SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Chlorhexidine”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

PubMed1979

Tooth stain during 2 years' use of chlorhexidine- and fluoride-containing dentifrices.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of fluoride upon the stain-inducing capacity of chlorhexidine. Ninety-one children, 13 years of age, volunteered for the experiment. Three test dentifrices were used, containing 0.1% NaF, 0.1% NaF + 2% chlorhexidine, and 2% chlorhexidine respectively. The experiment was carried out as a double-blind test, and the degree of staining was recorded after 1 and 2 years. Four methods were used for stain scoring. The results after 1 year showed that chlorhexidine induced less stain when applied together with fluoride than when applied alone. After 2 years this difference disappeared, indicating that fluoride only retarded chlorhexidine-induced staining of teeth.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1988

Interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium monofluorophosphate in vitro.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the compatibility of chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium monofluorophosphate since these agents are potential ingredients in future products in preventive dentistry. Varying combinations of chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium monofluorophosphate in water, covering the possible ranges of clinically relevant concentrations of both compounds, were made, incubated for 24 h and observed for precipitation of insoluble salts. The mixtures were analyzed for presence of free chlorhexidine and monofluorophosphate after incubation. The results showed that chlorhexidine digluconate and sodium monofluorophosphate are not compatible in clinically relevant concentrations. A chlorhexidine-monofluorophosphate salt of low solubility in water is presumably formed.

Chemical Phenomena↗

PubMed1991

Combined effects of Zn(2+)-chlorhexidine and Zn(2+)-cetylpyridinium chloride on caries incidence in partially desalivated rats.

The effects of Zn2+ combined with either chlorhexidine or cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) on caries incidence in partially desalivated rats were investigated. Seven groups of 12 animals each received topical applications for 20 s with a saturated swab (0.2 ml) of the following aqueous solutions twice daily on weekdays (10 a.m. and 3 p.m.) and once daily during weekends (12 a.m.) for 5 wk: deionized water (placebo); 40 mM zinc acetate; 2.2 mM chlorhexidine diacetate; 4.4 mM CPC; 40 mM zinc acetate and 2.2 mM chlorhexidine diacetate; 40 mM zinc acetate and 4.4 mM CPC; and 20 mM NaF (positive control). Coronal caries was scored by the method of Keyes. All treatments except CPC alone resulted in significantly (P less than 0.05, ANOVA) less smooth-surface caries than did the placebo. NaF treatment resulted in significantly less smooth-surface caries than did Zn2+, chlorhexidine, CPC, and Zn(2+)-CPC. The inclusion of zinc ions did not significantly increase the caries-inhibitory efficacy of chlorhexidine (CH). The combination of Zn(2+)-CPC decreased smooth-surface scores significantly more than did CPC alone. Significant differences in sulcal-surface caries were not observed among the groups. Zn(2+)-CPC suppressed the Streptococcus sobrinus counts significantly more than did the separate agents. Animals treated with Zn(2+)-CH harbored the lowest populations of S. sobrinus.

Acetates↗

PubMed1991

Effects of a chlorhexidine-fluoride-strontium rinsing program on caries, gingivitis and some salivary bacteria among Finnish schoolchildren.

In order to find out if it is possible to prevent caries and gingivitis by periodical use of chlorhexidine-fluoride mouthrinses with or without strontium, and to find out what effects they have on salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli counts, a total of 243 schoolchildren aged 11 yr with high DMFS scores were randomly divided into four groups. One group (C) served as a basic control. Subjects in the second group (CXF) rinsed their mouths twice a day every third week with a rinsing solution containing 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate and 0.04% NaF. In the third group (CXFS) the rinsing solution contained 500 ppm Sr during the first and second year and 15 ppm during the last 6 months, in addition to chlorhexidine and fluoride. In the fourth group (CX) the solution contained only 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate. All the rinsing solutions had pH 5.8 buffered with succinic acid-NaOH buffer. After 2 yr and 9 months, the mean DMFS (SD) increments in the C, CXF, CXFS, and CX groups were 3.8 (5.7), 2.5 (3.2), 3.5 (4.8), and 3.4 (5.5), respectively. The percentage of subjects with bleeding gingival units had decreased from initial to final values as follows: C, 81-38; CXF, 88-42; CXFS, 89-56; CX, 89-37. The number of lactobacilli and mutans streptococci in saliva remained virtually unchanged throughout the study. For caries increment and gingival bleeding, the differences between groups were not statistically significant. The chlorhexidine-fluoride combination tended to prevent caries, but the effect on gingival bleeding and salivary counts of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli was negligible.

Bacteria↗

PubMed1994

Efficacy of chlorhexidine solution with fluoride varnishing in preventing enamel softening by Streptococcus mutans in an artificial mouth.

For study of the enamel-protective effect of chlorhexidine-fluoride applications, the labial surfaces of pieces of bovine incisors were treated with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution, with Duraphat fluoride varnish, or with both of the above agents, while one group was treated with distilled water and one was left as an untreated control. Furthermore, a placebo varnish was used in the chlorhexidine- and distilled-water-treated groups; all the varnishes were removed after 24 h. The enamel slabs were mounted pairwise in an artificial mouth to form approximal contacts. The teeth were continuously rinsed with a common pool of artificial saliva to which was added 3% sucrose, and which was infected on the first day with Streptococcus mutans, "Ingbritt". The saliva was renewed daily and the incubation at 37 degrees C lasted for 10 days. The appreciable softening found in the distilled-water- and placebo-varnish-treated group tended to be prevented by the chlorhexidine and even more by the fluoride treatment, while the chlorhexidine-fluoride treatment prevented enamel softening completely. The saliva, infected only on the first day, and renewed daily, tended to become more acidified toward the end of the experimental period, obviously because the fermenting organisms had infected the surfaces of the model and formed plaque-like coatings on the enamel.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Chlorhexidine with an Anti Discoloration System. A comparative study.

UNLABELLED: Correct oral hygiene is believed to be the basis of primary and secondary prevention. Sometimes, using a toothbrush or other mechanical instruments for oral hygiene may be difficult and it may become necessary to use an antiseptic. Chlorhexidine is an essential component in many available preparations on sale, because of its marked antiseptic qualities. One of the most frequent side-effects is the appearance of stains on the teeth and mucous membranes, which particularly disturbs the patient. A new mouthwash containing chlorhexidine has recently become available, besides maintaining its antiseptic qualities, also avoids the side-effect of staining. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to check the capacity of the new mouthwash, which contains chlorhexidine and Anti Discoloration System (ADS), not only to prevent plaque formation like the other mouthwashes containing chlorhexidine but also to avoid staining that is one of the most frequent side-effects. STUDY DESIGN: The comparative study was carried out on a sample of 15 patients treated with two mouthwashes both containing 0.2% chlorhexidine, but different in that the first does not contain ADS, which is instead present in the second, a new product. The results obtained show that in the 15 patients treated, there is no statistically significant difference in the ability of the mouthwash to prevent bacterial plaque, however evidence of the stain was much less with the new mouthwash.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Prevention of neonatal infections by vaginal chlorhexidine disinfection during labour.

Comparison of two different methods of vaginal disinfection was made with regard to prevention of neonatal infections. In method I, an antepartum vaginal douche with a chlorhexidine solution was used; method II involved the use of chlorhexidine gluconate obstetrical gel during vaginal exploration. We studied 2853 normal deliveries from a total number of 3236 deliveries: 1467 deliveries were allocated randomly to receive a vaginal douche whereas 1386 underwent vaginal exploration using chlorhexidine gel. A total of 203 neonates were transferred to the neonatal unit (120 males and 83 females): 101 belonged to the group where the mothers were subjected to method I, whereas in 102 method II had been used. Within 48 h postpartum 30 neonates from the method I group and 34 neonates from the method II group received systemic antibiotics. There was a tendency towards a higher proportion of full-term neonates with verified septicaemia in the method II group (6 versus 2), whereas the numbers of probable infections were 8 versus 12. The corresponding total numbers in preterm infants were 3 and 2, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that the use of chlorhexidine douche compared with vaginal exploration with chlorhexidine gel provides no additional advantages.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A review of chlorhexidine and its use in special populations.

The purpose of this paper is to review the mechanism of the action, safety, and side-effects of chlorhexidine, and to provide guidelines for its use in special populations. Chlorhexidine has been used orally since 1959, primarily for the control of dental plaque. Chlorhexidine is a safe material, with low toxicity potential when used correctly. The most conspicuous side-effects are the development of yellow-brown stains on the teeth, tongue, and at the margins of anterior restorations, and an alteration in taste sensation. The use of chlorhexidine is indicated in developmentally disabled, medically compromised patients, and in dependent elderly populations, since these groups are often physically unable to remove plaque by mechanical means. Clinicians should not prescribe chlorhexidine indiscriminately for all patients, however, until analyzing its efficacy, safety, and side-effects.

Aged↗

PubMed1981

The mechanism of interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate).

The extent of the interaction between chlorhexidine digluconate and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate), (PHEMA), is independent of temperature between 22-50 degrees C which is consistent with an ion-ion interaction mechanism. Different contact lens materials exhibit different affinities for chlorhexidine digluconate, the extent of uptake correlating in rank order with the number of free carboxylic acid sites in the polymers. Esterification of the carboxyl groups with diazomethane, resulted in a reduction in the affinity of the treated polymers for chlorhexidine to a near basal level. The uptake of chlorhexidine in soaking solution experiments involving lenses made from PHEMA and the more ionic material, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-isobutyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid), was consistent with their carboxylate content. However, the fraction of bound disinfectant released was lower from the terpolymer, suggesting there are differences in bonding strengths between chlorhexidine and different contact lens hydrogels.

Adsorption↗

PubMed2002

Cloning of a cation efflux pump gene associated with chlorhexidine resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Expression libraries of a chlorhexidine-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strain were constructed and transformed into Escherichia coli XLOLR. Twenty chlorhexidine-resistant transformants were obtained after selection. All clones contained a novel 903-nucleotide locus. Its sequences were compatible with a cation efflux pump, and the locus was thus designated as cepA. Retransformation using cepA-containing plasmids conferred chlorhexidine resistance to both XLOLR and a chlorhexidine-sensitive K. pneumoniae strain. Therefore, CepA is associated with chlorhexidine resistance and may act as a cation efflux pump.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed1979

Comparative study on the antimicrobial effect of 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate and 70% isopropyl alcohol on the normal flora of hands.

A gloved-hand wash method was used to compare the antimicrobial effect of chlorhexidine gluconate alcohol emollient hand wash (HIBISTAT) with that of 70% isopropyl alcohol on the normal flora of the hands (81 subjects) under conditions designed to mimic use by surgeons. Results of the immediate postwash effects on the bacterial counts for all 3 tests days showed that chlorhexidine significantly reduced the normal flora of the hands. When compared with the base line bacterial counts, there was 85, 96, and 98% reduction with chlorhexidine treatment and 84, 93, and 90% reduction with alcohol treatment on days 1,2, and 5, respectively. The difference between chlorhexidine and alcohol treatments was not statistically significant on days 1 and 2, but was significant on day 5 (P less than 0.01). For delayed postwash bacterial counts (for persistent antimicrobial effects), the overall log means were 4.9943 and 5.4684 for chlorhexidine and alcohol treatments, respectively. The difference between the two treatments was significant (P less than 0.01). After the chlorhexidien treatment, there was no significant growth of bacteria over a period of 6 h when compared with the base line bacterial counts.

1-Propanol↗

PubMed1981

Percutaneous absorption of chlorhexidine in neonatal cord care.

The percutaneous absorption of chlorhexidine during its routine use in topical antiseptic preparations used in umbilical cord care was investigated by determining plasma chlorhexidine concentrations at ages 5 and 9 days. These showed that percutaneous absorption of chlorhexidine occurred in preterm neonates treated with a 1% solution of chlorhexidine in ethanol, but not in term infants similarly treated, or in preterm infants treated only with a dusting powder containing 1% chlorhexidine and 3% zinc oxide.

Chlorhexidine↗

PubMed1993

Effect of single and repeated application of chlorhexidine varnish on mutans streptococci in plaque from fissures of premolar and molar teeth.

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of one and two applications of 40% chlorhexidine varnish on the numbers of mutants streptococci in human dental fissure plaques from molar and premolar teeth. Twenty-nine subjects (aged 20-30 years) participated in the study and were randomly assigned to one of three groups. In each subject two fissures with high levels of mutants streptococci were selected. The fissures in group 1 (control group) were treated with placebo varnish containing no chlorhexidine. Fissures in group 2 received a single application of 40% chlorhexidine varnish, whereas fissures in group 3 received an additional chlorhexidine varnish application 1 week after the first application. Fissure plaque samples were taken prior to the first application of chlorhexidine varnish and subsequently 1, 2, and 4 months thereafter. Compared with the fissures in the control group, the suppression of mutans streptococci was significant in plaques from group 2 for up to 2 months and in plaques from group 3 for up to 4 months after application. Mutans streptococci were suppressed more strongly in premolar than in molar teeth and more strongly and for a longer period of time in fissures of premolar teeth treated twice than in fissures of premolars treated once.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1994

Effect of a 3-year professional flossing program with chlorhexidine gel on approximal caries and cost of treatment in preschool children.

The aim was to evaluate the effect of chlorhexidine gel treatment on the incidence of approximal caries in preschool children. One hundred and seventeen 4-year-olds, divided into two groups, participated: (1) chlorhexidine gel group (n = 59), and (2) placebo gel group (n = 58). Group 1 was treated 4 times a year with a 1% chlorhexdine gel and group 2 with a placebo gel. Approximately 0.7 ml of gel was applied interdentally by means of a flat dental floss. A control group (group 3), which did not receive any flossing or gel treatment, was also included in the study (n = 116). After 3 years, i.e. when the children were 7 years old, the mean incidence of caries on approximal surfaces (defs), including both enamel and dentin lesions, was 2.59 in the chlorhexidine gel, 4.53 in the placebo gel and 4.20 in the control group (group 1 vs. 2 and group 1 vs. 3: p < 0.01). Mean number of approximal fillings at the end of the study, i.e. when the children were 7 years old, was 0.33 in the chlorhexidine gel, 1.04 in the placebo gel and 0.80 in the control group (group 1 vs. 2: p < 0.01; group 1 vs. 3: p < 0.05). The progression of approximal caries lesions, diagnosed on bitewing radiographs from the age of 5 to 7, was slower in the chlorhexidine than in the placebo gel group (the control group was not evaluated in this respect). A cost analysis, based on the total treatment time in minutes, showed a small gain for the flossing program.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Child↗

PubMed1996

Protection of bovine enamel and dentine by chlorhexidine and fluoride varnishes in a bacterial demineralization model.

In an in vitro demineralization model, the protective effect of two chlorhexidine varnishes, Cervitec (1% w/w chlorhexidine diacetate and 1% w/w thymol) and EC40 (40% w/w chlorhexidine diacetate), was compared with that of Fluor Protector, a varnish containing 0.1% w/w F. The demineralization model comprised an acidogenic Streptococcus mutans suspension in agarose placed on enamel or dentine specimens. The experiments extended over three serial 22-hour demineralization periods with fresh S. mutans suspensions for each period. To determine whether the varnishes released enough demineralization-inhibiting compounds, approximately 10 microliters of the varnishes was applied adjacent to the enamel and dentine specimens just before the first application of the S. mutans suspensions and left during the serial experiments (release study). In a separate series of experiments, the effect of the pretreatment of the enamal and dentine specimens with the various varnishes was tested (pretreatment study). In the release study the protective effect for enamel decreased in the order: EC40 = Fluor Protector >> Cervitec = no treatment. For dentine this order was: EC40 >> Fluor Protector = Cervitec > no treatment. In the pretreatment study, the enamel specimens were best protected by Fluor Protector (Fluor Protector >> Cervitec = EC40 > no treatment), while the dentine specimens were best protected by the chlorhexidine treatments (Cervitec = EC40 > Fluor Protector > no treatment). A 1:1 mixture of Cervitec and Fluor Protector was as effective as the most effective component alone. It is concluded that a varnish containing both fluoride and chlorhexidine may be useful, since it could give optimal protection to both enamel and dentine.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Effects of fluoride and chlorhexidine on the microflora of dental root surfaces and progression of root-surface caries.

The effects of fluoride and chlorhexidine varnishes on the microflora of dental root surfaces and on the progression of root-surface caries were studied. Forty-four patients, surgically treated for advanced periodontal disease, were distributed at random among three groups. All patients received a standardized preventive treatment. Furthermore, the dentition of the patients in the two experimental groups was treated, at three-month intervals, with chlorhexidine and fluoride varnish, respectively. Patients in the control group received no additional treatment. In the experimental groups, plaque samples were collected from selected sound and carious root surfaces at baseline and at three, six, and nine months after the onset of the study. The presence of root-surface caries was scored at baseline and after one year. In addition, the texture, depth, and color of the root-surface lesions were monitored. Mutans streptococci on root surfaces were suppressed significantly (p less than 0.05) during the whole experimental period in the chlorhexidine varnish group, but not in the fluoride varnish group. A non-significant increase in the number of Actinomyces viscosus/naeslundii was noted after treatment with chlorhexidine and fluoride varnish. The increase in the number of decayed and filled root surfaces after one year was significantly lower in the experimental groups than in the control group. After treatment with chlorhexidine varnish, significantly more initial root-surface lesions had hardened than in the other groups.

Actinomyces↗

PubMed1993

Reduction of proteolytic degradation by chlorhexidine.

The present investigation was designed to evaluate the effect of the antimicrobial agent chlorhexidine on proteolytic degradation. Chlorhexidine, at a final concentration of 0.01%, significantly (p = 0.05) affected the degradation of the general chromogenic substrate azocoll by both commercial proteases and cell-bound bacterial proteases. Reduction of proteolytic degradation was observed following pre-treatment of either azocoll or bacterial cells with chlorhexidine. Chlorhexidine was also found to prevent degradation of type I collagen by Porphyromonas gingivalis cells. The mechanism of inhibition of proteolytic degradation appears to be related to an electrostatic chlorhexidine-protein interaction.

Azo Compounds↗

PubMed1993

Long-term effects of Meridol and chlorhexidine mouthrinses on plaque, gingivitis, staining, and bacterial vitality.

The aim of the present study was to compare the effect on plaque growth and gingival response of Meridol, an amine/stannous fluoride solution, during a three-month investigation, with those of a placebo preparation as a negative control and a chlorhexidine solution as a positive control, in a double-blind study. After having their teeth professionally cleaned, 36 volunteers continued their usual oral hygiene for a period of two weeks. Their teeth were then polished again (month 0) after which they rinsed twice daily (morning and evening) with one of the three mouthrinses in addition to their habitual toothcleaning. After three months of rinsing, plaque indices remained lowest in the chlorhexidine group, although the subjects using Meridol had indices significantly lower than those of individuals rinsing with the placebo solution. The gingival index scores in the Meridol group were higher than in the chlorhexidine group and lower than in the placebo group. The plaque vitality scores showed a bactericidal effect in vivo with chlorhexidine and Meridol during the entire experiment. The use of Meridol resulted in more toothstaining than with the placebo, but significantly less than with chlorhexidine. This study demonstrated that Meridol reduced plaque accumulation, retarded gingivitis development, possessed a definite bactericidal action, and produced only slight toothstaining.

Adult↗