classified into one of three specific patterns of visual field progression. Pattern I included those patients with a progressive concentric loss of visual fields; pattern II included those with visual field loss that began superiorly and subsequently developed an arcuate scotoma that progressed either from the nasal (IIA) or the temporal (IIB and IIC) side; and pattern III included patients whose visual field loss was characterized initially by a complete or incomplete midperipheral "ring scotoma" that broke through into the periphery. The end stage of all these patterns was a residual central visual field, sometimes also associated with a small peripheral island. In 53 of the 162 patients, the pattern of visual field loss could not be categorized because of an advanced stage of field loss at the time of the initial examination. CONCLUSIONS: Distinctive patterns of visual field progression can be observed in patients with retinitis pigmentosa and type 2 Usher syndrome. There were no intrafamilial variations in the pattern of visual field loss in our data on 24 patients from 11 families. Within certain genetic subtypes, there was a predilection for a preponderance of a specific pattern of visual field progression. Future studies may be able to correlate these patterns of visual field loss with different genetic mutations. A greater understanding as to why certain patterns of field loss exist could potentially provide greater insight into the various pathogenetic mechanism(s) by which photoreceptor cells degenerate in this group of patients.

Deafness↗

PubMed2002

Visual field assessment and the Austroads driving standard.

PURPOSE: To compare the conventional (Humphrey 24-2) automated visual field testing with the Goldmann standard visual field test for driving, and to predict how many patients with glaucoma may not meet the Australian driving standard with respect to visual fields. METHODS: Four patients (retinitis pigmentosa, glaucoma or vigabatrin treatment) with marked visual field defects as determined by uniocular static computerized perimetry (conventional testing) were re-evaluated with binocular kinetic Goldmann IV4e target field test (Australian driving standard). A series of 48 consecutive patients seen by the Glaucoma Inheritance Study in Tasmania were assessed with both static computerized perimetry and the Goldmann IV4e target test. RESULTS: The four patients with severe visual field defects (on computerized perimetry) were found to meet the driving standard on the binocular Goldmann IV4e target test. On computerized perimetry, 15 of 48 patients from the Glaucoma Inheritance Study in Tasmania were found to have visual field defects of sufficient severity that they may not meet the driving standard. However, only five of these patients failed the driving standard for visual fields, two of whom were still driving. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe field defects on conventional uniocular automated perimetry may still meet the Goldmann standard visual field test for driving. Approximately 30% of glaucoma patients would have visual field loss shown on Humphrey 24-2 test of a severity that requires further testing to determine if they meet the driving standard. Ten per cent of glaucoma patients tested did not meet the driving standard for visual fields.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Human amblyopia: structure of the visual field.

Kittens raised with different kinds of abnormal early visual experience (monocular and binocular deprivation, convergent strabismus, eye rotation, asymmetric alternating occlusion, early callosal split) show systematic deficits in the nasal visual field of the affected eye. To test whether abnormal visual experience produces similar deficits in the human visual system, we measured the monocular visual field of humans with subnormal binocular vision (strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes, strabismics with alternating fixation). Eight amblyopes were tested with a computer-assisted static perimetry (Octopus 2000). Twenty other subjects were tested with kinetic perimetry (Goldmann 940), 11 subjects with static perimetry (Goldmann 940). In some of these subjects, we measured the latency of saccades and the accuracy of visually guided pointing toward stimuli presented in the peripheral visual field. Both strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes frequently showed deficits of visual sensitivity in the central part of the visual field, but no systematic deficits in the peripheral field of the amblyopic eyes. Strabismic alternators had practically equal fields in the two eyes. Neither saccadic latency nor pointing accuracy showed a systematic impairment in the nasal visual field. The discrepancy between the field losses in strabismic humans and in cats raised with a surgically induced squint cannot be due to methodological differences, but rather to anatomical differences, or to the different origin of strabismus in the two species.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision.

PURPOSE: To determine which measures of the binocular visual field correlate best with the patient's assessment of vision. METHODS: Esterman binocular visual field testing and four other binocular visual field tests (designated peripheral 20 dB [p20], peripheral 22 dB [p22], central 24 dB [c24] and central 26 dB [c26]) were performed in 101 patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma. Scores from these five tests, as well as binocular visual field scores calculated from monocular testing (best-location summation and probability summation), were correlated with performance on the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ)-25 and Short-Form (SF)-36 quality of life instruments, as well as with the linear rating scale utility test. RESULTS: The mean percentage of correct responses was 87%, 69%, 59%, 78%, and 71% for the Esterman, p20, p22, c24, and c26 tests, respectively. The distribution of scores was much broader for the p20 and p22 tests than for the Esterman test. The mean decibels for the binocular visual fields calculated from the monocular visual fields were 21.5 +/- 7.7 dB for the best-location algorithm and 25.1 +/- 6.7 dB for the probability-summation algorithm. The binocular visual field score calculated with the best-location algorithm correlated better with the overall, general vision, distance activities, and peripheral vision domains of theVFQ-25 (partial correlation coefficients of 0.48, 0.48, 0.49, and 0.51, respectively) than did the probability-summation algorithm and all five binocular visual field tests. The best-location algorithm also had the strongest correlation with the linear rating scale utility test (partial correlation coefficient, 0.40). CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of clinic-based patients with glaucoma or suspected glaucoma, a global score derived from a combination of two monocular fields correlated better with patient assessment of vision than did the Esterman and four novel binocular visual field tests.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Sudden visual field constriction associated with optic disc drusen.

We report two patients with optic disc drusen who suffered sudden, concentric constriction of the visual field. Visual acuity remained normal. The involved discs showed no swelling, hemorrhage, or other evidence of anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. We are unable to explain the mechanism or the pattern of visual field loss in these unusual cases.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Unsupervised machine learning with independent component analysis to identify areas of progression in glaucomatous visual fields.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a variational Bayesian independent component analysis mixture model (vB-ICA-mm), a form of unsupervised machine learning, can be used to identify and quantify areas of progression in standard automated perimetry fields. METHODS: In an earlier study, it was shown that a model using vB-ICA-mm can separate normal fields from fields with six different patterns of visual field loss related to glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) along maximally independent axes. In the present study, an independent group of 191 patient eyes (66 with ocular hypertension (OHT), 12 with suspected glaucoma by field, 61 with suspected glaucoma by disc, and 52 with glaucoma) with five or more standard visual fields under observation for a mean of 6.24 +/- 2.65 years and 8.11 +/- 2.42 visual fields were evaluated with the vB-ICA-mm. In addition, eyes with progressive GON (PGON) were identified (n = 39). Each participant had a series of fields tested, with each field entered independently and placed along the axes of the previously developed model. This allowed change in one pattern of visual field defect (along one axis) to be assessed relative to results other areas of that same field (no change along other axes). Progression was based on a slope falling outside the 5th and the 95th percentile limits of all slopes, with at least two axes not showing such a deviation in a given individual's series of fields. Fields were also scored using Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) and the Early Manifest Glaucoma Treatment Trial (EMGT) criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-two of 191 eyes progressed on vB-ICA-mm by this definition. Of the 32, 22 had field loss at baseline, 7 had only GON, 3 were OHTs and 12 were from the 39 eyes (31%) with PGON. The vB-ICA-mm identified a higher percentage of progressing eyes in each diagnostic category than did AGIS or and the EMGT. CONCLUSIONS: The vB-ICA-mm can quantitatively identify progression in eyes with glaucoma by evaluating change in one or more patterns of the visual field loss while other areas or patterns remain stable. This may enable each eye to contribute to the determination of whether change is caused by true progression or by variability.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

Intraocular pressure and the rate of visual field loss in chronic open-angle glaucoma.

We measured the rate of change of visual field threshold values over time (mean follow-up, 44.9 +/- 17.4 months) by trend analysis in 40 eyes of 40 patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Twenty-eight eyes had stable visual fields, and two eyes had significant visual field improvement. Ten eyes had significant visual field deterioration and showed a correlation between indices of intraocular pressure (standard error of the mean, P = .02; standard deviation, P = .04; and range, P = .05) and the rate of visual field loss in the superonasal region of the visual field, such that the greater the variation of intraocular pressure the greater the rate of loss. The group losing visual fields had a higher mean visual field threshold value and significantly less optic disk pallor and cupping at the start of the study than the stable visual field group. Thus, a significant rate of visual field loss occurred at an earlier stage of the disease and showed a correlation with intraocular pressure in this stage.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Analysis of progressive change in automated visual fields in glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To detect and estimate the rate of progression of visual field loss in subjects with glaucoma who undergo long-term automated perimetric visual field testing. METHODS: Automated visual field data were obtained for subjects with glaucomatous visual field loss and a minimum of seven threshold field tests over at least 4.5 years. Univariate linear regression was performed with respect to mean deviation (MD), corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD), mean thresholds of clusters corresponding to the Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT), and thresholds of 52 individual test locations. Subjects were classified as progressive or stable (unchanged or improved) based on the slope and statistical significance of these parameters. Adjusted P values were used to maintain the overall type 1 error at 5%. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one subjects with a mean follow-up period of 7.1 years (range, 4.5 to 10.5 years) and a mean number of visual field tests of 9.5 (range, 7 to 16) were included. Twenty-four subjects (12.6%) showed progression in MD (mean slope [95% confidence interval], -1.26 [-1.50, -1.01] dB/year), and 27 (14.1%) showed progression in CPSD (mean slope [95% confidence interval], 0.71 [0.58, 0.84] dB/year). Thirty-five subjects (18.3%) had > or = 1 progressive GHT cluster. The mean slope in progressive clusters ranged from -1.51 [-1.82, -1.20] to -2.84 [-3.39, -2.29] dB/year. Thirty-six subjects (18.8%) had > or = 1 progressive individual test locations. Fifty-two subjects (27.2%) were classified as progressive based on progression of CPSD, > or = 1 cluster and/or > or = 1 point. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer than 1 in 3 subjects progressed by any one of the criteria for progression over an average of 7.1 years. Rates of progression that could be statistically confirmed were in the range of approximately 1 to 5 dB/year, depending on the number of fields, the variability over time, and the parameter assessed (global indices, GHT clusters, or individual points). No correlation between initial visual field status and the rate of progression was found. A minimum of approximately 5 years of follow-up with annual perimetry would be required to detect significant changes in the visual field by linear regression.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Reducing noise in suspected glaucomatous visual fields by using a new spatial filter.

Visual field testing with automated perimetry is hampered by the amount of noise present in the readings. Here, we derive a physiologically accurate spatial filter to be applied to the data after patient examination. The filter was tested by a Virtual Eye computer simulation. By simulating series of stable fields it was shown that specificity of determining visual field changes was improved; while simulating progressing fields (based on a map of the optic nerve head) it was shown that sensitivity was also improved. The filter appears to reduce the noise in glaucomatous visual field data and may be clinically useful.

Computer Simulation↗

PubMed2006

Standardized visual field assessment for patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy.

PURPOSE: To adapt a standardized technique for assessment of visual fields to the study of patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy and to describe visual field patterns and changes over time for affected individuals. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients with a diagnosis of birdshot chorioretinopathy who had undergone at least two automated visual field studies. A masked evaluation of each visual field was performed using standardized criteria. Subjective symptoms and visual acuity measurements were compared to visual field data from the same examination dates. Serial visual field studies were evaluated for changes in the findings over time. RESULTS: Six patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 104 visual field studies (ranging from 2-19 studies per eye) were evaluated. Visual field abnormalities occurred in all tested eyes and were observed even in eyes with a Snellen visual acuity of 20/15. Discordant patterns were observed in the two eyes of some individual patients. On serial testing, multiple patterns of visual field abnormality were observed in the same eye over time. CONCLUSIONS: A standardized protocol for systematic evaluation of visual field measurements can be used to characterize disturbances of vision in patients with birdshot chorioretinopathy. Abnormalities of visual fields may occur even when central visual acuity is preserved.

Chorioretinitis↗

PubMed1997

Visual field defects in patients with pituitary adenomas.

BACKGROUND: The most common objective manifestations of pituitary adenoma are visual, including impairment of a visual field and loss of acuity. The characteristic visual field defect caused by pituitary adenomas with suprasellar extension is bitemporal hemianopsia. The present study was undertaken to determine the relationship between a visual field defect and the chiasma compression caused by pituitary adenomas. METHODS: Between January 1994 and December 1996 within the Department of Neurosurgery at the Neurological Institute of Veterans General Hospital-Taipei, 70 patients with pituitary adenoma were selected. Their medical records and radiological films were reviewed. The qualified visual field scores were compared with the chiasma compression levels measured from computed tomography, sagittal and coronal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. The relationships of pathological diagnosis as well as history of prior operations with visual field defect score were also evaluated. RESULTS: patients with a pathological diagnosis of a non-functional pituitary adenoma or with a history of prior operation for the pituitary adenoma had the more severe visual field defect. The chiasma compression level, no matter measured from computed tomography, sagittal MR or coronal MR imaging, was correlated significantly with the visual field defect. The correlation coefficient was 0.764 from computed tomography, 0.688 from sagittal MR imaging, and 0.717 from coronal MR imaging. The visual field defect was present mostly when the chiasma compression exceeded a certain level when measured from computed tomography, sagittal MR and coronal MR imaging. On the other hand, variation in chiasma type had little effect on the appearance and degree of a visual field defect. CONCLUSIONS: There was a linear correlation between a visual field defect and the chiasma compression no matter whether measured from computed tomography or from MR imaging. The visual field defect occurred mostly when the chiasma compression exceeded a certain level. A more severe visual field defect appeared in patients with nonfunctional pituitary adenoma or those with a prior operation history for the pituitary adenoma.

Adenoma↗