PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Double stranded breaks”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

GammaH2AX and its role in DNA double-strand break repair.

One of the earliest responses to a DNA double-strand break (DSB) is the carboxy-terminal phosphorylation of budding yeast H2A (metazoan histone H2AX) to create gammaH2A (or gammaH2AX). This chromatin modification stretches more than tens of kilobases around the DSB and has been proposed to play numerous roles in break recognition and repair, although it may not be the primary signal for many of these events. Studies suggest that gammaH2A(X) has 2 more direct roles: (i) to recruit cohesin around the DSB, and (ii) to maintain a checkpoint arrest. Recent work has identified other factors, including chromatin remodelers and protein phosphatases, which target gammaH2A(X) and regulate DSB repair/recovery.

DNA↗

The repair of double-strand breaks in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its genetic control.

With the use of neutral sucrose sedimentation techniques, the size of unirradiated nuclear DNA and the repair of double-strand breaks induced in it by ionizing radiation have been determined in both wild-type and homozygous rad52 diploids of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The number average molecular weight of unirradiated DNA in these experiments is 3.0 X 10(8)+/-0.3 Daltons. Double-strand breaks are induced with a frequency of 0.58 X 10(-10) per Daltonkrad in the range of 25 to 100 krad. Since repair at low doses is observed in wild-type but not homozygous rad52 strains, the corresponding rad52 gene product is concluded to have a role in the repair process. Cycloheximide was also observed to inhibit repair to a limited extent indicating a requirement for protein synthesis. Based on the sensitivity of various mutants and the induction frequency of double-strand breaks, it is concluded that there are 1 to 2 double-strand breaks per lethal event in diploid cells incapable of repairing these breaks.

Centrifugation, Density Gradient↗

Measurement of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

We have examined the use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to measure DNA double-strand breaks induced in CHO cells by ionizing radiation. The PFGE assay provides a simple method for the measurement of DNA double-strand breaks for doses as low as 3-4 Gy ionizing radiation, and appears applicable for the measurement of damage produced by any agent producing double-strand breaks. The conditions of transverse alternating field electrophoresis determined both the sensitivity of the assay and the ability to resolve DNA fragments with different sizes. For example, with 0.8% agarose and a 1-min pulse time at 250 V for 18 h of electrophoresis, 0.39% of the DNA per gray migrated into the gel, and only molecules less than 1500 kb could be resolved. With 0.56% agarose and a 60-min pulse time at 40 V for 6 days of electrophoresis, 0.55-0.90% of the DNA per gray migrated into the gel, and molecules between 1500 and 7000 kb could be resolved.

Animals↗

Evidence for induction of DNA double strand breaks in the bystander response to targeted soft X-rays in CHO cells.

This study investigated the role of DNA double strand breaks and DNA base damage in radiation-induced bystander responses in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines. Two CHO repair-deficient clones, xrs5 (DNA double strand break repair-deficient) and EM9 (DNA base excision repair-deficient) were used in addition to the wild type (CHO). The Gray Cancer Institute ultrasoft X-ray microprobe is a powerful tool for investigating the bystander response, because it permits the irradiation of only a single nucleus of a cell, as reported previously. In order to investigate the bystander effect in each repair-deficient cell line, we irradiated a single cell within a population and scored the formation of micronuclei. When a single nucleus in the population was targeted with 1 Gy, elevated numbers of micronuclei were induced in the neighbouring unirradiated cells in the EM9 and xrs5 cell lines, whereas induction was not observed in CHO. The induction of micronuclei in xrs5 was significantly higher than that in EM9. Under these conditions, the surviving fraction in the neighbouring cells was significantly lower in xrs5 than in the other cell lines, showing a higher cell killing effect in xrs5. To confirm that bystander factors secreted from irradiated cells caused these effects, we carried out medium transfer experiments using conventional X-irradiation. Medium conditioned for 24 h with irradiated cells was transferred to unirradiated cells and elevated induction of micronuclei was observed in xrs5. These results suggest that DNA double strand breaks rather than base damage are caused by factors secreted in the medium from irradiated cells.

Animals↗

Mechanisms for gene conversion and homologous recombination: the double-strand break repair model and the successive half crossing-over model.

Two mechanisms for gene conversion and homologous recombination were discussed. (1) The double-strand break repair model. A double-strand break is expanded to a gap, which is then repaired by copying a homologous sequence. The gene conversion is often accompanied by crossing-over of the flanking sequences. We obtained evidence for this model in Red pathway of bacteriophage lambda and RecE pathway of E. coli. (2) The successive half crossing-over model. Half crossing-over leaves one recombinant duplex and one or two end(s) out of two parental duplexes. The resulting ends are, in turn, recombinogenic. Successive rounds of the half crossing-over mechanism explains why apparent plasmid gene conversion in RecF pathway of E. coli is not accompanied by crossing-over. This model can explain chromosomal gene conversion if we assume that the donor is first replicated. Gene conversion during mating-type switching in yeast, antigenic variation in unicellular microorganisms, and chromosomal gene conversion in mammalian somatic cells are explained by this model. Distinguishing between these two mechanisms is important in understanding recombination in yeast and mammalian cells and also in its application to gene targeting.

Animals↗

Measurement of intracellular dna double-strand break induction and rejoining along the track of carbon and neon particle beams in water.

PURPOSE: The study was aimed at the measurement of effect-depth distributions of intracellularly induced DNA damage in water as tissue equivalent after heavy ion irradiation with therapy particle beams. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An assay involving embedding of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO-K1) cells in large agarose plugs and electrophoretic elution of radiation induced DNA fragments by constant field gel electrophoresis was developed. Double-strand break production was quantified by densitometric analysis of DNA-fluorescence after staining with ethidium-bromide and determination of the fraction of DNA eluted out of the agarose plugs. Intracellular double-strand break induction and the effect of a 3 h rejoining incubation were investigated following irradiation with 250 kV x-rays and 109 MeV/u carbon- and 295 MeV/u neon-ions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: While the DNA damage induced by x-irradiation decreased continuously with penetration depth, a steady increase in the yield of double-strand breaks was observed for particle radiation, reaching distinct maxima at the position of the physical Bragg peaks. Beyond this, the extent of radiation damage dropped drastically. From comparison of DNA damage and calculated dose profiles, relative biological efficiencies (RBEs) for both double-strand break induction and unrejoined strand breaks after 3 h were determined. While RBE for the induction of DNA double-strand breaks decreased continuously with penetration depth, RBE maxima greater than unity were found with carbon- and neon-ions for double-strand break rejoining near the maximum range of the particles. The method presented here allows for a fast and accurate determination of depth profiles of relevant radiobiological effects for mixed particle fields in tissue equivalent.

Animals↗

Warner-Lambert/Parke-Davis Award Lecture. Pathological and physiological double-strand breaks: roles in cancer, aging, and the immune system.

Pathological agents such as ionizing radiation and oxidative free radicals can cause breaks in both strands of the DNA at a given site (double-strand break). This is the most serious type of DNA damage because neither strand is able to provide physical integrity or information content, as would be the case for single-strand DNA damage where one strand of the duplex remains intact. The repair of such breaks usually results in an irreversible alteration of the DNA. Two physiological forms of intentional double-strand (ds) DNA breakage and rejoining occur during lymphoid differentiation. One is V(D)J recombination occurring during early B and T cell development, and the other is class switch recombination, occurring exclusively in mature B cells. The manner in which physiological and most pathological double-strand DNA breaks are rejoined to restore chromosomal integrity are the same. Defects during the phases in which pathological or physiological breaks are generated or in which they are joined can result in chromosomal translocations or loss of genetic information at the site of breakage. Such events are the first step in some cancers and may be a key contributor to changes in DNA with age. Inherited defects in this process can result in severe combined immune deficiency. Hence, pathological and physiological DNA double-strand breaks are related to immune defects and cancer and may be one of the key ways in which DNA is damaged during aging.

Aging↗

Modelling the probability distribution of the number of DNA double-strand breaks due to sporadic alkylation of nucleotide bases.

Metabolites and certain chemical agents (for example methyl methanesulfonate) can induce nucleotide bases on chromosomal strands to become alkylated. These alkylated sites have the potential to become single-strand chromosomal breaks, a form of DNA damage, if they are exposed to a sufficient temperature in vitro. It has been proposed that a single-strand break (SSB) sufficiently close to another SSB on the opposite chromosomal strand will form a double-strand break (DSB). DNA repair mechanisms are less able to repair DSBs compared to SSBs. Because of the complex three-dimensional structure of DNA, some chromosomal regions are more susceptible to alkylation than others. A question of interest is therefore whether these alkylated bases are randomly distributed or tend to be clustered. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis allows the number of DNA fragments (and hence the number of DSBs) to be observed directly. The randomness of alkylation events can therefore be tested using the standard statistical hypothesis-testing framework. Under the null hypothesis, that the SSBs are randomly distributed on each of the strands, we can calculate the probability of observing a number of DSBs at least as large as that observed and hence the associated p-value. Previously, the probability distribution of the number of DSBs has been determined by Monte Carlo simulations; when considering the whole genome this can be very time consuming. In this paper, we theoretically derive an approximation to the distribution enabling appropriate probabilities to be calculated quickly. Based on previous findings we assume that the number of breaks on each strand is small compared to the number of nucleotide bases. We show that our method can give the correct probability distribution when alkylation events are relatively rare, discuss how rare these events have to be and suggest potential extensions to the model when a greater proportion of bases are alkylated.

Alkylation↗

On the mechanism of RecA-mediated repair of double-strand breaks: no role for four-strand DNA pairing intermediates.

RecA protein will bind to a gapped duplex DNA molecule and promote a DNA strand exchange with a second homologous linear duplex. A double-strand break in the second duplex is efficiently bypassed in the course of these reactions. We demonstrate that the bypass of double-strand breaks is not explained by a mechanism involving homologous interactions between two duplex DNA molecules, but instead requires the ATP-mediated generation of DNA torsional stress brought about by the action of RecA. The results suggest new pathways for the repair of double-strand breaks and underline the need for new paradigms to explain the alignment of homologous DNAs during genetic recombination.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Expression of genes involved in repair of DNA double-strand breaks in normal and tumor tissues.

BACKGROUND: DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are the major lethal lesions induced by ionizing radiation. The capability for DNA DSB repair is crucial for inherent radiosensitivity of tumor and normal cells. DNA-PKcs, Ku 70, Ku 85, Xrcc4, and Nbs1 play a critical role in DNA DSB repair. METHODS: We immunohistochemically investigated the expression of DNA-PKcs, Ku 70, Ku85, Xrcc4, and Nbs1 in 134 specimens from various normal and tumor tissues with different radiosensitivity. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Immunopositivity to Ku70, Ku85, DNA-PKcs, Xrcc4, and Nbs1 was found in all tumor tissues examined. The staining for Ku70, Ku85, and DNA-PKcs was nuclear; but, for Xrcc4 and Nbs1, it was nuclear and cytoplasmic. There were no apparent differences in the expression of these five proteins among cancerous tissues and the corresponding normal tissues. No apparent differences in nuclear staining intensity were detected in the expression of these five proteins among tumor tissues with different radiosensitivity, although non-Hodgkins' lymphoma (B or T cell) tended to show a lower expression than the others. The stromal cells generally expressed these five proteins at much lower frequency than either tumor or epithelial cells in both tumor and normal tissues.

Antigens, Nuclear↗

Distribution of S1-nuclease sensitive sites and double-strand breaks in gamma-irradiated lambda-DNA.

Double-strand breaks and regions with unpaired bases (S1-nuclease sensitive sites) are formed in the DNA of gamma-irradiated lambda-phages. The frequency of both events was determined in the various fragments produced after digestion with a restriction enzyme (Eco RI). The results show that both types of radiation damage are randomly distributed in the DNA molecule. There is no hint that the S1 sites are formed in preferred regions of the lambda-genome.

Bacteriophage lambda↗

Non-random distribution of DNA double-strand breaks induced by particle irradiation.

Induction of DNA double-strand breaks (dsbs) in mammalian cells is dependent on the spatial distribution of energy deposition from the ionizing radiation. For high LET particle radiations the primary ionization sites occur in a correlated manner along the track of the particles, while for X-rays these sites are much more randomly distributed throughout the volume of the cell. It can therefore be expected that the distribution of dsbs linearly along the DNA molecule also varies with the type of radiation and the ionization density. Using pulsed-field gel and conventional gel techniques, we measured the size distribution of DNA molecules from irradiated human fibroblasts in the total range of 0.1 kbp-10 Mbp for X-rays and high LET particles (N ions, 97 keV/microns and Fe ions, 150 keV/microns). On a mega base pair scale we applied conventional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis techniques such as measurement of the fraction of DNA released from the well (FAR) and measurement of breakage within a specific NotI restriction fragment (hybridization assay). The induction rate for widely spaced breaks was found to decrease with LET. However, when the entire distribution of radiation-induced fragments was analysed, we detected an excess of fragments with sizes below about 200 kbp for the particles compared with X-irradiation. X-rays are thus more effective than high LET radiations in producing large DNA fragments but less effective in the production of smaller fragments. We determined the total induction rate of dsbs for the three radiations based on a quantitative analysis of all the measured radiation-induced fragments and found that the high LET particles were more efficient than X-rays at inducing dsbs, indicating an increasing total efficiency with LET. Conventional assays that are based only on the measurement of large fragments are therefore misleading when determining total dsb induction rates of high LET particles. The possible biological significance of this non-randomness for dsb induction is discussed.

Blotting, Southern↗

A role for REV3 in mutagenesis during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Recombinational repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs), traditionally believed to be an error-free DNA repair pathway, was recently shown to increase the frequency of mutations in a nearby interval. The reversion rate of trp1 alleles (either nonsense or frameshift mutations) near an HO-endonuclease cleavage site is increased at least 100-fold among cells that have experienced an HO-mediated DSB. We report here that in strains deleted for rev3 this DSB-associated reversion of a nonsense mutation was greatly decreased. Thus REV3, which encodes a subunit of the translesion DNA polymerase zeta, was responsible for the majority of these base substitution errors near a DSB. However, rev3 strains showed no decrease in HO-stimulated recombination, implying that another DNA polymerase also functioned in recombinational repair of a DSB. Reversion of trp1 frameshift alleles near a DSB was not reduced in rev3 strains, indicating that another polymerase could act during DSB repair to make these frameshift errors. Analysis of spontaneous reversion in haploid strains suggested that Rev3p had a greater role in making point mutations than in frameshift mutations.

Aldose-Ketose Isomerases↗

Induction of DNA double strand breaks in scid cells by carbon ions.

The DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by X ray and carbon ion beam irradiation in scid cells were analysed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Scid cells and hybrid cells were ideal to study the DNA DSB repair mechanisms, because their genetic backgrounds were identical except DNA-PK activity. Induction of DNA DSBs was determined after exposure to X rays and carbon beams. DNA DSB repair was by biphasic kinetics with a fast and a slow component. For scid cells only a slow component was observed, whereas the kinetics of DSBs repair was biphasic with a fast and a slow component. It was concluded from the experimental data that the induced DSB rejoining in scid cells was due to the lack of DNA-PK activity.

Carbon Radioisotopes↗

Coupled homologous and nonhomologous repair of a double-strand break preserves genomic integrity in mammalian cells.

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) may be caused by normal metabolic processes or exogenous DNA damaging agents and can promote chromosomal rearrangements, including translocations, deletions, or chromosome loss. In mammalian cells, both homologous recombination and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) are important DSB repair pathways for the maintenance of genomic stability. Using a mouse embryonic stem cell system, we previously demonstrated that a DSB in one chromosome can be repaired by recombination with a homologous sequence on a heterologous chromosome, without any evidence of genome rearrangements (C. Richardson, M. E. Moynahan, and M. Jasin, Genes Dev., 12:3831-3842, 1998). To determine if genomic integrity would be compromised if homology were constrained, we have now examined interchromosomal recombination between truncated but overlapping gene sequences. Despite these constraints, recombinants were readily recovered when a DSB was introduced into one of the sequences. The overwhelming majority of recombinants showed no evidence of chromosomal rearrangements. Instead, events were initiated by homologous invasion of one chromosome end and completed by NHEJ to the other chromosome end, which remained highly preserved throughout the process. Thus, genomic integrity was maintained by a coupling of homologous and nonhomologous repair pathways. Interestingly, the recombination frequency, although not the structure of the recombinant repair products, was sensitive to the relative orientation of the gene sequences on the interacting chromosomes.

Animals↗

SIR functions are required for the toleration of an unrepaired double-strand break in a dispensable yeast chromosome.

Unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) typically result in G(2) arrest. Cell cycle progression can resume following repair of the DSBs or through adaptation to the checkpoint, even if the damage remains unrepaired. We developed a screen for factors in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that affect checkpoint control and/or viability in response to a single, unrepairable DSB that is induced by HO endonuclease in a dispensable yeast artificial chromosome containing human DNA. SIR2, -3, or -4 mutants exhibit a prolonged, RAD9-dependent G(2) arrest in response to the unrepairable DSB followed by a slow adaptation to the persistent break, leading to division and rearrest in the next G(2). There are a small number of additional cycles before permanent arrest as microcolonies. Thus, SIR genes, which repress silent mating type gene expression, are required for the adaptation and the prevention of indirect lethality resulting from an unrepairable DSB in nonessential DNA. Rapid adaptation to the G(2) checkpoint and high viability were restored in sir(-) strains containing additional deletions of the silent mating type loci HML and HMR, suggesting that genes under mating type control can reduce the toleration of a single DSB. However, coexpression of MATa1 and MATalpha2 in Sir(+) haploid cells did not lead to lethality from the HO-induced DSB, suggesting that toleration of an unrepaired DSB requires more than one Sir(+) function.

DNA Damage↗

Yeast Mre11 and Rad1 proteins define a Ku-independent mechanism to repair double-strand breaks lacking overlapping end sequences.

End joining of double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires Ku proteins and frequently involves base pairing between complementary terminal sequences. To define the role of terminal base pairing in end joining, two oppositely oriented HO endonuclease cleavage sites separated by 2.0 kb were integrated into yeast chromosome III, where constitutive expression of HO endonuclease creates two simultaneous DSBs with no complementary end sequence. Lack of complementary sequence in their 3' single-strand overhangs facilitates efficient repair events distinctly different from when the 3' ends have a 4-bp sequence base paired in various ways to create 2- to 3-bp insertions. Repair of noncomplementary ends results in a set of nonrandom deletions of up to 302 bp, annealed by imperfect microhomology of about 8 to 10 bp at the junctions. This microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) is Ku independent, but strongly dependent on Mre11, Rad50, and Rad1 proteins and partially dependent on Dnl4 protein. The MMEJ also occurs when Rad52 is absent, but the extent of deletions becomes more limited. The increased gamma ray sensitivity of rad1Delta rad52Delta yku70Delta strains compared to rad52Delta yku70Delta strains suggests that MMEJ also contributes to the repair of DSBs induced by ionizing radiation.

Antigens, Nuclear↗

DNA double-strand break repair by homologous recombination.

The induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA by exposure to DNA damaging agents, or as intermediates in normal cellular processes, constitutes a severe threat for the integrity of the genome. If not properly repaired, DSBs may result in chromosomal aberrations, which, in turn, can lead to cell death or to uncontrolled cell growth. To maintain the integrity of the genome, multiple pathways for the repair of DSBs have evolved during evolution: homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA). HR has the potential to lead to accurate repair of DSBs, whereas NHEJ and SSA are essentially mutagenic. In yeast, DSBs are primarily repaired via high-fidelity repair of DSBs mediated by HR, whereas in higher eukaryotes, both HR and NHEJ are important. In this review, we focus on the functional conservation of HR from fungi to mammals and on the role of the individual proteins in this process.

Animals↗