SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nephrectomy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Hand-assisted vs. retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively compared our initial experience with the hand-assisted and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy techniques to determine if there are important differences between these approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four laparoscopic cases consisting of 12 hand-assisted and 12 retroperitoneal nephrectomies were compared. All cases but one were radical nephrectomies with intact specimen extraction performed for suspected stage T1 neoplasms. Data were collected from medical records and a postoperative questionnaire. To determine if significant learning curves existed, the first six nephrectomies in each group were compared with the second six nephrectomies on the basis of operative criteria. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, body mass index, ASA rating, or number of previous abdominal operations. RESULTS: Although the mean tumor volume was greater in the hand-assisted group than the retroperitoneal group, the difference did not quite reach statistical significance (91.19 v 24.7 cc3; P = 0.06). The mean operative time, estimated blood loss, narcotic use (milligrams of intravenous morphine equivalent), hours to oral intake, hospital stay, and estimated percent activity at 2 weeks for the hand-assisted group (238.33 min, 293.75 mL, 35.7 mg, 17.56 hours, 4.4 days, 74.75%, respectively) were not significantly different from the values in the retroperitoneal group (255.83 min, 141.67 mL, 24.5 mg, 22.36 hours, 3.6 days, 76.91%). We found no significant difference in the mean operative times for the first and second six cases in either group. CONCLUSION: In the initial experience and comparison of hand-assisted and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy, we found no significant differences in operative time, estimated blood loss, narcotic usage, hours to oral intake, hospital stay, or activity level at 2 weeks postoperatively. A randomized trial is under way at our institution.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with a diode laser: porcine results.

PURPOSE: To develop a safe and effective technique for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without need for hilar occlusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic transperitoneal lower-pole partial nephrectomy was performed in five 45- to 50-kg female farm pigs using a 980-nm diode laser. Standard transperitoneal access was obtained, and a four-port approach was used to perform a laparoscopic right partial nephrectomy using a diode laser (23 W) without hilar occlusion. The pigs were allowed to recover and 2 weeks later underwent a left laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Postoperatively, renal function was monitored by serial serum creatinine measurements. Both kidneys and ureters were removed for ex-vivo retrograde pyelograms and histologic analysis. RESULTS: The 980-nm diode laser resulted in successful lower-pole partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion in all 10 of the kidneys. In three cases, laser hemostasis was insufficient, and adjunctive hemostatic clips were necessary to stop bleeding. The mean operative time was 126 minutes, and the mean laser time was 84 minutes. An average of 23% (range 13%-33%) of the kidney parenchyma was resected. The mean blood loss was 150 mL (range 50-300 mL). There was no evidence of urinary extravasation on ex-vivo retrograde pyelograms at 2 weeks in any of the kidneys. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar occlusion using the 980-nm diode laser is feasible in the porcine model. Because adjunctive hemostatic measures may be necessary in some cases, clinical trials in humans should be limited to small exophytic tumors.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Laparoscopy-assisted live donor nephrectomy: a modified cost-effective approach for developing countries.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because of the prohibitive cost of laparoscopic disposable instruments such as the PneumoSleeve, Endocatch, and vascular staples, laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy has not gained wide acceptance in many developing countries. To circumvent this problem, we have developed a cost-saving approach, which is described herein and compared with the open method. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-nine patients underwent laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy at our institute, of which two were performed by the hand-assisted technique, five by the technique described by Fabrizio et al and forty-two by our modified cost-saving laparoscopy-assisted technique (LD). The latter patients were compared with 50 patients who had a standard open donor nephrectomy (OD) through a rib-resecting (12th rib) flank incision. Our technique is similar to the procedure described by Fabrizio et al except for a 6- to 8-cm incision placed in the subcostal region to retrieve the kidney after the renal vessels are cut and ligated as in the open procedure. The costs of the various techniques at our institute were compared. RESULTS: The LD and OD groups were similar in terms of age, weight, side of nephrectomy, and number of renal vessels. The operative time was longer in the LD group than in the OD group (180.7 +/- 18 minutes v 101.5 +/- 10.4 minutes), whereas the mean intraoperative blood loss was less (85.5 +/- 21.35 v 220 +/- 22.5 mL; P < 0.001). Warm ischemia time and recipient outcomes were comparable in the two groups. Patients in the LD group had lower postoperative narcotic (tramadol hydrochloride) requirement (155.3 +/- 53.3 mg v 251.8 +/- 63.1 mg; P < 0.001) and earlier discharge from the hospital (3.14 v 5.7 days; P < 0.001). The mean expense incurred was US$175 v US$160 in the LD and OD groups, respectively. The cost of the hand-assisted and standard laparoscopic techniques was significantly higher than that of our modified technique. CONCLUSIONS: Our modified technique of laparoscopy-assisted live-donor nephrectomy avoids the use of costly disposables yet offers the advantages of lesser morbidity and small incision of LD. It is cost effective and is an alternative to open nephrectomy in the developing world.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Comparison of changes in tissue oxidative-stress markers in experimental model of open, laparoscopic, and retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the oxidative stress in renal tissue during three types of surgery: open donor nephrectomy (ODN), laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), and retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). The aim was to find out which is the appropriate procedure for harvesting a donor kidney. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four New Zealand White rabbits were randomized to four groups, each consisting of six rabbits. Group I (control) was subjected to 180 minutes of anesthesia, and transperitoneal nephrectomy was performed without creation of warm ischemia. In group II (ODN), after 180 minutes of anesthesia, warm ischemia was created for 5 minutes, and nephrectomy was performed. Group III (LDN) was subjected to 5 minutes of warm ischemia after 180 minutes of pneumoperitoneum at 12 mm Hg, and the kidney was removed. In group IV (RDN), after pneumoretroperitoneum at 12 mm Hg for 180 minutes, warm ischemia was created for 5 minutes, and nephrectomy was performed. Renal tissues were analyzed to determine malondialdehyde (MDA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) as oxidative-stress markers. RESULTS: Renal tissue GSH levels were decreased, whereas MDA levels were increased in groups II through IV compared with the control group (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the ODN, LDN, and RDN groups in the renal oxidative-stress markers. CONCLUSION: No differences were detected in oxidative-stress markers in renal tissue samples between ODN, LDN, and RDN. Therefore, we believe LDN and RDN can be used for live donor kidney harvesting as effectively as ODN without creating greater oxidative stress, which can have deleterious effects on a donor kidney.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy.

Laparoscopic nephrectomy with ablative intent has been performed clinically. The current study aimed to determine whether a physiologically and anatomically intact kidney suitable for transplantation could be harvested laparoscopically. Three weeks after an ablative laparoscopic right nephrectomy, 15 pigs were divided into two groups: the study group (n = 10) underwent a laparoscopic live-donor left nephrectomy of the solitary kidney and conventional autotransplantation; the control group (n = 5) underwent an open live-donor left nephrectomy of the solitary kidney and conventional autotransplantation. All study kidneys underwent laparoscopic in situ hypothermic perfusion. The mean length of the left renal artery and vein were similar in the study and control groups: 3.1 cm and 3.4 cm, respectively, in the study group compared with 2.5 cm and 3.8 cm, respectively, in the control group (P = 0.5). No intraoperative renal vascular injuries or postoperative ureteral complications were noted in either group. Renal histopathologic examination immediately after live-donor nephrectomy and at 1 month post-transplant showed similar findings in the two groups. The mean serum creatinine at 7 and 30 days postoperatively was not significantly different: 2.1 mg/dL and 1.6 mg/dL, respectively, in the study group and 1.7 mg/dL, and 1.4 mg/dL, respectively, in the control group (P = 0.4). We conclude that laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy can be performed safely and reproducibly in the porcine model.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed1998

Organ retrieval systems for endoscopic nephrectomy: a comparative study.

Laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic interventions such as nephrectomy or tumor nephrectomy call for the removal of large quantities of tissue, which can no longer be extracted via the relatively confined lumen of a cannula. For this purpose, a variety of organ retrieval systems have been designed and are commercially available with the aim of safe tissue retrieval. This paper summarizes the results of an experimental and clinical comparison of the most important organ entrapment systems suitable for endoscopic nephrectomy. The LapSacs was the first organ bag especially designed for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Despite various new modifications of this entrapment system, it still represents one of the best alternatives and has been used worldwide with success. However, because of its simplicity, it requires a certain laparoscopic expertise and involves a learning curve. Newly developed retrieval systems (i.e., LapBag, Extraction Bag, Endo-Catch) offer some advantages regarding the handling of the bag, which may be particularly useful during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with a restricted working space. Retrieval systems (i.e., Endobag, Endopouch) with low resistance to tearing forces or permeability to tumor cells or bacteria (i.e., Espiner Bag) cannot be recommended for endoscopic nephrectomy.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Cytokine response to surgical stress: comparison of pure laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and open nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery has been shown to induce less immune suppression than open surgery, presumably because there is less tissue trauma, a factor that may impact oncologic-disease control. The objective of this study was to compare the cytokine and stress response associated with pure laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL), and open nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen female farm pigs (45-50 kg) underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic, handassisted (HAL), or open nephrectomy (N = 5 in each group). At 1, 4, 24, and 48 hours post-nephrectomy, blood and peritoneal fluid samples were collected for measurement of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha, interleukin (IL)-1beta, and IL-6 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Body temperature and serum glucose and cortisol were also measured. RESULTS: No evidence of perioperative infection was detected in any animal through temperature and glucose monitoring. Operating time and blood loss were comparable among the three groups. Peak serum cortisol concentrations were significantly higher in the HAL group than in the pure laparoscopic group at 24 hours (P = 0.02). Serum TFNalpha concentrations were significantly lower in the pure laparoscopy group (40 +/- 6 pg/mL) than in the HAL and open-nephrectomy groups (81 +/- 6 pg/mL and 83 +/- 17 pg/mL, respectively; P < 0.05), although no differences between groups were found in the serum IL-1beta and IL-6 concentrations. Peritoneal IL-1beta was significantly higher in the HAL than in the open-nephrectomy group (2993 +/- 507 pg/mL and 733 +/- 185 pg/mL, respectively; P = 0.05). Peritoneal IL-6 was significantly lower in the pure laparoscopy group (694 +/- 234 pg/mL) than in the open-surgery group (1668 +/- 312 pg/mL) (P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Pure laparoscopic surgery in pigs elicits a less-robust cytokine response than HAL or open nephrectomy with respect to serum TNFalpha and peritoneal IL-6 concentrations, perhaps reflecting less impairment of the immune system. Clinical confirmation is required, and the implications with regard to oncologic tumor surveillance in humans require further study.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Hem-o-lok clips for vascular control during laparoscopic ablative nephrectomy: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Vascular control is an important step in laparoscopic nephrectomy. The various options are titanium clips, Hem-o-lok clips (Weck Closure Systems, Research Triangle Park, NC), T-knot, and stapling devices. We report our experience with the use of Hem-o-lok clips. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2001 to June 2004, 246 laparoscopic ablative nephrectomies (178 simple; 68 radical) were performed at our institute for benign and malignant conditions. All patients (mean age 46.76+/-26.31 years) were evaluated by detailed history and physical examination and laboratory investigations and underwent standard transperitoneal (N=204) or retroperitoneal (N=42) nephrectomy. Venous and arterial control was obtained using Hem-o-lock clips. In cases where the clips could not be applied directly on the renal vein, various maneuvers were employed to secure the occlusion. The features compared were the number of clips used, safety, cost, and requirement for blood transfusion. RESULTS: Conversion to an open procedure was required in 36 patients (28 in the transperitoneal group and 8 in the retroperitoneal group). The mean operative time was 280+/-35 minutes and 235+/-44 minutes in the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal groups, respectively. In all cases, arterial and venous control was achieved by application of two Hem-o-lok clips on the patient side. Blood transfusion was required by 7.2% of the patients (right-side nephrectomy 4.6%; left side nephrectomy 2.6%), but none was attributable to clip-related complication. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.4 days. CONCLUSION: Hem-o-lok clips are a reliable and cost-effective means of achieving vascular control during laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Laparoscopic or open surgery for living donor nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The anterior extraperitoneal approach for living donor nephrectomy has been used in more than 700 living cases in the unit and proved to be safe for the donor. In 1998, laparoscopic nephrectomy was introduced as an option when technically feasible. We found it essential to investigate the consequences of the new technique. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred living donor kidney transplantations were performed from 1998 to June 2000, 45 with laparoscopic, 55 with open nephrectomy. The donors took part in a structured interview 4 weeks after the donation and their responses were categorized in three classes. RESULTS: In each group, one recipient had delayed initial function. The serum creatinine levels after 3 and 7 days or the GFR values after 6 months did not differ. One graft has been lost following laparoscopic nephrectomy and four after open surgery. For the laparoscopy donors, the median number of post-operative days in hospital was 5.0 days (range 2-9), vs 6.0 (4-8) after open surgery (NS). The requirement of opoid analgesics post-operatively was 5.0 doses (1-22) vs 6.0 (1-38) (P=0.02); and after 4 weeks, 23 of 45 laparoscopic donors were free of pain vs eight of 55 open nephrectomy donors (P=0.0004). Approximately one-third of all donors felt some restriction of physical activity and the majority complained of impaired physical energy. There were no differences between the groups. The duration of sick-leave after laparoscopic surgery was median 6 (2-19) weeks vs 7 (1-16) (NS). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic nephrectomy is safe. Less post-operative pain is a definite advantage for the donor.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with nephrectomy, interleukin-2 and cytokine-primed or CD8(+) selected tumor infiltrating lymphocytes from primary tumor.

PURPOSE: Metastatic renal cell carcinoma is a disease with a mean survival of 6 to 10 months. Interleukin-2 (IL-2), the only approved therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma, is associated with a 14% response rate and durable remissions in some patients with high performance status. We performed a series of trials of IL-2 plus tumor infiltrating lymphocyte cell therapy and report the clinical results from 62 patients enrolled in these trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had metastatic renal cell carcinoma with the primary tumor in place and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were treated with cytokines before nephrectomy and preparation of cytokine primed tumor infiltrating lymphocytes or CD8(+) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes were isolated for infusion into patients. Of 62 patients enrolled 55 were treated with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and IL-2, and were evaluable for toxicity, response and survival. RESULTS: There were no postoperative mortalities. Of the patients 7 (11%) could not undergo systemic therapy. No unexpected IL-2 related toxicities or significant toxicities related to cell infusion were noted. Overall 5 patients (9.1%) achieved a complete response and 14 (25.5%) achieved a partial response. The responses were durable with a median duration of 14 months (range 0.8+ to 64+). The actuarial survival was 65% at 1 year and 43% at 2 years from the time of nephrectomy, with an overall median survival for all patients of 22 months (range 2 to 70+). The median survival for the responding patients has not yet been reached (range 2 to 63+). CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that immunotherapy with radical nephrectomy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and IL-2 provides substantial clinical benefit in the majority of patients. Component cellular therapy with enriched cell fractions allows the administration of a more standardized cell product. The present results with nephrectomy, tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and IL-2 are encouraging, and a randomized clinical trial of nephrectomy, CD8(+) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, plus IL-2 versus nephrectomy and IL-2 alone is currently in progress.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

The influence of nephrectomy of the primary allograft on retransplant graft outcome in the cyclosporine era.

The present analysis was undertaken to evaluate the influence of primary allograft nephrectomies on the early function, incidence of rejection, and short-term graft survival of subsequent renal retransplants. Among 95 consecutive cyclosporine treated retransplant recipients, 52 were retransplanted without primary allograft nephrectomy; 35 had removal of their primary grafts prior to retransplantation for fever and graft tenderness (30 patients) and persistent hematuria (5 patients); and 8 patients had an elective primary graft nephrectomy at the time of retransplantation. Demographic characteristics and immunosuppressive regimens were otherwise similar in all three groups. Nephrectomy of the primary allograft prior to retransplantation was associated with a significant subsequent rise in preformed cytotoxic antibody levels (57% having PRA greater than 30% compared with 33% in those with retention of primary grafts), a significantly higher incidence of delayed graft function among retransplants (63% compared with 30% in those who did not undergo primary allograft nephrectomy) and a trend toward decreased allograft survival in the subgroup who lost their primary allografts in the first year posttransplant. The incidence of acute rejection and 3-year posttransplant renal function in retransplants were not, however, influenced by nephrectomy of the primary allograft.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for cancer with level I renal vein involvement.

PURPOSE: Venous involvement develops in 5% to 10% of patients with renal cell carcinoma and is generally considered a relative contraindication to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. To our knowledge we report the initial clinical series of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma associated with level I renal vein thrombus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At our 2 institutions 8 patients each underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for level I microscopic renal vein thrombus (group 1) and level I gross thrombus (group 2). In all 8 group 2 patients the level I thrombus was preoperatively diagnosed by computerized tomography. Mean renal tumor size in groups 1 and 2 was 7.8 and 12.4 cm., respectively. After controlling the renal artery the renal vein was secured by firing an endoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis stapler on its collapsed, uninvolved proximal part adjacent to the vena cava. Intraoperative, postoperative and pathological parameters were assessed in the 2 groups. RESULTS: In group 1 laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was technically successful in all 8 patients. Mean operative time was 3.1 hours, mean estimated blood loss was 382 cc and mean hospital stay was 1.9 days. In 1 patient each a soft tissue and a vascular margin was positive for cancer. At a mean follow up of 19.5 months (range 2 to 36) metastatic disease occurred in 3 cases (38%). In group 2 laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was technically successful in 7 cases with open conversion in 1. Mean operative time was 3.3 hours, mean estimated blood loss was 354 cc and mean hospital stay was 2.3 days. Surgical soft tissue and the renal vein vascular margin of the transected vein were negative for cancer in all 8 cases. At a mean followup of 9.4 months (range 5 to 16) pulmonary metastasis developed in 1 patient (13%). CONCLUSIONS: Although it is an advanced procedure, laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in patients with level I renal vein thrombus is feasible, safe and follows established oncological principles.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Laparoscopic ice slush renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy: the initial experience.

PURPOSE: We describe a novel technique of laparoscopic renal hypothermia with intracorporeal ice slush during partial nephrectomy as well as clinical experience with the initial 12 patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 select patients with an infiltrating renal tumor who were candidates for nephron sparing surgery underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with renal hypothermia. An Endocatch II (United States Surgical Corp., Norwalk, Connecticut) bag was placed around the mobilized kidney and its drawstring was cinched around the intact renal hilum. The renal artery and vein were occluded en bloc with a Satinsky clamp. The bottom of the engaged bag was retrieved through a 12 mm port site and opened, and ice slush was introduced within the bag to completely surround the kidney. After renal hypothermia was achieved laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was performed by duplicating open surgical techniques. Renal parenchymal temperature was measured using a thermocouple needle in 5 patients. Median tumor size was 3.2 cm (range 1.5 to 5.5), 6 tumors (50%) were central in location and an imperative indication for partial nephrectomy was present in 7 patients (58%). RESULTS: All procedures were successfully completed laparoscopically without open conversion. Median time to deploy the bag around the kidney was 7 minutes (range 5 to 20), the median volume of ice slush introduced was 600 cc (range 300 to 750) and the time needed to insert the ice slush was 4 minutes (range 3 to 10). Median blood loss was 200 cc, total ischemia time was 43.5 minutes (range 25 to 55) and total operative time was 4.3 hours (range 3 to 5.5). Nadir renal parenchymal temperature was 5C to 19C and the mean decrease in systemic temperature was 0.6C. Histopathology confirmed renal cell carcinoma in 11 patients (92%), of whom all had negative surgical margins. Intraoperative complications occurred in 2 initial patients, including partial bag slippage in 1 and Satinsky clamp malfunction in 1. Postoperatively renal scan confirmed a functioning ipsilateral kidney in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge we present the initial clinical report of laparoscopic renal hypothermia for partial nephrectomy. By replicating standard open surgical practice our intracorporeal ice slush technique has the potential to extend the scope of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to more complicated renal tumors.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Subcostal versus transcostal mini donor nephrectomy: is rib resection responsible for pain related donor morbidity.

PURPOSE: Conventional donor nephrectomy is associated with significant postoperative morbidity. Whether this morbidity is associated with rib resection or a long incision is not clear. We designed a prospective randomized study of subcostal and transcostal mini incision donor nephrectomy and compared the results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed 82 donor nephrectomies in the study period of December 2000 to July 2001. Open donor nephrectomies were randomized to subcostal (25) or transcostal (24) mini incision techniques. Results were compared and analyzed using the independent t test. RESULTS: The subcostal and transcostal groups were comparable in terms of patient age, body mass index, nephrectomy side, number of renal vessels and incision length (9.32 vs 9.72 cm). Patients in the subcostal group had a lesser postoperative analgesic requirement (304 +/- 49.8 vs 487 +/- 74.1 mg, p = 0.0001), shorter hospital stay (2.36 +/- 0.7 vs 3.71 +/- 0.81 days, p = 0.0001) and early convalescence (26.56 +/- 4.06 vs 37.46 +/- 6.05 days) compared with the transcostal group. Warm ischemia time and recipient outcome were similar in the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Rib sparing, subcostal mini incision donor nephrectomy has significantly less morbidity and a shorter hospital stay compared with the rib resection transcostal technique.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy: prospective evaluation of the learning curve.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic nephrectomy (LN) has recently become an emerging standard for extirpative surgery of the kidney. LN has historically proven to have a steep learning curve with longer operative times until a surgeon gains adequate laparoscopic experience. Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) is fast becoming a commonly used procedure to remove kidneys as it may have a reduced learning curve compared to standard LN. To date no prospective studies have evaluated the learning curve of HALN with regard to improvements in operative times and technical difficulty. We prospectively evaluated the learning curve for HALN in a residency training program as it compares to open nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HALN was performed in 30 consecutive patients for various indications. The senior urology resident functioned as the primary surgeon and the same attending surgeon was present throughout all cases. All participating residents had to have performed at least 15 open nephrectomies to serve as an internal, personal reference. Difficulty scores were obtained at the completion of the case from the resident surgeon comparing HALN to open nephrectomy, which ranged from 1 to 5. Operative times, estimated blood losses and lengths of stay were obtained at the time of surgery and hospitalization. RESULTS: Median difficulty score was equivalent to open nephrectomy for the first case but decreased significantly by case 4 (p = 0.0006). Median operative times decreased significantly from 178 minutes in the first cases to 85 minutes by case 6 (p = 0.0002). Estimated blood loss and length of hospitalization did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: HALN has a relatively short learning curve reflected by the rapid decrease in difficulty scores and operative times by case 4. Similar results may be expected when training practicing urologists to perform HALN.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 6-year experience.

PURPOSE: We determined whether the results of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy warranted expansion of the availability of the technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Donor and recipient charts for 738 consecutive laparoscopic living donor nephrectomies have been reviewed. RESULTS: Renal donors were 69% white race and 57% female. Age range was 18 to 74 years. Neither age nor obesity alone were exclusionary criteria. Nephrectomy was left sided in 96%. Donors with body mass index greater than 33 had longer operative times. The extraction site changed from umbilical to suprapubic during the series. Warm ischemia time was 169 seconds. Conversion to open nephrectomy occurred in 1.6% of cases and blood transfusion was required in 1.2%. Major intraoperative complications occurred in 6.8% and major postoperative complications occurred in 17.1% of cases. Hospitalization lasted 64.4 hours. Postoperative donor creatinine was 1.5 times the preoperative level. Recipient serum creatinine averaged 2.0 mg% at 1 week and 1.6 mg% at 1 year. Delayed graft function occurred in 2.6%. However, 9.1% of recipients did not achieve a serum creatinine less than 3.0 mg% within 7 days. The endovascular stapler also created 37 extra arteries for implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Risks of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to the donor must not be minimized. Rapid conversion to open surgery to control bleeding may be necessary. Nonvascular intraoperative injuries require recognition. Slow bowel function recovery prolongs hospitalization and may indicate unrecognized pancreatitis or small bowel herniation. Surgical technique and complication management have improved. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is now routine but still requires an intense level of attention to prevention of complications.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Partial nephrectomy with fibrin glue repair: measurement of vascular and pelvicaliceal hydrodynamic bond integrity in a live and abbatoir porcine model.

PURPOSE: Some of the challenges during partial nephrectomy include control of bleeding and repair of the pelvicaliceal system. Fibrin tissue sealants have recently been used to achieve hemostasis and collecting system closure in open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. However, there exist little data regarding the intrinsic strength of the bond, especially when applied to the vasculature and the urinary collecting system of the transected kidney. We examined the hydrodynamic bond integrity of a commercially available fibrin tissue sealant in a live porcine animal model undergoing partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open partial nephrectomy was performed in 19 porcine renal units. Collecting system entry was confirmed by methylene blue instillation into the proximal ureter. Fibrin tissue sealant was used to repair 16 renal units, that is 8 kidneys hardened in vivo for 10 minutes and 8 hardened in vivo for 60 minutes. In an additional 3 renal units monopolar electrocautery was used to achieve hemostasis (no fibrin glue used). The strength of vasculature repair was performed by infusing saline into the renal artery (renal vein ligated) and measuring pressure at bond rupture. Similarly the integrity of pelvicaliceal repair was evaluated by retrograde infusion of saline into the collecting system via the proximal ureter and measurement of pressure at bond rupture. RESULTS: Fibrin tissue sealant was successful in achieving prompt hemostasis and it was subjectively superior to cautery alone with regard to bleeding control. Mean renal vascular and pelvicaliceal burst pressure for fibrin sealant treated kidneys was 378 (median 420) and 166 mm Hg (median 170), respectively. There was no significant difference in 10 vs 60-minute hardening times in treated kidneys. In comparison, vascular and pelvicaliceal burst pressure for nontreated (cautery alone) kidneys was 230 (median 220) and 87 mm Hg (median 90), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Commercially available fibrin tissue sealants can provide supraphysiological renal parenchyma and collecting system sealing pressures after partial nephrectomy. This information supports the potential use of fibrin sealants during open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Abattoirs↗

PubMed2004

Should retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy be the standard of care for benign nonfunctioning kidneys? An outcome analysis based on experience with 449 cases in a 5-year period.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic nephrectomy has become a routine procedure at specialized centers with the advantages of less postoperative pain, minimal scars, rapid recovery and short convalescence. We report our experience with the establishment of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy as the standard of care for benign nonfunctioning kidneys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared the records of patients who underwent simple nephrectomy retroperitoneoscopically or by open surgery from January 1998 to October 2003 at our center. RESULTS: A total of 351 simple nephrectomies were done retroperitoneoscopically, while 83 were done as an open procedure. Mean operative time was significantly longer in the retroperitoneoscopic group. However, mean blood loss, complication rate, hospital stay and convalescence were significantly less in the retroperitoneoscopic group. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy has become a standardized procedure. It should be offered as the primary treatment modality to patients with benign renal disease scheduled for elective nephrectomy except in those in whom it is contraindicated.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗