PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 307 records · Page 17Linked to original sources

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive carcinoma in total prostatectomy specimens: distribution, volumes and DNA ploidy.

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) has been postulated to be the main precursor of invasive carcinoma of the prostate (IC). The occurrence, distribution and volumes of PIN and IC in addition to grade were studied in 54 patients who underwent total prostatectomy because of localised IC (T0d-T2 NO MO). PIN always occurred multifocally, localised generally in the peripheral zone (PZ) and was found in all cases. PIN 1 was the most common grade, PIN 3 the least. PIN 3 occurred exclusively in the PZ, in the vicinity of or intermingled with high grade IC. PIN and IC grades were usually concordant. The relative volumes of IC and PIN showed an inverse relationship, i.e. at small IC + PIN volumes PIN dominated, whereas at large IC + PIN volumes both relative and absolute PIN volumes were lower. Furthermore, with increasing PIN grade a tendency towards an increase in tumour volume, Gleason score and frequency of disruption of the basal cell layer was observed. These findings indicate progression from PIN to IC. DNA ploidy of PIN areas was determined by means of flow cytometry. Areas containing PIN 1, 2 or 3 were sampled (1 plug/ml of PIN). All foci displayed only diploid DNA profiles regardless of PIN volume and grade, even with coexistent IC displaying heterogeneous DNA patterns. Our results support the claim that low and medium grade prostatic carcinoma arises from near-diploid PIN stemlines and may progress into heterogeneous tumours containing non-diploid stemlines.

Aged↗

Expression of group IIA secretory phospholipase A2 is elevated in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma.

Phospholipase A2 (PLA2) enzymes release arachidonic acid from cellular phospholipids in a variety of mammalian tissues, including prostate. Group IIa secretory PLA2 (sPLA2) can generate arachidonate from cellular phospholipids. We examined the group IIa sPLA2 expression in benign prostatic tissues, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and adenocarcinoma to determine whether sPLA2 expression is altered in the carcinogenesis of human prostatic cancer. Thirty-three of 74 total cases (45%) of benign prostatic tissue showed positive immunohistochemical staining for group IIA sPLA2, whereas 63 of 69 total cases (91%) of high-grade PINs and 70 of 78 total cases (90%) of adenocarcinomas gave positive results. Four of 10 cases of low-grade PIN showed positive immunoreactivity for sPLA2. The number of cells staining for sPLA2 was significantly less in benign epithelium (4%) and low-grade PIN (4%) compared to high-grade PIN (40%) or adenocarcinoma (38%) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between high-grade PIN and adenocarcinoma in the number of cells staining positively for sPLA2. The intensity of sPLA2 immunoreactivity was also different among benign prostatic tissue, low-grade PIN, high-grade PIN, and prostatic adenocarcinoma specimens. The malignant cells demonstrated more intense immunohistochemical staining (moderate to strong staining in 81% and 69% cases for high-grade PIN and adenocarcinoma, respectively) than benign glands (moderate staining in 11% of cases). No strong staining was observed in benign glands or low-grade PIN. Our data are consistent with the contention that group IIA sPLA2 expression is elevated in neoplastic prostatic tissue and support the hypothesis that dysregulation of sPLA2 may play a role in prostatic carcinogenesis.

Adenocarcinoma↗

The prevalence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in surgical resection specimens: an Indian experience.

BACKGROUND: To the authors' knowledge there is a paucity of literature regarding the prevalence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in the Indian subcontinent. The objective of the current study was to document the prevalence of HGPIN in a low-risk Indian population. METHOD: SA total of 110 prostate specimens (61 taken from the test group and 49 taken from the control group) were studied to document the prevalence of HGPIN in a low-risk Indian population. RESULTS: None of the benign prostate samples were found to harbor HGPIN, whereas 85.24% of the samples from malignant prostates did so. CONCLUSION: SA strong correlation between HGPIN and invasive carcinoma was observed, a finding that reinforces the view that HGPIN is a strong indicator of concurrent invasive prostate carcinoma.

Humans↗

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a premalignant lesion.

Putative premalignant changes in the prostate have been recognized for a number of years. A variety of synonyms have been given to the most commonly described lesion, characterized by proliferation and dysplasia of the normal two cell layers lining prostatic acini and ductules; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the term most often used. A premalignant prostatic lesion should have morphologic features similar to invasive carcinoma (CA), a spatial association with microinvasive cancer arising from the lesion, and should occur at a greater frequency, severity and extent in organs harboring CA. Most definitively, progression from the premalignant lesion into CA should be observed over time. PIN fulfills all but the last of these requirements. High grade PIN is cytologically indistinguishable from prostate carcinoma (CAP). The major differentiating feature between PIN and CAP is the presence, although frequently disrupted, of the basal cell layer in the former. We have studied the basal cell layer in PIN using antibodies to high molecular weight cytokeratins and have found a correlation between PIN grade and the percent disruption of the basal cell layer. The cells making up PIN are phenotypically similar to those of CAP. We have used a variety of markers including cytokeratins, vimentin and the lectin Ulex euroapaeus to demonstrate this similarity. Additionally, we and others have noted decreased PIN immunoreactivity with antibodies directed against prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostatic acid phosphatase. Other investigators have noted additional phenotypic similarities between PIN and CAP, including the ABH and Lewis antigens. PIN incidence and grade correlate well with the presence of CAP elsewhere in the prostate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Carcinoma↗

Transrectal sonographic features of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with pathologic findings.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the transrectal sonographic (TRUS) features of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) by comparing the histopathologic results with TRUS findings in patients who had undergone TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. METHODS: From an initial set of 307 patients who underwent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, TRUS findings for 44 patients whose pathologic results were consistent with PIN were reviewed retrospectively. Among these 44 patients, 12 had only PIN, 20 PIN associated with prostatitis, and 12 PIN associated with prostate cancer foci. After exclusion of the foci that included PIN associated with prostatitis and PIN associated with prostate cancer at the same site, the pathologic results for the core specimens from the 100 PIN foci were correlated with TRUS findings according to their location. The sonographic features sought were hypoechoic areas and regions of heterogeneous echogenicity. RESULTS: Positive TRUS findings were detected in 43% of PIN and 36% of high-grade PIN (HGPIN) focise. For the HGPIN foci with positive TRUS findings, the detected sonographic features were clusters of millimetric hypoechoic foci (CMHF) (53%), hypoechoic areas with well-defined borders (27%), and heterogeneous echogenicity (20%) (not significant). The sensitivity of the presence of CMHF for the diagnosis of HGPIN was only 19%. CONCLUSIONS: TRUS-detected CMHF may indicate HGPIN. Because of the limited sensitivity of this finding, TRUS detection of CMHF does not warrant biopsy, although these lesions warrant close monitoring.

Aged↗

Morphologic transitions between proliferative inflammatory atrophy and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To validate with an independent study that simple atrophy/postatrophic hyperplastic lesions (proliferative inflammatory atrophy [PIA]) often merge directly with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). METHODS: Using radical prostatectomies (n =14), all high-grade PIN and adenocarcinoma lesions were identified. We examined the two-dimensional topographic relationship between individual high-grade PIN lesions and PIA, between carcinoma lesions and PIA, and between carcinoma lesions and high-grade PIN. To reduce the possibility that high-grade PIN lesions represented intraprostatic dissemination of carcinoma, all specimens contained total carcinoma volumes of less than 0.5 cc. RESULTS: High-grade PIN merged with PIA in 267 (42.5% of high-grade PIN lesions) of 629 lesions, was adjacent in 57 lesions (9%), was near in 233 lesions (37%), and was distant from PIA in 72 lesions (11.5%). Carcinoma did not merge with PIA; it was adjacent in 24 (30. 4%) of 79 lesions, was near in 46 lesions (58.2%), and was distant from PIA in 9 lesions (11.4%). Of 79 carcinoma lesions, 18 (23%) merged with high-grade PIN, 11 (14%) were adjacent, 26 (33%) were near, and 24 (30%) were distant from high-grade PIN. Areas of presumed low-grade PIN were often found in association with high-grade PIN and PIA. CONCLUSIONS: Morphologic transitions between high-grade PIN and PIA occur frequently. Although the mere topographic relation of the lesions is not definitive proof of a continuum, these results are consistent with a model in which the proliferative epithelium in PIA may progress to PIN and/or adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Decreased NKX3.1 protein expression in focal prostatic atrophy, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma: association with gleason score and chromosome 8p deletion.

NKX3.1 is a homeobox gene located at chromosome 8p21.2, and one copy is frequently deleted in prostate carcinoma. Prior studies of NKX3.1 mRNA and protein in human prostate cancer and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) have been conflicting, and expression in focal prostate atrophy lesions has not been investigated. Immunohistochemical staining for NKX3.1 on human tissue microarrays was decreased in most focal atrophy and PIN lesions. In carcinoma, staining was inversely correlated with Gleason grade. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that no cases of atrophy had loss or gain of 8p, 8 centromere, or 8q24 (C-MYC) and only 12% of high-grade PIN lesions harbored loss of 8p. By contrast, NKX3.1 staining in carcinoma was correlated with 8p loss and allelic loss was inversely related to Gleason pattern. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR for NKX3.1 mRNA using microdissected atrophy revealed a concordance with protein in five of seven cases. In carcinoma, mRNA levels were decreased in 6 of 12 cases but mRNA levels correlated with protein levels in only 4 of 12 cases, indicating translational or post-translational control. In summary, NKX3.1 protein is reduced in focal atrophy and PIN but is not related to 8p allelic loss in these lesions. Therefore, whereas genetic disruption of NKX3.1 in mice leads to PIN, nongenetic mechanisms reduce NKX3.1 protein levels early in human prostate carcinogenesis, which may facilitate both proliferation and DNA damage in atrophic and PIN cells. Monoallelic deletions on chromosome 8p are associated with more advanced invasive and aggressive disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: animal models 2000.

Numerous animal models of preinvasive prostate cancer have been described in the past decade. Differences among models account for their variable applicability for answering specific research questions. The dog is the only known nonhuman spontaneous animal model of prostate cancer, but numerous transgenic and therapy-induced models have been generated in mice and rats. This report summarizes existing models of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and their relevance for the study of human prostate cancer.

Animals↗

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy: risk of cancer on repeat biopsy related to number of involved cores and morphologic pattern.

The importance of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) on needle biopsy is its association with synchronous invasive carcinoma. The relevance of this relationship has been called into question in recent years. In our study, we examined whether the histologic subtype of HGPIN (ie, tufting, micropapillary, cribriform, flat) and/or the number of core biopsies involved by HGPIN was predictive of a subset of men who were at higher risk of having invasive carcinoma on follow-up biopsies. We examined 200 sets of needle biopsies with a diagnosis of isolated HGPIN. Patient age ranged from 46 to 90 years (mean 66.4 years). The breakdown of the histologic subtypes of HGPIN is as follows: tufting 59%, micropapillary 34.3%, cribriform 6.2%, and flat 0.5%. A total of 132 patients (66%) had follow-up biopsies. Prostatic adenocarcinoma was identified in 28.8% of patients with 89.5% of cancers identified on the first two follow-up biopsies. For men that had two or more cores with HGPIN on the initial biopsy, 35.9% eventually had cancer on follow-up whereas men with only single core involvement had cancer in 22% of cases. Men with tufting/flat HGPIN on the initial biopsy had cancer on follow-up in 31.9% of cases, whereas the micropapillary/cribriform subtype was associated with cancer in 22% of follow-up biopsies. The histologic findings on the first repeat biopsy can be quite informative as to the risk of synchronous invasive carcinoma. Of the men with HGPIN on the first repeat biopsy, 32% eventually had cancer on follow-up. Additionally, if multiple cores were involved by HGPIN on the first repeat biopsy, the risk of finding cancer was 50%, regardless of single or multiple core involvement on the initial biopsy. Men with a benign diagnosis on the first repeat biopsy had a 14% risk of having cancer on follow-up. These data indicate that the multiple core involvement by HGPIN, both on initial and first repeat biopsy, defines a subset of men that are at increased risk of harboring synchronous invasive carcinoma. The histologic subtype of PIN does not appear to be as informative.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Predicting cancer following a diagnosis of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on needle biopsy: data on men with more than one follow-up biopsy.

Most studies on the risk of cancer after high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) on biopsy have been small (fewer than 100 men), have not analyzed in detail if histologic features can predict cancer, and have not assessed the risk of cancer with multiple repeat biopsies. We analyzed 245 men in whom the only abnormal finding on the initial biopsy was high-grade PIN and who had at least one follow-up biopsy. Repeat biopsy identified cancer in 32.2% of men. If only one follow-up biopsy had been performed on the 245 men, only 24.5% of men would have been found to have cancer. The only independent histologic predictor of a cancer diagnosis was the number of cores with high-grade PIN; risk of cancer: 30.2% with 1 or 2 cores, 40% with 3 cores, and 75% with >3 cores. The following did not predict cancer: number of high-grade PIN glands, maximum percentage of gland involved by high-grade PIN, nucleolar prominence, percentage of cells with prominent nucleoli, pattern of high-grade PIN (flat, tufting, micropapillary, cribriform), marked pleomorphism, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound findings, family history of prostate cancer, serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) at time of high-grade PIN diagnosis, and rate of change of serum PSA. Eighty-one (33%) men had more than one follow-up biopsy; in these cases the following findings on the original high-grade PIN biopsy predicted cancer: the presence of mitoses, the number of positive cores, predominant micropapillary and cribriform high-grade PIN, and very large prominent nucleoli. Of 81 men with more than one follow-up biopsy, if the first repeat biopsy were benign, high-grade PIN, or atypical, the eventual cancer rate was 10%, 25.9%, and 57.1%, respectively (p = 0.002). Of 15 men with more than two repeat biopsies, only two (13.3%) had cancer. In summary, approximately one third of men with high-grade PIN on biopsy have cancer on follow-up. If cancer is not found on the first two follow-up biopsies, it will unlikely be found. Although clinical findings at the time of diagnosis of high-grade PIN are not useful to predict who might have cancer, histologic findings may help identify who needs additional biopsies.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Detection of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia with the five-region biopsy technique.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of the five-region biopsy technique compared with the traditional sextant biopsy technique to detect high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination or elevated prostate-specific antigen, or both, by a retrospective study. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients diagnosed with PIN at our institution from January 1 990 to May 1998. Of the 50 patients, 26 patients were diagnosed with high-grade PIN. The reasons for the initial prostate biopsy were elevated prostate-specific antigen in 15 patients, abnormal digital rectal examination in 1 patient, and combined abnormalities in 10 patients. These patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the prostate using the five-region biopsy technique. Biopsy findings from regions 1, 3, and 5 (additional five-region biopsies) were compared with those of regions 2 and 4 (traditional sextant biopsies). RESULTS: Of the 26 patients, PIN was detected in the sextant regions in only 14 patients (53%). However, by using the five-region biopsy technique, an additional 1 2 patients (47%) were diagnosed with PIN (P <0.05). Twenty-four patients underwent repeated five-region biopsies. Eight (33%) of the 24 patients were found to have prostate cancer. Of the eight patients with cancer, 5 of the cancers were found with the five-region biopsy technique. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the five-region method of prostate biopsy significantly increased the diagnosis of PIN compared with the traditional sextant method of biopsy. Furthermore, 33% of patients diagnosed with high-grade PIN on the initial biopsies were found to have prostate cancer on subsequent five-region biopsies.

Aged↗

Inverted (Hobnail) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): report of 15 cases of a previously undescribed pattern of high-grade PIN.

We report 15 cases of a distinctive and previously unrecognized variant of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) that is characterized by polarization of enlarged secretory cell nuclei toward the glandular lumen. We designate this lesion inverted or hobnail HGPIN. In all cases inverted HGPIN was identified on needle biopsy where it merged with typical micropapillary-tufted HGPIN. Inverted secretory cell nuclei frequently demonstrated less prominent nucleoli than adjacent noninverted secretory cell nuclei, yielding a sense of maturation that falsely suggested a non-neoplastic process. Inverted HGPIN was associated with concurrent prostatic adenocarcinoma in seven cases and with atypical glands suspicious for carcinoma in two other cases, whereas in six other cases inverted HGPIN was the only lesion identified. In both radical prostatectomies that followed these biopsies that were available for review, inverted HGPIN was localized to the peripheral zone of the prostate where it merged with usual forms of HGPIN and carcinoma. Inverted HGPIN is a morphologically distinctive form of HGPIN that shares the association with carcinoma and peripheral zone localization with other recognized forms of HGPIN.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a premalignant lesion.

Putative premalignant changes in the prostate have been recognized for a number of years. A variety of synonyms have been given to the most commonly described lesion, one characterized by proliferation and dysplasia of the normal two cell layers lining prostatic acini and ductules. Currently, "prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia" (PIN) is the term most commonly used to describe this entity. In this review, the requirements for a premalignant lesion, the reason why PIN fulfills the majority of these requirements, and a detailed description of the morphologic and phenotypic similarities between PIN and carcinoma will be outlined. Finally, the clinical significance of PIN will be reviewed.

Humans↗

Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: A marker for high-risk groups and a potential target for chemoprevention.

Both the incidence of, and the mortality due to, prostate cancer in the USA are higher in African-American men than in Caucasian men. This is particularly true in men less than 60 years of age. Our findings indicate that both the prevalence and the extensiveness of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) are higher in African-American men compared to Caucasians and that this discrepancy starts as early as the third decade of life. In an autopsy series comprising 650 men, extensive high-grade PIN with diffuse involvement of the prostate gland was evident in 25 (7%) of 364 African-American men less than 50 years of age compared to 4 (2%) of 208 Caucasian men in the same age group (p = 0.002). In a series of more than 1,200 men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer, extensive high-grade PIN was significantly and consistently higher in the African-American cohort than the Caucasian cohort. The difference was more evident in younger patients and those with smaller, organ-confined tumors. In a subset of 216 men (71 African-Americans and 138 Caucasians) with clinical stage T1C prostate cancer, extensive high-grade PIN was identified in 33% and 12% of the two groups respectively (p = 0.001). Moreover, in patients with organ-confined disease, both Gleason score and the extensiveness of high-grade PIN were significant predictors of biochemical recurrence. Our findings suggest an important role for high-grade PIN in the development of clinically significant, potentially aggressive prostate cancer in African-American men. In this epidemiologically identifiable high-risk group, there is a potential opportunity for chemoprevention strategies in younger men with high-grade PIN.

Adult↗

Decrease of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia following androgen deprivation therapy in patients with stage T3 carcinoma treated by radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered the most likely precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma. The effect of androgen deprivation therapy on the prevalence of PIN is unknown. METHODS: We undertook a case-control study of radical retropubic prostatectomies from 24 treated patients and a control group of 24 untreated patients matched for age and clinical stage (all T3). Androgen deprivation therapy included LHRH agonist leuprolide and flutamide (18 patients), diethylstilbestrol (DES) (2 patients), DES with leuprolide and flutamide (1 patients), and orchiectomy (3 patients). Prostatectomy specimens were evaluated for the presence and extent of high-grade PIN according to the number of high-power microscopic fields, and nuclear tumor grade (1 to 4 scale) and Gleason score were also determined. RESULTS: The prevalence of high-grade PIN in pretreatment transrectal needle biopsies was similar in the treated and untreated groups. The prevalence and extent of high-grade PIN were lower in cases treated with androgen deprivation therapy than controls. Nuclear tumor grade was also lower in treated patients, but there was a paradoxical increase in the Gleason score. The prevalence of aneuploidy in the cancers was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that androgen deprivation therapy decreases the prevalence and extent of high-grade PIN.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Regression of mouse prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate model.

PURPOSE: Epidemiologic studies have revealed a decreased risk of colon cancer among people who have regularly taken cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors such as aspirin or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Whereas the selective COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib and exisulind, a metabolic product of sulindac, have gained increasing attention as efficacious chemopreventive agents against colon and prostate cancer, not much is known about the underlying molecular targets and mechanisms. Moreover, the side effects of NSAIDs are a major obstacle for large-scale application to the prevention of cancer in humans; for example, in the United States in 1998, there were 16,550 deaths from NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications. The toxicity associated with these compounds is raising concerns, and more needs to be known about their mode of action and molecular targets. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used the transgenic mouse prostate (TRAMP) model, which exhibits similarities with human prostate cancer, including epithelial origin, progression from the PIN stage to adenocarcinoma, and metastasis by a transgene that is hormonally regulated by androgens. In addition to histologically analyzing the PIN lesions of the dorsolateral prostate from TRAMP mice, we delineated the molecular targets and mechanisms of celecoxib and exisulind against mouse PIN lesions. We performed Western blot analysis of the total protein lysate from the tissues of mouse PIN lesions to measure the level of expression of androgen receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, nuclear factor-kappaB p65, BclII, AKT (total and phosphorylated Ser473), p53, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1, p27, BAX, and caspase-3 to demonstrate the COX-2-independent mechanism involved in the inhibition of PIN lesions of the dorsolateral prostate by both celecoxib and exisulind. RESULTS: We found for the first time that (a) both celecoxib and exisulind as dietary supplements induce strong inhibitory effects against prostate cancer at doses of 800 and 500 ppm, respectively, after 16 weeks; (b) the histologic analysis of the dorsolateral prostate after 2 weeks of treatment indicated a reduction of PIN lesions from 75% to 19% with celecoxib and to 16% with exisulind; (c) more importantly, those few PINs and adenocarcinomas in the groups treated with celecoxib or exisulind showed more apoptotic cells, lower levels of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, and a lower number of mitotic cells. To understand the molecular mechanisms involved in the inhibition of PIN lesions, first, we examined the expression of molecular targets involved in angiogenesis and inflammatory processes. It was clearly evident from Western blot analysis of the total protein lysate derived from the dorsolateral prostate tissues with PIN lesions that expression of androgen receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor, nuclear factor-kappaB p65, and BclII is down-regulated more effectively by celecoxib. Down-regulation of AKT protein (total and phosphorylated at Ser473) signaling by celecoxib clearly indicates an inhibition of the survival gene and the pathological process that could otherwise lead to adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings from this study clearly show the effectiveness of celecoxib and exisulind in reducing the PIN lesions by modulating a cascade of molecular targets involved in COX-2-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Whereas these agents are already in clinical trial or in use as chemopreventive agents, findings from this study demonstrate the difference in their mode of action, thus helping us to understand the side effects.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Quantitative analysis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on tissue sections.

The changes in nuclear morphology (karyometry) and DNA content in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) were analyzed on tissue sections. The cases of PIN were subdivided into PIN 1 and PIN 2 based on the degree of proliferation and the anaplasia of the secretory cells lining the ducts and acini. Cases of nodular hyperplasia (NH) and adenocarcinoma were also studied for comparative purposes. Karyometric analysis showed a progression of most values from NH to PIN to carcinoma. The DNA analysis showed a decrease in the frequency of nuclei in the diploid range and an increase in the percentage of nuclei in the other ploidy regions (especially between 2c and 4c and in the tetraploid range) from NH to PIN to carcinoma. Forward stepwise discriminant analysis showed similarities between NH and PIN 1 and between PIN 2 and carcinoma. These findings suggest that the evolution towards adenocarcinoma is characterized by progressive morphologic derangements of the nuclei and by the transformation of the diploid DNA content into a nondiploid one, with the changes taking place at the level of PIN 2.

Adenocarcinoma↗

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in needle biopsy as risk factor for detection of adenocarcinoma: current level of risk in screening population.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the current incidence of prostate carcinoma detection in serial biopsies in a prostate-specific antigen-based screening population after a diagnosis of isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-PIN) in needle biopsy tissue. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 190 men with a diagnosis of isolated HG-PIN in needle biopsy tissue. Most men (86%) were diagnosed from 1996 to 2000. Logistic regression analysis was used to predict the presence of carcinoma in these 190 men and in a control group of 1677 men with only benign prostatic tissue in needle biopsy tissue. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of detection of carcinoma on serial sextant follow-up biopsies was 30.5% for those with isolated HG-PIN compared with 26.2% for the control group (P = 0.2). Patient age (P = 0.03) and serum prostate-specific antigen level (P = 0.02) were significantly linked to the risk of cancer detection, but suspicious digital rectal examination findings (P = 0.1), the presence of HG-PIN (P = 0.2), and the histologic attributes of PIN were not (all with nonsignificant P values). HG-PIN found on the first repeat biopsy was associated with a 41% risk of subsequent detection of carcinoma compared with an 18% risk if benign prostatic tissue was found on the first repeat biopsy (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that the current level of risk for the detection of prostate carcinoma in a screened population is 30.5% after a diagnosis of isolated HG-PIN in a needle biopsy. This risk level is lower than the previously reported risk of 33% to 50%. HG-PIN is a risk factor for carcinoma detection only when found on consecutive sextant biopsies. The data presented here should prompt reconsideration of repeat biopsy strategies for HG-PIN, and re-evaluation of the absolute necessity of repeat biopsy for all patients with HG-PIN.

Adenocarcinoma↗