PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DOUGLAS' POUCH”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Culdocentesis.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Colpotomy↗
PubMed1999

Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis.

The aim of this study was to describe magnetic resonance (MR) imaging findings in histopathologically proven deep endometriosis infiltrating the uterosacral ligaments, the pouch of Douglas, the rectum or the bladder. Twenty patients presenting with a clinical suspicion of deep endometriosis underwent preoperative MR imaging. Sagittal and axial fast T2- and axial T1-weighted spin echo MR sequences were performed. Four patients had post-contrast images. MR results, including morphology and signal intensity of each lesion, were compared to intraoperative gross appearance and histopathology. Histopathology diagnosed 24 lesions of deep endometriosis in the uterosacral ligaments (n = 12), the pouch of Douglas (n = 2), the rectum (n = 3), the bladder (n = 7). Uterosacral ligaments with deep endometriosis were statistically different from normal uterosacral ligaments for proximal nodularity (P = 0.001). There was no difference in signal intensity between normal and abnormal uterosacral ligaments. Contrast-enhanced SE images in four patients with detrusor invasion showed an interruption of the hypointense detrusor by the enhancing bladder endometriosis. Rectal endometriosis was missed in two of three patients and showed non-specific rectal wall thickening in one patient. It is concluded that MR imaging can diagnose deep endometriosis of uterosacral ligaments, the bladder and the pouch of Douglas, but lacks sensitivity in detecting rectal endometriosis without rectal distension.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Diagnosis of enteroceles by dynamic anorectal endosonography.

PURPOSE: Enteroceles are herniations of the lining of the peritoneum and intestinal loops into the pouch of Douglas. They may accompany other pelvic and anorectal disorders or cause outlet obstruction. So far they are only diagnosed by defecography. We investigated the use of dynamic anorectal endosonography to detect this disorder. METHODS: Seventeen female patients with a defecation disorder were investigated by proctoscopy and endoluminal ultrasonography. In 14 patients defecography followed. Endosonography was performed using the curved array 7.5 MHz scanner directed to the ventral rectal wall. Dynamic studies were undertaken during rest and during maximal straining. The minimal distance between the inner verge of the anal canal and the peritoneal cavity was determined. RESULTS: Dynamic endosonography detected enteroceles in six patients in which the pouch of Douglas opened during straining and intestinal loops moved toward the anus. The diagnosis of enteroceles was confirmed in all patients by defecography giving a specificity of 100 percent. No enterocele was detected in the remaining eight patients with defecography, leading to a 100 percent sensitivity for endosonography. Comparing the 6 patients with enteroceles with the 11 patients without enterocele, the peritoneal-anal distances were at rest 3.9 +/- 0.5 and 3.3 +/- 0.5 cm (P < 0.05) and during straining 3.6 +/- 0.5 and 1.3 +/- 0.2 cm (P < 0.001), respectively. The change in peritoneal-anal distance was 2 +/- 0.5 cm in the enterocele group and 0.3 +/- 0.4 cm in the control group (P < 0.001). Two patients with enteroceles had complete rectal prolapse. Four patients with enteroceles underwent surgery. Postsurgical endoluminal endosonography showed closure of the pouch of Douglas. CONCLUSIONS: Enteroceles may be diagnosed by dynamic anorectal endosonography. Compared with defecography dynamic anorectal endosonography is easier to perform, less cumbersome for the patient, and bears no radiation exposure. Therefore, this new diagnostic means may be useful in first-line search for enteroceles, but further studies are needed to prove its sensitivity for screening of this disorder.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Laparoscopic resection of intestinal endometriosis: a 5-year experience.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical manifestations, surgical techniques, and complications observed in patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of intestinal deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized (Canadian Task Force Classification II-3). SETTING: University hospital and private practice. PATIENTS: We evaluated 125 patients with intestinal DIE treated from February 2000 through September 2005. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic radical excision of DIE followed by resection of the rectosigmoid colon. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The clinical examination of our patients demonstrated that 66.4% of patients had tenderness, whereas 80.8% had nodules on the pouch of Douglas. In 95.2% we observed pain caused by cervical mobilization, and all the patients had pain during the pouch of Douglas mobilization. Regarding bowel infiltration, preoperative investigation with rectal endoscopic ultrasonography was positive in all cases. Endoscopic rectal ultrasonography demonstrated the depth of intestinal infiltration. Superficial lesions were observed in 9.6% of patients and muscularis involvement in 71.2%. The segmental resection was performed in most of the patients (92%) and the linear resection in 6.4% of them. Median surgical time was 110 minutes, and the median hospital stay was 7 days after the surgery; the patients continued fasting for 3 to 7 days. The return to normal activity was achieved in a median 15 days after the surgery. The surgical procedure and the postoperative follow-up demonstrated no complications in 90.4% of the patients. Minor complications were observed in 4% of the cases. Major complications occurred in 5.6% of the patients, including 2 cases of intestinal fistulas (1.6%) and 3 cases of long-lasting urinary retention (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Clinical symptoms of patients with intestinal endometriosis are not specific. Operative laparoscopy is a safe and effective method to treat intestinal endometriosis. To avoid major complications, special attention must be paid to the intestinal anastomosis and to the nerve preservation.

Adult↗