PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MANIPULATION, ORTHOPEDIC”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

[Treatment strategy in first traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Plea for a multi-stage concept of preventive initial management].

The purpose of this paper is to outline the treatment protocol for the first time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocator, with options including conservative, arthroscopic and open surgical treatment. Regarding the subclassification of the first time traumatic anterior dislocater, it is imparitive to differentiate between the unidirectional dislocator with and without hyperlaxity. This subclassification takes into account the structural quality of the stabilizing ligamentous structures of the glenohumeral capsule. The patient with hyperelastic ligaments exhibit elastic deformation of the glenohumeral ligaments at the time of dislocation and thus, sustain less interstitial structural damage to the ligament. Therefore, these patients benefit from non-operative treatment. There are extrinsic and intrinsic factors which determine the outcome of the primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Extrinsic factors are those that are not related to changes in the shoulder morphology. The most important extrinsic factor is the age of the patient at the time of injury. The younger the patient at the time of injury the greater the risk of recurrence. As a rule, those patients 25 years of age or less, at the time of initial injury are less likely to spontaneously stabilize without surgical intervention, than they are to develop recurrence. Secondly, the type and level of sport participation is related to recurrence. Although the severity of the trauma can not be quantified, it certainly has an influence on recurrence. Immobilization remains controversial. A rehabilitation program is more likely to be successful in atraumatic instability. Patient compliance is important regardless of the type of treatment selected. Intrinsic factors include injury to the various anatomic structures about the shoulder, occurring at the time of primary anterior shoulder dislocation. A deep Hill Sachs lesion is more likely to result in recurrence secondary to both the impaction of the bone, as well as, the reduction of the area of articular surface. A displaced bony Bankart is a highly unstable situation secondary to the loss of the butress to retain the humeral head. In contrast to a Hill Sachs lesion or a bony Bankart, a concomittent fracture of the greater tuberosity is unlikely to result in recurrent dislocation. Isolated laberal detachment is not related to recurrence, but a complete disruption of the laberal ligament complex is highly correlated with recurrence. A rare subluxation erecta, as a special form of traumatic inferior instability, has a high recurrence rate. With increasing age there is a higher risk of concomittent rotator cuff tear. In most situations surgical repair of the rotator cuff tear results in resolution of the instability. The essential issue in determining the treatment protocol is to define concomittent hyperlaxity in the injured shoulder. Concomittent hyperlaxity precludes initial surgical treatment. The orthopedic surgeon treating the patient at the time of injury needs to design a concise treatment protocol for the patient based on the assessment of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors. An unreducable shoulder dislocation or associated vascular injury requires emergent intervention. Absolute indications for surgical treatment include: persistent dislocation, bony Bankart, a grossly displaced greater tuberosity fracture, and rupture of the subscapularis tendon. Surgical stabilization of primary anterior traumatic dislocation is indicated if the following strict criteria are met: adequate trauma, no self reduction, unidirectional instability without hyperlaxity, Hill Sachs lesion, age below 26 years, high level of sport activity and the special situation of luxatio erecta. Post primary stabilization is indicated for persistent subluxation, subjective instability or demonstrated pathologic instability tests. Rotator cuff tears due to traumatic dislocation in the elderly population require surgical repair.

Arthroscopy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Nonclassic history in children with radial head subluxations.

Radial head subluxation (RHS) is a common pediatric orthopedic injury, frequently diagnosed through the classic history of axial traction to the upper extremity of a child. However, not all children with RHS will present with this classic history. This may result in misdiagnosis and delay of appropriate treatment. To evaluate the prevalence of non-classic presentations, a retrospective study was conducted of 45 emergency department patients with RHS. Of these patients, 15 presented with an atypical history. All patients were in minimal distress, holding their affected arms semiflexed and pronated (the nursemaid's position). The classic and nonclassic history groups were equivalent in patient age, spontaneous reductions, and physician reductions. A trend towards more radiographs was noted in the nonclassic group. This study suggests that even in the absence of the classic history of upper extremity traction, radial head subluxation should be suspected in any pediatric patient with an upper extremity complaint who presents with the affected arm in the nursemaid's position.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2004

Clinical reasoning strategies in physical therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Clinical reasoning remains a relatively under-researched subject in physical therapy. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine the clinical reasoning of expert physical therapists in 3 different fields of physical therapy: orthopedic (manual) physical therapy, neurological physical therapy, and domiciliary care (home health) physical therapy. SUBJECTS: The subjects were 6 peer-designated expert physical therapists (2 from each field) nominated by leaders within the Australian Physiotherapy Association and 6 other interviewed experts representing each of the same 3 fields. METHODS: Guided by a grounded theory method, a multiple case study approach was used to study the clinical practice of the 6 physical therapists in the 3 fields. RESULTS: A model of clinical reasoning in physical therapy characterized by the notion of "clinical reasoning strategies" is proposed by the authors. Within these clinical reasoning strategies, the application of different paradigms of knowledge and their interplay within reasoning is termed "dialectical reasoning." DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The findings of this study provide a potential clinical reasoning framework for the adoption of emerging models of impairment and disability in physical therapy.

Data Collection↗
PubMed2001

Traumatic posterior dislocation of hip in children.

Traumatic posterior dislocation of the hip joint in children is an uncommon injury. It constitutes a true orthopedic emergency. It makes up over 80% of pediatric hip dislocations. In children, it can occur as a result of minimal trauma, which is attributed to a soft pliable acetabulum and ligamentous laxity. In skeletally mature adolescents, a greater force is required to dislocate the hip joint. Delay in reduction is associated with long-term complications such as avascular necrosis and degenerative arthritis. Avascular necrosis is related to the duration of dislocation. A poorer prognosis is associated with delay in reduction beyond 6 hours, advanced skeletal maturity, or multiple traumas. Prompt reduction minimizes complications. We report two cases of traumatic posterior dislocation of hip in children aged 3 and 14 years. Both were reduced within 6 hours of dislocation, and review at 6 months revealed normal examination and no evidence of any post-traumatic changes. Post-reduction treatment remains without a consensus. This review highlights the clinical presentation, management, and time-sensitive complications of the injury.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Prediction of costs-of-illness in patients with low back pain undergoing orthopedic outpatient rehabilitation.

The objectives of this study were (1) to assess societal costs-of-illness and their changes in the year prior to and after outpatient rehabilitation (OPR) in initially gainfully employed persons with low back pain and (2) to identify predictors (cost drivers) for high overall costs in the year after the intervention. The health economical analysis is part of a prospective clinical trial investigating patients participating in orthopedic OPR. In all gainfully employed patients (n=244) resource consumption and productivity losses were assessed prior to OPR and 12 months afterwards. Overall annual medical costs per person were estimated. Parameters associated with high overall costs in the 12 months after OPR were predicted by multivariate logistic regression analysis. All sociodemographic, motivational, clinical, psychological, therapeutic and vocational variables were included as possible predictors. Costs due to sick leave periods represent the major component (83%/58%) of overall costs in both periods. The comparison of costs 12 months before and after OPR reveals a significant reduction from 8050 to 3200 per person, primarily caused by decreasing sick leave costs and the reduction of costs related to inpatient treatment. The prediction analysis reveals that patients with limited functional abilities, with problems due to strenuous labour, with low expectations in terms of possible improvement after OPR, with a high pain score or with limited satisfaction with working colleagues have a significantly higher risk for costs exceeding 2200 after OPR. The identified cost drivers can be used to develop multimodal therapeutic measures, which should be employed during the OPR intervention in order to prevent future costs.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The dental-chiropractic cotreatment of structural disorders of the jaw and temporomandibular joint dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To present a case demonstrating the concept of integrated dental-orthopedic and craniochiropractic care for treating structural disorders of the jaw, neck and spine. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 33-yr-old woman sought orthodontic therapy for an overbite and severe crowding of the lower teeth. She reported a history of bilateral headaches and jaw popping. Orthodontic examination revealed degenerative changes in the right temporomandibular joint and restricted jaw opening. While in treatment, the patient began to experience severe temporomandibular joint pain and neck/lower back pain, which convinced her to accept chiropractic care. Initial chiropractic sacro-occipital technique (SOT) evaluation found Category II weight-bearing instability of the sacroiliac joint, specific thoracic and cervical vertebral subluxations, cranial sutural restrictions and temporomandibular dysfunction. Cervical X-rays revealed absence of the anterior cervical curve, characterized by parallel vertebral base lines. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: In addition to orthodontic treatment, the patient also received semiweekly (then bimonthly) adjustments of the spine, neck and cranial sutures. The cotreatment approach eliminated pain while improving head, jaw and tooth position. CONCLUSION: The position of the jaw and head and neck are intricately linked. The acute symptoms experienced during the initial dental treatment phase were caused by the inability of the head and neck to adapt to maxillary and mandibular changes. Chiropractic treatments enabled the body to respond positively to the dental changes. As the mandibular position improved, further improvements were indicated by physical testing and X-rays.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Etomidate versus midazolam for procedural sedation in pediatric outpatients: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Midazolam is widely used for procedural sedation and analgesia. Etomidate has been studied mostly in adults. Our objective is to compare the efficacy of etomidate and midazolam for achieving procedural sedation and analgesia in children. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, emergency department and orthopedic clinic-based trial was carried out among patients aged 2 to 18 years with displaced extremity fractures. Patients were administered 1 microg/kg of fentanyl and either 0.2 mg/kg of etomidate or 0.1 mg/kg of midazolam. Adequate sedation was defined, for the purpose of this study, as a score of 4 or more on the Ramsay Sedation Scale. The primary outcome was induction and recovery time. The rates of adverse events, success of fracture reduction, and parent and physician satisfaction were also compared. RESULTS: From April to August 2004, 100 of 128 eligible patients were enrolled (age 8.7+/-3.7 years; 50% male patients). A higher proportion of patients attained adequate sedation among those who received etomidate: 46 of 50 (92%) versus 18 of 50 (36%) (delta 56%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 38% to 69%). Time taken for induction (hazard ratio 4.9; 95% CI 2.2 to 10.9) and time taken for recovery (hazard ratio 2.8; 95% CI 1.5 to 5.1) were lower among patients who received etomidate. The rates of adverse events were similar in both groups, except for myoclonus and pain at the injection site, which was more frequent in the etomidate group. CONCLUSION: Induction and recovery times are shorter with etomidate compared with midazolam. At the dosages used for procedural sedation and analgesia among children with displaced extremity fracture, etomidate has higher efficacy in comparison with midazolam.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

[Value of orthopedic treatment of distal fractures of the forearm in children. Apropos of 152 cases].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Distal forearm fractures in children are frequent. Management is conservative except in rare cases which will be discussed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 152 distal forearm fractures after 10 and a half months (6 to 48 months) of follow-up was carried-out. Age ranged from 2 to 16 years (mean 10 years). Orthopaedic treatment was proposed in each case, but in 5, surgical treatment was required at onset. Clinical and radiological fracture reduction analysis was conducted immediately post op and during follow-up. 92 per cent of these fractures had a posterior or posterolateral angulation (with a mean angulation of 28 degrees 5). Among these cases, 64 per cent had instability criteria. Degree of translation when present (79 cases) was at 100 per cent in 55 cases (70 per cent); greater than 50 per cent in 11 cases (14 per cent) and less than 50 per cent in 13 cases (16 per cent). In 12 cases (8 per cent), the displacement was anterior with a degree of translation greater than 50 per cent in 6 cases and an angulation always greater than 30 degrees in the 6 remaining cases. RESULTS: In 5 cases, surgical treatment was necessary due to initial instability and/or irreducibility. In 147 cases, analysis of instability criteria, reduction and cast quality, and of fracture location showed displacements in cases of non-adapted and incorrect X-ray work up (6 cases of 6); in 18 cases of 24 when the cast was adapted but with incorrect X-ray work-up; in 5 cases of 10 when the cast was non-adapted with correct X-ray work-up, in 3 cases of 7 when the fracture was superiorly located; and in 6 cases of 6 when cast was prematurely opened. DISCUSSION: Close reduction is possible for fractures with large displacement but must be done perfectly and the cast must be adapted. If instability, irreducibility and/or incorrect reduction exist, management must include posterolateral and intrafocal percutaneous pinning, especially in older children. While rare, this indication must be known.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part III. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis recruited from the practices of orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons throughout Maine. OBJECTIVE: To assess 1-year outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated surgically or nonsurgically. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No randomized trials and few nonexperimental studies have compared surgical and nonsurgical treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. The authors' goal was to assess 1-year outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated surgically or nonsurgically. METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients participated in baseline interviews and were then mailed follow-up questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical data were obtained from a physician questionnaire. Outcomes included patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, functional status, disability, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS: One hundred forty-eight patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were enrolled, of whom 81 were treated surgically and 67 treated nonsurgically. On average, patients in the surgical group had more severe imaging findings and symptoms and worse functional status than patients in the nonsurgical group at entry. Few patients with mild symptoms were treated surgically, and few patients with severe symptoms were treated nonsurgically. However, of the patients with moderate symptoms, a similar percent were treated surgically or nonsurgically. One year after study entry, 28% of nonsurgically and 55% of surgically treated patients reported definite improvement in their predominant symptoms (P = 0.003). For patients with moderate symptoms, outcomes for surgically treated patients were also improved compared with those of nonsurgically treated patients. Surgical treatment remained a significant determinant of 1-year outcome, even after adjustment for differences between treatment groups at entry (P = 0.05). The maximal benefit of surgery was observed by the time of the first follow-up evaluation, which was at 3 months. Although few nonsurgically treated patients experienced a worsening of their condition, there was little improvement in symptoms and functional status compared with study entry. CONCLUSIONS: At a 1-year evaluation of patient-reported outcomes, patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis who were treated surgically had greater improvement than patients treated nonsurgically. Comparisons of outcomes by treatment received must be made cautiously because of differences in baseline characteristics. A determination of whether the outcomes observed persist requires long-term follow-up.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The Maine Lumbar Spine Study, Part II. 1-year outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica.

STUDY DESIGN: The Maine Lumbar Spine Study is a prospective cohort study of patients recruited from the practices of orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and occupational medicine physicians throughout Maine. OBJECTIVE: To assess 1-year outcomes of patients with sciatica believed to be due to a herniated lumbar disc treated surgically or nonsurgically. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar spine surgery rates vary by geographic region and may reflect uncertainty about optimal clinical use. METHODS: Eligible consenting patients participated in a baseline interview performed by study personnel and then were mailed follow-up questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical data were obtained from a physician questionnaire. Outcomes included patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, functional status, disability, quality of life, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS: Five hundred seven patients with sciatica, 275 treated surgically and 232 treated nonsurgically initially, were enrolled. Surgically treated patients, on average, had more severe symptoms and had more severe physical and imaging findings than nonsurgically treated patients at entry. Although few surgically treated patients had mild symptoms and few nonsurgically treated patients had severe symptoms, about half in each treatment group had symptoms that fell into a moderate category. At the 1-year evaluation, improvement in symptoms, functional status, and disability were found in both treatment groups. However, surgically treated patients reported significantly greater improvement. For the predominant symptom, either back or leg pain, 71% of surgically treated and 43% of nonsurgically treated patients reported definite improvement (P < 0.001). This effect was even greater after adjustment for differences between treatment groups at entry (relative odds of definite improvement, 4.3; P < 0.001). For patients with moderate symptoms and abnormal physical examination findings, surgical treatment also resulted in greater improvement than nonsurgical treatment. However, there was little difference in the employment or workers' compensation status of patients treated surgically versus nonsurgically (5% vs. 7% unemployed at 1-year follow-up if employed at entry [P = 0.68]; 46% vs. 55% receiving workers' compensation at 1-year follow-up if receiving it at entry [P = 0.30] for surgical and nonsurgical management, respectively). For patients with mild symptoms, the benefits of surgical and nonsurgical treatment were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Although surgically treated patients were on average more symptomatic at entry, there was substantial overlap in symptoms between surgically treated and nonsurgically treated patients. Surgically treated patients with sciatica reported substantially greater improvement at 1-year follow-up. However, employment and compensation outcomes were similar between the two treatment groups, and surgery appeared to provide little advantage for the subset of patients with mild symptoms. These results should be interpreted cautiously, because surgical treatment was not assigned randomly. Long-term follow-up will determine if these differences persist.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1984

Open v closed reduction of the fractured nose.

A stepwise study of nasal fractures includes an initial investigation that was carried out to discover why so many patients were awaiting rhinoplasty, which led us to find a 30% to 40% failure rate in nasal manipulation operations. We then studied the mechanics of nasal fracture by striking fresh cadaver noses. We found that if the nasal bones were deviated by more than half the bridge width, there was a concomitant C-shape fracture of the bony and cartilaginous septum. Two trials were performed, and patients with nasal deviation after trauma were allocated to either manipulation or manipulation plus excision of septal cartilage (closed or open reduction). Both trials were statistically significant, indicating that open reduction is the preferred treatment for patients with a deviation of more than half the bridge width of the nose.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

Lateral knee compartment osseous pseudoligamentous instability.

Five occurrences of intra-articular lateral knee compartment osseous pseudoligamentous instability associated with three cases of fractures of the posterior lateral femoral condyle are reported. The instability being located within the knee joint region was termed false in that it was due to fracture instability rather than the usual ligamentous, or true, instability. The main clinical diagnostic guide to this type of instability was a positive manual straight-knee adduction snap-click test that consisted of an initial snap followed in sequence by a click on release of adduction. The positive adduction snap-click test is an adjunct to the roentgenographic recognition of lateral knee compartment osseous pseudoligamentous instability.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Anaesthesia for treating distal radial fracture in adults.

BACKGROUND: Fracture of the distal radius is a common clinical problem, particularly in older white women with osteoporosis. Anaesthesia is usually provided during manipulation of displaced fractures or during surgical treatment. OBJECTIVES: To examine the evidence for the relative effectiveness of the main methods of anaesthesia (haematoma block, intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA), regional nerve blocks, sedation and general anaesthesia) as well as associated physical techniques and drug adjuncts used during the management of distal radial fractures in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (January 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to October 2001), EMBASE (1988 to 2001 Week 48), Current Controlled Trials (December 2001) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials evaluating relevant interventions for these injuries (see Objectives). We excluded pharmacological trials comparing drug dosages and, with one exception, different drugs in the same class. Also excluded were trials reporting only pharmacokinetic and/or physiological outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All trials meeting the selection criteria were independently assessed by the three reviewers for methodological quality. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. Quantitative data are presented using relative risks or mean differences together with 95 per cent confidence limits. Only very limited pooling of results from comparable trials was possible. MAIN RESULTS: The 18 included studies involved at least 1200, mainly female and older, patients with fractures of the distal radius. All studies had serious methodological limitations, notably in the frequent failure to assess clinically important and longer-term outcomes. Five trials provided evidence that, when compared with haematoma block, IVRA provided better analgesia during fracture manipulation and enabled better and easier reduction of the fracture, with some indication of a reduced risk of later redislocation or need for re-reduction. In contrast, haematoma block was quicker and easier to perform and less resource intensive. There was inadequate evidence of relative effectiveness of different methods of anaesthesia only examined within single trials: nerve block versus haematoma block; intravenous sedation versus haematoma block; general anaesthesia versus haematoma block; general anaesthesia versus sedation; and general anaesthesia versus haematoma block and sedation. None of the three trials evaluating three different physical aspects of anaesthesia (injection site of, or extra tourniquet, for IVRA; and technique for brachial plexus block) provided conclusive evidence for the effectiveness and safety of the novel technique. Six trials examined the use of drug adjuncts. The addition of two different muscle relaxants and one analgesic was tested for IVRA; one sedative and hyaluronidase for haematoma block; and clonidine for brachial plexus block. All trials evaluating adjuncts failed to provide evidence on eventual clinical outcome. A seriously flawed study comparing bupivacaine with prilocaine for IVRA gave some insight on the potential confounding effects of treatment by different doctors on patient outcome. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient robust evidence from randomised trials to establish the relative effectiveness of different methods of anaesthesia, different associated physical techniques or the use of drug adjuncts in the treatment of distal radial fractures. There is, however, some indication that haematoma block provides poorer analgesia than IVRA, and can compromise reduction. Given the many unresolved questions over the management of these fractures, we suggest an integrated programme of research, which includes consideration of anaesthesia options, is the way forward.

Aged↗