PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Monitoring, Intraoperative”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

[Monitoring intraoperative awareness. Vegetative signs, isolated forearm technique, electroencephalogram, and acute evoked potentials].

Several methods have been developed to quantify central anaesthetic effects and monitor awareness during general anaesthesia. The most important of these are the PRST score, calculated from changes in blood pressure, heart rate, sweating, and tear production, the isolated forearm technique, where the patient is allowed to move during surgery, the processed electroencephalogram (EEG) and the derived parameters median frequency (MF) and spectral-edge frequency (SEF), and mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). In clinical practice, the application of individual doses of anaesthetics is generally guided by autonomic vegetative clinical signs such as changes in blood pressure, heart rate, sweating, and tear production, quantified as the PRST score. Unfortunately, these parameters are not very reliable with regard to predicting the suppression of consciousness and awareness, especially when high-dose opioids are used in patients with cardiovascular medications and a variety of accompanying diseases. The PRST score probably indicates mainly the autonomic responses to painful stimuli, and seems to be useful in guiding the individual use of analgesics. The isolated forearm technique is a useful test of the patient's responsiveness during general anaesthesia, and thus an instrument for investigating the incidence of awareness during different anaesthetic regimens and when muscle relaxants are employed. A disadvantage is that it can only be used for 20 to 30 min because of pressure-induced nerve blocks or lesions. It can not be employed when long-term relaxation is necessary and consciousness and awareness are to be monitored continuously. The processed EEG and the derived parameters MF and SEF are important scientific tools to quantify central effects of many anaesthetics and opioid analgesics that allow the development of pharmacodynamic-pharmacokinetic models of anaesthetic action. MF has proven to be useful in monitoring closed-loop feedback of intravenous drug administration. Unfortunately, until now there have been no clinical studies that document the usefulness of MF or SEF with regard to predicting intraoperative arousal or awareness. To the contrary, some experimental data failed to predict imminent arousal and response to surgical incision or verbal commands by MF or SEF. Therefore, the EEG seems to be of limited value for monitoring awareness, consciousness, or memory formation during anaesthesia. MLAEP are suppressed in a dose-dependent fashion by many general anaesthetics and correlate with wakefulness, awareness, and explicit and implicit memory during anaesthesia and seem to be a promising method of monitoring awareness during anaesthesia. Nevertheless, future studies will have to determine threshold values for the different MLAEP parameters for intraoperative awareness and explicit and implicit recall of intraoperatively presented information for the different commonly used anaesthetics. Only then will it be possible to determine the usefulness of the method in clinical practice.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2002

Total intravenous anesthesia for intraoperative monitoring of the motor pathways: an integral view combining clinical and experimental data.

OBJECT: Monitoring of descending corticospinal pathways by using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) has proven to be useful in preventing permanent neurological deficits during cranial and spinal procedures. Difficulties in interpretation of intraoperative changes in potentials may largely be attributed to the effects of anesthesia. Development of suitable intravenous anesthesia protocols specifically tailored for MEP monitoring, including plasma level target-controlled infusion (TCI), requires precise knowledge of the specific neurophysiological properties of the various agents. METHODS: The effects of alfentanil, sufentanil, fentanyl, remifentanil, thiopental, midazolam, etomidate, ketamine, and propofol on neurogenic and myogenic MEPs were evaluated in an integral study combining clinical data obtained in 40 patients and experimental investigations conducted in 140 animals. The dose-dependent modulation of MEPs after electrical and magnetoelectrical stimulation of the motor cortex was recorded from peripheral muscles and the spinal cord. The results were as follows: opioids, propofol, and thiopental suppressed myogenic, but not neurogenic MEPs in a dose-dependent fashion; remifentanil exerted the least suppressive effects. Etomidate and midazolam did not suppress myogenic MEP, even at plasma concentrations sufficient for anesthesia. Ketamine induced moderate reduction of compound muscle action potential amplitudes only at high doses. Remifentanil and propofol administered via TCI systems allowed recording of myogenic potentials within a defined target plasma concentration range. CONCLUSIONS: Development of standardized total intravenous anesthesia/TCI protocols by using anesthetic agents such as propofol, remifentanil, ketamine, and midazolam, which have favorable pharmacokinetic and neurophysiological properties, will enhance the quality of intraoperative MEPs and promote the use of MEP monitoring as a useful tool to reduce surgery-related morbidity.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Intraoperative monitoring of early auditory evoked potentials in hearing acoustic neuroma patients complemented by cochlear nerve action potentials].

Hearing preservation was attempted in eight cases of acoustic neurinomas with good preoperative hearing. This was successful in 3 cases. Brain-stem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP0 were monitored in all cases, and compound nerve action potentials (CNAP) were recorded from the cochlear nerve in the last 3 cases. The BAEP was extremely sensitive to intraoperative manipulation. Intraoperative loss of wave V in BAEP was observed not only in all 5 cases with postoperative hearing loss, but also in 2 out of 3 cases with successful hearing preservation. CNAP correlated better with the hearing outcome than BAEP. In the cases where hearing was preserved, intact CNAP responses were demonstrated at the end of the operation. Conversely, deterioration of CNAP was seen in a case of postoperative hearing loss. CNAP was 10-15 times larger in amplitude than BAEP, so that the new responses were obtainable in shorter intervals. This capability of frequent examination seemed to increase the possibility of avoiding irreversible damage to the hearing by changing surgical tactics. The addition of CNAP monitoring is a good supplement to conventional BAEP monitoring in acoustic neurinoma surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Intraoperative monitoring of sensory evoked potentials may be neither a proven nor an indicated technique.

Excluding specific neurosurgical indications for cortical localization or peripheral nerve surgery, the use of sensory evoked potentials as a monitor in the operating room should be controversial at this time. Whether appropriate or not, legal and medical forces have largely established the use of somatosensory evoked potential monitoring as a standard during procedures that threaten the integrity of the spinal cord. The author believes that such monitoring should not replace the use of a "wake-up" test during these procedures because of the recognized possible occurrence of false negative results (i.e., normal evoked potentials despite abnormal spinal cord function). Another apparent established practice is monitoring of brainstem auditory evoked potentials to recognize the onset of disturbance in the auditory system. It has not been established that other recommended evoked potential monitoring practices, such as somatosensory evoked potential monitoring for such purposes as recognizing cerebral ischemia, or brainstem auditory evoked potential monitoring for recognizing untoward medullary stimulation, are as good as or better for these purposes than currently recognized and simpler monitors.

Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory↗
PubMed1981

[Selective proximal vagotomy with intraoperative monitoring using Burge's test].

Only the test by Burge shows an effective evidence among the intraoperative control methods for testing the completeness of section during selective proximal vagotomy. The postoperative results are discussed in this study. 78 patients of 91 could be controlled endoscopically 3 to 60 months postoperatively. The result of the group with the Burge test (n = 38) does not differ essentially from the group without the Burge test (n = 40). However, the Burge test has a didactic importance certainly for surgeons in the training.

Electric Stimulation↗
PubMed1982

[Electroencephalographic findings during open heart surgery. Automatic analysis in relation to parameters of anesthesia and use in intraoperative monitoring of cerebral function].

It is generally agreed upon by experts that EEG monitoring of brain function during open heart surgery is of the utmost importance in preventing postoperative neurological and psychopathological consequences. Up to now, however, this monitoring has not been performed on a large scale: (1) it is a very time-consuming task for the clinical neurophysiologist: (2) the anesthetist does not generally possess enough knowledge of this part of neurophysiology to get more than only a rough impression of the alterations of brain function during these procedures. To improve this situation we developed an automatic method to monitor brain function: the results of period-amplitude analysis of the EEG are continuously related to a number of important parameters--blood pressure, temperature, anesthesia. The way this is done resembles to a large degree the procedure which the neurophysiologist uses to judge the EEG during monitoring. The system generates warning and alerting signals, which also indicate the kind of disturbance when a marginal situation occurs. The anesthetist may take measures within 1 min to restore the condition. This is in complete agreement with the needs of anesthesiology. By means of a special function keyboard the anesthetist uses the system interactively and introduces all the necessary information which is needed for the proper functioning of the warning system (kind and quantity of different anesthetics and other drugs). At the end of the procedure the total information about the EEG, patient parameters and anesthetic measures are plotted in graphical form and printed as a table for documentation purposes which to a large degree may do away with the usual documentation. The introduction of this automatic monitoring system opens the way to a large scale use of EEG monitoring during open heart surgery.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1997

Intraoperative monitoring of facial nerve antidromic potentials during acoustic neuroma surgery.

The present paper presents monopolar recording of facial nerve antidromic potentials as an alternative technique to facial electromyography for the continuous monitoring of the facial nerve during acoustic neuroma surgery. The investigation involved 22 patients undergoing acoustic neuroma surgery via a retrosigmoid approach (tumour sizes ranging from 5 to 28 mm). Bipolar electrical stimulation of the marginalis mandibulae was performed to elicit facial nerve antidromic potentials. Stimulus intensity ranged from 2 to 6 mA with a delivery rate of 7/sec. A silver wire monopolar electrode positioned intracranially on the proximal portion of the acoustic facial bundle was used to record antidromic potentials. To define the specific origin of the action potentials and acquire normative data, monopolar and bipolar recordings of facial nerve antidromic potentials were performed in 15 subjects undergoing retrosigmoid vestibular neurectomy for Meniere's disease. The average facial nerve antidromic potential latency was 4.2 (+/- 0.6) msec in subjects with acoustic neuroma and 3.3 (+/- 0.2) msec in subjects with Meniere's disease. Facial nerve antidromic potentials furnished near real-time information about intraoperative facial nerve damage and postoperative facial nerve function during acoustic neuroma surgery. Facial nerve antidromic potentials may provide additional information to conventional EMG. They allow the use of endplate blockers, yield quantitative estimation of facial nerve conduction properties in terms of amplitude and latency, and allow actual continuous monitoring of the facial nerve.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Total intravenous anesthesia for improvement of intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials during aneurysm surgery.

Two anesthetic regimens for monitoring somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) during intracranial aneurysm surgery were compared. Eighty-four sequential cases of intracranial aneurysms were operated on employing SEP monitoring. The first group of 22 cases was anesthetized with "balanced anesthesia" and the second group of 62 cases received total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) consisting of propofol and alfentanil. In the TIVA group, the amplitude of early cortical SEP responses (N20-P25, or P40-N50) was significantly higher than that of responses in the balanced anesthesia group. In median nerve SEPs, the averaged amplitude of N20-P25 was 3.22 microV with TIVA and 1.69 microV with balanced anesthesia (P = 0.006). Similarly, posterior tibial nerve SEPs showed a P40-N50 response of 1.85 microV and 1.00 microV, respectively (P = 0.017). The superior signal-to-noise ratio obtained with TIVA allowed more frequent and reliable intraoperative SEP recordings than was possible with balanced anesthesia, resulting in rapid and reliable feedback for the surgeon. In 19% of median nerve SEPs recorded with TIVA, the cortical responses were over 5 microV in amplitude, so that reproducible N20-P25 responses were obtainable by averaging only 10 to 50 serial responses, that is, two to three recordings per minute. The higher amplitude of posterior tibial nerve SEPs recorded with TIVA made monitoring during surgery for anterior communicating artery aneurysms possible in all cases. This was not always the case with balanced anesthesia. The late deflection of median nerve SEPs (N30) was more frequently observed with TIVA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Alfentanil↗