PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “PROLACTIN”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

Internalization of prolactin receptor and prolactin in transfected cells does not involve nuclear translocation.

Prolactin (PRL) interacts with a specific, well characterized plasma membrane receptor (PRLR) that is coupled to signal transduction pathways involving Jak2, Fyn, and MAP kinases, and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT). Although a few previous studies have indicated nuclear translocation of PRL in IL-2 stimulated T lymphocytes, PRL-dependent Nb2 lymphoma cell lines and 235-1 lactotrophs, the mechanisms of nuclear targeting remain unknown and conflicting results have been reported concerning the putative nuclear translocation of the PRLR. We therefore decided to investigate nuclear translocation of PRLR and PRL in various cell lines transfected with an expression plasmid encoding PRLR, using confocal laser microscopy. We have constructed various cDNAs of the long and short forms of the rat PRLR containing an oligonucleotide encoding a Flag epitope inserted either just before the N-terminal amino acid or in the C-terminal end of the mature receptor (named N-terminal or C-terminal Flag-tagged PRLR). The corresponding receptors function as the PRLR in transfected cells: they are expressed at the plasma membrane and in compartments of the secretory pathway, they bind PRL with normal affinity (Kd= 4x10(-10) M) and have the same capacity to stimulate the transcriptional activity of a milk protein (beta-casein) gene as wild-type PRLR. In addition, the tagged receptors are much more efficiently immunodetected using anti-Flag antibodies, as compared to anti-PRL antibodies (U5 or U6). Immunofluorescence combined with detailed confocal laser microscopy showed that addition of PRL (0 to 12 hours) to COS-7, CHO and NIH-3T3 transfected fibroblasts induces rapid internalization of the receptor (long form), without any translocation to the nucleus. Using PRL-R tagged both in the N-terminal or C-terminal regions of the mature receptor excludes the possibility of a cleaved fragment which could have been subsequently imported into the nucleus. An absence of nuclear translocation of PRLR was also observed in a 293 cell line stably expressing the receptor, and in physiological targets for PRL, i.e. in Nb2 lymphoma cells expressing the Nb2 form of the receptor or in BGME mammary gland epithelial cells upon overexpression of a Flag-tagged PRLR. Similarly, the short form of the PRLR was not detected in nuclei of transfected COS cells upon PRL treatment. Clearly, our results provide evidence that internalization of the plasma membrane PRLR does not lead to nuclear translocation of the receptor, or part of it, in most fibroblasts and epithelial cells at physiological concentrations of PRL. Also, in co-localization experiments, PRL was internalized without nuclear translocation. Activation of STATs transcription factors and MAP kinases, as well as translocation of these proteins to the nucleus following their phosphorylation, probably remains the intracellular mechanism coupling stimulation to nuclear events.

3T3 Cells↗

Structural and functional effects of high prolactin levels on injured endothelial cells: evidence for an endothelial prolactin receptor.

Stress has been linked to health problems such as atherosclerosis and prolonged wound healing, which involve the responses of injured endothelial cells. Though prolactin (PRL) levels become increased during the physiological response to stress, the significance and effects of these increases are largely unknown. Here we examined the effects of elevated, though physiological, concentrations of PRL on the responses of cultured endothelial cells after mechanical injury to cell monolayers. When treated at the time of injury with PRL levels of 62.5-1000 ng/mL, cells at the wound front became abnormal in shape and had reductions in f-actin staining in comparison to controls that were not PRL-treated. High PRL concentrations also inhibited the adhesion of cells to their growth surface in a dose-dependent manner. Using rhodamine-labeled PRL, we observed specific PRL uptake by these cells that suggested the presence of a PRL receptor. Finally, mRNA for the long form of the PRL receptor was detected by RT-PCR. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that (1) high PRL concentrations alter the actin cytoskeleton and adhesion of injured endothelial cells and (2) endothelial cells express the transcript for the PRL receptor. Thus, we report novel effects of PRL that may be mediated by activation of an endothelial cell PRL receptor.

Actins↗

Prolactin and 16K prolactin stimulate release of vasopressin by a direct effect on hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal system.

Activity of the magnocellular neurons that synthesize vasopressin and oxytocin in the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei of the hypothalamus can be modulated by local release of neuromediators within the nuclei. Among the bioactive peptides that may play autocrine or paracrine roles in this system is prolactin (PRL). Paraventricular and supraoptic neurons express PRL mRNA and contain and secrete PRL-like proteins of 23 and 14 kDa. We investigated the localization of PRL receptors in vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic magnocellular neurons using dual-label immunofluorescence. The results demonstrate that both vasopressin- and oxytocin-immunoreactive cells of the paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei contain the PRL receptor. In addition, we investigated the possible regulation of vasopressin secretion by PRL using hypothalamo-neurohypophyseal explants in culture. The results show that PRL and a 16 kDa N-terminal fragment of the hormone that is analogous to the neurohypophyseal 14-kDa PRL fragment stimulate the release of vasopressin. Together, these findings support the hypothesis that vasopressinergic and oxytocinergic neurons of the magnocellular secretory system are regulated directly by various isoforms of PRL via autocrine/paracrine mechanisms.

Animals↗

Prolactin-dependent growth and gamma-casein gene expression in Ba/F3 cells transfected with a long form of mouse mammary prolactin receptor.

Complementary DNA (cDNA) encoding a long form of prolactin receptor (PRL-RL) was cloned from mouse mammary gland by PCR using primers designed from the noncoding regions of previously reported rat ovarian PRL-RL cDNA. The nucleotide sequence encoding the extracellular and transmembrane domains of PRL-RL is completely identical to that of short forms of mouse PRL-R. The amino acid sequence deduced from the nucleotide sequence of mouse PRL-RL is 91% identical to that of rat PRL-RL. To address the question of whether or not the cloned mouse PRL-RL cDNA encodes a functional PRL-RL we transfected Ba/F3 IL-3-dependent murine pro-B lymphoid cells with the cDNA. By culturing the transfected cells in a medium which contained PRL in place of IL-3, we selected 5 PRL-dependent clones. All of these PRL-dependent clones, BaF/PD cells, expressed PRL-RL mRNA. In addition, BaF/PD cells expressed mammary-specific gamma-casein mRNA in response to PRL and dexamethasone. Based on these results, it was concluded that the mouse mammary PRL-RL cDNA cloned in this study is functionally active in mediating both PRL-dependent growth and mammary-specific gene expression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Prolactin binding analysis and immunohistochemical localization of prolactin receptor in porcine ovarian cells.

In the present study we searched for prolactin receptor (PRL-R) in porcine ovarian theca tissue (Tc) of small, medium and large follicles, as well as in early corpus luteum (ECL). The objectives of this investigation were: 1) comparison of the direct effect of PRL action on progesterone (P4) and estradiol (E2) secretion from Tc and ECL cells in culture with adequate effects caused by luteinizing hormone (LH). 2) detection of the presence and distribution of PRL-R in thecal tissue of porcine follicles and in ECL. Tissues were cultured as monolayers either in control M199 medium with calf serum or in medium either with PRL (100 ng/ml) or with LH (100 ng/ml). After 2 days in vitro cultured media were assayed for steroid concentrations by radioimmunoassays. Content and distribution of PRL-R were evaluated by Scatchard analysis and by an immunohistochemical assay. Separated theca layers as well as fragments of ECL were excised on dry ice, homogenized, and incubated with [125I]-PRL. PRL stimulated P4 secretion from Tc 10-fold versus controls. LH stimulated P4 secretion only 2.5-fold. E2 secretion was stimulated by PRL 2.7-fold and by LH 2.4-fold. LH enhanced P4 secretion from ECL cells by 18% while PRL increased P4 secretion by as much as 73%. Femtomol amounts of PRL-R protein were detected in theca tissues of medium and large follicles and also in ECL, which was in accordance with immunohistochemical results. The results showed for the first time the presence of PRL-R in porcine Tc and ECL.

Animals↗

Interaction between prolactin and rabbit mammary prolactin receptor in the presence of environment-modifying agents.

The binding assay of prolactin (PRL) to the receptor in the rabbit mammary gland was carried out with varying concentrations of NaCl, KCl, CaCl2, MgCl2, glycerol, glucose, sucrose and urea. The agents did not affect the binding capacity. The ionic bond-breaking agents (NaCl and KCl) had little effect on changes in the association rate constant (k+1) of PRL binding to the receptor and the dissociation rate constant (k-1) of bound PRL. The inclusion of other agents changed the k+1 and the k-1. Among the agents examined, chaotropic salts (CaCl2 and MgCl2) inhibited the binding of PRL greatly, and were the most effective in decreasing the k+1. Both hydrogen- and hydrophobic bonds are involved in the interaction between PRL and the receptor. The data suggest that hydrophobic bonding is primarily an important force participating in the binding of PRL to its receptor.

Animals↗

Prolactin induces an inward current through voltage-independent Ca2+ channels in Chinese hamster ovary cells stably expressing prolactin receptor.

There is still only limited understanding of the early steps of prolactin (PRL) signal transduction in target cells. Recent studies have identified some of the essential first steps: these include the rapid association of the PRL receptor with JAK tyrosine kinases and tyrosine phosphorylation of a number of proteins, including members of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stats) family. On the other hand, binding of PRL to its receptor is rapidly followed by calcium influx. However, PRL-induced ionic events and the related ionic channels involved have not been clearly established. This work was undertaken to characterise the channels responsible for calcium influx and to obtain an insight into their activation processes. Using the patch-clamp technique in the cell-attached configuration, single Ca2+ channel currents were recorded following PRL application (10 nM) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably expressing PRL receptor (CHO-E32). Statistical analysis showed that the recorded currents were voltage-independent, with a slope conductance of 16 pS. Although these channels were present in excised patches, the fact that PRL was unable to activate them suggested that a soluble cytoplasmic component may be required. Application of the purified inositol phosphate, Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (2 microM), to the inside of the excised patch membrane activated the voltage-independent 16 pS Ca2+ channel. The open probability (Popen) was enhanced. The inositol phosphates Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P5 and Ins(1,4,5)P3 did not affect channel activity while InsP6 (20 microM) had some effect, although less marked than that of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4. Using the anion-exchange HPLC technique, we then studied the effects of PRL (10 nM) on the turnover of inositol phosphates (InsPs) in CHO-E32. Our studies showed that PRL induces rapid increases in the production of Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 (207% at 30 s), InsP5 (171% at 30 s), and InsP6 (241% at 30 s). Conversely, Ins(1,4,5)P3 showed a transient decrease at 5 s, accompanied by a concomitant increase in Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, suggesting that the former could be transiently phosphorylated to produce the latter. Comparison of the production kinetics of Ins(1,4,5)P3, Ins(1,3,4,5)P4, InsP5, and InsP6 indicated the possibility of additional metabolic routes which have yet to be determined. This study suggests that PRL promotes Ca2+ entry through voltage-independent Ca2+ channels that may be activated by Ins(1,3,4,5)P4 and InsP6.

Animals↗

Rapidly reversible binding of rabbit prolactin to the rabbit prolactin receptor accounts for the differences between homologous and heterologous binding.

The binding of radioiodinated rabbit (rb) prolactin (PRL) to rabbit mammary membranes is low and its affinity constant, 0.02 nM-1, calculated from heterologous inhibition assays, is about 300 times lower than that of ovine (o) PRL. Although the differences between homologous and heterologous binding are well documented in different species, the reasons for such differences are still unknown. Here we show that the low affinity of rbPRL for the native receptor does not affect its in vitro bioactivity compared with that of oPRL. We also show that rbPRL displays high specific binding to the baculovirus-expressed recombinant receptor and further establish that its lower affinity for binding to the homologous receptor is due to its faster and more complete dissociation compared with that of oPRL. Hormone binding affinity for full-length and carboxy-terminal truncated rbPRL receptor mutants expressed in mammalian or in baculovirus-infected cells was not affected by partial truncation of the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor, whereas the affinity for oPRL increased and that for rbPRL decreased upon truncation of both the cytoplasmic and membrane domains. The affinity of rbPRL for the native receptor is two orders of magnitude lower than that for the recombinant receptor. Affinity cross-linking and binding experiments showed that this difference in affinities is not related to selective cleavage of the native microsomal receptor during the binding reaction; however, this difference may be related to cell context-dependent differences in the oligomerization state of the receptor. Thus, obviously, the cloned receptor is alone sufficient for binding to rbPRL without requiring any receptor-associated protein. The lower affinity for rbPRL binding to its homologous receptor in comparison with higher affinity binding of oPRL to the same receptor is attributable to differences in their dissociation kinetics and in the conformational requirements of the receptor-hormone interaction site for binding to the two hormones.

Analysis of Variance↗

Exogenous prolactin stimulates mammary development and alters expression of prolactin-related genes in prepubertal gilts.

The goal of this project was to determine whether recombinant porcine (rp) prolactin (PRL) can enhance mammary development when given to pre-pubertal gilts and/or modify the expression of PRL-related genes. Crossbred gilts were injected s.c. twice daily with saline (CTRL; n = 13), 2 mg of rpPRL (4PRL; n = 13), or 4 mg of rpPRL (8PRL; n = 13) in a 2.0-mL volume for a period of 29 d, starting at 75.1 +/- 0.5 kg BW. Jugular blood samples were collected before the first injection, as well as 14 and 28 d later, and were assayed for PRL, IGF-I, and leptin. Gilts were slaughtered on d 29 of treatment, and mammary glands were collected for dissection of parenchymal and extraparenchymal tissues, and for determination of parenchymal DNA, DM, protein, and fat contents. Levels of mRNA for PRL, PRL receptor (PRL-R), and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT5A and STAT5B) were determined via real-time PCR in the mammary parenchyma, as well as levels for PRL and PRL-R in the pituitaries. Treatments did not alter plasma (P = 0.48) IGF-I. Serum concentrations of PRL at slaughter were greater (P < 0.01) in both 4PRL and 8PRL compared with CTRL, whereas at mid-treatment, they were greater (P < 0.05) only in 8PRL gilts. Parenchymal tissue weight and parenchymal DNA concentrations increased with exogenous rpPRL (P < 0.001). The percentage of protein in parenchyma increased (P < 0.001), whereas that of DM (P < 0.001), fat (P < 0.001), and the protein:DNA ratio (P < 0.05) decreased with exogenous rpPRL. Treatment differences were always observed between the 4 mg dose and CTRL, and no further differences were noted when the dose was increased to 8 mg daily. Expression levels of PRL, but not PRL-R, were decreased (P < 0.05) in anterior pituitary glands and mammary glands of treated gilts. The mRNA levels of STAT5A and STAT5B increased (P < 0.05) with exogenous rpPRL. It is evident from these data that rpPRL can stimulate mammogenesis in prepubertal gilts through hyperplasia and increased expression of PRL-related genes.

Animals↗

Prolactin and testicular Leydig cell function: characterization of prolactin receptors in the murine MA-10 testicular Leydig cell line.

The direct role of prolactin (PRL) in testicular function is still unclear, mostly because of lack of a suitable in vitro model. To establish the suitability of the MA-10 murine tumor Leydig cell line for the study of PRL receptors (PRLR) and effects on steroidogenesis, we initially characterized PRLR on cultured MA-10 cells. The specific binding (Bs) of [125I]human growth hormone (hGH) depends on time, temperature, and Mg2+ ion and protein concentrations, with absolute specificity for the lactogenic hormones hGH and ovine PRL. Bs is saturable and is to a single class of high-affinity (Ka = 3.6 x 10(9) M-1) low-capacity (Bmax = 19.5 fmol/mg protein) binding sites. The molecular weight of PRLR, determined by cross-linking to [125I]hGH, SDS-PAGE and autoradiography, is 35 kDa for the free receptor, suggesting that the short-form PRLR protein, previously described in liver and mammary glands, is that primarily found in MA-10 cells. Thus, the demonstration of specific PRL binding sites on MA-10 Leydig cells, with characteristics similar to primary Leydig cell PRLR, suggests that this cell line can serve as a good model for both the study of PRLR mechanism of action and the role of PRL in Leydig cell function.

Animals↗

Prolactin receptors on human T and B lymphocytes: antagonism of prolactin binding by cyclosporine.

Prolactin (PRL) receptors have been identified recently on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (MNC) and may be involved in the regulation of cell-mediated immunity. Cyclosporine (CsA), an immunosuppressive cyclic endecapeptide utilized to prolong graft survival in human organ transplant patients, affects PRL binding to MNC. At concentrations of CsA from 10(-10) through 10(-8) M, the amount of PRL bound to MNC markedly increased to ca. 400% of controls, whereas CsA concentrations of 10(-6) and 10(-5) M totally inhibited PRL binding to lymphocytes. The ability of low concentrations of CsA to enhance PRL binding was temperature-dependent and did not occur when binding assays were conducted at 4 degrees C. PRL displaced [3H]CsA from lymphocytes with ca. 50% displacement at 10(-9) M PRL and total displacement at concentrations of 10(-7), 10(-6), and 10(-5) M. Growth hormone did not displace [3H]CsA in similar experiments. CsA also did not alter the binding of a beta-receptor antagonist to MNC, again suggesting that CsA was specific in its antagonism of PRL binding. A CsA analog with no immunosuppressive action, cyclosporin H, did not alter PRL binding to MNC. Furthermore, PRL receptors were demonstrated on four cell lines of human and mouse origin. Finally, PRL receptors were identified on purified populations of T and B lymphocytes isolated from human spleens, and CsA again inhibited PRL binding at concentrations of 10(-7) and 10(-6) M. The presence of PRL receptors on T and B lymphocytes suggests that PRL may be involved in the regulation of humoral and cell-mediated immunity, and that one effect of CsA on immune function may be its ability to inhibit the effects of PRL action on these lymphocytes.

Animals↗

N-nitroso-N-methylurea-induced mammary tumors in the rat: role of prolactin and a prolactin-lowering drug.

Female outbred Sprague-Dawley rats bearing N-nitroso-N-methylurea (NMU)-induced mammary tumors received various endocrine therapies 3 months after the first NMU injection. Rats were divided into 5 groups (15-20 rats/group) and received a 4-week treatment as follows: group 1, controls; group 2, ovariectomized; group 3, 0.5 mg 2-bromoergocryptine (CB-154) injected so twice daily; group 4a, pituitary implant under the kidney capsule; and group 4b, CB-154 injected during the last 2 weeks of the experiment in rats bearing a pituitary implant. Castration of rats with established NMU-induced tumors resulted in a decrease in both tumor number and size, but these parameters again started to increase 3 weeks post castration. CB-154 failed to reduce the tumor number but did arrest the increase in tumor size. In the animals with a pituitary implant, both tumor number and tumor size increased progressively at a greater rate than in control animals, whereas the addition of CB-154 (group 4b) stabilized the tumor growth. Ovariectomy (OVX) resulted in a significant decline of steroid receptor levels. Prolactin (PRL) receptor levels were significantly stimulated by the pituitary implant, and CB-154 prevented this increase. The present studies confirmed that NMU-induced mammary tumors are less hormone-dependent (response to OVX) than 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA)-induced tumors. The role of PRL also appears to be less important, at least for established tumors, for NMU-induced mammary tumors than for DMBA-induced mammary tumors.

Animals↗

Prolactin induces rapid phosphorylation and activation of prolactin receptor-associated RAF-1 kinase in a T-cell line.

The receptor for prolactin (PRL) is a member of the hematopoietic receptor family that also includes the receptors for interleukins 2-7. PRL is synthesized and is secreted by human T lymphocytes and acts as a lymphokine necessary, but not sufficient, for T lymphocyte progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Although data now indicate that PRL serves an immunomodulatory role in vitro and in vivo, the mechanisms of PRL receptor signal transduction in T cells have not been defined. We demonstrate here that PRL induced the phosphorylation of the p72-74 serine/threonine kinase c-Raf-1 in the PRL-dependent rat T-cell line Nb2. Associated with this inducible phosphorylation of Raf-1 was a concentration- and time-dependent activation of in vitro Raf-1 autokinase and substrate kinase activities, which correlated with the PRL-induced proliferation of Nb2 cells. Co-immunoprecipitation studies revealed association of Raf-1 with PRL receptors in Nb2 cells. These results revealed that all isoforms of the PRL receptor (short, intermediate, and long) are expressed in Nb2 cells and associate with Raf-1. In contrast to the PRL-dependent Nb2 cells, phosphorylation and activation of Raf-1 were constitutive in the Nb2-derived, PRL-independent, T-cell line Sp. These studies demonstrate for the first time an association between the PRL receptor and a serine/threonine kinase affiliated with signal transduction.

Animals↗

Calcium and the secretory cycle of prolactin cells: a cytochemical and ultrastructural study of dopamine inhibition and monobutyryl cyclic AMP-stimulation of prolactin secretion.

To identify intracellular calcium pools that may be involved in the secretory process in prolactin (PRL) cells, hemi pituitaries were incubated in medium containing 10(-6) M dopamine, 5 mM cyclic cAMP (experimentals), or in medium alone (controls) and then processed for electron microscopy using potassium pyroantimonate to localize intracellular calcium. PRL in the medium was measured by radioimmunoassay. The concentration of antimonate associated with mitochondria, Golgi saccules, and secretory granules was estimated. Dopamine inhibition of PRL secretion (> 80% at 1, 2, 3 h) resulted in accumulation of secretory granules in all stages of maturation and dilation of Golgi saccules at 2 and 3 h, accompanied by increased mitochondria antimonate and increased Golgi-associated antimonate. Cyclic AMP stimulation of secretion (635% at 5 min., declining to 34% at 1 h) resulted in marked exocytosis at 5 and 15 min., declining after 30 min. Mitochondrial antimonate decreased after 30 min. Stimulated cells exhibited numerous coated membrane structures at or near exocytotic pits and an amassing of microvesicles at the margin of the Golgi apparatus. Although some secretory granules consistently exhibited reactivity to antimonate (unchanged by inhibition or stimulation), plasma membrane, and granule membrane translocated to the plasma membrane during exocytosis, were not reactive.

Animals↗

Characteristics of prolactin-modulated LH induction of LH/hCG receptors. Transient inhibition of receptor induction following prolactin exposure.

The temporal relationship between exposure to prolactin (PRL) and luteinizing hormone (LH) induction of LH receptors was investigated in hypophysectomized adult male rats. Testicular homogenate membrane preparations were incubated with [125I]hCG for analysis of LH/hCG binding. Seven days after hypophysectomy, the rats were injected with 100 micrograms/day of PRL for another 7 days and then given a single 10-micrograms dose of LH at 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, or 36 hours after the last PRL injection. The priming effect of PRL on LH induction of receptors was not observed if LH was administered 2 to 12 hours from the last PRL injection. However, after this inhibitory period, injections of LH to PRL-primed rats resulted in induction of LH receptors and the effect persisted for 36 hours. This study supports previous reports demonstrating a unique dependence upon PRL for LH up-regulation of the LH receptor and characterizes the brief refractory period following exposure to PRL.

Animals↗

Uneven regional distributions of prolactin- and growth hormone-secreting cells and sexually dimorphic proportions of prolactin secretors in the adenohypophysis of adult chickens.

Prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH) proteins are structurally similar and are thought to be evolutionarily derived from a common gene. In addition, data indicate that GH and PRL cells differentiate from a common stem cell. In adult birds, females have higher levels of serum PRL than males. Levels of serum GH are reported to be higher in young male birds than in females and equal between sexes in adult birds. Furthermore, previous studies using immunocytochemistry found that PRL- and GH-containing cells were located primarily in the cephalic (Cp) and caudal (Cd) lobes, respectively, of the anterior pituitary. Two experiments were conducted to study the cellular basis for differences in PRL and GH secretion between genders or anatomical location in adult chickens. In Experiment I, anterior pituitaries from broiler breeder adult hens and roosters were subjected to reverse hemolytic plaque assays (RHPA's) for PRL and GH. The percentage of of PRL-secreting cells was significantly greater in females than in males (46.1 +/- 4.5% and 26.1 +/- 2.4%, respectively; P < 0.001; n = 6). However, there were no significant differences between the proportions of GH-secreting cells between sexes (25.8 +/- 3.1% and 30.0 +/- 3.9% in females and males, respectively). Average area of plaques formed was different between sexes in GH plaque assays under basal conditions (162,465.9 +/- 29,911.8 microns 2 and 53.834.9 +/- 31,033.5 microns 2, for males and females, respective; P < 0.05). However, no differences were found in the presence of GH-releasing hormone. In Experiment II, anterior pituitaries from Leghorn hens were dissected into three regions: the extreme portions of the Cp and Cd lobes and the remaining or middle portion. The cells from each region were subjected to RHPA's for PRI and GH. We found that 52.0 +/- 4.1% of all cells from the Cp lobe secreted PRL. This proportion was greater (P < 0.01; n = 4) than that found in the Cd lobe, where 2.4 +/- 0.4% of all cells released PRL. In contrast, the percentage of GH-secreting cells was higher in the Cd lobe than in the Cp lobe (61.0 +/- 2.3% and 0.8 +/- 0.5%, respectively; P < 0.01). As expected, the middle portion contained substantial numbers of both cell types. These findings suggest that sexual dimorphism in serum PRL levels in adult chickens is due, in part, to an increased cell population of PRL secretors in females. Furthermore, PRL- and GH-secreting cells are distributed unevenly throughout the anterior pituitary of chickens, with the PRL secretors localized to the Cp lobe and the GH secretors to the Cd lobe.

Animals↗

Subcellular distribution of laminin and prolactin in stimulated and blocked prolactin cells in the pituitary of lactating rats.

Laminin (LAM), a glycoprotein component of basement membranes, has been previously detected within several subcellular compartments of prolactin (PRL) cells in the pituitary gland. The present work was aimed at comparing the subcellular localization of PRL, a specific secretory product, with that of LAM, in relation to the secretory activity of PRL cells. LAM and PRL were located in parallel, by ultrastructural immunocytochemistry, in PRL cells of lactating female Wistar rats, either stimulated by suckling, or blocked by weaning, or reactivated by suckle following short-term weaning. Variations in physiological conditions were correlated with a redistribution of PRL immunoreactivity within morphologically modified compartments. The Golgi apparatus became hypertrophied, and PRL impressively accumulated within saccules of the Golgi stacks of blocked cells. On the contrary, no apparent changes occurred in LAM distribution, at least at the Golgi level. Only a slight increase of LAM immunoreactivity was observed in rough endoplasmic reticulum after a long weaning period. PRL could be detected in most of the secretory granules and particularly in forming elements, whereas LAM was observable at the peripheral edge of some mature granules. Such a labeling was not markedly influenced by the physiological state. The prominent structures, indicative of crinophagic activity, characteristic of blocked cells, contained masses of dense material, which were always immunopositive with antibodies to PRL, but never to LAM. These observations could suggest that, in PRL cells, intracellular transport and exportation of LAM are controlled by mechanisms independent from those involved in the regulation of PRL secretion.

Animals↗

Immunocytochemical detection of prolactin or prolactin-like immunoreactivity in epididymis of mature male mouse.

Prolactin (PRL) binds to the testis of mice and rats where it increases the number of luteinizing hormone receptors, increases the binding of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to LH receptors, and enhances testosterone synthesis and secretion. PRL also binds to the prostate and seminal vesicles of rats and humans where it increases organ weight and stimulates growth and uptake of testosterone. PRL binds to the epididymis of rats but the effect of PRL on this organ is unknown. In the present study, a standard immunoperoxidase (PAP) technique was used to detect the binding of endogenous and exogenous PRL or PRL-like peptides to the epididymis of the mature mouse. Throughout the epididymal duct, a positive reaction for peroxidase, suggesting PRL or PRL-like binding, occurred in the Golgi area of principal cells. In segment 1, positive reactions were also visualized in the perinuclear area and in the region located between the Golgi area and the apical surface of the principal cells (supra-Golgi area). In the corpus and cauda epididymidis, scattered entire principal cells were also positive. Throughout the epididymal duct, the reactions indicating the binding of exogenous PRL were slightly stronger than those testing for binding of endogenous peptides. The significance of such binding to the epididymis is uncertain but PRL may perform the same functions in epididymal principal cells as it does in the testis, prostate, and seminal vesicles.

Animals↗