PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “METHOTRIMEPRAZINE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1983

Circulation, respiration and serotonin levels in carcinoid patients during neurolept anaesthesia.

Release of hormones peri-operatively in patients with metastatic carcinoids may lead to severe circulatory and respiratory disturbances. Fourteen patients with liver metastases were studied during 16 operations with a modified neurolept anaesthesia in order to evaluate the central haemodynamic and respiratory functions as well as plasma serotonin levels. The premedication in five patients was supplemented with levopromazine. During the 11 operations performed on patients not pretreated with levopromazine, no major significant fluctuations in circulatory or respiratory functions were recorded although big variations in serotonin plasma levels were measured. In the patients treated with levopromazine, however, significant changes were observed in heart rate, mean pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac index, and left and right ventricular stroke work especially during flushing episodes. However, these changes did not correlate with the changes in plasma serotonin levels. Modified neurolept anaesthesia without levopromazine pretreatment combined with careful monitoring seems to be a safe procedure for carcinoid patients. Using this type of anaesthetic procedure only one major complication occurred in connexion with 16 major operations and then in the postoperative period.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

The effects of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and levomepromazine on the metabolic ratio of debrisoquine.

The in vivo inhibitory effect of five beta-adrenoceptor antagonists and levomepromazine on debrisoquine metabolism was assessed in 37 subjects. The debrisoquine phenotyping test was performed before and after 7 days' treatment with oxprenolol (40 mg three times daily), propranolol (20 mg three times daily), timolol (10 mg twice daily), pindolol (5 mg twice daily), metoprolol (50 mg twice daily) or levomepromazine (10 mg daily), each of which was given to six-seven subjects. No clear change in the urinary metabolic ratio of debrisoquine/4-OH-debrisoquine (MR) was seen with any of the single beta-adrenoceptor antagonist treatments, but the MR value increased significantly when all beta-adrenoceptor blocker treatments were considered together. Debrisoquine metabolism was clearly impaired after levomepromazine 10 mg daily for 7 days; the mean MR increased from 1.24 +/- 1.6 to 4.70 +/- 5.23 (P = 0.018) and the excretion of 4-hydroxydebrisoquine decreased from 0.92 +/- 0.46 mg to 0.31 +/- 0.19 mg (P = 0.043). Thus, levomepromazine changes MRs towards those characteristic of phenotypically poor metabolizers, but beta-adrenoceptor antagonists at the doses examined have only a marginal effect.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1982

Avoiding psychic adverse effects during induction of neurolept anaesthesia with levomepromazine. A double-blind study of levomepromazine and droperidol.

Levomepromazine 0.1 mg/kg or droperidol 0.15 mg/kg for induction of neurolept anaesthesia were compared in a double-blind prospective study of 60 patients undergoing upper abdominal surgery. On the morning after surgery, eight of 30 patients (26.7%) who received droperidol remembered having had unpleasant anxiety, or nightmarish or panicky experiences during induction of anaesthesia, whereas only one of 30 patients (3.3%) receiving levomepromazine experienced such unpleasant adverse effects (P less than 0.01). During anaesthesia, the patients induced with levomepromazine needed somewhat less fentanyl, had somewhat less pain intensity, during the first 3 h after surgery, and they required the first postoperative dose of morphine 1.5 h later than the patients receiving droperidol (P less than 0.02). There was no difference in the number of patients receiving naloxone at the end of anaesthesia in the two groups. However, 21 of 30 patients (70%) in the levomepromazine group and only seven of 30 patients (23.3%) in the droperidol group were given physostigmine for arousal at the end of anaesthesia (P less than 0.01). There was no difference between the two groups in the occurrence of postoperative nausea, restlessness, hallucinations, or sedation in the recovery ward. This study shows that levomepromazine is superior to droperidol for induction of neurolept anaesthesia because it gives less psychic adverse effects, more analgesia, and a deeper sedation, which is easily reversed with physostigmine at the end of anaesthesia.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1984

Clinical efficacy, extrapyramidal symptoms and serum levels: influence of administration schedules and concomitant drugs on serum bromperidol concentrations.

Bromperidol (4 or 12 mg per day) was administered to 18 newly admitted schizophrenics and 29 chronic schizophrenic inpatients once or four times a day and the two dose schedules were compared. The bromperidol levels in the four-times-a-day group were significantly higher than those in the once-a-day group and the daily variation in the serum level of the agent was markedly wider in the latter than in the former patients. The incidence and severity of extrapyramidal symptoms were not significantly different between the two. A clear relationship was not present between the serum levels and the development of extrapyramidal symptoms. The bromperidol serum values were not correlated with the therapeutic response but, at more than 5 ng per ml, there might be a positive correlation between the bromperidol levels and clinical efficacy in the newly admitted schizophrenics. As for concomitant medication, levomepromazine may raise the bromperidol serum level. An anti-parkinson drug failed to depress the bromperidol level.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Effects of levomepromazine and different desflurane concentrations upon electrocardiographic variables in dogs.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of levomepromazine and different desflurane concentrations upon electrocardiographic variables. ANIMALS: Twenty adult mongrel dogs of both sexes weighing 6-28 kg. METHODS: Dogs were divided into two groups of 10 animals. Group 1 received 1 mg kg(-1) i.v. of levomepromazine and 15 minutes later anesthesia was induced with propofol (3 mg kg(-1) i.v.). Desflurane end-tidal concentration was set at 1.6 MAC. After 30 minutes at this concentration, measurements were taken and the end-tidal concentration was reduced to 1.4 MAC. Thereafter, it was reduced to 1.2 and then 1.0 MAC at 15-minute intervals. The same procedure was followed for group 2, except that levomepromazine was replaced with 0.2 mL kg(-1) of 0.9% saline solution and more propofol was needed for induction (7 mg kg(-1)). The animals' body temperature was maintained between 38.3 and 39 degrees C using a heating pad. The electrocardiographic tracing was obtained from lead II throughout the experimental period. The measurements were taken immediately before the administration of levomepromazine or placebo (T1), 15 minutes after pre-medication (T2) and 30 minutes after the establishment of 1.6 MAC (T3). The other measurements were made at the concentrations of 1.4, 1.2, and 1.0 MAC, respectively (T(4-6)). The numerical data were submitted to analysis of variance plus F-test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The dogs that received levomepromazine had a decrease in heart rate. However, in both groups it increased with desflurane administration. Levomepromazine, in association with desflurane, did not induce significant electrocardiographic changes, and all mean values (except P-wave duration) were within the reference range for this species. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study documented that levomepromazine, in association with desflurane, does not induce significant changes in electrocardiographic variables, suggesting that this drug combination has minimal effect on myocardial conduction.

Analgesics, Non-Narcotic↗
PubMed1983

Levomepromazine elimination in patients during active and sham hemodialysis.

The effect of active and sham dialysis on the plasma concentration of levomepromazine was studied in seven schizophrenic patients undergoing hemodialysis treatment in a double-blind crossover study. Samples of blood were collected before, after 2 h and 5 h of treatment, and once a week during the treatment program. The plasma concentrations decreased during both active and sham dialysis. The data indicate that there was no significant difference in the elimination of the drug between active and sham hemodialysis.

Adult↗